The depths to which our news media nas sunk was amply demonstrated today by the almost blanket coverage on the news channels of the trial of the drug addict and possible child abuser Michael Jackson and the possible involvement of his doctor in prescribing drugs to such a disturbed person.
He must be pleased that he is black or no doubt a racial component would have been introduced to the proceedings.
I am not interested in the findings of this death of a man who admittedly dance a bit but otherwise was of no greater and definitely a lot less consequence than many who have died.
All my brief and unwanted knowledge of this case has informed me of is, don't have a black doctor as they seem unable to control the drugs they are authorised to dispense if bribed by money.
All this is of course irrelevent.
The Euro is collapsing in spite of the millions injected into it by Germany and other European countries including ours.
Where has all this money come from?
It has been created out of thin air by computer keyboard and lent with interest payable by the respective taxpayers.
Even worse the repayment time is so long that future generations not yet born will be theoretically liable for this artificially created debt.
All this is being done in a Ponzi style system in an attempt to keep a corrupt and unwanted European Union going for the present.
It is said that "growth"will in future pay the bills (and the interest to the bankers).
What growth? You can not grow forever and apart from some infrastructure all needs have been provided for Europeans. We all have a roof over our heads, mobile phones, televisions and kitchens and an adequate diet. Yes fuel is a problem but growth will make this worse.
Do those at present in control believe future generations will put up with paying these unfair and un necessary debts thus reducing their standard of living?
If they believe this they are deluded.
These debts will be defaulted on or there will be revolution, and the people will take power.
Perhaps for the first time for many years we may have a semblance of democracy, and the theives of the EU and the bankers have their true deserts.
The EU is just one part of the globalist capitalist cabal which seeks to use us in their financial interests. They wish to control us financially and politically.
Evidence of this can be seen in titles given to certain jobs.
When I was younger there were "personnel" departments. Now it is "Human Resources", that is each person is a resource to be used by the financiers to further their globalist financial agenda.
They do not regard us as people. We are there to be used.
We have travelled little distance from the Middle Ages when the great aristocrats controlled all the wealth and even the freedoms of the people.
Our freedoms are being diminished. Our free speech has become criminal. Our wishes are ignored by those who through this iniquitous electoral system, financed by wealthy capitalists now control us.
In my three years of history lessons at grammar school I learnt a good and relevent saying.
HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF.
THAT SAYING STILL HOLDS TRUE.
REMEMBER THE FRENCH REVOLUTION.
If people are pushed too far HISTORY COULD INDEED REPEAT ITSELF, if those in power do not see sense.
LET THE EURO FAIL, THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT IT!
Friday, 30 September 2011
Thursday, 29 September 2011
GOD HELP EUROPE
It seems that the Euro project has been saved for the present.
The bankers will get their rewards and the taxpayers of Germany and other European countries will pay the price of their bonuses, even including Britain although we are not part of that scam.
The Euro project can never work however many Billions (trillions?) are thrown at it without causing poverty among millions of people through no fault of their own.
I am not talking now of how all this money is created out of thin air and interest charged on it by the banks.
I am talking about simple geographical facts.
When I was at school unlike now we were taught Geography as a scientific discipline, uncorrupted by PC influences.
We were taught the reasons why cetrtain regions specialised in certain industries and created their prosperity thereby.
Thus in my region it was "King coal and King cotton which created the wealth (the profits unfortunately leaving our area for the great maw of London), but it did provide employment and in doing so made Britain as a whole wealthy.
But this was just one of many regions specialising on and taking advantage of their strengths and the whole taken together made a successful country.
This is the weakness of the EU. It seeks to lump all countries together with a common tax and political system which prevents local areas all over Europe exploiting their relative advantages.
It is no surprise that the countries (the PIGS) are at the priphery of this union.
Why are they unable to compete with the Northern European countries in this union?
The answer is simple. Geography. These countries are distant from the centres of power and thus unable to compete. It is not a level playing field.
Imagine a firm wanting to start a factory. Will they open it in Greece, Southern Italy or in North West England in paces such as Blackpool or Workington?
Very unlikely as the transport costs would make them uncompetitive so the new factory will be built in North Germany, the Low Countries, North France or South East England, all near to the hub of the EU.
The common rules on tax and economics preclude these regions from taking measures to negate this disadvantage.
To survive the more peripheral regions must exploit any comparative advantage they may have and if these advantages are few create them.
The Isle of man for instance has a benign tax system which counters its severe transport disadvantage.
Greece has its sun as does Southern Italy, Spain and Portugal. We in the North of England have our fishing (and still plenty of coal and probably gas) if the European fisheries policy were rescinded.
We have a great port Liverpool the nearest to the Americas which if we had a decent transport system could be revitalised, and industries could be encouraged to produce easily exportable goods for the Americas markets with suitable tax breaks. We have the engineering expertise (as yet) and it could be done.
Even shipbuilding could be resurrected with the right will and conditions. Finland, the only prosperous periphjeral EU country has a thriving shipbuilding industry in a harsh climate.
If they can do it so can we.
Why don't we do it?
Because everything European is geared to the centre of the Union for political and financial reasons and this is why even if it does not suffer financial collapse the peripheral regions will always be poorer.
The "experts" will at some time have to consider whether they want a rich crowded centre surrounded by relative poverty and empty areas or will they come to their senses and see it is unworkable.
Many of the bankers and Eurocrats will of course taken their ill gotten gains elsewhere but we, the people of Europe will face strife, disorder and possibly violent revolution because of this injustice.
The Euro project was supposed in part as a method of ensuring peace and stability but as I think I have shown, the contradictions caused by a unified set of rules for very different regions are a recipe for trouble.
The next conflict will not be between nations fortunately but between the united impoverished peoples of the peripheral regions against those who have betrayed and stolen from them.
This institution, supposedly an antidote for war but beset by unresolvable stresses will be the cause of civil war when the money runs out.
I have not even started on the imposition of millions of unwanted aliens in our midst BUT--
It will demonstrate THE LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES and
GOD HELP EUROPE.
The bankers will get their rewards and the taxpayers of Germany and other European countries will pay the price of their bonuses, even including Britain although we are not part of that scam.
The Euro project can never work however many Billions (trillions?) are thrown at it without causing poverty among millions of people through no fault of their own.
I am not talking now of how all this money is created out of thin air and interest charged on it by the banks.
I am talking about simple geographical facts.
When I was at school unlike now we were taught Geography as a scientific discipline, uncorrupted by PC influences.
We were taught the reasons why cetrtain regions specialised in certain industries and created their prosperity thereby.
Thus in my region it was "King coal and King cotton which created the wealth (the profits unfortunately leaving our area for the great maw of London), but it did provide employment and in doing so made Britain as a whole wealthy.
But this was just one of many regions specialising on and taking advantage of their strengths and the whole taken together made a successful country.
This is the weakness of the EU. It seeks to lump all countries together with a common tax and political system which prevents local areas all over Europe exploiting their relative advantages.
It is no surprise that the countries (the PIGS) are at the priphery of this union.
Why are they unable to compete with the Northern European countries in this union?
The answer is simple. Geography. These countries are distant from the centres of power and thus unable to compete. It is not a level playing field.
Imagine a firm wanting to start a factory. Will they open it in Greece, Southern Italy or in North West England in paces such as Blackpool or Workington?
Very unlikely as the transport costs would make them uncompetitive so the new factory will be built in North Germany, the Low Countries, North France or South East England, all near to the hub of the EU.
The common rules on tax and economics preclude these regions from taking measures to negate this disadvantage.
To survive the more peripheral regions must exploit any comparative advantage they may have and if these advantages are few create them.
The Isle of man for instance has a benign tax system which counters its severe transport disadvantage.
Greece has its sun as does Southern Italy, Spain and Portugal. We in the North of England have our fishing (and still plenty of coal and probably gas) if the European fisheries policy were rescinded.
We have a great port Liverpool the nearest to the Americas which if we had a decent transport system could be revitalised, and industries could be encouraged to produce easily exportable goods for the Americas markets with suitable tax breaks. We have the engineering expertise (as yet) and it could be done.
Even shipbuilding could be resurrected with the right will and conditions. Finland, the only prosperous periphjeral EU country has a thriving shipbuilding industry in a harsh climate.
If they can do it so can we.
Why don't we do it?
Because everything European is geared to the centre of the Union for political and financial reasons and this is why even if it does not suffer financial collapse the peripheral regions will always be poorer.
The "experts" will at some time have to consider whether they want a rich crowded centre surrounded by relative poverty and empty areas or will they come to their senses and see it is unworkable.
Many of the bankers and Eurocrats will of course taken their ill gotten gains elsewhere but we, the people of Europe will face strife, disorder and possibly violent revolution because of this injustice.
The Euro project was supposed in part as a method of ensuring peace and stability but as I think I have shown, the contradictions caused by a unified set of rules for very different regions are a recipe for trouble.
The next conflict will not be between nations fortunately but between the united impoverished peoples of the peripheral regions against those who have betrayed and stolen from them.
This institution, supposedly an antidote for war but beset by unresolvable stresses will be the cause of civil war when the money runs out.
I have not even started on the imposition of millions of unwanted aliens in our midst BUT--
It will demonstrate THE LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES and
GOD HELP EUROPE.
Wednesday, 28 September 2011
THE END OF THE EURO, HOPEFULLY.
The shambles which is known as the EU and the financial problems it faces and can not solve are a result of the fashinonable for now idea that diversity is a good thing.
The Euro is finished. It may linger on helped by ever draconian measures to try and ensure it survival.
New taxes are proposed to solve the financial crisis which are not the fault of Greece but the idiotic idea that different nations with different cultures and financial rules can be united under a common umbrella.
This can never be achieved by the consent of the various peoples and nations of Europe. It is only possible by undemocratic edicts issued by Brussels encouraged by the "ex"? Communist Barrosso who proposes a tax on financial transactions to pay some of the bills.
Now I have no problems with taxing the bankng parasites, many of whom are based in the City of London and who create no wealth but feed on the carcasses of businses they have destroyed by buying cheap, swearing the assets and selling them off to the detriment of our country.
Yes we should hit these thieves hard.
But Barosso's idea is that any taxes gained from this action should be given to Europe to pay their debts.
We should tax them and keep the money here.
It seems that thse unelected commissars will stop at nothing to save their EU project.
They will do anything, put people on the dole, destroy industries and even nations to promote their internationalist project.
It is straight out of the "Frankfurt School" of Marxist thought.
These people who champion diversity or so they say, object to European diversity. Their aim is to have a monolithic EUSSR controlled not by the democratic wishes of the people but the bureaucrats of Brussels.
Tonight on Newsnight we saw signs of the Greek society breaking down. They are stuck in the situation caused by their membership of the Euro.
Different countries have their own societies, their own cultures, strengths and weaknesses and can not survive as coherent societies if brought into a supposedly unified whole.
It is indeed ironic that those in power and who are imposing diversity on our country wish and are trying to impose uniformity on the many different proud nations which make up the European peoples.
That it will not work is shown by the trouble with the Euro project. It never will. It has been tried by empire builders of far greater calibre than the overpaid bureaucrats who are now just as undemocratically in charge.
Caesar, Charlemagne, Napoleon, Stalin and Hitler all tried to unite our European nations against the will of the people and failed and in doing so nearly brought the house down.
But they eventually failed by the will of the people.
They will fail again. It will be costly and we may have to pay a price for our hard won freedom as our forebears have before but it will have to be done whatever the cost.
Freedom trumps all and will eventually prevail and we can look forward to friendly relations with our European brothers working in our own way to secure the future of our continent FOR THE PEOPLE and not the bureaucrats and bankers who have cheated us for the last forty years.
Those who think they rule us will use every last weapon in their armory to preserve their idea of a Eurostate but the end for these traitors is nigh.
The European people will prevail.
Let's hope the German Parliament tomorrow rejects pouring more money down the drain to satisfy the bankers and bureaucrats of Brussels and save our continent and our future.
The Euro is finished. It may linger on helped by ever draconian measures to try and ensure it survival.
New taxes are proposed to solve the financial crisis which are not the fault of Greece but the idiotic idea that different nations with different cultures and financial rules can be united under a common umbrella.
This can never be achieved by the consent of the various peoples and nations of Europe. It is only possible by undemocratic edicts issued by Brussels encouraged by the "ex"? Communist Barrosso who proposes a tax on financial transactions to pay some of the bills.
Now I have no problems with taxing the bankng parasites, many of whom are based in the City of London and who create no wealth but feed on the carcasses of businses they have destroyed by buying cheap, swearing the assets and selling them off to the detriment of our country.
Yes we should hit these thieves hard.
But Barosso's idea is that any taxes gained from this action should be given to Europe to pay their debts.
We should tax them and keep the money here.
It seems that thse unelected commissars will stop at nothing to save their EU project.
They will do anything, put people on the dole, destroy industries and even nations to promote their internationalist project.
It is straight out of the "Frankfurt School" of Marxist thought.
These people who champion diversity or so they say, object to European diversity. Their aim is to have a monolithic EUSSR controlled not by the democratic wishes of the people but the bureaucrats of Brussels.
Tonight on Newsnight we saw signs of the Greek society breaking down. They are stuck in the situation caused by their membership of the Euro.
Different countries have their own societies, their own cultures, strengths and weaknesses and can not survive as coherent societies if brought into a supposedly unified whole.
It is indeed ironic that those in power and who are imposing diversity on our country wish and are trying to impose uniformity on the many different proud nations which make up the European peoples.
That it will not work is shown by the trouble with the Euro project. It never will. It has been tried by empire builders of far greater calibre than the overpaid bureaucrats who are now just as undemocratically in charge.
Caesar, Charlemagne, Napoleon, Stalin and Hitler all tried to unite our European nations against the will of the people and failed and in doing so nearly brought the house down.
But they eventually failed by the will of the people.
They will fail again. It will be costly and we may have to pay a price for our hard won freedom as our forebears have before but it will have to be done whatever the cost.
Freedom trumps all and will eventually prevail and we can look forward to friendly relations with our European brothers working in our own way to secure the future of our continent FOR THE PEOPLE and not the bureaucrats and bankers who have cheated us for the last forty years.
Those who think they rule us will use every last weapon in their armory to preserve their idea of a Eurostate but the end for these traitors is nigh.
The European people will prevail.
Let's hope the German Parliament tomorrow rejects pouring more money down the drain to satisfy the bankers and bureaucrats of Brussels and save our continent and our future.
Tuesday, 27 September 2011
WASTING ACTIVIST'S TIME.
There are it seems new members in the BNP replacing the seasoned activists who have in several ways been sidelined or sacked from the Party.
I have heard of few of them so they are obviously new recruits, but their presence demonstrates a desire to help save our country and I wish them well.
I am told the recent NW organisers meeting was bland and nothing of note came out of it, hardly surprising given the inexperience of the new members.
I wonder how long before these at present fired up members will last. Not long I would suspect.
They will either give up exhausted at fighting what will become evident as a lost cause or disagree with the leadership and be suspended or worse.
This has been the weak link of the party for the last ten years. Rapid turnover.
People join, enthusiastic but give up after all too few years, only to be replaced by others.
They remain nationalists but give up on the Party, disillusioned by incompetence and infighting.
Why, when the country faces a financial abyss caused by incompetent government, a cultural catastrophe and mounting unemployment is the Party not doing better?
In spite of these new enthusiastic members we are losing ground even as the conditions for our growth are favourable.
No one trusts the major parties but our influence decreases.
We are in effect ignored. We do not matter.
The point is that a majority of British people are fearful for the future, want a party which supports their interests and not those of international bankers and foreigners but decline to support us.
The party's financial mismanagement and unlikable leadership are not the real cause of our decreasing influence.
Our trouble is that we portray the wrong image, push the wrong policies and miss the immediate issues which would differentiate us from the other parties.
A favourite medical regime to satisfy patients was to give patients something to do to take their mind off their complaints.
The BNP is doing the same in politics, in effect wasting activists time.
I believe the present policies of the Party of getting signatures at table tops to exit the EU and Bring Our Boys home are a waste of time.
The vast majority of the people believe in these issues, indeed there have been large anti war demonstrations in London and an internet petition against the EU.
What difference therefore do they think a few signatures taken at a table top will make?
It will achieve nothing politically but will exhaust the energies of the new activists on blind alley campaigns when with different issues they could make a huge difference.
It is not rocket science, but I am beginning to believe it is a deliberate ploy to divert the enthusiasm of the new activists from more productive activities.
Make of that what you will, but I do not think those who have been expelled are State assets. These latter remain in the Party in my opinion.
Think what we could achieve if we concentrated on jobs, housing, banks, taxes Britishness, etc, matters of great importance to everybody.
We would not have to mention immigration except as a contributing factor to our national woes, and thus free ourselves from the racist tag.
I doubt whether the BNP as now run will move along these lines.
Mike Whitby said the last time I heard him that if something was not working it was stupid to continue on the same way. That is where I do agree with him, so why is the Party continuing along the same failed path?
I have answered that question above.
I have heard of few of them so they are obviously new recruits, but their presence demonstrates a desire to help save our country and I wish them well.
I am told the recent NW organisers meeting was bland and nothing of note came out of it, hardly surprising given the inexperience of the new members.
I wonder how long before these at present fired up members will last. Not long I would suspect.
They will either give up exhausted at fighting what will become evident as a lost cause or disagree with the leadership and be suspended or worse.
This has been the weak link of the party for the last ten years. Rapid turnover.
People join, enthusiastic but give up after all too few years, only to be replaced by others.
They remain nationalists but give up on the Party, disillusioned by incompetence and infighting.
Why, when the country faces a financial abyss caused by incompetent government, a cultural catastrophe and mounting unemployment is the Party not doing better?
In spite of these new enthusiastic members we are losing ground even as the conditions for our growth are favourable.
No one trusts the major parties but our influence decreases.
We are in effect ignored. We do not matter.
The point is that a majority of British people are fearful for the future, want a party which supports their interests and not those of international bankers and foreigners but decline to support us.
The party's financial mismanagement and unlikable leadership are not the real cause of our decreasing influence.
Our trouble is that we portray the wrong image, push the wrong policies and miss the immediate issues which would differentiate us from the other parties.
A favourite medical regime to satisfy patients was to give patients something to do to take their mind off their complaints.
The BNP is doing the same in politics, in effect wasting activists time.
I believe the present policies of the Party of getting signatures at table tops to exit the EU and Bring Our Boys home are a waste of time.
The vast majority of the people believe in these issues, indeed there have been large anti war demonstrations in London and an internet petition against the EU.
What difference therefore do they think a few signatures taken at a table top will make?
It will achieve nothing politically but will exhaust the energies of the new activists on blind alley campaigns when with different issues they could make a huge difference.
It is not rocket science, but I am beginning to believe it is a deliberate ploy to divert the enthusiasm of the new activists from more productive activities.
Make of that what you will, but I do not think those who have been expelled are State assets. These latter remain in the Party in my opinion.
Think what we could achieve if we concentrated on jobs, housing, banks, taxes Britishness, etc, matters of great importance to everybody.
We would not have to mention immigration except as a contributing factor to our national woes, and thus free ourselves from the racist tag.
I doubt whether the BNP as now run will move along these lines.
Mike Whitby said the last time I heard him that if something was not working it was stupid to continue on the same way. That is where I do agree with him, so why is the Party continuing along the same failed path?
I have answered that question above.
Monday, 26 September 2011
THE SEXUALISATION OF BRITISH CHILDREN IN BRITISH SCHOOLS
"
Education bodies in parts of the country are using the Healthy Schools initiative introduced by Tony Blair’s government to impose “liberal and permissive” teaching on pupils, campaigners warn.
Labour introduced the National Healthy Schools Programme in 1999, with aims including support for healthy behaviour and reduction of health inequalities.
But a survey of all 152 local authorities in England found inconsistency in the way in which its guidelines were being applied in the classroom, according to the Family Education Trust.
A report by the trust suggests that some authorities are insisting schools teach sex education in order to qualify for the Healthy Schools award.
The trust said such lessons are not required by law or the Healthy Schools criteria.
Norman Wells, a Family Education Trust director, said: “It is very concerning to find some local authorities insisting that primary schools teach sex and relationships education as a condition of receiving the Healthy Schools award, when primary school governing bodies are free to decide whether or not to teach sex education after consultation with parents.
"Primary schools that make a principled decision not to teach sex education should not be stigmatised and denied a sought-after award for that reason.
“There is nothing inherently 'unhealthy’ about a primary school that decides not to teach sex education.”
The report also found that a significant minority of local authorities were using the initiative to restrict schools’ use of outside agencies to teach the benefits of saving sex for marriage.
It found secondary schools were being told that such messages could only be taught in “Healthy Schools” if they were balanced by other viewpoints.
However, there was no such reservation or qualification regarding instruction on the use of condoms.
Mr Wells said: “It is ironic that in some local authority areas, the Healthy Schools programme is undermining the healthiest messages of all and depriving young people of learning about the physical, emotional and social benefits of keeping sex within a lifelong, mutually faithful marriage.”
The report calls on local authorities to be less prescriptive and to recognise that schools are responsible for determining their policy on sex and relationships education on a local basis, in consultation with parents.
Mr Wells said local authorities should respect the position of schools which, after consultation with parents, decide that they would like to use external agencies that emphasise the benefits of saving sex for marriage."
Does this not make you ANGRY ?
Britons accused of trying to join Somali militants
The truth of this is not that BRITONS are trying to join Somali militants but BANGLADESHIS who, like anyone from the third world who come to our country are instantly given a BRITISH PASSPORT.
Why BANGLADESHIS who have BANGLADESHI passports need or are given a BRITISH passport is beyond me.
Now that these men have been caught it won't be long before they are sent back home. No, not to Bangladesh but back to OUR HOME and OUR LAND which it seems we have no say in who can come here, who can stay and who can't.
We can't even deport foreigners who have taken part in mass murder and genocide, paedophilia, rape and a 1000 other crimes which would see a NATIVE BRITON in a foreign country imprisoned and then deported back home.
"In recent months, MI5 and MI6 have become aware of an increasing number of young British men arriving in the African country in order to cross into Somalia, sources told The Daily Telegraph.
Why BANGLADESHIS who have BANGLADESHI passports need or are given a BRITISH passport is beyond me.
Now that these men have been caught it won't be long before they are sent back home. No, not to Bangladesh but back to OUR HOME and OUR LAND which it seems we have no say in who can come here, who can stay and who can't.
We can't even deport foreigners who have taken part in mass murder and genocide, paedophilia, rape and a 1000 other crimes which would see a NATIVE BRITON in a foreign country imprisoned and then deported back home.
"In recent months, MI5 and MI6 have become aware of an increasing number of young British men arriving in the African country in order to cross into Somalia, sources told The Daily Telegraph.
In Somalia, they have been joining up with al-Shabaab, a terrorist group linked to al-Qaeda in East Africa and there are concerns that they could return to Britain to launch attacks.
The latest arrests involved three men who were detained for questioning in the port of Mombasa last week.
Ambrose Munyasia, head of Kenya’s Coast Province police force, said: “They were seen acting suspiciously. We trailed them for a day after suspecting their movement within the town. Although they told us that they are tourists, some of their actions have given us cause to believe that they are not.”
Three suspected British al-Shabaab members were arrested in north east Kenya in May.
The men were of Bangladeshi origin but holding British passports, according to reports.
They were arrested when the Land Rover they were travelling in was stopped at a police checkpoint on a road linking Kenya and Somalia.
Philip Ndolo, the North Eastern regional deputy police chief, said the suspects claimed to be heading for the tourist island of Lamu, thousands of miles from where they were picked up.
He said investigations showed that the three used complex routes to avoid police checkpoints to get to the village where they were eventually arrested.
In November 2002 terrorists tried to shoot down an Israeli-chartered Boeing 757, firing two missiles which narrowly missed the plane as it took off from Mombasa airport and killing 15 people in a bomb explosion at the nearby Paradise Hotel."
A team of specialist forensic officers were examining laptops belonging to the suspects, sources said.
Kenyan counter-terrorism police were said to have become suspicious about the men and tracked their movements before arresting them on Thursday.
Sunday, 25 September 2011
NON NURSING NURSES
The head of the Royal College of Nursing has suggested that visiting times in Hospitals should be relaxed so that relatives can help with simple nursing tasks such as feeding patients and toiletting.
This demonstrates the degree to which the NHS has sunk and typifies what is wrong with the nursing "profession".
Over the last 20 years or so nursing has become a proffession demanding it seems, a degree no doubt placing great stress on important subjects such as gender, ethnic and cultural requirements.
In addition computer proficiency and the correct form filling will be taught.
This of course will leave little time for nursing, the TLC of making sure patients are fed and comfortable and not left in soiled beds.
That all is well on the wards can be seen every day on visits to relatives.
The university trained nurses of course will be there, sitting round a computer screen in between chatting among themselves. Being highly educated one can not expect them do do anything so demeaning as actual nursing. In any case there is not time for menial tasks such as this as forms have to be filled in and equality and diversity targets met.
The nursing functions are left to untrained staff, often from the third world who if patients are lucky can actually speak English. Some care, many don't and patients are often neglected.
Ward cleanliness, previously of paramount importance has often been contracted out and is performed in a desultary inefficient manner often by foreigners brought in on the cheap from third world country slums to whom sterility and cleanliness is an alien concept.
The matrons of old would have a fit, but never mind, all is well. All the forms are filled in correctly even if patients are starving, lying in their own filth and infected by the many pathogens which abound in hospitals nowadays.
The increased number of hospital contracted infections is blamed on the misuse of antibiotics causing resistance, and there may be a little truth in that. But before there were antibiotics infections were not so prevelant. There were no antibiotics for the bacteria to be resistant to.
But there was cleaning. There were dedicated nurses. There were ward sisters and matrons of whom all working on the wards were in fear.
Harridans they may have seemed to the junior staff, but the buck did stop with them and thus they ruled with a rod of iron, to the benefit of all, not least and most importantly the patients.
This new idea of encouraging relatives (if patients had them) to visit more regularly shows the contempt for the profession of nursing by those in charge.
They show a lack of knowledge of infection control by encouraging even more visiting as visitors often introduce infection into an environment where sick people have enough on their plate (not food it seems)recovering from their various illnesses.
Visitors are a great comfort to patients but I believe visiting should be restricted in any case in order to lessen the chance of infection on the wards.
It seems nursing has gone the way of the bin men I spoke about a couple of days ago.
The bosses talk about it and fill all the forms in and are judged to have done a good job.
BUT the actual work (in nursing and TLC) comes a very distant second.
And that is what is wrong with our country.
Too much talk and not enough action.
P.S I do not include the reception and out patient staff at Wigan Infirmary in this little rant. They could not be more helpful, but then they are all native Wiganers to whom civility and courtesy comes naturally.
This demonstrates the degree to which the NHS has sunk and typifies what is wrong with the nursing "profession".
Over the last 20 years or so nursing has become a proffession demanding it seems, a degree no doubt placing great stress on important subjects such as gender, ethnic and cultural requirements.
In addition computer proficiency and the correct form filling will be taught.
This of course will leave little time for nursing, the TLC of making sure patients are fed and comfortable and not left in soiled beds.
That all is well on the wards can be seen every day on visits to relatives.
The university trained nurses of course will be there, sitting round a computer screen in between chatting among themselves. Being highly educated one can not expect them do do anything so demeaning as actual nursing. In any case there is not time for menial tasks such as this as forms have to be filled in and equality and diversity targets met.
The nursing functions are left to untrained staff, often from the third world who if patients are lucky can actually speak English. Some care, many don't and patients are often neglected.
Ward cleanliness, previously of paramount importance has often been contracted out and is performed in a desultary inefficient manner often by foreigners brought in on the cheap from third world country slums to whom sterility and cleanliness is an alien concept.
The matrons of old would have a fit, but never mind, all is well. All the forms are filled in correctly even if patients are starving, lying in their own filth and infected by the many pathogens which abound in hospitals nowadays.
The increased number of hospital contracted infections is blamed on the misuse of antibiotics causing resistance, and there may be a little truth in that. But before there were antibiotics infections were not so prevelant. There were no antibiotics for the bacteria to be resistant to.
But there was cleaning. There were dedicated nurses. There were ward sisters and matrons of whom all working on the wards were in fear.
Harridans they may have seemed to the junior staff, but the buck did stop with them and thus they ruled with a rod of iron, to the benefit of all, not least and most importantly the patients.
This new idea of encouraging relatives (if patients had them) to visit more regularly shows the contempt for the profession of nursing by those in charge.
They show a lack of knowledge of infection control by encouraging even more visiting as visitors often introduce infection into an environment where sick people have enough on their plate (not food it seems)recovering from their various illnesses.
Visitors are a great comfort to patients but I believe visiting should be restricted in any case in order to lessen the chance of infection on the wards.
It seems nursing has gone the way of the bin men I spoke about a couple of days ago.
The bosses talk about it and fill all the forms in and are judged to have done a good job.
BUT the actual work (in nursing and TLC) comes a very distant second.
And that is what is wrong with our country.
Too much talk and not enough action.
P.S I do not include the reception and out patient staff at Wigan Infirmary in this little rant. They could not be more helpful, but then they are all native Wiganers to whom civility and courtesy comes naturally.
Friday, 23 September 2011
PANORAMA, A SHAMBOLIC INTERVIEW.
Has the BNP completely lost its marbles?
In a trailer for a film to expose the BBC to be played tonight the Party it seems made a complete fool of itself.
I accept that the BBC is infested by trendy PC Lefties and is no friend of ours but having admitted the reporters to the venue it was pure stupidity to make such a fool of themselves in front of not only their cameras but THOSE OF THE BBC who were also filming.
I agree filming any interview is good practice to enable rebuttal of sneaky editorial tactics and blatant lying which that organisation is often guilty of.
But do they not realise that their aggressive tactics will only portray the party in an even worse light and was recorded BY THE BBC?
The job of reporters in any case is to create interest in their programme by getting up the noses of the interviewees and is used against all parties.
If a party consents to be interviewed, surely the best course is to answer in a civilised manner in the hope of a positive portrayal. Civility can not be portrayed as bad manners even in a biased programme.
Why does our party have to be so defensive? Other parties are pleased to have their point of view aired even at the risk of bias.
Are our leaders and spokesmen not able to hold their own with reporters? Have they so little faith in their principles and facts?
To question reporters on the many perverts paedophiles and cheats in the BBC (which there are) is irrelevant.
A reporter's job is to ask, not answer questions and is not responsible for the conduct of others in his organisation, nor does he necessarily agree with that organisation's stance.
Nick Griffin complains that he has not been asked again on to "Question Time" where he knows they would try to ambush him as they did last time (next time I hope he is better prepared).
"Question Time" can be and is edited before it is broadcast whereas an interview on our premises can be videoed.
If he wants to be on that programme when he knows they will try to fit him up, why can he not answer in an interview controlled by the Party.
It looks as if he has something to hide. Has he?
We make fools of ourselves by behaving as Simon Darby does on this film and come over as wanting to deflect questions by asking irrelevent questions of the interviewer. We seem on the run as do those exposed on "Watchdog" and thus make a poor impression.
Yes the BBC are against us, but I believe by acting in such an aggressive way we will be portrayed in an even worse light than we would have been.
We are the ambassadors for Nationalism and if the behaviour on this "taster"is typical I shudder to think what the BBC have and what is on the rest of the film.
If that's the best we can do GOD HELP US!
NO WONDER WE ARE GOING DOWN!
In a trailer for a film to expose the BBC to be played tonight the Party it seems made a complete fool of itself.
I accept that the BBC is infested by trendy PC Lefties and is no friend of ours but having admitted the reporters to the venue it was pure stupidity to make such a fool of themselves in front of not only their cameras but THOSE OF THE BBC who were also filming.
I agree filming any interview is good practice to enable rebuttal of sneaky editorial tactics and blatant lying which that organisation is often guilty of.
But do they not realise that their aggressive tactics will only portray the party in an even worse light and was recorded BY THE BBC?
The job of reporters in any case is to create interest in their programme by getting up the noses of the interviewees and is used against all parties.
If a party consents to be interviewed, surely the best course is to answer in a civilised manner in the hope of a positive portrayal. Civility can not be portrayed as bad manners even in a biased programme.
Why does our party have to be so defensive? Other parties are pleased to have their point of view aired even at the risk of bias.
Are our leaders and spokesmen not able to hold their own with reporters? Have they so little faith in their principles and facts?
To question reporters on the many perverts paedophiles and cheats in the BBC (which there are) is irrelevant.
A reporter's job is to ask, not answer questions and is not responsible for the conduct of others in his organisation, nor does he necessarily agree with that organisation's stance.
Nick Griffin complains that he has not been asked again on to "Question Time" where he knows they would try to ambush him as they did last time (next time I hope he is better prepared).
"Question Time" can be and is edited before it is broadcast whereas an interview on our premises can be videoed.
If he wants to be on that programme when he knows they will try to fit him up, why can he not answer in an interview controlled by the Party.
It looks as if he has something to hide. Has he?
We make fools of ourselves by behaving as Simon Darby does on this film and come over as wanting to deflect questions by asking irrelevent questions of the interviewer. We seem on the run as do those exposed on "Watchdog" and thus make a poor impression.
Yes the BBC are against us, but I believe by acting in such an aggressive way we will be portrayed in an even worse light than we would have been.
We are the ambassadors for Nationalism and if the behaviour on this "taster"is typical I shudder to think what the BBC have and what is on the rest of the film.
If that's the best we can do GOD HELP US!
NO WONDER WE ARE GOING DOWN!
A TALE OF FOUR BINS
A few days ago I wrote about waste by local and national government and the need to axe useless, nonproductive jobs which the general public would not miss.
This would help mitigate the disasterous national financial situation, I argued while those displaced from their unproductive positions could be redeployed in work which provided a return.
A day later I had an instance of such inefficiency.
My wife had asked for a "green bin" for garden rubbish, (why I do not know as we live on a farm, but that's not the point), and efficiently the next day one was delivered.
That was in April this year but the trouble is that it has never been emptied.
My wife rang the council and an official said he would get "The Green Bin Officer" to ring back.
We had a phone call the next day, not from the officer who was on holiday (it makes a change from being at a meeting or off sick) who said that they had no record of the green bin.
Not only that but that the computer did not indicate that the council had ever emptied our bin as the farm road was too narrow for the vehicle to access.
Now this is strange because a full sized bin wagon has emptied my bins since 1967 so it was strange to learn that the officer had no record of the bin wagon having visited my premises, in spite of their computer technology (no doubt requiring a "computer officer")
I believe he is to visit us to check whether the vehicle which has come down the drive for 40 years can actually do so. A nice hour out of the office for him.
Also for the last 10 months we have had a blue paper bin and a brown bottle bin provided by the council and which are emptied regularly as is the usual black wheely bin for general rubbish. Presumably these bins have their own controllers,(a blue, brown and black bin officer)but they don't know that we exist, in spite of emptying them.
I am a strong believer in recycling and I have no complaints at all with the service I get from the bin men, the people who actually do the work.
But times are hard and finances tight and cuts could have to be made.
I would expect these to fall on those at the bin face with fewer collections made.
Meanwhile I am sure all will be in order in the office and the various "officers" and "controllers" will continue to tap their keyboards and tick the requisite boxes at pay rates no doubt greater than those who actually do the donkey work.
All's well then
NO IT ISN'T!
This unimportant little episode indicates what is wrong with local and national government.
Many involved in controlling, discussing and record keeping --BUT FEW DOING THE WORK.
It can be put right, but will it?
I doubt it as those box tickers are the ones allocating the jobs and redundancies and you can be sure it will not be their jobs which will be lost.
IT WILL BE THE JOBS AT THE WORK FACE and the services which we want and pay for will deteriorate still further.
This would help mitigate the disasterous national financial situation, I argued while those displaced from their unproductive positions could be redeployed in work which provided a return.
A day later I had an instance of such inefficiency.
My wife had asked for a "green bin" for garden rubbish, (why I do not know as we live on a farm, but that's not the point), and efficiently the next day one was delivered.
That was in April this year but the trouble is that it has never been emptied.
My wife rang the council and an official said he would get "The Green Bin Officer" to ring back.
We had a phone call the next day, not from the officer who was on holiday (it makes a change from being at a meeting or off sick) who said that they had no record of the green bin.
Not only that but that the computer did not indicate that the council had ever emptied our bin as the farm road was too narrow for the vehicle to access.
Now this is strange because a full sized bin wagon has emptied my bins since 1967 so it was strange to learn that the officer had no record of the bin wagon having visited my premises, in spite of their computer technology (no doubt requiring a "computer officer")
I believe he is to visit us to check whether the vehicle which has come down the drive for 40 years can actually do so. A nice hour out of the office for him.
Also for the last 10 months we have had a blue paper bin and a brown bottle bin provided by the council and which are emptied regularly as is the usual black wheely bin for general rubbish. Presumably these bins have their own controllers,(a blue, brown and black bin officer)but they don't know that we exist, in spite of emptying them.
I am a strong believer in recycling and I have no complaints at all with the service I get from the bin men, the people who actually do the work.
But times are hard and finances tight and cuts could have to be made.
I would expect these to fall on those at the bin face with fewer collections made.
Meanwhile I am sure all will be in order in the office and the various "officers" and "controllers" will continue to tap their keyboards and tick the requisite boxes at pay rates no doubt greater than those who actually do the donkey work.
All's well then
NO IT ISN'T!
This unimportant little episode indicates what is wrong with local and national government.
Many involved in controlling, discussing and record keeping --BUT FEW DOING THE WORK.
It can be put right, but will it?
I doubt it as those box tickers are the ones allocating the jobs and redundancies and you can be sure it will not be their jobs which will be lost.
IT WILL BE THE JOBS AT THE WORK FACE and the services which we want and pay for will deteriorate still further.
Thursday, 22 September 2011
A TOFF TALKS TOUGH
Is David Cameron completely round the twist.
Fresh from his not yet achieved victory against Gadaffi he is spouting about tackling other regimes he does not like.
Who does he think he is?
Does he not realise that we are broke with the FTSE dropping 5% just today and the world predicted to be close to economic catastrophe?
Has he forgotten that he has downsized our forces and left us without aircraft carriers and planes to fly from them?
Does he not even yet see the costs of his and Blair's interference in other countries business has cost us not only the lives of many soldiers and the maiming of many more?
Does he not see the costs of combatting the terrorism which these escapades have encouraged?
Does he not realise that the British electorate wish him to extricate us from the costly mistake which is the EU, and that we do not want war which does not concern us.
He talks about sanctions, military and economic against dictatorships in the interests of democratic rights.
He even mentions Syria, China and Russia. Jesus wept!
He must be out of his mind but while he is mad and elated at his victory over a thinly populated Libya and the wind in his sails, what about North Korea, Pakistan and Israel?
Will he tacke them? I doubt it.
The UN is a toothless tiger and would never unite in common cause in any conflict or measures against any of the above countries, so it would just be the USA and its poodle Britain.
We had difficulty in getting the go ahead even in little Libya and even the other countries of the EU were not persuaded.
He is basically a soft public schoolboy (tennis player says it all) trying to look tough. Unfortunately this attempt is at the expense of the lives and livelyhoods of other people.
So Mr Cameron, its time you realised that our country, thanks to you and your predecessor is as weak as the average toff and in no position to talk tough.
You should mind your own business and look after our country.
Let's have some justice and democracy here!
That is supposed to be your job.
Fresh from his not yet achieved victory against Gadaffi he is spouting about tackling other regimes he does not like.
Who does he think he is?
Does he not realise that we are broke with the FTSE dropping 5% just today and the world predicted to be close to economic catastrophe?
Has he forgotten that he has downsized our forces and left us without aircraft carriers and planes to fly from them?
Does he not even yet see the costs of his and Blair's interference in other countries business has cost us not only the lives of many soldiers and the maiming of many more?
Does he not see the costs of combatting the terrorism which these escapades have encouraged?
Does he not realise that the British electorate wish him to extricate us from the costly mistake which is the EU, and that we do not want war which does not concern us.
He talks about sanctions, military and economic against dictatorships in the interests of democratic rights.
He even mentions Syria, China and Russia. Jesus wept!
He must be out of his mind but while he is mad and elated at his victory over a thinly populated Libya and the wind in his sails, what about North Korea, Pakistan and Israel?
Will he tacke them? I doubt it.
The UN is a toothless tiger and would never unite in common cause in any conflict or measures against any of the above countries, so it would just be the USA and its poodle Britain.
We had difficulty in getting the go ahead even in little Libya and even the other countries of the EU were not persuaded.
He is basically a soft public schoolboy (tennis player says it all) trying to look tough. Unfortunately this attempt is at the expense of the lives and livelyhoods of other people.
So Mr Cameron, its time you realised that our country, thanks to you and your predecessor is as weak as the average toff and in no position to talk tough.
You should mind your own business and look after our country.
Let's have some justice and democracy here!
That is supposed to be your job.
IS IT BECAUSE I IS BLACK?
Two men were executed yesterday for murder in the USA.
One case well known and publicised in the media was Troy Davis was executed in Georgia.
There was a vociferous campaign against this execution but in spite of many appeals he was still found guilty.
Another man, not so well publicised was also executed on the same day.
No media tears for him.
His name Lawrence Brewer a white man and alleged member of the KKK who had killed a black man.
Now I, unlike many in the BNP am against the death penalty and thus oppose both of thease judicial killings, BUT why the difference in the publicity.
Many of those vociferously opposing Davis's execution do it on the grounds that they are against the death penalty and I can as I said sympathise with that.
But what about Lawrence Brewer?. Is his death less of a "crime" just because he is white and an alleged member of the KKK? Is the life of a black murderer of more import than that of a white murderer?
Was the campaign to save Davis "because he was black"?
Was the silence over Brewer because he was white?
It seems so.
One case well known and publicised in the media was Troy Davis was executed in Georgia.
There was a vociferous campaign against this execution but in spite of many appeals he was still found guilty.
Another man, not so well publicised was also executed on the same day.
No media tears for him.
His name Lawrence Brewer a white man and alleged member of the KKK who had killed a black man.
Now I, unlike many in the BNP am against the death penalty and thus oppose both of thease judicial killings, BUT why the difference in the publicity.
Many of those vociferously opposing Davis's execution do it on the grounds that they are against the death penalty and I can as I said sympathise with that.
But what about Lawrence Brewer?. Is his death less of a "crime" just because he is white and an alleged member of the KKK? Is the life of a black murderer of more import than that of a white murderer?
Was the campaign to save Davis "because he was black"?
Was the silence over Brewer because he was white?
It seems so.
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
DISGUSTED OF WIGAN
Three months too late and thanks to John Walker I heard the recording of the EGM held in St Helens (not Wigan) and I am indeed shocked at the antics of the Chairman and his sycophantic acolytes.
I was unfortunately on holiday at the time and thus unable to attend, although I was kept in touch by local activists.
Although I had heard some details I had not realised the depths to which the chairman had sunk to get his way and protect his job and the finances of his family.
The meeting was a travesty of the democratic process with the chairman exerting his absolute power and bringing his proxy votes in on a vote on a resolution which had been formulated the night before, which overrode the will of the attendees at the meeting.
The people giving those proxy votes did not know on what they were voting, having given those votes before the resolution was formulated.
Sensible points from the floor from Arthur Kemp, Andrew Brons and Richard Edmonds were swept aside by this undemocratic and unfair system of voting, and from the tape it seems that even those present were only given the options of voting for the least bad motion rather than the one they wanted.
The motions carried (with the aid of proxy votes) contradicted the will of the party as expressed by previous conferences and meetings. The will of the Party activists was cast aside by those who had no idea of the issues, but were voting members who foolishly gave their mandate to the chairman, having no knowledge of Party matters apart from the untrue and biased propaganda fed to them by the party machine.
The whole meeting was a charade, a pretence of democracy worthy only of a Stalinist state.
Our party is supposed to stand for democracy in Britain, but it seems that principle is not allowed in the running of the party itself.
The way the motions were manipulated was a disgrace and a banana republic would have been more honest.
No wonder membership and donations are haemorrhaging (in spite of what they would have us believe).
Formerly I believed Nick Griffin was God but now I see him as a cheat who has abused my faith in him and the faith of his followers.
He has also done the cause of Nationalism great harm and thus harmed our country and people.
For what?
I can only assume it is for his own financial gain, that is the least damaging interpretation I can put on it. One could imagine other motives of which I will not speak(yet).
The Party owes me £5000 which I loaned them before the Euro elections and which I have requested is returned without receiving a reply.
Will I continue to support nationalism? YES all the time.
Will I continue to support a party ( the BNP)run by a liar and a cheat who has used every devious method in the book to consolidate his position at the cost of bringing the party down?
YOU MUST BE JOKING!
But all is not lost, as with the demise of the present set up moves are afoot to resurrect a clean honest and ELECTABLE Nationalist party which with common sense will gain strength, following and influence and work to save our country, freed from the self aggrandisement and avarice which now invests what I once was proud to call my party.
Have no fear NATIONALISM WILL PREVAIL.
I was unfortunately on holiday at the time and thus unable to attend, although I was kept in touch by local activists.
Although I had heard some details I had not realised the depths to which the chairman had sunk to get his way and protect his job and the finances of his family.
The meeting was a travesty of the democratic process with the chairman exerting his absolute power and bringing his proxy votes in on a vote on a resolution which had been formulated the night before, which overrode the will of the attendees at the meeting.
The people giving those proxy votes did not know on what they were voting, having given those votes before the resolution was formulated.
Sensible points from the floor from Arthur Kemp, Andrew Brons and Richard Edmonds were swept aside by this undemocratic and unfair system of voting, and from the tape it seems that even those present were only given the options of voting for the least bad motion rather than the one they wanted.
The motions carried (with the aid of proxy votes) contradicted the will of the party as expressed by previous conferences and meetings. The will of the Party activists was cast aside by those who had no idea of the issues, but were voting members who foolishly gave their mandate to the chairman, having no knowledge of Party matters apart from the untrue and biased propaganda fed to them by the party machine.
The whole meeting was a charade, a pretence of democracy worthy only of a Stalinist state.
Our party is supposed to stand for democracy in Britain, but it seems that principle is not allowed in the running of the party itself.
The way the motions were manipulated was a disgrace and a banana republic would have been more honest.
No wonder membership and donations are haemorrhaging (in spite of what they would have us believe).
Formerly I believed Nick Griffin was God but now I see him as a cheat who has abused my faith in him and the faith of his followers.
He has also done the cause of Nationalism great harm and thus harmed our country and people.
For what?
I can only assume it is for his own financial gain, that is the least damaging interpretation I can put on it. One could imagine other motives of which I will not speak(yet).
The Party owes me £5000 which I loaned them before the Euro elections and which I have requested is returned without receiving a reply.
Will I continue to support nationalism? YES all the time.
Will I continue to support a party ( the BNP)run by a liar and a cheat who has used every devious method in the book to consolidate his position at the cost of bringing the party down?
YOU MUST BE JOKING!
But all is not lost, as with the demise of the present set up moves are afoot to resurrect a clean honest and ELECTABLE Nationalist party which with common sense will gain strength, following and influence and work to save our country, freed from the self aggrandisement and avarice which now invests what I once was proud to call my party.
Have no fear NATIONALISM WILL PREVAIL.
EXPERTS WRONG AGAIN.
The news today that Government debt in August rose to record levels does not surprise me, even though the recent financial disasters seem to have surprised the "experts".
One reason given for this is that the government tax take has been less than expected. Taxes may have to rise it is said or QE (printing money).
All this rubbish shows how incompetent those in power are.
One thing I agree with Vince Cable about is that we are entering the financial equivalent of a war.
So how do we get this ever increasing debt burden reduced? It is so obvious.
Spend less.
Now that does not mean cutting essential services nor pushing people into poverty It just means spending on things and goods which give us a return.
Thus the money wasted on "Human Rights" could be stopped. Gypsies could be ejected from their illegal sites without vast expenditure. Illegal immigrants, especially those who have committed criminal acts could be instantly deported and the doors closed to ALL further immigration.
Legal aid and translation services for foreigners could be STOPPED as could all benefits and medical treatment.
Foreign wars should cease.
The EU should be exited.
Spending on non essential council and government services should be stopped.
Equalities legislation should be abolished.
The Global Warming scam should be ignored, reducing fuel prices and the burden it places on our industries.
Foreign aid should be STOPPED.
A recent survey showed that the per capita GDP in Britain was lower than other Western countries. That does not mean that the average worker does not work as hard or is more unproductive than his foreign counterparts. It just means that there are too many useless jobs which we could do without but which are paid for out of the productive workers on whom our national wellbeing depends.
I was recently in Germany, a country with a high standard of living and contrary to what we are told they do not work harder. They just have to carry fewer government paid parasites and thus more of their national effort goes into productive work.
They also have little vandalism and a patriotic outlook and buy German products when possible, creating a virtuous circle of industry and prosperity.
There are far too many non essential positions whose absence we would not miss. We could have the same standard of living with less work if that work had a tangible benefit.
I believe the government should thus take the measures outlined above and kick start the economy by large infrastructure projects, transport, construction, sea defences etc which would with a multiplier effect create millions of jobs (and a larger tax take).
Our coal industry could be resurrected and our power generation brought back under British NATIONAL ownership.
We would also get something back for our money in an improved environment, unlike the many PC jobs which are a cost with no return.
Will they implement some or any of these proposals? Not yet, but they will have to do something when the Euro goes down and the s**t really does hit the fan.
I am thus pessimistic in the short term but in the long term I am guardedly optimistic as even the ignorant unscientific morons now in control will be forced to do the right thing by our country and people, but I hope it will not be too late.
And then--
WE MAY BE ABLE TO RETIRE AT 65.
One reason given for this is that the government tax take has been less than expected. Taxes may have to rise it is said or QE (printing money).
All this rubbish shows how incompetent those in power are.
One thing I agree with Vince Cable about is that we are entering the financial equivalent of a war.
So how do we get this ever increasing debt burden reduced? It is so obvious.
Spend less.
Now that does not mean cutting essential services nor pushing people into poverty It just means spending on things and goods which give us a return.
Thus the money wasted on "Human Rights" could be stopped. Gypsies could be ejected from their illegal sites without vast expenditure. Illegal immigrants, especially those who have committed criminal acts could be instantly deported and the doors closed to ALL further immigration.
Legal aid and translation services for foreigners could be STOPPED as could all benefits and medical treatment.
Foreign wars should cease.
The EU should be exited.
Spending on non essential council and government services should be stopped.
Equalities legislation should be abolished.
The Global Warming scam should be ignored, reducing fuel prices and the burden it places on our industries.
Foreign aid should be STOPPED.
A recent survey showed that the per capita GDP in Britain was lower than other Western countries. That does not mean that the average worker does not work as hard or is more unproductive than his foreign counterparts. It just means that there are too many useless jobs which we could do without but which are paid for out of the productive workers on whom our national wellbeing depends.
I was recently in Germany, a country with a high standard of living and contrary to what we are told they do not work harder. They just have to carry fewer government paid parasites and thus more of their national effort goes into productive work.
They also have little vandalism and a patriotic outlook and buy German products when possible, creating a virtuous circle of industry and prosperity.
There are far too many non essential positions whose absence we would not miss. We could have the same standard of living with less work if that work had a tangible benefit.
I believe the government should thus take the measures outlined above and kick start the economy by large infrastructure projects, transport, construction, sea defences etc which would with a multiplier effect create millions of jobs (and a larger tax take).
Our coal industry could be resurrected and our power generation brought back under British NATIONAL ownership.
We would also get something back for our money in an improved environment, unlike the many PC jobs which are a cost with no return.
Will they implement some or any of these proposals? Not yet, but they will have to do something when the Euro goes down and the s**t really does hit the fan.
I am thus pessimistic in the short term but in the long term I am guardedly optimistic as even the ignorant unscientific morons now in control will be forced to do the right thing by our country and people, but I hope it will not be too late.
And then--
WE MAY BE ABLE TO RETIRE AT 65.
Tuesday, 20 September 2011
UNEQUAL EQUALITY
The shambles at the attempted eviction of the "travellers" from the illegal Dale Farm site says much about what's wrong with our society.
Like many of those groups who seem to have preference in our society they want it both ways.
They want and are given ethnic minority status, in itself a scam perpetrated by the equality industry which far from promoting equality gives these groups preference.
Hardly equality.
They are not even an identifiable ethnic group. They are a bunch of Irish people, who in their wish to benefit from a tax free life roam OUR countryside doing jobs cash in hand.
They are also non travelling travellers, who it seems do not want to travel but to settle down in permanent houses, a contradiction I think. In any case for people whose way of life is travelling it is strange and ironic that they own valuable properties in Ireland.
Whe I went to Ireland 35 years ago there were many travellers there who occupied various bits of unused land. Each different group had a speciality. Some of these untidy encampments specialised in wheels, others in machinery and others in scrap iron etc, a difficult thing to do if you are travelling.
Nowadays there is little evidence of travellers infesting Ireland. The Irish government became fed up with them and legislated against them and that country became a lot tidier as a result, but the trash which inhabited them came to Britain.
Now we have a plague in our land, unwanted by 99% of the people, fed up of the filth left behind when they do travel and are moved on and the thieving which occurs when they are in the vicinity.
Local people are threatened with violence when they protest.
The main reason that this has become a problem apart from idiotic PC laws giving them preference is the indolence of local authorities.
The travellers know the law, even though they do not abide by it. They set up camp on playing fields on a Friday night knowing that no one from the local authority will be on duty to eject them until Monday and that they will be given notice at great cost in legal fees (to the council)
Afterwards when they have moved on the local authority is faced with the filth they have left behind and must pay extra bonuses to workers to clean it up.
The farce at Dale Farm and the alleged 10 million it has so far cost is down to incompetence and lawyers fat fees.
The council should have gone in hard quickly and stopped this unauthorised camp and bulldozed the buildings. Electricity and water should have been cut off (do they pay for this?).
Even this week the council gave notice of the time the bailiffs were to go in, giving the pikeys time to prepare and to invite the scum of the earth to assist them.
If they had gone in sooner as soon as the order had been given it would have all been over now.
I have been involved twice with the stopping of illegal travellers and know of others.
The way to get them off, within hours is to go in hard and let them know that they will not see the night out on that field. When they see you mean business they move off quickly, but then the local authorities are too indolent and PC and thus we the taxpayers are left with astronomic bills.
I believe this rabble should have their vehicles confiscated to pay for the costs of their removal and this would be a deterrant to other such scum from trying these tactics elsewhere.
AND if thay really need somewhere to park their caravans I am sure that wealthy communists such as Vanessa Redgrave have land to where they could be relocated.
NOW TO THE ANARCHISTS.
Anarchists by definition believe in the law. They are however keen to use it at the slightist opportunity to protest at (police brutality) again having it both ways.
If you want the protection of the law you should abide by it.
If you, being an anarchist and thus not believing in the law ,you in my opinion put yourself outside the law and anything you get you have brought on yourselves.
So they should all be arrested and locked up for aiding an illegal act and their dole stopped as they have no intention of working.
The above is just an isolated if large incident of similar ones all over the country.
Think how much money could be saved if the authorities acted.
Some local communities have acted directly and stopped this scourge.
They have shown how it can be done.
Now it's up to the councils.
P.S Remember Codnor? We were only allowed six caravans on a field over a mile from the village for our RWB weekend fest. Any more and the police would have moved in immediately.
We were not even allowed to have an unamplified guitar solo 600 yards from the next building and the country lane.The police and council officials came in at 10 pm and stopped it.
SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS and it's not us.
Like many of those groups who seem to have preference in our society they want it both ways.
They want and are given ethnic minority status, in itself a scam perpetrated by the equality industry which far from promoting equality gives these groups preference.
Hardly equality.
They are not even an identifiable ethnic group. They are a bunch of Irish people, who in their wish to benefit from a tax free life roam OUR countryside doing jobs cash in hand.
They are also non travelling travellers, who it seems do not want to travel but to settle down in permanent houses, a contradiction I think. In any case for people whose way of life is travelling it is strange and ironic that they own valuable properties in Ireland.
Whe I went to Ireland 35 years ago there were many travellers there who occupied various bits of unused land. Each different group had a speciality. Some of these untidy encampments specialised in wheels, others in machinery and others in scrap iron etc, a difficult thing to do if you are travelling.
Nowadays there is little evidence of travellers infesting Ireland. The Irish government became fed up with them and legislated against them and that country became a lot tidier as a result, but the trash which inhabited them came to Britain.
Now we have a plague in our land, unwanted by 99% of the people, fed up of the filth left behind when they do travel and are moved on and the thieving which occurs when they are in the vicinity.
Local people are threatened with violence when they protest.
The main reason that this has become a problem apart from idiotic PC laws giving them preference is the indolence of local authorities.
The travellers know the law, even though they do not abide by it. They set up camp on playing fields on a Friday night knowing that no one from the local authority will be on duty to eject them until Monday and that they will be given notice at great cost in legal fees (to the council)
Afterwards when they have moved on the local authority is faced with the filth they have left behind and must pay extra bonuses to workers to clean it up.
The farce at Dale Farm and the alleged 10 million it has so far cost is down to incompetence and lawyers fat fees.
The council should have gone in hard quickly and stopped this unauthorised camp and bulldozed the buildings. Electricity and water should have been cut off (do they pay for this?).
Even this week the council gave notice of the time the bailiffs were to go in, giving the pikeys time to prepare and to invite the scum of the earth to assist them.
If they had gone in sooner as soon as the order had been given it would have all been over now.
I have been involved twice with the stopping of illegal travellers and know of others.
The way to get them off, within hours is to go in hard and let them know that they will not see the night out on that field. When they see you mean business they move off quickly, but then the local authorities are too indolent and PC and thus we the taxpayers are left with astronomic bills.
I believe this rabble should have their vehicles confiscated to pay for the costs of their removal and this would be a deterrant to other such scum from trying these tactics elsewhere.
AND if thay really need somewhere to park their caravans I am sure that wealthy communists such as Vanessa Redgrave have land to where they could be relocated.
NOW TO THE ANARCHISTS.
Anarchists by definition believe in the law. They are however keen to use it at the slightist opportunity to protest at (police brutality) again having it both ways.
If you want the protection of the law you should abide by it.
If you, being an anarchist and thus not believing in the law ,you in my opinion put yourself outside the law and anything you get you have brought on yourselves.
So they should all be arrested and locked up for aiding an illegal act and their dole stopped as they have no intention of working.
The above is just an isolated if large incident of similar ones all over the country.
Think how much money could be saved if the authorities acted.
Some local communities have acted directly and stopped this scourge.
They have shown how it can be done.
Now it's up to the councils.
P.S Remember Codnor? We were only allowed six caravans on a field over a mile from the village for our RWB weekend fest. Any more and the police would have moved in immediately.
We were not even allowed to have an unamplified guitar solo 600 yards from the next building and the country lane.The police and council officials came in at 10 pm and stopped it.
SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS and it's not us.
BRITISH HISTORY TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS - A THING OF THE PAST.
The continual erosion of the British identity started by the traitorous New Labour still continues under the ConDem(ned) govt.
When will our children be taught about their country and it's people, past and identity? A lack of historical knowledge about ones own country and culture leaves a gaping hole which can be filled with new immigrant history and culture at the sake of ones own identity. As can be seen with our History now being taught with Geography/Humanities as a combined subject.
"Research shows that rising numbers of pupils are receiving just two years of compulsory lessons during secondary education instead of the recommended three because of pressure on school timetables.
When will our children be taught about their country and it's people, past and identity? A lack of historical knowledge about ones own country and culture leaves a gaping hole which can be filled with new immigrant history and culture at the sake of ones own identity. As can be seen with our History now being taught with Geography/Humanities as a combined subject.
"Research shows that rising numbers of pupils are receiving just two years of compulsory lessons during secondary education instead of the recommended three because of pressure on school timetables.
According to figures, many schools fail to offer history as a discreet subject at all – often merging it with geography to form generic “humanities” lessons.
It also emerged that some head teachers ban pupils from choosing history at GCSE-level amid fears they will fail to gain good grades – damaging schools’ league table rankings.
The disclosure is made in a study by the Historical Association that will raise fresh fears over the future of the subject in English state schools.
It follows the publication of separate figures this summer showing that the overall proportion of pupils studying the subject in state comprehensives dropped by almost a fifth under Labour.
The Coalition is attempting to reverse the decline by introducing the controversial “English Baccalaureate” – a school leaving certificate that rewards pupils who gain good GCSEs in traditional academic disciplines. To qualify, teenagers must score C grades in five subjects, including history or geography.
But the latest study suggests the reforms have made “little impression so far”.
The Historical Association surveyed teachers in 403 secondary schools and colleges as part of an annual poll.
Currently, pupils are supposed to take history throughout Key Stage 3 – the first three years of secondary education – before being allowed to drop it at GCSE aged around 14.
But the study found 11.7 per cent of schools now squeezed Key Stage 3 into just two years to give pupils more time on their GCSE studies. This compares with 10.5 per cent a year earlier.
Researchers said almost a quarter of schools failed to teach history as a separate subject at all. In many cases, schools offered it as part of combined humanities classes, alongside geography.
One-in-five schools also said the amount of history taught to first year pupils had been cut this year compared with 2010.
In a further conclusion, some 16 per cent of schools said they put “restrictions” on the number of pupils who could study GCSEs in history, with poor performers often pushed onto alternative courses or vocational qualifications.
“In some cases, the cut-off was defined in statistical terms, with the lowest ability group being barred or only the top sets offered the opportunity,” said the study."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8774758/History-lessons-squeezed-out-of-crowded-timetables.html
Saturday, 17 September 2011
I AM THE INFIDEL YOUR (IMAM WARNED ABOUT)
I AM THE INFIDEL YOUR (IMAM WARNED ABOUT) - Joe Dan Gorman
Friday, 16 September 2011
THE FUTURE FOR NATIONALISM
With the turmoil in the country with riots perpetrated , mainly by blacks with some help from the white underclass, and increasing unemployment and the prospects of a financial meltdown one could ask why the support for the "main" parties remaines solid.
The Tories, or true consevatives do not like Cameron who is seen as a weak elitist with no notion of the meaning of conservativism. He is presiding over the destruction of our society as did his predecessor Brown, and conserving nothing.
Labour still has many staunch adherents (for traditional reasons) in spite of that party betraying the grass roots of the founding members with their getting into bed with millionaires and wealthy bankers, and allowing millions of immigrants to take priority in jobs and housing.
Their leader is uncharismatic and trusted by no one.
The Lib Dems hardly warrant comment having few policies apart from their pro Euro and immigrant stance and their leader will in all likelyhood lose his seat at the next election for betraying his constituents.
So come an election what are the many who despair of our country and the betrayal by the major parties to do?
Few are satisfied by these parties and vote for them because they see no alternative.
Some speak of Farage and his tin pot UKIP which although supposedly anti EU has no other policies. Farage himself has an irritating demeanour which annoys people and puts them off voting for him
That leaves us, as an alternative vehicle with policies which DO resonate with voters.
So why do they not vote for us?
One reason is that they see the chaos in our party and think if we are not able to run a small organisation such as ours efficiently we are not fit to run the country. There is a logic to this opinion.
But FAR more serious is the fact that many say they would vote for us with another leader.
THEY DO NOT LIKE NICK GRIFFIN and he is thus an impediment on our progress.
As a person I like him in spite of his renaging on past promises and his over ruling of the Party's democratic decisions. He has done a lot for our party but he should see if he has any political instinct that it is time for him to step down.
I am sure he has that instinct and knows that his continual clinging on to power is in his own interests and not those of nationalism.
Thus , in spite of what he has done he is hastening the Party's demise.
He should remember however that for all he has achieved for nationalism he has not done it alone. To negate the hard work of hundreds of dedicated workers is inexcusable.
Yes he has built the Party up, but it does not belong to him and he should remember that and resign in the interests of both party and country.
We should be making big strides now. All the indications are in our favour, but we are becoming sidelined and IGNORED.
Our bye election results are abysmal when we should be progressing strongly.
Perhaps he does not know it, beingsurrounded by sychophants whose position depends on saying the right things to him, but he should be made to realise the true collapse of the Party.
The time is ripe for a nationalist resurgence. Many people wish to join, but again and again they say they will not join if Nick is the leader.
In Wigan we have twenty people who wish to join but are waiting for a new leader and a clean hierarchy. These people, many of them potential activists will not join as yet.
I am sure this situation is replicated across the country.
The people NEED a voice. We should be providing it and we are not.
Our party with its present set up is letting our country down, but we will not grow as we should until the management and leadership is rectified.
Individually there is only a little each of us can do. We are the small fry, but Nick Griffin could save our party by stepping down.
Then all those expelled (the best in the Party) would come back and form a nucleus around which all those who seek a patriotic political home can gather and I believe the sky would be the limit.
At present our party has become a laughing stock at best and at worst ignored.
We have the potential. The people need us.
All we need is a new management and leader.
For our country's sake, PLEASE LET US HAVE IT!
The Tories, or true consevatives do not like Cameron who is seen as a weak elitist with no notion of the meaning of conservativism. He is presiding over the destruction of our society as did his predecessor Brown, and conserving nothing.
Labour still has many staunch adherents (for traditional reasons) in spite of that party betraying the grass roots of the founding members with their getting into bed with millionaires and wealthy bankers, and allowing millions of immigrants to take priority in jobs and housing.
Their leader is uncharismatic and trusted by no one.
The Lib Dems hardly warrant comment having few policies apart from their pro Euro and immigrant stance and their leader will in all likelyhood lose his seat at the next election for betraying his constituents.
So come an election what are the many who despair of our country and the betrayal by the major parties to do?
Few are satisfied by these parties and vote for them because they see no alternative.
Some speak of Farage and his tin pot UKIP which although supposedly anti EU has no other policies. Farage himself has an irritating demeanour which annoys people and puts them off voting for him
That leaves us, as an alternative vehicle with policies which DO resonate with voters.
So why do they not vote for us?
One reason is that they see the chaos in our party and think if we are not able to run a small organisation such as ours efficiently we are not fit to run the country. There is a logic to this opinion.
But FAR more serious is the fact that many say they would vote for us with another leader.
THEY DO NOT LIKE NICK GRIFFIN and he is thus an impediment on our progress.
As a person I like him in spite of his renaging on past promises and his over ruling of the Party's democratic decisions. He has done a lot for our party but he should see if he has any political instinct that it is time for him to step down.
I am sure he has that instinct and knows that his continual clinging on to power is in his own interests and not those of nationalism.
Thus , in spite of what he has done he is hastening the Party's demise.
He should remember however that for all he has achieved for nationalism he has not done it alone. To negate the hard work of hundreds of dedicated workers is inexcusable.
Yes he has built the Party up, but it does not belong to him and he should remember that and resign in the interests of both party and country.
We should be making big strides now. All the indications are in our favour, but we are becoming sidelined and IGNORED.
Our bye election results are abysmal when we should be progressing strongly.
Perhaps he does not know it, beingsurrounded by sychophants whose position depends on saying the right things to him, but he should be made to realise the true collapse of the Party.
The time is ripe for a nationalist resurgence. Many people wish to join, but again and again they say they will not join if Nick is the leader.
In Wigan we have twenty people who wish to join but are waiting for a new leader and a clean hierarchy. These people, many of them potential activists will not join as yet.
I am sure this situation is replicated across the country.
The people NEED a voice. We should be providing it and we are not.
Our party with its present set up is letting our country down, but we will not grow as we should until the management and leadership is rectified.
Individually there is only a little each of us can do. We are the small fry, but Nick Griffin could save our party by stepping down.
Then all those expelled (the best in the Party) would come back and form a nucleus around which all those who seek a patriotic political home can gather and I believe the sky would be the limit.
At present our party has become a laughing stock at best and at worst ignored.
We have the potential. The people need us.
All we need is a new management and leader.
For our country's sake, PLEASE LET US HAVE IT!
Thursday, 15 September 2011
RETIRE AT 67, NOT A GOOD IDEA.
About forty years ago when I was a young councillor after meetings we discussed the future.
At that time in a period of full employment but rapidly increasing automation the topic was what would happen if/when millions of people were displaced from their work in the manufacturing industries we then had.
Some would be taken up it was considered by shortening the working week, sharing out the work and allowing people more leisure.
This to a degree has happened. The average working week has been reduced from Forty nine hours a week to less than forty (for manual workers).
Kids of today can not believe that Saturday morning working was the norm.
Since then we have lost millions of jobs in mining, manufacturing shipbuilding, fishing, steel and farming as well as many other productive industries.
In addition computers arrived which supposedly reduced the requirement for office workers, although their benefits in this respect are debatable.
Where did all these jobs go? I realise that thanks to the greedy globalist bankers and City types much of manufacturing has been outsourced to countries of the Far East, so where do those displaced from useful work now find employment.
Well, some in service industries such as restaurants but even these types of jobs have been to a degree lost because of foreign travel (think Blackpool boarding house owners and the closure of small shops as a result of supermarkets))
Many have been recruited into the plethora of government non jobs such as diversity officers and outreach co ordinators and paid for by the taxpayer. This put an additional burden on the remaining productive industries, undermining their competitiveness and hastening their demise.
Thus we have had for thirty years an accelerating reduction in productive capacity, growing unemployment and millions of new alien people many of whom do not work.
I now come to the point of this little diatribe.
WE are now told that the retirement age will be increased to 67, in stages as people are living longer. I do of course accept this last fact.
However if people have worked hard all their lives I believe they are entitled to some leisure at the end of it.
Also, if people are expected to work two extra years (women seven) it should be asked in what capacity these people to be employed?
Most manufacturing processes not outsourced are comprehensively automated and increasingly so, thus requiring few extra workers.
We could of course bring back to our country much of the heavy manufacturing industry we GAVE away and although a good idea that has not been mentioned as a solution.
So what are we left with to employ people for another two years?
All I can see is ticking boxes in an overblown non productive State sector as other jobs are not there. As well as that there are over two million young people who have been poorly educated in the wrong subjects languishing on the dole who would be admirably suited to this important function if required.
But that is not the main reason for this brilliant idea.
Pensions pay more than unemployment benefit so those who would today be classed as pensioners would be reclassified as unemployed and thus cheaper. There would be no more people in work than there are now, it would just mean that the unemployed would cost less, but not that much less as dole is still a cost to the State.
Everyone accepts that the huge demographic problem of a naging population must mean a different solution to that of the past. Is there an answer?
Yes I believe there is.
Most of our daily needs can be provided with a fraction of the work than was necessary in the pre computer and automated days, and can be provided for by a better allocation of resources.
We should exit the EU, control our fisheries, halt immigration and handouts to so called asylum seekers, halt foreign aid and wars. These measures would pay for people's retirement several times over. Remember those now of retirement age paid their taxes which have been wasted by government extravagence.
There should be no need in a modern industrialised country for people to work until they drop.
There is more to life than toil and in any case after fifty years of work a few years of rest have been well earned.
Until we get a competent and honest government and an electorate which can see through the garbage peddled by it we will have to suffer these fools.
However big changes are afoot and the people will become increasingly restive all over Europe as evidenced by the panic by the incompetent thieves as yet in control at the implications of the inevitable Greek default.
THERE IS STILL HOPE.
At that time in a period of full employment but rapidly increasing automation the topic was what would happen if/when millions of people were displaced from their work in the manufacturing industries we then had.
Some would be taken up it was considered by shortening the working week, sharing out the work and allowing people more leisure.
This to a degree has happened. The average working week has been reduced from Forty nine hours a week to less than forty (for manual workers).
Kids of today can not believe that Saturday morning working was the norm.
Since then we have lost millions of jobs in mining, manufacturing shipbuilding, fishing, steel and farming as well as many other productive industries.
In addition computers arrived which supposedly reduced the requirement for office workers, although their benefits in this respect are debatable.
Where did all these jobs go? I realise that thanks to the greedy globalist bankers and City types much of manufacturing has been outsourced to countries of the Far East, so where do those displaced from useful work now find employment.
Well, some in service industries such as restaurants but even these types of jobs have been to a degree lost because of foreign travel (think Blackpool boarding house owners and the closure of small shops as a result of supermarkets))
Many have been recruited into the plethora of government non jobs such as diversity officers and outreach co ordinators and paid for by the taxpayer. This put an additional burden on the remaining productive industries, undermining their competitiveness and hastening their demise.
Thus we have had for thirty years an accelerating reduction in productive capacity, growing unemployment and millions of new alien people many of whom do not work.
I now come to the point of this little diatribe.
WE are now told that the retirement age will be increased to 67, in stages as people are living longer. I do of course accept this last fact.
However if people have worked hard all their lives I believe they are entitled to some leisure at the end of it.
Also, if people are expected to work two extra years (women seven) it should be asked in what capacity these people to be employed?
Most manufacturing processes not outsourced are comprehensively automated and increasingly so, thus requiring few extra workers.
We could of course bring back to our country much of the heavy manufacturing industry we GAVE away and although a good idea that has not been mentioned as a solution.
So what are we left with to employ people for another two years?
All I can see is ticking boxes in an overblown non productive State sector as other jobs are not there. As well as that there are over two million young people who have been poorly educated in the wrong subjects languishing on the dole who would be admirably suited to this important function if required.
But that is not the main reason for this brilliant idea.
Pensions pay more than unemployment benefit so those who would today be classed as pensioners would be reclassified as unemployed and thus cheaper. There would be no more people in work than there are now, it would just mean that the unemployed would cost less, but not that much less as dole is still a cost to the State.
Everyone accepts that the huge demographic problem of a naging population must mean a different solution to that of the past. Is there an answer?
Yes I believe there is.
Most of our daily needs can be provided with a fraction of the work than was necessary in the pre computer and automated days, and can be provided for by a better allocation of resources.
We should exit the EU, control our fisheries, halt immigration and handouts to so called asylum seekers, halt foreign aid and wars. These measures would pay for people's retirement several times over. Remember those now of retirement age paid their taxes which have been wasted by government extravagence.
There should be no need in a modern industrialised country for people to work until they drop.
There is more to life than toil and in any case after fifty years of work a few years of rest have been well earned.
Until we get a competent and honest government and an electorate which can see through the garbage peddled by it we will have to suffer these fools.
However big changes are afoot and the people will become increasingly restive all over Europe as evidenced by the panic by the incompetent thieves as yet in control at the implications of the inevitable Greek default.
THERE IS STILL HOPE.
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
THE RISE OF THE EDL
Two hundred years ago the rulers of our country, the aristocrats had one great fear. That of the mob, that unrepresented downtrodden mass of people who had been deprived of their rights for the benefit of the rich.
To allay this threat gradually they gave concessions culminating in enfranchisement for all adults in Britain and thus all seemed to be settled.
The masses were happy. They had the vote which they had never had before and believed they were free to build a society which they wanted.
Apart from a brief period after WW2 they were deluded in this belief.
The same people still rule us as did before, and treat us with the same contempt as did the Victorian aristocrats.
In other words we were cheated.
We were told we had democracy even as our wishes were ignored.
The Labour Party, once the great hope of the British working people was even then controlled by those brought up to privelidge who thought in their arrogance that they knew what was best for the people.
There were a few people from ordinary backgrounds in that post war government who could relate to the British people, Bevan and Bevin for example but they were few. These politicians were patriots who believed in those who elected them and their country.
Yes some of their ideas were subsequently shown to be wrong but they were formulated on the principles of what was best for the average British person.
Subsequently we have suffered by politicians in the job for selfish gain or to ingratiate themselves with the wealthy people in the City of London.
Some were beguiled by the anti British Communist Soviet block and put policies in place which reflected that.
What we have never had since 1950 is a party or government which put our people first.
Both major parties, as a sop to the industrialists allowed a massive influx of aliens to our country allowing wages to be kept down. They also gave citizenship to these aliens causing the problems Enoch Powell predicted and for which he was ostracised and sacked.
The descent into chaos continues, but then the "elites" of both Tories and Labour do not have to compete with these usurpers for jobs nor live in close proximity with these aliens.
Some union bosses I accept welcome them as through immigration they gain members, never mind that the conditions of their members are worsened as a result.
Those controlloing our country have been infiltrated by the "Common Purpose" group, a shadowy association, devoted to global capitalism and inimicable to the patriotic instincts and desires of the British people.
The elites know this and even if not in this secetive and subversive association are not concerned as it serves their purpose, that is the destructioin of our national identity in the name of globalism which suits them and their friends in the banking "industry"
We have lost our freedom of speech and to complain about this democratic deficit is to invite a visit from the police for "racism" when all we want is our country for us.
We are in effect pawns.
Other countries such as South Korea, Japan and even the communist but nationalist state of China protect the rights of their citizens and allow preference for them.
Why is it that we are not able or allowed to prioritise our own kith and kin as others do?
We have become as disenfranchised as our ancestors were two hundred ago and the might of the state bears down upon us if we complain.
Going back to the fear of the mob, the EDL are growing and although I believe they are good patriots and have the guts to openly protest they are a symptom of the deficiency of our so called democracy.
If those who rule over us will not heed the will of the people and discriminate against us in the media and by legal means the motivation for direct action will grow, as will the EDL. Good luck to them.
Our people won our freedom in the past and will do so again.
Our freedom was hard won.
WE WILL NOT GIVE IT UP WITHOUT A FIGHT.
To allay this threat gradually they gave concessions culminating in enfranchisement for all adults in Britain and thus all seemed to be settled.
The masses were happy. They had the vote which they had never had before and believed they were free to build a society which they wanted.
Apart from a brief period after WW2 they were deluded in this belief.
The same people still rule us as did before, and treat us with the same contempt as did the Victorian aristocrats.
In other words we were cheated.
We were told we had democracy even as our wishes were ignored.
The Labour Party, once the great hope of the British working people was even then controlled by those brought up to privelidge who thought in their arrogance that they knew what was best for the people.
There were a few people from ordinary backgrounds in that post war government who could relate to the British people, Bevan and Bevin for example but they were few. These politicians were patriots who believed in those who elected them and their country.
Yes some of their ideas were subsequently shown to be wrong but they were formulated on the principles of what was best for the average British person.
Subsequently we have suffered by politicians in the job for selfish gain or to ingratiate themselves with the wealthy people in the City of London.
Some were beguiled by the anti British Communist Soviet block and put policies in place which reflected that.
What we have never had since 1950 is a party or government which put our people first.
Both major parties, as a sop to the industrialists allowed a massive influx of aliens to our country allowing wages to be kept down. They also gave citizenship to these aliens causing the problems Enoch Powell predicted and for which he was ostracised and sacked.
The descent into chaos continues, but then the "elites" of both Tories and Labour do not have to compete with these usurpers for jobs nor live in close proximity with these aliens.
Some union bosses I accept welcome them as through immigration they gain members, never mind that the conditions of their members are worsened as a result.
Those controlloing our country have been infiltrated by the "Common Purpose" group, a shadowy association, devoted to global capitalism and inimicable to the patriotic instincts and desires of the British people.
The elites know this and even if not in this secetive and subversive association are not concerned as it serves their purpose, that is the destructioin of our national identity in the name of globalism which suits them and their friends in the banking "industry"
We have lost our freedom of speech and to complain about this democratic deficit is to invite a visit from the police for "racism" when all we want is our country for us.
We are in effect pawns.
Other countries such as South Korea, Japan and even the communist but nationalist state of China protect the rights of their citizens and allow preference for them.
Why is it that we are not able or allowed to prioritise our own kith and kin as others do?
We have become as disenfranchised as our ancestors were two hundred ago and the might of the state bears down upon us if we complain.
Going back to the fear of the mob, the EDL are growing and although I believe they are good patriots and have the guts to openly protest they are a symptom of the deficiency of our so called democracy.
If those who rule over us will not heed the will of the people and discriminate against us in the media and by legal means the motivation for direct action will grow, as will the EDL. Good luck to them.
Our people won our freedom in the past and will do so again.
Our freedom was hard won.
WE WILL NOT GIVE IT UP WITHOUT A FIGHT.
Monday, 12 September 2011
POLITICAL POLICING
STASI BRITAIN 2011
This is POLITICAL POLICING and reminiscent of EAST GERMANY.
We do not have Police upholding the law against ISLAMISTS yet the INDIGENOUS BRITISH are the ones who are being oppressed and persecuted by the STATE PARAMILITARY STASI.
Saturday, 10 September 2011
RIOTS IN CAIRO
The anti Israel riots in Cairo could have been predicted as soon as Mubarak had been deposed in the so called "Arab Spring" in that country.
The uneasy peace between Egypt and Israel maintained by American arms to Israel and money to the Egyptian puppet leader have until now kept the pressure cooker contained.
Governments in the West welcomed a new democracy in Egypt just as they will welcome the downfall of Ghadaffi when eventually, aided by mainly British and French forces he is overthrown.
But what do these supposed intelligent politicians expect to replace these tyrranies? Democracy?
No. The inhabitants of these countries have no culture of democracy, like all other Arab countries. They are still mired in their medieval creed and are also tribal.
However whichever tribe they belong to they are united in their adherence to islam and a visceral hatred to the perceived and largely true injustice perpetrated on the Palestinians by the Western financed Jewish state.
Israel is of course much more democratic than any Arab state(not hard) even though it is not completely democratic and treats the indigenous Palestinians as second class citizens.
The Arabs have much greater numbers and think they can wipe Israel out.
If they do they are deluding themselves.
Israel, even without American help is a sophisticated society, populated by intelligent people with many scientists and can easily hold its own.
The Egyptian army is in effect a rabble, disorganised and ill led. However large it is it has no chance of resisting Israeli might.
Why do I mention these events?
Because they do not concern us and we should for once keep our nose out. Help neither side and leave them to it.
That way we will not incur the ire of the Arab countries or their sleepers in our country.
Israel would win any war and do not need us. If they did lose that would not matter so much to us. Muslims would not flock here as a result. so myself I would not care either way.
I would take the attitude of the countries which are now overtaking us in the economic stakes China, India and Russia and ignore the whole situation.
In the aftermath of any conflict we could be friendly with the winner to our economic advantage.
These views may not seem "ethical". They are not meant to be.
My view is what is best for Britain is paramount.
Blair and Cameron have hardly been "ethical" and their policies have been responsible for hundreds of thousands of people's deaths.
My ideas would not involve loss of life and they would help to ensure the survival of OUR people and the financial viability of OUR country, which I believe is more ethical than policies perpetrated by these so called "leaders"
The uneasy peace between Egypt and Israel maintained by American arms to Israel and money to the Egyptian puppet leader have until now kept the pressure cooker contained.
Governments in the West welcomed a new democracy in Egypt just as they will welcome the downfall of Ghadaffi when eventually, aided by mainly British and French forces he is overthrown.
But what do these supposed intelligent politicians expect to replace these tyrranies? Democracy?
No. The inhabitants of these countries have no culture of democracy, like all other Arab countries. They are still mired in their medieval creed and are also tribal.
However whichever tribe they belong to they are united in their adherence to islam and a visceral hatred to the perceived and largely true injustice perpetrated on the Palestinians by the Western financed Jewish state.
Israel is of course much more democratic than any Arab state(not hard) even though it is not completely democratic and treats the indigenous Palestinians as second class citizens.
The Arabs have much greater numbers and think they can wipe Israel out.
If they do they are deluding themselves.
Israel, even without American help is a sophisticated society, populated by intelligent people with many scientists and can easily hold its own.
The Egyptian army is in effect a rabble, disorganised and ill led. However large it is it has no chance of resisting Israeli might.
Why do I mention these events?
Because they do not concern us and we should for once keep our nose out. Help neither side and leave them to it.
That way we will not incur the ire of the Arab countries or their sleepers in our country.
Israel would win any war and do not need us. If they did lose that would not matter so much to us. Muslims would not flock here as a result. so myself I would not care either way.
I would take the attitude of the countries which are now overtaking us in the economic stakes China, India and Russia and ignore the whole situation.
In the aftermath of any conflict we could be friendly with the winner to our economic advantage.
These views may not seem "ethical". They are not meant to be.
My view is what is best for Britain is paramount.
Blair and Cameron have hardly been "ethical" and their policies have been responsible for hundreds of thousands of people's deaths.
My ideas would not involve loss of life and they would help to ensure the survival of OUR people and the financial viability of OUR country, which I believe is more ethical than policies perpetrated by these so called "leaders"
MORE ON ROCHDALE
More on our new Rochdale organiser and "super activist" David O'Loughlin.
He may be a super activist and a good nationalist but he has one big drawback.
The people of Rochdale have never heard of him.
There is no record of him ever having taken part in any activism in Rochdale, which probably explains his inauguration to the public in Salford.
In spite of what the management of the Party says, if they can not find a person known to Rochdale to promote nationalism it is a sad reflection on the decline in the party's influence.
There are many nationalists in Rochdale and there is scope for many more, but this "unknown" man will find it more difficult to enthuse the people of that town than a veteran local activist.
They will have to do better than this to prevent the Griffinite ship from sinking.
All is not lost however. There are many in the wings waiting to take up the challenge of saving our country when we are rid of our present incompetent and financially bankrupt party, its present leader and his sychophantic accolytes
Do not lose faith.
He may be a super activist and a good nationalist but he has one big drawback.
The people of Rochdale have never heard of him.
There is no record of him ever having taken part in any activism in Rochdale, which probably explains his inauguration to the public in Salford.
In spite of what the management of the Party says, if they can not find a person known to Rochdale to promote nationalism it is a sad reflection on the decline in the party's influence.
There are many nationalists in Rochdale and there is scope for many more, but this "unknown" man will find it more difficult to enthuse the people of that town than a veteran local activist.
They will have to do better than this to prevent the Griffinite ship from sinking.
All is not lost however. There are many in the wings waiting to take up the challenge of saving our country when we are rid of our present incompetent and financially bankrupt party, its present leader and his sychophantic accolytes
Do not lose faith.
Friday, 9 September 2011
THOUGHTS ON 9/11
As people's thoughts hark back to the terrible terrorist attack on the Twin Towers in New York ten years ago we are told there is a severe and credible threat of another terrorist attack to mark this anniversary.
This threat may be real. It may be a hoax.
Either way the terrorists will have hit us just as they do every time we go through an airport with all the extra security, costs and time wasting involved.
After 10 years we are no safer than we were on that terrible day in spite of the millions spent worldwide in counter terrorism activities.
Yes Bin Laden has been killed as have many of his cohorts but as one lot is eliminated they sprout up like weeds in ever greater quantities.
Why is this?
Well the initial reason still prevails, the USA supported and still supports the illegal occupation of Palestine by Israel.
This is because of the dominant influence of the Zionist lobby in America and its disproportunate financial clout. American presidents are afraid of bringing them to heel.
This could to a large degree be achieved by controlling the financial and other banking industries.
Regulate these parasitic industries even to the point of bankruptsy. The money in which they deal and lend out at excessive interest has to a large degree been created out of thin air and that interest is a drag on the living standards of the ordinary person.
This may seem to be a draconian solution but it could be done, and some sacrifices are necessary as in times of war to guarantee ourselves from tyranny of a military or financial kind.
Our country is controlled to a lesser extent by such people and their activities should be curbed.
Notably China and India are controlled by their own people. Perhaps that is one reason they are rapidly overtaking the West economically.
This is not to condone in any way the horror of 9/11 but that outrage and the wars that followed are as a consequence of the creation of the state of Israel and its aggressive expansionist policies.
BUT we are where we are. The question is how do we lessen the likelyhood of further outrages.
Not by bombing Afganistan, that's for sure. It only makes things worse.
WE must STOP any muslim immigration and encourage those here to return to regimes more congenial to their medieval thought processes.
We must punish any who are involved in any way with terrorism.
We must take it out on their families by expelling them, together with their friends and be prepared to protect ourselves from any disturbances this may cause by bringing the army home.
Although I am generally against the death penalty I believe that terrorists proved of murder should have suspended death sentences to be put into action immediately any further outrage occurs, and their bodies fed to pigs, as should the body parts of those killed by their own bombs.
All muslim prisoners should be kept in jails painted with pigs blood and be obliged to eat pig products or starve.
These means I believe would be a great disincentive to further atrocities with minimal loss of life, and perhaps save a few virgins having to face these ugly so called martyrs in Heaven.
I agree with Bush that we face a war on terrorism, but that war will have to be faced here because of the rapid increase of muslims allowed to set up house here.
It will not be fought in Afghanistan or Pakistan long distance with unmanned drones.
It will be fought here.
We must try to prevent it and if anything does kick off we must avoid the past stupidities of reassuring the muslim population ,and hit the miscreants hard.
and--
We must keep our army up to strength and bring them home.
We may need them sooner than the idiots ruling us think.
Or is it all in the Common Purpose NWO plan to destroy us, our people and our land?
Sometimes it looks like it!.
This threat may be real. It may be a hoax.
Either way the terrorists will have hit us just as they do every time we go through an airport with all the extra security, costs and time wasting involved.
After 10 years we are no safer than we were on that terrible day in spite of the millions spent worldwide in counter terrorism activities.
Yes Bin Laden has been killed as have many of his cohorts but as one lot is eliminated they sprout up like weeds in ever greater quantities.
Why is this?
Well the initial reason still prevails, the USA supported and still supports the illegal occupation of Palestine by Israel.
This is because of the dominant influence of the Zionist lobby in America and its disproportunate financial clout. American presidents are afraid of bringing them to heel.
This could to a large degree be achieved by controlling the financial and other banking industries.
Regulate these parasitic industries even to the point of bankruptsy. The money in which they deal and lend out at excessive interest has to a large degree been created out of thin air and that interest is a drag on the living standards of the ordinary person.
This may seem to be a draconian solution but it could be done, and some sacrifices are necessary as in times of war to guarantee ourselves from tyranny of a military or financial kind.
Our country is controlled to a lesser extent by such people and their activities should be curbed.
Notably China and India are controlled by their own people. Perhaps that is one reason they are rapidly overtaking the West economically.
This is not to condone in any way the horror of 9/11 but that outrage and the wars that followed are as a consequence of the creation of the state of Israel and its aggressive expansionist policies.
BUT we are where we are. The question is how do we lessen the likelyhood of further outrages.
Not by bombing Afganistan, that's for sure. It only makes things worse.
WE must STOP any muslim immigration and encourage those here to return to regimes more congenial to their medieval thought processes.
We must punish any who are involved in any way with terrorism.
We must take it out on their families by expelling them, together with their friends and be prepared to protect ourselves from any disturbances this may cause by bringing the army home.
Although I am generally against the death penalty I believe that terrorists proved of murder should have suspended death sentences to be put into action immediately any further outrage occurs, and their bodies fed to pigs, as should the body parts of those killed by their own bombs.
All muslim prisoners should be kept in jails painted with pigs blood and be obliged to eat pig products or starve.
These means I believe would be a great disincentive to further atrocities with minimal loss of life, and perhaps save a few virgins having to face these ugly so called martyrs in Heaven.
I agree with Bush that we face a war on terrorism, but that war will have to be faced here because of the rapid increase of muslims allowed to set up house here.
It will not be fought in Afghanistan or Pakistan long distance with unmanned drones.
It will be fought here.
We must try to prevent it and if anything does kick off we must avoid the past stupidities of reassuring the muslim population ,and hit the miscreants hard.
and--
We must keep our army up to strength and bring them home.
We may need them sooner than the idiots ruling us think.
Or is it all in the Common Purpose NWO plan to destroy us, our people and our land?
Sometimes it looks like it!.
Wednesday, 7 September 2011
UAF SEE THE EDL AS UNTER MENSCHEN
UAF are acting just like the NAZIS and FASCISTS as the NAZIS and FASCISTS decried the Jews as UNTER MENSHEN (Subhuman)the UAF are now doing the same to people who have a different view.
Listen to last video and you will hear the UAF bragging about an attack on a lone female EDL support.
The UAF are the new NAZIS and FASCIST who support attacks on lone female UNTER MENSCHEN.
Tuesday, 6 September 2011
“I will kill you English, I will kill all you English.”
AN ILLEGAL immigrant will be deported after racially assaulting a police officer and claiming over £3,000 in benefits he was not entitled too.
At a trial at Wigan Magistrates Court, Sangar Salim-Ahmed, of Manor Street, Newtown, pleaded guilty to making a false statement to obtain benefits and racially aggravated common assault.
For the full story please click on the text below:
Whilst being arrested he twice spat in the face of the arresting police officer and shouted racial abuse, including: “I will kill you English, I will kill all you English.”
At a trial at Wigan Magistrates Court, Sangar Salim-Ahmed, of Manor Street, Newtown, pleaded guilty to making a false statement to obtain benefits and racially aggravated common assault.
For the full story please click on the text below:
Whilst being arrested he twice spat in the face of the arresting police officer and shouted racial abuse, including: “I will kill you English, I will kill all you English.”
Monday, 5 September 2011
MORE NEWS ON ROCHDALE
More on the newly appointed long standing activist who was appointed as Rochdale organiser amid much publicity in Salford last week.
It seems many in Rochdale have never heard of him.
Also I have heard that the Oldham organiser has been sacked (yes another).
I know people on the photo taken at that momentous meeting are also disillusioned with the way the party is going.
How do I get all this information? People ring me to tell me of their discontent.
Mike Whitby is going to have to take his small band round to many more towns for a photo opportunity if he is to be able to halt the downward spiral.
Note how the same people always seem to be on the photos.
Not much sign of a growing enthusiasm.
I believe we have a new organiser in Wigan & Leigh.
I wish him every success and I will certainly attend his meetings when he calls them.
He does not realise the thankless task he has at present but I wish him well.
We must keep a local spark glowing ready when the time comes to burst into flame as a credible force to save our country.
For now I await the results of developments which are taking place behind the scenes and I urge patriots not to give up.
OUR TIME WILL COME AND SOON.
It seems many in Rochdale have never heard of him.
Also I have heard that the Oldham organiser has been sacked (yes another).
I know people on the photo taken at that momentous meeting are also disillusioned with the way the party is going.
How do I get all this information? People ring me to tell me of their discontent.
Mike Whitby is going to have to take his small band round to many more towns for a photo opportunity if he is to be able to halt the downward spiral.
Note how the same people always seem to be on the photos.
Not much sign of a growing enthusiasm.
I believe we have a new organiser in Wigan & Leigh.
I wish him every success and I will certainly attend his meetings when he calls them.
He does not realise the thankless task he has at present but I wish him well.
We must keep a local spark glowing ready when the time comes to burst into flame as a credible force to save our country.
For now I await the results of developments which are taking place behind the scenes and I urge patriots not to give up.
OUR TIME WILL COME AND SOON.
Friday, 2 September 2011
WHY NOT IN ROCHDALE?
Good news today on the BNP website. The Rochdale branch is to be reformed.
At a meeting in Salford the new organiser was introduced and photographed with his Salford supporters.
The question which must be asked is why does Rochdale need a new dawn?
It was a good successful branch two years ago but by accident or design was allowed to wither on the vine.
Another question. Why was the inaugural meeting in Salford? Was there no venue or not enough people in Rochdale to fill a small pub room to make this momentous announcement?
I have spoken at well attended and enthusiastic meetings in that town. They had a candidate in the last General Election and local council candidates.
What went wrong?
What went wrong in many other towns in the North West when local branches and groups are moribund or dead?
Our Wigan and Leigh group has in effect ceased to exist and our organiser sacked following an altercation with Clive Jefferson at our last meeting (to which Clive and the Walker brothers were not invited).
Mike Whitby says he will appoint a new organiser. I hope he can and we can reinstate our group. But who will do the job in the present climate?
There is a dearth of activity in the North West, groups and branches have ceased to exist.
It is claimed by the leadership that it is the fault of local activists, but they should ask why?
Why has the motivation to save our country been stifled?
I would suggest it is the fault of the party management. All enthusiasm has been squashed.
This at a time when all the political indices are in our nationalist favour.
Ethnic riots, record numbers of immigrants, foreign wars, cuts in services, higher unemployment and prospects for our British people, and the prospect of building millions of houses in our overcrowded land to accomodate these aliens.
We should have been making great strides in this environment.
It's no use blaming all the local branch organisers all over the country. They have all lost their enthusiasm. They believe the same things and can not be all wrong.
When things go wrong in battle , industry or politics the buck must stop at the top.
Our party, once full of enthusiam has lost its motivation with membership plummeting whatever they claim.
Ordinary members are dissatisfied with the financial statements (or lack of them) put out by the party hierarchy. It's our money. We want to know where it has gone.
We want a logical programme of the direction we must take.
We want a party unsullied by scandal of which we can be proud.
Then we will regain our enthusiasm and again promote our patriotic ideas, but if we are continually held back by sleaze and incompetence we lose our motivation.
It is said that today our leader has had his Skoda car (a funny vehicle for a supposed nationalist who supports British workers) repossessed for debts owing.
I do not know the details but it leaves a nasty taste and gives the impression of a leader who is not quite honest in the eyes of the voting public.
If true you can be sure that the media will make capital out of that.
Yes I know the other party leaders have wealthy backers, but we supposedly had two million pounds over the last two years so there is no excuse.
Perhaps if we could have a bit more honesty from the leadership we could be motivated, but then that could reveal matters they would rather keep from us.
So for now the thankless task of Mike Whitby in the NW ,trying to revive the moribund but once thriving branches with his small and decreasing group of cohorts smiling in photos in every town to indicate an enthusiasm which is not there will continue.
Maybe soon he will realise his is a lost cause, and maybe the leadership will realise their many cock ups and missed opportunities and reform to a re invigorated party.
I am not hopeful and am beginning to feel that this once great party should be put out of its misery to make room for a new clean nationalist grouping which has the possibility of success.
It saddens me to say this but facts are facts.
It's a pity the leadership and those still believing in them can not see it but our party is heading to oblivion.
This does not mean the end of nationalism or patriotism. These principles are needed more than ever and will come to the fore as the-- BRITISH PEOPLE RISE AGAIN.
At a meeting in Salford the new organiser was introduced and photographed with his Salford supporters.
The question which must be asked is why does Rochdale need a new dawn?
It was a good successful branch two years ago but by accident or design was allowed to wither on the vine.
Another question. Why was the inaugural meeting in Salford? Was there no venue or not enough people in Rochdale to fill a small pub room to make this momentous announcement?
I have spoken at well attended and enthusiastic meetings in that town. They had a candidate in the last General Election and local council candidates.
What went wrong?
What went wrong in many other towns in the North West when local branches and groups are moribund or dead?
Our Wigan and Leigh group has in effect ceased to exist and our organiser sacked following an altercation with Clive Jefferson at our last meeting (to which Clive and the Walker brothers were not invited).
Mike Whitby says he will appoint a new organiser. I hope he can and we can reinstate our group. But who will do the job in the present climate?
There is a dearth of activity in the North West, groups and branches have ceased to exist.
It is claimed by the leadership that it is the fault of local activists, but they should ask why?
Why has the motivation to save our country been stifled?
I would suggest it is the fault of the party management. All enthusiasm has been squashed.
This at a time when all the political indices are in our nationalist favour.
Ethnic riots, record numbers of immigrants, foreign wars, cuts in services, higher unemployment and prospects for our British people, and the prospect of building millions of houses in our overcrowded land to accomodate these aliens.
We should have been making great strides in this environment.
It's no use blaming all the local branch organisers all over the country. They have all lost their enthusiasm. They believe the same things and can not be all wrong.
When things go wrong in battle , industry or politics the buck must stop at the top.
Our party, once full of enthusiam has lost its motivation with membership plummeting whatever they claim.
Ordinary members are dissatisfied with the financial statements (or lack of them) put out by the party hierarchy. It's our money. We want to know where it has gone.
We want a logical programme of the direction we must take.
We want a party unsullied by scandal of which we can be proud.
Then we will regain our enthusiasm and again promote our patriotic ideas, but if we are continually held back by sleaze and incompetence we lose our motivation.
It is said that today our leader has had his Skoda car (a funny vehicle for a supposed nationalist who supports British workers) repossessed for debts owing.
I do not know the details but it leaves a nasty taste and gives the impression of a leader who is not quite honest in the eyes of the voting public.
If true you can be sure that the media will make capital out of that.
Yes I know the other party leaders have wealthy backers, but we supposedly had two million pounds over the last two years so there is no excuse.
Perhaps if we could have a bit more honesty from the leadership we could be motivated, but then that could reveal matters they would rather keep from us.
So for now the thankless task of Mike Whitby in the NW ,trying to revive the moribund but once thriving branches with his small and decreasing group of cohorts smiling in photos in every town to indicate an enthusiasm which is not there will continue.
Maybe soon he will realise his is a lost cause, and maybe the leadership will realise their many cock ups and missed opportunities and reform to a re invigorated party.
I am not hopeful and am beginning to feel that this once great party should be put out of its misery to make room for a new clean nationalist grouping which has the possibility of success.
It saddens me to say this but facts are facts.
It's a pity the leadership and those still believing in them can not see it but our party is heading to oblivion.
This does not mean the end of nationalism or patriotism. These principles are needed more than ever and will come to the fore as the-- BRITISH PEOPLE RISE AGAIN.
Thursday, 1 September 2011
How the POLICE react when the ENGLISH want to defend their communities from the rioters and looters and how they react to IMMIGRANTS defending their c
As we know there have been serious cases of "SHOPPING WITH VIOLENCE" in parts of the ENGLAND a few weeks ago.
The POLICE were knowhere in sight when the VIOLENCE flaired, with POLICE vehicles abondoned in public places filmed being attacked with not a "POLICE OFFICER" (I use the term loosly, as they are now just STATE controlled STASI)in sight.
Later into the violent riots the POLICE were sent on the street in such small numbers against 100s of rioters. Yet all they did were stand by and watch.
Things turned out to be different when the ENGLISH went out on to their streets, not to riot or cause violence and mayhem but to protect their communities and properties from those that would cause harm.
And what was the reaction to that by the STASI ?
"Hundreds of police officers descended on a London suburb last night to disperse about 60 men who claimed to be protecting shops and businesses there for a second night.
The men, apparently supporters of the extreme-right English Defence League, gathered in a pedestrianised square in Eltham drinking cans of beer and chanting 'We love you England'.
With shops and pubs in the high street shut, the group – white men aged in their 20s to 50s – brought carrier bags with beer in them and drank and sat on benches.
But around 300 police officers flooded the high street, surrounding the group. Around 8.30pm, the order was given to disperse the group of EDL supporters – and youths who had arrived to see what was going on.
Officers moved in to shepherd the group away from the square, known as Passey Place, and out of the town down Eltham Hill."
Things were rather different for other, non Indigenous English groups, who were seen on the streets armed with "HOCKEY STICKS and METAL BARS", With apparent POLICE knowledge.
"Some groups had armed themselves with lengths of pipe and baseball bats, while some shopkeepers had knives in their stores, claiming that police were 'nowhere to be seen' and had 'failed' them during the first three days of violence.
It wouldn't be a case of STATE SPONSORED OPPRESSION could it ?
The POLICE were knowhere in sight when the VIOLENCE flaired, with POLICE vehicles abondoned in public places filmed being attacked with not a "POLICE OFFICER" (I use the term loosly, as they are now just STATE controlled STASI)in sight.
Later into the violent riots the POLICE were sent on the street in such small numbers against 100s of rioters. Yet all they did were stand by and watch.
Things turned out to be different when the ENGLISH went out on to their streets, not to riot or cause violence and mayhem but to protect their communities and properties from those that would cause harm.
And what was the reaction to that by the STASI ?
"Hundreds of police officers descended on a London suburb last night to disperse about 60 men who claimed to be protecting shops and businesses there for a second night.
The men, apparently supporters of the extreme-right English Defence League, gathered in a pedestrianised square in Eltham drinking cans of beer and chanting 'We love you England'.
With shops and pubs in the high street shut, the group – white men aged in their 20s to 50s – brought carrier bags with beer in them and drank and sat on benches.
But around 300 police officers flooded the high street, surrounding the group. Around 8.30pm, the order was given to disperse the group of EDL supporters – and youths who had arrived to see what was going on.
Officers moved in to shepherd the group away from the square, known as Passey Place, and out of the town down Eltham Hill."
Things were rather different for other, non Indigenous English groups, who were seen on the streets armed with "HOCKEY STICKS and METAL BARS", With apparent POLICE knowledge.
"Some groups had armed themselves with lengths of pipe and baseball bats, while some shopkeepers had knives in their stores, claiming that police were 'nowhere to be seen' and had 'failed' them during the first three days of violence.
Sikh men armed with hockey sticks and metal bars were on guard yesterday in both West London and West Bromwich and stressed they were there with the 'full knowledge' of police."
Now I wonder why the STASI were so quick in sending in over 300 officers in an area being protected by the INDIGENOUS population yet were willing to allow IMMIGRANTS, of whatever persuaion, to ARM THEMSELVES to protect their communities with apparent FULL POLICE KNOWLEDGE and apparent tacit agreement ?It wouldn't be a case of STATE SPONSORED OPPRESSION could it ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)