I have several regular internet correspondents. One of them had recently read this and so decided to carry out a little test. The correspondence between me and him, and him and Trevor Phillips' crew (EHRC) went like this:
**name** : "I SENT THIS":
"Dear Sir
Would you kindly let me know what the precise membership criteria are for the above?
Thank you kindly for your time."
[referring to the Dumfries and Galloway crowd in the linked BNP article]
"THEY [EHRC}REPLY WITH THIS":
"Dear Sir,
Thank you for bringing this organisation to our attention. It is an organisation we are aware of and a preliminary assessment of the issues you have raised are being carried out to enable the Commission to assess whether, and if so what, enforcement action is appropriate in this case. The EHRC values all the information it receives from members of the public and others about possible breaches of equality and human rights legislation.
Because of the need to maintain confidentiality during any initial assessments it is not possible to provide you with individual feedback on this matter. The Commission will however publish details of any enforcement action taken where it is legally possible and appropriate to do so.
RMConlon" [might be a typo there - it could be Condon]
"says f**k all"
I suggest he should write to them again, tell them he's from Trinidad, and ask what the membership criteria are for the British National Party. Bet he gets a more informative reply than the above nonsense. In fact - any of you could do that ...
Let me know what they say.
I detect the stench of an almighty double standard.
Morg
.
A LOCAL BLOG SUPPORTING THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE AND ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN AND LEIGH IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST FASCISM, THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT AND FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT. - "NO FOREIGN PRINCE, PERSON, PRELATE, STATE OR POTENTATE HATH, OR OUGHT TO HAVE, ANY JURISDICTION, POWER, SUPERIORITY, PRE-EMINENCE, OR AUTHORITY, ECCLESIASTICAL OR SPIRITUAL, WITHIN THIS REALM" (ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689)
Thursday, 24 September 2009
SURVEILLANCE
Picked up this little warning while wandering around – very well put. We should all at least note the warning itself. The original can be found here if you scroll down to the very bottom.
This is from a Swedish website. It’s written by a Swede who doesn’t have English as his first language, so spelling and grammatical errors are to be expected. He certainly speaks/writes English better than I speak Swedish (stereotype alert// which Danes say is incoherent anyway).
Actually, the blog and comments – quite long – have some interesting things to say in their own right, though I very much doubt he’s a Swedish Nationalist.
Then again, we’re British; so what can anyone tell us about being under surveillance all the time?
Survaillance
WARNING!*
E-mail, phones and ALL Internet Communications to and from *this is not only relevant for
How do we tell if our internet traffic is/isn’t being routed through Swedish servers?
Morg
P.S. I thought
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)