Declaration Of Right
This is a brief outline of our inalienable RIGHTS.
Definition:
Inalienable -
Adjective:
Unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor: "inalienable human rights of the citizen"Declaration Of Right
"The Petition of Right at the beginning of the 17th century, and the
Declaration of Right and Bill of Rights at the end, embody a century
long fight to constrain the power of Government. At that time it was the
Monarch who desired a divine right. Today it is our Parlimentarians.
The Petition of Right and Declaration of Right are Common Law contracts
between the People and the Crown. The Bill of Rights is a statue law
enactment of the Declaration of Right.
The Declaration of Right was imposed upon William and Mary as a
condition of their assuming the Crown - in other words, they would only
be elected by the People if they accepted its terms.
The Declaration of Right, and the Bill of Rights, clearly state that -
no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have, any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm.
So it can clearly be seen that every EU treaty imposed upon us by
Parliament, is unconstitutional. Here is the evidence that our present
Monarch has indeed broken her Coronation Oath, by giving Royal Assent to
these treaties.
Other constitutional rights given by these contracts -
- The right to bear arms
- The right to petition the Sovereign
- Free men cannot be imprisoned without cause
- The Government cannot arrest any man because he disagrees with the Government’s policies
- Habeas corpus is not to be denied
- No person will be compelled to make loans to the King, and there will be no tax without the approval of Parliament
- Soldiers and sailors will not be billeted on civilians
- Government will not impose martial law during peacetime
The right to bear arms gives every person the right to self defence
using reasonable force, including deadly force if appropriate. Using
tragic events as an excuse to remove that right has historically been
the work of governments with good reason to fear their people -
governments intent on some kind of future totalitarian control of their
populations."
With thanks to -
The BCG don't make any mention of the FOREIGNERS or offspring of FOREIGNERS who are now sitting in positions of jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or
authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm.
Don't you think that's a point we should be making vehemently and explaining how this DENYS US OUR RIGHTS ?
I do think that there is more to RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS than for self defence.
Surely it was also used to keep the PTB on their toes and to ward off Totalitarian and Despotic Regimes as well as for the rapid mobilisation of the Population, used to carrying and using Arms, against INVASION.
I don't think an unarmed and untrained in Arms "Olivers Army" would have fared well against the well Armed and trained Royalists in the ENGLISH CIVIL WAR.
"THEY" cannot stop us BEARING ARMS ENGLISHMEN SHOULD ASSERT THEIR RIGHTS, as laid down in the ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS (1689)and the PTB come for them, then they will be facing Armed ENGLISHMEN who would then be within their RIGHTS to FIGHT A NEW CIVIL WAR AGAINST THE TRAITORS AND THOSE WHO WOULD DESTROY US.
THEY ARE OUR RIGHTS - "THEY" CANNOT TAKE THEM AWAY AND NO LAW CAN SUPERCEDE RIGHTS, EVEN THOUGH THEY WILL TRY TO TELL YOU DIFFERENT.
RIGHTS OVERRULE LAWS.
ENGLISHMEN SHOULD STAND UP, BECOME THE FEARLESS AND FEARED ENGLISHMAN AGAIN AND BE COUNTED, AND FIGHT FOR OUR/YOUR RIGHTS AS AN ENGLISHMAN.
AS WE HAVE NOTHING TO FIGHTBACK WITH AT PRESENT
THE LIB/LAB/CONned ARE PISSING ON OUR GRANDFATHERS GRAVES, OUR WAR DEAD GRAVES, OUR ANCESTORS GRAVES.
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?
Taken from Wikipedia -
The meaning of RIGHTS
Rights are often considered fundamental to civilization, being regarded as established pillars of society and culture,[2] and the history of social conflicts can be found in the history of each right and its development. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "rights structure the form of governments, the content of laws, and the shape of morality as it is currently perceived."[1] The connection between rights and struggle cannot be overstated — rights are not as much granted or endowed as they are fought for and claimed, and the essence of struggles past and ancient are encoded in the spirit of current concepts of rights and their modern formulations.
