A FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY????

As noted by my erstwhile co-editor, the EU has taken on extra 18 MEPs for £7 million. Bruno Waterfield is telling us that this has been achieved by amending "its controversial Lisbon Treaty".

This was done by permanent representatives, known as "EU ambassadors" who met behind closed doors yesterday to sign off the amendment. The amendment must now be ratified in all the Union's 27 countries and will require primary legislation in the UK - "potentially opening up dissent among Conservative MPs who campaigned for a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty."

Actually, though, it isn't an amendment to the Lisbon Treaty. According to the EU Council, it is a "protocol amending the protocol on transitional provisions annexed to the treaty on European Union, to the treaty on the functioning of the European Union and to the treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community."

Now, if you can actually work out what that is saying, we are talking about an addendum amending an addendum which sets out changes to transitional provisions. It doesn't even change a treaty. It simply changes the speed at which a previously agreed change to the treaty comes into force.

Although some activists are hyperventilating about this, a Cleggeron spokesman has said: "This is not a new transfer of power from Westminster to the EU and therefore it doesn't meet the criteria for holding a referendum."

He or she (or it? ... one has to be inclusive these days) has got it dead right. We are not going to the barricades over a protocol amending a protocol.

http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2010/06/to-barricades.html

Morg
.

WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!

On Monday I attended a well supported meeting in St Helens to hear a talk by Arthur Kemp who detailed the way forward for our party.
The talk began with a question and answer session about the alleged trouble in the party.
Arthur answered all questions re the finances of the party, a possible leadership challenge and many of the spurious innuendoes of teminal strife which originated in the serpent like rantings of the pro Searchlight blogs.
We were all pleased to hear of the party's progress both financially and organisationally and the plans in place to further our cause, which of course I will not detail here in order that we wrong foot our State sponsored opponents on the Left.

Yes there is some disagreement over details (I do not always agree with my wife) but the meeting reassured all that on all sides our aim is the same and that is the progress of our Party in the preservation of our land people and culture.

Thus our aims are the same on all sides and the only disagreements are on the tactics to achieve that aim, a natural situation in a democratic party.

So Searchlight UAF et al. Dont hold your breath. There has never been or will be a split.

THE BNP WILL NOT BE MOVED.

MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS

I see black left wing Labour leadership candidate Diane Abbott has justified sending her son to a private school on the grounjds that "black mothers are very interested in their childs welfare" or some such words. This implies of course that white mothers don't care about their kids, a rather racist remark I think. (come to think of it where is Mr Abbott?, does not this denote a racial characeristic?)
Now I as a BNP membher would be considered by Abbott and her ilk as right wing (I,m not) on account of my belief in and love for my own country and its people. I also do not believe in private education but can understand parents, driven to despair by the ruined education system imposed on our children by the egalitarian Labour governement whose beliefs are those of levelling down rather than rewarding achievement. They of course can afford to by pass this iniquitous system.


My grandchildren are trapped in it and their education is years behind mine at my old primary church school.
The subjects taught in secondary school are "soft" such as drama, cookery and dance while "hard subjects such as maths and science are neglected, and that's the boys.
No wonder there are so many unemployed youngsters. They have no qualifications relevant to the world of work.
Also there is no discipline in the schools and special attention is given to the disruptive pupils while those wishing to learn are discouraged.
How can we ever compete with China and India with this shambles?
On paper the results look good, this being as a result of making exams easier.

A difficulty is that many teachers have been educated under this regime and also know little. I have heard of maths and other subjects being taught by teachers, often supply teachers who haave no knowledge of the subjects. The good dedicated teachers are becoming increasingly rare as they throw the towel in in despair.
It is impossible to sack incompetent teachers owing to the PC marxist NUT. They only support sacking of good teachers following spurious claims of "assault" by troublesome pupils, and so the decline in standards continues.

The Government solution? Tear down the old school and build a new one (financed by PFI which benefits their parasitical friends in the City). Fill the new school with the same unruly pupils and incompetent teachers and call it "an academy" with the word excellence tagged on to disguise the deceit.

It would be nice if we could all take the left wing egalitarian approach and have decent schools for our children and grandchildren, but then we whites can not play the "race card" as an excuse for our hypocricy, in spite of the fact that we care as much for our children as black single parents.

Some people and their children really are "MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS"