Saturday, 9 July 2011
THIS IS WHERE OUR "SECURITY EXPERTS" WERE WIPED OUT AND TREASON TO BEGIN
The pilots were accused of gross negligence after 29 people died on the flight from Belfast to Inverness when it crashed on the Mull of Kintyre 17 years ago.
Campaigners fought for nearly two decades for Flt Lt Jonathan Tapper and Flt Lt Richard Cook to be cleared of blame.
Liam Fox, the defence secretary, ordered a review into the cause of the 1994 crash in September last year,
The independent report, chaired by Lord Philip, a retired judge, is understood to say that the pilots should not have been accused of gross negligence.
The Chinook, carrying 25 of Britain’s most senior intelligence experts and four special forces crew, crashed in thick fog on 2 June 1994, in what was the RAF’s worst peacetime accident.
Two RAF Air Marshals concluded that the pilots were guilty of gross negligence but their findings have been disputed by campaigners ever since.
Despite the long campaign by the pilots’ supporters, successive defence secretaries have refused to overturn the Marshals’ conclusions.
But now, after a nine-month inquiry, Lord Philip’s recommendations have been submitted to Mr Fox, who is due to make a statement to MPs on the findings next week.
Campaigners hope that the defence secretary will posthumously clear the pilots of blame.
In April this year, newly discovered Ministry of Defence documents cast doubt on the original explanation for the Chinook crash, suggesting that official concerns had been expressed over the airworthiness of the RAF’s fleet of Chinooks two years earlier.
It is understood the documents were never shown to the officer in charge of signing off the aircraft’s airworthiness.
------------------------------------
The above crash killed the most senior security experts that Britain had.
With the death of these men and the knowledge that they took with them to the grave allowed the treasonus destruction of Britain and the creation of the EU to begin.
The Heads of Britains Security Services were never allowed to travel together to protect them from such disasters, yet they were ALL allowed to travel together in this Chinook. Something that they would never normally do. So why did they ?
When you ask yourself how we have gotten ourselves into this position with a foreign enemy invited to live amongst us, the 25 men mentioned above would never have allowed this to happen.
When they went to their deaths it was hoped that we, as a nation and a people would follow suit. Tony Bliar and his TREASONUS CRONIES would never have been allowed to come to power under the guidance and direction of our Security Services led by the men who were more than probably murdered in the Mull of Kintyre air crash.
SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
Enough for a while of this navel gazing!
There will be few nationalists who do not feel a little schadenfreude at the closure of the News of The World.
The owner, ruthless global capitalist Murdoch is finally getting a few of his just desserts. His paper's underhand and criminal tactics to sensationalise and libel innocent people who can not afford legal redress have been long notorious.
Our party has often been libelled by his publications, mainly I believe on account of our opposition to his capitalist creed which puts the interests of the wealthy above the people of our country.
Of course he has no allegience to Britain. He is an Aussie living in the USA and his media empire with its near stranglehold on news represents a danger to democracy.
He has far too much power and political influence for one who has not been elected, and the courting of him and subaservience to him by our political leaders shows their contempt for us and their cowardice.
As has been said before "absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Fortunately he has been shown that he does not have absolute power and it is to be hoped that he is to be cut down to size.
Not that the other press barons are much better. The press is controlled by less than a dozen powerful men, all biased against the British people and our party.
The internet is giving us an opportunity to counter this democratic deficit but the press still remains powerful.
That's why the demise or rebranding of VoF is such a disappointment. Formerly it was printed on newsprint and was informative and well edited and people asked for it.
The new version looks like a leaflet which in effect it is with little to stimulate the reader.
The reason for this change was said to be to improve it, but I have been told it was because we had not paid for the printing of previous editions.
Whatever the reason there is little demand for it, and we still in spite of the internet need a newspaper vehicle to promote our policies.
Who decided to change the format and the reason I can only have an educated guess, another reason for openness in our party.
Be that as it may, PLEASE BRING BACK VOF
There will be few nationalists who do not feel a little schadenfreude at the closure of the News of The World.
The owner, ruthless global capitalist Murdoch is finally getting a few of his just desserts. His paper's underhand and criminal tactics to sensationalise and libel innocent people who can not afford legal redress have been long notorious.
Our party has often been libelled by his publications, mainly I believe on account of our opposition to his capitalist creed which puts the interests of the wealthy above the people of our country.
Of course he has no allegience to Britain. He is an Aussie living in the USA and his media empire with its near stranglehold on news represents a danger to democracy.
He has far too much power and political influence for one who has not been elected, and the courting of him and subaservience to him by our political leaders shows their contempt for us and their cowardice.
As has been said before "absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Fortunately he has been shown that he does not have absolute power and it is to be hoped that he is to be cut down to size.
Not that the other press barons are much better. The press is controlled by less than a dozen powerful men, all biased against the British people and our party.
The internet is giving us an opportunity to counter this democratic deficit but the press still remains powerful.
That's why the demise or rebranding of VoF is such a disappointment. Formerly it was printed on newsprint and was informative and well edited and people asked for it.
The new version looks like a leaflet which in effect it is with little to stimulate the reader.
The reason for this change was said to be to improve it, but I have been told it was because we had not paid for the printing of previous editions.
Whatever the reason there is little demand for it, and we still in spite of the internet need a newspaper vehicle to promote our policies.
Who decided to change the format and the reason I can only have an educated guess, another reason for openness in our party.
Be that as it may, PLEASE BRING BACK VOF
HOT UNDER THE COLLAR
We received our booklet from supporters of Andrew Brons this morning.
It is dynamite and exposes in a clear and concise form some of the shady practices and corruption employed by the leadership of the party.
It charts in detail the decline in our party fortunes over the last two years with the numbers of council seats lost and our proportion of the vote going down.
Any leader who was interested in the future of our party and country would have done the decent thing and resigned as he promised.
Yes Nick Griffin has done great things in the past but it is time for him to go before he does more damage.
The booklet has got them rattled and contain the allegations of "lies".I have had a text and e mail asking me to complain about the leaflet.
If so let the party sue, after all Griffin seems to spend much of his time in court at great cost to the membership.
Let him prove the so called lies, an accusation he frequently uses without any proof.
It is alleged that the leaflet has been put out by Butler.That is not true.
Although I have had no part in it I know who has put it out . It was put out by Party members and thus not third parties as alleged.It was not put out by Andrew Brons nor I believe with his knowledge.
It was put out in an attempt to clear away the deceit and chicanery of the present leadership and tell the truth openly, and hopefully save our party from its downward spiral.
It is said to be illegal.
No it is not. It is only illegal according to the rules made up by Griffin to consolidate his advantage.
Some will have to wait until Monday as the letter was sent second class.
I was unable to attend the hustings last night but have been told that Brons was accused of wishing to bring Sadie Graham back in.
Completely untrue.
Also Clive Jefferson kept butting in with accusations that Brons owed the party money including £500 for the use of a table at the annual conference which he did not ask for.
I was at the conference and the question must be asked why the use of a table whether oredered or not justifies the cost of £500.
The same accusation was made in Liverpool I believe.
It is evident that Andrew is the man of integrity and refuses to divert EU funds illegally, a misdemeanour for which the party is now being charged by the EU.
I suppose by putting my views on this blog I will be considered a third party.
No I am not.
I am a long standing member and refuse to be denied my say, and I say that if (when) Griffin wins the party will rapidly decline into obscurity.
The sad thing is that it was all so unnecessary.
A democratic party devoid of expulsions for asking questions and openness over financial matters could have prevented all this.
All we get are allegations of lieing.
To sort it out once and for all--PUBLISH THE ACCOUNTS AND MEMBERSHIP NUMBERS and refute the allegations.
It is dynamite and exposes in a clear and concise form some of the shady practices and corruption employed by the leadership of the party.
It charts in detail the decline in our party fortunes over the last two years with the numbers of council seats lost and our proportion of the vote going down.
Any leader who was interested in the future of our party and country would have done the decent thing and resigned as he promised.
Yes Nick Griffin has done great things in the past but it is time for him to go before he does more damage.
The booklet has got them rattled and contain the allegations of "lies".I have had a text and e mail asking me to complain about the leaflet.
If so let the party sue, after all Griffin seems to spend much of his time in court at great cost to the membership.
Let him prove the so called lies, an accusation he frequently uses without any proof.
It is alleged that the leaflet has been put out by Butler.That is not true.
Although I have had no part in it I know who has put it out . It was put out by Party members and thus not third parties as alleged.It was not put out by Andrew Brons nor I believe with his knowledge.
It was put out in an attempt to clear away the deceit and chicanery of the present leadership and tell the truth openly, and hopefully save our party from its downward spiral.
It is said to be illegal.
No it is not. It is only illegal according to the rules made up by Griffin to consolidate his advantage.
Some will have to wait until Monday as the letter was sent second class.
I was unable to attend the hustings last night but have been told that Brons was accused of wishing to bring Sadie Graham back in.
Completely untrue.
Also Clive Jefferson kept butting in with accusations that Brons owed the party money including £500 for the use of a table at the annual conference which he did not ask for.
I was at the conference and the question must be asked why the use of a table whether oredered or not justifies the cost of £500.
The same accusation was made in Liverpool I believe.
It is evident that Andrew is the man of integrity and refuses to divert EU funds illegally, a misdemeanour for which the party is now being charged by the EU.
I suppose by putting my views on this blog I will be considered a third party.
No I am not.
I am a long standing member and refuse to be denied my say, and I say that if (when) Griffin wins the party will rapidly decline into obscurity.
The sad thing is that it was all so unnecessary.
A democratic party devoid of expulsions for asking questions and openness over financial matters could have prevented all this.
All we get are allegations of lieing.
To sort it out once and for all--PUBLISH THE ACCOUNTS AND MEMBERSHIP NUMBERS and refute the allegations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)