A SQUALID FUTURE?

Tonight I watched a programme on Channel Four about the conditions in South Africa "post democracy" presented by that good British man Krishnan Gurumurthy, or something like that.

I can well understand why he was sent to report on conditions as a white man would have been in fear of his life in the shanty towns he visited.

The appalling squalour of the shanty towns he visited with rubbish, open sewers everywhere was a demonstration of typical African life.

One may wonder with what these people would have made their rudimentary shelters of if corrugated iron had not been invented by a British man in the 1820s. Perhaps they would have lived in true native ethnic style in mud huts.
Given the channel it was on, and the presenter with sympathy to the people suffering, the level of corruption and danger to the inhabitants from violent burglary was horrendous.

One woman was even afraid to go to the toilet at night (although I would think a visit in the day would have been wished to be avoided).
Possibly too many Africans about, that was the danger. I'm sure the whites would not have dared to set foot in those slums.
There was blatant corruption in the allocation of houses and profiteering by political heavyweights formerly of the "democratic ANC"

There was also a noticeable absence of men and those who were still there seemed to have done little to improve their neighbourhood.

Squalid though it was townships such as this are ubiquitous all over Africa and are shown in adverts requesting donations for help.
Cameron pledges millions of our money (not his and he has plenty) to help these people.

A question.
Could all this squalour and poverty in a wealthy country blessed by gold diamonds and coal and good land not be in some little way be the fault of their inhabitants?

Could the poverty and squalour in ALL other African countries also richly endowed with natural resources, be in a small way the fault of the inhabitants? After all many of our financial woes are blamed on the native British people.

Yes these people are poor. So were our people 100 years ago and our housing poor (I notice the slum dwellers all had mobile phones) but our streets were not covered in rubbish and we had a semblence of order and progress.

We had local councils who organised the improvement of our communities.
Our bureaucracies, although not perfect were not riven by corruption and our forefathers built a better land for their descendants.

Now areas of our large cities are receeding into crime and antisocial behaviour where knife and gun crime are on the increase. Native British people have left these areas in the process known as "white flight"
These areas in the main are populated by people of African descent who have moved here for various legitimate or other reasons. They are "celebrated" by the proponents of "diversity" as bringing a"vibrancy" to our land.

Of course the origins and ethnic make up of these new colonisers of our cities have nothing to do with increased crime levels

OR HAVE THEY? Is it in the genes?
A cursory look at the worldwide statistics would suggest so.

IS THIS THE FUTURE WHICH BECKONS OUR DESCENDANTS?

A THREE ONE WIN FOR NICK

Nick, your obsession with the forthcoming Panorama is beginning to seem pathological.
Why not let it drop and see what they say?

Your letter to the BBC on today website was a very good letter and the best response so far to whatever accusations you think they may make.

You still concentrate on financial issues and other employment matters of which most people neither know nor care about.

BUT you did land some good knockout punches at the BBC regarding their bias and general promotion of alien inhabitants of our country while excluding the views of our party who represent the indiginous inhabitants.

Why did you not do this before?
Why did you react as if you were on the ropes?

We know the BBC are lefty multiculturalists. Everybody does.

They have the power and almost a monopoly. We will never compete with them by running away. If we do that they will portray us in an even worse light and we can do little about it.
We could have used them to our advantage, but can not do that if we don't talk to them.

It is time we stopped running away and proclaimed our beliefs with pride. That way we will gain the support we are now losing.

There is a hunger in the British people for a competent movement to represent them, and we are not now providing that vehicle.

"Operation Fightback"? At present it seems like operation running away.

Stand firm Nick. Answer the questions honestly and get a competent management and policy system in place and we and the country will back you.

But the organisation and methods will have to change.

I'll give you a three one on the letter to Mark Thompson of the BBC

Keep it up.

Now Foreign nationals are to be given some of the TOP POLICE JOBS in the name of DIVERSITY

"Bernard Hogan-Howe, the new Metropolitan Commissioner, said as many as one in 10 staff at inspector rank or above could be parachuted in.

He said women and those from ethnic minorities have achieved “far more and far more quickly” in other industries and indicated they should now be targeted and fast-tracked to make senior police ranks more representative.

High-flying police officers could also be allowed to leapfrog ranks to get to the top quicker, he said.

Mr Hogan-Howe also said that he is in talks with the Home Office and Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, in a bid to protect the Met from budget cuts before next year’s Olympics.

He repeated his pledge of a “total war” on crime and warned drug dealers to expect to have their “doors put in”

The police have long been criticised for a poor representation of women and ethnic minorities, and moves to boost diversity have often fallen short of targets.

In an interview with the Police Review magazine, published today, Mr Hogan-Howe suggested proposals to shake up traditional entry levels for the police could be used to improve diversity.

They would be brought in above the rank of constable and undergo fast-track training. He said: “I think there is some option for some of the people selected at middle and senior management to come from outside.

“I might take 10 per cent who, after two to three years’ training, are up to strength, and have an open mind about whether it is at inspector rank or superintendent.”

Asked if such a move would help diversity, he added: “I think so because, if you look at certain areas of society, women and black and ethnic minorities are over-represented. If you look at graduates, there are more women than men.

“In certain industries, women and ethnic minorities have achieved far more and far more quickly than in the police.

“If we are recruiting from that pool, we will have a lot more chance of being more representative of society.”

Mr Hogan-Howe disclosed that negotiations were under way to ensure that Met numbers were not hit before the 2012 Olympics.

Police forces are facing budget cuts of up to 20 per cent over the next four years with the heaviest falling in the first two years.

He said: “We are in discussions with Boris Johnson and Kit Malthouse, of the Metropolitan Police Authority, who are talking with the Home Office to see if we can maintain our police numbers for a longer period.”"

--------------------------------

You only need a different Skin Colour, be born abroad or a non NATIVE Brit and you can be responsible for attacking the INDIGENOUS POPULATION without fear or favour.

Who represents US the INDIGENOUS ENGLISH, IRISH, SCOTTISH and WELSH ?

NO ONE