Thursday 14 July 2011

MANIPULATION OF THE MEDIA

The frenzy over the media hacking scandle goes on and is the hot topic at present taking precedence over our serious debt problems and unjust wars.

Why is this?

The reason is that the major parties have at last an opportunity to collectively attack Rupert Murdoch and his over powerful media group.
Previously they feared to cross him lest he used his considerable media clout to back an opposing party.


That is why Blair and now Cameron were in so much contact with this over powerful man.

No doubt other papers are guilty of the same misdemeanours but not on such a large or blatant scale.
The fact remains that the media barons are too powerful and should, all of them be cut down to size.

That is why we invariably get as a party a bad press as our policies are against the global capitalism which sustains these tycoons and makes them wealthy.


THEY ARE A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.

It is also why free thinking people must use such blogs as this to promote alternative views.

The media monopoly of news has its equivalent threat to democracy in our party with the present leadership bending the truth and on occasion spreading outright lies about their opponents within the party.

The rules of the current election have been deliberately constructed to give the present leader an advantage and then broken to consolidate that advantage. The hierarchy of the party depend on the present leader for their jobs and thus obey his every instruction, however misguided that is.

Insults and character assasinations have been their stock in trade while valid questions have received no answer.

I am not accusing any of the hierarchy of phone hacking, but some of their underhand methods are as shameful as those employed by News International.

I and others received a letter (possibly against the electoral rules made up by Nick)from the poodle Mike Whitby with a raft of allegations against the challenger which are patently untrue.

The allegations are not accompanied by answers to the many questions which have been put to head office and can easily be refuted.

The fact that there is something wrong with the present party is shown by those who support the challenger, Sharon Wilkinson, Dave Shapcott, Martin and Tina Wingfield, Arthur Kemp, Mike Howson, Richard Edmonds,John Walker, and John Bean former editor of "Identity" and even Briam Mahoney head of financial scrutiny.

These are long standing nationalists who have worked hard for our cause unlike many of the officials now in control, and if people of this quality believe that change is needed their views should be listened to.

They know what is going on or has gone on and they are obviously not satisfied.

As I am not an official I have a right and possibly a duty to the party to bring these matters into the open.

In the party at present we do not have a free press and are thus little better than Murdoch in the twisting and distortion of the truth.

We must combat the threat to national democracy in the national press, but we can only do that if we have democracy in the party.

We do not have that at present.

We must be squeaky clean, and set an example.

WE ARE NOT NOW.

THAT IS WHY WE NEED CHANGE SO THAT WE CAN RESCUE THE PARTY AND THE NATIONALIST CAUSE FROM ITS DOWNWARD SPIRAL.

One man's interests must not take precedence over our cause.

MORE THAN EVER OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE NEED A THRIVING NATIONALIST PARTY.

WE MUST NOT AND WILL NOT LET THEM DOWN

yaz