Something In Common.......but what's their purpose?

This post is very much more of a visual post than a written one...... or, which can be classed as "actions speak louder than words."Anyway, after doing a bit of post election 'research' and certainly looking more at the local elections - I came across a few photographs in relation to the day and something stirred my curious and inquisitive grey matter!

Now, we all know that "New Labour" employed the rather expensive services of Blue Digital Services..... this very specialist company that orchestrated, manipulated, propagated and delivered Barack Obama to the White House across the pond the other year. And who this year masterminded the anti-BNP propaganda/pro- Labour nonsense - which worked by and large very successfully in the key constituencies up and down the country.

It is also well known that Wigan council had hired earlier this year - some of their very own specialist experts to educate their much high-ranking council officials and representatives on how to combat the "rise" of the local British National Party! But....just what else did these leaders in their field educate them on and just who where these people?Anyway, considering I wasn't going to say much here we go.......

Looking at the above I am sure you'll recognise quite a few of the faces shown....you may struggle with the last picture? The picture directly above shows the annual congregation of the
Portuguese Commie Party (I think the picture brings it home a little better) So..............

Can anyone spot what I'm getting at??

The Fist Salute........The raised fist (also known as the clenched fist) is a salute and logo most often used by leftist activists, such as: Marxists, anarchists, socialists, communists, pacifists, trade unionists, and black nationalists. The raised fist is usually regarded as an expression of solidarity, strength or defiance.

A PORTENT OF DISASTER

Just got back from Cockermouth having discussed with Clive Jefferson our plans for our future push. While there I read in yesterday's Daily Mail the horrifying revelation shown below. How can our small country absorb all these people most of them from alien cultures? How can we provide the infrastructure and houses for them without destroying our country. How will we feed ourselves in future?
The headline shows the magnitude of our task and it's importance to the future of our country.It will encourage our party members to continue our struggle to save our land.

YES WE DID WELL in the elections nearly trebling our vote, but it is not fast enough.


As most of the immigrants have large families it is evident that within 30 years we will be in a minority and no longer able to assert our rights in a democratic way in our own country. Even now when immigrant numbers are not the majority they are pandered to in order to placate them and massive voter fraud has been uncovered.

We of the British National Party campaign for our rights and freedoms through the ballot box in spite of the violence and electoral fraud directed against us.
We do NOT condone the violence of the EDL preferring debate but if this onslaught of people and anti British legislation continues violence WILL increase as people's frustrations boil over.

If the politicians in power give our party fairness a solution could be brought to this looming disaster. If however we, as the voice of reason are not heeded and the rapid invasion of those of different cultures and norms continues street fighting and civil war beckons.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS as Neville Chamberlain found, and as Churchill said--
WE SHALL NEVER GIVE IN.

THE GRIM RIPA

RIPA – A Brief History

Britain has an intrusive culture of state snooping which has attracted much negative attention internationally. But the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) is a particularly unpleasant feature of it. As The New York Times put it,3
It has become commonplace to call Britain a “surveillance society,” a place where security cameras lurk at every corner, giant databases keep track of intimate personal details and the government has extraordinary powers to intrude into citizens’ lives. …
Under the [RIPA] law, the localities and agencies can film people with hidden cameras, trawl through communication traffic data like phone calls and Web site visits and enlist undercover “agents” to pose, for example, as teenagers who want to buy alcohol.
RIPA4 was introduced by the Labour Government in 2000; the Act was intended to make provision for and about
the interception of communications, the acquisition and disclosure of data relating to communications, the carrying out of surveillance, the use of covert human intelligence sources and the acquisition of the means by which electronic data protected by encryption or passwords may be decrypted or accessed;
to provide for Commissioners and a tribunal with functions and jurisdiction in relation to those matters,
to entries on and interferences with property or with wireless telegraphy
and to the carrying out of their functions by the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service and the Government Communications Headquarters; and for connected purposes.
On reading this, most people would imagine that these serious powers – to spy on people, without notice – were meant for law enforcement use against terrorists and crime kingpins. One might also presume, wrongly, that these powers are meant to be used sparingly in serious cases, rather than by council officials on members of the public, not convicted of any offence, in relation to trifling allegations. The “connected purposes” clause hinted at above has been extended in the legislation to include almost any alleged infraction.
The powers are “self-authorising” for Councils – that is to say that no external authority (such as a warrant from a court, or approval from a police officer) is required before they are used; the approval of one council official is enough to permit another council official to spy on a member of the public, potentially for months.
As their use has grown, these powers have been widely criticised. In November 2009, the House of Lords was told that non-law enforcement bodies (including Councils) were using their spying powers 200 times a week.

As a result, then-Home Secretary Alan Johnson announced that he would curb the ability of local authorities to use RIPA; he had apparently come to the view that junior council officials shouldn’t have the authority to order surveillance operations, including secret filming and eavesdropping, for (in his words) "trivial reasons", such as catching people putting out their rubbish on the wrong day or letting their dogs foul the street.

Key findings

- 372 local authorities in Great Britain have conducted RIPA surveillance operations in 8,575 cases in the past two years. This means that Councils alone have carried out over eleven surveillance operations every day in this country over the past two years
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne is the worst local authority in the country for RIPA investigations, having spied on their residents 231 times in two years
- Authorities have used covert surveillance to spy on their own employees – because they thought they were lying about their car parking (Darlington), work times (Exeter), sick pay (Hambleton, Hammersmith and Fulham) – or to spy on the wardens they employ to spot crime (Liverpool)
- Over a dozen authorities have used RIPA to spy on dog owners to see whose animals were responsible for dog fouling
- Five authorities have used their powers to spy on people suspected of breaking the smoking ban
- Suffolk County Council used RIPA powers to make a “test purchase” – of a puppy
- Bromley Council spied on a charity shop to see people “fly tipping” donations at their door


Big Brother and the Nanny State. Orwellian nightmares coming true.

http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/TheGrimRIPA.pdf