WE HAVE THE BBC, AUSTRIA HAS THE ORF. WE BELIEVE THEM ALL DON'T WE??

Repeat After Me: “Sieg Heil!” 

Our Austrian correspondent AMT reports on a seamy little incident that occurred recently at an FPÖ rally near Vienna:

This is interesting, especially in view of the usual Nazi-tactics employed by the political left. A journalist of the state-run TV station, financed by everyone (!) owning a television set, a computer, and/or a mobile phone (with the mere possibility of watching TV), whether or not one actually watches ORF programs, provokes the always peaceful FPÖ campaign rallies by infiltrating it with skinheads.

ORF is notorious for its lack of objectivity, especially in view of all things Muslim.

For instance:

• The Austrian Broadcasting Corporation (ORF) has been sugar-coating Islam and Turkey for many years and does not question Muslim claims
• For example: In the show “Killing for Allah?” the viewer is not told whether or not Islam provides a foundation for terrorism. Additional claims include:

  ·		Islam equals diversity. Yet there is the Muslim allegation that the presence of non-believers (kuffar) leading to conflict.
  ·		Terror in Great Britain was committed by British citizens. Why is the fact that the terrorists were naturalized Pakistanis neglected?
  ·		Muslims of French nationality claim they have no legal right to work and housing. This allegation needs to be elaborated on. It sounds implausible.
  ·		A Muslim may only fight in a war in the case of attack. However, what constitutes an attack? For instance, the presence of non-Muslims on Muslim territory is viewed as aggression.
  ·		British openness allows for hate preachers. It has not been explained that Western tolerance is being exploited by Muslims.
  ·		At a conference of imams in Vienna, Muslims in Austria were excluded. However, it was not explored how acceptance can be expected if the Western way of life is rejected and Westerners are considered “kuffar”.

• In a recent show about honor killings in Austria, Islam was not even mentioned and the practice was attributed to “patriarchy”.

The article below from SOS — Österreich was translated by Liz at Europe News:

ORF journalist sends Neo-Nazis to Strache demonstration!

An outrageous incident happened at a campaign rally for the Freedom Party in Wiener Neustadt [a city south of Vienna]. At the end of the rally, as [party leader Heinz-Christian] Strache worked the crowd, being photographed with some citizens, he met three men with shaven heads who said to him: “The [TV] camera is our photo.” Strache then turned around, remarking that this probably wouldn’t be possible, and continued signing autographs for other people.

- - - - - - - - -

Meanwhile, a journalist (who had previously been provoking) came up to the three shaven men and urged them to literally, “Come on, say it!” Whereupon one of the three skinheads shouted “Sieg Heil”.

Then Strache replied: “I heard that. You have summoned these people to come here.” The FPÖ leader insisted that the police record the skinheads’ personal information, and explained that he wanted to file charges.

When the police recorded the personal details, it turned out that [one of the men] was Edward Moschitz from the ORF editorial “On the scene”. With a low-life method of manipulation, he placed three neo-Nazis [at the rally] and prepared everything in order to let them shout Nazi slogans which he then documented. Moschitz also admitted that he had known the three skinheads and that he had accompanied them for a few days. According to the Prohibition Act [Verbotsgesetz] he has made himself an accomplice.

We have done some research on this ORF journalist Mr. Moschitz — on Facebook we found some interesting information — he is a fan of SOS MITMENSCH [a leftist organization], AUDIMAX SIT-IN [students who took over the largest auditorium at Vienna University in fall 2009], STERMANN + GRISSEMANN [two left-wing comedians],…. that’s enough to know in which part of the political spectrum this ORF man feels most comfortable!

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/03/repeat-after-me-sieg-heil.html

Morg
.

UNIVERSITY CUTS

The news of cuts to university funding has predictably caused concern among students and staff at those universities with student sit ins etc.
I can understand their anger but have to ask whether many of these courses are worth funding in the current climate.
The cuts amount it is said to 1.6% of total funding.
Many firms can make these cuts by greater efficiency, but then they have to produce a product that consumers want to buy.

Many of the courses on offer are well known to be "Mickey Mouse" courses which achieve little in the job prospects of students and load them with huge debts.
These students have been betrayed into thinking that there is a vast market for Media studies, drama, psychology, ancient history etc and are disillusioned when they find no jobs available, meanwhile companies complain that they can not recruit enough scientists and engineers.

Nursing is now a degree course and while some nursing graduates are necessary many of these graduates fail in the TLC aspect of the job and are too proud to actually nurse.

I believe students in disciplines which are essential to our national survival should be totally funded by government while the "soft" subjects should be dropped.
This of course will not be done. Many top politicians did Politics, Philosophy and Economics"(PPE), a completely useless course. Politics is a matter of opinion and has no scientific basis. I've not yet found out what Philosophy REALLY is or what use it is in the real world and the economists are responsible for the country's woes.

Spending will have to be cut but it is essential that vital scientific courses should be funded to a greater extent.
With intelligent allocation of resources we could save money and improve education standards in "hard" subjects while ceasing to delude thousands of indebted students that a well paid job awaits them on graduation instead of flipping burgers which is all their "qualifications" will get them.

Oh, and stop foreign students taking so many places thus allowing more British students a chance.
But then universities are regarded not so much as educational establishments as private profit seeking enterprises which is the anithesis of what their real purpose should be.