An article in the Skelmersdale Champion on 30/9/09 has the headline "BNP SLURS TOWN".
This is a reaction to a post on the BNP website criticising new towns which mentioned Skem.
Of course with the New labour slant on all they print they try to suggest that we are criticising the people of Skem.
THAT IS NOT SO.The post sympathised with the people obliged to live there who were duped into believing they were going to be housed in a new Utopia.
The post criticised the general architecture of the town and compared the moving of people there into Soviet style houses was akin to moving Scousers to a reservation as was done to native Americans.
The houses are ill designed and cost a fortune to heat and the general layout of the town does not address peoples need for community.
The town is constructed around the car with little pedestrian consideration and the houses have communal car parking and often little privacy.They were built as a social experiment and took more notice of archtects grandiose plans than people's needs.
The fact that over the past 20 years expensive modifications had to be put in place proves this.
Tenants who complained of damp in the poorly insulated houses were told it was condensation and to open the windows, a rather expensive remedy.
Of course the local Labour councillor was trotted in to voice her disgust as is typical of this rag.
No response was asked from our party.
The fact that Skem is ill built is no refection on the people obliged to live there. Our post showed our sympathy with the people who have suffered by this experiment.
A final word on the Skem Champion rag and a way to judge its quality and accuracy. THEY GOT THE DATE OF THE BNP POST WRONG.
The post was on SEPTEMBER 26th and not August 26th as stated in the article.
A LOCAL BLOG SUPPORTING THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE AND ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN AND LEIGH IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST FASCISM, THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT AND FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT. - "NO FOREIGN PRINCE, PERSON, PRELATE, STATE OR POTENTATE HATH, OR OUGHT TO HAVE, ANY JURISDICTION, POWER, SUPERIORITY, PRE-EMINENCE, OR AUTHORITY, ECCLESIASTICAL OR SPIRITUAL, WITHIN THIS REALM" (ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689)
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
ENGLAND v UKRAINE
Anyone else out there feel they know the REAL reason that the England match will not be shown in any pubs and clubs and will only be shown live on the internet on Saturday evening?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)