Tuesday 5 January 2010

Fears over influx of right-to-settle Gurkhas

If they were Muslim there wouldn't be any problem.
We should accept ALL GHURKAS and thier familys, we will have plenty of Houses, Jobs, School places etc after we have returned quite a few million Islamists back home, to the places where they can worship and terrorise freely.

"Military charities voiced concern today over their ability to cope with the numbers of former Gurkhas coming to them for help."

One predicted that up to 12,000 Gurkhas could apply for UK residency over the next three years after winning the right to settle here last year, with fears that many will need accommodation and basic equipment on arrival.

Paul Cummings, from the Army Benevolent Fund, said a dozen families had already approached his charity during the two weeks before Christmas." .............................................

"He said: "Having not been through any preparation in Nepal prior to arrival, they're coming here with no resources to back them up and no means of sustaining themselves."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fears-over-influx-of-righttosettle-gurkhas-1858107.html


How many Bogus Asylum seekers and Illegal immigrants have come here with enough money to settle, a place stay or a job to go to without taking from the state? Probably none.

The Ghurkas have a proud place in our history and Armed Forces. How many Muslims are Fighting for our Army and Country ?

I know there's plenty fighting against our Army and Country.


Ghurkas = YES

Muslims = NO

Taking Liberties.

The brass neck quote of 2009 comes from Jack Straw, the justice minister and one of the architects of the new democratic authoritarianism in Britain. On the eve of the Convention on Modern Liberty last February, he wrote, "I hope that in the final reckoning even some of our harshest critics will concede that this Labour government has done more than any before it to extend liberties and to constrain government."

Of course, there is no such thing as a final reckoning because the struggle between government and individual liberty, waged from one generation to the next, is endless; but at year's end we can produce annual accounts, which in 2009 have two main headlines and, unsurprisingly, contradict Jack's mischievous little fib.

The first is that the government and enemies of liberty in the civil service have not lost their ambition to create a highly controlled and monitored society. They are pressing ahead with the National Identity Register and the ID card. The Independent Safeguarding Authority began vetting and barring millions of people who have glancing contact with minors and the vulnerable. The surveillance of our streets and motorways increased without public scrutiny and debate; the gathering and retention of DNA from innocent people was unaffected by the European court of human rights judgment. The plans to collect vast quantities of data from our communications and internet usage and from our movements across British borders remain unchanged, despite the vast hole in public finances and feints by ministers to give the impression they were responding to civil liberties concerns.

The project is more or less the same as it was this time last year. What has changed is that there are many more people who are aware of it and are worried by this or that encroachment by the state. It is clear that the Tories have taken to heart some of the arguments made during the Convention on Modern Liberty by such people as Lord Bingham, Sir Ken MacDonald, Philip Pullman, Lady Kennedy, Dominic Grieve and Chris Huhne. The convention may not have founded a movement but it did shift opinion at a time when the economy seemed to be the only important issue.

This was met by an operation of flat denial from Labour loyalists in the media, the latest example of which came in last week's New Statesmen where the chief political commentator of the Independent Steve Richards wrote this bewildering end to a really interesting piece about the decline of parliamentary power and the rise of the civil servant. "Many excellent journalists are obsessed with the threat to civil liberties in Britain. The threat is an imagined one. People in this country have never been freer. But while they fret pointlessly, Britain sleepwalks away from democracy"

This is typical of the Westminster elite, which spends so much time obsessing about power and personalities that its members fail to read the laws being passed on their watch. He rails against the rise of the unaccountable power of civil servants and the decline of parliament without seeing that the result was of course a broad ranging attack on personal liberty. It's not just a few obsessive journalists outside the Westminster loop saying it but the ex director of MI5, the former chief law lord, the former attorney general and at least two reports from parliamentary committees. And of course his analysis takes no account of Blair's dislike of parliament, the increased use of the guillotine under Labour, the reduction in parliamentary hours, the reliance on secondary legislation to avoid debate and scrutiny, the neglect of cabinet government and the lies and the distortion of the political process that enabled one man to take Britain to war in Iraq. These were the weapons used to attack democracy and liberty and they were wielded by a ruthless cabal of Labour politicians.

One of the important themes of the year was the emergence of effective campaigns run by small, mobile activist groups like End Child Detention Now, which attacks the policy of holding children of asylum seekers in Borders Agency prisons; Fitwatch, which has turned the surveillance cameras on to the police; and the Manifesto Group which alerted the public to the Kafkaesque CRB checks by the Independent Safeguarding Authority and also campaigns against the visa restrictions for visiting artists and academics.

So much of what I have been writing this year has been sparked by policies of the Home Office, the UK Borders Agency and the Justice Ministry, which of course are essentially the same organism. Part of the difficulty in our system is to work out where policy comes from, how it is developed by ministries and whose agenda is being pushed. I see no reason why civil servants should be protected from exposure and criticism or why those with an agenda that is hostile to freedom should not be hauled before open committees. Steve Richards is dead right to worry about the power of civil servants.

But if I have one overriding concern in 2009 it is about the British police, which every day seem more like a force than a service, whether it is displaying violence at legitimate demonstrations, making secret databases of political and environmental activists, swooping with unnecessary might on innocent people such as the rock band the Thirst, making arrests to add to the DNA database, Tasering members of the public as punishment or treating football supporters with a shocking disregard for their rights. It has been a bad year for the police, and a worrying one for the general public who see an essential trust and respect being lost. The next government must find a way of bringing the police under control and making them realise that they are the servants, not the masters, of the public.


Labour to offer Arabic and Mandarin lessons to primary pupils

"Labour will announce today that primary school children will be able to learn Mandarin and Arabic in a bid to keep up with other countries.

Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, who was the first minister to line up his guns in the election battle, has also promised to boost education spending and guarantee extra tuition for (Foreign) children who fall behind at a young age.

Teaching unions welcomed the commitment to increase spending on schools.".........


It's your Children and Grandchildrens education that will suffer .


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article6975147.ece

Will they never learn ?

Released Guantanamo inmates go back to thier day jobs.


"At least a dozen former Guantánamo Bay inmates have rejoined al-Qaeda to fight in Yemen, The Times has learnt, amid growing concern over the ability of the country’s Government to accept almost 100 more former inmates from the detention centre.

The Obama Administration promised to close the Guantánamo facility by January 22, a deadline that it will be unable to meet. The 91 Yemeni prisoners in Guantánamo make up the largest national contingent among the 198 being held."

.........

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6975971.ece


Dark clouds of xenophobia over Europe

FFS.....Who do these people think they are.


You would think that Christian Suicide Bombers and Christian Terrorist Fanatics have been blowing Planes out of the sky, Blowing Tube Trains and Buses up.

Have a read of this piece of Islamist whinging. And this is only over Minarets


"It breaches many of the fundamental principles that European civilisations have been built on. The widespread belief is that the ban is likely to be overturned by the Swiss Supreme Court or under the EU Convention on Human Rights. But this distracts from the crucial anguish on how such a tranquil and conservative country can become so intolerant to impose such draconian measures on the symbols of a religion followed by nearly a quarter of the world’s population."


"Europe itself owes much of its renaissance on advances made by Muslim architects at a time when the continent was living through the Dark Ages."

Maybe it was called the Dark Ages because of ISLAM.

"Britain is unique in Europe for its respect for Islam and other minority faiths and their practises. However, with the coming general election, there are dangers that Muslims may be ‘easy fodder’ to win cheap support. There are already indications that UKIP, under its new Chairman, Lord Pearson, may be prepared to play the BNP anti Islam card. "


The full article is here.

http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/paper/index.php?article=4412

Why David Cameron is more of a friend to Labour than William Hague

"British politics appear more consensual than suggested by Prime Minister’s Question Time, with the Conservative Party backing Labour legislation more times under David Cameron than under his three predecessors.

Researchers from the University of Nottingham found that the Conservatives voted against the principle of only one in five pieces of government legislation since Mr Cameron’s election as leader. Under William Hague, they voted against two out of every five; and under Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Howard they opposed one in three."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6975615.ece

We Can't Go On Like This.


We want and need REAL CHANGE, that's why you should vote for the TRUE party of OPPOSITION to the main three (Same Clothes, Different Colour) parties...BNP.


It's not just your future you should be thinking of.

British Jobs for Foreign Workers

"Tens of thousands of foreign IT workers are being sent to work for their companies’ subsidiaries in Britain, sparking fears that British workers are being denied job opportunities.

Almost 30,000 non-EU technology workers entered the country under so-called intra-company transfers last year, with the overwhelming majority coming from India."


Remember Gormless Brown hijacking "British Jobs For British Workers" slogan.


http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/support_services/article6975922.ece



Bankruptcy hanging like a cloud over Labour's election campaign

"Labour has been forced to scrap a planned manifesto meeting of its National Policy Forum on cost grounds, just before a campaign in which Conservatives are preparing to out-spend it by a factor of about three to one"

"
An impoverished Labour Party will be unable to return fire against the Conservatives’ pre-election advertising blitz for months, amid fears that it could
emerge from the campaign bankrupt."

"
The financial problems afflicting Labour hit hardest in 2006, amid allegations that big individual donations and loans were linked to honours. Sir Gulam Noon, the curry magnate, who lent Labour £250,000 before being nominated for a peerage, said yesterday that he had not been contacted about funding this year’s election campaign, even though he remains a committed party supporter. His loan was repaid in full in July 2008, but others who chose not to convert loans into donations, including Rod Aldridge, the former head of Capita, and Richard Caring, the owner of The Ivy restaurant, are still owed money. "

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6976038.ece

If New Labour can't keep it's own finances in good order how do you expect them to look after the countrys finances ?
And why are Business men LENDING New Labour tens of thousands of pounds....What do they get out of it, and with Union dues what do the Unions get out of it ?

MORG IN AN ARGUMENT

'
HERE IN THIS COMMENT THREAD ON ANOTHER WEBLOG.

And here's the original article that comment thread belongs to:

http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2010/01/ed-balls-brother-is-so-confident-in.html

You'll see it started off as an attempt to recruit a black Zulu member. No, this isn't a call for help - I think my Zulu opponent has left the field in defeat (hahahaha - that's quite normal to a Welshman) ... and I have some general support there from people who are not even party supporters, and some who are. And it was quite a lengthy argument. It ends with my comment about mind-reading - but if Stan returns, I will go back to it.

So do just have a read and find out some of the stuff Morg gets up to when he's not here at home. Be aware though - there is a language warning in place. If you don't like foul language then don't go there. It is what's known as a swearblog, and just as we like to say: "When in Rome, do as the Romans do", so I do my fair share. As I'm an ex-serviceman from back in the days when everyone got beastings, then as you might imagine, my fair share can be pretty impressive. My language fits in with whatever is appropriate where I happen to be.

So you've had your warning.

You'll have to scroll down about half way before I make a showing.

Morg
.

Is there an Election coming up ?

Wavey Davey (Cameron) says "We can't go on like this."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/6932576/David-Camerons-slogan-we-cant-go-on-like-this-was-used-by-Thatcher-on-immigration.html

Your right Dave WE can't. We have heard very very little about Immigration from Dave and the Tories but there's an Election coming up and IMMIGRATION is going to play a huge part in it.
The LibLabCon are much of a muchness on this issue, and Dave using an old Thatcher slogan still doesn't tell us what he and his party are going to do about Immigration.
If by using an old statement of Thatchers maybe he is hoping to emulate her.
Which, in regards to Immigration means WHAT DAVE ?
It means NOTHING.
Did Thatcher and/or the Conservatives halt Immigration in their time in office ?

"
More controversially, Mrs Thatcher also made the comment once she was in Downing Street as she tried to stop the continued arrival of Vietnamese “boat people” in Britain. "

So the answer is No !
Though God loves a trier.

But your right Dave "WE can't go on like this".
The Country feels the same way, which is why the BNP now have 2 MEPs, . And the way things are looking we should end up with seats in Parliament.

But a couple of thing's worry me about this up-coming Election.
1) Postal Vote fraud.
Which seems to be the preference of ASIAN voters and Candidates (of the main 3 parties)

2)Who can vote.
Earlier this year I recieved a pamphlet from Wigan MBC called YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE. This is what it says inside....
"Members of Parliament and local Councillors represent you. They are elected to make decisions on a National and Local level. These decisions have an impact on our lives, so make sure you have the right to vote by keeping the register up to date. If you don't register, we assume that you don't live there and could lose your right to vote.

It's also worth knowing that CREDIT and LOAN COMPANIES check to see if your name is on the register of electors. if you are not registered, you may not be able to open a bank account, get a credit card, mortgage or any other form of credit, loan or contract.

WHO CAN REGISTER TO VOTE
Residents OVER 16 years of age who are:
British Citizens
Citizens of the IRISH REPUBLIC
Commonwealth Citizens (see note on back of registration form)
Citizens OF OTHER EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES ".
.......................................................................................................

Now with Britain no longer being a Sovereign Nation and part of the EUSSR does this mean that any
Citizens OF OTHER EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES not resident here can vote?
How about the Irish Republic ?
What about British Citizens ? New Labour have been throwing passports out to every Tom Dick or Al Queda and calling them British.
How many Asians have DUAL Citizenship ?
How many Immigrants have been given the vote?
After the admission by New Labours Andrew Neather to Gerrymandering and Social Engineering, through Immigration, to "RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN IT". New Labour are willing to comit acts of TREASON and then boast about it, we should ALL be worried.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

"We can't go on like this" says Dave but more than likely they will.
Remember the Home's for Votes scandal ? Dame Shirley Porter, surcharged £42 Million (total inc interest) for gerrymandering?

http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=2138

The Tories Gerrymander, New labour Gerrymander. The Tories tax us to the hilt, New Labour tax us to the hilt, Tories all but destroyed manufacturing, New Labour continued to Destroy what was left.etc, etc, etc.
The only real difference is the party Colour, and we need more than a change of Colour.

"WE CAN'T GO ON LIKE THIS".

That's why people will be voting BNP.


WHAT IS LABOUR DOING TO OUR LAND?

These so called "British Muslims" attended court this week on charges of incitement during their demonstration against the returning soldiers of the Anglian Regiment in Luton last year.
To call any muslim as British is an oxymoron and especially these ugly bu****s who show their antithesis to all British values by their medieval dress.
I would send them back for being ugly. In court they refused to stand for the magistrate (which is contempt of court and carries a prison sentence)and were allowed time off for prayers. Special arrangements were made for them so they did not have to stand.
Why should this anti British scum be accorded privelidges denied to the rest of us REAL BRITS? After all this is OUR country and if they are allowed to be here (they shouldn't be) they should abide by our laws.
Nick Griffin was threatened with jail for calling islam "a wicked vicious faith" (which it has shown itself to be) but this trash seems to get away with saying anything including beheading those with whom they disagree.

Now muslims threaten to have a procession in Wooton Bassett, a little town which all too regularly mourns our soldiers killed in these barbaric hell holes and the purpose? To mourn our enemies who have killed our young soldiers.
It is as if there was a parade in WW2 to commemorate Nazis who killed our soldiers in that war and is an insult to us.

Good on Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons to say they will go and personally block their passage.
I will join them, not as a BNP member but as an ordinary Brit who respects our traditions and mourns the needless sacrifice of our young soldiers in this illegal war.
I don't care what muslims do in their own countries, whether the women are educated or even if they have food or medicine. But I do care about my own young people being sacrificed by an immoral government for the sake of a country populated by rabble like these ugly sods.

They are showing their true beliefs and people are increasingly seeing it. We must rid our country of this cancer in our midst or we will cease to exist as a people.

However I think the march will be banned as it will cause more people to support the BNP.

FEAR THE WITCH (NO, NOT TALKING ABOUT THE THATCHERWITCH)

.
Fear has a long history, and the idea of control-by-fear has a history that's only five minutes less than that. Keeping control of a pack of hominids by being the biggest and nastiest was a simple step and an easy one to cope with. Everyone knew who the biggest and nastiest one was and everyone knew to keep on his good side. Nothing devious or sneaky required by Big'n'Nasty, although underlings might engage in sneakiness to get their own way without being battered. Big'n'Nasty ruled by fear.

When man overcame his fear of fire, he soon realised that all the other animals were still afraid of it. Fire could keep predators away and also cook food and provide warmth. It was no longer just a matter of being big and nasty. Power lay with the one who could make fire. About now, the whole business of politics got under way because Big'n'Nasty worked out that it wasn't who controlled fire that mattered, it was who controlled the one who controlled fire. It's been downhill from there ever since.

When Fire Controller came under the protection of Big'n'Nasty, he thought he was on to a good thing. Already held in high regard, he now had a huge and vicious bodyguard. What he didn't realise was that he was just Big'n'Nasty's way of staying in charge because anyone who wanted to see Fire Controller had to get past Big'n'Nasty first.

This sparked an idea in the proto-Righteous of the time. It was impossible to split the rule when there was only one ruler, but now there were two. So, for example, Big'n'Nasty could be convinced that Fire Controller was untrustworthy, or that others wanted to take Fire Controller and run away to start a new tribe. Big'n'Nasty would need advisors and spies to keep an eye on things. Now, nobody could get to Big'n'Nasty without going through his advisers first. The Righteous took control without having to challenge Big'n'Nasty, and they had him as a threat if their orders weren't obeyed.


Read it all - it is very good. Excellent even. Give it to your kids to read:

http://underdogsbiteupwards.blogspot.com/2010/01/fear-witch-for-it-is-you.html

Now THIS is the kind of person who should be a teacher. Kids would lap it up - and his classes would have no disruption because the kids would be just too damned interested in what he was saying. I've seen him do this sort of thing with several quite complex topics.

However ... how long do we think it would be before the Righteous found an excuse to sack him?

For giving the game away.

Silly Kuffar mentioned teachers and teaching earlier on ... only generally they're not teachers and they're not teaching unless it's homosex and masturbation lessons to five-year-olds. Real teachers are not allowed anywhere near our schools. The best teacher I ever encountered in my entire life was actually an Education Officer in the RAF - and I've experienced education at primary, secondary, undergraduate and postgraduate levels (and trade education in the Air Force, of course, from the age of 15 at RAF Halton, Bucks).

And why was he so good? - because he never told us a single damned thing in two years of teaching - he made us tell him. He spent all that time asking us questions, every question being a tiny bit in advance of the last question we had worked out and answered. Worked for me ... I still remember the stuff he taught some 40+ years later.

Of course, it did mean he had to work hard at it - first he had to understand the minds of the boys he was teaching and how those minds worked; and he had to prepare all his lesson plans well in advance ... oh wait, now I understand why modern education is as useful as a bacon buttie at a Muslim wedding.

Problem sorted.

Morg
.

UKIP in TROUBLE.

This is taken from London Patriot Blog in regards to Lord Pearson's attempted betrayal of UKIP and it's members.


The new “Leader” of UKIP has come in for some criticism from certain members of the top table. His statement that, “If the Tories gave a concrete agreement to have a Referendum on “that” Treaty, then he saw no reason for UKIP to exist” (para). Did that put the cat amongst the pigeons or what!!!

Now Gerard Batten, the only high profile UKIP member with the courage of his convictions has thrown his pennyworth. ”Oh! what a tangled web we weave” etc.

I present the whole press release.

PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Press Release

Gerard Batten MEP

Response to Lord Pearson’s offer of an electoral deal with the Tories

I read with appalled incredulity the front page of the Times on Saturday 28th November in which it was revealed that as Nigel Farage’s messenger, Lord Pearson offered to stand UKIP down at the next general election, if the Tories promised a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. I have read with almost equal incredulity the response put out by the UKIP Press Office today.

Nigel Farage and Lord Pearson had no authority to make this offer. It amounts to a betrayal of UKIP and its members, the vast majority of whom have expressed their opposition to any kind of electoral deals when given the opportunity to do so.

Lord Pearson won UKIP’s leadership contest without mentioning the proposed deal. Throughout the six hustings meetings in November he heard the thunderous applause I received when I said that under my leadership ‘there would be no deals with the Tories or anyone else’. Had he spoken up before the campaign there would have been a completely different result.

If the Conservative or Labour Party wish to offer a referendum on EU membership they are perfectly at liberty to do so without any offers from UKIP. This matter was never discussed with the UKIP MEPs, the elected representatives of the Party. Had it been a number of us would have resisted it and demanded that it first be put to a vote by the entire Party membership.

If it were agreed by the National Executive Committee at the time the offer was made in June, as now being indicated by Nigel Farage in the UKIP Press Office Press Release, then I challenge the Party Chairman to publish the relevant section of the NEC minutes and prove it.

Such an offer is against clause 3.1 of the UKIP Constitution that says, ‘The Party shall take part in all democratic electoral processes. It shall contest Westminster and European Parliamentary elections…’ This is not a case of ‘country before party’ but a case of putting the Tory party before UKIP.

Lord Pearson has been quoted as saying that he is still prepared to do deals. How can we expect candidates to incur all the time, trouble and expense of standing for the general election when they don’t know if they will be stood down in an electoral deal to be done with those who have betrayed our country for decades and who cannot be trusted to honour any deal they may make?

I ask all the UKIP members who are equally appalled as I am to stay in the Party and oppose any electoral deals.

Gerard Batten
Member of the European Parliament for London
UK Independence Party

EUKIP farewell?


http://www.londonpatriot.org/2010/01/04/ukip-in-trouble/

Their Rights. Our Rights

Theft is Theft is Theft is Theft.


"MORE than 400 MPs have received demands to repay excessive expenses claims, it emerged yesterday. "
.........
"The MPs are said to have hired legal experts to assert that the 1689 Bill of Rights protects them from prosecution. "


Does The Bill of Rights not apply to us mere mortals too ?


Liars, Buggers, Thieves and TRAITORS !


http://express.lineone.net/posts/view/149548/400-MPs-told-to-hand-back-their-dodgy-expenses


Incompetence.

Has any British Government since the 50's had any foreward planning ?
We used to have massive supplies of Coal, North Sea Oil and Gas.
What did they do with it all?
And HOW are OUR PENSIONERS going to cope?


"
SHIVERING Britain faces the prospect of gas supply shortages as the worst cold spell in 30 years keeps a stranglehold on the country."


http://express.lineone.net/posts/view/149760/Gas-supplies-running-out-as-Britain-faces-big-freeze

yaz