Saturday, 31 December 2011

FRIENDS IN HIGH (AND LOW) PLACES

It's New Year's Eve again and we have the usual list of those deemed by the government worthy of "honours".
This charade is a demonstration of who the government holds in high regard and in so doing throws a spotlight on their values.

The knighthood "for services to the arts" bestowed on a man who reputably made £100 million betting on the downfall of Northern Rock (not a very productive way to make your money).
His half million donation to the Tory party was incidental and even though he has engaged in and represents the worst aspects of the corrupt banking system he is considered good enough to be knighted.

Then we have Gerald Ronson, a jailed thief and fraudster rehabilitated after his spell at Her Majesty's pleasure, for his work for charity, no doubt subsidised by the money he has creamed from the banking and property businesses to which he returned following his release.

People may remember his co defendant Guinness who developed Alzheimers in jail and was released early when he made a miraculous recovery, the first recorded instance of a cure for that disease.

Then we have the thug and ex drug dealer who received an award for not returning to his former criminal activities (yet) who also got an award, for being black I presume as I've heard of no young white ex thugs who have been so honoured, nor of the millions of people who have helped their communities without first becoming a criminal

Golfers and various arty farty people have received gongs but few people who have contributed anything to our nation have received anything.

If I was offered an honour I would decline it, not wanting to be associated with the sleazy business men, so called sportsmen or theatrical luvvies, not that I ever would be and nor would any true patriot. And that says it all. It shows the priorities of the ruling elites and they sure as hell are not the people who have contributed to our nation.

One exception I would is Jonathan Ive who played a big part in the development of the I pad and showed what British people can do. Unfortunately he had to use his talents in the USA and his brilliance did little to help Britain finacially, but he did contribute something to human knowledge and wellbeing, unlike many of the others who are just parasites.

The Tories have shown that they are in hock to the sleazy worlds of business and finance with token appeasement actions to blacks and sportsmen (golfers mainly, what does that say about them?) and luvvies. But Labour are no different and in the past have awarded gongs to people of dubious value and repute.

If the honours system is to be of any value the highest should be given to those who have built up MANUFACTURING and other businesses providing employment rather than taking them over, breaking them up and selling them to foreigners.
Other awards should recognise campaigners and workers who seek to improve the lot of the ordinary person and indeed some are awarded to such people, but these will be people who do not question the status quo or rock the boat.

It is obvious the biggest gongs are given to the powerful people in the finance, media and posh sports categories while lesser gongs are thrown out like the late dictator of Haiti, Papa Doc threw out money to his impoverished citizens to keep them quiet.

Our system is hardly less corrupt than his was.

THE COST OF LIFE

I am sure you'll all agree that the senseless and unprovoked murder of Indian student Anuj Bidve, 23 in Salford on Boxing Day morning was a shocking act of inconceivable wanton violence of the very highest order and iterates just what our society has now become and how worthless someone's life is to others.

As we learn that the fifth person arrested in connection to the murder was from Leigh - we also understand that there is a £50,000 reward leading to the arrest and conviction of the killer and in addition will also be treated by the GMP as a "hate" crime as explained here below:

Speaking at a press conference yesterday, Chief Superintendent Kevin Mulligan said detectives were not ruling out that the shooting might have been racially motivated.

He said: 'A racially-motivated crime is when there is actual evidence to show that it is the actual motivation for the crime.'

He said a hate crime, 'by definition, is something that a community or anyone perceives is racially motivated'

Just click on this link here for a short video on who determines it may just be a hate crime:

In contrast to the above heinous crime take a look at the tragic murder that took place earlier in December in London:

A teenager has been viciously stabbed to death as he tried to flee a gang of youths.

The victim, named locally as Danny O'Shea, was chased and had his throat slashed outside his mother's front door in Newham, east London last night.

Sadly this has already been dropped by the mainstream media and no £50,000 reward for the conviction of the killers has been offered.

Is someone's life worth more dependent upon the colour of their skin?

Of course!

Friday, 30 December 2011

WHY "DONATE"

Nationalist readers of the BNP blog must by now have noticed every day there is a request to "Donate".
Million young people unemployed "Donate" is the latest offering.
There are no important elections imminent and anyhow in the past local branches have paid their own expenses during election campaigns, we certainly did.

Not only that we have not had an audited summary of the BNP's accounts for several years let alone accounts for the Trafalgar Club.

SO WHY THESE NEVER ENDING REQUESTS FOR DONATIONS?

Andrew Bron's shadow "Ideas" and Brent group manage without continually asking for money.

If a conference is called expenses can be recouped by a door collection.
If a local campaign is needed the money can be raised locally as we have done often in the past.

Of course my question above is rhetorical. The debts of the party are astronomical and have not been incurred in the promotion of our cause, rather by mis management, idiotic legal cases and top officials living off the fat of their contributors.

HOW THE BNP HAS SUNK from the heady days when we thought we had made the breakthrough and were frightening the opposition.
Now they just ignore us.

Nick Griffin seems determined to hang on to his position in spite of his bringing the Party to its knees. He must be able to see the rapid decline just by looking at the membership figures, local activities or even the poor attendance at meetings and the annual conference.

We nationalists are intelligent enough to see through him and his deceit. I accept I for too long had rose covered glasses but over the last twelve months my eyes have been opened to the chicanery and lack of any semblance of democracy in the party.

As evidence of Nick Griffin's financial deviousness is the incident of the seizure of his car for non payment of debt. He said in a vain attempt to get away with it said the car was on loan from Ian Kitchen.
Common sense would indicate that an MEP with a large salary and expenses would not have had to "loan" a clapped out Skoda from a Party member (and a strange brand of car for a nationalist leader to use). He had the cash to buy any car he wanted (like his wife has done).

This deviousness reflects badly on the Party and those who can not see through it are either blind or stupid.

We desparately need a new nationalist vehicle, a united grouping of all the strands of our cause, putting aside irrelevent doctrinal differences in order to save our country.

I would suggest all patriots follow Andrew Brons's paralell party and the Brent group who are seeking to unite these strands.

Nick Griffin by his deceit and toxicity is beyond the Pale as are those associated with him. They are a hindrence to Nationalism.

However the spirit of burns brightly among millions of people, not just those normally associated with our cause and our job is to harness this as yet hidden support..
Without Griffin and his ilk we can do it.

BTW I have learnt on the grapevine that my membership will not be renewed.
It's as if I have been expelled.

YOU DON'T NEED TO BOTHER EXPELLING ME OR MY WIFE!

WE WEREN'T INTENDING RENEWING IN ANY CASE.

I WOULD SUGGEST OTHER MEMBERS ALSO DO NOT RENEW.
Save your money from the bottomless pit of Griffin subsidising and join Andrew Brons where you will not be used as a cash cow but will still be able to contribute to the saving of our country.

THERE ARE MOVES AFOOT TO CREATE A CLEAN AND ELECTABLE GROUPING hopefully uniting all patriots.

WATCH THIS SPACE.

Monday, 26 December 2011

THE MADNESS OF THE SALES.

Stories abound in the media today of crowds rushing out in to what has become a post Christmas tradition, the sales.
To my mind all this is an indication of collective madness or hysteria induced by subtle commercial programming. That it is so important to the shops to encourage this madness shows how much of a margin they usually make on their wares.

Now I am as keen on a bargain as anyone else but I was told by my mother many years ago that a "bargain" that you did not need was not a bargain, but expensive.

Many of the things bought in the sales consist of cheap Chinese crap which are completely un necessary to anybody's standard of living. There are I realise some shoppers from the Far East who crowd the London shops for luxury goods (which is code for extravagent) but these are mainly made abroad and apart from the shop's profits bring little in to our country.
It will be of little benefit to our manufacturing industry.

This seasonal madness does not benefit our country. It helps the shops but increases imports and does not in my opinion increase the total happiness of the people even when not bought on credit.
Unnecessary goods bought on credit bring the misery of a debt slave to those participating and only help shops, bankers and foreign manufacturers.

Next year will be hard for everybody as a result of excessive personal and government spending and we will need all we can save. Far better to reduce debts and save our money as the future looks bleak.

So I shall not be visiting the sales and thus not be tempted to waste my money. That will remain in my pocket, ready for a rainy day.

On that bleak note I hope all have had a happy Christmas and that we all will not be too hard hit next year by the looming economic turmoil.

Remember relationships with family and friends are more important than cheap (or dear) baubles and do not cost.

HAPPY NEW YEAR

Friday, 23 December 2011

Thursday, 15 December 2011

A FEW THOUGHTS ON ALCOHOL

That there is a serious health problem with excessive alcohol drinking is well known and accepted and the authorities are seeking a solution.
I read and there does seem some truth in it that in the colder Northern parts of Europe alcoholism is more of a problem than in the warmer South. Whether this is genetic, environmental or social is arguable, or a combination of all three, but I do believe there is at least a genetic component as evidenced by my own family history. Several solutions have been put forward usually involving increasing the price of alcohol. Doctors in particular favour this tactic saying that an increase in the price and thus affordability would decrease consumption but then doctors can themselves afford to pay more.
Now if price were the main driver of consumption, alcohol problems would be greater in more wealthy people but the contrary is the case. Poorer people have more alcoholic problems than richer people.
So what to do?
I do not think an across the board price increase will make a discernable difference and will penalise poorer people who just want a cheap social drink and do not drink to excess. It is unjust and easy for affluent doctors to advocate as they would be unaffected by any rise.
Government advice on safe limits is a waste of time and encourages ridicule.
The question must be asked "why has the problem increased so much in recent years"? before a logical answer can be given.
I believe it is the increase of strong lagers, ciders and alcopops sold in supermarkets which encourage young people to drink to excess and not for the flavour of the drink. They drink to get drunk and not for the social pleasure or the taste of the drink. Much alcohol is consumed in city centre clubs where apart from "Happy hours" the drinks are extortionately dear. In addition drugs are often bought and taken at the same time, hardly a cheap option.
Alcoholics like other addicts will drink whatever the price and it is unjust that moderate social drinkers should be penalised with higher prices because of other's stupidity.
If drink becomes to dear people will again brew their own as Gorbachev found out in Russia.
Admittedly if there were no alcohol there would be fewer cases of liver damage but life devoid of this social lubricant would be much poorer. It is the abuse that is the trouble and the present seeming social acceptibility which is at fault.
Traditional pubs selling weaker better flavoured beer and other drinks should be encouraged through tax breaks and supermarkets selling high strength tasteless drinks taxed more heavily.
Advertising should also be curtailed.
This would achieve the preservation of our pubs, make our city centres safer and improve the health of the young people who have become to believe it is "cool" to be drunk.
Let the moderate social drinkers have their pleasure but penalise those whose excess causes trouble.
Must go and have my afternoon tipple now. A price rise will not deter me.
CHEERS.

HOW OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING MIS-EDUCATED

Listen to these 3 recorded interviews.
This is absolutely disgraceful.
Well done to the Parent for recording this and put it online.







Disgraceful, no wonder we have high rates of Indigenous youth unemployment but even HIGHER RATES OF IMMIGRANT IN EMPLOYMENT.
WE dumb our kids down in Britains schools whilst those who are educated in Foreign schools are better educate and therefore more sought after in the job market, who wants to employ ILLITERATE and INNUMERATE kids?

Tuesday, 13 December 2011

AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT - 3D STREET ART

EMMA WEST - POLITICAL PRISONER - GRANTED BAIL

Emma West, the suspected tram racist, has been granted bail.

The decision was reached at a Croydon Crown Court hearing behind closed doors this morning.

Miss West is charged with a racially-aggravated public order offence after a video showing a woman abusing passengers on a Croydon tram was posted online on November 27.

The 34-year-old, from New Addington, had initially been denied bail at Croydon Magistrates' Court on December 6 and faced the prospect of spending Christmas behind bars.

She is due to appear at Croydon Magistrates' Court on January 3 for a committal hearing.

----------------------------------

Could this be due to the pressure placed on the authorities form the Nationalist community ?

I's like to think so, and I have to give credit where it's due, Britain First were at the forefront of the fight against this POLITICAL ARREST and to Free Emma West.

This is not the end of the matter though and we must stay with the fight and not walk away thinking we have accomplished what we set out to do as she could still be imprisoned at her next court appearance.

Well done to all involved, maybe we have more clout than we think.


Sunday, 11 December 2011

FOREIGNERS ATTACK CAROL SINGERS FOR CANCER CHARITY DUE TO CONGO ELECTION OUTCOME

Carol singers raising money for a cancer charity in Trafalgar Square were attacked by protesters during a night of disorder that saw 139 arrests.

Shops were attacked, passers-by threatened and car windows smashed during a demonstration in central London against the election result in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The carol concert was raising money for MacMillan Cancer Support. It was organised by a group of friends whose loved ones had been treated for cancer.

Masked teenage boys ‘stormed’ the singers, throwing bottles of water and hot drinks into the crowd. A woman in her 40s, said to be undergoing treatment for breast cancer, was pulled to the ground. A youth attempted to set light to the Christmas tree, an annual gift from the city of Oslo since 1947, one witness said.

“They were determined not to let us sing and have fun and utterly ruined the atmosphere. Have your protest and make your point, but why did you have to ruin a lovely occasion with your scuminess,” Mark Horton, a conductor of the choir, wrote in a message online. The concert was cut short amid safety concerns.

The attack was ‘egged on’ by teenage girls who screamed and shouted “like that of the possessed”, another witness said.

Police made 110 arrests for affray as fights broke out between demonstrators.

Other arrests were made for assaulting police officers, obstructing police and blocking a public highway. Police held demonstrators inside double decker buses before ferrying them to custody.

The demonstration began as an agreed ‘static’ protest in Whitehall on Saturday evening against the re-election of President Joseph Kabila, which international observers say “lacks credibility”.

The vast central African country has immense mineral wealth but has been ravaged by civil war, corruption and economic mismanagement. Protestors accuse Western governments of propping up the regime.

On Thursday a group of 200 Congo demonstrators forced the evacuation of Oxford Circus tube station, central London, after they set off a passenger alarm on an underground train.

--------------------------

OH THE JOYS OF DIVERSITY, AREN'T WE BLESSED WITH SOME OF THE WORST FOREIGN SCUM OF THE EARTH LIVING AMONGST US !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8949752/Charity-carol-concert-attacked-by-Congo-protesters.html

Saturday, 10 December 2011

HAS NICK LOST HIS MARBLES?

Has Nick Griffin completely lost his marbles?
Earlier this week he reported on the official website that the Russian elections were better run and fairer than ours.
Today hundreds of thousands of Russian people have been demonstrating against the unfairness in those elections.
Somebody must be wrong. It seems Nick is either gullible or is at ease with a system of a ruthless leader who will bend any rule to secure his continued power.
I accept that election practice in our country is flawed and corrupt especially in heavily ethnic areas aided by the postal voting system brought in by Labour in order to secure their re election.
As Nick rightly says, the media are uniformly against nationalist parties and use subterfuge to hinder and attempt to silence us.
But Putin has done the same.
Opposition media outlets have been silenced and their leaders arrested and positions of power given to Putin cronies, but after these elections declared fair and well run by Nick there have been protests.
There have been allegations that the results did not reflect the actual votes and some of the protests have we are told been because Putin after having installed a puppet Prime Minister Medeved decided he himself would be the president for another term. All opposition has been suppressed to ensure Putin's continued control.
because of the suppression of all opposition in the media in Russia as here the opposition has used the internet to spread their message and used it to good effect. Perhaps there are lessons for us here in this respect.
But does something sound familiar in all this? A leader, popular at first seeking to continue his position of power by undemocratic means. I don't suppose Putin had proxy votes but as the supreme leader of Russia he did not need them but his tactics for retaining power are little different than Griffin's.
Now I did like Putin. He has been a good nationalist leader, just as I liked Nick Griffin but this determination to cling on to power leaves a nasty taste just as Nick Griffin's similar actions do.
Both are undemocratic, even though they are both supposedlyn patriots.
The difference is that Nick Griffin's lies and cheating have not been countered by demonstrations as he has led the BNP into insignificance and terminal decline.
Why?
Because nobody cares. He has by his actions emasculated for now the nationalist cause (we will rise again under a new CLEAN united leader).
Good luck to the Russian demonstrators who risk a dank jail in their fight for a democratic voice, but shame on Nick Griffin for his endorsement of this corrupt election.
HE HAS MADE HIMSELF A FOOL AND GIVEN OUR OPPONENTS ANOTHER STICK WITH WHICH TO ATTACK US.
HE IS A POLITICAL INCOMPETENT AND THE SOONER HE GOES THE BETTER FOR THE NATIONALIST CAUSE.

Friday, 9 December 2011

SOME PRAISE FOR CAMERON

Much as I dislike Cameron I have to admit he did the right thing last night in not caveing in to the demands of the Euro countries dominated by Sarkozy and Merkel.
It means that he has protected an important part of our economy, the City of London which will help our future problems.
BUT Why has he stood his ground on this issue and this issue alone?
Why is banking so much more important than manufacturing industry to Cameron?
Simples. Because the bankers of the City of London finance the Tory Party and all Cameron's Eton friends "work" in the City.
I accept in the present situation the London Banking business is of great importance to our country, but so were other industries which were allowed to wither on the vine, indeed were in some cases sold off to foreign owners while Cameron's friends made their cut in the City.
I am pleased that we are somewhat separate from Europe because of Cameron's stance but it should not end there.
There are many rules eminating from the EU which are not covered by his decision and which surely need to be taken back to British sovereignty.
The people voted for a "Common Market" not rule by Europe.
It is said that we will have to re negotiate these rules which we did not vote for.
NO
It is quite simple. We should take our democratic rights back unilaterally. Europe needs us more than we need them. We have a balance of trade deficit with Europe and if they imposed sanctions we could boycott their goods.
We are the customers and they must consider us. We have the clout.
But the main reason is that the Euro is a failed concept and will collapse soon so we are better out of it.
We should have the referendum Cameron promised.
Why will he not give it to us?
If he believes in democracy we should have it, but he won't give it to us because he knows the people want out.
He thinks he knows better than the people.
He may do but I doubt it.
Maybe we will make mistakes but they will be our mistakes and we will succeed or fail by them.
BUT IT WILL BE OUR CHOICE.
THAT IS WHAT DEMOCRACY IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT, ISN'T IT?
AND LET THE EURO SINK WITH THE TITANIC, WHILE WE REMAIN IN THE LIFEBOATS.

Thursday, 8 December 2011

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

A REAL RACIST ATTACK ---- FREE EMMA WEST - POLITICAL PRISONER - NOW




"Four Muslim women who kicked the hell out of a woman whilst screaming “kill the white slag” have walked free from court — apparently because they were drunk, and because their religion does not allow alcohol they were not used to the effects."

This is British justice.

Violent assault, child porn, rape, whole hosts of other crimes, you'll get bail.

Offend a few people on a train and you'll end up remanded in custody - for your own protection of course.

Curious that those accused of assaulting and raping that poor baby recently didn't get remanded 'for their own protection'. One would imagine many people might feel moved to take matters into their own hands over that.

----------------------------------------------
Remember this when our turn comes to PUNISH THE TRAITORS.
SHOW THEM NO MERCY.

Let's show Emma West that she is not alone and not forgotten, send her as many xmas cards as we can in her support.

PLEASE SHOW YOUR SUPPORT FOR AN INDIGENOUS ENGLISHWOMAN WHO IS BEING PERSECUTED BY THE TRAITORS.

Emma West
C/O HMP Bronzefield
Woodthorpe Road
Ashford
Middlesex
TW15 3JZ

A TALE OF TWO DAUGHTERS

I have two daughters, one working in the private sector and one in the public sector as a teacher.
The eldest, the teacher is good at her job I'm told but has the usual long holidays, job security and a good pension.
She was on strike today over pension entitlements even though she voted against striking, the school was closed.
The younger daughter works in private industry and although she has a good job it is not as well paid as her older sister.
She has been made redundant three times and now works for a German firm and if she is absent from work too much would be sacked. In the snow last year she walked 5 miles to work while the teacher daughter stayed at home because the school was closed, but got no thanks for it. In spite of her hard work her job is not secure especially in a financial downturn.
In other words one daughter has little job security, poor holiday entitlement and the prospect of a lower pension than the one who is a teacher. She also has to pay in her taxes to subsidise the teacher daughter (25% of council taxes go to pay for public service pensions) even though she is paid less than the teacher.
She also had to make arrangements for her children owing to the strike.
I have to admit the daughter who is a teacher is very against the strike but as the school is closed is obliged to be off.
The strikers are hitting people with poorer work and pension conditions than they have themselves in itself unfair.
So why the public sector strikes?
Because the workers in that sector will have to pay more than formerly agreed for their index linked pensions and work longer before they receive them. It is a worse deal than they had before and I can understand that they do not like this, but those pensions are heavily subsidised by the state, in other words NOW they get much more than they paid in.
I am all for a decent standard of living for pensioners but these public pensions are unaffordable and this largess of public money can not go on.I know the workers contribute a great deal of money to them but they get back far more.
The fact is there is not enough money to pay for the public service pensions, so whatever the unions say eventually when the money really does run out and the government can borrow no more the promise to pay these index linked pensions will be renaged on.
The whole pension system private and public is a giant Ponzi scheme. Pensions paid out now are paid out of present contributions.
Many people think that when they contribute to these schemes there is a big "pot of gold" waiting for them when they retire. There is no such pot. The money is not there but this fact has been disguised until now.
The workers in the public service are in effect paying a tax to the Chancellor to subsidise present pensions and for anybody younger than fifty there is no hope of a return on their money. Their contributions do not go in to their pension pots.
Private pension schemes are as bad with the pension advisors making more money out of contributions than the owners of those schemes, sometimes as much as 30%.
It supports a big industry in the City of London and is just a big con.
I believe young people should save themselves for their pensions with the money they would have otherwise paid into these schemes.
I realise that older public sector people such as me have benefitted by these schemes in the past but the glory days of big pensions are over and there is no hope of them continuing.
However the government should talk to the unions and lead by example.
We are all in it together they say.
Well they should take a pension cut as should anybody receiving a high public sector pension, judges, headmasters, senior policemen and doctors etc as the present system can not carry on.
I realise that there are many other things the government should do to curb expenditure, bankers bonuses, foreign aid etc but these are other matters.
The fact is
THE PRESENT SCHEME IS UNAFFORDABLE and striking will not improve matters.
Far better to opt out and save yourself rather than subsidising the exchequer or private funds.
The country is broke and you will never get your money back.

Saturday, 3 December 2011

CHINA WILL NOT HESITATE TO PROTECT IRAN EVEN IF IT MEANS WW111

CHINESE NEWS REPORT WITH ENGLISH SUBTITLES.

yaz