Friday 16 July 2010

FRIDAY PRAYERS - ISLAMIST RACISTS AND CHILD BRIDES IN LANCASHIRE

Accrington forced marriage row pair locked up

TWO of three men involved in a confrontation with police and a social worker after a schoolgirl complained she might be being lined up for a forced marriage are behind bars.

Burnley Crown Court heard police were abused and ended up calling for back-up at a house in Accrington.

The social worker, who was threatened with death and racially insulted, said it was the worst incident she had ever had to suffer in her job.

Khalid Hussain, 24, of Ormerod Street, Accrington and Majid Hussain, 23, of Great Townley Street, Preston, admitted using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour.

Mohammed Liaqat, 19, also of Ormerod Street, Accrington, pleaded guilty to causing racially aggravated fear of violence.

Khalid Hussain, who was sent to jail for two years in April for another offence, was said by Judge Andrew Woolman to be ‘proving a trouble to the community’.

He and Liaqat were given four months in custody each.

Majid Hussain got four months in prison, suspended for two years with 120 hours’ unpaid work.

Sergey Prokofiev, prosecuting, said last August the girl was removed from her home and two police officers and the social worker went to speak to her relations.

Initial discussions seemed quite amicable but Liaqat claimed the girl was being held against her will and demanded she be returned to her family home.

Majid Hussain was vociferous in stating she had been in contact with her relations.

Mr Prokofiev said Hussain and Liaqat went towards the officers shouting abuse and they and the social worker got up to leave.

Khalid Hussain ran into the room with a mobile phone, insisting the officers see what was on the phone and was rude and aggressive.

The prosecutor said Liaqat approached the social worker’s vehicle, and said to her: ‘I am going to kill you.' He then made a cut throat motion.

Majid Hussain said the family was fed up because officers were not listening to them when they claimed the girl had been in touch.

FRIDAY PRAYERS - ISLAM - THE RELIGION OF PAEDOPHILES

A PERVERT was trapped in an online sting — when a journalist posed as a 13-year-old girl in a chat room, a court heard.

Sameer Jusab, aged 30, encouraged the person he thought was a teenage girl called Kareen to perform sex acts.

Jusab only escaped jail because the girl was not real and he resisted requests from the “girl” for them to meet.

Bolton Crown Court heard a newspaper reporter set up an internet chat room called “No Adults” and created a fake profile — KareenR12.

Jusab, of Litherland Road, Bolton, joined the site the same day and sent the girl an instant message asking her name and age and asked her to send a photograph.

Jusab, who claimed he was only 20, spoke of wanting to perform a sex act on the 13-year-old, the court heard.

He asked her to send him naked pictures and he also encouraged her to perform a sex act on herself.

He sent two video clips of a couple performing a sexual act.

Jusab, described in court as shy and introverted, even asked the girl to send him her underwear in the post.

The court heard the journalist had emailed Jusab several times asking for them to meet up, but he had ignored these requests.

Judge Steven Everett said: “To any reasonable person, these acts would be regarded as disgusting and unacceptable.”

Jusab pleaded guilty to inciting a child to engage in a sexual activity on the basis that he never intended to meet up with the child.

He was ordered to sign the sex offenders register for the next seven years.

He was given a five-year sexual offences prevention order.

This means he is banned from having internet access on a personal computer or mobile phone and also prevented from seeking employment in a job where he would come into contact with girls under the age of 16.

He was also given a three-year community order and must complete the Northumberland Sexual Offences Programme.


HIS ROYAL HYPOCRISY

I read yesterday that the expert Prince Charles has given a talk labelling climate change sceptics who doubt man made global warming as indulging in "pseudo science".
That is a bit rich for a "real" scientist like him who talks to his plants and believes in the much discredited homeopathy as a treatment, following the principle that the lower the dose of remedy the more powerful it becomes.
I did not realise he had a scientific training. I thought he took Art and History at the university, entrance to which was made easier to accommodate his lack of knowledge /intelligence.
I would have thought his opinions on such weighty matters as paintings or the wars his ancestors fought in and sometimes caused more appropriate.

I did have a scientific training in medicine preceeded by A levels (proper ones then) in Physics, Chemistry and Biology so I thought I would give my take on the matter, considering myself, possibly conceitedly more competent to interpret the data.
A FEW FACTS

1 The earth has become warmer since the "little Ice Age" in the middle ages. Previous to that it was warmer than now with farming in Greenland and grapes growing by Hadrian's Wall.

2 Sea levels do seem to be rising. However this rise is more marked in the Sout East than elswhere such as the North West of Scotland, where it appears to be falling. In fact much of the difference is because of the land tilting and nothing to do with sea level rises.

3 CO2 levels are rising but it is not proven that this is a cause of warming temperatures. Also our contribution to global CO2 levels is 2% so any measuers we take will have a negligable effect especially when China and India are increasing their CO2 output.

4 There are more icebergs forming off Greenland as the warmer temperatures increase sea evaporation in the tropics and snowfall at the poles and the Earth has a self regulating mechanism.

These are the basic facts of the science. The fact that bees are declining is because of a mite and nothing to do with rising temperatures.

The greatest danger to humanity is oil shortage as without oil the present world population can not be sustained. Oil is harder to get as is shown by the BP accident in the Gulf of Mexico.
With our rapidly growing population and increasing oil shortages starvation beckons in Britain, a far greater danger than a few inches of sea level rise.

The reason this agenda is being pushed is the huge amounts of money being made by the carbon trading scam. This fraud does not reduce the CO2 at all but the traders in these pieces of paper make £millions and we already pay for this in taxes on electricity and dearer British goods.
It just enables it to be produced at a subsidised rate in places such as China while our industries are penalised. It produces just as much CO2 to produce a car or television in China as it does here. It's just produced in a different place.

The irony of all this is that those who promote this "science" are usually those with the biggest carbon footprint, Al Gore and His Royal Highness. Private planes fly them round the world to discourage people from flying while their houses and cars consume massive amounts of energy.

Yes conservation of all things is good, landscape, raw materials and fuel but trading pieces of paper round the world will do nothing but ruin our country.
Together with the other things the State does that seems the intent.

I would suggest His Royal Highness sticks to his overpriced organic biscuits. That way he will harm nothing but the pockets of those foolish enough to buy them.
So Charlie less hypocrisy please

yaz