HOMOSEXUALS AND CHILDREN

Homosexuals (and liberals) always vehemently deny that “gays” and lesbians are more likely to sexually abuse children than heterosexuals. In fact, for many, especially in the mainstream media, this is a topic whose name they dare not speak.

In this age of “equality” when homosexuals are “entitled” to adopt and foster children every bit as much as normal married couples, you would imagine that the issue has been thoroughly researched in order to protect children as much as possible.

You would dearly hope so.

But what is the truth? Are homosexuals more likely to abuse children than heterosexuals? Was the government right to force adoption agencies that refused to go along with this new agenda to close their doors or are all animals not equal when it comes to caring for children?

I was inspired to write this post after seeing the adverts on the Pink News website. The main ad banner on the mast head was for Southwark Council who are recruiting people to work with children, adolescents and families. I doubt they would dare advertise on a website dedicated to promoting heterosexuality.

Further down is an ad for the charity Plan, looking for people to sponsor children. The advert beside this one declares, “You can be a queer candy”. I didn’t click on that one.

It has left me wondering if the companies who placed these adverts believe that homosexuals have more of an “interest” in children and so their clients will get better results.

(There was also an ad for a course from Middlesex University: “Do you want to change the face of TV so it reflects the diverse world you live in and the people you know?…We are keen to hear from applications with no or limited experience of the media industry. Applications are encouraged from those with a diverse background or a strong understanding of diversity.”)

Anyway, I have tried Googling for definitive information on the subject of whether homosexuals are more likely to sexually abuse children, but the information seems hard to find.

When talking about the Catholic Church’s paedophile scandal, Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican’s permanent observer to the UN, blamed homosexuals in the priesthood,

Of all priests involved in the abuses, 80 to 90 per cent belong to this sexual orientation minority which is sexually engaged with adolescent boys between the ages of 11 and 17.

Tomasi added that it would be “more correct” to refer to ephebophilia, a homosexual attraction to adolescent males, than paedophilia.

Father John Owen, the communications officer for the archdiocese of Cardiff and also a chaplain at Cardiff University, told the BBC that,

most of the offences are being committed by homosexuals and said that teenage boys were the group affected by the “majority” of abuse cases in the United Kingdom, adding: “Now what does that tell you? Now that is a fact.”

The Catholic League’s Bill Donohue reported in a recent Washington Post opinion piece about the origins of the Catholic Church’s child molestation scandals,

More recently, in organs such as the Archives of Sexual Behavior, the Journal of Sex Research, the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy and Pediatrics, it has been established that homosexuals are disproportionately represented among child molesters.

Dr Richard Fitzgibbons, a psychiatrist who has worked with abusive clergy, says,

Every priest whom I treated who was involved with children sexually had previously been involved in adult homosexual relationships.

That Washington Post piece says,

Alfred Kinsey was the first to identify a correlation between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of minors. In 1948, he found that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old.

Kinsey is the originator of the famous and fraudulent claim (and one which is still, unfortunately, quoted) that ten percent of the population is homosexual (it is more like 1 – 2%), so I do not imagine he was trying to do any favours here. The true figure could sadly be higher still.

Here is some evidence, at least, that homosexuals are more likely to abuse children. With regard to “gay adoption,” whether sexual abuse takes place or not, many people feel that it is child abuse in itself. Henry Makow writes,

If I were a lawyer, I’d make a specialty of suing the nine Canadian provinces and 15 States that allow same-sex adoption. My clients would be young adults whose lives were destroyed because these jurisdictions ignored their innate heterosexuality. I would wager that this arrogant flouting of nature will cost hundreds of millions in restitution.

Google “coming out” and compare the resources available to young would-be homosexuals with the callous indifference to innocent heterosexual children who don’t have necessary heterosexual role models at home and don’t know what’s wrong.

And he cites the real reason for engineering this “equality”,

This stealth war on heterosexuals (disguised as woman’s and gay rights) is designed to destabilize society in advance of the New World Order. The destruction of the nuclear family has long been the Illuminati Communist goal. They wish to make arrested development (homosexuality) the new norm. Lesbianism is the hidden agenda of feminism. Marriage and family are essential to our natural development. But, despite the deceitful propaganda, most male homosexuals don’t want marriage or children. They want sex.

See this 1969 document from Rockefeller-funded “Planned Parenthood” which plots to promote homosexuality and feminism so as to decrease US fertility. (Berelson-Jaffe Chart)

Because promoting homosexuality is the elite Agenda, the research on same-sex parenting is highly politicized. Thus, we have numerous nonsensical claims that homosexual parenting is as good for the child or better than a stable heterosexual marriage. Here is a study that actually claims that more than half of gay men want to have children! It says that in 2007, an estimated two million GLB people were interested in adopting. An estimated 65,500 adopted children were living with a lesbian or gay parent. More than 16,000 adopted children are living with lesbian and gay parents in California, the highest number among the states. Gay and lesbian parents are raising four percent of all adopted children in the United States.

I’m not saying that none of these parents have merit. I am saying that it is wrong to place heterosexual children with homosexual parents.

Society is in the grip of a long-term satanic conspiracy masquerading as “progressive” which is attempting to concentrate all wealth in the hands of the central bankers and their allies. They are re-engineering the human race to serve them in a neo feudal world order.

This is the real “hate” and we won’t be fooled or coerced.

nicked from here

Morg
.

Gaddafi demands £4 billion from EU or Europe will turn 'black'

During an EU-Africa summit, that ended on Tuesday in Tripoli, the Libyan leader described European's economic relationship with the African continent as a "failure".

Unless "Christian, white" countries gave him extra funding, Colonel Gaddafi predicted that Europe would be flooded with illegal immigrants leaving impoverished Africa.

"We should stop this illegal immigration. If we don't, Europe will become black, it will be overcome by people with different religions, it will change," he said.

Read the rest here -

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8170956/Gaddafi-demands-4-billion-from-EU-or-Europe-will-turn-black.html

DURKA DURKA MOHAMMED JIHAD

TEAM AMERICA - EXCELLENT FILM.

Coalition should be even tougher on immigration, says poll

Taken from todays Telegraph -

The majority of the public backed the Government's pledge to bring net migration down to the tens of thousands but believe it should go even further, according to the study for the think-tank Migrationwatch.

A cap on migrant workers will limit the number of foreign staff arriving in the UK to 21,700 a year and a review of student visas is expected to cut those numbers by the tens of thousands.

The aim is to bring net migration, the difference between those arriving and those leaving, from around 200,000 to the "tens of thousands".

The latest poll found 81 per cent were in favour of such a move, including 79 per cent of Liberal Democrat voters who were asked.

However, seven in ten people thought the numbers should be at the most 50,000 or lower.

The poll also revealed almost three quarters of the public are concerned over recent reports that white Britons could be in a minority by 2066.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch, said, "These results are a strong vote of confidence in the government’s recent measures to control economic migration.

"But they are also warning that the public, who would like to see even lower levels of immigration, are very unhappy about the long-term consequences of immigration for the make-up of our society.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/8168259/Coalition-should-be-even-tougher-on-immigration-says-poll.html

Migration Watch report -

Changing Primary Schools in England: 1998 - 2010

1. This paper examines the impact that immigration, much of it from non English speaking countries, has had on our primary schools in the period 1998 to 2010.

2. It examines England as a whole, individual regions, and three groups of Local Education Authorities (LEAs) - London Boroughs, the largest urban boroughs outside London, and the remaining LEAs in England. It also projects the numbers to 2018.

3. The following are the main findings:

a) In total, between 1991 and 2008, there was a net increase of over 2.5 million in long-term immigrants arriving in the UK from non English speaking countries, mostly to settle. There was a net inflow of 2 million of them between 1998 and 2008.

b) The effect has been intensified by the rapid increase in the number of foreign born women of reproductive age. In 2007 this total was nearly 43% higher than in 2001. In contrast, the number of UK born woman of reproductive age was nearly 3% lower in the same period.

c) In the period 1994 to 2009 the proportion of births to foreign born women rose from 14% to 25%.

d) In the period 1998 to 2010, the proportion of children in primary schools in England for whom English was not the mother tongue nearly doubled to 16%, or over half a million out of 3.2 million children.

e) In inner London in 2010 55% of all primary school pupils did not have English as their first language.

f) In outer London the proportion of pupils without English as a mother tongue almost doubled from 22% to 39%.

g) In six out of the nine regions and in England as a whole, the percentage of children without English as a mother tongue almost doubled from 8.5% to 16%.

h) Our projection suggests that the percentage of primary school children in England without English as a mother tongue will increase to 22.7% in 2018, or almost 830,000 - a 60% increase on current numbers.

Introduction

4. Net immigration into the UK from overseas increased very significantly with the election of the Labour Government in May 1997. In the seven years from 1991 to 1997, it averaged around 41,000 each year; thereafter, in the eleven years to 2008 it averaged around 180,000.

5. Most of this net immigration came from countries where the predominant language is other than English – the European Union (excluding the Irish Republic), ‘New Commonwealth’ countries in Africa and Asia, and other countries outside Europe with few historical or cultural links to the UK – for example, the Democratic Republic of Congo. In the seven years from 1991 to 1997 such net immigration averaged almost 60,000 each year, but in 1998 and thereafter it increased over threefold, averaging almost 200,000 each year to 2008. In total, between 1991 and 2008, there was a net increase of over 2.5 million long term immigrants from non – English speaking countries arriving in the UK, mostly to settle. Figure 1 below shows the approximate trend of net migration from Non-English Speaking Countries between 1991 and 2008.

Read the rest here -

http://www.migrationwatchuk.com/briefingPaper/document/210

VICTORIAN BRITAIN

For those of us who see politics as the only way of change, and if you missed this last night like I did I suggest you click on the link to the BBCi webplayer.
As someone who studied Mid-Victorian Britain with the OU (Open University) this sort of documentary fascinates me.
I hope it does the same for you.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00wh73v/Ian_Hislops_Age_of_the_DoGooders_Britains_Moral_Makeover/

Ps.
I am at a loss for why the BBC have made a programme which is dominated by an HISTORICAL Mono-Culture, which Victorian Britain was, and like all the other eras of Britain before was not and would never consider a Multi-Cultural Britain.
The only thing I can think of is it is trying to restore some Morals into OUR Britain today ?

We can take comfort from this programme in that it shows that WE CAN make a difference.

Our VOICE OF FREEDOM should be to POLITICS TODAY what the LANCET was to VICTORIAN SURGERY and todays Medical proffesion.
Todays POLITICS and POLITICIANS should be as much under scrutiny as the HEALTH PROFFESIONALS were in VICTORIAN BRITAIN.

Look to the past for the reformation of OUR FUTURE. Learn from the past.

Watch carefully, maybe you can see similar problems today that were in evidence then.

Though the Civil Service today are against NATIONALISM (blame the COMMUNIST/MARXIST UNIONS), through those who see NATIONALISTS as an enemy to the COMMUNISM/MARXISM which is rife in todays CIVIL SERVICE, even though the CIVIL SERVICE CODE dictates that they SHOULD be above POLITICS.

Today in Britain, our Victorian past is more than evident as we now have an underclass such as their was in VICTRIAN BRITAIN.
Or Politicians are in it for themselves and not for US.
Should we change it ?
The Victorians did.

I'm up for it..are YOU ?

Are you willing to ask the questions that need to be asked ?
If you are please use the following message, you may edit it as you wish, as certain emails with the exat same message can be classed as JUNK MAIL.

Please use the following message as your template -

The Cost of Equality & Diversity

It has come to my notice that YOUR COUNCIL District Council has a section totally devoted to the promotion of equality and diversity. I don’t understand why we need people employed in such an activity, as it certainly has no relevance for the people of YOUR TOWN and serves no useful purpose.

Folk generally feel that Equality & Diversity means the promotion of alien cultures and religions, at the expense of the demeaning and belittling of all indigenous British values and traditions. It is also believed that positive discrimination, or affirmative action, is used to promote ethnic minorities into positions within local government at the expense of superior qualified indigenous Britons – in particular white heterosexual indigenous males. Whether or not these concerns are true or false, there can be no doubt that the promotion of Equality & Diversity does nothing to improve relations between different cultures; in fact imposing it on the indigenous population can only aggravate the situation. The Anglo-Celtic peoples of these islands should not have to change their culture, traditions and values to appease immigrants - it is the duty of the immigrant to abide by the mores and practices of the British people. If immigrants don’t like it, then they should be encouraged to leave the UK!

We are living in a time of austerity where every person and organization has to reduce their spending, including YOUR COUNCIL District Council - and to most folk’s way of thinking Equality & Diversity is an unnecessary burden imposed on an already impoverished Council Tax payer.

As a Consequence of my concerns, I would be pleased if you can provide me with the following information under the terms and rights allowed under the Freedom of Information Act:

1. Details of all personnel employed by YOUR COUNCIL District Council associated with Equality & Diversity including:

• Job Title

• A brief description of their duties

• Their annual salary

2. The total costs to the local Council Tax payer for implementing Equality & Diversity practices within YOUR COUNCIL District Council over the past year.

3. A brief description of tasks undertaken with regards to Equality & Diversity by YOUR COUNCIL District Council over the past year.

I look forward to receiving your answers within the twenty working days stipulated by the Act.

Yours Sincerely,

YOUR NAME -

Please use the LINK below to find your MP -

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/

Hat tip to http://southwestnationalists.blogspot.com/