FREE AND FAIR VOTE RIGGED ELECTIONS 4

THIRD WORLD ELECTION FRAUD PRACTICES FACILITATED BY NEW LABOUR AND IT'S TAKE OVER OF LONDON BY MILITANT MOHAMMEDANS.

"At the European elections, less than a year ago, the electoral roll of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets contained 148,970 names. By January this year, it had shot up to 160,278. And in the past month alone, a further 5,000 new names have mysteriously appeared on the voting lists.

There are only two possibilities here. Either Tower Hamlets is growing twice as fast as the fastest-growing city in China, or it is the target of massive and systematic electoral fraud. We can have a guess at the answer from the fact that some three-bedroom flats in the borough appear to have 12 adults on the roll. The real occupants, when approached on the doorstep, have never heard of their 10 new flatmates.

Elections in Tower Hamlets have always been a scandal. In 2006, an entire tower block had its postal votes stolen. But this time it's more serious. In a close election, Tower Hamlets – and other places like it – could help tip the balance of power. And there are now rather too many other places like it, with dozens of police inquiries under way in inner-city seats across the country. At the time of writing, I don't know how Britain has voted. But under some scenarios, the real and frightening possibility is that this election was decided by fraud.

There are local factors, too. As the Telegraph has documented, the Islamic Forum of Europe, a radical Islamist group based at the hardline East London Mosque, has been accused of secretly infiltrating the Tower Hamlets Labour Party – and is seeking to consolidate its control by having the borough run by a directly elected mayor. A referendum on the mayoral proposal was also held yesterday.

I have no evidence that the IFE is behind the fraud in Tower Hamlets. But its favoured candidates have done remarkably well lately. At the last London mayoral election, Ken Livingstone, for whom leading members of the IFE vigorously campaigned, saw his share of the vote in one ward rise from 29.6 per cent to a rather improbable 68.1 per cent.

The problem is simple. Panicked by falling turnout, Labour allowed postal voting on demand. But a postal vote is a thousand times easier to rig than a vote cast in person. At a polling station, you need a different body for each fake voter. With a postal vote, all you need is a different envelope, and perhaps not even that.

Non-existent electors are only the half of it. By all but abolishing the secrecy of the ballot, postal voting opens the door to threats, pressure and outright vote-buying. If you vote in a polling station, nobody can make you show them your ballot paper. Nobody can know if you've obeyed orders or not.

Worst of all, though, is that the authorities don't seem to care. Police inquiries seldom get anywhere. After the 2006 scandals, one minister said that allegations of electoral fraud risked "undermining confidence". In the most dishonest press release I have ever seen, the Islamist-influenced Tower Hamlets council claimed that an election tribunal had found "no evidence of electoral fraud in Tower Hamlets". Actually, the judge ruled that there was "clear, prima facie evidence" for it.

Our rulers have tiptoed round this subject because voting fraud is mostly a problem – for now – in Asian areas. But what they're actually saying, if you think about it, is that it's all right for Asians to have their votes stolen – not a view that most Asian voters would share.

To avoid "undermining confidence" in democracy itself, we need change. For future elections, postal voting on demand should be suspended in Tower Hamlets, in Birmingham, in the Northern mill towns and anywhere else where problems arise. Nobody in these places is more than a short walk from a polling station. If we do not act, we are effectively in league with the
vote-stealers."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7687416/By-permitting-fraud-we-betray-democracy.html

DO YOU REALLY THINK New Labour WON THE LOCAL ELECTION IN WIGAN ON THE STRENGTH OF A LEGITIMATE VOTE ?

Postal vote fraud: 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid fears bogus voters could swing election

Voter fraud could determine the outcome of the general election as evidence emerges of massive postal vote rigging.

Police have launched 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid widespread cases of electoral rolls being packed with ‘bogus’ voters.

Officials report a flood of postal vote applications in marginal seats. With the outcome of the closest election in a generation hanging in the balance, a few thousand ‘stolen’ votes there could determine who wins the keys to Downing Street.

"‘We are facing a situation where we can no longer trust the integrity of our electoral system. It was a huge mistake to extend the postal vote. It opened up our system to all kinds of frauds." Martin Bell.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1271457/General-Election-2010-Postal-vote-fraud-amid-fears-bogus-voters-swing-election.html

Arrest after alleged voting fraud in Peterborough

A Conservative activist in Peterborough has been arrested after alleged incidents of postal voting fraud.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/england/8662814.stm

Click on text to view original News sources.

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

We speak and behave as if we are the only people in Europe who has problems with the Human Rights Act. We also speak and act as if we are the only country in Europe that has problems with the E.U. In fact, all individual European countries have E.U. etc. related problems. We only talk about the problems we have, so we tend to think it's always us against 26 other countries. Other countries talk and behave the same way - they each only discuss their own problems, and so tend to think it is THEIR country against 26 others (and in those cases we are one of the 26 ... if you see what I mean). See how the E.U. institutions have all the European countries divided up on the "Divide and Rule" principle? It really does work, but only where a compliant media is with the E.U. right across Europe. Contrary to popular opinion, the media DOES discuss problems (occasionally) relating to the idea of a united Europe, but they are very careful to discuss those problems in ways that makes it seem as if the rest of Europe is united on something, and that it's WE who are the awkward sods. The media in all E.U. countries does this - speak as if only THEIR country is the one with problems.

Take the Human Rights Act - given the current furore about the Paki terrorists recently released without even supervision, and not even deported because some silly bugger in a wig says it will violate their "human rights" if they are deported. Makes it sound as if only WE have problems over this Act. Not so! Have you read about this problem with the Human Rights Act that they have in Germany in any of your newspapers? Or heard it discussed on the lobotomy box?

Have a read - two pages of discussion on a German problem over it that you wont read or hear about in anything other than the German media. See how the "divide and rule" principle works? Click the blue for the article.

Read how countries tie themselves up in knots adjusting their domestic legislation in order for it to comply with E.U. legislation. We do it too - indeed, all 27 E.U members do it without ever getting together and discussing how the E.U. legislation itself can be adjusted to save all that individual-nation trouble - the same trouble everyone else has too. And maybe just do the job once, instead of doing the same job 27 times. But that would be far too sensible wouldn't it ... and the E.U. doesn't work like that. "Sensible" is not a concept on the E.U.'s radar screen.

So no great discussion about this Act in the E.U. parliament because everyone thinks that it's only THEIR country that has a problem, and no one wants to appear to be the awkward sod who is out of line with everyone else. This happens over almost everything E.U.-related you can think of ... no one wants to think their country is being the awkward one who will ruin harmony if they speak out.

So, serious problems that all countries share in one way or another never get discussed because of this divide and rule principle. And the E.U (not the same as "Europe") just sails on without a care in the world.

Do you think we're the only country with a mass immigration problem? Or at least the only country with a COST of mass immigration problem? We talk about it as if it's only us. I'll take a look at the Dutch experience next post.

Think about it.

Morg
.