Our progress at the recent EU elections seems to have upset local "democratic councillors"
The workshop on how to combat our democratic progress scheduled to take place on council premises and thus partly paid for by our members is a travesty of democracy reminiscent of a Stalinist state.
The councillors have pledged "to work harder to understand people's concerns"
We are called a "wolf in sheep's clothing" by of all people Cllr G Wilkes who until he spit his dummy out with irrational complaints seemed a decent sort of person, and indeed had said he agreed with many of our views.
Does this sudden concern for the opinions of the people of Wigan demonstrate THE POWER OF A BNP vote?
Would they have shown such concern if we were not growing? I doubt it.
The people of Wigan can see the town built by the work and often deaths of our ancestors gradually being replaced by a multicultural society we did not vote for.
We did not vote to be at the back of the queue for housing, our schools crowded with children from a foreign culture and our hospitals treating increasing numbers of people from abroad.
Councillors, where were these proposals in your manifestos?
They weren't there. In other words you went to the voters on a false ticket.
You have no mandate for this. You are liars.
Who then is the wolf?
If by saying that we inheritors of the toil of our ancestors should have priority makes me a racist THEN I AM PROUD TO BE CALLED ONE.
I do not believe we have the right to impose our will on any other country as do those of other parties but THIS TOWN IS OURS and we are entitled to priority.
For councillors who I thought were decent people to use resources some of which were taken from BNP supporters against our democratic party I have only this to say.
YOU ARE A DISGRACE TO DEMOCRACY and our time will come!
Friday, 6 November 2009
BNP ROW ERUPTS OVER WORKSHOP
Banner headlines on the Wigantoday.net in relation to Lanky's earlier post THE FEAR OF GOD!
For those who are heading over to the Wigantoday.net and after reading the article would like to leave a comment; then please make sure you 'copy' or 'screen grab' your entry for future use as the Wigantoday.net has a prolific 'red pen deleter' and they will remove any favourable BNP comments.
Additionally, what about copying and pasting your comments to here on the Wigan Patriot Blog comment section so everyone can see them before they disappear into the abyss?
Anyone can remove a comment on the Wigantoday.net just by using the "report unsuitable" option and posting a lame reason for doing so!
p.s. Just tried to login on to the Wigantoday.net to comment on this article using my usual password etc...But, it's having none of it!
Funny thing is though.... I can comment on all the other articles but this one?? Strange but true!
For those who are heading over to the Wigantoday.net and after reading the article would like to leave a comment; then please make sure you 'copy' or 'screen grab' your entry for future use as the Wigantoday.net has a prolific 'red pen deleter' and they will remove any favourable BNP comments.
Additionally, what about copying and pasting your comments to here on the Wigan Patriot Blog comment section so everyone can see them before they disappear into the abyss?
Anyone can remove a comment on the Wigantoday.net just by using the "report unsuitable" option and posting a lame reason for doing so!
p.s. Just tried to login on to the Wigantoday.net to comment on this article using my usual password etc...But, it's having none of it!
Funny thing is though.... I can comment on all the other articles but this one?? Strange but true!
MASSACRE
We had our own little massacre in the 'stan when a moslem policeman opened up on our soldiers while they were off guard. Five dead and even more wounded.
*Before reading, bear in mind that what an American conservative calls 'liberal', we call Marxist, or Lefty, or Righteous, or Politically Correct, or do-gooders.. Well, in short, the LabLibCon party and supporters.
Now America has this:
The massacre
What shall we call the event, this mass murder of 12 and wounding of 31 other military personnel by a Muslim major and medical doctor at the nation’s largest military base? The Fort Hood Massacre? The Muslim Massacre? Hell, why not get right to the root of the issue and call it the Liberal Massacre? Because it’s liberalism that tells us that we must not exclude or discriminate against any groups or any religions, including the religion that commands its followers to destroy us; that we must be equally open to all cultures, religions, and peoples, including the people who are obligated by their god to subjugate or kill us; and that everyone must be equally honored and respected, no matter how alien and incompatible they may be.
Here’s a simple, commonsense test to help us grasp the difference between liberalism and non-liberalism. Would Charles Martel have commissioned Muslim officers in his army? Would King Jan Sobieski have allowed Muslim doctors to enter his headquarters and move about at liberty among his men on the eve of deployment for battle against Muslims? Of course not. Because Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski were not liberals. They knew that Muslims were the enemy who intended the conquest and Islamization of Europe. They knew that there was a difference between us and them.
Nidal Malik Hasan—
Army major, medical doctor,
mass murderer, Muslim But liberal society allows Muslims by the millions to immigrate into its bosom. Liberal society gives Muslims full liberty to practice their religion here. Liberal society trains Muslims in its elite institutions to be doctors and engineers. Liberal society inducts Muslim men and officers into its military. And liberal society prohibits any negative statement about Islam. And thus we arrive at the sickening but unquestioned phenomenon—one of the supreme symptoms of liberalism—that in their reactions to this massacre, officials and media uniformly use passive, de-personalized language conveying the idea of a disaster without an agent who caused the disaster:
“tragedy” (McCaffrey); “a horrific outburst of violence (Obama); “shocked and saddened … today’s outburst of violence … My heart goes out to their loved ones” (Kay Bailey Hutchison).
But how could they use other than passive, de-personalized language to describe a mass murder by an Army major and medical doctor named Malik Nadal Hasan? What are they supposed to say? That we have an enemy within, this enemy is Islam, and that we will not be safe or free until this enemy is removed from us? Since they can’t say that, being liberals, the only available language to them is the liberal language of meaningless, causeless catastrophe, and of our own helplessness to do anything about it.
And what is the alternative to such weakness, cowardice, dishonesty, and dishonor, and the suicidal danger into which they are leading us?
Truth.
I wrote in August 2006:
This is the unchangeable reality.… We will have terrorist attacks and threats of terrorists attacks and inconvenient and humiliating security measures and the disruption of ordinary activities FOREVER, as long as Muslims are in the West in any significant numbers.… The unchangeable fact is that wherever there is a sizable Muslim community there will be a very large number of terror supporters and therefore—inevitably—actual terrorists as well. This is our future, FOREVER, unless we stop Muslim immigration and initiate a steady out-migration of Muslims from the West until their remaining numbers are a small fraction of what they are now and there are no true believers among the ones that remain. Travelers from Muslim countries must be tightly restricted as well. Muslims must be essentially locked up inside the Muslim lands, with only carefully screened individuals allowed into the non-Muslim world.
The enemy are among us, in America, in Britain, in the West, and will remain so until we remove them from the West and indeed from the entire non-Muslim world. As extreme as this sounds, it is a no-brainer. There is no other solution. All other responses to this problem add up to meaningless hand-wringing. The hand-wringing will go on FOREVER, along with the terrorist attacks and the threat of terrorist attacks, until we take the ONLY STEPS that can actually and permanently end the threat.
View From The Right
America has had events like that which happened to our young men in the 'stan several times in Iraq. If you recall from the first Gulf war, the Americans had one of their (moslem) soldiers fragging a tent with several other soldiers in - and that was before the fighting started.
How can our young men and women be ordered to serve alongside armed moslems? It's fine for the politicians and generals to issue these orders - they are not the ones with an itch running right up their backs when there armed, ostensibly allied, moslems around.
I think it's about time all moslems were discharged from our armed forces. They cannot be trusted, and why should our young men be forced to take an unnecessary risk. Seems they can't even trust their doctors if they are moslem (and wasn't it moslem doctors who attacked Glasgow airport?) Their life is risky enough as it is.
Never forget: moslems have only one loyalty, and it is not to us, our country or our monarch. The liblabcon call some of them 'moderate' and some extremist. But they all read the same Book, so none can be trusted. None. Ever.
Morg
.
*Before reading, bear in mind that what an American conservative calls 'liberal', we call Marxist, or Lefty, or Righteous, or Politically Correct, or do-gooders.. Well, in short, the LabLibCon party and supporters.
Now America has this:
The massacre
What shall we call the event, this mass murder of 12 and wounding of 31 other military personnel by a Muslim major and medical doctor at the nation’s largest military base? The Fort Hood Massacre? The Muslim Massacre? Hell, why not get right to the root of the issue and call it the Liberal Massacre? Because it’s liberalism that tells us that we must not exclude or discriminate against any groups or any religions, including the religion that commands its followers to destroy us; that we must be equally open to all cultures, religions, and peoples, including the people who are obligated by their god to subjugate or kill us; and that everyone must be equally honored and respected, no matter how alien and incompatible they may be.
Here’s a simple, commonsense test to help us grasp the difference between liberalism and non-liberalism. Would Charles Martel have commissioned Muslim officers in his army? Would King Jan Sobieski have allowed Muslim doctors to enter his headquarters and move about at liberty among his men on the eve of deployment for battle against Muslims? Of course not. Because Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski were not liberals. They knew that Muslims were the enemy who intended the conquest and Islamization of Europe. They knew that there was a difference between us and them.
Nidal Malik Hasan—
Army major, medical doctor,
mass murderer, Muslim
“tragedy” (McCaffrey); “a horrific outburst of violence (Obama); “shocked and saddened … today’s outburst of violence … My heart goes out to their loved ones” (Kay Bailey Hutchison).
But how could they use other than passive, de-personalized language to describe a mass murder by an Army major and medical doctor named Malik Nadal Hasan? What are they supposed to say? That we have an enemy within, this enemy is Islam, and that we will not be safe or free until this enemy is removed from us? Since they can’t say that, being liberals, the only available language to them is the liberal language of meaningless, causeless catastrophe, and of our own helplessness to do anything about it.
And what is the alternative to such weakness, cowardice, dishonesty, and dishonor, and the suicidal danger into which they are leading us?
Truth.
I wrote in August 2006:
This is the unchangeable reality.… We will have terrorist attacks and threats of terrorists attacks and inconvenient and humiliating security measures and the disruption of ordinary activities FOREVER, as long as Muslims are in the West in any significant numbers.… The unchangeable fact is that wherever there is a sizable Muslim community there will be a very large number of terror supporters and therefore—inevitably—actual terrorists as well. This is our future, FOREVER, unless we stop Muslim immigration and initiate a steady out-migration of Muslims from the West until their remaining numbers are a small fraction of what they are now and there are no true believers among the ones that remain. Travelers from Muslim countries must be tightly restricted as well. Muslims must be essentially locked up inside the Muslim lands, with only carefully screened individuals allowed into the non-Muslim world.
The enemy are among us, in America, in Britain, in the West, and will remain so until we remove them from the West and indeed from the entire non-Muslim world. As extreme as this sounds, it is a no-brainer. There is no other solution. All other responses to this problem add up to meaningless hand-wringing. The hand-wringing will go on FOREVER, along with the terrorist attacks and the threat of terrorist attacks, until we take the ONLY STEPS that can actually and permanently end the threat.
View From The Right
America has had events like that which happened to our young men in the 'stan several times in Iraq. If you recall from the first Gulf war, the Americans had one of their (moslem) soldiers fragging a tent with several other soldiers in - and that was before the fighting started.
How can our young men and women be ordered to serve alongside armed moslems? It's fine for the politicians and generals to issue these orders - they are not the ones with an itch running right up their backs when there armed, ostensibly allied, moslems around.
I think it's about time all moslems were discharged from our armed forces. They cannot be trusted, and why should our young men be forced to take an unnecessary risk. Seems they can't even trust their doctors if they are moslem (and wasn't it moslem doctors who attacked Glasgow airport?) Their life is risky enough as it is.
Never forget: moslems have only one loyalty, and it is not to us, our country or our monarch. The liblabcon call some of them 'moderate' and some extremist. But they all read the same Book, so none can be trusted. None. Ever.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)