WHAT REALLY HAPPEND AT OSAMAS BURIAL

Ooops !

MOHAMMEDANS

It might have appeared to any man watching affairs in the earlier
years of the seventh century_say from 600 to 630_that only one great main
assault having been made against the Church, Arianism and its derivatives,
that assault having been repelled and the Faith having won its victory, it
was now secure for an indefinite time.

        Christendom would have to fight for its life, of course, against
outward unchristian things, that is, against Paganism. The nature
worshippers of the high Persian civilization to the east would attack us
in arms and try to overwhelm us. The savage paganism of barbaric tribes,
Scandinavian, German, Slav and Mongol, in the north and centre of Europe
would also attack Christendom and try to destroy it. The populations
subject to Byzantium would continue to parade heretical views as a label
for their grievances. But the main effort of heresy, at least, had
failed_so it seemed. Its object, the undoing of a united Catholic
civilization, had been missed. The rise of no major heresy need henceforth
be feared, still less the consequent disruption of Christendom.

        By A.D. 630 all Gaul had long been Catholic.  The last of the
Arian generals and their garrisons in Italy and Spain had become orthodox.
The Arian generals and garrisons of Northern Africa had been conquered by
the orthodox armies of the Emperor.

        It was just at this moment, a moment of apparently universal and
permanent Catholicism, that there fell an unexpected blow of overwhelming
magnitude and force. Islam arose_quite suddenly.  It came out of the
desert and overwhelmed half our civilization.

Go and read it all - it was written in 1937, so our elites cannot say "We didn't

know the nature of what we were letting in" 

http://www.ewtn.com/library/homelibr/heresy4.txt 

Morg

. 

HOOK

A seaman meets a pirate penguin in a bar, and talk turns to their adventures on the sea. The seaman notes that the penguin has a peg-leg, a hook, and an eye patch.

The seaman asks, "So, how did you end up with the peg-leg?" The penguin replies, "We were in a storm at sea, and I was swept overboard into a school of sharks. Just as my men were pulling me out, a shark bit my leg off."

"Wow!" said the seaman. "What about your hook"? "Well", replied the penguin, "We were boarding an enemy ship and were battling the other sailors with swords. One of the enemy cut my hand off."

"Incredible!" remarked the seaman. "How did you get the eye patch"? "A seagull dropping fell into my eye," replied pengy.

"You lost your eye to a seagull dropping?," the sailor asked incredulously. "Well," said pingu, "it was my first day with the new hook"

http://tiomarvo.blogspot.com/2011/05/hook.html

Morg
.

Lord Ahmed has commited an ACT' of TERRORISM

Lord Ahmed threatens Parliament into submission

"Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is, after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of their function in the legislature.

But no sooner had the unsuspecting baroness sent out her invitations, Lord Ahmed raised hell. It is reported that he ‘threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organising the event to court’.

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/01/lord-ahmed-threatens-parliament-into.html

------------------------------

After checking out something out about the CENSUS I came across a little snippet of Information regarding TERRORISM -

Definitions:

Under the Terrorism Act 2000:

“1 Terrorism: interpretation.

(1) In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where—

(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the government [For an international governmental organisation] or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and

(c) the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious [racial] or ideological cause.”

Under the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008:

“Meaning of “ancillary offence”

(1) In this Act “ancillary offence”, in relation to an offence, means any of the following—

(a) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of the offence (or, in Scotland, being art and part in the commission of the offence);

(b) an offence under Part 2 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (c. 27) (encouraging or assisting crime) in relation to the offence (or, in Scotland, inciting a person to commit the offence)”

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2011/02/22/2011-census-rebellion/

As you can see Lord Ahmed has committed offences under the TERRORISM ACT 2000.
And bragged about it in a Pakistani National Newspaper.
So, WHY is he not in Prison, as according to the Anti-Terrorism Act he has been caught redhanded.

Is it one law for us Indigenous British and another for the UNLAWFUL LORD (1689 BILL OF RIGHTS) Ahmed ?
A man who has no right to sit in the House of Lords or Parliament but is there all the same. Making Laws against the INDIGENOUS population.
Don't forget his Conviction and Jail term for killing a another person through using his mobile phone whilst driving

Throw this man in JAIL and those who have broken the ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS by allowing him or any other Foreigner to stand for Election to his Local Council and to stand for Election to Parliament.

When do we say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ?