Last night we attended a meeting at our venue in Hindley Green organised not by me but by other patriots in order to discuss our future strategy for nationalism.
The meeting was by invitation only in order that we could have a civilised discusion of the problems we face as a party and country.
It was NOT as has been suggested an anti party meeting but an opportunity to discuss between fellow nationalists ways to further our cause.
However if the party hierarchy had heard about the meeting it would have been "proscribed" ie members would have been forbidden to attend on pain of discipliniary action.
I and my wife have received summonses to attend disciplinary hearings for attending "proscribed" meetings in the past. Of course we have no intention as free people of submitting ourselves to such kangaroo courts which are reminiscent of Stalinist Russia.
The cause of this party turmoil are twofold.
First it is no good denying that recently we have not made the electoral impression we should have done in spite of the shambles caused by the coalition government and their economocally illiterate opposition.
The Front National in France has done so much better than we and we must ask Why?
Secondly in our party too much power rests with the chairman and his sycophantic and undemocratic Advisory Council, and dissent among party members is barely tolerated and searching questions result in the questioner being suspended.
What to do about these problems were the topics for debate last night.
Most, but not all stated that we need a new leader as in spite of all the good work he has done in the past is becoming a drag on our electoral prospects.
The way forward is not at present clear but similar meetings are being held all over the country in an attempt to arrive at a consensus on future action and build contacts between like minded patriots.
Last night we had senior party members from London Kent and Yorkshire as well as from all over South Lancashire and I thank them for making the effort.
It was also good to renew old aquaintances with people we had not met for several years.
It shows their committment to our cause and country.
Our meetings are intended to be constructive and form a basis for a leaner and more effective and democratic nationalist movement.
Lest the above seems a council of despair I have to say that nothing could be further from the truth.
There is an increasing hunger for our point of view, a hunger for a believable party or vehicle in which the will of the ordinary British people can be expressed and persued.
Recently we have not been capitalising on that hunger but there is a rich seam of nationalism waiting to be tapped. It is our job to mine this seam and we are determined not to be found wanting. But now we must set the systems in motion to do it even if it requires a new management, but whatever it takes we will endeavour to do it.
Opponents of nationalism and the British people, do not be deceived by our temporary regrouping.
There will be changes and maybe different personnel at the top but we will emerge rejuvenated and ready to tap into that portion of our people who have been betrayed, have no voice and who are increasingly desparate for true representation.
In Tunisia, Egypt, Libya etc it seemed things would never change as democracy was as here suppressed but as the last weeks have shown matters can change quickly when the people are given their voice.
It is our job to provide that voice AND THAT WE WILL DO.
