GET OLD AND LOOK FOREWARD TO THIS

Midland care home nurse accused of wiping elderly patient's bottom with a coat hanger

A MIDLAND care home nurse is facing a disciplinary hearing for allegedly wiping an elderly patient’s bottom with a broken coat hanger.

Nolulamo Mdubeki, known as Joyce, of Stafford Road, Cannock, will appear before the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) for a misconduct hearing.

Mdubeki was working at Richmond Hall Care Home, in Stonnall Road, Aldridge, when the claims were made over her treatment of a resident.

The alleged incident with the coat hanger is claimed to have occurred at the home on September 19, 2009.

Mdubeki no longer works at the care home as she resigned ahead of a disciplinary investigation.

A tenant eviction notice has been placed on the Mdubeki’s family home, which currently lies apprently abandoned.

Neighbour Jim Brown said the nurse went on holiday to her home country of South Africa three months ago but has not returned.

“No-one has seen Joyce for months,” said Mr Brown, who attended Chadsmoor Methodist Church with the nurse every Sunday. The landlords have been round looking for her, and the church minister.

“Joyce told us she stopped working at the care home because of her hip.”

A spokeswoman for Richmond Hall Care Home said: “The nurse was suspended immediately and the allegations reported to the appropriate authorities.’’

She said the nurse resigned prior to a disciplinary investigation being launched which ‘‘if proven would have led to her dismissal’’.

‘‘Richmond Hall received the nurse’s resignation prior to our disciplinary investigation which if proven would have led to her dismissal.

“All the information has been passed on to the Nursing and Midwifery Council to make a decision regarding the nurse’s professional future.”

The care home provides accommodation and nursing care for up to 64 people. If found guilty of the misconduct charge, Mdubeki faces being struck off the nursing register, a suspension or conditions being placed on her working practices.

The NMC hearing takes place tomorrow.

-----------------------

IS THIS HOW WE CARE FOR OUR OLD FOLK NOW?

CAMERON ET AL, WHO ARE LOADED, WILL NEVER EVER GET NEAR CARE HOMES WHICH THE ORDINARY MAN & WOMAN IN THE STREET END UP IN, WHY SHOULD THEY CARE WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR GRANDPARENTS OR PARENTS.

ARE YOU SUPPORTING FAR LEFT (NUJ) PROPAGANDA AND PAYING FOR IT?

BBC tells its staff: don’t call Qatada extremist

The BBC has told its journalists not to call Abu Qatada, the al-Qaeda preacher, an “extremist”.

"

In order to avoid making a “value judgment”, the corporation’s managers have ruled that he can only be described as “radical”.

Journalists were also cautioned against using images suggesting the preacher is overweight.

A judge ruled this week that the Muslim preacher, once described as “Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe”, should be released from a British jail, angering ministers and MPs.

Adding to the row, Kenneth Clarke, the Justice Secretary, yesterday insisted that Qatada “has not committed any crime” and said his release has nothing to do with the European Court of Human Rights.

A British court has called Qatada a “truly dangerous individual” and even his defence team has suggested he poses a “grave risk” to national security.

Despite that background, BBC journalists were told they should not describe Qatada as an extremist. The guidance was issued at the BBC newsroom’s 9.00am editorial meeting yesterday, chaired by a senior manager, Andrew Roy.

According to notes of the meeting, seen by The Daily Telegraph, journalists were told: “Do not call him an extremist – we must call him a radical. Extremist implies a value judgment.”

The guidance was criticised by experts and MPs. Maajid Nawaz of Quilliam, a counter-extremist think tank, accused the BBC of “liberal paralysis” over Islamic extremism, saying journalists must be honest about Qatada’s record. He said: “A radical is someone who is different from the norm. An extremist is someone who promotes extreme views and actions, like killing innocents.”

James Clappison, a Conservative member of the Commons home affairs select committee, said the guidance was unjustifiable. He said: “Given the evidence about this man, it makes you wonder what you have to do for the BBC to call you an extremist.”

BBC staff were also cautioned against using library images suggesting the cleric is overweight, because he has “lost a lot of weight”.

A BBC spokesman said: “We think very carefully about the language we use. We do not ban words – the notes are a reflection of a live editorial discussion about how to report the latest developments on this story.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9067754/BBC-tells-its-staff-dont-call-Qatada-extremist.html

-------------------

STOP PAYING THE BIASED BBC LICENCE FEE (Click on link below) -

http://www.tpuc.org/stoppayingtvlicencefees

http://biased-bbc.blogspot.com/

CCTV police officer 'chased himself' after being mistaken for burglar

An undercover police officer "chased himself round the streets" for 20 minutes after a CCTV operator mistook him for suspect.

The junior officer, who has not been named, was monitoring an area hit by a series of burglaries in an unnamed market town in the country’s south.

As the probationary officer from Sussex Police searched for suspects, the camera operator radioed that he had seen someone “acting suspiciously” in the area.

But he failed to realise that it was actually the plain-clothed officer he was watching on the screen, according to details leaked to an industry magazine.

The operator directed the officer, who was on foot patrol, as he followed the "suspect" on camera last month, telling his colleague on the ground that he was "hot on his heels".

The officer spent around 20 minutes giving chase before a sergeant came into the CCTV control room, recognised the “suspect” and laughed hysterically at the mistake.

You can read the rest of Constable hardys fine outstanding work here -

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9066337/CCTV-police-officer-chased-himself-after-being-mistaken-for-burglar.html

SEND THIS UGLY RAT HOME

The news that the islamic terrorist Abu Quatada is not to be deported and released this week will horrify the majority of British people.

It has, so she says, horrified Theresa May the Home Secretary who says she will appeal (no doubt at great cost) to the judges.

This ugly thug who after entering our country on a false passport has cost us £millions in benefits and legal fees while preaching his hate, but has been allowed to stay by judges (unelected) under EU laws which have had their goalposts changed to allow such a ruling.

The government including the home secretary are supposed to act in our interests and ensure our safety. That is their job.
They should not allow themselves to be overridden by judges.

Human rights legislation is invoked to prevent him being sent back to his own country to face charges of terrorism even though the British government has the reassurance he will not face torture in his own country.

If he was a computer "nerd" working in his bedroom he would be sent back as they threaten to do with sending Gary McKinnon to the USA where he will probably not survive.

On "Human Rights" we have also rights.

We have the rights to be kept free from attack by those who wish to do so.

We have the right to object to paying taxes to fund the dross of the world and the lawyers who make a good living out of them.

We have the human right (denied) to say who we want in our country and even the right to not have to keep looking at their ugly faces.

WE HAVE THE HUMAN RIGHT to be masters in our own country, again denied.

It's time the Government acted in OUR interests for a change and sent him back.

They have the political power and that trumps the decisions of the EU or any other legal cabal.

So Theresa, FOR ONCE SHOW YOU ARE ON THE SIDE OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITS.

Or are you too afraid of the Limp Dems or the EU or are you in hock to the overpaid traitors who call themselves judges?

CHILDREN 13 GIVEN CONTACEPTIVE IMPLANTS IN SCHOOLS WITHOUT PARENTS KNOWLEDGE.

The procedure was carried out in Southampton, Hants, as part of a government initiative to drive down teenage pregnancies.

As many as nine secondary schools in the city are thought to have been involved.

But it has caused a backlash from parents who weren't aware that their daughters had been fitted with the 4cm device, which sits under the skin.

It is currently unknown exactly how many youngsters have taken part in the scheme.

Parents say they have been forced to inspect their child's arm for any sign of the implant.

Health chiefs have defended sexual health services going into schools, saying teenage pregnancies had dropped by 22 per cent as a result.

But campaigners from the Family Education Trust say the implant fuels the flames of promiscuity by giving girls licence to have underage sex.

Norman Wells, director of the trust, has urged health chiefs to look at ways of discouraging sexual activity amongst children in the first place.

He said: "Schemes like these inevitably lead to boys putting pressure on girls to have sex.

"They can now tell their girlfriends: 'You can get the school clinic to give you an implant, so you don't have to worry about getting pregnant.'

"They'll tell them they don't have to face the embarrassment of going to see their doctor, and it's all confidential so their mum doesn't need to know a thing.

"Parents send their children to school to receive a good education, not to be undermined by health workers who give their children contraceptives behind their backs.

"Health authorities should be looking for ways of discouraging young people from engaging in sexual activity in the first place.

"The last thing they should be doing is fuelling the flames of promiscuity and the sexual health crisis with schemes that treat parents, the law and basic moral principles with contempt."

One mother, whose 13-year-old daughter was given the implant, has called the scheme "morally wrong".

She claimed the school had gone ahead without consulting their family doctor.

The woman, who wished to remain anonymous, said the pupils had to simply fill out a questionnaire about their medical history.

They then underwent a consultation with health experts before receiving the contraceptive but there was a lack of follow-up appointments.

She said: "I feel really angry about this.

"I agree that teaching teenagers about sexual health and contraception is very important but this is a step too far.

"To perform a minor surgical procedure on school grounds, without parents knowing is morally wrong.

"I'm told a long list of checks were made before she had this implant but how many 13-year-olds are aware of their full medical history?

"I cannot understand how this is allowed to happen.

"Teenagers have the right to protect themselves and she did the right thing by seeking advice but to not be checked after such a procedure is totally wrong.

"Luckily I now know but many other parents are unaware their daughter has one.

"I have spoken to a lot of parents at the school and they were horrified to find out this was happening.

"As parents we want to protect our children and I feel that has been taken away from me."

Alan Whitehead, Labour MP for Southampton Test, has now been asked to look into the matter.

He said: "This contraceptive implant clearly requires a surgical procedure which ought to be undertaken in suitable and appropriate conditions.

"I am not sure whether the services that are being offered at the moment enable this it happen and that is what I am going to be looking into."

Health chiefs have defended the scheme, insisting letters were sent to all parents at participating schools in 2009 when the service was launched.

It was then left to individual schools to inform parents of all future students joining, either by letter or in the prospectus.

They also say reports are showing that teenage pregnancies have dropped by 22 per cent since sexual health services went in to schools.

In Southampton there were as many as 136 pregnancies among 13 to 15 year olds in 2001 and 2003, this fell to 106 in 2007-2009.

A spokeswoman for Solent NHS Trust and NHS Southampton said: "We are committed to ensuring local young people are able to access clinically appropriate sexual health support.

"This helps them to avoid unwanted pregnancies and protect themselves from sexually transmitted infections.

"One element of this is commissioning a sexual health service for young people that is provided in nine secondary schools across the city.

"The service is provided by trained staff and includes offering information, advice and support to students.

"It also includes chlamydia screening, condom distribution, pregnancy testing, providing a range of contraception methods and referral to other services.

"Since the service was introduced there has been a reduction in the number of under 16-year-olds who have become pregnant.

"The service is provided by Solent NHS Trust which undertakes detailed medical assessments for all patients attending any sexual health clinic.

"In addition, all young people under the age of 16 who visit sexual health services receive a full risk assessment.

"This is over and above national guidance and meeting all legal requirements."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9065998/Girls-13-given-contraceptive-implants-at-school.html

-------------------------------------

I'm puzzled.

After forever being told TWO COMPLETE LIES by the authorities, which actually if true should cancel one another out.

1) WE HAVE AN EVER INCREASING AND AGEING POPULATION ?

Do we?

2)WE HAVE THE HIGHEST TEENAGE PREGNANCIES IN EUROPE ?

Do we?

Surely if we need to replace our aged population then with the HIGHEST TEENAGE PREGNANCIES IN EUROPE (teenage also covers the ages of 16-20) we can easily replace our aged population.

But we are NOT BEING ALLOWED TO REPLACE OURSELVES, if we do then we have to get into ABORTIONS, DAY AFTER PILL, MADE TO LOOK LIKE A FREAK ON JEREMY KYLE (BELITTLE THE WHITE SCUM WHO DARE TO HAVE CHILDREN WHEN THEY ARE YOUNG), you know the CHAVS, or LAYABOUTS, SINGLE MOTHERS (blame that on the DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY UNIT) so TAKE THEIR KIDS OFF THEM.

Doesn't it make sense that if we have an ageing population that you would be trumpeting the HIGHEST TEENAGE PREGNANCIES IN EUROPE AS CURE TO AN AGEING POPULATION, Would you not?

Instead we don't encourage the birth of the INDIGENOUS POPULATION we IMPORT IMMIGRANTS TO FILL THE PLACES OUR YOUTH SHOULD FILL BUT WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH YOUTH, IT'S THE HIGHEST TEENAGE PREGNANCIES IN EUROPE YOU SEE.

Now I'm not talking about young teenagers at school, as they shouldn't be having sex or be given CONTRACEPTIVES to assuage any guilt or fear of getting pregnant but is being pushed into immoral behaviour at such an early age in schools by being given CONTRACEPTIVES AT 13, THAT'S ANOTHER EDUCATION FAIL FOR OUR YOUTH, WHO TEACHES OUR YOUTH, LOONY LEFTWING FUNDAMENTALISTS OR INDOCTRINATED IGNORAMUS'S MASQUERADING AS TEACHERS AS THEY DON'T KNOW THEY'RE INDOCTRINATED AS THEY KNOW NO DIFFERENT, IT'S ALL THEY HAVE BEEN TAUGHT AND TOLD.

I wonder if WIGANS TWO LABOUR MPs COULD CLEAR MY CONFUSION UP ?

WHAT IS IT -

THE HIGHEST TEENAGE PREGNANCY'S IN EUROPE (should mean we have a plentiful supply of OUR OWN PEOPLE TO REPLACE) AN AGEING POPULATION (we should have a lowering of our AGEING POPULATION due to the HIGH INDIGENOUS BIRTHS to these TEENAGE MOTHERS (HIGHEST IN EUROPE), and if OUR YOUTH are NOT REPLACING OUR AGED WHY ?