EUROPEAN WAR? I DON'T THINK SO

The Euro is collapsing. The leaders of the Euro countries know it but will not admit it.
They will not admit their globalistic fascist idea is becoming unscrambled.
They know that Greece can never pay its debts and neither possibly can Italy.

The European Central Bank has injected billions of Euros and all to no avail. There is still no confidence in this Ponzi scheme.
They have sent a delegation cap in hand to China asking for help which they are not likely to get without strings.
Meanwhile the people of Europe are suffering with increased uncertainty and unemployment and costs made necessary by the bank interest they have to pay.
The bankers meanwhile still make millions from lending this money which has been created out of thin air and lending it out at great profit.

But say the leaders of Europe we MUST save the Euro. It will be disaster if it fails.
We could have war in Europe.

What a load of rubbish.
When was the last time the ordinary people of Europe went to war? I can not remember a time.
It has always been the rulers who attacked each others countries using their peoples as cannon fodder.
Even in the Arab states the turmoil is between the rulers and those ruled, so why would we European peoples attack each other?

Yes there could and will be violence. I am beginning to feel it is inevitable but that violence will be that of the people against their rulers who have stolen their birthright.
The people will rise up against those who have ruined their lives,stolen their money and jobs,altered their society and flooded it with immigrants.

There could be a people's uprising or "peasants revolt" against those responsible, those in power now. This could be accompanied by a civil war in European countries fought between true Europeans and interlopers brought here by the present rulers.

People all over the world react in the same way to injustice. One only has to look at Libya and the way its rulers have been treated by those now in power. Gadaffi may be gone but those who he imported to prop up his vile regime are also now targetted. It is not pleasant but inevitable. When people finally gain an element of freedom they can take the law into their own hands.

Thus I see the breakup of the European Union as an unpleasant episode, nasty but necessary medicine which will lower all our living standards, but do our leaders see just that?

With their talk of war could they have the fear that some of them may face the same fate as Gadaffi and other dictators?

NOT WAR BUT CIVIL WAR.

IT COULD HAPPEN. and that is what worries them, their own skins.

COWARDICE IN THE FACE OF THE ENEMY.

" COUNTER terrorism police are investigating a Muslim group after supporters called an MP a “Jewish homo pig”.

Conservative MP Mike Freer was holding an advice surgery in the mosque in Margaret Thatcher’s former constituency of Finchely, north London, when the radicals hurled abuse on Friday afternoon.

They screamed at him that as someone who is gay he was “not welcome in a house of Allah”.

Mr Freer, who is not Jewish but who is a member of the Conservative Friends of Israel and the All Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia, said the protesters were “aggressive” and that he had been forced to call Finchley’s Met Police borough commander to complain.

It is now understood that Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorist unit is investigating the Muslims Against Crusades group, which has also issued a chilling warning to any MP representing Muslims in Britain.

In a statement on its website, they have told every MP to remember what happened to Stephen Timms, the former Labour minister who was stabbed while holding an advice surgery in east London last year.

His Al Qaeda-inspired attacker, Roshonara Choudhry, 22, was sentenced to life imprisonment and a number of other MPs who were on her target list were offered extra police protection.

The Muslims Against Crusades statement reads: “We warn Mike Freer and every other MP in Britain that their presence is no longer welcomed in any Muslim area and that examples such as Stephen Timms should serve as a piercing reminder of this.

“Muslims have had enough of freedom and democracy and are fervently working for the implementation of the Shariah.

Although the group is relatively small and dismissed by moderate Muslims as insignificant lunatics, their supporters include convicted terrorists.

Its major British figurehead is radical hate-preacher Anjem Choudary, a lieutenant of Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad who is now banned from entering Britain and is in jail in Lebanon.

Mr Freer, elected in 2010, was targeted by the group because he had demanded that Palestinian Sheikh Raed Salah be banned from the UK this summer.

Salah was arrested in June and now faces deportation after Home Secretary Theresa May said his presence and his alleged virulent anti-Semitism was not conducive to the public good.

Mr Freer said yesterday: “I’ve a long record of working with local mosques and this was the second time I’d held a surgery at the North Finchley Mosque, which is very moderate.

“I was made aware that a woman member of the mosque had started a campaign against me.

“She came into the surgery as a constituent but also with a gang of others from outside the area who started
haranguing me and screaming abuse calling me a Jewish homo pig.

“They said because I was gay, I was not welcome in a House of Allah. It was all very aggressive.

“Both the mosque and I are determined not to let these people stop the work we are doing among faith communities.”

However, Muslims Against Crusades added: “As a member of the Conservative party, Mike Freer has the blood of thousands of Muslims on his hands.”

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/280598/Muslim-fanatics-abuse-MP-at-mosque

------------------------

Now lets see the Police arrest and charge these Islamists with RACISM, HOMOPHOBIA and ANTI-SEMITSM, can't wait for the UAF to oppose the Islamsists and support their LGBT members against Islamists HOMOPHOBIA and their JEWISH supporters against the ANTI-SEMITISM displayed by Islamists and RACIST remarks directed at a White man?

I won't hold my breath.

FLUSHING THE DRAINS

I take back what I said last night. The BNP conference in Liverpool will indeed prove to be the best ever, not for the content but for its effect in flushing the drains of Liverpool out.

The fat undemocratic pig Joe Anderson (pictured) demonstrated the contempt for democracy of the Labour group in Liverpool by threatening the landlord of the venue where the BNP annual conference was held with termination of his licence if he did not end the meeting and throw the participants out.

I believe Nick Griffin did the democratic cause a power of good in this instance in flushing undemocratic scum such as Anderson from their holes. How he ever was elected is a mystery to me. He can hardly speak (you almost need subtitles to understand him) and it says much about the intellect of those who voted for him.

No wonder Liverpool , my city of birth is a basket case city with undemocratic ignoramouses supposedly running it. Yes it all looks new now owing to massive EU funding but think what the city could become and what it will be when these thickos are on their own. Think what it could be if people of reason and intelligence were in charge. It has been betrayed in the past by its rulers and is being now and when the money stops rolling in it will be left to the likes of Anderson a course man of dubious talents who does not believe in democracy to run it.

God help it.

Nick Griffin has done the democrats a service in this case as he was the bait to entice the worm out of its hole. Anderson would not have bothered if Andrew Brons was running the show as he would probably never have ever heard of him.

So Nick, although I have criticized you in the past you did a good job in this instance, but poor Liverpool at having a such uneducated pig of a leader.

REMINDS ONE OF "NAPOLEON" IN ANIMAL FARM.

AN EXCITING WEEK END?

HOW IT SHOULD BE DONE

The great day has arrived, the one we have all been waiting for. The Annual BNP Conference starts today. It will of course be the best ever (it always is). This time owing to the Party being "the most rapidly growing party in the country" members are invited to bring guests.

This is a new approach and I presume on account of a much bigger venue found, or perhaps the bargain price of £25 for two days. Previously attendance was strictly limited to voting members so the new rules are an indication of the massive growth in membership from over 14,000 to perhaps 7,000 (well you can grow down). It will certainly be a full house like the picture above which was taken at the "Ideas" conference last weekend.

One thing that puzzles me in recent pictures on the official site is that few photos are taken of the audience, most of them being of the "Top table". Arthur Kemp always advised against this method of recording meetings, saying it was better to illustrate the enthusiastic throngs at these meetings.

There have been pictures of meetings and events such as The Trafalgar Dinner which illustrated two tables, nicely laid out but no photo of the venue crowded with guests enjoying their meal. There was I admit a picture of the visit to Walsingham Abbey by members of the club but for propaganda purposes it would have been better to have given a visual impression of the large numbers attending this fest. Or maybe there were not so many attendees. No that can't be true in a "rapidly growing party" or can it. In future I would ask the compilers of reports on the main web site to include ALL those attending meetings and functions so that people can rejoice in the rapid progress the Party is making.

The picture of the meeting at the top shows how it should be done although those present there were it seems subsidized by George Soros and Searchlight and thus traitors. That is possibly the reason that the admission fee was £2 rather than £15, but it's nice to have a billionaire at the back of you.

I await news of the "exciting new initiatives" from the "best ever" meeting this week end.

A LETTER FROM LANKYPAPODOPOLIS.

Let me introduce myself. My name is Lankypapodopolis and as you can gather by my name I am a Greek citizen.
I am in employment and have a good job and income I get from private business.
It is great here. I do not have to pay much in the way of taxation as my friend is the tax inspector and for a small fee he neglects to send me any tax demands.
This is a great situation for me as the EU is pumping billions of Euros into the economy to stop mu country from defaulting.
We all know it will but I am putting all my money abroad and in gold before this happens so that when it does I will be OK.

I know my friend Lanky Schmitt of Germany does not like paying his taxes to pay me but that is the price of Germany being in the Euro and it helps him as his exports are cheaper and he can sell more of his cars and machinery.
I hope he continues to do this so I can transfer more money out of the system but Mr Schmitt is getting a bit fed up.
He may make more money from his machine exports but he loses most of it by giving it to me.

Any sensible person can see that this situation can not carry on for ever but the politicians are keen for it to continue and while they strive to prevent the inevitable collapse I will continue to convert the paper money they have given me into property and gold.

Government workers here in Greece are getting restive over their reduced job prospects and wages imposed by the EU and there is civil strife in the streets but I am well off and as long as the politicians cling to the EU delusion I am happy,even though I know it is not just. I know that billions of Euros have been withdrawn from the banks here and taken abroad, to safeguard their money.

I note that tonight that in Britain Cameron has had a rebellion from his more honest MPs on his renaging of his pre election promises. He wants still to be part of the shambles although thew people of Britain do not want it, but when did politicians in what is supposedly a democratic country actually do what the people want.
Cameron and his cronies are more interested in the banks and his wealthy friends just as our government is. They are all the same and people such as I benefit.

Any sensible person realises that this system of creating money out of thin air only benefits the rich and moneylenders. Those who have money convert this imaginary vehicle of exchange into solid assets, and I am one of those. My yacht is worth hundreds of thousands of Euros, and I have a stash of gold.

Politicians have no inkling of the real world, the differences in countries and seek a unified Europe as a prelude to a global economy run of course by them.
They do not realise differnet countries have different geography, resources and cultures and seek to blend these into an amorphous mix under their control.
The peoples of the European countries do not like it but to the politicians with their grand delusions of world government they are ignored.

Cameron said tonight that if your neighbours house was on fire you would help him. Of course you would but that would not mean staying in the house with him and burning to death. You would stay outside and help the fire brigade.
He is an idiot or more likely has another agenda.

Well they are not getting my money.
I will keep taking the EU largesse until it runs out and possibly my Italian friends will do the same.
When this Eurofarce eventually does collapse I will be OK but the poor of the rest of Europe will face financial hardship.

I did not make these stupid rules and am not resposible for them . My motive as a wealthy Greek is to protect myself as I am sure all other wealthy Europeans are doing.

The poor will suffer but that fact is the responsibility of the politicians and the unelected bureaucrats of Brussels.

Democracy originated in my country so perhaps it will by defaulting in its debts it will bring the undemocratic house of cards which is the EU down and thus contribute to a new era of freedom after the inevitable hardship of all ordinary Europeans.

It will be worth it for the poor and I am protected as my assets are out of the reach of the government.

MORE ON THE "IDEAS" CONFERENCE

Having had more time to digest the BNP ideas meeting and time to gather my thoughts and analyse the tone and atmosphere of the meeting I realise the difference between this meeting and other BNP meetings I have attended.

First the participants (not audience) were not all Party members.
There was no omnipotent hierarchy dominating the meeting.

Of course there was a "top table" including Andrew Brons but the meeting was chaired fairly and of course competently by Arthur Kemp.
There was the chance of all present, members and nonmembers but all nationalists to have their say as how to best progress the cause.

Arthur Kemp stated at the beginning that we should not dwell too much on the past but that our purpose was to find a way to promote the cause in the future. Many different ideas were considered from starting a new party to joining a new party.
All were agreed that the need to unite the nationalist cause, but how? What is the best way?
All present were allowed to have their input and in the end the consensus was that a new party was unviable.
It was agreed that the BNP had a toxic reputation but that was largely owing to the malign influence of Nick Griffin and his cohorts, but that cleansed of him and these others a new clean party, untainted by them could emerge.

The BNP in its present form it was agreed was finished with a decreasing membership and questions to be answered regarding financial and other aspects of its management due to be answered in court.
So what was decided?

A new party it was considered was a non starter and bound to fall into oblivion as will the many new micro nationalist parties which have sprung up in the last year.

The consensus of the meeting was that we should have a parallel group with no name ( to avoid proscription) ready to take over when the inevitable demise of the present BNP occurs.

Contacts should be made with existing BNP members as well as those formerly with us to join this NATIONALIST grouping in readiness to take over when the time comes.

Of course this puts more work on to Andrew Brons but with others in the room the burden on him can be lessened.
Andrew was reluctant to take on any extra work. He was there because of his belief in our country and people, not his pocket, which makes him unique among politicians.

And finally, the attendees were self selected from the best of our nationalist bretheren.
All they wished for was UNITY, and that was evident at the meeting.

So whatever happens to the dieing corpse of the present BNP there will with the help of those at the meeting a new CLEAN vehicle to take the cause of Nationalism, patriotism and our country forward.

WE SAW QUALITY YESTERDAY

HAS NICK GRIFFIN LOST HIS MARBLES?

A few years a good friend of ours, a shop proprieter became increasingly unconcerned when my wife went to purchase from her. Afterwards my wife said she was not going there again although she had been a longtime friend.
On another occasion a man I knew who ran an off licence held up another similar shop, a man who knew him. He was of course arrested as his victim knew him. We all thought it strange at the time.

The two above I am using as illustrations of what can go wrong with people's minds.
They were later diagnosed as suffering from brain tumours, which had altered their personalities from those we liked into another alien frame of mind.

I believe Nick Griffin is suffering from some cerebral disturbance.
Last year I thought he was God until he began to renage on his promises and "fix" motions at party meetings to ensure his long term control of OUR party in an undemocratic way by schemes such as proxy votes.

Now it seems anybody with whom he disagrees is a traitor. No free speech or opinions there then.

Today we went to the "BNP Ideas" in Leicester, a very civilised meeting with eloquent patriotic speakers who tolerated differnt opinions. No black garbed "security" were in attendance and we met many old friends.
Some had left the party, some had been thrown out or sacked for asking questions (Griffinite democracy) and many remained but were in dispair at the failing fortunes of the party in which we sought our national salvation and which claims rapid growth, in spite of losing two thirds of its membership.

At the meeting I was informed that Griffin had "tweeted"(I don't go on it) that the attendees were all in the pay of George Soros or Searchlight spies.

What planet is this man on? These people were those who had worked with and supported him and were not meeting to destroy Nationalism.
We met to save Nationalism from the destruction visited upon our creed by the present hierarchy.
We can see the fall in support in electoral results and local activism. If Griffin can not see this he has lost his mind.

I DO believe there are moles in the party, but they are not to be found in those ejected as they would not be very good moles.

They are to be found in those AT THE TOP of the party and not those present at the WELL ATTENDED meeting.

Anyone who wished could speak from the floor, and different views were respectfully heard.
We differed in certain aspects of the best way forward but we were united in our desire to save our country and culture.

We know that and agreed that Nick Griffin is an impediment. He is an electoral liability.
How do I know? The electors tell me and have told others at the meeting.
If he had any decency he would resign in the interests of the cause, if indeed he believes in it.

But we know he won't.

He shows obvious signs of paranoia. He thinks people are against him. Many are, so why does he not just go and leave the nationalist field to flourish without his baggage. He seems to be determined to stay whatever. Like Gadaffi he believes all nationalists love him.

Or perhaps he has a brain malfunction.

If he believes those at our meeting today are in the pay of George Soros he is certainly wrong in the head.

CASHLESS SOCIETY ?

Now they want to take your cash off you.

If they have control of your money electronically how easy is it for THEM to stop you accessing YOUR MONEY or PAYING BILLS etc?

And what if you belong to a political party that the LIB/LAB/CON party don't like?

Your money could soon dissappear, access blocked, payments taken out unauthorised, instant fines.

They want to control OUR FINANCES.



Do you trust THEM ?

WILL THE LIBYANS RETURN?

The news that Gadaffi has been overthrown partly by Libya's own people but mainly because of the assistance of NATO and especially Britain and France opens up a new era.

The reason for Cameron's and Sarkozy's assistants in overthrowing the tyrant are as yet unclear but the attitude of the two countries to Libya seems to have reversed in the last two years.
They knew he was a tyrant but still dealt with and were friendly to him before.

Were they waiting for an uprising to depose him? It looks like it. But why?
Why were our forces deployed in Libya and not in the other dictatorial countries of the Middle East? After all they are all run by tyrant regimes.
What about Syria? Their government has killed thousands and continues to kill every day.
Is Syria too strong or has too little oil or too close to Israel? We are not told the reason for this differing policy. I know Hague has said a few strong words to them. That'll frighten Assad.

The barbaric treatment of Gadaffi showed what a rabble we have supported and what we face if these people ever are in a position of power in Britain.
Even in Nazi Germany the perpetrators of atrocities were given a fair trial before their end.
That is the difference between barbarism and Western standards.

This treatment of a tyrant will have unfortunate side effects.
Assad will not wish for the same fate in Syria and will fight harder to preserve his life and regime. What has he to lose? only the lives of the Syrian people.
And there are the dictatorships of Arabia, Yemen and Saudi to name but two. Why not them ?
Do we fear the loss of their oil? The leaders of these countries will also fear the same fate as Gadaffi and will fight harder to preserve themselves.

It seems freedom is very important but not as important as financial motives.
There is far more to this squalid intervention than democracy as there is little hope of it in any muslim country. They don't want it in any case.

Much as I deprecate the actions of those complicit in the final demise of Gadaffi I am glad he is no more.
It will solve two problems at the same time.
The new democratic Libya will attract all those of that nation who are at present here as refugees. They will relish the opportunity of returning to their own country and to help to rebuild it.
Their departure will ease the pressure on housing here.
If enough return it will obviate the need as expressed by Tessa Jowell for people such as myself and my wife who selfishly live in three bedroom houses since our children fled the nest.

We are told we should move to a one bedroom apartment to ease the housing shortage and make room for those with large families (usually muslims).

I know this might seem a bit selfish but I don't want to move. Yes we have two spare bedrooms now but we have made this house our home.
We have put our stamp on it and want to end our days, however selfish that might seem.

The return of the Libyans will help to solve this crisis.
If that is not enough the house (mansion) occupied by champagne socialist Tony Blair I believe has great potential to be broken up into large apartments to provide suitable accommodation for Somalian "refugees" up to the standards they expect.

Meanwhile we will remain in our more humble abode safe in the knowledge that a mass exodus of Libian patriots is about to occur.

OR IS IT?

Courts need not be bound by Europe, says top judge

British courts do not need to be bound by European human rights rulings, the country’s most senior judge said yesterday.

"

Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, said the UK need only “take account” of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights but not necessarily follow it.

His comments will be seized upon by David Cameron who is furious with a series of rulings by the Strasbourg court imposed on the UK.

The Prime Minister is resisting a demand from Europe to give some prisoners a vote after the court ruled the current blanket ban is unlawful but is under increasing pressure to abide by it.

The domestic courts had all agreed with Government policy but the human rights challenge won in Europe.

Giving evidence to the Lords Constitutional Committee, Lord Judge was asked whether Strasbourg “always wins”.

He said: “I would like to suggest that maybe Strasbourg shouldn’t win and doesn’t need to win.”

“I think for Strasbourg I think there is yet a debate to happen, it will have to happen in the Supreme Court, about what we really do mean in the Human rights Act, what parliament means in the Human Rights Act, when it said that the courts in this country must take account of the decisions of European Court of Human Rights.

“I myself think it is at least arguable that having taken account of the decision of the court in Strasbourg our courts are not bound by them. Give them due weight in most cases obviously, we would follow them but not, I think, necessarily.”

The Human Rights Act, which the last Labour Government passed, enshrined the European Convention of Human Rights in to British law.

Lord Phillips, the President of the Supreme Court, told the peers that Strasbourg can cause “serious problems” when it rules against the UK courts.

But he said that as long as the Human Rights Act existed Strasbourg would win.

The Government has been given a further stay by Europe on its demand to impose prisoner voting pending the outcome of a similar case involving Italy.

Mr Cameron has suggested replacing the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights.

He also plans to use the UK’s presidency of the Council of Europe from next month to lead a radical shake – up of the European human rights court.

However, he was warned last month by his own commission examining a Bill of Rights that radical reform of the court would not prevent it again overruling Parliament on issues such as allowing prisoners to vote.

In other issues, Lord Judge warned ministers that their open criticism of decisions of the courts that they do not like is “damaging”.

The relationship between parliament and judiciary was strained earlier this year in a row over the growing use of injunctions and claims that the courts were effectively creating a law of privacy by stealth.

Asked about a public perception of antagonism between parliament and the judiciary, he said: “It would help if Government ministers did not cheer when they agree with a judicial decision or boo when they disagree.

“That is, I think, very undesirable and I think it is damaging. If we got rid of that I think it would be much easier.”"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8836487/Courts-need-not-be-bound-by-Europe-says-top-judge.html

WHO POLICES THE POLICE?

Police chiefs 'authorised undercover police officers to give false evidence in court'

"

The claims led to Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary delaying a report into undercover police tactics at the last minute.

It had been due to be published today and was thought to be critical of the police.

Lawyers for a convicted protester claim a Metropolitan Police officer called Jim Boyling, posing as an activist, was prosecuted alongside their client and lied under oath to conceal his true identity.

Solicitors from the law firm Bindmans claim Boyling pretended to be Jim Sutton between 1995 and 2000 and joined the non-violent organisation Reclaim the Streets, the Guardian newspaper reported.

As part of his role, Bindmans claim, he was prosecuted at Horseferry Road magistrates court in London in 1997 for disorderly behaviour in a three-day trial.

He maintained his fiction during the entire prosecution, they allege, giving a false name and occupation and lying under oath.

Bindmans are appealing on behalf of John Jordan, an activist who was convicted of assaulting a police officer and given a one-year conditional discharge.

They claim Boyling would potentially have been able to use his knowledge of the activists’ defence to boost the prosecution’s case.

It has previously been claimed that Boyling married an activist he met while undercover in the environmental protest movement, and that he went on to have children with her.

Peter Black, another police officer who worked in the same undercover unit as Boyling, said the case was not unique.

Black said occasional prosecutions for regular involvement in public disorder were allowed to go ahead because it helped to build their credibility with activists.

A spokesman for the Met Police said the force was already reviewing issues regarding the deployment of undercover officers.

He added: “The Metropolitan Police Service acknowledges that these are serious matters and is continuing to review the situation, and will take account of any additional information that becomes available.”

A spokeswoman for HMIC said their report had been delayed to “consider the relevance” of the new claims.

She added: “We will be writing to The Guardian and Newsnight [which also ran the story] to invite them to provide any additional information they may have.”

Three different inquiries have been launched following the controversy surrounding Mark Kennedy, a Metropolitan police officer who spent seven years working undercover before turning against his seniors.

Some of the HMIC materiel expected to be published on Thursday was to have examined his role and those of his controllers."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8837724/Police-chiefs-authorised-undercover-police-officers-to-give-false-evidence-in-court.html

IDEAS FOR THE "IDEAS" CONFERENCE

Perhaps the most important conference in Nationalist history for years takes place on Saturday in what could be a make or break moment for our Nationalist movement
The BNP ideas will give all interested people a chance to put forward their opinion of the way forward.

After the euphoria following the election of our two MEPs and three county councillors the BNP has been on the slide.
We really did think we were on the way to even more success, so why did we fail and dissillusion and factionalism set in? Why did our electoral results and percentages decline? Why has Party membership declined?

Why have we failed to connect with the electorate when the omens for national disaster are so obvious?
WE SHOULD BE GOING FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH.

WHAT HAVE WE DONE WRONG?

The loss of morale in our activist base owing to shady financial practices, arbitrary sackings and the promotion of unsuitable people to posts of authority have meant the loss of virtually all the best talent in the BNP with a consequent decline in intelligent policies.

It has been alleged that many now not in the Party are moles or Searchlight spies, the usual rubbish.
I believe we have been infiltrated but I also believe those infiltrators are still in positions of power in the Party such as the Advisory Council. After all it's not much use being a spy if you are expelled and can exert no influence.

Many good people with a long history of hard work and valuable contributions to the nationalist cause have now, wrongly in my opinion deserted to the plethora of smaller parties which suit their own particular brand of nationalism. It's almost as if there are as many different brands of nationalism as there are nationalists, each with their own priorities.
In addition there are many who share our views but would not call themselves Nationalist but just people wishing for a more just country where our people come first, and above all--

THEY DON'T LIKE NICK GRIFFIN. In spite of his narrowly winning the leadrship, he is a vote loser with the general electorate.

There are policies of all these groups and small parties with which I agree and some with which I do not.
Just say I agree with 80% of BNP policies, 80% of English Democrat and 80% of Freedom policies and even 50% of UKIP policies, and I possibly do that still leaves 50% of the policies of those parties with which I agree.
So what are we doing now. We are concentrating on the small percentages where we differ.
The broad spectrum of nationalist minded people agree on the core policy which is the well being of our country and people.

SO
We should first of all be generalist nationalist parties. We should not argue the differences between Ethnic and Civic nationalism.
WE should avoid inflammatory "racist" remarks which allow the media to tar us with the "Fascist" brush which they will do however unjustified that is. We must avoid criticizing Jews, many of them support us but are fearful of voting for us.

The Middle East is nothing to do with us, another poloicy which puts people off voting for us.
Our policy on that is "we have none".

We should avoid detailed policy statements apart from those of a broad Nationalism. Thus homosexuality, abortion, guns or capital punishment should not be core policies.
These and many others can be reasons why people are dissuaded from voting for us.
The official line on even some of these policies I disagree with and stressing them divides us when we are otherwise in agreement. In my case these details do not matter in the broad nationalist context BUT TO MANY THEY DO, and stressing or even mentioning these loses us votes and support.

WE need all the votes we can garner from all those who agree with us on most things but are put off by minor details.

Margaret Thatcher did not say in her manifesto she would destroy the coal and other industries and squander our industrial might and North Sea oil to do so.
She even promised to curb immigration and renaged on it after she gained power.

Ring any bells? Cameron and his referendum for example.

Tony Blair did not promise to go to war as America's poodle or massively increase immigration, but look what happened.

We must cease having a multitude of small policy details, each of which is important to somebody and their inclusion stops their support for us.

We must be broad brush Nationalists and Patriots and put minor differences behind us.

So yes we should put a stop to immigration, foreign control of our industries, green and other taxes which cost us dear in our fuel bills and put our industries at a disadvantage ,engagement in foreign wars and exit the EU.
We must stress our determination to remain a British society whose ancient values are preserved.

These few headings encompass our core beliefs and THOSE OF THE MAJORITY OF THE ELECTORATE, and that is the point if we are ever to get elected to any power.

I would hope this conference will delegate a committee to seek negotiations with the other nationalist groups to combine under the banner of a new untainted party for our mutual benefit.
It would of course have to dissociate itself from the toxic BNP brand, but be open to all true nationalists, apart from some of the present leadership.
We would have to put behind us old personal animosities . Forgive and forget. Friendship although pleasant is not the primary cause.
UNITY AND COOPERATION IS.

WE must show the British people we are on their side. We do have to accept that many non muslim families who have been here for years will have to be allowed to remain if they integrate.
I don't like it any more than anyone else but facts are facts and we can not unbake the cake.

BUT, if we unite under these proposals we can stop our cake getting burnt.
It depends on us.

OUR PRIMARY CAUSE IS THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY.

OUR PRIMARY METHOD CAN ONLY BE UNITY.

OUR PRIMARY GOAL IS NATIONAL SALVATION.

WE MUST PREVAIL.

DEY EAT DA POO POO

I suppose David Cameron will now stop FOREIGN AID to UGANDA.

BNP IDEAS CONFRENCE 22 OCT

October 22nd will see the BNP Ideas conference, at which the future direction of nationalism in the UK could well be decided.

It is certainly clear that we cannot go on as we are under the lame duck leadership of Nick Griffin, forever tainted by financial scandals and underhanded shenanigans.

Nick and his doings are the past though, what we must decide now is where we must go from here, and how we will take nationalism, the only hope of Britain and the British people, forward.

It is the perfect time for nationalism to thrive - how we will make that happen is key. Not continuing to pick apart the past, not rehashing what is water under the bridge, not bogging ourselves down with yesterdays news.

Learn from the past and move on to a brighter future.

I do not know how the conference will turn out, or what will be decided, but I am optimistic - we have so many great people who do, and will, work selflessly to make sure that Britain has a future.

Together we will move forward, we will make this work out. We can make it work and indeed we must make it work. Britain has no other choice, it's now or never.

Should all go to plan we at Southwest Nationalists will be bringing you live updates on this website throughout the day as events unfold, so be sure to check back in often on the 22nd if you can't make it along to the conference in person, we should be posting throughout the day.

http://southwestnationalists.blogspot.com/2011/10/bnp-ideas-conference-swn-update.html#comment-form

MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS SHOW HOW MUCH THEY LOVE WHITEY IN BRITAIN.

TACKLE THE BANKS

The protests against the capitalist system seem to be continuing across the globe, although little is reported in the press.
For information one has to go to the Russian television to see some of what is happening.

Yes I know much of it is propaganda but so is what of what we are force fed in the West.
There is a general and growing disquiet and dissatisfaction with the way the banks are controlling society.

In the comments sections of some of our national paapers people have been saying, why protest against the banks? It is our governments which are responsible.
People who write thus do not understand that our governments do not run or control our countries or the banks. Indeed the banks finance the major parties in this country. They are at the root of the problem so the place to demonstrate is at the corrupt heart of the system, the banks and financial sector.

THE BANKS CONTROL THE GOVERNMENT.

I am in an unusual position here. Usually I am not on the side of various protesters which are often infiltrated by anarchists and Social Workers party people (an oxymoron if ever I heard one).
Most of those now demonstrating are those who have had their birthright thieved by the system
It is no fault of theirs that they must pay for further education, that there are few apprenticeships or that their education has been so poor, infested as it is by PC nonsense.
It is not their fault that they have as a result no jobs, large debts and no chance of having the funds to set up home.

It is the fault of our generation or those in power of our generation.
I sympathise with those betrayed young and unemployed people who are in a no win situation.

The cause of this generational disaster is solely down to the financial stranglehold the banks and the City of London have on our society.

They sold our assets. They financed corrupt governments to reduce regulations which made them able to sell our "family silver"
In effect the banks and financial institutions are the boss of our government and media.

So what do we do?

Many of the protesters can not remain as they have their jobs to go to tomorrow (some to pay their debts to, guess who?)
Many people for various reasons are unable to contribute to this worldwide anti capitalist movement.

Now I am a big believer of private enterprise. I see no wrong in entrepeneurs and successful businessmen making money.
If they have by their efforts made millions, good luck to them. They have been successful at what they do. They have often created jobs aided our economy. Just as overpaid footballers make massive amounts, their skill with media exposure has enabled them to cash in.
If they no longer attract people to watch them they lose their lucrative jobs, which is as it should be.

What I can't stomach is bankers holding the country to ransom, not by virtue of their ability but just because they control the money and they feel entitled to feed off the rest of society, sentencing many to poverty.

BANKERS PRODUCE NOTHING

If (an this is not something I would ordinarily say) a general strike was called against the banks I would be all for it.
For various reasons such as people's jobs this can not and will not happen.

BUT WE CAN STILL STRIKE BACK.

The banks depend on our deposits, using them to lend at interest.
Anyone who has a current account should try to reduce the amount in it. They pay no interest on it so take as much as possible out just leaving enough to pay important bills.

Pay in cash so that those you owe to do not need to deposit your money in the banks.
If you have spare cash, dont leave it in the bank. Lend it to a TRUSTED friend to pay off their credit card so that they do not need to pay extortionate rates of interest to the banks,and if you can .
DO NOT HAVE A CREDIT CARD. Wait until you can afford non essentials. Get them when you can afford them or borrow off a friend and not the bank.

I know we can not do all these things but if we all do a bit we will limit the banks hold over us.
They are feeding off us. But with a bit of thought we can all do a bit.

The cashless society is just another way of channelling all transactions through the banks and each time they make a profit, and their bosses "earn" their obscene bonuses.

CUT THEM OUT, and squeeze their profits and do your bit to bring them to heel.

All people need to do their little bit to get these parasites of our collective backs, so help your friends (you know who they are) and help take our assets and country back.

THE NWO?

Do the protets in Wall Street, Sydney, Taiwan and now in London against the present banking system indicate a collapse of the present banking system?

They could and are certainly a sign of people's increasing frustration with the system of Global Capitalism.
At last people are seeing the way they have been cheated by this iniquitous system which allows banks to create money out of thin air and lend it out at interest. This system has so many defects one could ask why has it lasted so long.
In micocosm the reason can be seen in New York with the aggressive police tactics, far more violent than they would in other situations.
It is because of what the demonstrators say.
ONE PERCENT RULES THE OTHER NINETY NINE PERCENT.

THE BANKERS ARE THE BOSSES, and any protest against them will be snuffed out.

The financial crises all over the world with all countries seeming to borrow money in unimaginable amounts shows the global financial system is heading for collapse.
Hopefully the Eurozone will collapse within months but what the ramifications of that will be no one knows.
What we do know is that in spite of all the so called economics experts global finances and with them standards of living are in a tailspin., and the downturn has hardly begun.

Now I do not think these economists in high places are all thick.
I believe they are financed and controlled by the global bankers of the NWO who wish to control all peoples.

The EU itself was a step in the direction of control. It was always obvious that countries as diverse as the North European and Mediterranean had little in common, climatically, geographically and socially apart from a common European heritage and can never work without a central undemocratic control of all aspects of civic and financial life.

They are now pushing for a closer integration. It is all part of a plan.
To help the plan along, mix the people up and "enrich" them with millions who have no cultural ties and who can move from country to country causing a loss of local identity making populations easier to control.
I believe it is no accident that the so called Arab Spring was in part begun by people's dis satisfaction with their lot and there is more to our intervention in Libya than is admitted.

Muslim extremists of course will try to exploit the vacuum in stable government and perhaps that explains the reluctance of Cameron et al to get involved in Syria.
Israel surrounded by muslim militants would be a nightmare for those in Israel complicit in this NWO scheme.

Now we come to a strange fact, the absence of groups such as the UAF and SWP in these protesting groups. It could be asked how these groups are funded and why Cameron and his cronies support the former?
You would think the SWP would have been at the forefront of demonstrations, given their leftist credentials.
These latter should not be confused with anarchists who reject any order and are thus diametrically opposite.

International bankers hedge fund managers and organisations such as the EU would be those one would think the so called leftist groups would be the first to target.
After all they are not democratic and there is talk of the "post democratic" society, in other words FASCIST.

Scare stories are beginning to be told that Europe would be at war in ten years if the Euro project failed. WHY?

We can all live peacefully together in our own communities, trading with each other in harmony when the people have a say in government in a true democratic way.

The horrors of the World Wars of the 20th Centuary were caused by corrupt leaders and WW2 was in effect a conflict between a free people aided and abetted by Stalin until Hitler attacked him when Stalin joined us.

Wars are not caused by the people, they are just cannon fodder, they are caused by the expansionist policies of dictatorships. The people of all races are being used. Even the unwanted immigrants now entering our country are tools in this global scheme,encouraged by our unrepresentitive government. and aided by their lackeys in the media.

FASCISM AND COMMUNISM ARE THE SAME, and our government is little different BUT

THE PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP to the frauds perpetrated on them.

Where it will end who knows, but hopefully with a more just system rather than the "Orwellian" one they wish to impose on us, and if it does it will be worth it.

HOW TO IMPROVE HOSPITALS

The disgraceful situations in our hospitals with patients being literally starved to death or left unattended in thier own faeces has shocked the nation.

To our shame two of the hospitals are local to us, Whiston and Ormskirk.
The usual excuse is "lessons will be learnt" is just not good enough. What lesson needs to be learnt that patients need good nutrition and the ability to get to it if bed ridden?
What lessons need to be learnt that patients often need to be taken to the toilet and not left in their own excrement?
What lesson needs to be learnt that a bit of compassion and privacy is needed for patients?

Now I am a bit ashamed about this as I did my medical housejobs at Whiston. Then it was old fashioned and of course lacked modern diagnostic equipment and patients were in large wards of thirty patients.
Then they were well nursed, even in the geriatric block housing altogether 180 patients all those patients were well looked after and measures to prevent pressure sores strictly observed.

What has gone wrong?
Well we all know that with the demise of the Matron standards have gone downhill and hospitals are run from the office.
We, doctors and nurses were in fear of the wrath of the matron and that ensured standards were high wards were clean and patients attended to.
There was no central station where all the qualified staff sat behind computers as they do now. The trained nurses were all on the ward observing the patients.
Possibly a cause of hospital acquired infections has something to do with the present slack standards.

I know nowadays boxes have to be ticked and reports made but if that is all nursing is about, why not just have an office and let the relatives do the work.

OH THAT IS THE LATEST SUGGESTION. Families coming into hospital to feed their sick relatives, presumably so that the nurses can remain behind their computers and tick all the boxes.

That is going to do wonders for infection control with many family members carrying who knows what infection into the wards each mealtime.

So what is to be done to ensure proper care? In the past hospitals have been fined, but that is just fining the taxpayer and denuding the hospital of funds.
Chief executives have been removed but given generous severance payments and pensions and sometimes been employed in other NHS establishments, but it seems this is to no avail.

I believe it rests with the boss. In the NHS the buck stops with no one.
In business if the boss makes mistakes it hits him in the pocket and can bankrupt him.

This is what should happen in hospitals (and councils).
There should a financial penalty for deficiencies, severe enough to ensure those in charge do what they should. They have remunerations far in excess of what they had in the past.
We should insist that they earn it and if they fail, hit them in the pocket.

SO TO SOLVE THESE PROBLEMS, MAKE SURE THE BUCK STOPS WITH THE BOSS.

P.S I don't know about the wards but the staff in outpatients at Wigan Infirmary could not be more helpful, a contrast with other establishments I have visited recently, but then they are Wiganers and we have avoided so far the worst hospital infection of all, multiculturalism.

I just wish they could improve car parking facilities.

CAMERON'S COMPASSION?

David Cameron in pledging a greater proportion of our GDP than any other country says he feels a warm satisfaction at the good this programme does in reducing poverty in the Third World.
He like Geldoff and Bono are good at encouraging people much poorer then they are to give money and in Cameron's case making it obligitory by spending our taxes on these worthy projects.
Our government of course is in debt and incurs more debt to assist these countries who often have a better bank balance than do we.

Now I do not agree with all this involuntary taxpayer largess but a quick look at the recipients shows clearly where Camerons preferences lie and his assessment of the relative importance of various human rights in his mind.

Thus until recently, China with a poor human rights record and many executions and political prisoners has been a recipient of our forced largesse as had India which posseses aircraft carriers which we can not afford. India has a wealthy upper class well able to financially to help the "Untouchables" who live in abject poverty. No discrimination there then.

Pakistan, a corrupt regime with a penchant for persecuting and even killing Christians receives masses of aid, well it's for the poor children you see.

Afghanistan with an even worse and corrupt regime consumes billions in aid. Well it's for the women's education you see. I know they behead infidels but you have to consider the poor children, and in any case it is their culture and we must not interfere.

Countries in Africa, notorious for torture and worse are helped. Yes we know they are corrupt and most of the money ends up in Swiss bank accounts but some does get through to the poor, helping to alleviate hunger.

So It's nice to know we are helping all contries to create a better life and save children from starvation even if little gets beyond the agencies organising it at least some does.

It must gladden his heart that we are helping mitigate child starvation in all these poor countries.
All the needy will be helped WON'T THEY.

WELL NO. Any country who locks up people with what they in their culture perceive as un natural sexual proclivities will get no aid from us. These people of minority sexual inclinations must be released immediately or no further aid will be given.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE STARVING CHILDREN? YOU ASK.

Sorry but their life and death does not matter as much as what is seen as a persecution of "gays"

So there you have it. Cameron's compassion.
Behead, torture, kill or steal form the poor and it will be ignored BUT, lock up a few homosexuals in your country and aid will be stopped AND YOUR CHILDREN DIE.

HOW COMPASSIONATE!
It just demonstrates the hold the "Gay" lobby has over the government.

Their rights are worth more than life and death, but then the coalition in is only helping its own containing as it does many Limp Dems, and we know what they are like don't we?

Manipulation Of Your Mind by Government Agenda - Brian Gerrish

PRESERVATION OF RARE BREEDS

There is a series on the increase in numbers of mixed race in Britain on the BBC of course headed by George Alligia a mixed race newsreader himself of course who can give his unbiassed views on the subject and help celebrate the rapidly increasing numbers of mixed race people as a proportion of the population.


What the programmes are about is in truth race replacement. This situation has been encouraged by various "liberal groups" in positions of influence and see in white Europeans as everything bad, in spite of our contribution to human knowledge. These people must be infused with new blood they say.
Hybrid vigour they say. The mixed race offspring are superior to the natives as a result of this genetic infusion they say.
In effect it is a process of eugenics perpetrated against the European people, which if it had been done the other way round would have been decried as Fascism, which of course it is.
But promoting white English people's loss of their genetic heritage will never be shown in these terms.
The insidious propaganda behind these programmes is that mixed race people are superior to pure white people.

Well I was a pedigree cattle breeder and know all about the dangers of inbreeding as a result.
Thus we were obliged to purchase a new bull (of the same breed of course) to avoid this often at great cost to ensure the right genetic material.
This bull would be put with cows also selected for their superior traits otherwise his value would have been wasted and the calves produced of poor quality.

Now I am not comparing people with cattle but the genetic imperatives are just the same.
The most usual infusion of new blood into our society is from a black man who has a child with one or many white slags, many of whom are members of the underclass and ugly or oversexed or they could have chosen a white man to father their child.
So what is the result. A combinationof their genetic characteristics. His athleticism rhythm and social irresponsibility but on average lack of brain power with hers, low inelligence and slothfulness. I am not saying all such mixtures will have exactly the same result but the general end result will be an increase in the population of violent unintelligent but physically strong people.

Lest this is thought a racist rant I do believe some new blood can be beneficial but in small amounts.
Thus peoples of the Middle East are generally intelligent even though they are often blighted in their own countries by their muslim creed. If they integrate here, leave islam and have a child with an English partner the result can be a genius such as the late Steve Jobs.
But how many mixed race people of African descent make a mark in the intellectual world? Not many.
Indians as well as Chinese are also clever and mixed race offspring often do well.
BUT we can not tolerate too many without losing our culture. If they lived here in small numbers we could just about tolerate the situation.
Pakistanis of course exhibit the opposite effect by cousin marriage causing a high proportion of genetic deformities.

Many, including Nick Griffin and television personalities support the preservation of rare breeds of domestic animals. Knowing little about livestock they do not realise the reason for that rarity. They breed and grow slowly and are out competed in one way or another.
Endangered species are also rightly protected. Remember the concern that the Ruddy Duck was interbreeding with native wild ducks and threatening their genetic purity. What happened? The interlopers were shot to preserve the native ducks, even though these species were closely related enough to interbreed
One endangered species whose extinction the media seem to welcome is the white Europeans and especially British people.
Does our genetic heritage not matter.? Are we less important than ducks? It seems so.

Why are we endangered? Because we are not producing as many children as the mixed races and muslims.
Humans like animals are subject to a Darwinian system and we are losing our race in more ways than one.
As a member of that increasingly threatened rare breed, a white Englishman I am determined to preserve our pure European pedigree, although too old to do it by breeding.
We are on the danger list. The media seem to welcome that.

WE MUST ACT TO PREVENT OUR EXTINCTION

SORRY ENGLISHMAN, A PICTURE.

Sorry Englishman for the absence of the picture of Haigh hall on a previous blog. Here is one of the hall itself.

It is set in a large area of parkland which extends to within a quarter mile of Wigan town centre and is a great asset to the town and it's people.

The hall itself looks well from the outside and in the front rooms which are used for receptions but the roof and rear behind the facade are in a shocking state of disrepair.

Wigan MBC has a history of cultural vandalism.

When, a few years ago when building a new shopping precinct they found a Roman bath house which they took to pieces and placed the remnants behind the new buildings.

These Roman buildings could have been preserved. Wigan could have used these as a tourist attraction "Visit Roman Wigan",(far better than Wigan Pier.

But then the people running the council, then and now are cultural illiterates and soon our ancient town will be merely a shopping clone of many other towns with a far less historic past.

We need councillors who take pride in and love our town rather than their pockets.

WILL WE GET THEM? MAYBE IN THE FUTURE BUT THEN IT WILL BE TOO LATE.

LIKE A CORNERED RAT

As I said yesterday I was disappointed at how little the Panorama programme exposed.
This programme was nothing to do with politics but was only concerned with allegations of financial misdemeanours. Thus any questions asked had a validity to the State and especially to members whose hard earned cash had been use to finance the party.

Mention of the massive amount of money that Jim Dowson has allegedly gathered for the Party was there, but no indication of how it was spent was elucidated, just a statement that the General Election cost it a lot of money.
How much? We have never been told.
Yes I know there were over 100 lost deposits which would have cost over £50,000 but what about the rest.
The local parties were billed and paid for their leaflets so where was the rest of this huge amount spent?

I agree with Simon Darby that the programme was a bit of a damp squib but why in that case were there six articles attacking the programme and the BBC for creating it?
If it had no effect and all the allegations wrong why keep going on about it.This obsession with a not very informative programme and their reaction to it tends to make me believe there is much more hidden under the carpet.

Perhaps some is sub judice, I expect there is and much more will be revealed later.
In that case the BBC in its mission to close down the Party(which I agree it has) has acted prematurely. Why I can only guess. Is it inefficiency or by design?
Only time will tell but one thing is certain Griffin is unsettled by it.

The truth will come out sooner or later but in the meantime Nationalists have to move the cause forward.

The politics of the BNP are broadly correct and more a reflection of member's opimions than those of any other party.

IT IS THE LEADERSHIP WHICH IS WRONG AND WHICH PUTS THE VOTERS OFF.

Nick Griffin must realise that HE IS NOT THE PARTY.The Party belongs to its members.
I wonder whether he will hang on in his bunker until the end as did Hitler in the hope of eventual victory.
If so he will find himself with a tiny rump of incompetents still believing as did Hitler in the bunker.

We nationalists must not allow him to take our movement down with him.
We must forge a new movement and unite with other patriots in honest and common cause to save our country, even if that means a new party amalgamated with other patriots.

It can be done.
IT MUST BE DONE.

I expect a start to be made next week at Andrew Brons's meeting. I hope so for all our sakes..

P S Do you know there is a clause in the BNP constitution that guarantees Nick Griffin a generous pension paid out of Party funds? It was pushed through by him at the EGM in Codnor three years ago.
If you have forgotten I bet he hasn't, but it's still there.

So the few of you who remain loyal to the man who has deceived you will find yourselves liable for another bill. Of course if there is no BNP where does the money come from?

I neither know nor care.
I just know I will not be paying it.

IT WILL BE YOU.

CRIMINAL NEGLECT

Now for some news of local incompetence.

Haigh Hall gifted to the then Wigan council by Lord Crawford and described as "The Jewel of The Town" with its attendant country park close to the town centre has been found to have a leaking roof.

Well that is a surprise. I went on a conducted tour of the building over ten years ago and was shocked by its condition.

The rooms open to the public seemed in good repair but the back of the building and the attics were in a state of disrepair.
The attic formerly housing the nursery room and servants quarters was a shambles. There were leaks in the roof, but they had at least put buckets under these leaks (big deal) and "acro" supports holding some of the joists up.

I asked why repairs could not be done and was told that a covenant prevented it as the building belonged to the people of Wigan.

One room at the back WAS used as a Social Services office as this was allowed as helping the people of Wigan though why a Portacabin in the town centre would not serve better I do not know.
The famous original staircase was decorated with posters warning of AIDS and other PC nonsense, given that few people would see them. For the "people of Wigan you see"

I wrote letters about this and I believe did an article on this blog about this degredation of our premier building but I heard nothing afterwards. I assumed the urgent and necessary repairs had been done.

Surprise, surprise, only a temporary fix had been done and the building is still at risk unless an estimated £2 million is spent.
Why is this still so? Why have the well remunerated councillors not insisted on the repairs before? or did they even know? Or care?
If they did not is that not a dereliction of duty.

If I knew about the state of the building all those years ago and I am not a councillor why did our councillors not know about our town's best building ?
This neglect of our heritage is nothing less than cultural vandalism and a disgrace to all involved.

Now I know that at a time of financial stringency cost is a problem, but it did not seem to be an insuperable problem for new offices for the overpaid and underworked staff of Wigan Metro which were erected recently.

I was further shocked to hear last night that the stables at the hall were in better shape having been equipped as offices replete with computers and other necessary equipment, for the Metro of course. A nice country setting for these "workers"
Another case of all talk and no action.

Some of the comments in the Evening Post have even suggested demolition.
I am appalled.

So go on Wigan Metro. Try for lottery money. Sack a few of your inspectors and diversity and equality officers (like Elliot? BTW have you not sacked him yet?).Pay your senior staff less. You can find the money if you want to.
How many hundreds of millions do you rake in in Council Tax? This is peanuts in comparison.
A project such as saving Haigh Hall would be doubly advantageous. It would save our heritage for future generations and give employment to the local building industry.

Wigan has suffered much in the past as its inhabitants toiled to play such a prominent part in our country's wealth.

Those parts unravaged by industry and their historic buildings MUST BE SAVED.
The wealth was syphoned out of our town in the past.

IT'S TIME TO GIVE A BIT BACK, YOU OWE IT US.

MUCH MORE TO UNEARTH

How convenient. The BNP website is off line following the Panorama programme.
I know it is a bit soon for a comment but the inability to get on the site is to say the least strange.
have they run away as Nick did in Leicester?
Having seen the programme I was a little disappointed at its shallowness. It did not unearth much that we did not already know, so why all the fuss about it on the official site?

It was said that donations reached record levels and so did expenditure, but no details of that expenditure were discovered.
I feel there is a lot more to it still hidden.

I am and always have been a nationalist but feel cheated in not being given the answers to valid questions of on what this vast amount of money was spent. Questioning the finances is not treachery, it is a reasonable request for answers which I had hoped the programme would have elucidated.
It did not. All it showed was a culture of misaccounting and possibe fraud but no clue as to where our money has gone.
Possibly criminal charges will be brought, I don't know but the members deserve to know where their money has gone.
None of it came to our group. We put far more in the kitty than we got out.

Unfortunately the image of the party and thus of nationalism was dragged down by the disgraceful tactics at the aborted interview in Leicester, especially when the reporters were ejected from the venue. Those involved looked like and acted like the thugs we are portrayed as and this is the image we must lose.
The venue incidentally was where our last conference was held.

I have to say that those who consented to be interviewed conducted themselves in exemplary fashion and would be an asset to any patriotic party( apart from the traitor Bennett). Of course they are not members of the BNP now although they formerly held senior positions before leaving in disgust.
Their politics I am sure remain the same but the party hierarchy has let them and our nation down and those remaining in the party showed their true calibre.

I feel it is a pity that Andrew Brons did not appear on the programme as he would have shown the real BNP and countered the uncouth attitude of those still loyal to Nick Griffin.

I can only hope for a more in depth scrutiny of the Party and its finances in the future.

Is this tame programme what they were frightened of?
If so there must be much more lieing under the carpet.

Let's put all this deceit and corruption behind us and work for a clean honest Nationalist grouping which unites all true Brits.

WE OWE IT TO OUR COUNTRY.

THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING.

As Winter approaches we look back to the barbecue summer due to global warming which confounded the "experts" by not turning up.

We can also celebrate "The Arab Spring" when the peoples of North Africa gained their freedom and could live in harmony, also predicted by the experts and supported by our government at a cost of billions in Libya.
It is wonderful to see the newly freed people of Tunisia enjoying their freedom by attempting to escape to Europe.
The harmony in Libya in those areas liberated fron Gadaffi gladdens ones heart and it must make Cameron proud that the captured soldiers are at last seeing the benefits of democracy.

Oh sorry there must have been a mistake. The sub Saharan Africans who fought for Gadaffi are not facing trial but murder by being shot if they are lucky and by torture and mutilation if they are not.
This is not racist of course, only whites can be racist.

Egypt, freed of Mubarak has settled down to peace and should have free elections where all races and religions are treated equally, provided they are muslims.
How lucky the Coptic Christians are to live in a predominently muslim society, the religion of peace whose adherents kill them and burn their churches with the connivance of the democratic military dictators.

I realise that Coptic Christianity was the original religion long before the armies of the religion of peace arrived, but turning the other cheek has really helped them and hastened their eradication. It shows their religion is "not fit for purpose" and must therefore be suppressed.

As he basks in the sucess of a well thought out policy Cameron would do well to observe the turmoil in other Middle East countries, favoured by islamic inhabitants and see how that knowledge could affect our country.

His party and the previous Labour Party have seeded our towns with rapidly growing areas, mini caliphates who represent the religion of peace and wish only to take over the rest of the country by peaceful means such as breeding.

If Cameron and his cronies just allow this to happen all will be peaceful and harmonious. He will of course have to silence those "bigots" who wish to retain their non peaceful democratic way of life by leafletting and doing table tops.
Perhaps these misguided people who foolishly resist will have to be peacefully deported or even executed.

But that is the penalty for resisting these peaceful follwers of the prophet what's his name? who can not be depicted in pictorial fashion.
He was brought up among camels in the desert and thus knew everything about camels and sand but little else, just the man to peacefully start a new religion by slaughtering others and just the man for God to talk to and make rules for us all.

The prophet and God have spoken and it is our duty to obey.

PEACE.

WHY IS NEW MONEY GOING TO THE BANKS?

Over the last few days I have been thinking about and reading in the papers about the latest 70 billion Quantitative Easing (printing of money) which has been decided by Mervyn King.

This amounts to over £1000 for every person in Britain. It is not extra money he has given us, it is a debt he has saddled us with. Most affected are those with private pension schemes which have seen their pensions fall by as much as thirty percent.
In effect their pensions have been stolen.

I accept something drastic has to be done to save our country and provide jobs and if some sacrifices MUST be made we will all have to accept them.

BUT it is the way the money will be introduced which I can not understand.
It will be all channelled through ,you guessed it the bankers who caused much of the problem in the past.

Why could this "new money" not be used to improve our infrastructure or lent directly by the government to small firms at low interest? We would then get some return on this "investment" and our sacrifices, increase employment and in the end get a return on that money.
Then perhaps it would be worth it but it seems this new money created out of thin air will just boost the bank's balance sheets and the bosses bonuses.

I accept I am not an economist but the results of our country being ruled at the whim of these "experts" have been little short of disasterous.
So I ask the question. Why can the money not be put directly into the economy, businesses and infrastructure etc?

Why do the banks need to be involved at all?

Perhaps there are government forces controlling us, our economy and prospects behind the scenes which act in their interests and not in the national interest. It seems so.

Can anybody who knows how the finance world works please enlighten me? because I can see no logic in the way they are conducting our economy and our country?

I do not understand it. Does anybody?

If you do please tell me.

A FINANCIAL LIFELINE?

Yet another attack on the BBC and Panorama features on the party website.
This is getting a bit repititious and boring.

BUT there may be a way of benefitting from the "lies" which we are told are to be broadcast.

We could do as others quoted in todays article on the website and SUE the BBC for defamation of persons in the Party.
As has been shown thousands of pounds have been paid out for false accusations and libels in the past and our Chairman could do the same.

Think what a case he could make when he refuted the lies that he believes will be told about him.

He of course will know this as a lawyer, and he has vast experience of lawcourts as Chairman of the Party.

I am sure he will relish the opportunity to take the BBC to the cleaners and will be waiting with eager anticipation for the programme.
When these lies are broadcast he will be on them like a ton of bricks and have them in court for thousands in damages.

Will this programme solve the party's financial problems? It could.

I HOPE SO.

A Conversation About Race.........Again.

The following documentary trailer has been shown before on this blog but is always worthy of viewing and recent post contributions on here has prompted me to show it again:

The film actually goes head to head with the taboo subject of racism and gets the white-liberal and Afro-American squirming when confronted with some interesting facts and figures:

Yes, it's an American film but all the characteristics of this film are identical to the issues we are confronted with here in the UK.



The full length version of the film can be viewed by clicking on the link: A Conversation About Race.

A SQUALID FUTURE?

Tonight I watched a programme on Channel Four about the conditions in South Africa "post democracy" presented by that good British man Krishnan Gurumurthy, or something like that.

I can well understand why he was sent to report on conditions as a white man would have been in fear of his life in the shanty towns he visited.

The appalling squalour of the shanty towns he visited with rubbish, open sewers everywhere was a demonstration of typical African life.

One may wonder with what these people would have made their rudimentary shelters of if corrugated iron had not been invented by a British man in the 1820s. Perhaps they would have lived in true native ethnic style in mud huts.
Given the channel it was on, and the presenter with sympathy to the people suffering, the level of corruption and danger to the inhabitants from violent burglary was horrendous.

One woman was even afraid to go to the toilet at night (although I would think a visit in the day would have been wished to be avoided).
Possibly too many Africans about, that was the danger. I'm sure the whites would not have dared to set foot in those slums.
There was blatant corruption in the allocation of houses and profiteering by political heavyweights formerly of the "democratic ANC"

There was also a noticeable absence of men and those who were still there seemed to have done little to improve their neighbourhood.

Squalid though it was townships such as this are ubiquitous all over Africa and are shown in adverts requesting donations for help.
Cameron pledges millions of our money (not his and he has plenty) to help these people.

A question.
Could all this squalour and poverty in a wealthy country blessed by gold diamonds and coal and good land not be in some little way be the fault of their inhabitants?

Could the poverty and squalour in ALL other African countries also richly endowed with natural resources, be in a small way the fault of the inhabitants? After all many of our financial woes are blamed on the native British people.

Yes these people are poor. So were our people 100 years ago and our housing poor (I notice the slum dwellers all had mobile phones) but our streets were not covered in rubbish and we had a semblence of order and progress.

We had local councils who organised the improvement of our communities.
Our bureaucracies, although not perfect were not riven by corruption and our forefathers built a better land for their descendants.

Now areas of our large cities are receeding into crime and antisocial behaviour where knife and gun crime are on the increase. Native British people have left these areas in the process known as "white flight"
These areas in the main are populated by people of African descent who have moved here for various legitimate or other reasons. They are "celebrated" by the proponents of "diversity" as bringing a"vibrancy" to our land.

Of course the origins and ethnic make up of these new colonisers of our cities have nothing to do with increased crime levels

OR HAVE THEY? Is it in the genes?
A cursory look at the worldwide statistics would suggest so.

IS THIS THE FUTURE WHICH BECKONS OUR DESCENDANTS?

A THREE ONE WIN FOR NICK

Nick, your obsession with the forthcoming Panorama is beginning to seem pathological.
Why not let it drop and see what they say?

Your letter to the BBC on today website was a very good letter and the best response so far to whatever accusations you think they may make.

You still concentrate on financial issues and other employment matters of which most people neither know nor care about.

BUT you did land some good knockout punches at the BBC regarding their bias and general promotion of alien inhabitants of our country while excluding the views of our party who represent the indiginous inhabitants.

Why did you not do this before?
Why did you react as if you were on the ropes?

We know the BBC are lefty multiculturalists. Everybody does.

They have the power and almost a monopoly. We will never compete with them by running away. If we do that they will portray us in an even worse light and we can do little about it.
We could have used them to our advantage, but can not do that if we don't talk to them.

It is time we stopped running away and proclaimed our beliefs with pride. That way we will gain the support we are now losing.

There is a hunger in the British people for a competent movement to represent them, and we are not now providing that vehicle.

"Operation Fightback"? At present it seems like operation running away.

Stand firm Nick. Answer the questions honestly and get a competent management and policy system in place and we and the country will back you.

But the organisation and methods will have to change.

I'll give you a three one on the letter to Mark Thompson of the BBC

Keep it up.

Now Foreign nationals are to be given some of the TOP POLICE JOBS in the name of DIVERSITY

"Bernard Hogan-Howe, the new Metropolitan Commissioner, said as many as one in 10 staff at inspector rank or above could be parachuted in.

He said women and those from ethnic minorities have achieved “far more and far more quickly” in other industries and indicated they should now be targeted and fast-tracked to make senior police ranks more representative.

High-flying police officers could also be allowed to leapfrog ranks to get to the top quicker, he said.

Mr Hogan-Howe also said that he is in talks with the Home Office and Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, in a bid to protect the Met from budget cuts before next year’s Olympics.

He repeated his pledge of a “total war” on crime and warned drug dealers to expect to have their “doors put in”

The police have long been criticised for a poor representation of women and ethnic minorities, and moves to boost diversity have often fallen short of targets.

In an interview with the Police Review magazine, published today, Mr Hogan-Howe suggested proposals to shake up traditional entry levels for the police could be used to improve diversity.

They would be brought in above the rank of constable and undergo fast-track training. He said: “I think there is some option for some of the people selected at middle and senior management to come from outside.

“I might take 10 per cent who, after two to three years’ training, are up to strength, and have an open mind about whether it is at inspector rank or superintendent.”

Asked if such a move would help diversity, he added: “I think so because, if you look at certain areas of society, women and black and ethnic minorities are over-represented. If you look at graduates, there are more women than men.

“In certain industries, women and ethnic minorities have achieved far more and far more quickly than in the police.

“If we are recruiting from that pool, we will have a lot more chance of being more representative of society.”

Mr Hogan-Howe disclosed that negotiations were under way to ensure that Met numbers were not hit before the 2012 Olympics.

Police forces are facing budget cuts of up to 20 per cent over the next four years with the heaviest falling in the first two years.

He said: “We are in discussions with Boris Johnson and Kit Malthouse, of the Metropolitan Police Authority, who are talking with the Home Office to see if we can maintain our police numbers for a longer period.”"

--------------------------------

You only need a different Skin Colour, be born abroad or a non NATIVE Brit and you can be responsible for attacking the INDIGENOUS POPULATION without fear or favour.

Who represents US the INDIGENOUS ENGLISH, IRISH, SCOTTISH and WELSH ?

NO ONE