TERRORISM ON PLANES.

So now we come to the end of the "Noughties" a decade characterised by massive immigration, unjust and illegal wars against muslim countries and terrorist attacks such as 9/11 , the London bombings and several failed aircraft destruction attempts.
Although many were killed in terrorist attacks many more were saved including those on the passenger plane on Chrismas Day. The lack of further carnage was more by good luck than anything else.


Although the casualty numbers in the decade were a lot less than could have been millions of people have been inconvenienced at airports by screening measures at great cost to the airlines.
It shows that terrorists can achieve much just by causing panic measures which cost our country and people greatly and even if there are relatively few deaths the terrorists have acheived one of their objects by terrorising people, hence the name.
The common denominator is that ALL TERRORISTS HAVE BEEN MUSLIMS.

How to stop this?

First stop pussyfooting around and segregate potential terrorists from those who do not pose a danger.
I think all plane passengers from muslim and African countries should fly on separate planes from ethnic British people, then the latter could board planes without exessive security and reduce time and costs.

I know muslims and Africans would say this is discriminatory but as ALL terrorist attempts have been carried out by muslims or afro converts to islam why should the police and airport authorities check little old ladies who are obviously no threat on the grounds of equality.
The danger threat is not equal. It comes only from muslim extremists so all muslims must remain under suspicion even though the majority are innocent.
I know they will complain about their human rights, but what about our right not to be checked and even then exposed to terrorist danger.

I would not feel safe to sit on a plane with a muslim dressed in arab garb or his wife covered in black AND I AM ENTITLED TO FEEL SAFE(my human rights)


Come to that I would not like to sit next to such people even thow I knew they were safe. That is another of my human rights, to chose my companions.
A plane full of Brits would cause me no fear and I would enjoy their company.
The authorities talk about "a war on terror". There is no such thing. Terror is an abstract concept which can not be fought, and thus the only way we can protect ourselves is to segregate those who past experience has shown to be potential terrorists.

Unless these bleeding heart human rights politicians are sidelined the situation will get worse, more lives will be lost and more inconvenience will be visited on obviously innocent travellers.

This of course is only the start and all the families of terrorists and their friends should be instantly deported and not kept at state expense as at present.


HAPPY NEW YEAR to you all and hoping for more progress next year.

BEST QUOTE OF 2009

.
BRAVO FOR SHERIFF JUDD.

POLK COUNTY FLORIDA SHERIFF GRADY JUDD

An illegal alien in Polk County Florida who got pulled over in a routine traffic stop ended up 'executing' the deputy who stopped him. The deputy was shot eight times, including once behind his right ear at close range. Another deputy was wounded and a police dog killed. A state wide manhunt ensued.

The murderer was found hiding in a wooded area with his gun. After he shot at them, SWAT team officers open fired and hit the guy 68 times.

Naturally, the liberal media went nuts and asked why they shot the poor undocumented immigrant 68 times.

Sheriff Grady Judd told the Orlando Sentinel:


“Because that's all the ammunition we had.”

 Well do we like that?  Or do we just like it?


Morg
.

NO COMMENT

.

Well, plenty actually, but I'd better not.

NEWSFLASH: There is currently a manhunt on in Finland for a Moslem who has just murdered three men and one woman in a shopping centre in Helsinki.

"Nothing to do with Islam" I suppose. Same old same old.



Morg
.

NOT OUR BUSINESS

The protest by Gordon Brown and the wooly Left over the execution of Akmal Shalik for drug smuggling show an arrogance which will obviously antagonise the Chinese.
He was an admitted drug smuggler and had violated Chinese law.
Chinese people are executed for drug smuggling so why should this man be spared because he was an EU citizen.


He was not British having been born in Pakistan, spent a lot of time in the USA and latterly in Poland.
Even his ex wife did not petition for him to be saved.
His so called medical condition was unremarked upon until he was caught.
China is a rapidly advancing populous country and wealthy. It does not take kindly to being told what to do. Yes it is a dictatorship and some freedoms are curtailed but in a country so large you need strong government or you get anarchy.


I went to China some years ago and felt safe. The people though not affluent were well fed and there was no squalour as one would find in Pakistan or India. I would not have felt safe in Pakistan and that is the difference. A strict law enforced without favour.
Barbarous as the death penalty is at least it does not involve beheading or a slow hanging as it does in muslim countries.
Crime is not tolerated and thus the people are safe and getting more prosperous instead of money being spent on expensive holiday camps called prisons.

Unusually for a BNP member I do not support the death penalty but I would rather face death in China then in a muslim country.
However even so this execution has nothing to do with us and the sooner the British government realises how weak it is and learns to keep its nose out of other countries affairs the better.

So in spite of my beliefs I don't regret this man's execution.

P S My alternative to execution would not be a holiday. Life would mean a life of hard labour in harsh conditions where convicts would work to make a profit for the prisons before they were fed like in the prisons still existing in Russia.
The body parts of suicide bombers would be fed to pigs thus denying them access to their 72 virgins in the afterlife.

FOREIGNERS THAT ARE NOT EUROPEAN ARE DIFFERENT.

.
That you are a member of the BNP means that you intuitively already know this. This is for the more intellectual amongst us - an explanation that doesn't rely on intuition. The site is probably worth bookmarking and searching.

http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2009/11/scientists-call-for-end-to-race-denial.html

Morg finds himself in some unusual places. Anyone want more from the unusual places he often finds himself? Please do say.

Morg
.

UPDATE

I'm a Welshman. My Taid (Grandfather) was a short dark wiry man. Married a well-built fair haired Welshwoman. My father and all his brothers were large fair blue-eyed men; of two sisters, one was like the brothers, one like her father. My father married a blue-eyed blonde-haired Lancashire woman. Those of you who know me - what does that make me? My brothers and sisters are all like me. Fascinating.

http://racialreality.110mb.com/britons.html

Read first.

Morg
.

CHURCHILL

According to the Harrow school, where he was a pupil, he was not exactly the brightest of people.

He knew right from wrong though:

"The truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it, ignorance may deride it, malice may distort it, but there it is."

W.S. Churchill, Speech in the House of Commons, May 1916

We in the BNP are perhaps the same.

Remember that when you come to vote. Our opponents in politics, and especially the media, may take the first threeviews and put us forward as such - but the final view is what we really are. WE ARE THE TRUTH. Try going by what we say rather than what our enemies say.

VOTE BNP.

Unless, of course, you really do want to lose your country and way of British life.

Morg
.

Morg
.

TAKE A BREAK AND PREPARE FOR EARLY ELECTION...

Lets take this opportunity to relax, reflect and recharge:

2010 promises to be a very, very busy year and a lot of hard work will be required!

Wishing you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

I raise a glass to you all - Thank you.

Cheers!

p.s. Lest We Forget.....

ANTHRAX-LACED HEROIN

.
You have to wonder about some - supposedly educated - people's grasp on reality:

Syed Ahmed, consultant in public health medicine, said: “I urge all drug-injecting heroin users to be extremely alert... "

All the best with that one sunshine ...


... and for once, such idiotic thinking is nothing to do with being a Muslim.


http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/breaking-news/deadly-anthrax-laced-heroin/story-e6freuyi-1225813538076

Morg
.

HAPPY CHRISTMAS

This last year has been very eventful and successful and we have made great progress by gaining a county councillor and an MEP in the North West and I like to think we in Wigan have played a part in this.

My thanks to all who have supported us by leafletting, letters, coming to meetings , spreading the word generally and of course visiting this blog.

We are MUCH stronger than we were a year ago and have many enquiries to follow up after New Year.

The leaflet shown on last night's blog will help us up our game and was a direct result of us having an MEP which allowed funds to be used to publicise the good work Nick is doing in the North West.

We go forward to capitalise on our success and bring our policies of sanity to the notice of an electorate increasingly disillusioned with the incompetence of the politics and corrupt politicians of the other parties.

We are the only hope for our country and are increasingly geting our message through in spite of the foreign big business controlled media and the snake like "Common Purpose" organisation which seeks to destroy us.

We are winning against all the odds and will continue to do so.

HAPPY CHRISTMAS TO YOU ALL.

WILL WE OR WON'T WE STAND?

It has been asked on this blog whether we will be standing candidates in the next General Election.
My opinion is that it is better to keep our opponents in the dark over our plans, even though our supporters may wish to know.
We may not stand at all or we may stand in all three constituencies. If we don't we will have given our opponents a lot of work countering a non existant threat from us. If we say we will stand we would give them more time to attack us and any possible candidates.

FOR NOW THEY MUST STAY IN THE DARK.


What I do know is that our party will have a strong presence in the North West.
We have had over 300,000 of the leaflets pictured below delivered to a cental depot for distribution round the North West. These will go out soon after the Christmas holidays and I think carry a strong and relevant message especially in a former mining and fishing region (and people who bemoan the demise of the British pub)

Nick Griffin takes his constituents seriously and follows up local concerns.
How many other NW MEPs can you name? How many have such a leaflet?

When this iniqitous ruling forbidding us to take on new members is lifted next month and we gain another 3000 members nationally our campaign will really take off.

We may have seemed a bit quiet in this area recently (for a variety of reasons) but we are still here getting stronger every day as the other parties show their true colours and people see the truth of our policies.

Next year we hit the ground running but whether we will be standing locally I will tell you later.

In the meantime show your friends the leaflet on this blog and see if they agree with our policies.

WHAT DO WE THIINK ? ...

... of this bollux?

Click on the link here: US SWINE FLU SPRAY PLANE SHOT DOWN IN CHINA

Absolutely anything that is anti-American will do for some people.

I'm a former servicaman who has had plenty to do with Americans. The only criticism I have of them is that they are too keen to please we Brits ...

Morg
..
.

RUCKUS AHOY - SEZ THE CAP'N

About Lanky's point about the planned televised debates between the three mainstream parties - the Liblabcon.

There's a site out there called 'Cranmer'. It is well and politely written and deals with the nexus between politics and religion - and believe it or not, I read it every day without fail. Here's Cranmer's take on the televised debates, and a very interesting take too:

Televised election debates will open the floodgates of litigation

There are pros and cons to this development, all of which are now a heated topic of fierce debate on all the political blogs.

But Cranmer is a little bemused.

In the United Kingdom, we have a party of government and an official opposition. The leader of one of these parties will be the next prime minister.

Nick Clegg may have produced the best Christmas card, but he does not have a cat in hell's chance of being the next prime minister.

So why is he granted three debates along with the Prime Minister and the Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition?

And since he has been granted such, why not the leaders of the DUP, the UUP, the SDLP, Plaid Cymru and the SNP?

Or Sinn Féin?

For they too will be contesting seats in their respective corners of the Kingdom.

And if these, why not UKIP, since they came a very respectable second in the recent Euro-elections?

And if UKIP, why not the Greens, since they also have councillors and assembly members?

And if the Greens, why not the BNP?

Or Respect?

And don't the English Democrats now have a mayor?

And what about the Independent Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern?

And are not José Manuel Barroso or His Excellency Herman Van Rompuy of rather more political significance than any of these minnows at the next general election?

What exactly are the broadcasting criteria for deciding which political leaders are granted the (bountiful) gift of airtime to espouse their policies to the electorate? There is no precedent; there are no statutory guidelines.

By including Nick Clegg, the broadcasters have now left themselves vulnerable to a series of legal challenges. And a protracted and diversionary judicial review of televised political debate in the UK is the last thing our democracy needs.

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/

Morg
.

WHY NO GRITTING?

Ok, for what it's worth, here's my best guess.

Councillors, Chief Executives etc do NOT like spending your money if it isn't on immigrants. So they've been listening to all the "Global Warming" tripe with enormous gratitude. The Met. Office says warm winter and they all sigh with relief - no need to spend that money preparing for winter. Same with the railways, airports everything.

However, I suspect that if a Paki complains he can't drive to the mosque, all hell will break loose. There'll be a daily dawn patrol of gritters keeping the roads passable ... well, the roads leading to the mosque anyway. That's the proper thing to spend YOUR money on.

How much of a bet does anyone want to lay that if questions are laid in the council chamber, the Met. Office forecasts are the excuse that will be used.

Morg
.

SNOW AND WHITEWASH

Yesterday and today I drove as usual from the Wigan area to Billinge. The roads under Wigan Metro were appalling and had not been gritted. As soon as I crossed the boundary into St Helens the roads had been gritted and were safe.
In the WEP there have been reports of no gritting all over the Wigan Metro area, and now a football match cancelled not because of the pitch conditions but the nearby roads.
I have never heard of this before and it is a disgrace to the town.

What do these overpaid executives think they are doing for their money?
They are too complacent and well in with the ruling Labour group, no doubt spending money thinking of schemes to stop the rise of the BNP as they did a few weeks ago.
If our councillors and MPs had done their job and sacked these jobsworths then perhaps there would have been no need for the BNP but this incompetence shows how much we are needed.

ON ANOTHER TOPIC.

The proposed television debate between the leaders of "The three big parties" may perhaps be interesting in exposing their collective weaknesses but it will not be democratic.
The debate will be in effect a party political broadcast for them even though it will show them up for being very little different.
But what about the other parties not just ours, Scot and Welsh Nat, Greens UKIP etc?
I have a feeling that the "Big Three" are afraid of the so called "minor" parties and their growing support and are staging the debate to ward off people voting for parties like ours.
The selected audience aspect of it ironic. You mean like the selected audience at Question Time? I don't think so. The three muppets will be allowed to speak unlike Nick Griffin.

I accept that there can be too many in a debate so how about a debate with UKIP the Scot and Welsh Nationalists and Nick Griffin?
Surely that would be more democratic.
The others are having three debates. One will do for us and be proportionate, after all these parties polled a large number of votes at the Euro elections.
That would really set the cat among the pigeons, but they would never do it as they fear the BNP and Nick Griffin especially and they would be right to, he would aniihilate them.

CARBON CREDIT SCAM

It has been alleged by "Climate Change" believers that opposition to the measures advocated is driven by self interest and big coal and oil companies, while those in favour are pure scientists with no axe to grind.

The truth is somewhat different.


In this exceptionally cold week after the Copenhagen Talks failure it seems everything is OK for those greedy parasites who seek to profit out of it.
The article above from The Mail on Sunday illustrates the point.
We are being charged through our utility bills and taxes with the money being creamed off by the City and foreign industrialists and Labour donors. Even the NHS has to pay £millions. Worse we are losing thousands of jobs as indicated in the article with the closure of the Corus steel plant in Redcar.


Thus the friends of Labour foreign industrialists and the friends of the Tories, City fat cats are methodically destroying our future.
Our delegates to this farce of a conference flew there (many by private jet) causing huge carbon emissions, a thing they said they wanted to prevent showing themselves to be hypocrits as well as traitors.
It is just an exercise in the move to world government and away from democracy.
Carbon trading will not reduce emissions by one ton, but even if they did it would be too high a price to pay here for such an uncertain science.

Global warming even if it were to occur would not adversely affect our country.
It is ironic that the coldest period in the Northern Hemisphere for many years started during the conference.

That is not to say I am against conservation but any taxes raised on fossil fuel consumption should be used to reduce our dependence here and not sent abroad. We should resurrect the coal industries and ignore these non scientists and student protestors.

Saved our financial system and now the world have you Gordon?

You must be joking!
And you wonder why few intelligent people believe you.

FOR BRITISH LADY - BY REQUEST

But nobody go making this a habit ...


To view in full screen click on the link: here

Tony Ward interviewed by BNPTV

Morg
.

ROLE REVERSAL?

 .
It really does sometimes appear as if the free/oppressed parts of the world are undergoing a role reversal.

Pravda, oh how we used to mock, but ...

Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of third worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check.

These measures have come in the form of Hate Crimes Laws. The laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Thus the Lords of Humanity have given themselves the power of God to know what is inside the hearts of men.

Read it all and wonder - this is coming out of RUSSIA?

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/111032-0/

Morg
.

COMMUNICATION BRAIN IMPLANTS

.
THE PATRIOTIC MICRO CHIP
is intended to be implanted in
terrorists.
 
The implant is specifically
designed to be injected
in the forehead.

When properly installed, it will
allow the one implanted, to speak
to God.

It comes in various sizes:

Morg

.

 

THE CLIMATE NEWS FROM RUSSIA

Hat tip to The Lunatic Arms

http://thelunaticarms.wordpress.com/2009/12/19/rt-news-nick-griffin-at-copenhagen/

Morg
.

DEMOCRACY AND ISLAM

George Handlery about the week that was. Searching for antidotes against the insolent disobedience of the restless masses. Pacify Islam: export secular atheism. Just discovered: Muslims are not responsible for the last two world wars. The devaluation of racism through over incantation. About the extent of Soviet infiltration.

1. The insurrection of the masses. Only one politically advanced industrialized society practices on a regular basis and within short intervals institutionalized direct democracy. Some evidence suggests that it is a better system than its missing global practice would suggest. The widespread representative system puts decisions in the hands of a political class. The insider crowd’s orientation and ability to sense issues that concern its people can be limited. When its ideology’s assumptions and reality diverge, it can even run contrary to what formal politics’ outsiders desire. 

[ ... ]

3. The inclination to react negatively to the demonstrative display of Muslim presence by some refugees is unmistakable. Combating the effect, instead of dealing with the cause, the invocation of the “racism” mantra brings diminishing returns. An added drawback is that genuine racism is trivialized and ultimately made acceptable by the inflationary use of the term. Once “racist” becomes a household word for nearly everything, the real racists will have it easy. The impositions and “territory marking” of made-visible Muslims and their comportment are not rejected because they come from aliens. Resistance is provoked for another reason. By the standards of the infidels to be converted, the system that expresses Islamist influence does not work “at home” and, furthermore, the life it promises is not worth living.

Not a long read this time:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4228 

Got to appreciate the Google advertising executives' sense of humour too.

Morg

.

GET YOUR EDUCATION HERE

.
" The Left’s strategy has not changed much since the 1930s. They push government spending ever higher, and then define budget deficits as the problem. When fiscal conservatives point out that the overspending causes the deficits, the Left labels that as extremist, supporting slavery and homicidal. When in power, the Left ratchets up the spending on its clients and picks the pockets of the productive citizens out of a faked concern for the “deficit gap.” 


The one rule is that expenditures are never reduced, except as a strategic ploy. If an emergency forces a reduction, what’s reduced is the police, the garbage pick-up, the libraries, but never the budget-busting public workers’ pension programs, or the legions of $150,000-a-year deputies of bureaucrat deputies, hired and retained through thick and thin to fulfill the Holy Grail of Body Snatcher creed: “balance” between competent straight white males and quadriplegic black Muslim lesbians. 

Ah yes - that'll be the task of all the Elliot Browns and other such "Diversity Co-ordinators" of various title, salary, and way shape and form.


But there comes a time when the spending is no longer an exercise in cynical egotism or delusional ‘social justice,’ but a deliberate battering ram with which to fell a nation and steal its future. ... "


[ ... ]

 ... “experts,” full of the particular arrogance of people who have read 10,000 books but never milked a cow.

[ ... ]


The fatal conceit of learned socialist bunglers is personified in Dr. – in history, of all things -- Gordon Brown. As the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, between 1999 and 2002 Brown sold 60% of Great Britain’s gold reserves at an average price of $276 an ounce. He had actually managed to drive the price to its lowest in 25 years, still called "Brown Bottom," by announcing his intentions in advance.

By 1 December 2009, gold had risen by 335% and stood at $1200 an ounce. And Dr. Brown, having managed to trash Great Britain in many other ways since, is now its Prime Minister.

Full of grandiose ideas to redeem whitey and uplift the world, among Brown’s other flashes of brilliance has been his effort to get the West’s then-solvent countries to give away much of their gold, via the IMF, to relieve Third World debt. Since this particular outflow to the Third World did not work out, Brown with other Labour leaders have since done their best to destroy Great Britain via a demographic inflow from the Third World.
The gross mismanagement of the West’s real assets by big business leaders has been far exceeded by the gross mismanagement of the West’s economies and societies by political leaders and bureaucrats. This starts with their Keynesian conviction that they know how to manage the economy. Friedrich von Hayek called it “the fatal conceit." The scope of this term ought to be enlarged to include also social capital, i.e. common ethnic roots, cultural consensus, shared norms of behavior and the resulting social trust – for these invaluable social assets have been similarly destroyed by the fatally mad ruling elites.



Ostensibly about America, but do read it all because every word applies here too. A long read, but very educational:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4226

Morg
.

LAZY TEACHERS AND HYPOCRITES

Isn't it pathetic. Hundreds of schools closed in the South because of snow preventing teachers getting in.
They don't need much of an excuse to stop work do they?
When I was at school in the old days (before "global warming") I don't remember schools closing for even one day.
I wonder what these teachers do while not at school because of the weather. Do they go to the supermarket?. Do they have the lights on?.
If so they are able to do this because others got off their backsides and went to work in the supermarkets and power stations.

My son in law drove 20 miles in Essex to get to his work on time at a supermarket, so that teachers who were prevented from getting to their work could shop.
No wonder our children are so ill educated by this example.
Airports were closed.

I note Copenhagen airport was not closed enabling private jets to land with their cargoes of rich hypocrits to land to dream up taxes to discourage ordinary people from flying.
There were thunderstorms in the South East caused by temperature inversion possibly as a result of hot air drifting over from Copenhagen whose airport remained open.


This conference will do nothing in spite of Gordon Brown who seeks to alter the climate by putting us deeper in debt just as he did with the financial system.
The conference is a farce and just an excuse to destroy our industry by putting costs on them and paying £billions to "poorer" countries, money we don't have.
We are borrowing money as is the USA. Why therefore give it to other countries who have shown their incompetence in the past by remaining poor while others have prospered.

WE ARE NOT A RICH COUNTRY. CHINA IS.

We will be poor in the future if thick Gordon keeps giving our money and assets away.

I note on BBC2 John Prescott is for us cutting emissions by 30%. How? That says it all. With top scientists like him need we say more?

Let's hope the conference fails. It will solve nothing at best and destroy our country at worst.

A LONG READ, WITH COMPLICATED STUFF IN IT ...

 ... and as such, I'm publishing it for Chris, in particular, to read:

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/pachauri_letter.pdf

It will, of course, be interesting to anyone else who wants to know more about the ongoing money rip-off climate scam. Thank goodness for the internet thingy eh? They have, actually, already started the moves to bring it under the same measure of ideological control as they have achieved over the mainstream media. We are going to have a fight on our hands. The excuse they will use is "to protect the children" in various ways. An attempt was made in the very early days of the internet to create a "Britain only" internal internet. Fortunately that got nowhere. We do have a banned list though, and anyone can find themselves on it at any time. What that'll mean is that you can still blog etc. but no one else can find you. So you don't know you're banned unless someone gets access to the list and finds their own site on it. The Danish and Australian banned lists are on WikiLeaks (I've seen them). Turned out that one of those on the Australian list was a common-or-garden dentist - who admitted wondering why he was getting no hits on his website.

Anyone got a link where I can find the British banned list?

Morg
.

I expect to do jail time, as a political prisoner, before I die.

Morg

ANYONE CARE TO SAY HE'S WRONG?

.


Morg

A HARD ONE THIS - FOR ME PERSONALLY, BUT ...

.
 ... these two brothers do not belong in jail (two-page report) ...:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6956044.ece

... even if they are Muslims.

I've lived in High Wycombe, and there are far too many there. But it's wrong to stitch them up like this. We'd whinge plenty if it was a couple of ours.

Morg
.

THE BETRAYAL OF OUR CHILDREN

The government has said that it will ring fence education spending in spite of the growing deficit.
No one could disagree with the importance of education but at present most of this money is being thrown away.
Why? Incompetent and lazy teachers.
I have two grandchildren at secondary school, one in the North and one down South.
The one down South has been encouraged to take "soft" subjects like catering as opposed to languages. His maths teaching has been woeful.
When my daughter complained last year about the poor maths teaching she was promised an improvement this year with a qualified maths teacher. This has not materialised and he is still poorly taught if taught at all.
The other one near here has been disadvantaged by her teacher in one subject being off sick for several weeks but not too sick to go out shopping etc and another teacher unable to control her class and breaking down in tears most lessons. Yet another is teaching a different subject to her own and I'm doubtful whether she is a qualified teacher at all or just an assistant.

Again improvement has been promised next year, but that will be too late.
Our children are being denied a future because of incompetent or lazy teachers who will possibly retire on a good pension with "stress" while the kids are left to make their way in the world with little education(the teachers at some schools even have a day off for Christmas shopping. Do they not have enough holidays as it is?)
The governments answer to this is to make the exams easier and to build new schools under PFI at great expense. Buildings do not make for better education, it is competent teachers who have their pupil's interests at heart.

The sensible answer is a four letter word. SACK for incompetents who can't teach. Alright the NUT would possibly call a strike. Let them, the kids are learning nothing in any case.
It is ironic that parents are prosecuted for failing to send their children to school but when these children go to school they are not taught.
We buy our kids education dearly through our taxes and are entitled to have them educated.
If we buy something from a shop we can get redress by law for faulty goods. The same should apply to education as it is much more important than mere goods.

Of course this does not trouble the "elite" as their kids don't have to suffer this neglect being privately educated. Our children will face an increasingly competitive world. Are they being educated as well as the Chinese? I think not. They deserve better.
Schools would also be better if they concentrated on TEACHING and not the various politically correct matters they are brainwashed with such as sex education, racism, homophobia and Islamophobia not to mention what to eat.

Consider this stupidity.
A teacher can be sacked for being a member of the BNP a legal party even if they do not mention it but can carry on blighting the children's futures at school until their (early) retirement even though THEY CAN'T TEACH.

THE NOBEL "PEACE" PRIZE

I like Barak Obama. He seems the best (of a bad bunch) of recent American presidents.
However to award him the Nobel peace prize within weeks of his inauguration and before he had time to do anything was like awarding somebody the winner's trophy in a race before the race had started.

No he was awarded the peace prize for being Black, nothing more.
Since then he has shown his peace credentials by sending 30,000 more troops to the illegal war in Afganistan.
Other recipients of this prestigious prize include the peaceful terrorist Nelson Mandela,(not just any peaceful terrorist but a BLACK peaceful terrorist)
Martin Luther King, not exactly whiter than white (excuse the pun) also received one as did the gun toting Yasser Arafat.

I wonder how long Tiger Woods will wait for his award for his work in uniting peoples of different races. Going on past experience not long.
Let's face it these "peace awards" are a farce, unlike the Nobel science awards. These latter seem largely deficient in black recipients. I wonder why.

Could it be that science is colour blind and Nobel prizes for this recognise brilliant original intellectual work rather than all this PC nonsense? Perhaps but wait until someone in the climate change lobby receives an award (they may already have done I don't know).
Then the once prestigious accolade will be really be devalued and shown to be like most awards nowadays, PC nonsence.

(Sir) Paul Mc Cartney anybody?

A FOOL OF A CHANCELLOR

If you tossed a coin there is a 50% chance of getting either heads or tails.
If the Labour government takes a decision there is a 100% chance of them getting it wrong.

The Chancellors budget statement yesterday was typical. Although we are borrowing more than at any time in our history he has done nothing to repair the finances.
To "ring fence" overseas aid when we have to borrow the money we donate is plain stupid.
To propose the majority of the cuts which will be necessary to be on capital expenditure such as roads and infrastructure and housing when these would give a return in the future on that expenditure is short sighted.

One suggestion is selling what is left of the "family silver" such as the Dartford crossing which has paid the debt off and is making a profit for the taxpayer is idiotic.
To propose cuts in the defense budget when his government is fighting illegal wars and our soldiers are ill equipped is criminal.
To increase National Insurance is a tax on jobs and will just keep unemployment high.
National Insurance for manufacturing industry should be cut drastically to encourage firms to take on labour.
A good candidate for savage cuts is the Equalities industry which has persecuted our party at great public expense.
The prosecution of two Christians for saying anti muslim things to an old fool who had converted and which was thrown out by the judge cost thousands. They tried to convict Nick Griffin a few years ago forthe same thing. It must cost £millions per year to attack free speech and appease muslims.
If we returned all the illegal immigrants immediately with no appeal and foreign criminals and their wives and families who had been given (wrongly) citizenship we would be a lot better off.


After all I had not noticed a national need for corner shop, kebab shop, Indian restaurant workers or taxi drivers, let alone the hundreds of thousands of mulim asylum seekers with large families who are milking the system.
Having done this we could reduce the cost of anti terrorism measures and empty many jail places.
If we did this, brought our soldiers home from illegal wars and left the EU we could pay all our bills and have a future as a stable country.

The future under this government (and the Tories would do the same) does not bear thinking about.

HARRY BROWN

 Just watched the film Harry Brown.

You can watch it on-line here:

http://www.watch-movies-online.tv/movies/harry_brown/

Recommended, and the first button works just fine, on that link. You don't have to download it.

Morg
.

HI DENNIS

Dennis doing his bit.

I hope Nick Griffin closes this claptout organisation as his number one priority.



Although i must admit it has a catchy P,C title. Who said some are more equal than others.


- dennis shambley, wigan England, 5/12/2009 7:15

And here's the article he was responding to:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233356/Equality-Human-Rights-Commission-Labour-stooges.html#ixzz0YoHNrmlS

Morg
.

DON'T GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT

The action by the Equalities Commission to force our party to change its constitution to allow ethnics to join is indicative of the fear our recent progress has engendered in the other parties who all support this vindictive action.

We will be forced to change our membership criteria or cease to exist as a party.
All of us are appalled at the injustice of this legislation which is obviously designed to attack our party and our rights alone. It does not apply to any of the thousands of organisations existing purely for ethnics. In other words it is specific to us and not universal as all laws should be.
The fact that it does not apply to ethnic organisations shows that "racism" is not the driving force. In any case how many ethnics would want to join a party whose ideology is contrary to theirs

The fascists of the other parties know we will have to accept it to be able to stand in future elections.
What they want is for the law to cause dissent in our ranks and indeed there are different views in the Party on how to tackle this assault on democracy. They want a split or implosion in our membership, destroying the Party with people leaving and moving to fringe parties who fight against each other.


THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT, the destruction of the BNP.

For the first time ever a nationalist party is becoming mainstream and a threat to the rotten established order.
We as nationalists are the only hope for our people and if we have to swallow a bitter pill to survive, then that is what we must do, for our unity is the only way to power, when we will reverse these injustices.
Nationalism is gaining in strength all over Europe and our time will come.

Our policies and ethos will remain the same and no doubt members will have to sign that they support the policies of the Party or be expelled.
Although there will be some mutterings I don't think there will be a major split in our ranks, indeed I forsee a major surge in membership and support.

But a split in nationalist ranks would be a disaster for us and the country at the very moment that we could take off.

WE MUST NOT GIVE THESE UNDEMOCRATIC FASCISTS WHAT THEY WANT.
We must bury our differences and speak with one voice.

OUR UNITY WILL BE OUR STRENGTH and we will advance to greater influence.

WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED and will continue our fight for our people and country.

MORG LIKES MULTICULTURALISM

I was born into a multicultural country, and I'd like it to stay that way.

It's all a matter of definitions though. The multiculturalism I have in mind consists of the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish cultures.

That's quite multicultural enough for me thank you very much; and for you too I shouldn't wonder.

We are all very close to having the same cultures anyway, and even though we have been united for hundreds of years now, we're still a bit iffy about each other. So how the hell do these stupid politicians think they can import millions of entirely alien people and expect us all to get on like a house on fire? And talking of houses on fire - I'm Welsh so I'm familiar with the concept. Oh yes indeedy. So I predict that there's a lot of that to come within all our cities. And it wont be the English, Welsh, Scots and Irish doing it to each other.

English, Welsh, Scots and Irish. Multiculturalism at its best. The REAL British.

Morg
.

A HOUSING POLICY CHANGE WHY?

The fact that we are are a small party can sometimes make us despondant. Persecuted by the media and the Tory backed communist UAF (why did they change their name from ANaL?) it is easy to believe that we have an impossible goal, but then little snippets of news come out.
I read in Simon Darby's blog where he quotes the Telegraph stating that local councils are to be given permission to give some priority to local residents in housing allocation.

Until now need has been the deciding factor so that when an immigrant family arrived in a district with perhaps 5 children they jumped the queue over those who had paid into the system and had waited years for adequate accomodation.
What has caused this drastic change of policy I wonder?

The explanation is unequivocal "The rise of the BNP" as stated by the minister. Labour is haemorrhaging votes to the BNP and it is frightening the Labour Party.
So, small as we are and lacking the backing of millionaires like the other parties we are making an impression and frightening them.
Former Labour voters are tired of being betrayed by the party they once thought represented their interests.
Former Tory voters and members are joining us, tired of the broken promise of a referendum on the EU and that party's support for the war in Afganistan etc etc.

What goes round comes round.
Many years ago I was elected to our local UDC on the platform that our area was being taken over by outsiders who ran the council under the "Ratepayer" banner.
I stood as Independent for the interests of the local (indigenous?) people and got 80% of the vote. The Ratepayer group never won a seat again.

I was asked to join the Labour Group next year and I did and became chairman of housing.
One of the complaints of local people was that people were coming from outside and jumping the council housing queue leaving locals having to wait for 14 years for a house.
I got that stopped in the now Labour controlled council (they did represent the people then) and unless a person had been born in the village they had to live here for 10 years before they joined the housing queue, at the bottom of course.
This meant that local families could stick together and the community sense was strengthened.

At the next election I again topped the poll. People seemed pleased with the arrangement.
Later the government made this system illegal as it was considered racist and unfair to newcomers.
BUT THE LOCAL VOTERS LIKED IT!

And Labour wonder why the BNP is taking support from them and why our sense of community is dying.
They seem to be taking a new tack because of their fear of us, but don't be deceived.
If the BNP were not there it would be business as usual with our people still at the back of the queue.
A BNP vote is still worth 10 times as much as a vote for any other party.

BUNGLING LEIGH MP ANDY "BURN EM' ALL" BURNHAM TIPPED AS BROWN'S SUCCESSOR?

Oh! How I laughed when I read this story on the Wigantoday website.

Our very own MP for Leigh Andy Burnham is being tipped to succeed Calamity Brown for the PM's job!

Mascara wearing Burnham the toffee nosed - bungling toffee man and one who purports to being a true Leyther, although the chap was brought up in upper class Cheshire:(not like most of us Lancastrians around here who were dragged up)! Is tipped to succeed Mr Brown!

I say, " bring it on" !

Here is the cretin just a few days ago, using his governments mind-control tactics to scaremonger the populace to the ever diminishing threat of the "Climate Change" syndrome. Surely only a fool and his dog can believe this ludicrous nonsense?

A VISIT TO THE HEART OF THE BEAST

Apologies for the absence of comment over the last few days. This was on account of a trip to Brussels on an official BNP trip to get a feel of the working of that undemocratic, unnecessary and expensive beast.

It was a tiring but worthwhile trip entailing only one night's sleep in 3 days.

Before we went to Brussels we visited the cemetries at Paschendale which commemorate the thousansds who died. The graves alone must cover 10 acres and the walls contain the names of 50,000 young lads slaughtered for what? The names on the gravestones brought a tear to my eyes, thinking of the mothers wives and chidren who lost their loved ones in this pointless war.

Soldiers from Lancashire regiments were prominent among the names and I thought of these poor lads from God's own county leaving to fight for what they had been told were their country's interests only to be mown down in this senseless slaughter.

Later after a short rest and meal we visited the Menin Gate where another 30,000 people were commemorated and the "Last Post" ceremony is still commemorated every night by British servicemen, a very moving occasion for all of us and pleasing to know their sacrifice has not been forgotten even after all these years.

I just hope their sacrifice has not been in vain but looking at our country now I wonder.

The names on the wall were overwhelminglyBritish and commonwealth people but to give them their due there were a few Indians who paid the ultimate price but these were outnumbered a thousand to one by British names.

The trip was an opportunity to meet with members from other areas and socialise with them which was very enjoyable, people from all over our country, united in love for country. The next day we visited the heart of the EU beast and were met by Andrew Brons who gave us a talk on the workings of the EU and giving examples of its undemocratic methods.

He explained that although we had only two members they had managed to make their presence felt by shrewd tactics and their ability to capitalise on the lazyness of EU members of other parties who often did not attend meetings. How he and Nick manage the schedule and keep in touch with their constituents I do not know, but they do which must be unique among other party's members.

They act as an irritant to the self centred "elite", a piece of grit in the oyster and have much more influence than their numbers would predict.

Nick appeared for a swift chat but had to rush off to speak against the "Climate Change expert" Paul Mc Cartney who we had seen entering the centre to give his views on the effects of eating meat on global warming (and no doubt promote the feminising soya based protein on which his late wife built a profitable business ). The fact that this non scientist was invited to address the EU Parliament shows how far from reality and sunk in mediocrity that organisation is. I trained in science and reckon I know a bit about it but I would not presume to advise him on song writing.

Why do these media stars imagine their views on scientific matters have any special credibility astounds me. They are so self important they do not realise the very limited knowledge. We did see a vegetarian Indian advocating that if his diet was adopted the world could feed 4 billion people extra. If he was so interested in the man made climate change theory he would have been better employed advocating population control for his country and Sir Paul would be better cutting down his own emissions by flying less. The general thrust seemed to be we forgo a beef buttie so that they can continue flying and breeding.

We had to miss seeing this rather pointless debate with, it seemed most of the delegates absent (in the overheated building) and go for lunch and then home.

Before we went there was time for a photo opportunity and a informative talk by Andrew where he explained the waste (and carbon emissions) in moving the Parliament to Strasbourg once a month to suit the French and the fuel used by flying delegates from all over Europe for often very brief meetings which solve nothing.

After a meal of fish and chips (not as good as my wife's) we boarded the coach for a 12 hour journey home.

Tired though we are our thanks go to those who organised the trip which has enabled us to see first hand the idiocy of the EU and the exraordinary amount of work Nick and Andrew do both in the Parliament and their arduous journeys there to make our case for a free and democratic country.

That they have the time and energy to come to our local events amazes me.

We are truly fortunate in having the interests of our Party and country served by these two titans of the political class.

WE'RE LED BY DONKEYS

I subscribe to an online email service. The service provider has said to me that he has the same attitude to information that I have - it doesn't matter how people get the information, just so long as they do get it (he said that as far as he's aware, I'm the only BNP person to be on his subscription list - and no, he is not one of our supporters).

It's called "Not Born Yesterday" (nby); and he said this means it is fine for me to re-post what he writes with appropriate accreditation. His name is John Ward and he was the original publisher of the story about McBroon taking serious anti-depression drugs. His writing appears occasionally in the msm. The following item is in the latest email I got today.

THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE IS HERE.

All those of you who know me are fully aware of my attitude towards Islam. This puts my attitude into writing far better than I'm able to do. I'm making no threat, but rather a prophecy when I say that war is coming, and if only our stupid elites weren't so blinded by their ideology they'd see it as clear as day.

Here's the web page that is associated with the email service. I recommend bookmarking, regular reading, and a root through the archives. This man may not be one of our supporters, but he's certainly a realist:

http://www.notbornyesterday.org/

The article (emphases mine):

The problem our leaders never foresaw is about to go ballistic. And they still don't get it.

Some thirty years ago I was trying to get a new ad agency off the ground with four partners. As always at this stage of a company's development, new business was paramount. So we were delighted when into our offices walked the marketing director of a large paperware company.

We got the business, and during a celebratory lunch soon afterwards (in those days, lunch was code for 'the rest of the day') the new client explained his view of the future. I can't remember why he chose to do this, although I recall very well thinking 'Oh my God, here we go'. But rather than talking about his vision of paperware in 1990, this chap treated us to a succinct and chilling prediction about expansionist Islam.

We all thought he was off his trolley to be honest. However, almost everything he said has come to pass. After 9/11, I began to take his outlook more seriously; today, I'm convinced he was absolutely right.

Islam's intolerance of other viewpoints is about to go head to head with intolerance of Islam. And this is happening on four fronts.

As we predicted here earlier this year (although far from exclusively) Iran has played the Atomic Energy Commission, the EU, the UN and Uncle Tom whatnot and all along - but in the end, not only told the infidel to stuff it, but also forged ahead with an expansionist uranium enrichment programme. This the Middle East nuclear dimension.

Dubai has as near as damn it reneged on its loan commitment, thus handing the trump cards to neighbouring Abu Dhabi. The latter will now become the dominant partner: and lest you're unsure about it, let me tell you that Abu Dhabi is considerably more Islamist than Dubai. This is the financial dimension.

In Switzerland, a right-wing law has unexpectedly won sweeping approval. It states categorically that no more minarets may be constructed in that country. In France, religious jewellery and burkhas are banned from educational establishments. In the Balkans, old emnities have been open sores for a decade or more. In the UK, research shows an increasing antipathy towards the Muslim minority. This is the Euro-backlash dimension.

And last but not least, among the NATO allies patience with Pakistan's yes-and-no approach to Al Q'eida has finally run out. There's no sign that Obama and Brown understand how stretched Pakistan is already: only signs that while more troops are being committed by these two bewildered men, from the other side of the mouth they talk about disengagement from the conflict. This is the military dimension. 

There is also a Chinese/African dimension, but this is (I suspect) further down the road. In the meantime, let's take each aspect of the existing problem in turn. 

In Tehran, Ahmadinnejad must know by now that, unlike Hitler, he won't be allowed to keep on pretending what a nice chap he is. Being intelligent but full of himself (and underestimating mixed signals from the West) he may not as yet know that retribution is coming. But there is a more than outside chance he fancies himself in the martyr role - only ultimately, using the nuclear solution to take the impure infidel with him. He must be destabilised and/or removed as a matter of great urgency.

When it comes to Dubai, for once Western business is genuinely between a rock and a hard place: we can't afford - morally or financially - to reward mendacity. But equally, we can't stand by as a rich Islamic State gets even richer by taking over. It goes without saying that - the quarterly results mentality now holding sway among the globalists - we will choose the former, easier way out. But we will be storing up problems for the future in the region: for Abu Dhabi will be more than happy to arm Islamists of every shape and hue.

The European dimension at first sight looks like little more than a long-awaited realisation by the West that (at least on home ground) the age of appeasement must end. It's what follows that worries me. Although I do not doubt that the mad folks would brand nby Islamaphobic, I have no phobia about Islam: rather, I have an awareness of Islam, and where its own blindness will lead. The Islamic reaction to being told they can't have all those religious rights after all will not be temperate - few Muslim reactions ever are. This will hand more votes to the BNP and other Parties of the Euro-Right: but it's what the poor working class will do of their own accord that should concern us. 

There is an elitist middle-class Left-leaning view that the downtrodden in society are noble - but stupid, and therefore open to the infernal arguments of those nasty racists. The poor are, in my experience, neither noble nor stupid: they know a threat when they see one, and they will show no mercy to those whom (they already feel) have enjoyed privileges at their expense.

The non-nuclear military dimension is the one that really worries me, because it is the area where we have given the most confusing signals to the Deluded Ones. From applauding televised confessions to emotional incontinence about those who have died, we have looked decadent - and yet at the same time, shown the awesome power of our misguided revenge. To the average Mid-Eastern Muslim, the US/EU/UK alliance probably comes across as a self-obsessed weakling given the power of Armageddon for his birthday by a false prophet. There are few spectres more effective than that at recruiting martyrs.

We in the UK are going to fail this last test, because in the age of easy solutions it seems almost 'a no-brainer' to simply retreat back behind our own borders - where a series of increasingly draconian anti-terrorist laws will remove the very libertarian democracy Islam wants to see the back of anyway.

The most newsworthy of these facets right now is the Dubai thing. If ever there was a situation where denial and lack of foresight clouded the issue for those intimately involved, then this is it. The Financial Times unconsciously gave this away when it wrote on the 27th November:

'As always, the problem in Dubai is that no one had all the facts, and perhaps some in the financial community had made all the wrong assumptions'

Right then, apart from making assumptions based on trusting the innately untrustworthy, where exactly did we go wrong here? In most circumstances it would be truly laughable; but in our current position, it will surely make a final, tragic showdown inevitable. 

Morg

.

THAT SWISS REFERENDUM

Do we all agree on congratulations to the Swiss for stopping the building of any more minarets? Would we like a similar referendum here? Would it produce the same result?

You betcha! ... AND WE ARE NOT ALONE

Approximately 75% of all European peoples polled feel the same. Look at the polling results.

I said it before a few posts back: if I was a Mohammedan, I'd give some serious thought to getting out of Britain and Europe while the getting is still good. Seems the whole of Europe has had it with Islam, not just us.

WE DON'T WANT IT HERE, same as the rest of Europe don't want it there.

But do we think the righteous will take the blindest bit of notice?

If you want change instead of the guff we've been hearing for years, vote BNP.

Morg
.

NOT MAD IN THE SLIGHTEST

.

PRESIDENT Obama last night unveiled plans to send an extra 30,000 troops to Afghanistan after confusing it with a country that is not completely insane.

Mr Obama insisted the troop surge would eliminate Al-Qaeda, Contain the Taleban and help Afghanistan achieve stability during a speech that, according to some analysts, suggests he may be insane too.


Roy Hobbs, professor of Afghan history at Reading University, said: "Mr Obama seems to think Afghanistan is a place where people will, if given the choice, behave normally. That would suggest some sort of chemical imbalance in his brain.


"What Afghanistan actually is, is a place where 50,000 different tribes all want to kill each other all the time and then feast on each other's testicles while killing anyone who gets in the way of their unquenchable desire to kill.


"Anyone left alive at the end of this process has to live in a mud hut eating their own shit and will be stoned to death for humming.


"Many people have asked why they do this and the answer always comes back the same - they're out of their fucking minds."


Professor Hobbs added: "Having devoted my career to studying Afghanistan, I am now absolutely certain we should construct a 50ft high wall around the place, wait until everyone's dead and then build some really nice, upmarket golf courses."


Omar Kalifi, a Taleban fighter in Helmand province, welcomed Mr Obama's announcement, adding, 'ALLAH! ALLAH! ALLAH! ALLAH' before sawing his own head off with a penknife.


His colleague, Mohammed Akra, picked up Mr Kalifi's severed head, attached a leather strap to it and is now wearing it as a hat.

Lifted wholesale from here.

Morg
.

FREEDOM R.I.P.

Well folks, it's December the first today, and as of one minute past midnight last night we ceased to exist as a free independent country. We are now legally just a collection of eight regions of Europe. So we members of the BNP are no longer members of the BNP because the 'British' bit no longer exists: technically we are not the British National Party, but rather the Eight Regions Of Europe National Party - or the EROENP, for short. How much do you like that then? Well, at least until they proscribe us, that is.


Wont be long before police are arresting people for making anti-EU statements, and handing them over to Euro-Fed police for transfer to the mainland for punishment (one thinks of Dachau). Our country has been stolen from us, and we just sat back and watched it happen.

You'll be sorrrreeeeeeee! And so will they!

Want to know some of the things you've lost? THEN READ THIS.  Extracts:

It is a notable theft and bears reporting. Many others have tried, and failed, to obtain police action. Politicians have been asked, and in turn, they have ignored our questions, and our documented demands that they cease and desist. Not surprising, when you learn that it is the politicians themselves that will aid and abet in the theft.

What will be taken?

A few small items. Items that we have had in our possession for around a thousand years. Antiques, then? Well, sort of. These particular ancient items are truly priceless. Countless numbers of people have died, have been imprisoned, and had their lives ruined in the obtaining and in the retaining of these precious items. We thought that they were safe, we thought we would keep them forever, but a group of mindless, thoughtless, greedy and inept people, charged with their safekeeping went to great lengths to ensure that the theft will take place.

Item 1.

Habeas corpus ad subjiciendum. Latin for "you may hold the body subject to examination". This undeniable right protects one from the state. Whilst it is in place, no-one can lock you away without having solid lawful reasons to do so. Today, if you believe that you have been incarcerated and no evidence supports that incarceration, you can demand a Writ of Habeas Corpus from the court. The court will then examine evidence that you should be gaoled, remanded, or sectioned. You might also be interested to learn that once habeas corpus is gone you can be incarcerated for up to eight months without charge.
 
Item 2.

Courts de jure. Latin for "courts by jury". Today we have some 70 courts in our land geared for jury trials. On Tuesday morning your right to be judged by a jury of your peers evaporates completely.

Item 3.

Innocent until proven guilty. On Tuesday morning we start playing a whole new game whereby you, the accused, are guilty until you can prove your innocence. Our age old method under Common Law is dumped without ceremony and we revert instead to a mix of Napoleonic and Roman Law.


Item 4.

Loss of sovereignty. We are an ancient civilisation. People inhabited this land thousands of years before the Egyptians issued the tenders for pyramid building. Countless lives have been lost defending our little island. It had been a mecca for those wanting to live unfettered lives. Until now.

Item 5.

Democracy. From the Greek demokratia-power to the people. The first democratically elected parliament was De Montforts in England in 1265. We shared this method of rule with others, and it spread. Many authoritarian systems have been toppled only to have democracy established. On Tuesday morning we give away this unique method of rule for an oligarchy. Mandarins in Europe are not elected. They are selected. No previous experience is required. Which is handy if you are a (well connected) imbecile. Fat salary, fat pension, fat chance of actually having to work for a living like the proles. Arguably, because of their vastly diminished responsibilities, we have no need for a parliament, no need of the traitorous monarch, and certainly no need to pay 646 goons and their back-room staff billions every year. Brussels will rule absolutely. They will waste our money with unimagined skill. Bye bye democracy. It was nice while it lasted.

Technically, in writing this anti-EU post I am committing a crime. See:


http://www.davekopel.org/Media/Mags/SilencingOppositionInTheEU.htm 

Although the Connolly case involved enforcement of an employment regulation against an E.U. employee, nothing in the opinion limits the court's rationale to this narrow context. Freedom of expression, the opinion argues, may be stifled if necessary for "the protection of the rights of others." And the "rights of others" include the "right" of the European Union to prevent damage to its own "image and reputation." The principle would certainly sustain a national government's law forbidding criticism of the European Union. Indeed, since the European Court of Justice can override national laws in order to enforce E.U. laws, the Connolly principle could conceivably be used to invalidate a nation's constitutional protection of free speech—at least where criticism of the European Union or other governments is involved.

In short, Connolly takes a major step toward reinstating the offense of seditious libel—that is, the crime of criticizing the government so as to injure its reputation.

Historically, the truth of the statement was no defense against the charge of seditious libel. Indeed, truthfulness harmed the government all the more.

Come and get me then! I promise I wont go quietly.

UPDATE: How do other Europeans think? This is from a Dutch site:


KLEIN VERZET 


Given that the Dutch voted a referendum majority against the Constitution, I think it fair to say this is a majority opinion in the Netherlands. 


So we are not alone. If anyone finds any similar links from other European sites, please post links in the comments.


Morg
.