A DIFFERENT NATIONALISM

During the last year the nationalist movement has become fragmented and now with the demise of the BNP as a credible political force we must ponder on what to do now.

The BNP has been ruined by incompetent management, internal arguments and too many gaffes.
Many members have left or been expelled and many of them have joined new splinter parties.It shows people's desperation to find a vehicle in which to express their views.
In addition many people in our country are increasingly worried about the change caused by the lax or intended immigration policies of the main parties.

So what is the way forward?

First I believe we must stop the arguments between the varying brands of nationalsm such as "ethno nationalism" or "civic" nationalism.

These titles may be important to us but they do not concern the voters and if they do they put them off voting for us.

ETHNONATIONALISM.

I think this term should be dropped as a policy.
Yes we all agree that it would be nice to go back 50 years when we were a homogenious people but that will never happen.
If we are to continue to stress this form of nationalism we will be tarred by the racist brush, a term which our people have been indoctrinated to believe is anathema.

If we continue along this path we will never gain power and lose all, our influence,society and country.

We have to make the best of a bad job.

CIVIC NATIONALISM.

I can not understand this term. There is no such thing. You can not as an alien become a British nationalist by virtue of a British passport.

Nationalism is a feeling of community and a belief in a certain way of life, a patriotism.
By definition (from the Latin "Patria" meaning native land)it is not acquired by obtaining a passport and citizenship. It is like the tribalism which the "lefties" consider so important in other countries.
People are tied to their kin all over the world. It is a natural instinct, and inimicable to multiculturalism which does not and never has existed.
People of different cultures and races may live side by side but they never in large numbers live together. Rather they live in ethnic or tribal ghettos not trusting those from neighbouring groups but living in good times in an uneasy truce.

I read in the paper today that many Libyans living in Manchester have gone "home" to fight for their tribes in that country showing where their allegiences lie. It certainly is not to Britain.

SO WHAT DO WE DO.

Politics is about image and I believe we can achieve our goals without mentioning ethno nationalism, thus deflecting the racist epithet directed against us by the media.

WE SHOULD CALL OURSELVES ECONOMIC NATIONALISTS.

Times may be harder for many but before long they will become considerably worse.
We should promote the economic aspects of our policies.

IMMIGRATION--- can't afford it. We are too crowded.
ASYLUM--- no such thing. They have crossed several countries to get here.
TRANSLATORS -- not needed. Not our problem.
LAWYERS,--- can't afford them
FOREIGN AID --can't afford it. Let China give. They are not in debt.
HUMAN RIGHTS ---only apply to British people.
ILLEGALS ALREADY HERE --send them back. If we can't put a camp on a Scottish island in the rain until they said where they came from. Why should they live in our big cities. Somalian refugees in Kenya don't live in Nairobi.
NO MORE GRANTING OF CITIZENSHIP --we can't afford the extra numbers.
NO JOBS GIVEN TO FOREIGNERS--- We cant afford to have British people on the dole.
STOP FAMILY ALLOWANCES FOR MORE THAN TWO CHILDREN to avoid overpopulation.
NO SOCIAL HOUSING FOR LEGAL IMMIGRANTS ALREADY HERE.---we have not enough housing for our own people.
REVOKE CITIZENSHIP FOR CRIMINAL LEGAL IMMIGRANTS ALREADY HERE and send them back with their families. We have enough home grown criminals and can not afford more.
STOP POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION--it's racist and un British
ABOLISH THE EQUALITIES COMMISSION--can't afford it.
CLAMP DOWN ON ISLAMIC ACTIVISM--not compatible with the British way of life.Can't afford it.
All this of course in addition to nationalist policies in industry, ownership EU policies and foreign wars.

These measures I think would stop the inevitable replacement of our people.
We could avoid the "racist" tag as they would apply to all equally.

Unfortunately I think we would have to accept those who have been here many years and are second generation, but they would have to show they adapted to our ways.

IN OTHER WORDS THEY WOULD HAVE TO SHOW THEIR ALLEGIENCE TO BRITAIN, as the price of us accepting them.

I believe it is is the only way to save our country.
We are where we are and if the above measures were enacted they would afford us a chance for our futures. I don't necessarily like it but facts are facts.

AND MOST IMPORTANT WE MUST UNITE ALL NATIONALSTS IN ONE PARTY,and portray ourselves as a defensive movement, which in effect we are.

IT'S NO GOOD BEING A PURIST AND LOSING, WE MUST BE RATIONAL AND WIN.

BUT WE MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT.

The next years will be hard for our people and hit them in their pockets.

WE MUST SHOW WEARE ON THEIR SIDE AND WILL DEFEND THEM and

THEY WILL VOTE FOR US.

THE SCIENTISTS? OF GLOBAL WARMING.

This week we have been honoured by the great climate change/global warming expert Dr Rajendra Pachuri. He FLEW in to among other things to be delicately interviewed by the BBC and other organisations to answer questions re the falsified evidence of Global Warming such as the retreat of Himalayan glaciers (not true) and the alteration of data to prove the AGW theory.

The irony of FLYING round the world to prove this increasingly discredited theory is perhaps lost on him. After all he is a railway engineer and he must think that makes him an expert on environmental matters.

Also this week I read that a Mr (or Monseur?) Monnet has been suspended from his job in the climate change industry. He has been found exterpolating global changes from casual observations.

This scientist? flew over a part of the Arctic Ocean and saw four dead polar bears floating. From this observation he calculated that there was proof of global warming and an imminent extinction of that species.

He did not take into account that the polar bear populations have greatly increased.
NO he had seen four dead polar bears, which died from unknown causes and took it to mean that an environmentally disasterous global warming episode was imminent.

His cause was taken up by the great global warming crusader Al Gore,(what are his scientific credentials?) who has made millions out of the campaign.

These millions have enabled him to build himself a luxurious seaside house in the Carolinas. Strange that if global warming and sea rises are so imminent that he would decide to build at the side of the sea.

He obviously knows things we don't.

He has possibly seen the data from NASA that the CO2 in the atmosphere does not trap as much heat as previously thought.

Now back to Dr Pachuri.
I was privelidged? to see him share the podium in Brussels with that well known scientific expert Sir Paul McCartney who had FLOWN in to promote his vegetarian philosophy in order to cut emissions emitted by animals.

We have our "experts" in government also.
Chris Huhne, he of the speeding points shambles (high spped driving uses more fuel) FLEW to a conerence in Cancun last year to think of ways of preventing excessive flying, preferably by higher taxes.

A week later after coming home he took his attractive (there's no explanation for taste) ex lesbian partner back to the Carribean for a well deserved holiday.

Two trans Atlantic return trips for Mr Huhne

More recently he has been instrumental in subsidising "renewable energy" with money raised from increasing electricity prices which could cause death from hypothermia in winter.

In addition the Carbon Credit scam has put our industry at a disadvantage in respect to countries such as Dr Pachuri's India and caused the loss of among other things the Redcar steel works.

Possibly they have some connections to the Carbon Trading industry, I don't know.
What I do know is that it is having a devastating effect on our beleaguered industries, but no matter their wealth does not depend on that.

How fortunate we are to have these hypocritical "experts" (not a scientist among them) to fly all over the world to think of ways to stop us flying and heating our homes.

It would be poetic justice if these wealthy people were made to live with the consequences of their arrogance and ignorance.

It would be nice to bring them down to earth from their private jets.

BRITISH JUSTICE?

It is becoming ever more evident that the running of the recent leadership election was flawed and in some cases fraudulent.

Voting members were not sent voting forms to my knowledge by the membership secretary Mrs Mathys. There may have been a valid reason for this such as the incompetence for which she is well known.

There was also a climate of fear among the more timid members when they realised that they and the way they voted could be easily ascertained with sanctions implemented against them. This means to me that they would have voted Brons if they had dared.
I do not know what sanctions they feared, but it does show a climate of fear entirely inappropriate in a political party.

Suspensions and expulsions also helped the "Griffinite" side, and Eddy Butler did the Brons cause no good by encouraging members to leave the party.

Eddy on his blog of yesterday is thus disingenuous by saying he held fire in order to avoid hurting the Brons campaign.
He also says the BNP is a toxic brand but yet he attempted to lead it last year, raher a contradiction I think, and not what he said at the meeting in Dewsbury which I attended and which got me in trouble earlier this year.

He tells us what he now thinks is wrong with the party and in a future post he will inform us of his answers. It's getting like an Agatha Christie plot, hopefully with no murder later in the story.

It is always interesting to read these blogs and sometimes they throw a new aspect one has not thought of before, even though there is sometimes much to disagree with.

I WILL NOW SAY WHY I HAVE LOST FAITH WITH THE PRESENT SET UP.

I have been a member for nearly 9 years and know about "The Decembrists" incident.
There was fault on both sides. It was started by Nick Griffin and one thing led to another with attack and counter attack until the inexcusible "nuclear" option of the membership leak occurred,causing much damage to our party and some members.

I don't want to go into all the details, suffice it to say I know all of them.

The point I make is it could have been avoided with sense on BOTH sides.

So the rebels fell by the wayside and though wounded we got back to business and put the incident out of our mind, and began to make good progress.
We were on a roll, but a series of gaffes exploited by a hostile press undermined our image and political progress.
Again these could have been avoided. We supplied the ammunition.

Internally hints of financial irregularity surfaced and the party became involved in unneccessary legal cases at further cost. Accounts were submitted late and bills not paid.
We asked for financial transparency but were not given it, but I hung on in spite of ever poorer electoral results, hoping for a turnround and a revival.

I PUT MY DOUBTS BEHIND ME especially as Nick Griffin had PROMISED to retire from the leadership in 2014 with the generous pension he sneaked through at the Codnor meeting.

I was uneasy at the conference when he said that he would offer 20% payment of all bills owing, take it or leave it.
I thought it unfair to the small businessmen who had helped us to be treated so shabbily, especially as the party had crowed that we had had £1.6 million in donations.

We asked where the money had gone. Just give us the accounts, all to no avail.

Even then I was a supporter of the leadership, I had nowhere else to go.

At the conference last December a motion for a democratic structure taking power back from the Chairman and put forward by Arthur Kemp was almost unanimously passed.

Clive Jefferson was one of the few who opposed it.

I knew it would take some time (possibly 2/3 months) to be implemented, but when I found out in February that it would not come to pass because of objections from the Chairman that was the last straw for me. It was what finally removed the blinkers from my eyes and I began to search other avenues.

All this time our region was collapsing under the dictatorial methods of Clive Jefferson and I realised that to carry on in the same way we risked oblivion.

Then we learnt that Nick ("in response to popular demand", don't make me laugh) had decided to go for another term, this time for 4 years, an idea that was explicitly rejected at Codnor 3 years ago (before the era of proxy votes)

Nationalism is the only hope for our country but I believe we are failing to engage the voters because of wrong tactics, emphasis and those who are implementing them.

Internal party finances and democracy are matters of little consequence to the voting public but deficiencies in these have had a devastating effect on activist morale. It is no good pretending all is well when it is obvious we are going downhill.

We must change our methods, internally and externally and perhaps senior personnel if we are to survive.

WE CAN AND WILL SURVIVE as a movement,but--

We I think will have to change our name.

How about BRITISH JUSTICE?

A BLUEPRINT FOR THE FUTURE?

There is a proposal in yesterday's "British National Party ideas" fo a "Think Tank" to discuss ways of going forward from here.

BTW I believe this site is excellent and would commend everybody to visit it rather than the official site as the articles cover a wider range of topics and are better thought out and written, not surprising considering the calibre of those still "on side" with Nick Griffin.

I, like many others have been wondering what we could do to improve our chances, and having dwelt on this topic have become increasingly optimistic that the prospect of a nationalist revival is possible if we do the right things.

But first we have to consider why we are where we are.

Yes I know we have been in recent weeks preoccupied by our own in party matters and conflict, but we perhaps have forgotten the momentous national and international events taking place.
I have been following these in the last two days in the papers comments section especially following the horrific murders in Norway supposedly, in that madman's idea to protect European civilisation.

The media especially the left wing papers and the BBC have endeavoured to pin this outrage on us and our party. What struck me was the overwhelming majority of the thousands of comments which expressed the fear that Europe is becoming taken over by muslim people and are thus potential supporters of ours.

So why have we not harvested that support?

The answers are that we are perceived as too extreme by voters and internally we are concentrating on the wrong things.

WE spend too much time on semantics, Civic Nationalism versus Ethno Nationalism for example.
We are all Nationalists as are many of our compatriots so we should stress that unity.
I am neither. I am an Economic Nationalist and believe all will fall into place as a result of nationalistic economic policies, but again these details are irrelevant if we are to unite as a force for good in our nation.

Most people from all parties are against further immigration so we should promote that part of our policies without bothering about the details.

When you are in a hole, first stop digging rather than discussing which spade to use.

The campaigns the party has mounted, although on serious matters are of little significance in the larger picture. Yes muslim grooming is horrific and all are agreed on this, but putting a large part of our resources into campaigns such as this gain few votes.
Similarly the incompetently run "Bring our Boys Home" petition does not differntiate us enough from other parties, nor does the halal meat campaign gain us many votes.

We should as nationalists keep our noses out of the Israel/ Palestine conflict, again, it has nothing to do with us and gains us few votes.

Inteperate comments about Jews and executing our present politicians just puts people off and invites comparison to totalitarian regimes such as the Nazis and Stalinist Communists.

These attitudes have tainted people's image of nationalism, giving the impression of nasty vindictive attitudes.

Instead we should be pointing out that countries, often nominally Communist such as China are Nationalist, and that Nationalism has been an ingredient in their success. Nationalism has been successful in Japan and other Far East countries and even Germany where people and governments support their own economies.
Indeed every successful country in the world has gained that success as a result of a nationalist ideology.

We must promote the positive aspects of Nationalism and counter the negative connotations that word brings in our society,but we must do it in a form that is not and does not look extreme but rather a unifying philosophy which protects us rather than discriminates against others.

There are many ways we could effect this.
The phone hacking scandal has not yet run its course but even now both major parties have been shown to be mired in corruption and in hock to a ruthless foreigner who has in effect taken over our government.

The incompetence of our government is daily shown and many of its most stupid actions have only been taken after consulting Murdoch, such as the war in Iraq.
Now we are bogged down in Libya, again sticking our noses where they have no business to be.

More dangerous than all the above however but swept under the table by the capitalist banking cabal is the imminent collapse of the Euro and the American Dollar.
Chickens really are coming home to roost and economic disaster looms as countries attempt to pay interest to the international bankers on money they have created out of thin air to lend at high rates of interest.This money can only be repaid by continuing to grow the economy.

Any fool can see that in a finite world growth can not continue for ever but the powers that be continue on this path to disaster as they are financed by this fraud.

While we have been preoccupied with our internal matters international events have been to some extent under our radar.

SO WHAT DO WE DO?

Well I think a "think tank" meeting for disaffected members, past and present together with other concerned people should be set up. A new party could be set up, free from the toxicity of the Griffinite BNP which could bind all the various strands of nationalism under a common banner.

WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE?

Yes I think so, and quite easily.In every area there are people who have left the party disillusioned with the leadership and others who have been expelled.There are in all areas nuclei around which we could build on the hunger for a nationalist party which is evident in the comments to papers AND WHICH WE HAVE NOT TAPPED.

WOULD WE BE TAINTED BY OUR ASSOCIATION WITH THE GRIFFINITE BNP?

No. The fact that we have left in disgust or been expelled would be a point in our favour in public perception.We could use this to our advantage portraying us as a clean honest party whose members had the courage of their convictions to leave the old one . We could show ourselves to have been the victims of a con trick to our cost and distance ourselves from the chicanery and extremism of the present party.

The leadership contest has had a cathartic effect I believe in halting our downward spiral.It has concentrated minds. It has sifted those who wish to carry on in the Griffinite mould from those who have seen the light, sometimes belatedly.

If a new clean party is formed, purged of staunch Griffinites, the members could use their past membership of the BNP as a badge of honour showing that they had seen the light and rejected factionalism, financial irregularities, incompetence and extremism.
Remember the people who supported Brons are the intellectuals in the present party.
A new party would have a ready made management team.

IT WOULD NOT COST MUCH.

We are not responsible for Griffin's debts, so we could start with a clean sheet in more ways than one.

WE OWE IT TO OUR COUNTRY.

There is a rich seam of Nationalist support out there.

WE MUST MINE IT! IT CAN BE DONE.

FOR BRITAIN'S SAKE- TAKE A SHOWER

I note with interest the estimate of our GDP published yesterday, but I am still mystified by the assumptions made in calculating it.

It states that manufacturing output went down in December,owing to the bad weather which hindered transport and geting to work. I can understand that. Output down because of the cold weather.

It also states that because of a warm April figures are also lower than expected.
Manufacturing down again of course but this drop is often nullified by other factors.

Because of the warmth ,electricity and gas consumption was down thus lowering the figures.
Now this I can not understand as I always thought the use of electricity was consumption, not production.

Does it mean that I am to blame for not taking enough showers or flushing the toilet as much? It seems so.

Am I to blame because I have not spent as much or avoided a parking ticket or fine.?
All these aspects it seems are taken into consideration when collating the figures.
Issuing tickets and box ticking are all counted.

Spending mainly on imported goods, even if distributed and sold in this country is not production it is expenditure but the way they are compiled seem to be as important as manufacturing in the statistics.

We are told by "the experts" we must save more while spending more (mainly on imported goods).

Do they know something we do not know? I doubt it. They are just incompetent at their job of running a successful economy while feathering their own nests at our expense.

It demonstrates what is wrong with our economic model by classing consumption and pointless activities as production.

Until we have a more realistic system of valuing activities we will continue our downward economic path.

The s**t will hit the fan and our party must unite and provide the answers instead of concentrating on issues with which most people agree.

BUT in an effort to help the present situation and our economy I will finish this blog, go to the bog and use a bit more electricity by having the shower I have too long delayed.

Oh, and while I do so I will leave this computer on and switch the lights on.

Hopefully I will have an even bigger electricity bill next time reflecting my contribution to our national prosperity, even though I will make myself poorer by doing so.

THE CHAIRMAN IS NOT THE PARTY

With the disappointment of yesterday's result and having had time to reflect, all people who backed Brons must be wondering "what now?"

I see Griffin says he had before the election, promised to offer the hand of friendship to those who opposed him, expecting an easy win instead of just scraping in.

He says those who remain disaffected and trouble causers will be cast aside as there is much work to be done.
Does that mean anyone who questions his already failed tactics will be expelled? If so he is reminiscent of a modern day Stalin who does not tolerate different opinions.

He talks of building power. That is the trouble. We have under his leadership lost power and influence as has been written about in the national press.
IT HAPPENED ON HIS WATCH!

He is campaigning for a referendum on EU membership. Most people want that so how are we different?
"Bring our boys Home". Most people are against foreign wars so that campaign does not differentiate us. BTW when are the next 10,000 petitions to be handed in which were too bulky to carry at the last publicised meeting?

No I do not think he is offering the hand of friendship. He is resuming his role as a dictator especially when he threatens doubters with exclusion.

He is an intelligent man and must realise his most effective and intelligent comrades have deserted him, thus his sabre rattling.

For all his talk he is a wounded beast.

Today I have heard of many in our group who are throwing the towel in and leaving the party or at least activism and I am sure this will be replicated across the country.

To quote "a week in politics is a long time" and I would concur with John Bean (a true nationalist if ever there was one) who advises members in a letter to "BNP Ideas" to give it another three months before making any decision.
There are many problems facing the present leadership and we don't as yet know the outcome.

I shall continue my blog, criticising or praising as I see fit as is my democratic right.
I SHALL ALWAYS REMAIN A NATIONALIST who is in it for my country, to give to the cause, not to take.
If by my independence I cause sanctions to be instigated against me I shall continue with my blog to snap at the heels of those who in my opinion are letting our cause down by incompetence or financial chicanery as I am sure will others.

I had hoped for a more emollient piece from our leader and a sign that he really wanted unity.

Reading his first article it seems he has not learned the lesson of his near defeat, and he risks losing a large part of the now reduced membership over which he has presided.

FOR THE SAKE OF THE PARTY AND THE NATIONALIST CAUSE, he must be more accomodating and realise that the election has shown that--
HE IS NOT THE PARTY.

A CLOSE RUN THING

So the result of the leadership election and Nick Griffin has won by 9 votes.

So near and yet so far.

I must say I had not expected Andrew Brons to have managed to get so close to overturning the present dictatorship and neither I think did Nick Griffin.

However we must respect the democratic will of members however much it pains us.
The tragedy is that many, possibly hundreds of our best nationalists have given up on the party and their absence from our electorate has gifted Griffin this win.

THE QUALITY HAS LEFT THE PARTY, and it will not survive without them.

It means that the majority of nationalists in and out of the party would prefer a new leader and the fact that Griffin has won (this time fairly) means that our patriotic party remains split and impotent.

We still need find a way to unite and put away past differences if we are to get anywhere and the result means that outcome unlikely.

So what do we do? I don't really know.
I do know both sides are stubbornly intransigent and will not accept the other.

Will Nick Griffin accept that the majority of nationalists are against him? I doubt it.
Will those good people expelled rejoin if allowed under Griffin? No.

What is needed is for people's heads to be banged together to make them realise the cause is more important than any clique or person.

Possibly, just possibly sense will prevail, but I do not hold out much hope.

I can only wait for others ideas on what to do and pray for an answer.

THE DIE IS CAST.

So the day of destiny is tomorrow when the votes in the leadership election will be counted.

In recent weeks we have seen that the majority of the most respected members of the BNP have seen the need for change.
The only ones favouring Griffin are the armchair members who have little knowledge of the leader's machinations,a few activists who although hard working cannot see they are being taken for a ride and the cohort of recently joined members whose position depends on Griffin's survival.

Nick Griffin will probably win. He has seen to that, but that will be the end of the party as a credible force in British politics.

BUT WILL HE WIN THE HEARTS OF THE BRITISH ELECTORATE?
I doubt it.

He has been slow to condemn the Norwegian atrocities (has he has done so yet?) and thus has given an open goal to those who wish to taint nationalists as murderers.

Andrew was one of the first to condemn the killings, demonstrating his humanity and political nous.

If he wins there will be a mass exodus of the "quality" members, either by resignation or expulsion, and the party will be left with a small rump of second rate members still enthralled by his oratory but failing to see he is leading them down a blind alley.

Anybody who still believes in Nick after all his mistakes in throwing away the golden opportunity we had as a party is either politically naive or working for him.

If Andrew Brons wins we have just a chance that we can resurrect the party in an image more acceptible to the electorate and more democratic to its membership. It would give nationalists the opportunity to reunite as a cohesive and increasingly influential political presence.

If Andrew loses and Nick wins the cause of nationalism and possibly the fate of our nation will be set back years.

TRUE PATRIOTS CAN ONLY HOPE THAT THE ORDINARY MEMBERS CAN SEE THE LIGHT.

WE WAIT WITH BATED BREATH.

NOT THE ACTIONS OF A NATIONALIST

The horrific bonbing in Oslo and the following massacre of the young people at the youth camp has shocked and saddened all civilised people.

At first I like most people thought it carried the hallmarks of muslim extremists especially as there are 190,000 muslims in Norway and there have been threats from them in the past.

Now the perpetrator has turned out to be a native Norwegian the Lefty multiculturalists can hardly contain themselves calling him a "Right Wing" extremist, and thereby condemning by association all nationalist parties including the BNP.

This man was never a patriot nor a nationalist.

He is a nutter, pure and simple.

NATIONALIST DO NOT KILL THEIR OWN, especially young people (even if it was a political youth camp).
Nationalists believe in their own country and work to safeguard that by POLITICAL MEANS, NOT MURDER. This latter is the act of a psycopath not a political activist.

Although we do not know the details of this man, it seems he was a fundamentalist Christian and Mason.
Are these two groups also to be tainted by association?

The real shock of this outrage is that the killer was white European, showing how unusual and unexpected this kind of action in our civilised continent, and we can at least be thankful for that.

It is the exception rather than the rule, unlike the situation in islamic countries.

Unfortunately there will always be nutters in our otherwise civilised society such as the Dunblane gunman who murder as a result of mantal aberrations.

BUT DON'T BLAME NATIONALISM or "Right Wing" views.

WE ARE NOT LIKE THAT!

The buildings in Oslo can be replaced but those killed in Oslo and the innocent young people mercilessly butchered on the island can never be.

I SEND MY HEARTFELT SYMPATHIES TO THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS IN THEIR LOSS,inadequate I know but all I can do at this sad time.

THE FOLLY OF AID

A change for our party's navel gazing today.

Prominent in the papers and especially on BBC television is the dire situation in the Horn of Africa with millions going hungry.

The UN criticises Europe for being slow to contribute to food aid, but British people have voluntarily given millions in donations, although how close to the needy these will ever get is a different matter.

25 years ago we were urged by St Bob Geldoff and later by St Bono to give to famine relief in that region when the population was only half of its present size.

In other words the situation is made worse long term by their interference, for as the children are saved they adopt local habits and brred prolifically, without thinking of the consequences.

I would have liked more than two children but cut my family size to what I thought I and the country could sustain.

So why is famine a perennial problem in this area?
I believe it is because it is where the islamic world of thoughtless breeding meets Afican ignorance.
Muslims are encouraged to have large families while Africans lack the intellectual capacity to provide for them


Muslim countries in the Middle East have these overpopulation problems with young unemployed populations and this has been a reason for the recent unrest.
Fortunately for them they have had the oil money to fend off starvation by buying their food.This can not go on for ever as the increasing and ever more restless populations will inevitably overtake the capacity of those countries to feed them.
And then they (and we) will be in trouble.

Our foolish government already gives more of its national product than any other country even though we are a debter country to China and Arab oil countries who have so far failed to contribute anything.
Nor has any islamic country.

SO WHY SHOULD WE BORROW MONEY FROM RICHER SOLVENT COUNTRIES pay interest on it and give it away?



Why should the British people having had their tax money taken from them be cajoled into giving more?

It is not that I have no sympathy with these people's plight. I have, but we are in no position to continue to protect them from their own actions.We can not afford it especially as it is making matters worse.

IT IS THE ECONOMICS OF THE MADHOUSE and piracy of our taxpayers.

And WHICH OF THESE COUNTRIES WILL HELP US WHEN WE NEED IT? which we surely will if we continue to give away borrowed money.

THEY WON'T EVEN GIVE TO THEIR OWN! so God help us.

We, as a country are overpopulated, in debt and crowded out with alien peoples who care nothing for us or our land. We can not feed ourselves now let alone in the future when our population has increased owing to the influx of these uninvited immigrants.

We really are heading for disaster and sadly the proof that--

ENOCH POWELL WAS RIGHT.

I SHALL NOT BE CONTRIBUTING TO THIS APPEAL--AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU.

Cameron has already stolen too much in taxation from us and given it away.

MISUSE OF OUR LANGUAGE AND INSULTS OF PATRIOTS

Misuse of word meanings has been a common instrument of propaganda in politics for hundreds of years.

In the 20th century Stalin used the epithet "Enemy of the People" to persecute and often execute Russians whose only "crime" was to be perceived as a threat to the regime. Others were exiled to slave labour for this alleged crime, even though many had been working loyally in it.

Later Soviet satellites were set up with the title including the word "Democratic" as in DDR or the German Democratic Republic and that word is still used to a degree in Africa as in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

One thing you can be certain of is that if the title of a country has "Democratic" in it, it means the opposite.

When analysed these terms indicate that opposition to or questioning of the regime is not tolerated.

In smaller organisations similar tactics of word distortion are used, and indeed we have it in our party.

TRAITOR has been used to describe anyone in the party who disagrees with the leadership and that is one of the milder insults.

Other words such as "Searchlight Spies", "Reds" or "UAF infiltrators" are also unjustly used, basically as a means to ensure obedience or exclusion of anyone who has a problem with the hierarchy.

Democracy is another word abused by the leadership.
Excessive powers for the chairman and hastily convened meetings with resolutions passed with the help of dubious "proxy votes" are not democratic and another abuse of our language.

The leadership must realise that our loyalty is to our country, people and the party is just the vehicle for that, and the leader of the party has to show he is promoting these ideals.
To criticise the leader for any failures he has is not treachery it is a duty.
He is not the party. WE ARE.

A list of the people now supporting a change in leadership (and many of those expelled) reads like a roll call of the best in the party who by their actions in recent years have been responsible for our gaining two MEPs.

HARDLY TRAITORS OR SEARCHLIGHT SPIES!

THEY BY THEIR ACTIONS HAVE PROVED THEIR LOYALTY TO THE CAUSE.

Yes, we will have embedded people who wish to cause our party damage but they will be found among more recent members who exercise powers disproportunate to their length of membership.

WE MUST FIND AND RESIST THESE INFILTRATORS but--

DO NOT INSULT THE REAL PATRIOTS both in the party and expelled who have in the past built the party up.

AND DO NOT ABUSE OUR LANGUAGE.

CORRECTION TO DEMOCRACY FORUM

It seems our fame is spreading to the Democracy Forum where our blogs have been quoted.

I would like to comment on this forum and was previously able to so do, but recently I have been obliged to register each day, I don't know why and I can't be bothered with the hassle and now just read the posts, especially as my computer skills are somewhat limited.

One post I saw on the forum yesterday said that we did not allow non members to help us leaflet. COMPLETELY UNTRUE.

We have always been grateful for any help we could get and wives, girlfriends and children of members and many other non members from as far away as Ormskirk have helped us.

It is just a case of Griffin supporters lies or more likely trouble causers who post in order to cause dissent.

It is a pity that we can not have open debate without all this bile and hatred.

We are all SUPPOSED to be nationalists

NO CONFIDENCE IN OUR POSITION?

Well it seems our little blog is having an effect and is getting up the noses of the "official" faction in the party.
GOOD.

Members supporting the present chairman have been advised to avoid our blog and that of the St Helens Patriot as we are apparently very biased in Andrew Bron's favour.
A "member" (Mike Whitby?) it seem has made a "complaint"

Well I do support Andrew, but it is an indication of their desire to avoid people seeing an alternative view that this warning has been issued.

They obviously do not have much confidence in their own arguments.

Foe myself, I am quite happy to visit sites with views which may be different form mine but in the end make my own mind up.
However up to now I have seen nothing to convince me that we do not need a new leader.

For instance.

Yesterday we learnt that Nick Griffin DOES owe in excess of £45,000 for printing which he previously denied and he has lost a court case regarding this.

I do not necessarily condemn him for the debt but I DO condemn him for denying that judgement had been awarded against him.

I KNOW there are several others in the pipeline which Nick denies.He is thus guilty of blatant dishonesty and I have lost my ability to believe anything he says.

Yes he has done much for the Party in the past but shady deals and lies stick in my craw and show him to be no better than the leaders of other parties.

I joined the BNP partly because I considered it to be honest (as well as patriotic).

I think the vast majority of members are, but when those at the top become tarnished by corruption and deceit my duty is to help promote the election of a new leader whose reputation is unsullied by such antics.

THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ADVISED TO AVOID THIS BLOG (AND ST HELENS) SHOWS WE ARE TOO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH FOR THEIR LIKING.

TO THOSE WHO PUT THIS ADVICE OUT--THANKYOU FOR YOUR ENDORSEMENT OF THE TRUTH OF MY ARGUMENTS.

MY ARGUMENTS WILL STAND SCRUTINY, YOURS WON'T

THAT IS WHY YOU ARE HOT UNDER THE COLLAR!

A Totalitarian State at the Heart of Europe

MOTIVATION.WHY PEOPLE DO AS THEY DO

What motivates people to do things, to work play or engage in altruistic activities?

Well people work (and sometimes cheat)to obtain money to make a living. Some work for the pleasure of their work or hobby when money can be a secondary consideration.

And many put effort in and work in altruistic ways because they want to make the world a better place for themselves AND OTHERS.

This latter category includes the hard working activists in our party who put time and money for the sake of our country's future.

ANDREW BRONS IS SUCH A MAN!

He has reached the stage in his life where I am sure he would be happy to sit at home with his feet up.
He has I'm sure a reasonable teachers pension and at present his EU salary so he does not need the money.

Knowing the task he was asked to take on in challenging for the party leadership he was naturally reluctant, being aware of the bile the party machine would throw at him.
That is why he at first hesitated.

BUT THEN HIS DUTY TO OUR COUNTRY PERSUADED HIM.

He was asked by members, concerned at the downward spiral of our fortunes to attempt to rescue us.
His advantage over any other challenger is that he is well known and liked in nationalist circles and that that he is not in it for personal benefit.

Our present leader's advantage is that he is better known than any possible contender and he has used this advantage ruthlessly in past elections through the party website (not to mention expelling anyone who might pose a threat).

ANDREW'S MOTIVATION IS THAT HE WISHES TO FURTHER OUR PARTY AND ITS NATIONALIST PRINCIPLES,and nothing else.

NOW WE COME TO NICK GRIFFIN. What's his motivation?

What motivated him to renage on his promise to stand down in 2014 and force through a resolution insisting on a four year term of office by dubious methods and counter to what was agreed at Codnor 3 years ago?

IN A WORD MONEY.

I do not necessarily blame him for that. He has to live and he has worked hard for the party over the years with some success but now his star is on the wane and he is still relatively young.

It is believed that the party's finances are in a mess although without up to date audited accounts we do not know the extent. We do know that the party was over half a million pounds in debt last year. Membership has since fallen as have donations but we are told that much of the debt has been paid off.

HOW? JUST TELL US.

Another motivation for Nick is that his daughter and son in law depend on the party for their income.

The party has become a family business. Nick Griffin Ltd.

The party belongs to its members and if it had been run well our chairman could have had another term in Brussels. I think he realises that goal is out of his reach, hence his change of mind.

He has to salvage something for the future himself and his family, and I don't blame him for that,
BUT NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE NATIONALIST CAUSE.

He has worked hard but we can not continue supporting him for ever when we are going downhill.

Nick's sycophantic acolytes also owe their position and salaries to him and his continued tenure of the position of leader.

BUT THE ACTIVIST BASE HAS BEEN DESTROYED.

Look at the pictures in the leaflet we received today.
The same small group of people campaigning all over the country. Why do the local branches do this?

Because they are few and far between, having been destroyed in various ways by the hierarchy.

So there we have it.

Both contenders began MOTIVATED AS NATIONALISTS to work for our country but one has been contaminated by the lucre of his position.

That is why Andrew is the best choice. Even though his family would I'm sure prefer to see him more HE HAS PUT THE COUNTRY FIRST.

Nick's family need him to continue to bring home the bacon AND OF NECESSITY COMPEL HIM TO HANG ON to the remnants of his former glories.

THAT IS WHY PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN OUR CAUSE SHOULD-

VOTE ANDREW BRONS

WORKING TO NO AVAIL

I yield to nobody in my admiration of the hard work, dedication and patriotism of Salford BNP.
However today they have been instigating a massive spamming exercise on the Democracy Forum, fulsom in praise of Nick Griffin.

All the lads (and lasses) there are good people but I believe misguided in their unqualified support for our present leader and their ignoring of his deficiencies.
Why this sudden barrage of support for their embattled leader?
Why does the branch or person speaking for it purport to speak for all its members?

Our blog is independent and thus able to say things as we see them.
We may not always agree but at least we speak freely.

It seems Salford have become a mouthpiece for the Griffinite poodle Mike Whitby who seems to spend his time spamming in support of Griffin.

When I receive these letters I answer them and spread them to those in my address book and in doing so have persuaded several undecided people to back Andrew Brons for leadership

It will be interesting if after this to see if I receive any more of Mike Whitby's drivel.

If I do I shall rebut his statements.

If I don't and others do I will broadcast the fact that he has ceased to communicate with me for fear of me winning the argument.(again)

I know this may not seem to be fair as I can beat him any time but the stakes are high, not only for our party but our people and we must rid ourselves of our present incompetent leadership and get a new clean image.
Our present leadership is dragging us down.

How do I come to that conclusion?

Because in one ward in Salford our (good ) candidate was unfortunately beaten by the English Democrats at the last local elections from a standing start.

That should have told them something but alas it did not and they are still following the proven failed leader in a downward spiral.

They have so much energy and dedication think what they could achieve if we had a better leader who was respected by the electorate and whom they were prepared to vote for.

The people are crying out for a clean honest nationalist alternative to the present major parties and we are missing this support.

I hope they will soon remove the blinkers from their eyes and see the light.

It is sad that so much work is to no avail.

MANIPULATION OF THE MEDIA

The frenzy over the media hacking scandle goes on and is the hot topic at present taking precedence over our serious debt problems and unjust wars.

Why is this?

The reason is that the major parties have at last an opportunity to collectively attack Rupert Murdoch and his over powerful media group.
Previously they feared to cross him lest he used his considerable media clout to back an opposing party.


That is why Blair and now Cameron were in so much contact with this over powerful man.

No doubt other papers are guilty of the same misdemeanours but not on such a large or blatant scale.
The fact remains that the media barons are too powerful and should, all of them be cut down to size.

That is why we invariably get as a party a bad press as our policies are against the global capitalism which sustains these tycoons and makes them wealthy.


THEY ARE A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.

It is also why free thinking people must use such blogs as this to promote alternative views.

The media monopoly of news has its equivalent threat to democracy in our party with the present leadership bending the truth and on occasion spreading outright lies about their opponents within the party.

The rules of the current election have been deliberately constructed to give the present leader an advantage and then broken to consolidate that advantage. The hierarchy of the party depend on the present leader for their jobs and thus obey his every instruction, however misguided that is.

Insults and character assasinations have been their stock in trade while valid questions have received no answer.

I am not accusing any of the hierarchy of phone hacking, but some of their underhand methods are as shameful as those employed by News International.

I and others received a letter (possibly against the electoral rules made up by Nick)from the poodle Mike Whitby with a raft of allegations against the challenger which are patently untrue.

The allegations are not accompanied by answers to the many questions which have been put to head office and can easily be refuted.

The fact that there is something wrong with the present party is shown by those who support the challenger, Sharon Wilkinson, Dave Shapcott, Martin and Tina Wingfield, Arthur Kemp, Mike Howson, Richard Edmonds,John Walker, and John Bean former editor of "Identity" and even Briam Mahoney head of financial scrutiny.

These are long standing nationalists who have worked hard for our cause unlike many of the officials now in control, and if people of this quality believe that change is needed their views should be listened to.

They know what is going on or has gone on and they are obviously not satisfied.

As I am not an official I have a right and possibly a duty to the party to bring these matters into the open.

In the party at present we do not have a free press and are thus little better than Murdoch in the twisting and distortion of the truth.

We must combat the threat to national democracy in the national press, but we can only do that if we have democracy in the party.

We do not have that at present.

We must be squeaky clean, and set an example.

WE ARE NOT NOW.

THAT IS WHY WE NEED CHANGE SO THAT WE CAN RESCUE THE PARTY AND THE NATIONALIST CAUSE FROM ITS DOWNWARD SPIRAL.

One man's interests must not take precedence over our cause.

MORE THAN EVER OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE NEED A THRIVING NATIONALIST PARTY.

WE MUST NOT AND WILL NOT LET THEM DOWN

PAT CONDELL - FAR LEFT PRICKERY

The Multi-Layered Betrayal of Britain

In his latest guest-essay, the English author Paul Weston takes a clear-eyed look at the grim reality of Modern Multicultural Britain. Although his analysis is far from optimistic, he does remind us that everything in the UK is on the verge of counter-revolutionary change. There is no choice — the change has to come.

------------------------

oor old Britain is in a terrible state. Whilst the recent obscenity of a Labour government is mostly to blame for this, they were not alone in the cultural and racial war which has been waged against the British people over the last half-century. Such has been the all-encompassing assault on who we once were that it is now hard to find any social group which has not been betrayed.

For example:

The Wartime Generation: They sacrificed so much, indeed died in their hundreds of thousands in order that our generation could live in freedom. Today they are sidelined and ignored by the Socialist ruling classes, who consider the culture and politics of these aged warriors to be wildly out of tune with modern liberal group-think.

A book was published last year called The Unknown Warriors which collated the stories and concerns of this greatest, yet disregarded people. And it is a heartbreaking read. Over and over again these brave and stoic people mentioned one word — betrayal.

Their principal concerns were the submission of vast swathes of British cities to various foreign entities without due recourse to the democratic process, coupled with the bitter irony of handing over their bloodily defended democracy to an unelected, dictatorial foreign power in Brussels.

One particularly harrowing story was that of the extraordinary bravery shown by a Lancaster bomber rear-gunner, who continued to climb into his turret time and time again even as he saw scores of his friends killed in the most horrific ways imaginable. His bravery has been betrayed though, because he is now reduced to a prisoner within his own house, too frightened to go outside because of the violence and abuse he receives from Socialist-educated children as young as nine.

His despairing voice can be heard through another Royal Air Force veteran, who remarked eloquently of his comrades who had made the ultimate sacrifice for their country: “I mourned them then, but now surviving in a world indifferent to their hopes and dreams, I grieve more for the living.”

The Elderly: Mostly too young to fight in the war, they are nonetheless similarly excluded from modern liberal society. Their views on marriage, homosexuality, morality, Christianity, parenthood, etc. make them the enemy of Socialist ideology. In Africa, the elderly are treated with respect as learned human beings. In Britain the elderly are vilified for simply defying the Socialist Revolution, and as such are considered an embarrassing clutch of old dodderers who can be safely labelled as extremist whilst their views are carefully withheld from the young — who incidentally, and quite literally, frighten the life out of the elderly.

They watch in bemusement and horror as the politicians and the mainstream media force a degraded culture upon their country. They shiver in front of single-bar electric fires, wondering whether they can afford to eat and stay warm. They watch their carefully amassed life-savings eroded as the politicians and bankers artificially manipulate interest-rates and inflation-rates to benefit only themselves. They shake their heads at stories of Iraqis and Somalis living in luxuriously equipped million-pound mansions in which to house their teeming broods, all paid for by the state.

The Young: Who would be young in Britain today? Youngsters have been schooled in liberal/progressive ideology from the moment they set foot in kindergarten. Although filled with a wholly misguided sense of self-esteem, they require remedial classes in reading and writing when they go to university (as some 50% now do) and have no conception of what they do not know.

They view their historic culture as one of imperialism, oppression and racism. They have no notion of respect, civility, dignity, Christianity, duty, honour, integrity or patriotism. Propagandised all their lives in the Socialist ideologies of moral and cultural relativism and multiculturalism, they are blissfully unaware that everything they believe in can only lead to the loss of everything they presently take for granted.

When they leave university they take with them debts in the tens of thousands of pounds and compete for jobs that pay salaries that can never enable them to buy the immigration-driven grotesquely-priced houses that were once affordable to their parents. They turn to drink and drugs in the moral and spiritual vacuum built for them by the Socialist Left, and stagger around the streets of British cities and towns in a booze-fuelled orgy of tattooed promiscuity and violence that shocks and horrifies the rest of the civilised world.

They do not understand that their own world is rapidly changing. The last fifty years saw a peaceful and relentless rise in prosperity, but that is now over. Where once there were ten workers to every retiree the ratio will soon be only two-to-one. Their future is therefore bankrupt. There will be no pensions when they are old. They may well have to work until they drop, and already there is talk of raising the retirement age to seventy. They are the lost generation, and these poor, deluded, Socialist-brainwashed children do not even know it.

The Newborn: What sort of country will they inherit? In 2050 a person born today will be only 39 years old, but he will find himself nearing a racial minority status in his own homeland. In 1950 whites made up 25% of the global population. Today they number only 9%, and by 2050 a mere 5%. This might not otherwise have mattered greatly, but Britain makes up only 1% of the habitable land mass and 1% of the world population, and we have opened our doors to the demographically explosive Third World.

The history of man is war, and wars are always fought along tribal and religious lines. The mass importation of Muslim tribes and Muslim religion into Britain can only guarantee future violence. Whether it can be contained in intra-country civil conflict is yet to be known, but it is likely that what will start out as a carbon copy of the recent Yugoslav conflict must only and logically lead to World War III.

The Christians: Although the majority of the British identify themselves as Christian, our Socialist ruling class have no time for such an outdated and oppressive ideology. As Tony Blair so memorably stated: “We don’t do God” — a view shared by the unelected Socialist dictators within the European Union who refuse to recognise the influence of Christianity in the cultural formation of Europe.

Christians are persecuted and vilified in Britain, be they nurses who wish to wear a cross to work, hotel owners who would rather not let homosexuals practice sodomy on their freshly laundered linen, or people who fail to recognise the immersion of a figure of Jesus Christ in a vat of urine is an edgy expression of “conceptually challenging” art. In addition, the blasphemy laws were repealed by the last Labour government because they specifically related to Christianity and were therefore deemed “discriminatory.”

Alexander Solzhenitsyn stated that “To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.” This is exactly why Christianity is under attack in Britain. Just as Communist countries feared a moral alternative to the godless and immoral religion of Socialism, so our home-grown Socialist rulers follow suit.

Religious Education in schools which previously centred on Christianity is now devoted to Multi-Religious Studies. Conspiracy theorists are not exaggerating in the least when they suggest that mass immigration and Multiculturalism were not deployed for honourable reasons, but to specifically erode Christian Britain.

A good example of this is the BBC’s attitude towards Islam, which it suggests should be treated more sensitively than Christianity. And whilst Islam is promoted as a female-friendly religion of tolerance and compassion, Christianity is obscenely portrayed as an ideology of racism, imperialism and murder. This is so perverse and abnormal one can only assume that our Socialist rulers have declared all-out war against Christianity — as indeed they have.

The Middle Class: When Vaclav Havel assumed the Presidency of Czechoslovakia in 1989, he stated that one of the most important jobs to be undertaken was the rebuilding of the middle class, which had been decimated by the Communists.

The values and morals of the middle classes are the backbone of a democratic Nation State. This is why the Communists set out to eradicate them, and this is exactly why British Socialists have done the same. The “bourgeoisie” have been subjected to vilification for the last fifty years, with the attack against them led — rather ironically — by the middle-class intelligentsia within the BBC and the Educational Authorities,

The middle class is a bulwark against state oppression, and so had to be cleansed. Elitism, independence, Christianity and morality are the enemies of the Socialists. One of the more obvious manifestations of Socialism’s enormous success in this field concerns accents. It is very rare today to find a well spoken Englishman under the age of fifty. Class warfare has won, and the traditional middle classes are out of the loop. If one wishes to work in state media or education, one must adopt an Estuary English accent à la Jamie Oliver. We are all working class now.

The Working Class: The Labour Party was originally formed to protect the interests of the working class, so it is more than a little bizarre that the worst damage wreaked upon the very people who make up their core vote was perpetrated by the Socialists within the Labour Party itself.

Throughout the 1960s and 1970s the Trades Union Movement set out to systematically dismantle the manufacturing and industrial base of Britain. The Union leaders who called for more-or-less permanent industrial action were to a man Communists, all taking their orders from their comrades in Moscow. Although Margaret Thatcher and the Conservative Party foolishly completed what the Socialists had started, it is unarguable that the extinction of Britain’s shipbuilding and automotive industries was instigated by the Socialist traitors within the Labour Party.

But this pales into insignificance when compared to the damage inflicted upon the working class by the last Labour government. Their policy of mass immigration and multiculturalism has primarily affected the working class, who find themselves in direct competition with imported third-worlders for territory, education, housing and jobs.

The champagne-socialists who deliberately set out to transform traditional Britain have the financial means necessary to live as far away as possible from the multicultural hell-holes they have deliberately created, the means to educate their children in schools where English remains the first language, and the means to ensure that neither they nor their children ever fall victim to the endemic crime and violence so prevalent in Socialism’s disgracefully manufactured “diverse” communities.

The white working class are not so fortunate. What the Socialists have done to them amounts to the biggest betrayal in the history of this country.

The Immigrants: It is with great sadness that I compare the young blacks in Britain today with their grandparents. The rap-addicted, dope-smoking, unemployable and violent young blacks we see around us bear little resemblance to the well dressed men and women aboard the MV Empire Windrush, which docked at Tilbury in 1948.

They too have been betrayed. Encouraged to retain their culture rather than assimilate, they have been similarly let down by terrible inner-city schooling that refuses to equip them with the skills necessary to live decent and rewarding lives in a capitalist liberal democracy, because to educate them sufficiently is apparently racist.

This is deliberate, of course. Educated, assimilated immigrants are of little use to the Socialists, as so succinctly explained by education “expert” Professor Chris Mullard CBE, who had the following to say with regard to the non-education of black children:

“Already we have started to rebel, to kick out against our jailers…As more black Britons leave school disgruntled, as more black Britons discard their yoke of humility, the ultimate confrontation will become clearer…Blacks will fight with pressure, leaflets, campaigns, demonstrations, fists and scorching resentment which, when peaceful means fail, will explode into street fighting, urban guerrilla warfare, looting, burning and rioting.”

A great evil has been perpetrated upon coloured immigrants by the Socialists, who view them as mere pawns to be used in their fight against the capitalist and Christian West. Professor Mullard is a Communist who infiltrated the British Educational Authorities, and was subsequently, and unsurprisingly, knighted by the treacherous Labour government.

I have used defined groups of peoples and classes to show how we have been betrayed, but we can add some further minority groups who are absolutely essential in allowing the continuation of a liberal democracy and who were therefore earmarked for Socialist re-education or destruction — the traditional family, fathers, non-feminist housewives and mothers, and the apolitical police, judiciary and civil service.

There are a very small number of people who have not been betrayed. The baby-boomer liberal intelligentsia have done very well out of the slow-motion Socialist revolution that has destroyed Britain, as have the super-rich, the politicians and the bankers, who now look to retain their gargantuan bonuses whilst simultaneously redirecting their debts onto the shoulders of the taxpayer.

But at the top of the pile sits Islam. Imported and appeased by politicians of all parties, Islam is the real winner here and is promoted as the religion of peace when it is clearly no such thing. Polygamy laws are ignored in order that Muslims may demographically destroy us, laws are introduced to curtail any criticism on pain of exhibiting “Islamophobia”, and money is directed toward them in order that they need not work to house their multiple wives and children even as they plan to overthrow us.

The rest of us, however — the war veterans, the elderly, the young, the new-born, the indigenous population, the non-Islamic immigrants, the middle-class, the working-class and the Christians — have been betrayed in our entirety.

At the risk of repeating myself, this is totally unacceptable and totally unsustainable. Liberalism’s useful idiots need to be made aware of the error of their ideology, whilst the hard-core Socialist Left must be made to understand that one day, hopefully in the not too distant future, they will be tried before People’s Courts immediately after the reintroduction of the death penalty for treason.

If Britain is to survive the coming decades as a peaceful democracy, then we need to have a counter-revolution of the mind and a counter-revolutionary political party to effect radical change. No viable party currently exists in Britain, but to end this depressing article on a note of optimism, this matter is actively being addressed by a group of people, amongst whom I am proud to include myself.

Taken from http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/

NICK GRIFFIN - ELECTION 2011

A RATTLED LEADER.

At last we have the opportunity to see Nick Griffin's election video, and what a mess it is!

Obviously rattled(or cornered)he tosses the leaflet sent to members last week saying it was full of lies about his family and the party. He said he would ignore it.

That's what he has been doing to our questions for the last couple of years.
We don't want ignoring we want answers.

I'm sorry his wife is upset. She must be a more sensitive soul than I had thought.

Geoff Dickens is to seek to find out who has sent out this scurrilous (factual) material and take action.
The police are to be informed and law suits will perhaps follow.

Well Nick is used to losing law suits and as there is nothing illegal I don't see what action that will achieve.

He says Andrew has been fed poison and does not know what the reality is.
That is an insult to Andrew who is only standing because he does know what is going on and wishes to halt the decline.

Griffin on the other hand wants to keep his job.

He invites Andrew to head office to see the figures.

How about publishing them so we can all see? We have a right to know!

He says that the party is turning around its problems while failing to say that even if it is those problems occured on his watch so he is responsible.

Andrew is offered a position on the scrutiny committee with Brian Mahoney when Nick is re elected (he seems very confident before the results are announced).
If so Andrew should have no trouble working with Brian as Brian is backing him.

When such a senior official as Brian Mahoney, who knows what is going on financially backs a change in leader it speaks for itself, and indicates that we need open finances.

Yes Nick we are all in agreement about soldiers and pensioners etc so why mention them?
You have to say how you would run the party differently and halt its decline.
That is the gist of Andrew's video.

But then if you did that you would have to accept responsibility for our decline and your pride (avarice) will not allow you to do that.

All in all your petulant reply shows you have lost the argument even if you win the election as you so confidently imply.

Andrew Brons Leadership Election 2011

THOUGHT YOU ALL COULD DO WITH A LAUGH

Morg
.

THIS IS WHERE OUR "SECURITY EXPERTS" WERE WIPED OUT AND TREASON TO BEGIN

The pilots were accused of gross negligence after 29 people died on the flight from Belfast to Inverness when it crashed on the Mull of Kintyre 17 years ago.

Campaigners fought for nearly two decades for Flt Lt Jonathan Tapper and Flt Lt Richard Cook to be cleared of blame.

Liam Fox, the defence secretary, ordered a review into the cause of the 1994 crash in September last year,

The independent report, chaired by Lord Philip, a retired judge, is understood to say that the pilots should not have been accused of gross negligence.

The Chinook, carrying 25 of Britain’s most senior intelligence experts and four special forces crew, crashed in thick fog on 2 June 1994, in what was the RAF’s worst peacetime accident.

Two RAF Air Marshals concluded that the pilots were guilty of gross negligence but their findings have been disputed by campaigners ever since.

Despite the long campaign by the pilots’ supporters, successive defence secretaries have refused to overturn the Marshals’ conclusions.

But now, after a nine-month inquiry, Lord Philip’s recommendations have been submitted to Mr Fox, who is due to make a statement to MPs on the findings next week.

Campaigners hope that the defence secretary will posthumously clear the pilots of blame.

In April this year, newly discovered Ministry of Defence documents cast doubt on the original explanation for the Chinook crash, suggesting that official concerns had been expressed over the airworthiness of the RAF’s fleet of Chinooks two years earlier.

It is understood the documents were never shown to the officer in charge of signing off the aircraft’s airworthiness.

------------------------------------

The above crash killed the most senior security experts that Britain had.

With the death of these men and the knowledge that they took with them to the grave allowed the treasonus destruction of Britain and the creation of the EU to begin.

The Heads of Britains Security Services were never allowed to travel together to protect them from such disasters, yet they were ALL allowed to travel together in this Chinook. Something that they would never normally do. So why did they ?

When you ask yourself how we have gotten ourselves into this position with a foreign enemy invited to live amongst us, the 25 men mentioned above would never have allowed this to happen.

When they went to their deaths it was hoped that we, as a nation and a people would follow suit. Tony Bliar and his TREASONUS CRONIES would never have been allowed to come to power under the guidance and direction of our Security Services led by the men who were more than probably murdered in the Mull of Kintyre air crash.

SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT

Enough for a while of this navel gazing!

There will be few nationalists who do not feel a little schadenfreude at the closure of the News of The World.

The owner, ruthless global capitalist Murdoch is finally getting a few of his just desserts. His paper's underhand and criminal tactics to sensationalise and libel innocent people who can not afford legal redress have been long notorious.

Our party has often been libelled by his publications, mainly I believe on account of our opposition to his capitalist creed which puts the interests of the wealthy above the people of our country.

Of course he has no allegience to Britain. He is an Aussie living in the USA and his media empire with its near stranglehold on news represents a danger to democracy.

He has far too much power and political influence for one who has not been elected, and the courting of him and subaservience to him by our political leaders shows their contempt for us and their cowardice.

As has been said before "absolute power corrupts absolutely"

Fortunately he has been shown that he does not have absolute power and it is to be hoped that he is to be cut down to size.

Not that the other press barons are much better. The press is controlled by less than a dozen powerful men, all biased against the British people and our party.

The internet is giving us an opportunity to counter this democratic deficit but the press still remains powerful.

That's why the demise or rebranding of VoF is such a disappointment. Formerly it was printed on newsprint and was informative and well edited and people asked for it.
The new version looks like a leaflet which in effect it is with little to stimulate the reader.

The reason for this change was said to be to improve it, but I have been told it was because we had not paid for the printing of previous editions.

Whatever the reason there is little demand for it, and we still in spite of the internet need a newspaper vehicle to promote our policies.

Who decided to change the format and the reason I can only have an educated guess, another reason for openness in our party.

Be that as it may, PLEASE BRING BACK VOF

HOT UNDER THE COLLAR

We received our booklet from supporters of Andrew Brons this morning.

It is dynamite and exposes in a clear and concise form some of the shady practices and corruption employed by the leadership of the party.

It charts in detail the decline in our party fortunes over the last two years with the numbers of council seats lost and our proportion of the vote going down.

Any leader who was interested in the future of our party and country would have done the decent thing and resigned as he promised.
Yes Nick Griffin has done great things in the past but it is time for him to go before he does more damage.

The booklet has got them rattled and contain the allegations of "lies".I have had a text and e mail asking me to complain about the leaflet.

If so let the party sue, after all Griffin seems to spend much of his time in court at great cost to the membership.

Let him prove the so called lies, an accusation he frequently uses without any proof.

It is alleged that the leaflet has been put out by Butler.That is not true.

Although I have had no part in it I know who has put it out . It was put out by Party members and thus not third parties as alleged.It was not put out by Andrew Brons nor I believe with his knowledge.

It was put out in an attempt to clear away the deceit and chicanery of the present leadership and tell the truth openly, and hopefully save our party from its downward spiral.

It is said to be illegal.
No it is not. It is only illegal according to the rules made up by Griffin to consolidate his advantage.

Some will have to wait until Monday as the letter was sent second class.

I was unable to attend the hustings last night but have been told that Brons was accused of wishing to bring Sadie Graham back in.
Completely untrue.
Also Clive Jefferson kept butting in with accusations that Brons owed the party money including £500 for the use of a table at the annual conference which he did not ask for.

I was at the conference and the question must be asked why the use of a table whether oredered or not justifies the cost of £500.

The same accusation was made in Liverpool I believe.

It is evident that Andrew is the man of integrity and refuses to divert EU funds illegally, a misdemeanour for which the party is now being charged by the EU.

I suppose by putting my views on this blog I will be considered a third party.

No I am not.
I am a long standing member and refuse to be denied my say, and I say that if (when) Griffin wins the party will rapidly decline into obscurity.

The sad thing is that it was all so unnecessary.

A democratic party devoid of expulsions for asking questions and openness over financial matters could have prevented all this.

All we get are allegations of lieing.

To sort it out once and for all--PUBLISH THE ACCOUNTS AND MEMBERSHIP NUMBERS and refute the allegations.

THE CONTEST GETTING NASTY

The leadership contest is hotting upand getting nasty.

On the official website the two candidates give their 500 word statements, provoking a barrage of comments 95% of which attack Brons and praise Griffin.
This seems strange and not in keeping with what people are telling me.

I believe Griffin's attack dogs have been loosed from their not very tight leashes.

Many of the statements they make are patent lies. It is a pity that they seem incapable of civilised discussion without resorting to untruths.

Today there are two NW "hustings", one at 5 pm in Salford and one later in Liverpool.
The fact that there are two on the same day with the first being so early (and inconvenient for workers), and at such short notice demonstrates the underhand tactics of our present leader.

Who decided the times of these hustings and the short notice? The same person who dropped the proxy votes on the GMM two weeks ago. Mr Nick Griffin.

I note in his election leaflet his present jobs are MEP, Director of Publicity and editor of VoF and Party Leader.

I would not have thought he would have had time to be editor of our paper and am still puzzled why Martin Wingfield an experienced journalist has been replaced.

It is evident that he has in the poor quality nowadays of what was a well written and intersting publication.

It is as if Nick Griffin does not trust anybody to work for the party except his family and the recent sycophants who have hitched their waggon to his and thus depend on him.

All the senior members who ran the party when I joined 8 years ago have now been replaced, expelled or left in disgust, including long standing members and councillors and activists.
The ones in control now are recent members, ill suited to their positions.

So it is evident that Griffin is not a unity candidate. He has presided over a mass exodus of talent and replaced that talent with mediocrity.

He says the party is growing now but gives no actual figures. I know many who after years of work have given up on the party and many are just hanging on in order to vote for a new leader.

This fact is not shown in the moderated comments on the main website.

We need to join together and Brons is the man to do it.
Too much venom has been spouted. It is time for an amnesty for all those driven away by the high handed actions of our present leader and join together as a strong political force.

Unfortunately those now outside the party will not come back to work with us unless we have a new leader.

If Brons is elected he will only be leader for a year until a new constitution is formulated.
If Griffin wins we are stuck with him in the downward spiral for another 4 years by which time there will be no effective party left.

An often forgotten decision taken at Codnor 3 years ago at the time when we voted for yearly elections was a generous pension for Griffin paid for out of party funds of if my memory serves me right of over £20,000 per year.

I wonder if he has changed this decision like he changed the one year rule for elections?
I am sure he will have tucked away somewhere,the obligation for the party to fund a generous retirement for him.

One last thing.

He says he is campaigning for a referendum on leaving the EU.

Good, we are all in favour of that.
BUT, When is the next batch of the "Bring our Boys Home" petitions to be handed in.

The first 10,000 were handed in amid much publicity and it was stated that others would be delivered later.

Have they been delivered ?

I'll not hold my breath.

MORE RUBBISH FROM THE TOP

Today the ballot papers have been delivered and we can choose our candidate for leader.
Also there has been an article on the official website urging us to vote in a democratic way and not "destabilise the democratic process"

They say that they are expecting some third party interference who are seeking to destroy our party and they do not have the interests of our party and country at heart.

WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH!

Who are these third party people.

There are only two candidates so how can pushing the merits of one candidate destabilise the democratic process or how by voting for the challenger Andrew Brons MEP have we not the interests of our country at heart.

It seems that Nick Griffin, even though surrounded by sycophants can see the opposition to his dictatorial rule and financial incompetence is gaining strength.

The fact that most activists (those who know what is going on) have deserted his camp (or been expelled) must have finally got through to him.

Just what are they on about.

There are only two candidates for God's sake.

The new "revised" constitution is mentioned setting out permissible means of communication is mentioned.

Who voted for this constitution. Nobody. It was made up by Griffin.

He has become a dictator using subterfuge and chicanery to consolidate his position, which position he fears losing.
In spite of his claim to have our country's interest at heart he has shown by his recent actions to have only his own and his family's interests (and those of his sycophantic officials) at heart.

Nick Griffin has become a toxic brand. If we are to survive as a party and movement we must vote him out.

Irrespective of his blunders, financial and poitical and his deviousness --

HE IS AN ELECTORAL LIABILITY.

WE WILL NEVER PROGRESS WITH HIM AS LEADER.

If you believe in our country, YOU MUST VOTE ANDREW BRONS.

I am aware that for writing this piece I will probably be disciplined.
If I am it will only show the democratic deficit in our party and the reason we must change.

If sanctions are invoked against me it would be indeed ironic in that I support the principles of the party and am only promoting one of the two candidates in the election, one who I believe can and will heal the wounds and unite the disparate nationalist strands which have been created as a result of the appalling dictatorship of Nick Griffin

I will keep this blog posted on any repercussions to this article which if they occur would demonstrate the validity of the above arguments.

A PRETEND DEMOCRACY?

So now it is official. A leadership challenge by Andrew Brons.
On the official website the announcement is titled "Democracy in Action", but as with many matters in the party further probing shows that all is not what it seems.

A rule stating that all campaigning must be conducted through "official channels" gives the lie to the previous statement.


Who controls these channels? Who has an inbuilt advantage as a result of being leader and thus better known to "armchair" voting members unaware of the virtues of the contender?
You guessed it. Nick Griffin.

I could be breaking the rules by this blog, just stating my opinion as an ordinary member.

That's democracy Griffin style, pretend democracy, as in the use of proxy votes to carry resolutions favouring the leader and cooked up by him, sidestepping the will of the party as expressed at EGMs and in conference resolutions.

Stifle the opposition from making their case while using the power of the official website to promote the leader.

Nick Griffin uses his position as leader to make the rules up as he goes on and of course he makes them up to favour himself.`
He needs to win a new spell as leader as he knows he has no chance of getting another term as an MEP so he has broken his promise to stand down in order to protect his future and that of his daughter and son in law on the payroll.

I know I am to an extent washing dirty linen in public but what other options have I got?.

As stated above camaigning in favour of candidates is forbidden and the rules changed to suit the interests of the leader at the whim of the leader and not put to a fair vote.

All this is un necessary. The Party is being split asunder, good nationalists expelled, splinter parties formed and membership going down. This at a time when the country is going to pot, jobs are being lost, taxes going up and we are being invaded by aliens.

WE SHOULD BE GAINING INFLUENCE NOW. All the conditions are right.

WHY IS OUR INFLUENCE GOING DOWN?

We should be united as nationalists, but it seems nationalism has been put second to the interests of the Griffin family and clique.

I joined our party, inspired by Nick Griffin but his recent blunders and avarice have set our cause back.

It is no good saying he built the party up. Yes he did but then after inspiring hard work and progress it does not give him the right to undo our work.

Since he has been leader all other parties have changed leader several times. If he carries on he will have been leader longer than Gadaffi!

So Nick. Thanks for what you have done (with our help) but now is the time to step down gracefully as you promised.

We need a new leader who can heal the wounds, many of which have been caused by you.

Our cause is more than any individual and Andrew Brons would heal these wounds and hopefully bind the disparate nationalist elements into a strong patriotic force.

Let's pull together. But I am afraid it is not possible under the present leadership.

P.S I shall continue in my support for the contender and although it may seem that I have been breaking the rules there is much more that I could say but for now I will keep silent on these matters.