Saturday, 16 July 2011

MOTIVATION.WHY PEOPLE DO AS THEY DO

What motivates people to do things, to work play or engage in altruistic activities?

Well people work (and sometimes cheat)to obtain money to make a living. Some work for the pleasure of their work or hobby when money can be a secondary consideration.

And many put effort in and work in altruistic ways because they want to make the world a better place for themselves AND OTHERS.

This latter category includes the hard working activists in our party who put time and money for the sake of our country's future.

ANDREW BRONS IS SUCH A MAN!

He has reached the stage in his life where I am sure he would be happy to sit at home with his feet up.
He has I'm sure a reasonable teachers pension and at present his EU salary so he does not need the money.

Knowing the task he was asked to take on in challenging for the party leadership he was naturally reluctant, being aware of the bile the party machine would throw at him.
That is why he at first hesitated.

BUT THEN HIS DUTY TO OUR COUNTRY PERSUADED HIM.

He was asked by members, concerned at the downward spiral of our fortunes to attempt to rescue us.
His advantage over any other challenger is that he is well known and liked in nationalist circles and that that he is not in it for personal benefit.

Our present leader's advantage is that he is better known than any possible contender and he has used this advantage ruthlessly in past elections through the party website (not to mention expelling anyone who might pose a threat).

ANDREW'S MOTIVATION IS THAT HE WISHES TO FURTHER OUR PARTY AND ITS NATIONALIST PRINCIPLES,and nothing else.

NOW WE COME TO NICK GRIFFIN. What's his motivation?

What motivated him to renage on his promise to stand down in 2014 and force through a resolution insisting on a four year term of office by dubious methods and counter to what was agreed at Codnor 3 years ago?

IN A WORD MONEY.

I do not necessarily blame him for that. He has to live and he has worked hard for the party over the years with some success but now his star is on the wane and he is still relatively young.

It is believed that the party's finances are in a mess although without up to date audited accounts we do not know the extent. We do know that the party was over half a million pounds in debt last year. Membership has since fallen as have donations but we are told that much of the debt has been paid off.

HOW? JUST TELL US.

Another motivation for Nick is that his daughter and son in law depend on the party for their income.

The party has become a family business. Nick Griffin Ltd.

The party belongs to its members and if it had been run well our chairman could have had another term in Brussels. I think he realises that goal is out of his reach, hence his change of mind.

He has to salvage something for the future himself and his family, and I don't blame him for that,
BUT NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE NATIONALIST CAUSE.

He has worked hard but we can not continue supporting him for ever when we are going downhill.

Nick's sycophantic acolytes also owe their position and salaries to him and his continued tenure of the position of leader.

BUT THE ACTIVIST BASE HAS BEEN DESTROYED.

Look at the pictures in the leaflet we received today.
The same small group of people campaigning all over the country. Why do the local branches do this?

Because they are few and far between, having been destroyed in various ways by the hierarchy.

So there we have it.

Both contenders began MOTIVATED AS NATIONALISTS to work for our country but one has been contaminated by the lucre of his position.

That is why Andrew is the best choice. Even though his family would I'm sure prefer to see him more HE HAS PUT THE COUNTRY FIRST.

Nick's family need him to continue to bring home the bacon AND OF NECESSITY COMPEL HIM TO HANG ON to the remnants of his former glories.

THAT IS WHY PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN OUR CAUSE SHOULD-

VOTE ANDREW BRONS

2 comments:

han solo said...

what happened to solidarity

Lanky Patriot said...

Do you mean the "union" or solidarity in our party?

If the former it seems to be not very solid.

If you mean solidarity with the aims of the Party we are all as one.

It's just that we need a new leader to progress but unfortunately "comrades in arms" fall out at election times.

In the end we all want the same things.
It is how to achieve it where we differ.

yaz