This concerns both police (three constables) and magistrates. Even though it's the constables doing the initial naughties, it's the behaviour of the magistrates that's the more troubling. Seems they have an attitude that if you are there you can only be guilty - regardless of evidence.
This confirms my long-held view that it's always better to be up before a real beak. More chance of genuine justice.
It's even more disturbing that though the constables are under investigation (fair enough - though bear in mind that they sometimes have a rough job in the town centre and can both go ott, and make mistakes too), the magistrates are away scot-free.
It's the magistrates that should be under the microscope over this incident. It seems obvious that Wigan magistrates do NOT see their task as administering justice.
Read it all, and watch the embedded film.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/latest-news/news/2008/11/29/brute-force-three-police-officers-beat-up-handcuffed-iraq-war-veteran-115875-20934568/
Morg
Sunday, 30 November 2008
Saturday, 29 November 2008
SUCCESS IN LIVERPOOL
An interesting, successful but cold day of action in Liverpool today in support of the "Liverpool Thirteen" who were wrongly arrested last Saturday for distributing perfectly legal leaflets. That no offense was comitted was shown by all charges being dropped by the police this morning.
Those arrested were informed by letter delivered at 8 am this morning, a peevish thing to do so early on a Saturday when some were still in bed. Some feared being rearrested.
Good news though and an admission that in spite of their worst efforts they conceded defeat.
ONE TO US! but perhaps the thought of hundreds of our members turning up in Liverpool had a bearing.
If they thought the demonstration would be cancelled they were wrong, especially as many activists were already on their way.
After meeting up by St George's Hall the good natured group of about 250, carrying flags and leaflets walked down to Church Street with a heavy police escort, un necessary as far as we were concerned as we were not bent on trouble.
In Church Street we found the police holding a rowdy rabble of students and trash of all sorts and colours shouting "off our streets". By their accents it was evident that they were not Liverpudlians and the streets were in fact ours. It is ironic to be told to get off the streets of your native city by people from elsewhere and an indication of what awaits our people if this mad immigration policy is not stopped and reversed.
We had a good response from the shoppers and at the request of the police moved back to St Georges Hall for a short speech by Pete Molloy, one of the "Thirteen", followed by an address by Nick Griffin who thanked all our supporters for their effort and solidarity. He also thanked the police for their efficiency and expressed the hope that relations would improve in future.
I doubt if the Searchlight brigade had any such courtesy, but then three of them were arrested while none of ours were as we believe in peaceful promotion of our views.
At the end of the proceedings in the city the "Truth Truck" drove down Lime Street followed by two "A" frames carrying the BNP logo.
Many then attended an after protest get together at a well known pub but those of us who had travelled by train were unable to go, so we returned to the station tired but satisfied at a job well done.
WE HAVE SHOWN OUR DETERMINATION TO STAND UP FOR DEMOCRACY.
I hesitate to guess what the police costs were, but our effort has surely made them think twice before persecuting us again and the chief who ordered the arrests must be regretting it.
THE NEXT STEP---
COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL ARREST.
Those arrested were informed by letter delivered at 8 am this morning, a peevish thing to do so early on a Saturday when some were still in bed. Some feared being rearrested.
Good news though and an admission that in spite of their worst efforts they conceded defeat.
ONE TO US! but perhaps the thought of hundreds of our members turning up in Liverpool had a bearing.
If they thought the demonstration would be cancelled they were wrong, especially as many activists were already on their way.
After meeting up by St George's Hall the good natured group of about 250, carrying flags and leaflets walked down to Church Street with a heavy police escort, un necessary as far as we were concerned as we were not bent on trouble.
In Church Street we found the police holding a rowdy rabble of students and trash of all sorts and colours shouting "off our streets". By their accents it was evident that they were not Liverpudlians and the streets were in fact ours. It is ironic to be told to get off the streets of your native city by people from elsewhere and an indication of what awaits our people if this mad immigration policy is not stopped and reversed.
We had a good response from the shoppers and at the request of the police moved back to St Georges Hall for a short speech by Pete Molloy, one of the "Thirteen", followed by an address by Nick Griffin who thanked all our supporters for their effort and solidarity. He also thanked the police for their efficiency and expressed the hope that relations would improve in future.
I doubt if the Searchlight brigade had any such courtesy, but then three of them were arrested while none of ours were as we believe in peaceful promotion of our views.
At the end of the proceedings in the city the "Truth Truck" drove down Lime Street followed by two "A" frames carrying the BNP logo.
Many then attended an after protest get together at a well known pub but those of us who had travelled by train were unable to go, so we returned to the station tired but satisfied at a job well done.
WE HAVE SHOWN OUR DETERMINATION TO STAND UP FOR DEMOCRACY.
I hesitate to guess what the police costs were, but our effort has surely made them think twice before persecuting us again and the chief who ordered the arrests must be regretting it.
THE NEXT STEP---
COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL ARREST.
Friday, 28 November 2008
THE FASCISTS ARE ARRESTING TORY MPS NOW
The depths the fascist Labour regime and their puppet chiefs of police will go to protect their scheme to destroy our country was shown yesterday in the arrest of Tory MP Damien Green.
The fact that he asked questions which were of great public interest and concerned immigration and the anti terror laws confirms the motives of these Stalinists.
It is Mr Green's job to expose government cover ups and inefficiencies. That he did so by exposing illegal immigrants in the Houses of Parliament and Home Office demonstrates he has touched a raw nerve in the Labour Party which is complicit in the destruction of the British way of life.
TRUTH HURTS! especially when traitors are exposed.
Perhaps some sympathy is due from the Tories to the "Liverpool Thirteen" who were also wrongly arrested for distributing perfectly legal leaflets which ,using Government figures showed how the crime statistics among immigrants were being manipulated. I won't hold my breath.
Of course Mr Green has the weight of the Tory Party behind him who will use their Parliamentary power to gain justice for him.
We have as yet no such clout, but what we lack in finance and influence we make up by commitment, hence the gathering of patriots in Liverpool tomorrow.
WE MAY BE WEAK AS YET BUT WE ARE DETERMINED.
The fact that he asked questions which were of great public interest and concerned immigration and the anti terror laws confirms the motives of these Stalinists.
It is Mr Green's job to expose government cover ups and inefficiencies. That he did so by exposing illegal immigrants in the Houses of Parliament and Home Office demonstrates he has touched a raw nerve in the Labour Party which is complicit in the destruction of the British way of life.
TRUTH HURTS! especially when traitors are exposed.
Perhaps some sympathy is due from the Tories to the "Liverpool Thirteen" who were also wrongly arrested for distributing perfectly legal leaflets which ,using Government figures showed how the crime statistics among immigrants were being manipulated. I won't hold my breath.
Of course Mr Green has the weight of the Tory Party behind him who will use their Parliamentary power to gain justice for him.
We have as yet no such clout, but what we lack in finance and influence we make up by commitment, hence the gathering of patriots in Liverpool tomorrow.
WE MAY BE WEAK AS YET BUT WE ARE DETERMINED.
WE WILL SPEAK FREELY AS FREE BRITONS, WHATEVER THEY SAY.
WE SHALL OVERCOME!
Thursday, 27 November 2008
FIRST MAKE US MAD
The horrific murders and hostage taking and carnage in Bombay yesterday highlight the danger faced by us all in this country.
British, Americans and Jews were especially targetted by muslim terrorists.
Unfortunately for them India has over 100 million muslims in it's country, about twice the percentage that we have. However our numbers are growing and their influence is becoming stronger, hence the completely over the top police reaction to our supporters in Liverpool and Burnley last week, the former arrested for delivering leaflets containing government statistics.
They obviously did not want people to know.
I do accept muslims have a particular grievance against our government over their invasion of Afganistan and Iraq, and its continued support for Israeli suppression of Palestinian rights.
However to allow ever increasing numbers of muslims into this country, many of whom are against us and potential if not actual terrorists and, to promote into positions of power and influence people from these groups is madness.
It is equivalent in the last war of allowing 2 million Germans in, giving them influence and saying they were a nation of peace. Of course some would have been peaceful but others wouldn't and how to tell them apart?
The only way the future of our country can be assured is to STOP muslim immigration, and encourage (not force) those here to return to their muslim lands.
As Enoch said "Those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad"
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
21st CENTURY BRITAIN
Or is it the 1930s/40s.
Who voted for this? Conscience troubling you? It should be.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gjVQ8GVqDxI&NR=1
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=96tDBpxouKg
Who voted for this? Conscience troubling you? It should be.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gjVQ8GVqDxI&NR=1
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=96tDBpxouKg
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
SOME MORE INTERESTING WIGAN NUMBERS
Total annual Wigan Council spending on publicity in the financial year 1996-1997 – the year immediately before our current government of oppressive Labour tyrants came to power:
£816,000
Total annual Wigan Council spending on publicity in the financial year 2006-2007 – after ten years of the spinmeisters in power:
£1,345,000
An increase in publicity spending per year of:
64.8%
You didn’t think spin came for free did you? YOU paid for that.
The total local authority annual publicity bill (2006-2007) is £450 million There is one local authority, Birmingham City Council, that spends more than £10 million on publicity.
£816,000
Total annual Wigan Council spending on publicity in the financial year 2006-2007 – after ten years of the spinmeisters in power:
£1,345,000
An increase in publicity spending per year of:
64.8%
You didn’t think spin came for free did you? YOU paid for that.
The total local authority annual publicity bill (2006-2007) is £450 million There is one local authority, Birmingham City Council, that spends more than £10 million on publicity.
There are 8 local authorities spending more than £5 million on publicity.
There are 73 local authorities spending more than £2 million on publicity.
There are 141 local authorities spending more than £1 million on publicity.
The total spend on publicity is not broken down in a uniform way in the various local authority accounts. It is possible, however, to identify 44 councils that spend at least £1 million and 4 councils spending at least £2 million on staff recruitment advertising – despite the increased use of websites. If all local authority accounts provided a full breakdown of publicity spending, the number of councils spending at least £1 million on staff advertising would almost certainly increase.
The doubling of average publicity spending per local authority in the last decade is extremely disappointing. There are, however, a number of councils that are actually spending less on publicity than ten years ago. For example:
- Hammersmith and Fulham Borough Council spent £669,000 on publicity in 2006-07, down 11 per cent from the £751,000 spent in 1996-97.
- In 2005-06, however, the council spent £1,030,000 on publicity, meaning that the 1-year fall in spending was 35 per cent.
- If Hammersmith and Fulham can reduce publicity spending by 35 per cent in one year …… make other efficiency savings and reduce council tax by 3 per cent, then it must be possible for other councils to follow suit.
Morg
Monday, 24 November 2008
PROUD TO SHAKE THEIR HANDS
Just got back from the long awaited meeting in St Helens where Arthur Kemp was to speak.
His speech was somewhat similar to the one he made in Wigan which I have recorded to disc.
The main reason I went was to shake the hands of the patriots who were wrongly arrested for distributing the leaflets which were perfectly legal. They contained government statistics only but which illustrated the vastly disproportionate amount of anti white violence when population numbers are taken into consideration.
The government it seems objects to their own figures being widely disseminated.
The police were there having gained the information from the phones and computers of the arrested members. Their houses were searched and wives in some cases frightened.
The Fascist Bastard chief of police is really out to get us, but he will only increase our support.
What they expected to find God only knows! What they found was the usual civilised meeting at a top St Helens restaurant.
We shall be having a BIG rally on Saturday. The meeting point has not been arranged as yet.
Please, as many members as possible come and support us.
We can not afford to lose this fight for our free speech.
There is a possibility of arrests being made of our peaceful protest.
I'M QUITE HAPPY TO BE ARRESTED. WHAT A STORY, "BILLINGE DOCTOR ARRESTED"all over the papers. What publicity! I CAN'T WAIT.
I will of course do nothing unlawful or inconvenience anyone, just UPHOLD MY DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.
On to the budget.
This morning people were interviewed and asked what they wanted most a VAT cut or job security made more secure by cuts in National Insurance. They all, workers and management said job security and insurance cuts.
Cutting VAT will have little effect on job prospects or living standards and only lead to more imports of cheap foreign goods.
What do they get?--
2.5% off VAT, an increase in National Insurance and a 5% rise in income tax for those on over £150,000. Aww, poor dears. As most of the people on this kind of salary are the people who caused this trouble in the first place why did they not start it at say £100,000. I'm sure with effort they could have managed to make ends meet.
Why such a small increase? Because these are the government's friends, the bankers and top civil servants.
Meanwhile people will still lose their houses.
WHAT A SHOWER OF INCOMPETANTS!
His speech was somewhat similar to the one he made in Wigan which I have recorded to disc.
The main reason I went was to shake the hands of the patriots who were wrongly arrested for distributing the leaflets which were perfectly legal. They contained government statistics only but which illustrated the vastly disproportionate amount of anti white violence when population numbers are taken into consideration.
The government it seems objects to their own figures being widely disseminated.
The police were there having gained the information from the phones and computers of the arrested members. Their houses were searched and wives in some cases frightened.
The Fascist Bastard chief of police is really out to get us, but he will only increase our support.
What they expected to find God only knows! What they found was the usual civilised meeting at a top St Helens restaurant.
We shall be having a BIG rally on Saturday. The meeting point has not been arranged as yet.
Please, as many members as possible come and support us.
We can not afford to lose this fight for our free speech.
There is a possibility of arrests being made of our peaceful protest.
I'M QUITE HAPPY TO BE ARRESTED. WHAT A STORY, "BILLINGE DOCTOR ARRESTED"all over the papers. What publicity! I CAN'T WAIT.
I will of course do nothing unlawful or inconvenience anyone, just UPHOLD MY DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.
On to the budget.
This morning people were interviewed and asked what they wanted most a VAT cut or job security made more secure by cuts in National Insurance. They all, workers and management said job security and insurance cuts.
Cutting VAT will have little effect on job prospects or living standards and only lead to more imports of cheap foreign goods.
What do they get?--
2.5% off VAT, an increase in National Insurance and a 5% rise in income tax for those on over £150,000. Aww, poor dears. As most of the people on this kind of salary are the people who caused this trouble in the first place why did they not start it at say £100,000. I'm sure with effort they could have managed to make ends meet.
Why such a small increase? Because these are the government's friends, the bankers and top civil servants.
Meanwhile people will still lose their houses.
WHAT A SHOWER OF INCOMPETANTS!
Sunday, 23 November 2008
SOME INTERESTING WIGAN NUMBERS
All figures are from January 21st 2008. Any pay increases during 2008 are in addition.
Susan Lowe. Director of Legal and Property Services. 2006-2007 Salary - £107,007 (Includes election fees £313)
Bob Saunders. Executive Director (Interim). 2006-2007 Salary - £110,174 (Includes election fees £150)
Martin Kimber. Director of Environmental Services. 2006-2007 Salary - £117,019
Ged Rowney. Director of Children and Young Peoples Services. (2005-2006 Salary - £118,877). 2006-2007 Salary - £126,995. (Pay rise = 6.8%)
Bernard Walker. Director of Adult Services. (2005-2006 Salary - £127,723). 2006-2007 Salary - £131,488. (Pay rise = 2.9%)
David Smith. Director of Finance and IT. (2005-2006 Salary - £122,615). 2006-2007 Salary - £132,871. (Pay rise = 8.4%) (Includes election fees £184; remuneration as Treasurer to Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority £unspecified – So that’s £132,871 for a part-timer. He has two jobs, and has salary in addition to that noted here)
Frank Costello. Deputy Chief Executive. (2005-2006 Salary - £118,863). 2006-2007 Salary - £135,643. (Pay rise = 14.1%) (Includes election fees £313)
Joyce Redfearn. Chief Executive (2005-2006 Salary - £157,918). 2006-2007 Salary - £191,557. (Pay rise = 21.3%) (Includes election fees £6,409; remuneration as Clerk to the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority £unspecified. - So that’s £191,557 for a part-timer. She has two jobs, and has salary in addition to that noted here. And … well…£6,409 in election fees. Speechless!!! I wonder how much the person with REAL responsibility for ensuring the correct and smooth running of elections – Anne Loftus - gets in election fees? A small fraction of that, I would hazard to guess. Yet it’s Anne Loftus’s head that will roll if an election goes pear-shaped).
I’ve lived in Wigan for four and a half years. In that time I’ve never once had cause to complain about my rubbish collection; so in my experiece our dustbinmen do a good job. I wonder how much they get paid and what percentage pay rise they got between 2005-2006 and 2006-2007? Let me hazard another guess here: it was nowhere near £191,557 part-time, and nowhere near a 21.3% pay rise.
And bear in mind that even 100% of next to nothing is still only next to nothing, whereas 10% of two-hundred grand is a considerable salary all on its own.
http://tpa.typepad.com/home/files/council_spending_uncovered_4_town_hall_rich_list_2008.pdf
Morg
Susan Lowe. Director of Legal and Property Services. 2006-2007 Salary - £107,007 (Includes election fees £313)
Bob Saunders. Executive Director (Interim). 2006-2007 Salary - £110,174 (Includes election fees £150)
Martin Kimber. Director of Environmental Services. 2006-2007 Salary - £117,019
Ged Rowney. Director of Children and Young Peoples Services. (2005-2006 Salary - £118,877). 2006-2007 Salary - £126,995. (Pay rise = 6.8%)
Bernard Walker. Director of Adult Services. (2005-2006 Salary - £127,723). 2006-2007 Salary - £131,488. (Pay rise = 2.9%)
David Smith. Director of Finance and IT. (2005-2006 Salary - £122,615). 2006-2007 Salary - £132,871. (Pay rise = 8.4%) (Includes election fees £184; remuneration as Treasurer to Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority £unspecified – So that’s £132,871 for a part-timer. He has two jobs, and has salary in addition to that noted here)
Frank Costello. Deputy Chief Executive. (2005-2006 Salary - £118,863). 2006-2007 Salary - £135,643. (Pay rise = 14.1%) (Includes election fees £313)
Joyce Redfearn. Chief Executive (2005-2006 Salary - £157,918). 2006-2007 Salary - £191,557. (Pay rise = 21.3%) (Includes election fees £6,409; remuneration as Clerk to the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority £unspecified. - So that’s £191,557 for a part-timer. She has two jobs, and has salary in addition to that noted here. And … well…£6,409 in election fees. Speechless!!! I wonder how much the person with REAL responsibility for ensuring the correct and smooth running of elections – Anne Loftus - gets in election fees? A small fraction of that, I would hazard to guess. Yet it’s Anne Loftus’s head that will roll if an election goes pear-shaped).
I’ve lived in Wigan for four and a half years. In that time I’ve never once had cause to complain about my rubbish collection; so in my experiece our dustbinmen do a good job. I wonder how much they get paid and what percentage pay rise they got between 2005-2006 and 2006-2007? Let me hazard another guess here: it was nowhere near £191,557 part-time, and nowhere near a 21.3% pay rise.
And bear in mind that even 100% of next to nothing is still only next to nothing, whereas 10% of two-hundred grand is a considerable salary all on its own.
http://tpa.typepad.com/home/files/council_spending_uncovered_4_town_hall_rich_list_2008.pdf
Morg
Saturday, 22 November 2008
WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!
The arrest this afternoon of eleven of our activists for distributing our perfectly legal pamphlet "Racism cuts both ways" shows what a Stalinist society we are becoming.
The "Stasi" police controlled by this Labour government in persecuting us in this way, think they can prevent our message of truth to be disseminated.
THEY COULD NOT BE MORE WRONG!
Like everything Labour does IT WILL NOT WORK!
WE SHALL CONTINUE to spread our message of truth whatever they do.
THEY CAN'T EVEN CONTROL THE DRUNKEN YOBS ON A SATURDAY NIGHT AND CAN ONLY SOLVE CRIMES IF THEY ARE ADMITTED.
THEY THINK THEY CAN STOP US. Ha ha ha! WE ARE MADE OF STERNER STUFF!
This undemocratic action WILL INVIGORATE US and MAKE US MORE DETERMINED to grasp the baton of freedom handed to us by our forefathers and bought by their blood.
this is a battle we can not afford to lose so--
WE FIGHT ON, AND WE WILL WIN.
A BADGE OF HONOUR.
People have had mixed reactions to being named on our membership list. The vast majority have taken it as a BADGE OF HONOUR to be "outed" as a patriot.
Some have been somewhat disconcerted after having abusive phone calls and e mails.
The remedy for this is to log all phone calls and report any to the police. E mails should be kept and the police informed. They can then send an expert to look at the e mail (and not any private information on your computer) who can then trace the source of the call. If there is any "race hate" in the message they are bound to investigate it.
IT IS ILLEGAL under the DATA PROTECTION ACT to use stolen information in this way.
DON'T BE INTIMIDATED. I say you are only a real member if you have had one.
One member e mailed me and asked if the list could be put up again in case anybody had missed it because---
IT HAD DONE HIS BUSINESS GOOD ,
and he had got more work as a result of his membership being known.
THERE IS A LOT OF SYMPATHY OUT THERE AT THIS PERSECUTION.
People see it as an unjust attack on democracy.
WOULD LABOUR MPS, OF A GOVERNMENT WHICH IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY LIKE THEIR DETAILS WIDELY KNOWN?
YOU BET THEY WOULDN'T they have much to be ashamed about.
WE HAVE NOTHING TO BE ASHAMED OF--
Some have been somewhat disconcerted after having abusive phone calls and e mails.
The remedy for this is to log all phone calls and report any to the police. E mails should be kept and the police informed. They can then send an expert to look at the e mail (and not any private information on your computer) who can then trace the source of the call. If there is any "race hate" in the message they are bound to investigate it.
IT IS ILLEGAL under the DATA PROTECTION ACT to use stolen information in this way.
DON'T BE INTIMIDATED. I say you are only a real member if you have had one.
One member e mailed me and asked if the list could be put up again in case anybody had missed it because---
IT HAD DONE HIS BUSINESS GOOD ,
and he had got more work as a result of his membership being known.
THERE IS A LOT OF SYMPATHY OUT THERE AT THIS PERSECUTION.
People see it as an unjust attack on democracy.
WOULD LABOUR MPS, OF A GOVERNMENT WHICH IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY LIKE THEIR DETAILS WIDELY KNOWN?
YOU BET THEY WOULDN'T they have much to be ashamed about.
WE HAVE NOTHING TO BE ASHAMED OF--
BE PROUD!
A QUESTION OF LOGIC
WHO IS PROHIBITED FROM JOINING THE POLICE?
ANSWER Supporters of this man below who has campaigned for the rights of British people. A man who campaigns against terrorists and has been responsible for NO deaths. A patriot whose aim is to protect the British people.
Supporters of this man are prohibited from joining the police in case the police are considered "racist" and "communities" find his views offensive.
WHO COULD JOIN THE POLICE?ANSWER Supporters of this man below responsible for thousands of deaths. People who support the 9/11 terror attacks and the London bombing. It is rumoured that several supporters of this man are known to be in the Metropolitan Police but they are unable to sack them for fear of allegations of "racism" or offending "communities"
WHICH ORGANISATION IS COMPLETELY "BONKERS" and is betraying the British people who THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO DEFEND?
THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT.
THE LUNATICS HAVE REALLY TAKEN OVER THE ASYLUM!
Friday, 21 November 2008
VOTE NO!
VOTE AGAINST THE CONGESTION CHARGE
The Government says the money made from the congestion charge will pay for better public transport. IT WILL NOT.
Most of the money taken will be used to pay for its collection as was the case in London.
It will cost thousands of people who have to travel to Manchester to work many of whom must use their car as they do not live near bus or train stations, hundreds of pounds per year.
THEY ALREADY PAY £ MILLIONS PER YEAR IN TAXES. THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE PAID FOR OUT OF THAT!
There are billions of pounds available to banks to remedy their inefficiency and greed but working people, struggling to make ends meet are expected to pay even more taxes.
Money paid to the EU and in grants to places like India (awash with millionaires and with a space programme) but not enough for our crumbling infrastructure.
Many of the problems have been caused by bad decisions made by "experts" in the past who decided to separate work areas from residential areas making long distance commuting unavoidable.
They built the first railway in the world to Manchester without taxing the people. They should improve transport links without tax increases now.
If this mad scheme is passed-- DO YOU THINK YOU WILL GET WHAT THEY PROMISED?
NEVER, THEY COULD NOT EVEN BUILD THE DOME EFFICIENTLY.
VOTE NO TO THIS MAD SCHEME.
NEVER HAS THE NEED FOR THE BNP BEEN SO OBVIOUS.
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
POSSIBLY IN THE DAILY MAIL TOMORROW
This afternoon has been extremely busy with phone calls.
After visiting a member I was phoned by a reporter from the Daily Mail regarding the membership leak.
I am always aware of the ulterior motives of the press but thought it better to show that rather than being ashamed of my membership, was proud to be not only a member but the local organiser.
He asked me why the Labour or Tory party was not for me. I told him that I had been a Labour councillor but that the party had lost its way and betrayed its roots and the Tories were out of touch and had no policies.
I asked him that if 10% of the Chinese population (130 million)was suddenly made up of immigrants what would the Chinese do and he agreed it would be a problem.
I told him I sympathised with the Native Americans who had been replaced as well as the Amazonian Indians and said I did not want us to be replaced.
I told him I was not racist and that in the past I had been on holiday with Asians but that we had agreed that this is our country and they should return to their own
I also mentioned the tax regime here which had caused businesses to move abroad and good jobs to be lost here. I had no objections to foreigners coming here to do essential jobs if needed and there were no British people to do them but we should have first choice and citizenship should never be given.
He then asked whether he could take a photo and I agreed as I am proud to represent the Party.
He rang later and spoke to Susan who told him she thought Nick was "marvellous" and the most intelligent politician in Britain. She said she objected to Christmas being replaced by "Winterval" etc and that we are losing our culture and that even her grandson when visiting London remarked that there were no English people.
The photographer then came and took several photos with a George Cross background, after I had combed my hair.
He seemed a reasonable man. I said I expected the usual hatchet job but he said I could complain or sue if I had been misquoted.
So there we have it, possibly in tomorrow's Mail. You heard it here first and the truth of what was said.
I WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED AND WILL SUPPORT THE PARTY I WANT-THE BNP
I think all this could bring us a lot of votes and rebound on the anti British Labour Party.
After visiting a member I was phoned by a reporter from the Daily Mail regarding the membership leak.
I am always aware of the ulterior motives of the press but thought it better to show that rather than being ashamed of my membership, was proud to be not only a member but the local organiser.
He asked me why the Labour or Tory party was not for me. I told him that I had been a Labour councillor but that the party had lost its way and betrayed its roots and the Tories were out of touch and had no policies.
I asked him that if 10% of the Chinese population (130 million)was suddenly made up of immigrants what would the Chinese do and he agreed it would be a problem.
I told him I sympathised with the Native Americans who had been replaced as well as the Amazonian Indians and said I did not want us to be replaced.
I told him I was not racist and that in the past I had been on holiday with Asians but that we had agreed that this is our country and they should return to their own
I also mentioned the tax regime here which had caused businesses to move abroad and good jobs to be lost here. I had no objections to foreigners coming here to do essential jobs if needed and there were no British people to do them but we should have first choice and citizenship should never be given.
He then asked whether he could take a photo and I agreed as I am proud to represent the Party.
He rang later and spoke to Susan who told him she thought Nick was "marvellous" and the most intelligent politician in Britain. She said she objected to Christmas being replaced by "Winterval" etc and that we are losing our culture and that even her grandson when visiting London remarked that there were no English people.
The photographer then came and took several photos with a George Cross background, after I had combed my hair.
He seemed a reasonable man. I said I expected the usual hatchet job but he said I could complain or sue if I had been misquoted.
So there we have it, possibly in tomorrow's Mail. You heard it here first and the truth of what was said.
I WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED AND WILL SUPPORT THE PARTY I WANT-THE BNP
I think all this could bring us a lot of votes and rebound on the anti British Labour Party.
DON'T BE LEFT OUT.
I had phone calls earlier today from people feeling left out. They had had no abusive threatening phone calls from the anti British trash who are trying to intimidate us.
One member who phoned, very disappointed had to be reassured that he would probably get one and I advised him to be patient.
This evening he rung me to say he had had a phone call when one of the bosses at his works was with him and the boss was very impressed.
Our member was elated.
REMEMBER--WITHOUT AN ABUSIVE PHONE CALL YOU HAVE NOT MADE IT TO PROPER MEMBERSHIP.
MY BADGE OF HONOUR-----I'VE HAD TWO.
BREAKING NEWS ON THIS BLOG AFTER 10.30.
DON'T FORGET TO LOG ON LATER TONIGHT.
One member who phoned, very disappointed had to be reassured that he would probably get one and I advised him to be patient.
This evening he rung me to say he had had a phone call when one of the bosses at his works was with him and the boss was very impressed.
Our member was elated.
AVOID DISAPPOINTMENT.
If you have not had an abusive phone call ring Searchlight or one of the local fascist unions. I'm sure they will arrange it.
REMEMBER--WITHOUT AN ABUSIVE PHONE CALL YOU HAVE NOT MADE IT TO PROPER MEMBERSHIP.
MY BADGE OF HONOUR-----I'VE HAD TWO.
BREAKING NEWS ON THIS BLOG AFTER 10.30.
DON'T FORGET TO LOG ON LATER TONIGHT.
Tuesday, 18 November 2008
MORE "ENRICHMENT NEWS"
THE AFTERMATH OF "ENRICHMENT"
Evidence of the "enrichment" of our area was graphically displayed on Sunday morning with the murder by stabbing of an Iraqi immigrant in Ashton. Stabbings seem to be especially associated with the ethnic minorities as evidenced by the stabbing at the O2 "Urban music" awards ( whatever those are) over the weekend.
That is not to say that white Britons do not use knives but the overwhelming majority of these crimes are committed by immigrants. They are prone to resort to stabbing in disputes and can not blame alcohol as they are teetotal or supposed to be.
While ever increasing numbers of these uninvited "guests"keep arriving in our country these incidents will increase and their barbaric ways will be copied by local youth as has happened in London.
Until this insane policy of allowing people into the country who are in effect thugs continues nobody can consider themselves safe.
I know they say they are refugees but no proper checks are made and in any case have crossed several safe countries to get here.
They could be and probably are criminals fleeing justice.
WE MUST BE MAD TO ALLOW THEM IN.
How come many people living in these wild lands do not need to flee? Could it not be that they are safe at home because they are law abiding?
ARTHUR KEMP academic,author and senior BNP member will speak at our November meeting to be held at the usual venue at 8 pm.
He will explain the dangers we as British people face and the need for support for the BNP.
Arthur's talks are always inspirational and people leaving meetings where he has spoken are always uplifted and inspired to strive for the greater good of Britain through our party.
Please come early to ensure a good seat at what promises to be an excellent meeting.
We will start at 8 pm PROMPT.
He will explain the dangers we as British people face and the need for support for the BNP.
Arthur's talks are always inspirational and people leaving meetings where he has spoken are always uplifted and inspired to strive for the greater good of Britain through our party.
Please come early to ensure a good seat at what promises to be an excellent meeting.
We will start at 8 pm PROMPT.
Monday, 17 November 2008
CONFERENCE REPORT.
I am still recovering after a superb conference. Unfortunately we were unable to stay, entailing travelling both days.
Three of us went from Wigan, Me, Susan and Chris Hilton, Gary Chadwick unfortunately being ill.
It was a great pleasure to meet old friends again in the usual friendly and civilised atmosphere prevailing at Conference.
The Saturday was as usual taken up with training seminars and we learnt much about leaflet design, computer use and public speaking. All seminars were presented in an interesting manner, there was no danger of falling asleep but now my job is to remember and put into practice what I learnt.
A full schedule prevented us from attending all the seminars and by "close of play" on Saturday we returned home too tired to even read the paper, knowing we had to be up first thing to return for the debates.
An excellent innovation this year was the proceedings being broadcast on the computer and for a short time before retiring to bed I was able to see what I was missing in the evenings entertainment on the computer.
In the early afternoon the usual march past of assorted deadlegs went by and as usual were ignored. If they were shouting slogans they were wasting their time as they were inaudible inside the hotel. It must be frustrating for them to travel so far to walk past drawn curtains and get no response but the sea air possibly cleared their heads from the effects of the previous day's drugs.
Following Sunday service conducted by Rev West the debates started.
The first motion, put by the chairman which basically stated that we should preserve our national assets and free ourselved from the stranglehold of the banks in order to develop British industry was carried unanimously.
Most motions were carried either unanimously or overwhelmingly indeed it was difficult in some cases to find people to oppose them. That is not to say there was no debate and several amendments were added.
As usual anyone who wished to make a point had the opportunity to do so and the different slants on options alerted us to aspects and implications we had not considered.
For me this is the pleasure of these occasions, being stimulating intellectually and thought providing.
The standard of debate was as good or better than ever and the fact that it was broadcast live showed the confidence of the Party in the quality of its delegates. I did not realise at the time it was being broadcast and was somewhat taken aback when Gary Chadwick said he saw me speak from the comfort of his home. I hope I did not say anything untoward and let Wigan down.
I found myself thinking during the debate whether the other parties could have debated publicly in such an intelligent and civilised manner.
One motion concerning the "Bill of Rights" and the Monarchy was defeated.
As usual, following the debates we were treated to the closing speech by the Chairman who entered the hall to the strains of the hymn "Onward Christian Soldiers" which I thought was very apt. Whatever our individual beliefs we have been formed by the Christian tenets and our laws and society built on them and the singing of the hymn was a demonstration of our British unity.
Nick's speech was as usual inspiring. He referred to the way the banks had become the masters and not the servants of the country and the greed and profligacy perpetrated by them had and would hit all members of our society(apart from the mega rich) and would impact severely on the poor.
He prophesied that we would continue our progress and in a way the financial disaster caused by Brown would help people to see that we are the only party committed to the prosperity of all in our country.
The meeting closed with the usual emotional rendering of "Jerusalem" which always brings tears to my eyes.
P.S I have a DVD of the Leigh meeting and Nick's closing speech (on one DVD) which will be available at Thursday's meeting or by phoning me at the number at the top of the blog.
Three of us went from Wigan, Me, Susan and Chris Hilton, Gary Chadwick unfortunately being ill.
It was a great pleasure to meet old friends again in the usual friendly and civilised atmosphere prevailing at Conference.
The Saturday was as usual taken up with training seminars and we learnt much about leaflet design, computer use and public speaking. All seminars were presented in an interesting manner, there was no danger of falling asleep but now my job is to remember and put into practice what I learnt.
A full schedule prevented us from attending all the seminars and by "close of play" on Saturday we returned home too tired to even read the paper, knowing we had to be up first thing to return for the debates.
An excellent innovation this year was the proceedings being broadcast on the computer and for a short time before retiring to bed I was able to see what I was missing in the evenings entertainment on the computer.
In the early afternoon the usual march past of assorted deadlegs went by and as usual were ignored. If they were shouting slogans they were wasting their time as they were inaudible inside the hotel. It must be frustrating for them to travel so far to walk past drawn curtains and get no response but the sea air possibly cleared their heads from the effects of the previous day's drugs.
Following Sunday service conducted by Rev West the debates started.
The first motion, put by the chairman which basically stated that we should preserve our national assets and free ourselved from the stranglehold of the banks in order to develop British industry was carried unanimously.
Most motions were carried either unanimously or overwhelmingly indeed it was difficult in some cases to find people to oppose them. That is not to say there was no debate and several amendments were added.
As usual anyone who wished to make a point had the opportunity to do so and the different slants on options alerted us to aspects and implications we had not considered.
For me this is the pleasure of these occasions, being stimulating intellectually and thought providing.
The standard of debate was as good or better than ever and the fact that it was broadcast live showed the confidence of the Party in the quality of its delegates. I did not realise at the time it was being broadcast and was somewhat taken aback when Gary Chadwick said he saw me speak from the comfort of his home. I hope I did not say anything untoward and let Wigan down.
I found myself thinking during the debate whether the other parties could have debated publicly in such an intelligent and civilised manner.
One motion concerning the "Bill of Rights" and the Monarchy was defeated.
As usual, following the debates we were treated to the closing speech by the Chairman who entered the hall to the strains of the hymn "Onward Christian Soldiers" which I thought was very apt. Whatever our individual beliefs we have been formed by the Christian tenets and our laws and society built on them and the singing of the hymn was a demonstration of our British unity.
Nick's speech was as usual inspiring. He referred to the way the banks had become the masters and not the servants of the country and the greed and profligacy perpetrated by them had and would hit all members of our society(apart from the mega rich) and would impact severely on the poor.
He prophesied that we would continue our progress and in a way the financial disaster caused by Brown would help people to see that we are the only party committed to the prosperity of all in our country.
The meeting closed with the usual emotional rendering of "Jerusalem" which always brings tears to my eyes.
P.S I have a DVD of the Leigh meeting and Nick's closing speech (on one DVD) which will be available at Thursday's meeting or by phoning me at the number at the top of the blog.
Friday, 14 November 2008
LEIGH MEETING
I was privelidged together with Paul Rimmer to speak at the inaugural meeting of the Leigh branch of Wigan group BNP.
It was a fantastic venue which we easily filled. The response was overwhelming. Never have I seen such enthusiasm shown by people who were not Party members to our message. Many application forms for membership were distributed and addresses taken for future information.
New venues were offered for larger meetings which I am sure we will need in the future if the enthusiasm of last night is anything to go by.
There seemed to be a hunger for a party to represent the interests of ordinary people who feel betrayed by the existing major parties, and who up till now had swallowed the false propaganda about the BNP peddled by the media.
We demonstrated, or tried to that we are not the ogres painted by the press but ordinary people frustrated and annoyed at having our needs ignored and our democracy stolen by those whose only interest in politics is their own financial gain rather than the prosperity of the people and the future of the country.
To me the meeting was a tonic and boosted my determination to continue the good fight,--for our country and people.
Thank you Gary for inviting me!
It was a fantastic venue which we easily filled. The response was overwhelming. Never have I seen such enthusiasm shown by people who were not Party members to our message. Many application forms for membership were distributed and addresses taken for future information.
New venues were offered for larger meetings which I am sure we will need in the future if the enthusiasm of last night is anything to go by.
There seemed to be a hunger for a party to represent the interests of ordinary people who feel betrayed by the existing major parties, and who up till now had swallowed the false propaganda about the BNP peddled by the media.
We demonstrated, or tried to that we are not the ogres painted by the press but ordinary people frustrated and annoyed at having our needs ignored and our democracy stolen by those whose only interest in politics is their own financial gain rather than the prosperity of the people and the future of the country.
To me the meeting was a tonic and boosted my determination to continue the good fight,--for our country and people.
Thank you Gary for inviting me!
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
INAUGURAL LEIGH MEETING
There will be an inaugural meeting of Leigh BNP next Thursday 13 th November at 8 pm.
For further details please ring me on 01744 892430.
We are hoping to build another group in Leigh which up to now has been somewhat neglected but we have information that there is a growing support in the town. We are seeking to counter the misinformation about our party put out by the media, which has it's own agenda to deprive the people of the truth.
We aim to demonstrate the way we have been denied our democratic rights and suggest ways to restore it.
Come and join us if you can!
For further details please ring me on 01744 892430.
We are hoping to build another group in Leigh which up to now has been somewhat neglected but we have information that there is a growing support in the town. We are seeking to counter the misinformation about our party put out by the media, which has it's own agenda to deprive the people of the truth.
We aim to demonstrate the way we have been denied our democratic rights and suggest ways to restore it.
Come and join us if you can!
Monday, 10 November 2008
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
This month is Black history month. All I could find on the internet is the picture below.
Can someone please help. There must be more to it than this. I have made a start with some typical buildings.
Will somebody fill in the rest of the history below.
We should know.
Can someone please help. There must be more to it than this. I have made a start with some typical buildings.
Will somebody fill in the rest of the history below.We should know.
THE MORALITY OF TAKING CARE OF YOUR OWN
For every reference in this article to America and American leaders, just substitute Britain and British leaders.
You wont find much to disagree with. I certainly don’t.
“The moral obligation of an American leader is to look after the well-being of the people of the United States. The moral obligation of a Russian leader is to look after the well-being of the people of Russia. A leader of either country who fails to do these things is acting immorally.
President Bush has acted immorally towards his own people.It is arguable that Vladimir Putin has acted in a more moral fashion with respect to his own people than George W. Bush or Bill Clinton has with respect to Americans. This is because the forty-second and forty-third presidents of the United States placed “international law” ahead of the welfare of Americans.
Not to see this is to be obtuse.
It doesn’t mean that Vladimir Putin is a good person. It doesn’t mean that he hasn’t acted cynically (and against American interests) in Iran and other places. It doesn’t mean that he hasn’t been brutal.
It means that he has taken care of his own.”
Go read it all:
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-russia.html
I can think of only one British political party whose leadership will be sure to take care of its own (people).
What say we all?
Morg
You wont find much to disagree with. I certainly don’t.
“The moral obligation of an American leader is to look after the well-being of the people of the United States. The moral obligation of a Russian leader is to look after the well-being of the people of Russia. A leader of either country who fails to do these things is acting immorally.
President Bush has acted immorally towards his own people.It is arguable that Vladimir Putin has acted in a more moral fashion with respect to his own people than George W. Bush or Bill Clinton has with respect to Americans. This is because the forty-second and forty-third presidents of the United States placed “international law” ahead of the welfare of Americans.
Not to see this is to be obtuse.
It doesn’t mean that Vladimir Putin is a good person. It doesn’t mean that he hasn’t acted cynically (and against American interests) in Iran and other places. It doesn’t mean that he hasn’t been brutal.
It means that he has taken care of his own.”
Go read it all:
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-russia.html
I can think of only one British political party whose leadership will be sure to take care of its own (people).
What say we all?
Morg
Saturday, 8 November 2008
BOYCOTT UNPATRIOTIC SAINSBURYS
People may have seen in the papers or on the BNP website that the boss of Sainsburys has said that buying British food is "simplistic".
I have always noticed that Sainsbury's food adverts have for a long time promoted foreign produce and have avoided them for that reason.
During the farmers protests a few years ago against poor prices paid by the supermarkets we were treated with sympathy and courtesy by other firms. Sainsbury's depot at Haydock however had police in full riot gear with a spotter helicopter and several farmers were lucky not to be run over by a lorry driven by the manager. This was a complete over reaction against protesting farmers who neither did nor threatened violence.
Contrast this with the pussy footing by the police when controlling the anarchist mob outside the RWB in August.
I think this excessive police presence was because Lord Sainsbury was a big Labour donor.
We need a viable food industry in this overpopulated country and firms such as Sainsburys are doing their best to destroy it.
Because of the experience mentioned above I vowed never to shop at their stores again .
I have always suspected that they had a policy of purchasing foreign produce in preference to British and now it has been confirmed.
The boss says purchasing British produce is "simplistic"
I say shopping at Sainsbury's is unpatriotic and definitely simplistic as their prices are much dearer than other supermarkets.
So do your patriotic duty---BOYCOTT SAINSBURY'S, and save money at the same time.
I have always noticed that Sainsbury's food adverts have for a long time promoted foreign produce and have avoided them for that reason.
During the farmers protests a few years ago against poor prices paid by the supermarkets we were treated with sympathy and courtesy by other firms. Sainsbury's depot at Haydock however had police in full riot gear with a spotter helicopter and several farmers were lucky not to be run over by a lorry driven by the manager. This was a complete over reaction against protesting farmers who neither did nor threatened violence.
Contrast this with the pussy footing by the police when controlling the anarchist mob outside the RWB in August.
I think this excessive police presence was because Lord Sainsbury was a big Labour donor.
We need a viable food industry in this overpopulated country and firms such as Sainsburys are doing their best to destroy it.
Because of the experience mentioned above I vowed never to shop at their stores again .
I have always suspected that they had a policy of purchasing foreign produce in preference to British and now it has been confirmed.
The boss says purchasing British produce is "simplistic"
I say shopping at Sainsbury's is unpatriotic and definitely simplistic as their prices are much dearer than other supermarkets.
So do your patriotic duty---BOYCOTT SAINSBURY'S, and save money at the same time.
Wednesday, 5 November 2008
OBAMA WINS.
Barak Obama's win in America is obviously the start of a new era in the "States" and the world.To my mind he was the best candidate of the two on offer. Mc Cain was offering more of the same with a more aggressive warlike foreign policy and he was tainted by the legacy of the idiot George Bush with his disasterous legacy on the financial front and his stupidity in trying to use force to sort Middle East problems. (I have to admit Sarah Palin was a bit of alright in spite of her funny views but not as Vice President)
At least Obama has a chance of portraying a new more tolerant face to America's erstwhile enemies and may do some good abroad.
His problems at home will be more difficult to solve as the expectations of the blacks will be hard to fulfil. I hope he does manage to succeed.
However in spite of what the media says the USA is anything but united. Each of the many ethnic groups has its own agenda which are in many ways irreconcilable and he will be hard pressed to satisfy them all. The thing that united them this election was to get rid of the party to which Bush belonged at any price whatever ethnic group they were.
Of course the BBC gloat that this is not a racist result. So 97% black people voting for Obama is not racial voting? Of course it is.
I don't blame the blacks for voting for a black but the media should admit it for what it is-racist voting. If it was the other way round they would be the first to moan.
I wish him well but a racially mixed society has never worked up to now. Perhaps it will this time but if he fails the consequences could be dire.
A MYSTERY SOLVED, ELLIOT DOES EXIST
Our two intrepid group detectives, Ken and Chris have at last solved the mystery of the elusive Elliot Brown, our local" Hate Crimes Officer".Unexpectedley they found him to be a young white man (presumably indoctrinated by political correctness so that he could land his cushy non job).
They tackled him about the scurrilous racist remarks as above which were sent to You Tube.
He reluctantly contacted the police who then contacted Ken.
The officer concerned agreed that if we had put such a racist comment on a message we would probably have been arrested, thus accepting the double standards applying in these cases. He tried to bring Nick Griffin's remarks into it but it was pointed out that Nick had been aquitted at his trial. He also mentioned my reply for some reason which is not racist in tone at all. Have a look for yourself on the link below.
He says he will get it taken off the You Tube messages.
Well done Ken!
THEY NOW KNOW WE ARE WATCHING THEM and can use the rules which were originally brought in to persecute us against them.
As they say "RACISM CUTS BOTH WAYS"
.
Sunday, 2 November 2008
Message from Morg
My posting will be light for a while.
My keyboard and touchpad are not working properly, and about the best I can do until I've fixed them is post links (I can copy/paste easily enough since I plugged in a mouse to bypass the touchpad). Takes me ages to get the letters to 'take' when I'm trying to write.
I think it's a software problem and I'm trying to find it. I know I could use a separate keyboard to bypass this one, but dammit, I want to fix this one.
A bonus of trying to track down this problem is that while I was at it I found a Data-miner in my machine. It's dead now. Wonder who it is that knows everything I've got on my machine and everywhere I go? Good job I've got no nonce stuff in here eh?
Morg
My keyboard and touchpad are not working properly, and about the best I can do until I've fixed them is post links (I can copy/paste easily enough since I plugged in a mouse to bypass the touchpad). Takes me ages to get the letters to 'take' when I'm trying to write.
I think it's a software problem and I'm trying to find it. I know I could use a separate keyboard to bypass this one, but dammit, I want to fix this one.
A bonus of trying to track down this problem is that while I was at it I found a Data-miner in my machine. It's dead now. Wonder who it is that knows everything I've got on my machine and everywhere I go? Good job I've got no nonce stuff in here eh?
Morg
Saturday, 1 November 2008
BOYCOTT "CHILDREN IN NEED"
In two weeks the annual BBC farce "Children in Need" takes place. It purports to support children but closer examination of causes to which it donates indicate that a large proportion (after large administration costs) goes to helping the children of immigrants, travellers and many in foreign countries. Much of the small part going to British children goes to the NSPCC, notorious for taking children from parents on the slightest pretext, at the instigation of politically correct immature social workers. This causes great injustice and there is no appeal against their decision (remember Cleveland and Rochdale) Cases of genuine abuse are missed.
I used to be a strong supporter of the NSPCC but since the former notorious cases have ceased to fund them. They often do more harm than good.
Charity begins at home!
If you want to give, support the Poppy Day appeal or the local Hospice or any local charity where the money goes direct and cuts out those who make a living out of others generosity---but
DON'T SUPPORT CHILDREN IN NEED,- it's not your British kids who benefit!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)