HAPPY NEW YEAR

So 2010 draws to a close and our new government has shown that it is no different from the others.
Admittedly we had hoped to do better this year but with the media and the big party machines against us we knew it would be an uphill battle.

All the other parties were disappointed. The Tories hoped for outright victory but people could not bring themselves to trust the fake Cameron brand. The Lib Dems also hoped for a better result than they managed, but then a party devoid of policy is hard to vote for.


Labour, in spite of their in effect bankrupting our country and decimating the few remnants of our industries the Tories had not destroyed before them did well to hold as many seats as they did. It demonstrates the sickness of British politics that after a disastrous three periods in power, involvement in illegal wars, terror attacks, industries sold abroad, bankers bail out and massive immigration and consequent unemployment, people could not trust the Tories enough to give them their vote.


Unfortunately on account of the distortions and the assembled might of the other parties and media and in some cases blatant fraud, we were not able to garner as many votes as we had hoped.
I know we had no chance of winning a seat in our area but for the first time we stood three candidates and saved our deposits in all three.
We know our presence is causing some discomfort to our enemies as they know when our message of hope gets through we will gain influence, that is why they spent so much to oppose us.

None the less we had our best national vote which under the present system does not translate into seats. This of course gave the others the chance to gloat which disheartened some of our activists who could not see the progress made, causing internal party friction and a small number left us.


The majority remained committed and many activists are now campaigning in the Oldham bye election, caused as a result illegal election activities by Labour, similar to the tactics which were used in Barking and Dagenham against Nick Griffin by the millionairess Margaret Hodge.
In our case her crime was not known about and her massive majority unassailable as a result of the flooding of the area with immigrants and lies spread about us.

So where do we go now?

Well this coalition government has shown it is just as incompetent, corrupt and as liable to break its promises as the last. Their alliance with those speculators who have sold our country out shown by the knighthood conferred on Roger Carr who sold Cadbury's to Kraft and who now controls Centrica the profiteering gas company, not to mention Heseltine's plea to go easy on the bankers.

The country faces huge economic problems and we are facing a resources crisis, having sold or used all our own. In addition increasing numbers of immigrants are coming here bringing with them the danger of terrorism and the government frightened of tackling the source of the trouble.
I believe we are in for a period of straightened circumstances, and it is not the fault of the British people it is the fault of those who govern us.

Never has there been a more urgent need for a nationalist government than now.
We as patriots must put our squabbles behind us and unite in our cause to save our country and culture.

Concentrate not on what divides us but what unites us. Let bygones be bygones and work together and let's put the fear of God into those selfish corrupt people who are selling out our country.

We are the flame of the British future which will never be extinguished but grow ever stronger.

THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY.

A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL PATRIOTS.

THE DESTRUCTION OF BRITAINS EDUCATION SYSTEM - YOUR CHILDREN BETRAYED

Now we know what BLIAR meant when he said "EDUCATION, EDUCATION, EDUCATION."

It wasn't Education for our Children he meant by that, what he really meant was 'While we have control of the Schools and Teacers through the NUT we can INDOCTRINATE the MULTICULT IDEOLOGY into the CHILDREN, forget their EDUCATION these White kids need to pay the price for the actions of their forfathers, take away their intelligence and capacity to learn, GIVE THEM NO FUTURE.'

Successive governments have caused lasting damage to the education system by prioritising access and social inclusion over a decent grounding in the arts, science, languages and humanities, it was claimed.

David Perks, an author and physics teacher, said a series of “anti-elitist” reforms in recent years have undermined schools’ ability to deliver an old-fashioned liberal education.

Changes to Ofsted inspections, a remodelling of the National Curriculum and reforms to testing and assessment have “led to the complete disintegration of education” in England, he said.

The comments were made in a report published by the Institute of Ideas, an education think-tank.

In a series of high-profile educaiton reforms, the Government plans to increase the number of pupils studying tough subjects up to the age of 16.

Read the rest by clicking anywhere on the article -

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8160745/School-subjects-sidelined-in-drive-to-promote-social-justice.html

Our Childrens futures BETRAYED.

New Labours LISA NANDY and YVONNE FOVARGUE are known for their hard work in the Multi-Cult industry and Social Justice for Immigrants.

Just so you know who to blame for ruining your Childrens Futures.

SPOT THE MISSING WORD ?

Can you spot the MISSING WORD ?

Please read the following article carefully.

Christmas bomb plot: nine men remanded over plan to 'blow up Big Ben and Westminster Abbey'

Nine alleged terrorists plotted a Christmas bombing campaign targeting sites that included the London Stock Exchange and Big Ben, a court heard.

They are alleged to have carried out reconnaissance missions before deciding on their possible targets.

Police were said to have found a list of six sites, including the full postal address of the Stock Exchange, Boris Johnson’s London mayoral office and the US embassy.

Defendants were seen studying the tower of Big Ben, before inspecting Westminster Abbey, the London Eye and the Church of Scientology.

Al-Qaeda inspired books and leaflets, including instructions on making a pipe bomb, were also uncovered during the counter-terrorism operation.

Details of the alleged plot were outlined at City of Westminster magistrates’ court.

The defendants, aged 19 to 28, were charged on Sunday with conspiracy to cause an explosion and conduct in preparation for acts of terrorism, having been arrested during early-morning raids in Cardiff, London and Stoke-on-Trent on Dec 20.

Piers Arnold, prosecuting, said the list of landmarks was found during police searches. “A handwritten note was found next to a computer with six contact details handwritten. They included the name, full address and post codes,” he said.

Among the details were the addresses of the Dean of St Paul’s Chapter House and of two rabbis at separate synagogues.

A reconnaissance trip is alleged to have been made from Trafalgar Square, down Whitehall to Westminster Bridge where Big Ben was studied intently.

A mobile phone had appeared to be raised and pointed towards the clock tower, the court heard.

Westminster Abbey, the Palace of Westminster and the London Eye were also closely examined before the Church of Scientology near Blackfriars was allegedly observed intently for some minutes.

The journey ended with a meal in a McDonald’s fast food restaurant, the court heard.

Police searches are said to have uncovered two issues of the al Qaeda extremist magazine Inspire, which is published in English in Yemen and is aimed at a Western audience. An article in issue one was entitled “How to make a pipe bomb in the kitchen of your mom”, while issue two included “What to expect in jihad” and “Tips for our brothers in the US”.

Other allegedly extremist material found was entitled 39 Ways which said it was intended to help people “serve and participate in jihad”.

Anwar Al-Awlaki, the extremist Yemeni preacher whose teachings support and encourage violent jihad against the West, is alleged to be the inspiration for the plot, the court heard. Between Oct 1 and Dec 20, the men are alleged to have downloaded information from the internet, discussed acts

of terrorism and tested explosives while “unlawfully and maliciously” conspiring to “endanger life or cause serious injury” with one or more explosions.

The first defendants to appear before Chief Magistrate Howard Riddle were Mohammed Chowdhury, 20, and Shah Rahman, 28, from east London.

Mr Chowdhury, wearing a white hooded top with shoulder-length hair and a goatee beard, was the first to confirm his date of birth and home address.

Neither he nor Mr Rahman, dressed in a pale blue T-shirt, black jacket and long beard, showed any emotion as the case against them was explained.

Their behaviour was in sharp contrast to that of Omar Latif and Abdul Miah, who appeared in the dock alongside Gurukanth Desai. Mr Latif, 26, and Mr Miah, 24 whispered and laughed while in the dock, with Mr Latif winking and giving a thumbs up as he was led from the court.

All three, from Cardiff, were in matching dark blue fleeces.

The court heard that Mr Miah, whose wife is expecting a baby in April, and Mr Desai, a 28-year-old father of three, were brothers.

The last four men to appear in court, including the youngest of the group, were from Stoke-on-Trent. Usman Khan, 19, Nazam Hussain, 25, Mohibur Rahman, 26, and Abul Shahjahan, 26, were brought into the dock in pairs, and listened impassively to the court proceedings.

All nine men, who are of Bangladeshi origin, were remanded in custody and are due to appear at the Old Bailey on Jan 14.

The counter-terrorism operation was led by the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit and supported by the Metropolitan Police and South Wales Police. Three other men – two from Cardiff and one from London – were released without charge.

Sue Hemming, head of the Crown Prosecution Service Counter Terrorism Division, said last night: “I have reviewed the evidence provided to me by the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit and I am satisfied it is sufficient for a realistic prospect of conviction, and it is in the public interest that these men should be charged with these offences.”

If you know the answer to this MISSING WORD puzzle please leave your answer in the comments section.

VIEWS OF THE BISHOP OF WINCHESTER - REASONS FOR VOTING BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY ?

The Bishop of Winchester, the Rt Rev Michael Scott-Joynt, warned that the death of “religious literacy” among those who made and administered the law had created an imbalance in the way in which those with faith were treated compared to sexual minorities.

Highlighting the case Gary McFarlane, a relationship counsellor who was sacked by Relate for refusing to give sex therapy to a homosexual couple, he said that the judiciary now went out of its way to protect the rights of minorities.

At the same time, for the first time in British history politicians and judges were largely ignorant of religion and so failed to

appreciate the importance Christians placed on abiding by the scriptures rather than the politically correct values of the secular state.

The Bishop’s concerns were underlined by Lord Woolf, a former Lord Chief Justice, who agreed that in some legal cases the balance had gone “too far” in tipping away from Christians.

His words echo recent warnings from other church leaders about what they perceive as attacks on Christianity.

The critique of the Human Rights Act is likely to fuel the criticism of David Cameron for failing to abide by a pre-election

pledge he made to replace the controversial European rules with a home-grown Bill of Rights.

Other recent high profile legal cases involving Christians include bed and breakfast owners sued for turning away two homosexuals who wished to share a bedroom, and adoption agencies forced by the Government to close their doors after they refused to place children with same sex couples

Bishop Scott-Joynt told the BBC’s World This Weekend: “The problem is that there is a really quite widespread perception among Christians that there is growing up something of an imbalance in the legal position with regard to the freedom of Christians and people of other faiths to pursue the calling of their faith in public life, in public service.

“Probably for the first time in our history there is a widespread lack of religious literacy among those who one way and another hold power and influence, whether it’s Parliament or the media or even, dare I say it, in the judiciary.

”The risk would be that there are increasingly professions where it could be difficult for people who are devoted believers to work in certain of the public services, indeed in Parliament.

“Anybody who is part of the religious community believes that you don’t just hold views, you live them. Manifesting your faith is part of having it and not part of some optional bolt-on.

“Judgement seemed to be following contemporary society, which seems to think that secularist views are statements of the obvious and religious views are notions in the mind. That is the culture in which we are living.

“The judges ought to be religiously literate enough to know that there is an argument behind all this, which can’t simply be settled by the nature of society as it is today.”

Appearing on the same programme, Lord Woolf said that the law should be the same for everyone, regardless of faith or lack of it.

But, he conceded: “We may have gone too far. If the law has gone too far in one direction, then the experience of the law is that it tends to move back.

”The law must be above any sectional interest even if it is an interest of a faith but at the same time it must be aware of the

proper concerns of that faith.

“The law should be developed in ways that, wherever practicable, it allows that faith to be preserved and protected.”

The Bishop’s words echo those of Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, who has put his name to the “I’m Not Ashamed” campaign, which promotes the rights of Christians.

He produced a leaflet earlier this month claiming that Christians of “deep faith” faced discrimination and were “under attack” at the start of a campaign to encourage religious people to “wear their faith with pride”.

The Human Rights Act has come under increasing criticism in recent years for protecting the rights of minorities including criminals over those of the wider population.

Before the general election, Mr Cameron had promised to scrap the Act in favour of a British Bill of Rights, but with the Liberal Democrats supporting the current system, introduced under the last, Labour government, the plans were effectively kicked into the long grass following the formation of the Coalition.

Earlier this month, there was anger after it emerged that a failed Iraqi asylum seeker who killed a 12-year-old girl in a hit and run accident could not be deported because he had fathered children in this country and the Act upheld his right to a family life.

The case followed that of Learco Chindamo, who killed headteacher Phillip Lawrence but escaped deportation to Italy, his country of birth, on the grounds that he had moved to Britain as a child and had a right to remain in this country.

He has since been returnedto jail after allegedly breaching the terms of his licence by being involved in a street robbery.

We know the Lib/Lab/Con won't do anything about this otherwise they would have, instead they LIED to you.

And elsewhere in Governement -

Multi-faith chaplains to make House of Commons more inclusive -

John Bercow has backed the creation of a team of multi-faith chaplains, which will also include representatives of the Hindu, Buddhist and Jainist religions.

Members of the House have expressed surprise at the move, which some have described as "an exercise in politically-correct box ticking".

It could mean that religious leaders of non-Christian faiths will take part in parliamentary ceremonies, though there would need to be constitutional reform to allow them to read the daily prayers.

At present, the Speaker's Chaplain is the only person allowed to say the prayers before each day's sitting and the role has been filled by an Anglican cleric since the office was created in 1660.

The proposal to introduce a multi-faith chaplaincy was made by the current chaplain, the Rev Rose Hudson-Wilkin, who was appointed by Mr Bercow against the wishes of the Very Rev John Hall, the Dean of Westminster.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/8224923/Multi-faith-chaplains-to-make-House-of-Commons-more-inclusive.html

A nice CHRISTMAS gift to the ENEMY WITHIN FROM THE ENEMY WITHIN.

AND FOR THESE REASONS YOU SHOULD BE VOTING FOR THE

BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY.

EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED

http://catosays.blogspot.com/2010/12/french-patience.html

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha  oh sweet jesus that was a good one - totally unexpected.

Morg
.

10 WAYS CHRISTMAS IS GOOD FOR YOU

In case you haven't already seen it ... after a year of putting up with a constant drone from the miserabilist health lobby, here's the perfect Christmas antidote courtesy of Patrick Basham and John Luik.

10 WAYS CHRISTMAS IS GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

1. DRINKING ALCOHOL…

There is overwhelming scientific evidence that moderate drinkers live longer than teetotalers. Moreover, the recent Million Women Study in the UK, which looked at the link between drinking and cancer, found that nondrinking women had a higher incidence of cancer than those women who had one drink a day. American researchers found men consuming two alcoholic drinks a day had a 36 percent less risk of developing diabetes.

2. OVEREATING…

There is considerable evidence that one’s longevity is directly linked to one’s plumpness. In a massive study of weight and mortality, Dr Katherine Flegal from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that the longest lived were not the thin but rather those who were overweight, a finding confirmed in many other studies. Increases in overweight and obesity have been paralleled by falls in US mortality from coronary heart disease and stroke. And life expectancy continues to increase, despite the supposed massive increase in obesity.

3. FATTY FOODS…

British research has found that high-fat cheeses, such as stilton, protect against tooth decay. They are also rich in cholesterol from which the hormones estrogen, testosterone, and progesterone are synthesised. Cholesterol is also essential to the production of vitamin D, which regulates calcium levels. And while at the dining or buffet table, be sure to pile on the turkey. It’s full of tryptophan, which raises the level of serotonin in the brain, which in turn reduces stress, improves mood, and improves sleep patterns.

4. CHOCOLATE…!!!

Few women need a research study to tell them that chocolate boosts mood, activity levels, and even sex drive – well, dark chocolate, anyway. Nevertheless, scientists inform us that dark chocolate may also reduce risk of a stroke or a heart attack. American research published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Science found that cocoa, when consumed at doses equivalent to two dark chocolate bars per day for humans, significantly reduced chemical markers for heart disease in a group of lab animals on a high-fat diet.

5. ENJOY BEING LAZY…

The body uses down-time to repair tissues and rebuild immunity. American researchers have found that unrelieved stress can decrease one’s immunity by up to 40 percent. Consequently, Professor Peter Axt argues that time spent lazing around each day is a better way than exercise to ensure you live longer. In On the Joy of Laziness, Axt writes, ‘We always think we have to be doing something but doing nothing … could be better’.

6. OR, WALK IT OFF…

A post-Christmas dinner walk is almost certain to make one feel better. An article published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice found two dozen physiological ailments and psychological conditions that walking may prevent.

7. ALL IN THE FAMILY…

Spending Christmastime with people one loves – assuming that includes one’s family – can improve one’s mental health. Psychologist Edward Diener’s research has found a very strong connection between research subjects’ unhappiness and their poor social relationships. Economist Andrew Oswald controversially theorises that better family relationships would be far better for societal well-being than a financially richer society.

8. LAUGHTER’S STILL THE BEST MEDICINE…

Whether one finds comic relief in a favourite TV programme or a favourite relative, American researchers have found that laughter boosts one’s immune system, reduces tension and stress levels, exercises one’s heart, and releases feel-good hormones in the brain.

9. KEEP THE CARDS COMING…

For most of us, our mood improves when we receive a Christmas card. American research has found that the more Christmas cards we receive, the higher our self-esteem and the better our mood.

10. POWER OF PRAYER…

‘Tis the politically incorrect season, so we would be amiss to ignore a study recently published in the British Medical Journal that found the act of praying slows down one’s breathing rate and has a calming effect on the heart.

http://dickpuddlecote.blogspot.com/2010/12/10-ways-christmas-is-good-for-you.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DickPuddlecote+%28Dick+Puddlecote%29

Morg
.

MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM ALL AT WIGAN PATRIOT

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL OUR READERS FROM ALL AT WIGAN PATRIOT

ABSOLUTE POWER---?

The news that the silly old fool Vince Cable had been conned by some pretty young reporters into admitting his dislike of the Rupert Murdoch has ruffled a few Tory feathers.
If it had been some other Limp Dem MPs no doubt a young male reporter would have been used.


Cameron was outraged by Cable's statement and demoted him.
Milliband called for him to be sacked.


Why all this consternation about a minister's opinion of a newspaper owner? It is because the politicians of Labour and the Tories are fearful of Murdoch's power.
This antipodean tycoon at present residing in the USA and having no allegience to any country or cause except his own power, controls much of the media output in Britain and is not reluctant to use this power to further his own interests.
Owning the "Sun" "News of the World", "Times" and much of Sky television his opinion can make or break a political party. No wonder they are so frightened of him.


Tony Blair jetted across America to see him and Cameron has entertained him, but is this concentration of power and influence in one person's hands healthy for democracy?
Seeing the sales of his increasingly downmarket news rags fall he is trying to gain more influence in television to push his anti British views.

Cable's replacement in the negotiations, Jeremy Hunt is known to be a big fan of Murdoch's and no doubt will favour the sharp operating Murdoch in his bid to control the parts of Sky he does not already own.

That the sting was sprung by the Telegraph shows that they realise that the increasing power of the Murdoch conglomerate is a threat to their business and was thus for somewhat self preservation reasons.

BUT, whatever the Telegraph's motives the fact remains that a monopoly of the media is not in the interests of the British people and the major parties are afraid to tackle this ruthless boss of an internationalist nepotistic media empire.

"A DEEP FOREBODING"

THE DANGER OF ISLAM

The dangers of the adherents of this pre medieval barbaric superstition have been shown many times in recent years with bomb attacks the grooming of teenage girls and their general terrorist activities for which they avoid arrest and deportation with impunity using the notorious "Human Rights Act".

This ill thought out act only gives protection to those who wish us harm but leaves us vulnerable.
So frightened are the authorities of these alien terrorists that when an outrage occurs they reassure "the muslim communities" with our taxpayers cash to attempt to bribe them to desist from further terrorist activities but this furthers muslim contempt for us.

Representitives of this alien creed are promoted to positions of power and influence, not on merit but solely on account of their adherence to this creed. It is tokenism at its worst and most dangerous.

As Nationalists we prefer to live among our own European kind but can work sometimes with those of African or Indian origin and even tolerate some who have become integrated and who are no great threat to our society so long as the numbers are kept small.

However with muslims it is a different matter. These aliens do not want to integrate or cooperate, THEY SAY THEY WILL TAKE OVER.

"Islam will rule the world" they say, and all over the world they are actively working to this end.

If you look at the globe, you will see that wherever, without exception islam comes into contact with more gentle or civilised cultures there is strife.

In our country they are coming in increasingly large numbers to suck at the teat of the Welfare State while they continue their programming of outbreeding us.

Even Colonel Gadaffi stated that islam would triumph in Europe as they would outbreed us.

Nick Griffin was lucky to escape jail for being secretly recorded at a private meeting that it is a wicked vicious faith, merely a true interpretations of the facts.

Draw a picture of their paedophile prophet and all Hell breaks loose with death and destruction.

Of course they can threaten death to us in safety while the police arrest those English people who protest.

Convert from islam to another faith, that's a death sentence.

Homosexual,? get thrown off a cliff.

Commit adultery, stoning if you are a woman (even though you were raped)

How much more evidence do our government need that it is a wicked vicious faith,given that 30% of young muslims in Britain believe that killing is justified for their faith?

The trouble is that their numbers are growing exponentially as a result of illegal immigration and their rapid breeding. It is estimated that there are over 2 million muslims in Britain(I think many more). So that means there are 600,000 of them willing to kill us.

Daily they are becoming more vociferous in their demands and open in their contempt for us.

Today I read that the above poster has been put in some areas with the intent of stopping Christmas.

SOME HOPE!

While I agree that Christmas has lost some of its religious flavour it remains a central part of the Christian culture where people celebrate their faith and cement family ties. It is a time of giving and friendship.

How dare these uppity foreigners try to curtail our traditional customs.

The thought that they are predicted on present trends to increase ten fold within 2 decades fills me with dread. What will they be like when the are the majority in all our major cities and can out vote us.

Our country is indeed in mortal danger and still the government will not act.

So what can be done?

Well for a start anybody who has entered the country illegally in the last 10 years should be expelled immediately or as soon as possible together with any British slags who have had children with them and these children.

Of course all benefits to immigrants should be stopped. Think how much money that would save.

All aspects of our country which make them more comfortable such as new mosques and islamic schools should be prohibited, after all Christian churches are not allowed in Saudi Arabia.

All special concessions such as muslim toilets, islamic burial and the wearing of their ugly clothes should cease.

That would be a start. We would have to see how it went on after that and if further measures were needed.

Will it happen? Not while we are in the EU and no doubt that body would put sanctions in place against us. But Russia has a lot of trouble with islamic militants and would make a good ally.

It is said that all muslims are not extremists and I would accept that, but if over 600,000 would kill us for their religion how would we identify the dangerous ones? Therefore the only safe long term goal would be to rid our country of this dangerous group.

If we don't the only two possibilities are being dominated by them or civil war.

Or do our government want these scenarios?

Sometimes I wonder.

WIKILEAKS - 1-IN-3 MUSLIM STUDENTS IN BRITAIN SUPPORT KILLING FOR ISLAM - 40% WANT SHARIA.

Around a third of young British Muslims favour killing in the name of Islam, according to a survey revealed by the WikiLeaks' publication of U.S. diplomatic cables.

A survey of 600 Muslim students at 30 universities throughout Britain found that 32 per cent of Muslim respondents believed killing in the name of religion is justified.

A U.S. diplomatic cable from January 2009 quoted a poll by the Centre for Social Cohesion as saying 54 per cent wanted a Muslim party to represent their world view in Parliament and 40 per cent want Muslims in the UK to be under Sharia law.

THAT'LL BE THE RELIGION OF PEACE THEN ?

Muslims were also found to have the highest disability rates - with 24 per cent of men and 21 per cent of women claiming a disability - while the cable also cited statistics claiming Muslims were also the most likely group to be unavailable for work or not actively seeking employment due to illness, their studies or family commitments.

With nearly ALL Doctors assesing and deciding DLA claims no wonder they get what we can't.
I wonder how many people entitled to DLA who are not of an Islamic bent are refused on Religious and Racial Hatred Grounds against the INFIDEL ?

THAT'LL BE THE SCROUNGING UNGRATEFUL SCUM THEN ?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/WikiLeaks-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html

LEGALISED MASS MURDER OF THE UNBORN

We are forever being told that we need IMMIGRANTS to work to pay for our ever growing PENSIONER POPULATION, yet we can murder through ABORTION the NATURAL INDIGENOUS REPLACEMENTS FOR OUR PENSIONERS.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics indicated 42.4 per cent of all pregnancies to women under the age of 20 ended in a legal abortion in 2008. This compares with 37.8 per cent a decade ago.

Experts said that though some progress had been made in halting Britain's alarming rate of teen pregnancies, abortion was increasingly seen as the major method of contraception for many young women.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/8155092/Abortion-rates-for-under-20s-shoots-up.html

We are supposed to be unable to replace our AGED POPULATION with INDIGENOUS YOUNGSTERS yet we are always told we have the HIGHEST TEENAGE PREGNANCIES IN EUROPE.
It seems we are not being allowed to replace ourselves, which we obviously can, the TRAITORS allow the MURDER OF THE (mainly Indigenous) UNBORN.

THIS SICKENS ME - IF THE NAZIS HAD BEEN TERMINATING UNBORN CHILDREN ON THIS SCALE THROUGH ABORTION IT WOULD NOW BE CATEGORISED AS A WAR CRIME.

The leaders of this country have created this through creating LAWS to allow it, what does that say about them and us that we accept ABORTION as the NORM ?

PS, The New labour MP for MAKERFIELD, yvonne fovargue (Who She ?) SUPPORTS ABORTION.

MORE INJUSTICE FROM THE EHRC

The State sponsored quango has been at it again.
They have supported a prosecution by two homosexuals who were denied a double bed in a hotel in the West Country on the grounds that they were not married and thus were "homophobic"
No mention of the fact that unmarried heterosexual couples would also not be allowed to sleep together in their hotel.
Now I am no prude and would have no objections to unmarried couples sleeping together. Indeed how many people nowadays keep their sex until marriage? Very few I suspect and certainly not me.

BUT the fact remains that this hotel belongs to this couple and they should be allowed to make their rules in their own establishment however much others may disagree with these rules.
It has been said that if this couple are running a commercial hotel they should accept all people and lifestyles.

I disagree.
If I turned up to the Savoy in London in my working gear I would not be allowed in. The hotel has its standards and we all accept them. Many restaurants do not allow people in jeans to dine there, indeed I have been refused entry to a club on that account.

Some hotels are temperance with alcohol prohibited. Fair enough, these are their rules and if I don't like them (I dont) I am free to go elsewhere, and I do.
Similarly the West Country hotel proprieters should be allowed their standards whether the Equalities Commission likes it or not, and if homosexuals wish to bed each other they should find a hotel willing to accomodate them. Indeed many hotels are run by homosexuals so it should not be too difficult to find one.

And that is the trouble with this overpaid State subsidised busybodies. They want to dictate the behaviour of everybody, and even their thoughts.
Basically if your rules and beliefs are not politically correct you are likely to be sued and even bankrupted.

This in a way mirrors the way in which they objected to the British National Party policies, because they did not like them, and therefore they tried to bankrupt us.
It demonstrates their attitude to freedom of concience and belief. They have none,and they will push the views of the minority over those of the vast majority of the British people.

We nowadays have to watch what we say in case we offend some alien group and are prosecuted for our free speech while aliens can preach death to us with impunity.
It is ironic that the same organisation which persecutes Christian people for their beliefs on homosexuality supports the rights of those who preach that these same homosexuals should be put to death.

It is time that this expensive anti freedom organisation was scrapped but I doubt that even with all the economies which must be made it will happen.
To many of the governing elite are involved in it and are using it as a tool to suppress our freedoms.

When will the people wake up?

A VICTORY FOR FREEDOM

Good news at last.
The government sponsored and subsidised Equalities Commission lost in their efforts to destroy our party.
It is ironic that we supporters and members of the British National Party have to pay our taxes to support an organisation dedicated to destroying us and our rights to have a voice.
It is even more offensive that many of the members of this overpaid quango are of foreign origin from their chairman Phillips down. Those not foreign are without exception people with impeccable leftist credentials who view the British people as an obstacle to their multiculti agenda.

We were told as children that we lived in a democracy which protected the right to free speech.
Now we are not allowed to complain about the colonisation of our country except in the most guarded terms. However as Nick Griffin said they can ot stop us thinking unallowed non PC thoughts.
Which other country would gag its inhabitants who wished to protect their standards and customs?
Which other country would subsidise a body led by foreigners to persecute the native people and force on them their agenda?

I can understand why the people on this anti British quango feel as they do. Many of them are not British and thus they look at things from a different viewpoint.
But the fact is that this is OUR country and our wishes should be paramount.

What I can't understand is why our government gave them so much power.
There can be no other reason other than our governing elite wish to destroy our way of life, one that has served us well for centuries and through many threats and turmoils.
Now this government subsidised quango wanted us as a party to open our membership to those who opposed our principles and ideals and tried to bankrupt us for not rolling over and accepting this.

They really are traitors to the British people.

Thank God that the judges have SOME sense of justice and impartiality.

IS IT A GOOD IDEA?

I know many of you will not agree with me but I think Bob Ainsworth's idea of decriminalising drugs could be a good idea.

I think that if drugs were made available cheaply on prescription it would kill the drug trade stone dead.
It would remove the profit motive and pushers would have no incentive to ply their evil trade. I think it is this pushing which causes many people to start taking drugs and afterwards addicts steal to feed their habit.
These drugs are cheap to manufacture. The cost on the street is due to scarcity caused by the prohibition.
People under the influence of drugs would be prosecuted severely especially if they caused bother and if they did become addicted it would be made clear they would be taken to a spartan detox centre.
If people under this "liberal"regime wish to take harmful substances it should be at their own risk. It is not for the nanny state to look after foolish people.

In recent years when a drug has been banned it becomes more expensive and often popular and when unavailable other substances take over. Also in times past cocaine and opiates were available over the counter and there was no real problem.
This regime I think in removing the incentive in the selling of drugs would do much to reduce drug taking, robbery and best of all the massive amounts made by Asian heroin pushers who use their ill gotten gains to fund terrorism.

Look what happened in the USA with prohibition.

THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR COUNTRY

At one time in the words of Victor Meldrew I would have said "I can't believe it"
Unfortunately nowadays I can believe anything that our rulers do to destroy our country.
As the last Harriers flew off into oblivion or more likely another country in receipt of our foreign aid while we have carriers mothballed,we are informed that in the interests of economy lollipop ladies and men are to be scrapped in some areas. This "improvement" in efficiency will no doubt spread.

How far have we sunk since I was a child in the Forties.
Then there was less money around but everybody worked. There was no "underclass", just honest working people. We had Spitfires and a powerful Royal Navy.
We were self sufficient in energy and manufactures and the greedy bankers had not got their claws into our national wealth.

We had no lollipop people then. Every day at school turning out time (4 pm then) the local police sergeant came up from the police station to escort us across the road. Yes in those days we had local bobbies in whom we were in awe and whose orders had to be obeyed.
We had little traffic in those days and indeed in my village I remember playing football in a B road. But even with so little traffic it was considered important to protect children crossing the main street.
Now, in spite of all the progress and exponential increase in traffic it seems that escorting children across the much busier roads by people on a low wage is unaffordable.

What is affordable is benefits to foreigners who send money back to their countries and who are hailed as heroes by Harriet Harman. Also affordable is legal aid for prisoners in jail to make spurious allegations such as the postman convicted of murder to sue the Post Office for wrongful dismissal even though he will be incarcerated for fifteen years.
Also protected are the many "non jobs" such as diversity officers and health co ordinators whose numbers seem to increase annually.

I believe taxpayers pay their taxes willingly (unless they are Tory donors) but want them to fund those things they think matter.
It is time that our rulers spent our money in the way WE wish in the defence of our country and the safety of our children.

We pay the taxes and they should be used for OUR benefit and not the dross of the world.
Is that not fair? Of course it is but those in power have no concept of fairness.

If we, the ordinary British people are not heard and considered someday, perhaps not so far in the future the pot of our anger will boil over and THEY will feel the consequences.

The people are in a mood for revolt and it will not be the "mummy's boys" of the middle class students who will be revolting, so BEWARE.

THE INEVITABLE

http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2010/12/this-is-inevitable.html

This is inevitable
In the Telegraph: German man castrates teenage daughter's 57-year-old boyfriend.

Helmut Seifert, 47, an ethnic German originally from Russia, was enraged when he heard his 17-year-old daughter was having a relationship with Phillip Genscher, 57.

He went to police in the town of Bielefeld where he lives but officers said they were powerless to intervene.

"The man then recruited two work colleagues at his factory and then went to the house of the victim," said police.

"The man was forced to remove his trousers and, fully conscious, he was castrated. The severed testicles were taken away by the perpetrator."

The man was close to bleeding to death but managed to call police. His life was saved but he remains a eunuch for life.

Seifert pleaded guilty and will be on trial for attempted murder next year. But he has remained silent on who his accomplices were.

He told police: "I received a phone call anonymously that my daughter was involved with a guy 40 years older than her. You said you couldn't stop him – so I did.

"I saw it as my duty as a father."

(emphasis mine)

There are so many things wrong with this. And yet... I don't know I wouldn't have wanted to do the same thing, if presented with the same situation.

One thing struck me, though. That is the highlighted sentence: 'You said you couldn't stop him – so I did'. As our governments continue to dishonour the social contract, we inevitably are going to see (and maybe even do) more of this.

aS THE AUTHORITIES DEVIATE MORE AND MORE FROM THEIR PRIMARY DUTY - WHICH IS TO DEFEND US - WE'LL SEE MORE AND MORE OF THIS SORT OF STUFF AS PEOPLE GET DESPERATE TO DEFEND THEIR OWN. And the media and politicians will pretend to be surprised. It wasn't us that broke the social contract.

Islam will learn a similar lesson: but that will be hard work because whatever we might say about Islam - and I say plenty - it does at least still have its balls.

Morg

OUR ADRENALIN FIX

We returned last night from our British National Party conference tired but elated.
The venue was excellent with superb accomodation, catering and a very efficient and friendly staff protected by our stalwarts in security.
Yes it was expensive but what you paid was what you got and we got a lot, and the package was value for money.

There were I'm told sixteen of the great unwashed outside protesting at our right to hold a party conference and general get together.
They were of no consequence and we were not aware of them until we went outside during a break. These antidemocratic mummy's boys and leftie lecturers were protected by the police from coming into contact with our security staff who would have easily coped with them.

I went to the conference with many questions I wanted answered and indeed had written letters requesting these answers, and I thought possibly I would be in trouble for pushing my questions.
In the event my queries and doubts were answered without my asking them, and I realise that much of the trouble in the Party has been caused by people who now we are thankfully rid of.

There was gross inefficiency in the party management most of it perpetrated by those who have now left and we are now on a sound financial footing.
We have voted on a new party structure which will bring a more democratic system than we had previously and indeed than other parties have. Of course this will take a few months to set up but basically it means that all active groups and branches will have an input into Party management.

The policy debates were as usual hard argued with everybody having a chance to have their say. This to me is one of the highlights of these conferences and an indication of our democratic credentials.

Nick's final speech as usual was superb. I don't know how he does it but hearing him speak is like a shot of adrenalin which invigorates and is sometimes necessary for oldies like me.

The Christmas dinner on Saturday night was excellent with good natured leg pulling and craic. Unfortunately we left early 11 pm as we, enthusiastic as we are are getting too old for late night revelry had to call it a night after one short dance.
Some of the younger ones continued for longer causing one organiser to present himself minus his voice on Sunday morning.

So in a nutshell a very enjoyable if tiring weekend, meeting old friends, really getting to the root of any internal problems, and sorting them and without the would be demagogues we had in the past who have shown over the last year their true colours.
Now we realise how much better we are without them, and how our party has progressed over the last few years.

I just wish the general public could have seen us there as we truly are. We would form the next government but then we have the vested interests of the global capitalists against us and always seek to distort our message.

Next year I will try to arrange for more of our local activists to attend and sod the costs so they can get their adrenalin fix, but then we would have to have an even bigger venue.

The best conference ever.

Onwards and upwards.

YVONNE FOVARGUE MAKERFIELD MP - RUBS THE NOSES OF THE BOROUGH'S BELEAGUERED HARD WORKING - AS THE LABOUR PARTY CONTINUE IN THIER PIT OF CONTEMPT!

Makerfield MP - Yvonne Helen Fovargue
(I'm doing nothing wrong....am I?)

A few posts earlier we published the list of parliamentary expenses claimed to date by one of our local MP's Lisa "Is She or Isn't She" Nandy. (And thanks must go to the Guido Fawkes Blog and also one of our anonymous readers to putting us onto this.)

Well, as I stated I would - I have now imported the full list of expenses claims to-date by another Wigan Borough snout in the trough and Makerfield MP - Yvonne Fovargue for you to muse and ponder over. You will note that it only shows expenses claims up to the month of July which makes it all the more appalling. (I'm wondering if the claims are released on a quarterly basis?).

Have these damn people no damn shame at all? They've been half heartedly dragged over the coals for fraudulent claims and with a few being prosecuted, and yet they still have the audacity to continue to bleed us dry!! Anyway, why aren't the masked thugs, anarchists, and British hating scum not rioting on the streets over the blatant theft from the public purse? Surely, if we stopped the "fingers in the till" fervour of all our contributed billions of pounds each year by our elected low life and thieving politicians this would certainly ease the tuition fee's dilemma wouldn't it? Or, is that just too simple a solution to not a very complicated issue?

It makes hard reading when you see that the cow Fovargue has claimed not only for a TV Licence but also for her house contents insurance and other "you are now really taking the piss out of me" claims!
It looks like a couple of the claims below may have been duplicated? I wonder if the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority are aware of this? (E-mail on it's way.)

Makerfield MP - Yvonne Helen Fovargue

Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Accommodation Rent	01/07/2010	£141.04
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Accommodation Rent	01/07/2010	£1,430.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Accommodation Rent	01/07/2010	£1,430.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Home Contents Insurance	01/07/2010	£77.42
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Interim Hotel London Area	20/05/2010	£387.75
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Interim Hotel London Area	28/05/2010	£517.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Telephone Usage/Rental	01/07/2010	£7.69
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Accommodation	Television Licence	01/07/2010	£145.50
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	General Admin	Payment Telephone/Mobile	09/05/2010	£9.36
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	General Admin	Payment Telephone/Mobile	07/06/2010	£28.26
First 1 2 3 Next Last

Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	General Admin	Payment Telephone/Mobile	07/07/2010	£30.88
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Food & Drink @ Parliament	01/07/2010	£5.25
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Food & Drink @ Parliament	01/07/2010	£9.20
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Food & Drink @ Parliament	01/07/2010	£7.65
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Own Car MP	28/05/2010	£76.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - RTN	28/05/2010	£245.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - SGL	28/05/2010	£124.50
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - SGL	28/05/2010	£45.50
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - SGL	10/06/2010	£33.10
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - SGL	10/06/2010	£99.00

Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - SGL	10/06/2010	£99.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - SGL	10/06/2010	£74.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Public Tr RAIL - SGL	17/06/2010	£99.00
Yvonne Fovargue	Makerfield CC	Travel	Taxi After Late Sitting	21/07/2010	£10.40
First Previous 1 2 3 Last

Total for this search = £5,132.50

Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Accommodation Rent
Amount £1,430.00
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details Rent 28.5.10 - 27.6.2010

Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Accommodation Rent
Amount £1,430.00
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details Rent for July 2010

Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Accommodation Rent
Amount £141.04
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details Pro-rata Rent 28.6.10 - 30.6.10
Travel
Nights
Mileage

Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Home Contents Insurance
Amount £77.42
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details for period 1.6.2010 to 31.5.2011

Claim Ref. No. 4908
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Interim Hotel London Area
Amount £387.75
Transaction Date 20/05/2010
Short Description
Details [***] 17th, 18th and 19th May 2010

Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Television Licence
Amount £145.50
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details TV licence fee valid until 31.5.2011

Claim Ref. No. 21129
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Travel
Expense Type Taxi After Late Sitting
Amount £10.40
Transaction Date 21/07/2010
Short Description
Details House sat after 11.15p.m

Claim Ref. No. 11375
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Travel
Expense Type Public Tr RAIL - SGL
Amount £99.00
Transaction Date 10/06/2010
Journey Type Westminster to Const Office
Journey Euston to Wigan
Short Description Travel Card - Rail 28/5 -17/6
Details HILLGATE TRAVEL /LDN/P [***]
Travel First
Nights
Mileage

Claim Ref. No. 11375
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Travel
Expense Type Public Tr RAIL - SGL
Amount £74.00
Transaction Date 10/06/2010
Journey Type Const Office to Westminster
JourneyMileage Wigan to Euston
Short Description Travel Card - Rail 28/5 -17/6
Details HILLGATE TRAVEL /LDN/P [***]
Travel First
Nights