And yes ... I'm aware of Lancashire sensitivities. But good sense is good sense wherever you hear it from.
http://madeinyorkshire.blogspot.com/2009/03/10-good-reasons-to-vote-for-your-local.html
10 good reasons to vote for your local BNP candidate
1) When a BNP councillor or councillors are elected in your ward the government will usually suspend sending any more asylum seekers and immigrants to your area under the government’s asylum seekers dispersal policy. This means you will then have to pay less council tax, as the support services for those asylum seekers such as language translation services and social services are not required. It also means that demand for local council housing is reduced and local families have a far better chance of getting a council house. It also means waiting time for hospital and doctors appointments are reduced as the extra demand placed on the NHS and welfare services by immigrants and asylum seekers are also reduced. Local schools also do not have to spend money on extra teaching costs for teaching immigrant children English lessons and this money can be spent on trying to raise the educational achievements of local children instead.
2) When a BNP councillor sits on your local council then they can act to prevent the abuse of your council tax when politically correct councils try and spend it on things like building caravan parks for travellers and funding festivals to celebrate alien and ethnic religions and festivals. You will also find that your local politically correct council will suddenly find a renewed interest in holding a St. Georges Day festival and flying the British and English flags from council buildings as a way to ’reclaim the flags and St. Georges Day from the Far Right’.
3) Your local BNP councillors on your council can also monitor and whistle-blow to the public the incompetence, corruption and politically correct nonsense that councils regularly indulge in. They reveal the dodgy deals in your local councils between the corrupt establishment parties, and will act as guardians of the public interest. Many local council have been run by the same corrupt cabals of local politicians that are as corrupt as any Third World state, with council officers being paid bungs by local builders to get planning permission, and a myriad of other scams. A few BNP councillors on a local council means this corruption usually stops, as they know that finally someone who is not part of the cabal of crooks is watching them.
4) Your local BNP councillors will publicise and organise public protests about any insane politically correct spending plans that councils draft up in their smoke-free back rooms behind drawn curtains and out of public scrutiny. They will ensure that the millions spent yearly by councils on race relations courses, race advisers, lifestyle, sexuality and transexual lifestyle advisers, and the rest of the parasites of the politically correct race relations industry are not funded with your council tax. They will resist all attempts by corrupt councils to cut services for local people and spend council tax on assisting asylum seekers and immigrants. For the BNP, putting local people first is the entire basis of our existence.
5) Once a BNP councillor is elected you will find that the politically correct police in your area suddenly start taking seriously, race attacks against whites in the area. They will also start to arrest ethnic criminals for a change instead of treating them with kid gloves out of fear of being called ’racist’. The police will start to monitor and record race attacks against local white people in an area where before they will not have even bothered to acknowledge that such race attacks even exist. Local white people will suddenly find that the police have as much interest in protecting their community from race attacks as they do protecting all other communities from race attacks. The police will not be so politically correct and will start deal with crime faster and more efficiently.
6) Once the BNP become a major force on your local council, such as in Barking and Dagenham, then you will find that the government will give those local councils millions and millions of pounds in grants, funds and loans so as to build new council housing in order to try and undermine the social problems such as a lack of council housing that led to a BNP rise in support in the first place. The government becomes so worried about the rise in BNP support that they suddenly become interested in those areas and re-direct regeneration grants into that area in order to try and ensure the BNP do not keep getting re-elected back into power. You will find that local councils suddenly find the money to buy private houses from private landlords in order to increase the amount of council housing stock, and that council land which was once abandoned is now targeted for new council homes. Vote BNP and government money pours into your area in order to ensure that you do not vote BNP again in the future.
7) Once an area has become known as an area with a BNP presence and support, then ethnic crime gangs do not move into those areas. This means that you and your families are less likely to be the victims of immigrant crime, your house insurance costs will fall, and local families can stay in an area instead of it being turned into an ethnic ghetto. Whilst the government and the politicians all talk about how immigrants ‘enrich’ our nation and communities, it is interesting that those white politicians do not live in areas where such enrichment is usually experienced. As the old saying goes ’ A supporter of multiculturalism is someone who hasn’t been mugged yet’.
8) When an area gets a BNP councillor you will see that money taken from council budgets and spent on perks and junkets for councillors and council staffs are radically reduced. The cosy little trips abroad on “fact-finding missions” and the endless executive lunches usually suffer an instant reduction when they know that a BNP councillor is available to check the council costs and bills. This money saved from being spent on council junkets can then be spent on local services and local people.
9) A BNP councillor can also act as the independent voice of local people in the internal council processes and procedures. Many councils are vast, bloated monstrosities, and run like Soviet Union style beauracracies. They are hostile to the people who pay for them and are arrogant and out of touch. They no longer serve their communities and instead simply treat local people as cash-cows to be milked dry of council tax. BNP councillors are on YOUR side, not on the side of the corrupt councils. We are here to represent you and common sense, not the cosy consensus and political correctness. A BNP councillor represents the voice of the silent majority, and will act to ensure that the councils serve the people not the people serve the councils.
10) A BNP council is a council of common sense and fair play, simply because the interests of local people are also the interests of the BNP. The BNP is not part of the old political Left/ Liberal / Right party game like the establishment parties as the BNP represents the interests of all the British people, not factions, donors and classes. The old parties of the Tories, Labour and Liberals, are all monstrous party political machines. They are millions of pounds in debt and are run and controlled by their crooked donors and backers. The BNP is not funded by foreigners, crooks and criminals like the establishment parties and is instead funded by its members and ordinary British people. This means we are not under the control of those corrupt donors who fund the establishment political parties, and this means we will run our councils for the benefit of you and not our backers and funders.
http://madeinyorkshire.blogspot.com/2009/03/10-good-reasons-to-vote-for-your-local.html
All lessons of experience from those places where BNP councillors have started getting elected.
The three main parties are all in it together, and are even in bed FORMALLY with the Communist Party, as I will prove in my next post. So ...
... if you want change, then the only way to get it is to VOTE BNP.
Morg
.
Tuesday, 31 March 2009
Sunday, 29 March 2009
A SHARED BELIEF!
What have these images in common?The people associated with them it has been said would all have supported the BNP
Winston Curchill expressed views which were identical to those of the BNP.
Keir Hardie, the founder of the Labour Party (the real one not the shower in power now) had similar views on the threat to our people as we do.
The cutting is from today's Sunday Times reviewing a book on his life.
The Spitfire needs no explanation. It protected us from certain defeat at the hands of the Nazis in the battle of Britain.
What is not generally known that we have as members, three of the brave former Spitfire pilots who risked their lives to defend us from invasion.
These elderly gentlemen who risked their all and saw their colleagues die can see the freedom they fought for is being thrown away by the "Trojan Horse" of massive immigration which is invasion by another name.
Although at opposite poles of the political spectrum Winston Churchill and Keir Hardie were both patriots unlike the commedians and traitors of their former parties.
That is why the two great men would have supported our party and the pilots do.
THEY ARE , AND WE ARE PATRIOTS, AND ALWAYS PUT THE
BRITISH PEOPLE FIRST!
Wednesday, 25 March 2009
RAPID PROGRESS
I have never been busier in 5 years as Wigan organiser. Enquiries are coming in at a rapid rate and accelerating. People are very receptive to our clear message having seen the effects of the disastrous globalising of economies and the fact that when one big one fails others fall in a domino effect.
The old jibes of the other parties and far left against us are daily shown to be without substance.
Their portrayal of us as thugs was shown by the hammer attack on one of our members to be untrue and indeed showed them to be thugs.
The hammer attack is commented upon all over the country in letters to papers as evidence of the undemocratic agenda of our enemies who refuse to debate with us in a civil manner but are prepared th engage in violence against us on the pavement.
The police actions with phone tapping and landlord harassment showed that the State has an anti democratic ie Fascist agenda in true "Common Purpose" fashion. This latter publicly funded organisation states openly that it is preparing for "The Post Democratic" state.
Not much democracy there then.
That is why the other parties have joined to stop our progress. They've all got their snouts in the trough and want to keep them there. That's why they are pro the unaccountable EU.
The other Friday we tempted them out of their holes and they gave themselves away to the disgust of many people.
They really have shot themselves in the foot as my extra work demonstrates.
Locally ex Councillor Franzen has also shown his tenuous grasp on reality as seen in the letters to the local paper grabbed by Morgan below. He said he had photographic evidence of the attacks on him but has thus far failed to produce it.
How can he? He was not attacked and he knows it.
In another exchange in the Evening Post he shows himself to be paranoid as well. He says MI5 and Mossad are watching him .
Does he really think he is that important or wields such clout?
Or is it delusions of grandeur?
He says he was "held by the throat" by a BNP member but could not retaliate as the police would have arrested him. B****CKS.
He says all this persecution has caused his marriage to break up.
Sorry about that ex Councillor I wouldn't wish that on anybody, but could it not be that you are a thoroughly unpleasant man and a liar at that?
Sorry ex Councillor your star is fading and ours is getting ever brighter!
The old jibes of the other parties and far left against us are daily shown to be without substance.
Their portrayal of us as thugs was shown by the hammer attack on one of our members to be untrue and indeed showed them to be thugs.
The hammer attack is commented upon all over the country in letters to papers as evidence of the undemocratic agenda of our enemies who refuse to debate with us in a civil manner but are prepared th engage in violence against us on the pavement.
The police actions with phone tapping and landlord harassment showed that the State has an anti democratic ie Fascist agenda in true "Common Purpose" fashion. This latter publicly funded organisation states openly that it is preparing for "The Post Democratic" state.
Not much democracy there then.
That is why the other parties have joined to stop our progress. They've all got their snouts in the trough and want to keep them there. That's why they are pro the unaccountable EU.
The other Friday we tempted them out of their holes and they gave themselves away to the disgust of many people.
They really have shot themselves in the foot as my extra work demonstrates.
Locally ex Councillor Franzen has also shown his tenuous grasp on reality as seen in the letters to the local paper grabbed by Morgan below. He said he had photographic evidence of the attacks on him but has thus far failed to produce it.
How can he? He was not attacked and he knows it.
In another exchange in the Evening Post he shows himself to be paranoid as well. He says MI5 and Mossad are watching him .
Does he really think he is that important or wields such clout?
Or is it delusions of grandeur?
He says he was "held by the throat" by a BNP member but could not retaliate as the police would have arrested him. B****CKS.
He says all this persecution has caused his marriage to break up.
Sorry about that ex Councillor I wouldn't wish that on anybody, but could it not be that you are a thoroughly unpleasant man and a liar at that?
Sorry ex Councillor your star is fading and ours is getting ever brighter!
Tuesday, 24 March 2009
THE FIGHT BACK BEGINS
This is a letter I sent to the Police Complaints Commission re our persecution in Leigh by the police.
I have done it to show we will not take lying down this phone tapping and preventing us having our private functions.
I have done it to show we will not take lying down this phone tapping and preventing us having our private functions.
Thursday, 19 March 2009
THE CONVERSATION THEY DIDN'T WANT YOU TO READ
Due to my lack of technical knowledge I was unable to post this article on the blog. The screengrabs were the problem. It was a case of … I can’t, but I know a man who can. A big thank you to Phil Bryant from London. He can be found here:
http://bfbwwiii.blogspot.com/
We BNPers may not forget sleights – but we don’t forget favours either. Thank you Phil. If you ever need the favour returning, don’t be backward about coming forward. Phil is not a party member.
A little perseverance will be required from the readers of this post. It is necessarily a very long post in order to fully demonstrate the duplicity of the opponents of the BNP. There is, as you might expect, a starring role for Peter Franzen, founder and leader of the Community Action Party; taking the co-starring role is the Wigan Evening Post/Observer/ Reporter, who all combine on the net to become ‘Wigan Today’. Lengthy as this post is, I believe that once you start reading it your interest will be grabbed to such an extent you will read it right through. I’m not one of those people who is so contemptuous of the intellectual capacity of the average Briton as to think that all you’re capable of taking in is a soundbite. I leave that sort of thing to Lord Voldemort (Mandelson) and his spinmeister cronies in his and other political parties. Contrary to the story put out by our opponents, we in the BNP are not thick knuckledraggers, and nor do we think most of you are, despite the way education has been wrecked over the past thirty years (no, it didn’t start with Labour; all they did was accelerate the decline).
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews
It is the role of Wigan Today that we find particularly sinister. All we in the BNP ask of the media is that they be neutral and impartial, and report only the truth, whether it be good for us, or bad for us – nothing more, but certainly nothing less. These they appear unable and/or unwilling to be. Even the BBC, famously not exactly enamoured of the BNP, has been more honest about events last Friday evening in Leigh (the infamous “Hammer Attack”) than has our local paper.
This post contains many ‘screengrabs’. These are, in effect, photographs of pages from the web, and they render events like Wigan News’ attempt at a Stalinesque airbrush from history, of the comment conversation on one of their threads over the weekend, an exercise in futility in the computer and internet age.
I personally believe ( that is, it is my opinion only and it’s possible I’m wrong – but make your own minds up. I am incidentally, a qualified but non-practising psychologist in the field of Cognitive Science) this was done to hide the fact that Peter Franzen made an utter fool of himself while his mind disintegrated in public. My own brother has a copy of my entire screengrab file; he is a practising highly experienced psychiatrist (that, in effect, is a psychologist who is also a medical doctor) – and he tells me he has genuine concerns about Franzen, and feels Franzen “demonstrated the hallmarks of someone slightly dissociated which could happen to one who is panicking somewhat”. Would Wigan Today take the same care to protect, say, the Wigan BNP organiser, or me the fund-holder and election agent, the only two BNP officers in Wigan, from the same embarrassment and public humiliation? Somehow we doubt this. Indeed, we believe they would pounce on it as an opportunity to discredit us and the BNP. And panicking? Oh yes, but it’s not just Franzen – it’s the entire political establishment and social elite. They know full well that we intend to take away from them their entire train set – their gravy train set. In private conversations even Labour MPs fear the possibility that the BNP may take five or six seats in the upcoming Euro-elections. Internal to the party we have been told not to raise our expectations and to be grateful to the voting public if we even take one. That is to preserve our morale. There is nothing worse for morale than raising it up and then dropping it again. However, I speak to the general public, the proverbial man in the street. I also read blogs and the comments in places such as the Telegraph and the Guardian. Oh boy – no wonder the elite is panicking. Five or six seats as Labour MPs fear? Not a chance. I personally predict at least eight. A vote for the BNP is no longer a wasted vote.
Anyhow, read the story of events and make your own minds up whether you want to bother buying the Wigan local papers in future. They obviously can’t be trusted to be truthful. And as for Peter Franzen – after his performance over the weekend he would be wise to retire completely from politics, if only to save himself from further humiliation and embarrassment. From the things he said he obviously thinks the people of Wigan are stupid and gullible … but does he think the BNP has no memory and wont remind Wigan people of Franzen’s opinion of them, in detail, on every necessary occasion?
The whole sequence of events started on Thursday when this appeared on the web:
http://www.labournet.net/antiracism/0903/bnp1.html
(Screengrabbed and stashed in various safe places – deletion will protect no one)
As you can see, Peter Franzen was involved from the very beginning. Indeed, it could quite easily be said that he initiated the whole sequence of events that led to the hammer attack – an attack that we in the BNP consider to be a premeditated attempt to murder a BNP member going about his lawful business. After all, it’s not often you find a claw hammer lying around in the street just about the time you spontaneously decide to hammer someone. The perp had the hammer in advance. So he had the idea in advance – premeditation. Premeditation, plus hammer blows (two off) to the head - attempted murder. Who are the knuckledraggers again?
Next day, the Friday of the attack, Wigan Today posted the following story:
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/BNP-meeting-cancelled.5069761.jp
(again: screengrabbed and stashed - and distributed)
This generated something over 75 comments during that day and night. However, as regular readers of Wigan Today know, we have a phantom deleter amongst us, and today
he was on the prowl. Almost all of that first batch of comments was deleted (censored), by, one can only assume, the phantom deleter. Certainly no one believes it to have been the Wigan Today editorial staff. These were all comments made before the hammer attack, or at least before news of the attack was widely known. However, very late in the evening after I got home from the roadshow, I needed to say something about events, and having nowhere else to say it, I said it in the comments to this Wigan Today article. Here it is [comment 80].
This is the conversation in Wigan Today that the editorial team did not want you read. There was no profanity, no threats. But they did not want you to read it. Read it here and you will see why. Peter Franzen made an utter fool of himself.
And to repeat my comment No 80 (above) in easily readable form:
Difficult to recognise, from that, the standard leftard view that we are white supremacist racists and would make mixed race marriages illegal. White BNP member victim with Chinese wife; and black, claw hammer wielding, attacker
That was it for the comments on the Friday night and early hours of Saturday morning.
The following day, the Saturday immediately following the Friday hammer attack, Wigan Today ran a story on it – or at least what passes for a story:
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/Hammer-attack-on-man-in.5072880.jp
I’m not sure that this version of events really ought to be dignified by description as a story, but language fails me here, so story I will have to call it. It carries no sense whatsoever of the course of events – who started it, how many attackers, how many attacked … and leaves one with a vague feeling that it was some sort of straightforward street brawl between two evenly matched gangs. Nothing, as we all now know, could be further from the truth.
A mere four unarmed members of the BNP were attacked by some thirty-plus leftard supporters of the SWP/UAF/CAP/Respect Party, armed with hammers at the minimum. Why did the police arrest only one man? There is no sense of any of this in that Wigan Today story.
And a wound to the head inflicted with a claw hammer not a serious injury? No picture of course – sounds like he just had a bump on the head. And no mention of course, that the man who carried it out was not native British. So: not native British and described by others as black, attacking a native British – white – member of the BNP, with a hammer, and yet no one has seen fit to call this what it really is: a racially aggravated attempted murder?
Then there are the claims about the reasons the venue cancelled the event – which was much more than a mere meeting. We in the BNP dispute those claims, and Dr. Mather has blogged on these matters in a couple of earlier posts, so I will not go into that here, although it is a topic we will repeatedly visit in the future. The police are intimately involved.
There was, of course, no comment facility allowed for this story. We wonder why not?
Here is the BBC version of that same story, published on that same day. Obviously the BBC made the effort to send a reporter to Leigh to dig out a few facts and independent witness accounts. And credit to the BBC (and by God you have no idea how much it pains me to say that), they published as they found. The story sounds as if it is of an entirely different event:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/7943556.stm
Take special note of the following :
“Violence broke out as 30 people surrounded a BNP vehicle outside the Ellesmere Pub in St Helens Road in Leigh on Friday evening, said police.”
[ … ]
“One witness told BBC News: "They had hammers and they smacked the vehicle to pieces, smashed all the windows and tore off the bumper, completely decimated it.
"I was shocked at what I saw." “
Note use of the plural in reference to the hammers. So why only one arrest? I’m sure if I or any other BNP member were in a fracas of an evening, and were in possession of hammers or anything else that could be used as a weapon, we would all be arrested. We all know that.
So about thirty people with hammers assaulted a vehicle with four BNP members in it.
No hint of that on our local newspaper (NEWSpaper??), Wigan Today.
It is noted on various BBC-monitoring websites that the BBC is in the habit of altering stories and occasionally making them disappear if they turn out to be politically inconvenient.
Accordingly, I have this screengrabbed, stashed, and distributed too – along with all the Wigan Today stories.
Now then – this hammer attack in our borough needed discussing. However, with no comment facility permitted for the attack story on the Saturday, we gravitated to the previous story about the meeting being cancelled at Leigh (relevant links and screengrabs above).
Then came a massive – by Wigan Today standards – commenting session stretching across Saturday and Sunday and up into Sunday evening, of over 200 comments. Apart from two comments, none of these were deleted at the time – either the phantom deleter was away for the weekend, or he was as fascinated by the conversation as anyone else living locally (it wouldn’t have mattered anyway – I was screengrabbing almost comment by comment as they went up, and only missed one). Peter Franzen played a prominent, and unintentionally hilarious, part in this conversation. As he is despised by almost every other politician in Wigan from MPs to councillors and activists – including some, it must be said, from his own party - the Community Action Party – I can only assume half of Wigan echoed to the sounds of guffawing at his foolishness. The following screengrabs are extracts from the weekend conversation. Follow closely and watch the public mental disintegration of one Mr Peter Franzen as he had a couple of new holes ripped into his backside. He doesn’t have the sense God gave to the humble housebrick, and he absolutely does not have even enough of a sense of humour to recognise when he is being laughed at. Assuming he has one at all.
These are only extracts – I have all the in-between comments grabbed too. For this post – to keep it as small and neat as possible, I’ve formatted all the original comments used. My Screengrabs file contains the whole pages, as in that first screengrab posted above.
Comment 101 Franzen’s first comment:
It seems Peter hadn’t read the BBC story then. Very careless of him. And note – from his claims he seems to have been present from before the violence started, having apparently, so he claims, seen its very beginnings. This is an important reference point for later on in this account, as part of proving that not only he, but also Wigan Today are liars.
Franzen lies directly, and so simplistically that his lies could be detected by a child. However, Wigan Today lies indirectly by omission and misdirection. This, it should be noted good people, is far more dangerous to our well-being.
Here, with comment 110 is where I first entered the conversation:
This next is comment 111 by Franzen (again carelessness by me – clipping off the top). Do note an early attempt to distance himself from any repercussions. Not entirely stupid then, despite the awful transparency of this lie given that it was he who kicked the whole thing off (see first link near top of article, and the utterly fantastic version of events in comment 101) – he just think everyone else is. He must do because the lying just gets ever more fantastical as the comments progress. Consider his reckoning of being attacked with the BBC version of events. He’s in trouble and he knows it. But he obviously never listened to Healey’s dictum that when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. Oh no, not Franzen: he’s just hired a JCB. That he can think anyone could possibly believe any of this demonstrates an astounding arrogance. Man of the people Peter Franzen. And do notice the confession of cowardice: incites others to illegal action, but himself claims to have stayed out of it.
He was there before the violence started because he claims to have witnessed ‘BNP Nazi stormtroopers armed with hammers’ etc attacking a peaceful demonstration; then he didn’t arrive until after the violence had started. So which was it Peter? Surely your body can’t be as schizophrenic as your mind apparently is? Both there and not there at the same time? Schrodinger’s cat before the box is opened perhaps? Please, do explain.
Could it be Peter, that you just have a grudge against the BNP because our candidate in Golborne last year took more votes than you lost your seat to Labour by?
In comment 117 Peter Franzen is either showing the first signs of mental unravelling, or he is unable to stop the full extent of his arrogance towards, and contempt for, we mere ordinary people from coming to the fore. I am a BNP party officer, but he shows far more signs of the brutality of Nazism than anyone has ever seen coming from me, or from Dr. Mather, the other and more senior BNP party officer in Wigan. And he still can’t drop the lying.
And now Mr. Franzen is seriously losing it. He’s making very un-Franzen-like typos. Normally so careful. And what’s that dictum about holes and digging? He’s certainly getting his money’s worth out of that JCB. Only someone seriously rattled is going to bring – and do I read this right? – German Shepherd dogs into the accusation. And earlier it was SOME women and children – now apparently MOST of them were women and children. And he’s trying to change the direction of the conversation with talk of the Government. No Peter, this is about you and your lies. Hahahahah – German Shepherd dogs. Being attacked by those creatures is not something that would just slip your mind in your earlier accusations. Oh, and while we’re here – you said dogs, plural. How many were there Peter – must have been at least two eh? Or was it three, maybe four? More? A whole pack of them? Were they driving a Tiger tank by any chance? That was German too. Hah – that’s a good one Peter – German Shepherd dogs. You’re in the wrong business: maybe you ought to switch to writing fantasy fiction with an imagination like that.
Franzen’s mind disintegrating in public. How awfully embarrassing for his family.
Here’s what I said on the night – I was just struck too dumb in awe at his antics to say any more than this:
And Carter Ruck isn’t a particularly good bet these days Peter – hasn’t been the same since the ol’ man shuffled off this mortal coil a few years back. He was a Peter too. When are you popping down to London to see them? That alone will set you back a grand, and there’s no legal aid for Libel. We have our own lawyers now in the BNP – didn’t you know that? How does the CAP stand for in-house lawyers these days? Just asking like …
More typos – definitely rattled. Not quite the walkover you were expecting was it Peter? Not used to it are you. Word out of your party is that you wont tolerate anything but total submission to your word, otherwise you go off into a sulk
Ah yes TheJones – thus far. The editorial permissiveness was only because this conversation took place at the weekend when there was no editorial team present. You don’t think for one minute do you that sush superior people work at weekends? And as for the fracture: yes, it is making a creeping progress, and the Wigan Today team, by their actions on return to work Monday morning made quite clear which side of the fracture they have chosen.
That comment was the final comment of the conversation. Then the editorial team removed it. SO THAT IS THE CONVERSATION THEY DIDN’T WANT YOU – ANYONE - TO READ! Now comes the question: WHY didn’t they want you to read it? To be perfectly honest, as I’m not literally a mind-reader, I couldn’t tell you. You’ll have to make your own minds up about it. I can give no more than a few suggestions about my suspicions on the matter. First, the BNP came out well. The BNP was not shown to be Nazis/Fascists/racists/thugs etc. Regarding the usual ‘racist’ accusations – the most seriously injured BNP activist turns out to have a Chinese wife; one of the two BNP officers in Wigan turns out to have been married 24 years to an Asian woman, and has a mixed race child (well, she’s 20 now). The racist accusation isn’t looking too healthy is it – and the BNP as a party fully understands that affairs of the heart can’t be legislated against. Young men and young women fall in love with each other – how can that be legislated against? Do you claim we are racists or something? Do you dislike being shown to be lying? The BNP’s opposition showed themselves to be violent thugs. Their chief defender here, Peter Franzen, turns out to be at the very least a fantasist, at the worst a liar. Need I go on? A man who never took his psychological warfare studies past the Goebbels age, without realizing that in the present day even poorly educated Britons are now sophisticated enough to detect out and out lies of the Goebbels kind. And they have computers and internet connections.
The editorial team didn’t just censor the conversation, they removed all trace of the fact that it ever existed. That is how Stalin used to do things. He didn’t just airbrush people out of photographs – he had all trace of the fact that they had ever existed removed from official records and deleted from the past media. This is also how ‘Big Brother’ in George Orwell’s 1984 worked. Today at peace with EastAsia. An overnight change of alliances and next day we are at war with EastAsia, we have always been at war with EastAsia – and all records to the contrary expunged. That is what Wigan Today did to this conversation. They must have scored a First on Stalin studies. And for this to happen in the town Orwell is famous for his connection with, a town that is proud of that connection …
Unfortunately for them this sort of thing just doesn’t cut it in the age of the internet. There will be several people who took screengrabs of that entire conversation – just like I did. There is also, of course, the fact that the conversation, even if expunged from public viewing, is still present on the hard drives in the newspaper offices, and also on the servers. Then there is Google-Cache. Mr editor sir, have you heard of Google-Cache? Do you know what it does and how it works? I suggest you give yourself a rapid learning experience. And then there are the weblogs. People who ARE awarwe of events can report on them online; can produce the evidence that the media thinks it has expunged from the public record. We, and people like us are going to win Mr Editor. I suggest you have a rapid reappraisal of your choice of sides in the developing fracture. We in the BNP don’t expect you to take our side – we just expect you to report the truth and report it impartially. Nothing more, BUT CERTAINLY NOTHING LESS!
Who is the serious problem here – Peter Franzen and his thugs, or the media? I would say the media. Franzen and his thugs are trivial and can be handled. The media, however is a different matter. If the media doesn’t tell you then it becomes a non-story – it didn’t happen. If they don’t report on problems then those problems don’t exist. Or at least – they don’t exist in the minds of that vast majority of the public that weren’t personally involved. So, not knowing all the facts, how can people be expected to vote rationally? But that’s the whole point isn’t it Mr Editor, Mr Labour Party, you don’t want people to be in possession of all the facts so that they can arrive at a rational decision on how to cast their vote; you want them to just vote Labour out of tribal loyalty to the Labour Party as it used to be – the Labour Party I used to vote for, that I used to be a member of, that I used to be an activist for. You want the “my father always voted Labour so …” rule to last forever. Well my father always voted Labour but now I’m an activist with the BNP. Are you now going to claim that the day I resigned from the Labour Party in 1999 I suddenly became a Nazi/thug/Fascist/racist/knuckledragger etc? I resigned from the Labour party because it finally penetrated my stubborn – and you don’t know stubborn until you know either my father or me – mind that this is no longer the Labour Party. A group of entryists have penetrated it and taken it over, very cleverly retaining use of the name that so many people are tribally loyal to. Those same entryists have done the same to what once the respectable and respected (even if disliked and disagreed with) Conservative Party. The Liberal Democratic Party has always been away somewhere on a planet of their own.
With reference to my screengrabs: on Monday morning when Wigan Today expunged all trace of that conversation having ever taken place, I had a minor episode of paranoia. I had stated quite clearly that I had the entire conversation grabbed, and, the police being in on this conspiracy to do down the BNP, I half expected a visit to confiscate my computer and remove the evidence (possibly planting evidence of paedophile pictures in its place, as seems to happen to so many people these days? I even find myself feeling a little sympathy for Joe Shaw, and can’t get rid of that little niggling voice in the back of my head that says “I wonder?”. There is none, of course, but once you have your hands on someone’s computer, well …) Anyway, I distributed my entire collection of screen grabs off to various internet acquaintances nationwide, and also a copy to each of two people in Australia and Canada, with requests to further distribute nationally (to them) and internationally. The evidence is now available outside the jurisdiction of the British political/media/police etc. My copy has become irrelevant – take it and it can be acquired from elsewhere. Like I said, or at least implied, earlier – we are living in the computer and internet age – old methods of political promotion and suppression no longer work. The BNP has learned this lesson well.
Anyway, is that the end of the story regarding the Leigh incident and news and comment about it? Well, no, as it happens.
I informed earlier of, and provided a link to, the Wigan Today report of the Leigh incident, as published on Saturday morning. The expunged conversation, of course, entirely trashed that story. What did Wigan Today do? First of all, on Monday morning they expunged the conversation from the public record (they thought), and then they published this, Version 2 of the Leigh incident:
They even included a picture of Tony Ward which would indicate that their claim he was only trivially injured was either a lie, or they are taking their story from the word of someone who was an interested party. Peter Franzen perhaps? Well what do you know – there it is in Version 2 – quotes from one Mr Peter Franzen, the very man who had been shown up to be at best a fantasist, at worst an out and out liar, in the conversation that has now been conveniently expunged (they think) from the public record. Either the Wigan Today editorial team is stupid and gullible, or they think the people of Wigan are stupid and gullible. Well I for one do not think the editorial team is stupid and gullible (well, they may be gullible, but they’re not stupid), so I have to ask the people of Wigan: are you going to keep giving your money to these people by buying their products now that you’ve found out what they think of you? Just asking.
So we have a newspaper that has learned the truth about Franzen, but all it does is remove the evidence of that truth and then quotes … Franzen. Wigan Today had an unforced choice: it could be on the side of reporting the truth – which is what is expected of the media, or it could be on the side of reporting the lie. It chose the lie. Can its impartiality be ever again trusted? I have been told – though I haven’t seen it myself – that Franzen repeated his unbelievable allegations regarding stormtroopers, hammers and German Shepherd dogs in the Wigan Evening Post letters. Why is Franzen permitted to repeat his lies while the BNP is refused permission to tell the truth? They even refuse to run paid-for adverts from us.
Franzen and his boot (hammer) boys is not the problem. The media is the problem. It’s not just the BNP’s problem – it’s the problem of the entire population of Wigan and the rest of Britain. It deliberately keeps you ignorant of the facts.
We will be publishing more about this co-ordinated campaign against the BNP in coming weeks. We have reported the bare bones – just the bare bones – of the police’s part in it; now a small piece (despite the length of this article, it’s still only a small piece) of the media’s part in it. The established church in Manchester has recently announced its part in it. The established political parties have announced their part in it (“Vote for anyone but the BNP”. D. Cameron), as has the police and media. More? Do let us know. These people would be surprised at the places where we have sympathizers who provide us with information.
It appears the powers that be, in their desperate panic, have decided to implement Robert Scumbage’s Zimbabwe method of political campaigning. Use force and severe violence to intimidate the opposition; use the police to make it difficult for the opposition to operate a campaign; and use the media to suppress the truth and generally misinform the public. And rumours abound that there are plans afoot to use the British Army on the streets of Britain. All straight out of President Scumbage’s book of politics. If you the voting public let them get away with this, then you and this country are facing a very sad future as the European Zimbabwe. They are also introducing the beginnings of Scumbage’s idea of an acceptable inflation rate by the use of “Quantitative Easing” – just a Euphemism for printing vast amounts of fiat money. Is anyone comfortable with all this? Are you ready for the £1,000,000 note? And do you have the wheelbarrow you’ll need to carry enough of them to buy a loaf of bread?
Beat them and their methods: Vote BNP.
Morg
http://bfbwwiii.blogspot.com/
We BNPers may not forget sleights – but we don’t forget favours either. Thank you Phil. If you ever need the favour returning, don’t be backward about coming forward. Phil is not a party member.
A little perseverance will be required from the readers of this post. It is necessarily a very long post in order to fully demonstrate the duplicity of the opponents of the BNP. There is, as you might expect, a starring role for Peter Franzen, founder and leader of the Community Action Party; taking the co-starring role is the Wigan Evening Post/Observer/ Reporter, who all combine on the net to become ‘Wigan Today’. Lengthy as this post is, I believe that once you start reading it your interest will be grabbed to such an extent you will read it right through. I’m not one of those people who is so contemptuous of the intellectual capacity of the average Briton as to think that all you’re capable of taking in is a soundbite. I leave that sort of thing to Lord Voldemort (Mandelson) and his spinmeister cronies in his and other political parties. Contrary to the story put out by our opponents, we in the BNP are not thick knuckledraggers, and nor do we think most of you are, despite the way education has been wrecked over the past thirty years (no, it didn’t start with Labour; all they did was accelerate the decline).
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews
It is the role of Wigan Today that we find particularly sinister. All we in the BNP ask of the media is that they be neutral and impartial, and report only the truth, whether it be good for us, or bad for us – nothing more, but certainly nothing less. These they appear unable and/or unwilling to be. Even the BBC, famously not exactly enamoured of the BNP, has been more honest about events last Friday evening in Leigh (the infamous “Hammer Attack”) than has our local paper.
This post contains many ‘screengrabs’. These are, in effect, photographs of pages from the web, and they render events like Wigan News’ attempt at a Stalinesque airbrush from history, of the comment conversation on one of their threads over the weekend, an exercise in futility in the computer and internet age.
I personally believe ( that is, it is my opinion only and it’s possible I’m wrong – but make your own minds up. I am incidentally, a qualified but non-practising psychologist in the field of Cognitive Science) this was done to hide the fact that Peter Franzen made an utter fool of himself while his mind disintegrated in public. My own brother has a copy of my entire screengrab file; he is a practising highly experienced psychiatrist (that, in effect, is a psychologist who is also a medical doctor) – and he tells me he has genuine concerns about Franzen, and feels Franzen “demonstrated the hallmarks of someone slightly dissociated which could happen to one who is panicking somewhat”. Would Wigan Today take the same care to protect, say, the Wigan BNP organiser, or me the fund-holder and election agent, the only two BNP officers in Wigan, from the same embarrassment and public humiliation? Somehow we doubt this. Indeed, we believe they would pounce on it as an opportunity to discredit us and the BNP. And panicking? Oh yes, but it’s not just Franzen – it’s the entire political establishment and social elite. They know full well that we intend to take away from them their entire train set – their gravy train set. In private conversations even Labour MPs fear the possibility that the BNP may take five or six seats in the upcoming Euro-elections. Internal to the party we have been told not to raise our expectations and to be grateful to the voting public if we even take one. That is to preserve our morale. There is nothing worse for morale than raising it up and then dropping it again. However, I speak to the general public, the proverbial man in the street. I also read blogs and the comments in places such as the Telegraph and the Guardian. Oh boy – no wonder the elite is panicking. Five or six seats as Labour MPs fear? Not a chance. I personally predict at least eight. A vote for the BNP is no longer a wasted vote.
Anyhow, read the story of events and make your own minds up whether you want to bother buying the Wigan local papers in future. They obviously can’t be trusted to be truthful. And as for Peter Franzen – after his performance over the weekend he would be wise to retire completely from politics, if only to save himself from further humiliation and embarrassment. From the things he said he obviously thinks the people of Wigan are stupid and gullible … but does he think the BNP has no memory and wont remind Wigan people of Franzen’s opinion of them, in detail, on every necessary occasion?
The whole sequence of events started on Thursday when this appeared on the web:
http://www.labournet.net/antiracism/0903/bnp1.html
(Screengrabbed and stashed in various safe places – deletion will protect no one)
As you can see, Peter Franzen was involved from the very beginning. Indeed, it could quite easily be said that he initiated the whole sequence of events that led to the hammer attack – an attack that we in the BNP consider to be a premeditated attempt to murder a BNP member going about his lawful business. After all, it’s not often you find a claw hammer lying around in the street just about the time you spontaneously decide to hammer someone. The perp had the hammer in advance. So he had the idea in advance – premeditation. Premeditation, plus hammer blows (two off) to the head - attempted murder. Who are the knuckledraggers again?
Next day, the Friday of the attack, Wigan Today posted the following story:
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/BNP-meeting-cancelled.5069761.jp
(again: screengrabbed and stashed - and distributed)
This generated something over 75 comments during that day and night. However, as regular readers of Wigan Today know, we have a phantom deleter amongst us, and today
he was on the prowl. Almost all of that first batch of comments was deleted (censored), by, one can only assume, the phantom deleter. Certainly no one believes it to have been the Wigan Today editorial staff. These were all comments made before the hammer attack, or at least before news of the attack was widely known. However, very late in the evening after I got home from the roadshow, I needed to say something about events, and having nowhere else to say it, I said it in the comments to this Wigan Today article. Here it is [comment 80].
This is the conversation in Wigan Today that the editorial team did not want you read. There was no profanity, no threats. But they did not want you to read it. Read it here and you will see why. Peter Franzen made an utter fool of himself.
And to repeat my comment No 80 (above) in easily readable form:
Difficult to recognise, from that, the standard leftard view that we are white supremacist racists and would make mixed race marriages illegal. White BNP member victim with Chinese wife; and black, claw hammer wielding, attacker
That was it for the comments on the Friday night and early hours of Saturday morning.
The following day, the Saturday immediately following the Friday hammer attack, Wigan Today ran a story on it – or at least what passes for a story:
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/Hammer-attack-on-man-in.5072880.jp
I’m not sure that this version of events really ought to be dignified by description as a story, but language fails me here, so story I will have to call it. It carries no sense whatsoever of the course of events – who started it, how many attackers, how many attacked … and leaves one with a vague feeling that it was some sort of straightforward street brawl between two evenly matched gangs. Nothing, as we all now know, could be further from the truth.
A mere four unarmed members of the BNP were attacked by some thirty-plus leftard supporters of the SWP/UAF/CAP/Respect Party, armed with hammers at the minimum. Why did the police arrest only one man? There is no sense of any of this in that Wigan Today story.
And a wound to the head inflicted with a claw hammer not a serious injury? No picture of course – sounds like he just had a bump on the head. And no mention of course, that the man who carried it out was not native British. So: not native British and described by others as black, attacking a native British – white – member of the BNP, with a hammer, and yet no one has seen fit to call this what it really is: a racially aggravated attempted murder?
Then there are the claims about the reasons the venue cancelled the event – which was much more than a mere meeting. We in the BNP dispute those claims, and Dr. Mather has blogged on these matters in a couple of earlier posts, so I will not go into that here, although it is a topic we will repeatedly visit in the future. The police are intimately involved.
There was, of course, no comment facility allowed for this story. We wonder why not?
Here is the BBC version of that same story, published on that same day. Obviously the BBC made the effort to send a reporter to Leigh to dig out a few facts and independent witness accounts. And credit to the BBC (and by God you have no idea how much it pains me to say that), they published as they found. The story sounds as if it is of an entirely different event:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/7943556.stm
Take special note of the following :
“Violence broke out as 30 people surrounded a BNP vehicle outside the Ellesmere Pub in St Helens Road in Leigh on Friday evening, said police.”
[ … ]
“One witness told BBC News: "They had hammers and they smacked the vehicle to pieces, smashed all the windows and tore off the bumper, completely decimated it.
"I was shocked at what I saw." “
Note use of the plural in reference to the hammers. So why only one arrest? I’m sure if I or any other BNP member were in a fracas of an evening, and were in possession of hammers or anything else that could be used as a weapon, we would all be arrested. We all know that.
So about thirty people with hammers assaulted a vehicle with four BNP members in it.
No hint of that on our local newspaper (NEWSpaper??), Wigan Today.
It is noted on various BBC-monitoring websites that the BBC is in the habit of altering stories and occasionally making them disappear if they turn out to be politically inconvenient.
Accordingly, I have this screengrabbed, stashed, and distributed too – along with all the Wigan Today stories.
Now then – this hammer attack in our borough needed discussing. However, with no comment facility permitted for the attack story on the Saturday, we gravitated to the previous story about the meeting being cancelled at Leigh (relevant links and screengrabs above).
Then came a massive – by Wigan Today standards – commenting session stretching across Saturday and Sunday and up into Sunday evening, of over 200 comments. Apart from two comments, none of these were deleted at the time – either the phantom deleter was away for the weekend, or he was as fascinated by the conversation as anyone else living locally (it wouldn’t have mattered anyway – I was screengrabbing almost comment by comment as they went up, and only missed one). Peter Franzen played a prominent, and unintentionally hilarious, part in this conversation. As he is despised by almost every other politician in Wigan from MPs to councillors and activists – including some, it must be said, from his own party - the Community Action Party – I can only assume half of Wigan echoed to the sounds of guffawing at his foolishness. The following screengrabs are extracts from the weekend conversation. Follow closely and watch the public mental disintegration of one Mr Peter Franzen as he had a couple of new holes ripped into his backside. He doesn’t have the sense God gave to the humble housebrick, and he absolutely does not have even enough of a sense of humour to recognise when he is being laughed at. Assuming he has one at all.
These are only extracts – I have all the in-between comments grabbed too. For this post – to keep it as small and neat as possible, I’ve formatted all the original comments used. My Screengrabs file contains the whole pages, as in that first screengrab posted above.
Comment 101 Franzen’s first comment:
It seems Peter hadn’t read the BBC story then. Very careless of him. And note – from his claims he seems to have been present from before the violence started, having apparently, so he claims, seen its very beginnings. This is an important reference point for later on in this account, as part of proving that not only he, but also Wigan Today are liars.
Franzen lies directly, and so simplistically that his lies could be detected by a child. However, Wigan Today lies indirectly by omission and misdirection. This, it should be noted good people, is far more dangerous to our well-being.
Here, with comment 110 is where I first entered the conversation:
This next is comment 111 by Franzen (again carelessness by me – clipping off the top). Do note an early attempt to distance himself from any repercussions. Not entirely stupid then, despite the awful transparency of this lie given that it was he who kicked the whole thing off (see first link near top of article, and the utterly fantastic version of events in comment 101) – he just think everyone else is. He must do because the lying just gets ever more fantastical as the comments progress. Consider his reckoning of being attacked with the BBC version of events. He’s in trouble and he knows it. But he obviously never listened to Healey’s dictum that when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. Oh no, not Franzen: he’s just hired a JCB. That he can think anyone could possibly believe any of this demonstrates an astounding arrogance. Man of the people Peter Franzen. And do notice the confession of cowardice: incites others to illegal action, but himself claims to have stayed out of it.
He was there before the violence started because he claims to have witnessed ‘BNP Nazi stormtroopers armed with hammers’ etc attacking a peaceful demonstration; then he didn’t arrive until after the violence had started. So which was it Peter? Surely your body can’t be as schizophrenic as your mind apparently is? Both there and not there at the same time? Schrodinger’s cat before the box is opened perhaps? Please, do explain.
Could it be Peter, that you just have a grudge against the BNP because our candidate in Golborne last year took more votes than you lost your seat to Labour by?
In comment 117 Peter Franzen is either showing the first signs of mental unravelling, or he is unable to stop the full extent of his arrogance towards, and contempt for, we mere ordinary people from coming to the fore. I am a BNP party officer, but he shows far more signs of the brutality of Nazism than anyone has ever seen coming from me, or from Dr. Mather, the other and more senior BNP party officer in Wigan. And he still can’t drop the lying.
And now Mr. Franzen is seriously losing it. He’s making very un-Franzen-like typos. Normally so careful. And what’s that dictum about holes and digging? He’s certainly getting his money’s worth out of that JCB. Only someone seriously rattled is going to bring – and do I read this right? – German Shepherd dogs into the accusation. And earlier it was SOME women and children – now apparently MOST of them were women and children. And he’s trying to change the direction of the conversation with talk of the Government. No Peter, this is about you and your lies. Hahahahah – German Shepherd dogs. Being attacked by those creatures is not something that would just slip your mind in your earlier accusations. Oh, and while we’re here – you said dogs, plural. How many were there Peter – must have been at least two eh? Or was it three, maybe four? More? A whole pack of them? Were they driving a Tiger tank by any chance? That was German too. Hah – that’s a good one Peter – German Shepherd dogs. You’re in the wrong business: maybe you ought to switch to writing fantasy fiction with an imagination like that.
Franzen’s mind disintegrating in public. How awfully embarrassing for his family.
Here’s what I said on the night – I was just struck too dumb in awe at his antics to say any more than this:
And Carter Ruck isn’t a particularly good bet these days Peter – hasn’t been the same since the ol’ man shuffled off this mortal coil a few years back. He was a Peter too. When are you popping down to London to see them? That alone will set you back a grand, and there’s no legal aid for Libel. We have our own lawyers now in the BNP – didn’t you know that? How does the CAP stand for in-house lawyers these days? Just asking like …
More typos – definitely rattled. Not quite the walkover you were expecting was it Peter? Not used to it are you. Word out of your party is that you wont tolerate anything but total submission to your word, otherwise you go off into a sulk
Ah yes TheJones – thus far. The editorial permissiveness was only because this conversation took place at the weekend when there was no editorial team present. You don’t think for one minute do you that sush superior people work at weekends? And as for the fracture: yes, it is making a creeping progress, and the Wigan Today team, by their actions on return to work Monday morning made quite clear which side of the fracture they have chosen.
That comment was the final comment of the conversation. Then the editorial team removed it. SO THAT IS THE CONVERSATION THEY DIDN’T WANT YOU – ANYONE - TO READ! Now comes the question: WHY didn’t they want you to read it? To be perfectly honest, as I’m not literally a mind-reader, I couldn’t tell you. You’ll have to make your own minds up about it. I can give no more than a few suggestions about my suspicions on the matter. First, the BNP came out well. The BNP was not shown to be Nazis/Fascists/racists/thugs etc. Regarding the usual ‘racist’ accusations – the most seriously injured BNP activist turns out to have a Chinese wife; one of the two BNP officers in Wigan turns out to have been married 24 years to an Asian woman, and has a mixed race child (well, she’s 20 now). The racist accusation isn’t looking too healthy is it – and the BNP as a party fully understands that affairs of the heart can’t be legislated against. Young men and young women fall in love with each other – how can that be legislated against? Do you claim we are racists or something? Do you dislike being shown to be lying? The BNP’s opposition showed themselves to be violent thugs. Their chief defender here, Peter Franzen, turns out to be at the very least a fantasist, at the worst a liar. Need I go on? A man who never took his psychological warfare studies past the Goebbels age, without realizing that in the present day even poorly educated Britons are now sophisticated enough to detect out and out lies of the Goebbels kind. And they have computers and internet connections.
The editorial team didn’t just censor the conversation, they removed all trace of the fact that it ever existed. That is how Stalin used to do things. He didn’t just airbrush people out of photographs – he had all trace of the fact that they had ever existed removed from official records and deleted from the past media. This is also how ‘Big Brother’ in George Orwell’s 1984 worked. Today at peace with EastAsia. An overnight change of alliances and next day we are at war with EastAsia, we have always been at war with EastAsia – and all records to the contrary expunged. That is what Wigan Today did to this conversation. They must have scored a First on Stalin studies. And for this to happen in the town Orwell is famous for his connection with, a town that is proud of that connection …
Unfortunately for them this sort of thing just doesn’t cut it in the age of the internet. There will be several people who took screengrabs of that entire conversation – just like I did. There is also, of course, the fact that the conversation, even if expunged from public viewing, is still present on the hard drives in the newspaper offices, and also on the servers. Then there is Google-Cache. Mr editor sir, have you heard of Google-Cache? Do you know what it does and how it works? I suggest you give yourself a rapid learning experience. And then there are the weblogs. People who ARE awarwe of events can report on them online; can produce the evidence that the media thinks it has expunged from the public record. We, and people like us are going to win Mr Editor. I suggest you have a rapid reappraisal of your choice of sides in the developing fracture. We in the BNP don’t expect you to take our side – we just expect you to report the truth and report it impartially. Nothing more, BUT CERTAINLY NOTHING LESS!
Who is the serious problem here – Peter Franzen and his thugs, or the media? I would say the media. Franzen and his thugs are trivial and can be handled. The media, however is a different matter. If the media doesn’t tell you then it becomes a non-story – it didn’t happen. If they don’t report on problems then those problems don’t exist. Or at least – they don’t exist in the minds of that vast majority of the public that weren’t personally involved. So, not knowing all the facts, how can people be expected to vote rationally? But that’s the whole point isn’t it Mr Editor, Mr Labour Party, you don’t want people to be in possession of all the facts so that they can arrive at a rational decision on how to cast their vote; you want them to just vote Labour out of tribal loyalty to the Labour Party as it used to be – the Labour Party I used to vote for, that I used to be a member of, that I used to be an activist for. You want the “my father always voted Labour so …” rule to last forever. Well my father always voted Labour but now I’m an activist with the BNP. Are you now going to claim that the day I resigned from the Labour Party in 1999 I suddenly became a Nazi/thug/Fascist/racist/knuckledragger etc? I resigned from the Labour party because it finally penetrated my stubborn – and you don’t know stubborn until you know either my father or me – mind that this is no longer the Labour Party. A group of entryists have penetrated it and taken it over, very cleverly retaining use of the name that so many people are tribally loyal to. Those same entryists have done the same to what once the respectable and respected (even if disliked and disagreed with) Conservative Party. The Liberal Democratic Party has always been away somewhere on a planet of their own.
With reference to my screengrabs: on Monday morning when Wigan Today expunged all trace of that conversation having ever taken place, I had a minor episode of paranoia. I had stated quite clearly that I had the entire conversation grabbed, and, the police being in on this conspiracy to do down the BNP, I half expected a visit to confiscate my computer and remove the evidence (possibly planting evidence of paedophile pictures in its place, as seems to happen to so many people these days? I even find myself feeling a little sympathy for Joe Shaw, and can’t get rid of that little niggling voice in the back of my head that says “I wonder?”. There is none, of course, but once you have your hands on someone’s computer, well …) Anyway, I distributed my entire collection of screen grabs off to various internet acquaintances nationwide, and also a copy to each of two people in Australia and Canada, with requests to further distribute nationally (to them) and internationally. The evidence is now available outside the jurisdiction of the British political/media/police etc. My copy has become irrelevant – take it and it can be acquired from elsewhere. Like I said, or at least implied, earlier – we are living in the computer and internet age – old methods of political promotion and suppression no longer work. The BNP has learned this lesson well.
Anyway, is that the end of the story regarding the Leigh incident and news and comment about it? Well, no, as it happens.
I informed earlier of, and provided a link to, the Wigan Today report of the Leigh incident, as published on Saturday morning. The expunged conversation, of course, entirely trashed that story. What did Wigan Today do? First of all, on Monday morning they expunged the conversation from the public record (they thought), and then they published this, Version 2 of the Leigh incident:
They even included a picture of Tony Ward which would indicate that their claim he was only trivially injured was either a lie, or they are taking their story from the word of someone who was an interested party. Peter Franzen perhaps? Well what do you know – there it is in Version 2 – quotes from one Mr Peter Franzen, the very man who had been shown up to be at best a fantasist, at worst an out and out liar, in the conversation that has now been conveniently expunged (they think) from the public record. Either the Wigan Today editorial team is stupid and gullible, or they think the people of Wigan are stupid and gullible. Well I for one do not think the editorial team is stupid and gullible (well, they may be gullible, but they’re not stupid), so I have to ask the people of Wigan: are you going to keep giving your money to these people by buying their products now that you’ve found out what they think of you? Just asking.
So we have a newspaper that has learned the truth about Franzen, but all it does is remove the evidence of that truth and then quotes … Franzen. Wigan Today had an unforced choice: it could be on the side of reporting the truth – which is what is expected of the media, or it could be on the side of reporting the lie. It chose the lie. Can its impartiality be ever again trusted? I have been told – though I haven’t seen it myself – that Franzen repeated his unbelievable allegations regarding stormtroopers, hammers and German Shepherd dogs in the Wigan Evening Post letters. Why is Franzen permitted to repeat his lies while the BNP is refused permission to tell the truth? They even refuse to run paid-for adverts from us.
Franzen and his boot (hammer) boys is not the problem. The media is the problem. It’s not just the BNP’s problem – it’s the problem of the entire population of Wigan and the rest of Britain. It deliberately keeps you ignorant of the facts.
We will be publishing more about this co-ordinated campaign against the BNP in coming weeks. We have reported the bare bones – just the bare bones – of the police’s part in it; now a small piece (despite the length of this article, it’s still only a small piece) of the media’s part in it. The established church in Manchester has recently announced its part in it. The established political parties have announced their part in it (“Vote for anyone but the BNP”. D. Cameron), as has the police and media. More? Do let us know. These people would be surprised at the places where we have sympathizers who provide us with information.
It appears the powers that be, in their desperate panic, have decided to implement Robert Scumbage’s Zimbabwe method of political campaigning. Use force and severe violence to intimidate the opposition; use the police to make it difficult for the opposition to operate a campaign; and use the media to suppress the truth and generally misinform the public. And rumours abound that there are plans afoot to use the British Army on the streets of Britain. All straight out of President Scumbage’s book of politics. If you the voting public let them get away with this, then you and this country are facing a very sad future as the European Zimbabwe. They are also introducing the beginnings of Scumbage’s idea of an acceptable inflation rate by the use of “Quantitative Easing” – just a Euphemism for printing vast amounts of fiat money. Is anyone comfortable with all this? Are you ready for the £1,000,000 note? And do you have the wheelbarrow you’ll need to carry enough of them to buy a loaf of bread?
Beat them and their methods: Vote BNP.
Morg
THE ISLAMIC THREAT EXPOSED
This previously suppressed speech by a "moderate" muslim MP shows the danger we are in.
The government lavishes money and "consults" "communities" to make sure they are not offended when a new terrorist outrage occurs here.
They do not want muslims to feel persecuted or offended. Have you ever noticed they never consult Hindu or Chinese communities, let alone English communities..
THEY ARE FRIGHTENED OF THE MUSLIMS!
THEY ARE APPEASERS and the muslims rightly see them as weak.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttz8-ucWhYc
The Tories are no better and try to hoover the muslim vote by promoting such nonentities as "Baroness" Warsi to the House of Lords.
What right has this young woman to "lord" it over us? Her only claim to fame is that she is a woman from an ethnic minority and muslim and thus ticks all the boxes. Admittedly she does not wear a sack over her head, possibly so that she can be portrayed as moderate.
How many English people more experienced and intelligent are there than her? Hundreds of thousands, but they don't count.
This political correctness by both major parties in a vain effort to attract the ethnic vote is a "Trojan Horse" and the quicker the British people wake up to it the better.
However it might not be totally to their advantage as Afros, Chinese and Hindus are also aware of the danger of radical islam as is shown by disputes all over the world.
No other religion or country has expressed the intention of bending the rest of the world to their way.
In this we are all together as islam is a threat to the rest of humanity as shown by the video.
The government lavishes money and "consults" "communities" to make sure they are not offended when a new terrorist outrage occurs here.
They do not want muslims to feel persecuted or offended. Have you ever noticed they never consult Hindu or Chinese communities, let alone English communities..
THEY ARE FRIGHTENED OF THE MUSLIMS!
THEY ARE APPEASERS and the muslims rightly see them as weak.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttz8-ucWhYc
The Tories are no better and try to hoover the muslim vote by promoting such nonentities as "Baroness" Warsi to the House of Lords.
What right has this young woman to "lord" it over us? Her only claim to fame is that she is a woman from an ethnic minority and muslim and thus ticks all the boxes. Admittedly she does not wear a sack over her head, possibly so that she can be portrayed as moderate.
How many English people more experienced and intelligent are there than her? Hundreds of thousands, but they don't count.
This political correctness by both major parties in a vain effort to attract the ethnic vote is a "Trojan Horse" and the quicker the British people wake up to it the better.
However it might not be totally to their advantage as Afros, Chinese and Hindus are also aware of the danger of radical islam as is shown by disputes all over the world.
No other religion or country has expressed the intention of bending the rest of the world to their way.
In this we are all together as islam is a threat to the rest of humanity as shown by the video.
MY REACTION TO THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND
This is a letter I sent to the Liverpool diocese last week in view of the prohibition of members of the clergy from being BNP members.
The attack on us today proves to me I did the right thing.
Dear Sir,
I object to your banning of the clergy being members of the BNP, a perfectly legitimate party.
My family have been associated with the Church of England for hundreds of years, indeed a direct ancestor signed the original contract for the building of Billinge Church.
I was brought up to love the Church and all it stood for. I love the building and the sense of continuity it embodies.
Previously the Church stood up for Christianity, rather than water down its principles and in some cases abandon them to accommodate Islam, a faith bent on destroying Christianity and taking over our country. I was taught at the local C of E school about the aggressive nature of Islam and events of recent years have done nothing to disabuse me of that opinion.
I feel it is the church's job to stand firm and protect our society. Yes ,I know the parable of "The good Samaritan" but that does not advocate allowing one's enemies taking over and destroying one's faith and country.
I know of many active and passive members of the church who feel the same way. Perhaps that is why church attendees are diminishing.
I have always contributed to Billinge Church and am no raving "nazi", but I love my country, its traditions and Christian culture with which I was brought up and whose destruction I did not sanction.
That is why I am in the BNP, the only group standing up for Christian and British values. It is also why I have changed my will and bequeathed the sum, formerly allocated to the Church to the BNP.
I know I need not write this letter and it is not done in an intimidatory way but I feel I must in order to make you aware of the sadness I feel at the Church's betrayal of all I thought it stood for.
The attack on us today proves to me I did the right thing.
Dear Sir,
I object to your banning of the clergy being members of the BNP, a perfectly legitimate party.
My family have been associated with the Church of England for hundreds of years, indeed a direct ancestor signed the original contract for the building of Billinge Church.
I was brought up to love the Church and all it stood for. I love the building and the sense of continuity it embodies.
Previously the Church stood up for Christianity, rather than water down its principles and in some cases abandon them to accommodate Islam, a faith bent on destroying Christianity and taking over our country. I was taught at the local C of E school about the aggressive nature of Islam and events of recent years have done nothing to disabuse me of that opinion.
I feel it is the church's job to stand firm and protect our society. Yes ,I know the parable of "The good Samaritan" but that does not advocate allowing one's enemies taking over and destroying one's faith and country.
I know of many active and passive members of the church who feel the same way. Perhaps that is why church attendees are diminishing.
I have always contributed to Billinge Church and am no raving "nazi", but I love my country, its traditions and Christian culture with which I was brought up and whose destruction I did not sanction.
That is why I am in the BNP, the only group standing up for Christian and British values. It is also why I have changed my will and bequeathed the sum, formerly allocated to the Church to the BNP.
I know I need not write this letter and it is not done in an intimidatory way but I feel I must in order to make you aware of the sadness I feel at the Church's betrayal of all I thought it stood for.
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
THE LIAR FRANZEN
PETER FRANZEN IS A LIAR.
He is quoted as saying peaceful demonstrators were terrified, insinuating that they were terrified by us.
If they were frightened it was by his mob. We had four people there they had possibly forty.
Our people did not have hammers and baseball bats as did his rabble.
In a letter to the paper "which we have copied" he goes completely off his rocker and accuses the four members of having German shepherd dogs with them.
He has lost all contact with reality and should be locked up.
He also says the BNP are not welcome in Wigan.
That is not for him to say. We are a legitimate party and have every right to hold our meetings anywhere.
What I do know is that many people in all parties hate him. He destroyed his own party, the decent ones leaving and I have met CAP members who wish they were rid of him.
He is a boor and a lout and was twice warned at election counts re his behaviour and he caused chaos in the council chamber.
Come on Franzen. Let's debate if you can do so without shouting or are you only able to do so as a "pavement warrior"with a mob behind you?
I WOULD BURY YOU IN DEBATE BUT I KNOW YOU WILL NOT TAKE ME ON.
COWARD. JOINED AFTER THE VIOLENCE ERUPTED? AND YOUR YOBS WERE THERE?
SAFER WHEN FORTY AGAINST FOUR?
BIG TOUGH FRANZEN THE PEOPLE'S HERO!
UAF BOOSTS BNP MORALE ... AGAIN
Lancaster Unity is the website of Lancaster UAF. It’s where Declan and Denise post, and could almost be considered as the Homepage of all of the UAF.
They have put a very interesting post up today. It’s not about the British, but rather our cousins the Germans, and it reminds me very much indeed about the numbers reading our party Homepage compared to those reading the pages of all the other political parties (combined):
A study funded by Germany’s Interior Ministry showed that more than twice as many German boys belong to anti-immigrant or neo-Nazi groups than claim membership of the major political parties’ youth organizations.
Out of more than 26,000 youths surveyed in 2007 and 2008, 4.9 percent of boys said they belonged to a “right-wing group or ‘Kamaradschaft’,” the study by Hanover-based research institute KFN showed. That compares with as many as 2 percent that belong to youth organizations for established parties.
It’s shocking that these right-wing groups can be more successful at mobilizing our youth than the established parties,” KFN Director Christian Pfeiffer told reporters today in Berlin. …
[ … ]
… Some 2.6 percent of girls said they belonged to anti-immigrant and neo-Nazi organizations.
[ … ]
The study also revealed that 29.7 percent of youths agreed with the statement that there are “too many foreigners in Germany;” another 34.8 percent tended toward that position …
So go give yourselves a morale boost. There’s nothing quite as effective for that as a good laugh:
http://lancasteruaf.blogspot.com/2009/03/german-boys-join-anti-immigrant-neo.html
Send in a comment – but do be ever so snidely polite. Might care to email Peter 'The Hammer of the People’ Franzen with the good news too (see bottom of CAP page to contact).
You can almost taste the panic and desperation, can't you.
http://www.community-action.com/
Hahahahahahahaha … oh dear, afraid my lungs are seizing up.
Morg
.
They have put a very interesting post up today. It’s not about the British, but rather our cousins the Germans, and it reminds me very much indeed about the numbers reading our party Homepage compared to those reading the pages of all the other political parties (combined):
A study funded by Germany’s Interior Ministry showed that more than twice as many German boys belong to anti-immigrant or neo-Nazi groups than claim membership of the major political parties’ youth organizations.
Out of more than 26,000 youths surveyed in 2007 and 2008, 4.9 percent of boys said they belonged to a “right-wing group or ‘Kamaradschaft’,” the study by Hanover-based research institute KFN showed. That compares with as many as 2 percent that belong to youth organizations for established parties.
It’s shocking that these right-wing groups can be more successful at mobilizing our youth than the established parties,” KFN Director Christian Pfeiffer told reporters today in Berlin. …
[ … ]
… Some 2.6 percent of girls said they belonged to anti-immigrant and neo-Nazi organizations.
[ … ]
The study also revealed that 29.7 percent of youths agreed with the statement that there are “too many foreigners in Germany;” another 34.8 percent tended toward that position …
So go give yourselves a morale boost. There’s nothing quite as effective for that as a good laugh:
http://lancasteruaf.blogspot.com/2009/03/german-boys-join-anti-immigrant-neo.html
Send in a comment – but do be ever so snidely polite. Might care to email Peter 'The Hammer of the People’ Franzen with the good news too (see bottom of CAP page to contact).
You can almost taste the panic and desperation, can't you.
http://www.community-action.com/
Hahahahahahahaha … oh dear, afraid my lungs are seizing up.
Morg
.
AFTERTHOUGHT ON THE SWP
Those of you who like me are older and can remember past events will possibly remember the former NUM secretary Joe Gormley (a Wiganer) who ,when confronted by the SWP at a conference in Blackpool shouting they wanted jobs replied "I'll get you a job tomorrow" in the pit.
With that offer they went away.
Now Joe Gormley had his critics and I have some criticisms, but underneath he was a decent man, unlike the thugs last Friday. He wanted to preserve the workers he represented, unlike Scargill who used the union to try to userp the government and lost with disastrous consequences for the miners and our country.
The Tories then put the boot in and destroyed not only the mining industry but whole communities.
We need, as British people to stick together for each other and not allow the anti British reds or New labour or the Tories to divide us.
WE SINK OR SWIM TOGETHER.
Tony Ward was a member of a party which campaigns for British jobs for British workers.
Why do the so called "Socialist Workers Party" object to this?
YOU DON'T THINK WE WILL LIE DOWN DO YOU?
We will fight for free speech and the right to have our (not publicised) meetings wherever we like.
We will fight for the British workers.
We will use this thuggish assault on democracy as propaganda.
YOU AINT SEEN NOTHIN YET!
With that offer they went away.
Now Joe Gormley had his critics and I have some criticisms, but underneath he was a decent man, unlike the thugs last Friday. He wanted to preserve the workers he represented, unlike Scargill who used the union to try to userp the government and lost with disastrous consequences for the miners and our country.
The Tories then put the boot in and destroyed not only the mining industry but whole communities.
We need, as British people to stick together for each other and not allow the anti British reds or New labour or the Tories to divide us.
WE SINK OR SWIM TOGETHER.
Tony Ward was a member of a party which campaigns for British jobs for British workers.
Why do the so called "Socialist Workers Party" object to this?
YOU DON'T THINK WE WILL LIE DOWN DO YOU?
We will fight for free speech and the right to have our (not publicised) meetings wherever we like.
We will fight for the British workers.
We will use this thuggish assault on democracy as propaganda.
YOU AINT SEEN NOTHIN YET!
Sunday, 15 March 2009
THANKS FRANZEN, SEARCHLIGHT AND UAF
I would like to thank the thugs of the far left for their help in increasing our finances and support over the last weekend.
Although we did not set out to do it we have tempted these low life out of their holes to show what they are really like.
People have had a demonstration of their thuggish tactics, contempt for democracy and the British way of life.
I FEEL ELATED! AND SO DO MY FRIENDS IN LEIGH.
More good publicity than thousands of leaflets and a lot less work.
Of course we will be following all this good publicity up with a leafletting campaign.
NOW THE PEOPLE KNOW WHAT WE ARE UP AGAINST AND WHO ARE ON THEIR SIDE.
At the roadshow people new to us were in tears at the message and this was reflected in donations and pledges of intent to join our fight to save our country.
OUR THANKS TO TONY WARD, an unintentional martyr but a good friend and activist. He showed who the real thugs are. Sorry about your injuries and get well soon Tony, but in future you will bear the scars of a true British hero.
I AM PROUD TO CALL YOU MY FRIEND!
Although we did not set out to do it we have tempted these low life out of their holes to show what they are really like.
People have had a demonstration of their thuggish tactics, contempt for democracy and the British way of life.
I FEEL ELATED! AND SO DO MY FRIENDS IN LEIGH.
More good publicity than thousands of leaflets and a lot less work.
Of course we will be following all this good publicity up with a leafletting campaign.
NOW THE PEOPLE KNOW WHAT WE ARE UP AGAINST AND WHO ARE ON THEIR SIDE.
At the roadshow people new to us were in tears at the message and this was reflected in donations and pledges of intent to join our fight to save our country.
OUR THANKS TO TONY WARD, an unintentional martyr but a good friend and activist. He showed who the real thugs are. Sorry about your injuries and get well soon Tony, but in future you will bear the scars of a true British hero.
I AM PROUD TO CALL YOU MY FRIEND!
Saturday, 14 March 2009
A DEMOCRATIC ACT?
DEMOCRACY SOCALIST STYLE
The effects of the unprovoked attack on Tony Ward by the SWP thugs can be seen below.Socialist Workers Party, now there's a contradiction in terms. I've never seen a socialist worker.
It is reminiscent of the Soviet style terminoligy which always used phrases such as "Democratic Republic" when there was no democracy.
Similarly when people call themselved "Socialist Workers" you can bet they are neither socialist nor work.
LATEST NEWS---WE ARE GETTING NAMES OF THE RABBLE.
THE BUSH TELEGRAPH IN LEIGH ALIVE AND WELL
THE REDS OUTFLANKED
An interesting day yesterday with police persecution by phone tapping and the use of threats against pubs if they held a BNP event.
They of course deny this but for them to go to our alternate venue when none of the rag bag reds knew where it was shows persecution as there could not possibly have been violence.
The fact that the police knew the new venue showed they had tapped our phones as no one apart from those closely involved knew where it was to be held.
I did not tell anyone over the phone but of course I had been informed initially by 2 phone calls.
After that people were only told if they came to my house and I knew they were sound members. They were told they must not tell anybody and they did not.
All other calls were made on an old pay as you go mobile and someone else's landline and even then the venue was not disclosed, only an RV point.
How am I sure of phone tampering?
Just after we lost the second venue and I had to inform everybody to wait for further directions my land line went off as did my mobile. At the same time the girl taking the show round (Wendy) found her phone did not work.
That is too much of a co incidence.
The police meanwhile, knowing a violent protest was scheduled left the original venue unguarded, too busy following us and trying to stop us, a legal political party having a private meeting,causing our member Tony Ward to be unprotected against hammer bearing thugs, necessitating hospital treatment.
Also I believe there was damage in Leigh caused by these low life trash but then they have no respect for people or property.
Peter Franzen's true colours are shown. What a bitter man, his party split, many of the local people can't stand him and he lost his cushy number on Wigan Metro thanks to our intervention in Golborne.
HARDLY A DEMOCRAT HE WAS WARNED BY THE POLICE AT ELECTION COUNTS ON ACCOUNT OF HIS BOORISH BEHAVIOUR.
HE IS JUST AN UNCOUTH YOB and legal action will be taken.
WHAT A BITTER TWISTED COMRADE!
NOW THE GOOD BIT.
WE HAD A FANTASTIC SHOW AT OUR NEW VENUE AND TOOK IN THE REGION OF £4000.
We had worked on making between 1 and 2 thousand but people were motivated to dig even deeper by this display of what we are up against.
We also learned much about the underhand tactics of the police and plans have been put in place to wrong foot them in future. We've even had the offer of a new venue by someone disgusted with the STAZI actions of the police.
THE EVENTS OF YESTERDAY DID OUR CAUSE A LOT OF GOOD.
If it was not for innocent people being inconvenienced I would say keep it up, but I respect the people of Leigh too much to wish that on them.
Im now off for a quiet beer, knackered but satisfied at a job well done.
They of course deny this but for them to go to our alternate venue when none of the rag bag reds knew where it was shows persecution as there could not possibly have been violence.
The fact that the police knew the new venue showed they had tapped our phones as no one apart from those closely involved knew where it was to be held.
I did not tell anyone over the phone but of course I had been informed initially by 2 phone calls.
After that people were only told if they came to my house and I knew they were sound members. They were told they must not tell anybody and they did not.
All other calls were made on an old pay as you go mobile and someone else's landline and even then the venue was not disclosed, only an RV point.
How am I sure of phone tampering?
Just after we lost the second venue and I had to inform everybody to wait for further directions my land line went off as did my mobile. At the same time the girl taking the show round (Wendy) found her phone did not work.
That is too much of a co incidence.
The police meanwhile, knowing a violent protest was scheduled left the original venue unguarded, too busy following us and trying to stop us, a legal political party having a private meeting,causing our member Tony Ward to be unprotected against hammer bearing thugs, necessitating hospital treatment.
Also I believe there was damage in Leigh caused by these low life trash but then they have no respect for people or property.
Peter Franzen's true colours are shown. What a bitter man, his party split, many of the local people can't stand him and he lost his cushy number on Wigan Metro thanks to our intervention in Golborne.
HARDLY A DEMOCRAT HE WAS WARNED BY THE POLICE AT ELECTION COUNTS ON ACCOUNT OF HIS BOORISH BEHAVIOUR.
HE IS JUST AN UNCOUTH YOB and legal action will be taken.
WHAT A BITTER TWISTED COMRADE!
NOW THE GOOD BIT.
WE HAD A FANTASTIC SHOW AT OUR NEW VENUE AND TOOK IN THE REGION OF £4000.
We had worked on making between 1 and 2 thousand but people were motivated to dig even deeper by this display of what we are up against.
We also learned much about the underhand tactics of the police and plans have been put in place to wrong foot them in future. We've even had the offer of a new venue by someone disgusted with the STAZI actions of the police.
THE EVENTS OF YESTERDAY DID OUR CAUSE A LOT OF GOOD.
If it was not for innocent people being inconvenienced I would say keep it up, but I respect the people of Leigh too much to wish that on them.
Im now off for a quiet beer, knackered but satisfied at a job well done.
Friday, 13 March 2009
THE BEAST IS LOOSE
One of my regular daily blog visits is “Gates of Vienna”, and American blog, usually commenting on European Islamic-related affairs, owned and run by a man and wife who call themselves Baron Bodissey and Dymphna. Strange as it may be to say this, as we stereotypically consider Americans to tend towards the insular and inward-looking, I usually find I can learn more about what’s going on with Islam on this side of the Atlantic by going here, rather than to any European blogs or MSM outlets, including the BBC. It’s a blog I can heartily recommend.
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/
Vera Baird is our Attorney General (I think … or it could be one of those other high and mighty panjandrum positions that have sprung up under this Labour creature we call government), or something like that. Certainly one of our most senior law officers. She spouts the usual nonsense we have become accustomed to. The Baron, however, has picked up a comment on a British blog (Old Holborn – another blog rewarding to visit), by a poster who calls him/her-self “The Honest Version of Vera Baird”. It bears relating in full.
Everything’s f**ked. We welcomed these Muslims with open arms, because we have a common enemy: conservatism, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, the old values of the democratic age. We thought they would help us build the new age of post-democracy; job security and fat pensions for us, communitarianism for you, and “social justice” for all.
We knew we’d be able to call our enemies Islamophobic when they objected to multiculturalism and immigration. We turned a blind eye to the anti-feminist abuses of Islam, because the ends justify the means, and anything that helps us dismantle the last traces of a “free country” is a good thing. Every law that bans “hate speech” — or any type of speech — is a victory for us.
But the project has gone wrong. The Islamists are more powerful than us now. We have to do what they say. And now, we literally let them get away with murder. The monster has turned on its maker.
However, we are telling you about this. We are making it obvious now. Our interference in the process of justice is plain. You can all see that the Islamists can do what they like, and we dare not stand against them. We banned Wilders so that you would watch his film. We released Ahmed so that you would know that the law is powerless against him. We protect the Islamist “anti-war protesters” and arrest you if you bother them. We are sending you a message.
Because we do not have the courage to do anything. That will be your job. We are washing our hands of the whole business. We think it is too late to come up with a peaceful solution. The beast is loose.
After the new Holocaust has wiped out England’s Muslims, including the peaceful majority who are not Islamists, then we will say “It wasn’t us! It was the BNP, and the people who voted for them!”
Even though it was our fault, because we allowed Islamism to flourish in our arrogance. We gave seats in Parliament to the Islamofascists, and we gave police protection and favourable media coverage to the terrorists. And, at the last moment, with Sharia looming and the global Caliphate being assembled, we forced you to choose between Nick Griffin and Islam. And you chose one type of fascism over the other."
And the last word goes to the Baron himself – and a compliment it is indeed.
"Nobody can rant like the British. Nobody."
Morg
.
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/
Vera Baird is our Attorney General (I think … or it could be one of those other high and mighty panjandrum positions that have sprung up under this Labour creature we call government), or something like that. Certainly one of our most senior law officers. She spouts the usual nonsense we have become accustomed to. The Baron, however, has picked up a comment on a British blog (Old Holborn – another blog rewarding to visit), by a poster who calls him/her-self “The Honest Version of Vera Baird”. It bears relating in full.
Everything’s f**ked. We welcomed these Muslims with open arms, because we have a common enemy: conservatism, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, the old values of the democratic age. We thought they would help us build the new age of post-democracy; job security and fat pensions for us, communitarianism for you, and “social justice” for all.
We knew we’d be able to call our enemies Islamophobic when they objected to multiculturalism and immigration. We turned a blind eye to the anti-feminist abuses of Islam, because the ends justify the means, and anything that helps us dismantle the last traces of a “free country” is a good thing. Every law that bans “hate speech” — or any type of speech — is a victory for us.
But the project has gone wrong. The Islamists are more powerful than us now. We have to do what they say. And now, we literally let them get away with murder. The monster has turned on its maker.
However, we are telling you about this. We are making it obvious now. Our interference in the process of justice is plain. You can all see that the Islamists can do what they like, and we dare not stand against them. We banned Wilders so that you would watch his film. We released Ahmed so that you would know that the law is powerless against him. We protect the Islamist “anti-war protesters” and arrest you if you bother them. We are sending you a message.
Because we do not have the courage to do anything. That will be your job. We are washing our hands of the whole business. We think it is too late to come up with a peaceful solution. The beast is loose.
After the new Holocaust has wiped out England’s Muslims, including the peaceful majority who are not Islamists, then we will say “It wasn’t us! It was the BNP, and the people who voted for them!”
Even though it was our fault, because we allowed Islamism to flourish in our arrogance. We gave seats in Parliament to the Islamofascists, and we gave police protection and favourable media coverage to the terrorists. And, at the last moment, with Sharia looming and the global Caliphate being assembled, we forced you to choose between Nick Griffin and Islam. And you chose one type of fascism over the other."
And the last word goes to the Baron himself – and a compliment it is indeed.
"Nobody can rant like the British. Nobody."
Overall, not exactly compimentary, or even truthful about the BNP, towards the end, but I think it picks up on the mood of the British.
Morg
.
Wednesday, 11 March 2009
MORE THOUGHTS ON THE SLIME
I saw the video on the web last night of the muslim demonstrations against our soldiers. It was in the paper today. Muslims were interviewed about their views. What about our views?
I note 2 white people were arrested but non of the ugly invaders. These latter say they were born here so think they should have their say.
Does that mean if you are born in a country it is yours? If so in that case thos who were not should not be allowed to stay and that includes the parents and relatives who this trash has brought with them.
They should be ALL sent back within 1 month. The police should moniter them like they monitor BNP people wearing badges at football matches.
A sideline to this it is reported that 1000 policemen are working in spite of having a criminal record.
Meanwhile an off duty policeman, not a BNP member but wearing a party badge is sacked.
Where is the justice in this?
You can be a supporter of the IRA, muslim brotherhood or al Quaida and still be a cop, and these are anti British violent organisations.
Are we not allowed to support OUR country without being attacked and monitored? It seems not.
This Trojan Horse is taking over the country but worse
WITH THE CONNIVANCE AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF THE AUTHORITIES.
I note 2 white people were arrested but non of the ugly invaders. These latter say they were born here so think they should have their say.
Does that mean if you are born in a country it is yours? If so in that case thos who were not should not be allowed to stay and that includes the parents and relatives who this trash has brought with them.
They should be ALL sent back within 1 month. The police should moniter them like they monitor BNP people wearing badges at football matches.
A sideline to this it is reported that 1000 policemen are working in spite of having a criminal record.
Meanwhile an off duty policeman, not a BNP member but wearing a party badge is sacked.
Where is the justice in this?
You can be a supporter of the IRA, muslim brotherhood or al Quaida and still be a cop, and these are anti British violent organisations.
Are we not allowed to support OUR country without being attacked and monitored? It seems not.
This Trojan Horse is taking over the country but worse
WITH THE CONNIVANCE AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF THE AUTHORITIES.
METRO NOT BACKING WIGAN
The campaign to encourage shopping in Wigan is very laudable, but one has to ask why Wigan and other towns are dying leaving their centres a rotting core.
Can these town hall idiots not see what is causing it. High rents in the speculative buildings in the town centre encouraged by the economically illiterate Labour government and their Labour party poodles in Wigan are the cause.The reason why the town centre shops do not pay is high business taxes and rents that town centre shops have to pay.
20 years ago the rent on a small stall in the market hall was £14,000 per year and no doubt they are now more. On top of that they had business rates.
They just can't compete.The answer? Quite simple scrap business rates for town centre shops,reduce rents and car park charges for the town centre. Then we would have a thriving town centre, easily reached by public transport.
How to recoup the money thus lost? Double the taxes on out of town supermarkets.They make vast profits at the expense of town centre shops. But then they are big donors to the Labour Party, so don't hold your breath.
The fault lies solely with the planners and the idiots such as "Lord" bl***y Smith who have not the brains to see the cause.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)