...to the British press non-treatment of the same question/issue:
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110429/local/eu-absent.362821
Morg
.
Saturday, 30 April 2011
Friday, 29 April 2011
FRED, AGAIN
Ive already introduced you all to Fred Reed, (some months back ' Monkey can't let go'). Here he is again. You all know he's also talking about this country.
You can see the video here, at the site of the American Renaissance. AmRen is regarded as racist, and is, but consists mostly of articles from legitimate newspapers. It doesn’t make up its facts. The comments at the bottom are interesting in that they represent the response to the beating by a large part of the American population. Most don’t post such thoughts where the thought police can find them. They think them, and express them to friends.
Things are bad out in the world, with blacks openly furious at whites and a whole lot of whites quietly so in return. It isn’t a recipe for domestic tranquility. A price will be paid.
Two things stand out about the video. First, cell phones with video cameras built into them are changing the landscape of journalism. All teenagers and most adults now carry video cameras, the difference being that the teenagers know how to use them.
This is not unimportant. Note that such siege howitzers of the media as the BBC frequently run shaky, wobbly, low-res footage of such things as Syrian police beating people, or of citizens dying of bloody head wounds. These can be embarrassing enough to affect policy, and make it harder for repressive governments to control the press. It is now a crime in parts of the US to photograph a policeman; here, as in Syria, governments move to hide the behavior of their “security forces.” This is why China censors the internet, and Washington very much wants to. When the Egyptian public erupted, the government immediately shut down the net. It is interesting that Obama wants an “internet kill switch.”
The other salient point of the beating in Baltimore is that the Drudge Report, a huge, huge, huge site, posted the video under a banner headline almost as huge. I don’t know Matt Drudge, and so can’t speak to his motives, but he had to know that posting video of godawful beating of a white girl by blacks is Something One Doesn’t Do.
Various voices ask, Was it racial? Of course it was. You don’t beat someone into convulsing brain-damaged semi-consciousness over precedence in a line for the bathroom. Ravening homicidal hatred is needed. Welcome to the ghetto.
This sort of thing is not uncommon. In a previous life as a police reporter I encountered or knew of many instances, always of a gang of blacks beating hell out of a white, and in a manner to do serious damage. The maidens in the video wanted to hurt the girl, wanted to hur her badly, and continued kicking her dangerously when they had her helpless. It is one thing to punch someone’s lights out, another to kick him repeatedly in the head.
Always the media respond by describing the attackers as “teenagers” and “youths,” and by burying the story as quickly as possible. When I was writing my Police Beat column for the Washington Times, any mention of racial hatred disappeared during editing.
Ignoring the hatred is not going to serve anyone well, black or white. In the Cook County Jail in Chicago, I once interviewed a Three Star Perfect Elite, if my memory of the title serves, a high-ranking man in the BGD, Black Gangster Disciples. These were and probably are a serious gang. Why, I asked him, do black gang-bangers spend so much time killing other blacks?
“we’d rather kill whites, but we know we’d lose,” he said, stone cold. This disappeared in editing.
This is not remotely the sentiment of blacks in general, but of the decaying, jobless, culturally isolated slums. If if it boils over, which is entirely possible, nobody is going to like it. More accurately perhaps, a few blacks and whites would very much like it, but it would be hideous to decent people. You don’t solve a problem by hiding its existence.
Why do the media hide the attacks? I suspect that underlying the circumspection is a half-aware realization that if whites really knew what was happening, some might respond in kind, in which case God help the nation. Having no better idea what to do—I don’t either—journalists figure to keep the lid on and hope the problem goes away, which it won’t. The whole business smells of trouble.
Further, journalism is a rigorously conformist profession. You know what you have to say you believe. You say it. Joe Sobran once defined public opinion as “what everybody thinks everybody else thinks.” Exactly.
And the press corps in Washington lives in a hothouse, insulated from the rest of the country, for most of which they have contempt. They pride themselves on racial correctness yet, in a city the majority of which is black, they have only a few black friends unresembling those of the urban badlands of Northeast, and you never see them in restaurants and clubs where most patrons are black. Many seem to want to protect blacks from criticism. They don’t report reality because they don’t see it. What does this accomplish?
Thus if you point out that black schools in the cities are terrible, an assertion with which every black columnist in the US would agree, many journalists will furiously argue that it isn’t true—not quite calling you a racist, but very nearly. And so nothing changes.
Stray thought: What would you think of an oncologist who insisted that your tumor didn’t exist?
I wonder how wise this wanton inattention probably isn’t. The United States has a grave racial problem that isn’t getting better. The problem is not the black middle class, which is about like any other, but the dangerously angry underclass of the graveyard cities—Newark, Detroit, DC, Chicago, Trenton, Dade, Richmond, Atlanta, on and on. I’ve spent many nights in such places. It’s ugly. And it’s explosive. Depending on your politics, you can blame blacks, whites, God, terrorists, or sunspots, none of which changes anything.
Psychology trumps politics. We can do the liberals-vs-conservatives dance, call each other racists, howl and yowl and pose and prance. What fun. But a spring is being wound. The economy declines, auguring cuts in social subsidies and perilous unrest. Los Angeles burned. It can burn again. The hatred is still there. If there is a solution to the racial disaster, we had better find it.
Go and read some of the other Fred on Everything columns; he's always worth reading, even when he says stuff you don't like... and he will do so for sure.
http://www.fredoneverything.net/Baltimore.shtml
Morg
.
Bad Time in Baltimore
A Time for Attention
Date
.I found on the Drudge Report yesterday a cell-phone video of yet another attack against whites by feral blacks in the cities, in this case Baltimore, where in a McDonald’s two black females kicked a white girl into convulsions, presumably due to brain damage. It seems there was a dispute over precedence for the rest room.You can see the video here, at the site of the American Renaissance. AmRen is regarded as racist, and is, but consists mostly of articles from legitimate newspapers. It doesn’t make up its facts. The comments at the bottom are interesting in that they represent the response to the beating by a large part of the American population. Most don’t post such thoughts where the thought police can find them. They think them, and express them to friends.
Things are bad out in the world, with blacks openly furious at whites and a whole lot of whites quietly so in return. It isn’t a recipe for domestic tranquility. A price will be paid.
Two things stand out about the video. First, cell phones with video cameras built into them are changing the landscape of journalism. All teenagers and most adults now carry video cameras, the difference being that the teenagers know how to use them.
This is not unimportant. Note that such siege howitzers of the media as the BBC frequently run shaky, wobbly, low-res footage of such things as Syrian police beating people, or of citizens dying of bloody head wounds. These can be embarrassing enough to affect policy, and make it harder for repressive governments to control the press. It is now a crime in parts of the US to photograph a policeman; here, as in Syria, governments move to hide the behavior of their “security forces.” This is why China censors the internet, and Washington very much wants to. When the Egyptian public erupted, the government immediately shut down the net. It is interesting that Obama wants an “internet kill switch.”
The other salient point of the beating in Baltimore is that the Drudge Report, a huge, huge, huge site, posted the video under a banner headline almost as huge. I don’t know Matt Drudge, and so can’t speak to his motives, but he had to know that posting video of godawful beating of a white girl by blacks is Something One Doesn’t Do.
Various voices ask, Was it racial? Of course it was. You don’t beat someone into convulsing brain-damaged semi-consciousness over precedence in a line for the bathroom. Ravening homicidal hatred is needed. Welcome to the ghetto.
This sort of thing is not uncommon. In a previous life as a police reporter I encountered or knew of many instances, always of a gang of blacks beating hell out of a white, and in a manner to do serious damage. The maidens in the video wanted to hurt the girl, wanted to hur her badly, and continued kicking her dangerously when they had her helpless. It is one thing to punch someone’s lights out, another to kick him repeatedly in the head.
Always the media respond by describing the attackers as “teenagers” and “youths,” and by burying the story as quickly as possible. When I was writing my Police Beat column for the Washington Times, any mention of racial hatred disappeared during editing.
Ignoring the hatred is not going to serve anyone well, black or white. In the Cook County Jail in Chicago, I once interviewed a Three Star Perfect Elite, if my memory of the title serves, a high-ranking man in the BGD, Black Gangster Disciples. These were and probably are a serious gang. Why, I asked him, do black gang-bangers spend so much time killing other blacks?
“we’d rather kill whites, but we know we’d lose,” he said, stone cold. This disappeared in editing.
This is not remotely the sentiment of blacks in general, but of the decaying, jobless, culturally isolated slums. If if it boils over, which is entirely possible, nobody is going to like it. More accurately perhaps, a few blacks and whites would very much like it, but it would be hideous to decent people. You don’t solve a problem by hiding its existence.
Why do the media hide the attacks? I suspect that underlying the circumspection is a half-aware realization that if whites really knew what was happening, some might respond in kind, in which case God help the nation. Having no better idea what to do—I don’t either—journalists figure to keep the lid on and hope the problem goes away, which it won’t. The whole business smells of trouble.
Further, journalism is a rigorously conformist profession. You know what you have to say you believe. You say it. Joe Sobran once defined public opinion as “what everybody thinks everybody else thinks.” Exactly.
And the press corps in Washington lives in a hothouse, insulated from the rest of the country, for most of which they have contempt. They pride themselves on racial correctness yet, in a city the majority of which is black, they have only a few black friends unresembling those of the urban badlands of Northeast, and you never see them in restaurants and clubs where most patrons are black. Many seem to want to protect blacks from criticism. They don’t report reality because they don’t see it. What does this accomplish?
Thus if you point out that black schools in the cities are terrible, an assertion with which every black columnist in the US would agree, many journalists will furiously argue that it isn’t true—not quite calling you a racist, but very nearly. And so nothing changes.
Stray thought: What would you think of an oncologist who insisted that your tumor didn’t exist?
I wonder how wise this wanton inattention probably isn’t. The United States has a grave racial problem that isn’t getting better. The problem is not the black middle class, which is about like any other, but the dangerously angry underclass of the graveyard cities—Newark, Detroit, DC, Chicago, Trenton, Dade, Richmond, Atlanta, on and on. I’ve spent many nights in such places. It’s ugly. And it’s explosive. Depending on your politics, you can blame blacks, whites, God, terrorists, or sunspots, none of which changes anything.
Psychology trumps politics. We can do the liberals-vs-conservatives dance, call each other racists, howl and yowl and pose and prance. What fun. But a spring is being wound. The economy declines, auguring cuts in social subsidies and perilous unrest. Los Angeles burned. It can burn again. The hatred is still there. If there is a solution to the racial disaster, we had better find it.
Go and read some of the other Fred on Everything columns; he's always worth reading, even when he says stuff you don't like... and he will do so for sure.
http://www.fredoneverything.net/Baltimore.shtml
Morg
.
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
BADLUCK FOR GOODLUCK
Elections were held in Nigeria last week which were judged by international observers as fair which is unusual in an African state.
This however did not stop rioting and bloodshed.
Why?
Because the North of the country is muslim and the South is Christian and the winner the strangely named Goodluck Jonathan was named the president.
In spite of his name he has the badluck of having a muslim population in the North of his country which does not believe in democracy and when they lose an election resort to violence.
It is Goodluck's badluck that although fairly elected his country has a large minority of muslims who do not believe in the rule of law or democracy.
What has this got to do with us? you may ask.
Well it illustrates the danger when muslims meet with non muslims in one country and the former's violence in the promotion of their aims.
Yes well that is Africa you may well say, and so it is but muslims are the same the world over, always aggressive and not amenable to the non muslim rule of law.
This is a scenario we will face before long if we allow this alien medieval cult to expand in our country.
We must halt ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION into our country now and curtail the activities of those already here.
The trouble in the Ivory Coast has a similar cause, muslim violence against non muslims.
Wherever in the world from Asia to Africa the devotees of this evil cult impinge on the other moderate and more civilised people there is trouble.
We must avoid the badluck that Goodluck has to put up with in his own country.
So I wish you luck Goodluck in your fight against barbarism and hope you can snuff this evil cancer from your land, and I hope our government can see the dangers of the same happening here.
This however did not stop rioting and bloodshed.
Why?
Because the North of the country is muslim and the South is Christian and the winner the strangely named Goodluck Jonathan was named the president.
In spite of his name he has the badluck of having a muslim population in the North of his country which does not believe in democracy and when they lose an election resort to violence.
It is Goodluck's badluck that although fairly elected his country has a large minority of muslims who do not believe in the rule of law or democracy.
What has this got to do with us? you may ask.
Well it illustrates the danger when muslims meet with non muslims in one country and the former's violence in the promotion of their aims.
Yes well that is Africa you may well say, and so it is but muslims are the same the world over, always aggressive and not amenable to the non muslim rule of law.
This is a scenario we will face before long if we allow this alien medieval cult to expand in our country.
We must halt ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION into our country now and curtail the activities of those already here.
The trouble in the Ivory Coast has a similar cause, muslim violence against non muslims.
Wherever in the world from Asia to Africa the devotees of this evil cult impinge on the other moderate and more civilised people there is trouble.
We must avoid the badluck that Goodluck has to put up with in his own country.
So I wish you luck Goodluck in your fight against barbarism and hope you can snuff this evil cancer from your land, and I hope our government can see the dangers of the same happening here.
Monday, 18 April 2011
WHY IS NATIONALISM NOT PROGRESSING IN BRITAIN?
The news last week that the nationalist True Finns party gained 29% of the vote in their country gives the nationalists of Europe cause for hope.
The Finns, a brave country who have suffered and repelled invaders, notably the Soviet Union have once again shown their independence and their wish for freedom and the good nationalist vote in that country is putting strains on the European superstate.
One can understand these brave people who have so bravely protected their country over the years and built up great shipbuilding and electronics industries without the "benefits" of diversity in a harsh climate.
They have fought and suffered for their freedom and built their industries and asked for nothing but the right to run their country as they wish.
This people is composed of patriots, and having fought for freedom will not give it up lightly.
Other European countries such as Denmark and Holland are also embracing the nationalist cause, seeing that the EU is Communism or Naziism lite as yet.
Our leaders still occasionally talk the talk but will not walk the walk and continue to appease the EU and allow hordes of aliens into our country against the wishes of the people.
Even the supposedly "patriotic" UKIP has newly arrived Sri Lankan to leaflet for them, a sure demonstration that they are just a safety valve for disaffected Tories.
What is wrong with our people?
Perhaps we haqve not suffered enough to value our nation and its culture as the Finns and Danes have.
BUT ask people in the street whether they agree with the policies of the BNP and over 50% say they do BUT THEY DON'T VOTE FOR US.
WHY?
One reason of course is apathy. I'm alright Jack, for now and they can not see the impending economic and demographic catastrophe.
Another reason is the continuous vilification of our party by the capitalist controlled media who see us as a threat to their globalist agenda which would see the people as units of production or consumption in "the post democratic society", not my words but those of Peter Mandelson.
However possibly an even bigger reason is us, our party which has not capitalised on the growing discontent of the people.
The British National Party has been run inefficiently both financially and structurally. It's no good having good policies if they are not put in a way that resonates with the public.
It's no good having a party with a structure so shambolic that no one knows who is doing what and good and senior members are sacked for asking questions and those financial questions are not answered.
In effect the party is inefficient in finance and structure.
HOWEVER the main fault with the Party is that it is not democratic and the leader has so much power that no one dare question it.
Nick Griffin has done a lot for the BNP and worked but no one is perfect and he has made some howling mistakes which have set back our cause.
He has become a liability and many people, although they agree with our policies will not support us while he is leader.
He has too much baggage and although many on the Left have similar and worse baggage in the political climate we must have a leader who is squeaky clean. That is the nature of politics in Britain now, and we and he has to accept that, unjust though it is.
If he really believes in Nationalism he should step down and we would thank him for that.
If he decides to remain as leader and contests the next challenge he will show he cares more about himself than the cause.
There are many good people who could take his place or could develop into leaders but such is the dictatorship of the present setup they dare not put their heads above the parapet or they risk expulsion.
WE need a new leader and one will emerge.
Even more we need unity, to put past differences behind us and work together for the sake of our country and future.
We need to keep our membership in the Party or we will not have the chance to elect a new and even better leader, untainted by past indiscretions. Small splinter parties will achieve nothing.
ABOVE ALL we need honesty. Nationalism is on the rise all over Europe and we need to ask "why is it not rising here"?
If we can not be honest with ourselves and realise our own weaknesses and shortcomings we will fail to progress as patriots in other countries have.
AND WE WILL NOT DESERVE TO for if we can not run a party efficiently when the people are crying out for a voice-- how will we ever be fit to run a country?
The Finns, a brave country who have suffered and repelled invaders, notably the Soviet Union have once again shown their independence and their wish for freedom and the good nationalist vote in that country is putting strains on the European superstate.
One can understand these brave people who have so bravely protected their country over the years and built up great shipbuilding and electronics industries without the "benefits" of diversity in a harsh climate.
They have fought and suffered for their freedom and built their industries and asked for nothing but the right to run their country as they wish.
This people is composed of patriots, and having fought for freedom will not give it up lightly.
Other European countries such as Denmark and Holland are also embracing the nationalist cause, seeing that the EU is Communism or Naziism lite as yet.
Our leaders still occasionally talk the talk but will not walk the walk and continue to appease the EU and allow hordes of aliens into our country against the wishes of the people.
Even the supposedly "patriotic" UKIP has newly arrived Sri Lankan to leaflet for them, a sure demonstration that they are just a safety valve for disaffected Tories.
What is wrong with our people?
Perhaps we haqve not suffered enough to value our nation and its culture as the Finns and Danes have.
BUT ask people in the street whether they agree with the policies of the BNP and over 50% say they do BUT THEY DON'T VOTE FOR US.
WHY?
One reason of course is apathy. I'm alright Jack, for now and they can not see the impending economic and demographic catastrophe.
Another reason is the continuous vilification of our party by the capitalist controlled media who see us as a threat to their globalist agenda which would see the people as units of production or consumption in "the post democratic society", not my words but those of Peter Mandelson.
However possibly an even bigger reason is us, our party which has not capitalised on the growing discontent of the people.
The British National Party has been run inefficiently both financially and structurally. It's no good having good policies if they are not put in a way that resonates with the public.
It's no good having a party with a structure so shambolic that no one knows who is doing what and good and senior members are sacked for asking questions and those financial questions are not answered.
In effect the party is inefficient in finance and structure.
HOWEVER the main fault with the Party is that it is not democratic and the leader has so much power that no one dare question it.
Nick Griffin has done a lot for the BNP and worked but no one is perfect and he has made some howling mistakes which have set back our cause.
He has become a liability and many people, although they agree with our policies will not support us while he is leader.
He has too much baggage and although many on the Left have similar and worse baggage in the political climate we must have a leader who is squeaky clean. That is the nature of politics in Britain now, and we and he has to accept that, unjust though it is.
If he really believes in Nationalism he should step down and we would thank him for that.
If he decides to remain as leader and contests the next challenge he will show he cares more about himself than the cause.
There are many good people who could take his place or could develop into leaders but such is the dictatorship of the present setup they dare not put their heads above the parapet or they risk expulsion.
WE need a new leader and one will emerge.
Even more we need unity, to put past differences behind us and work together for the sake of our country and future.
We need to keep our membership in the Party or we will not have the chance to elect a new and even better leader, untainted by past indiscretions. Small splinter parties will achieve nothing.
ABOVE ALL we need honesty. Nationalism is on the rise all over Europe and we need to ask "why is it not rising here"?
If we can not be honest with ourselves and realise our own weaknesses and shortcomings we will fail to progress as patriots in other countries have.
AND WE WILL NOT DESERVE TO for if we can not run a party efficiently when the people are crying out for a voice-- how will we ever be fit to run a country?
ONE LAW FOR SOME ...
The moron who burned the poppies at the Remembrance Day service gets a £50 fine and outraged a nation.
London Evening Standard
Cumberland News.
The word disproportionate seems to apply here. After all if some idiot artist can put on display a bible to be defaced and has nothing done to them. this guy should surely have expected the same, save I suppose that he didn't call it art.
I suspect Andrew Ryan will end up a hero in some quarters, despite the theft, I have to admit I don't like the idea of burning books, but I have never felt so close to burning a Koran as I've done this afternoon, sadly though I now know the cost of freedom of expression and that's 70 days in jail.
 |
| Emdadur Choudhury Islamic scumbag |
Now a guy who burns a Koran in protest gets a 70 day prison sentence.The Prime Minister told the Commons that a "stronger statement" should have been made to show public disgust at the man's action."I think to many of us, you look at something like that and feel that we should be making a stronger statement that the sort of behaviour is out of order and has no place in a tolerant country," he said.
Cumberland News.
Ok it wasn't his Koran, he stole it from the library, however that normally involves just a fine not a custodial sentence, but 70 days for outraging Muslims whilst the moron who burned a poppy and outraged the nation gets only a £50 fine?A man who burned a copy of the Koran in Carlisle city centre was today jailed for 70 days.Andrew Ryan, 32, of Summerhill, off London Road, was accompanied to Carlisle Magistrates' Court by supporters carrying a St George's Cross flag who were chanting "We love you England".
Ryan had pleaded guilty to racially aggravated harrassment and theft of the Koran holy book from Carlisle Library at an earlier hearing.
The word disproportionate seems to apply here. After all if some idiot artist can put on display a bible to be defaced and has nothing done to them. this guy should surely have expected the same, save I suppose that he didn't call it art.
I suspect Andrew Ryan will end up a hero in some quarters, despite the theft, I have to admit I don't like the idea of burning books, but I have never felt so close to burning a Koran as I've done this afternoon, sadly though I now know the cost of freedom of expression and that's 70 days in jail.
ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL
BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
George Orwell, Animal Farm Chapter 10.
Read the rest - comments are good.
Morg
.
Saturday, 16 April 2011
COWS
I read this somewhere on the internet; forgotten where:
Makes you think, eh?
Morg
.
Is it just me, or does anyone else find it amazing that during the mad cow epidemic our government could track a single cow, born in Appleby almost three years ago, right to the stall where she slept in the county of Cumbria?
And, they even tracked her calves to their stalls. But they are unable to locate 125,000 illegal immigrants wandering around our country. Maybe we should give each of them a cow. Makes you think, eh?
Morg
.
Thursday, 14 April 2011
ANDREW BRONS BNP MEP - HOW TO CONDUCT INTERVIEWS WITH THE LEFT WING PRESS
This is how the British National Party should be. Andrew Brons shows how to conduct interviews by the Far Laft NUJ led Media.
Well done Andrew.
Well done Andrew.
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
Labour25 the official video of the Labour Party Beasts
New Labour supports PAEDOPHILES which is why they have at least 25 in the party.
Harriet Harman is a major supporter of RIGHTS for PAEDOPHILES and wants to LOWER the AGE OF CONSENT.
Now I wonder why that is ?
Lord Longford (Marxist Labour peer and uncle to Marxist and known Zionist Labour party Shadow Secretary of State and Shadow Deputy Prime Minister Harriet Harman) - Was obsessed with paedophile child killer Myra Hindley
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
Lessons from the Ivory Coast
The most important aspects of the crisis in the Ivory Coast are being overlooked or deliberately disguised by the Western media. One can read media report after media report without discovering the basic fact that the Northern Ivory Coast “rebels” are Muslims. Indeed they are Muslims who by and large entered the Ivory Coast as infiltrators, through borders that are poorly patrolled, from neighboring countries. A better advertisement for stronger border control cannot be found. At least four million illegal immigrants, mostly Muslim, entered the Ivory Coast during the past two decades, tilting the demographic balance there.
And these Muslim infiltrators and interlopers, increasingly backed by African, French and Western powers, are challenging the control by Ivory Coast natives over their own country. The sufferings and violence in the Ivory Coast may well illustrate what awaits Europe if it continues its own demographic suicide and if it continues to flood itself with Muslim immigrants. The conflict also illustrates the extent to which the Western powers are willing to subvert their commitment to Wilsonian principles. Since Woodrow Wilson and the end of World War I, the West was nominally committed to erecting and defending nation states. We now see that the Western powers (and African regimes) are willing to abandon this set of principles whenever faced with a cheap way to curry favor with Muslims. Finally, it shows what awaits Israel if its seditious Left ever has its way and implements a Palestinian “Right of Return” that converts Israel into a “bi-national state.”
The Ivory Coast of today, or Côte d’Ivoire, is essentially a bi-national state, although each “nation” is in fact a collection of tribes. The northern “nation” is Muslim; the southern “nation” consists of Christians and other Non-Muslims. Built upon a territory that had once been home to several tribal statelets before the era of colonization, it fell under French partial control in the 1840s, and became a formal French colony in 1893. French is still the official language spoken there, in addition to many local tribal tongues. The French hung around until 1960, when the Ivory Coast became independent. Once independent, the country was one of the most prosperous in Africa, thanks to its large cocoa crop. The country has been politically unstable since a coup in 1999 and a civil war that began in 2002.
The background to the civil war and the current constitutional crisis is the massive in-migration of Muslims from the countries neighboring the Ivory Coast, mainly from Burkina Faso. The infiltrators settled in the northern half of the country, and also in pockets in the south, including in some neighborhoods inside the country’s largest city, Abidjan. Today Muslims, including illegals, are almost 40% of the population of the country (although Muslim and other sources claim they are really considerably higher), the remainder being a mixture of Christians (mainly Roman Catholics) and animists.
Tensions between the immigrant population and the indigenous Ivorians goes back to the 1960s. Successive governments there have regarded the immigrants to be “circumstantial Ivorians” (their term), as opposed to the “pure Ivorians,” who are the natives. The illegal “aliens” constitute more than a quarter of the current population of the country. The alien-native dichotomy overlaps to a large extent with the divisions between non-Muslims and Muslims, and is the most important background factor in explaining the ongoing civil war.
The current political standoff in the Ivory Coast is largely a Muslim-Christian confrontation. The “rebels” represent the Muslims of the country, especially of the north, and in particular the “aliens.” They are led by Hassan Ouattara, whose parents were evidently illegal immigrants into the Ivory Coast from Burkina Faso. Hence he personally illustrates and epitomizes the “alien” character of the “rebel” forces. An economist who once worked for the IMF, he calls his rebel militia the “New Force.” The “government” forces represent the indigenous and traditional non-Muslim Ivorians. Their leader is the current President (or, if you prefer, “president”) Laurent Gbagbo, a one-time university professor, who has been the official head of state since 2000. He claims to be a socialist and anti-imperialist. The government claims that neighboring Muslim states have intervened in the civil war on the side of the Muslims
Civil war broke out in the country in 2002. The “rebels,” whose support base is the Muslim north, challenged the “government,” whose power base was the non-Muslim south. Atrocities were committed on both sides. Each side accuses the other of using mercenaries. French military forces in the country participated in some of the fighting, increasingly on the side of the “rebels.”
The elections that were to have taken place in 2005 were postponed repeatedly until 2010, in part at the initiative of the UN. A power-sharing arrangement between the two main sides in the conflict went into effect in 2007 but did not hold for long. None of the forces in the country seemed to want new elections to be held, since electoral forces were evenly matched between the two halves of the now “bi-national” state. When they were eventually held in 2010, Gbagbo lost by a thin margin. But he refused to accept those results as conclusive and compelling. Aside from claims of widespread fraud, Gbagbo insisted that the victory of the party of Ouattaro was entirely thanks to the votes of the millions of illegal immigrants participating in the election!
Other African countries, led by predominantly-Muslim Nigeria, have been backing the “rebels.” A number of African countries have called for armed intervention on the side of those “rebels.” After a period of respite, violence began to escalate a few weeks ago. New Forces, now renamed the Republican Forces of Côte d’Ivoire (RFCI) have been beating Gbagbo’s army in the field, took the country’s capital city, and are now holding parts of Abidjan. Gbagbo is under siege in his headquarters and expected to fall any day now. Hundreds of thousands of people have fled the battle zones, seeking refuge in neighboring countries, especially Liberia.
The conflict is too complex for a simplistic assignment of forces into categories of “good buys” and “bad guys.” There are solid bases for skepticism about the true commitment to democratic rule by either side.
Nevertheless, the conflict in the Ivory Coast shows what happens when massive illegal immigration leads to the demographic eclipse of a native population. The same Western powers so ready to strip the Serbs of their heartland to create a second Albanian nation-state in Kosovo have been unwilling to sustain any nation-state for indigenous Ivorians, and indeed have backed the aliens. Evidently the Western countries still adhere to Wilsonian principles about ethnic states and self-determination only when it is to the liking of Muslims.
But the even more obvious lesson from all this is the instability of “bi-national” states and the impossibility of preventing them from morphing into killing grounds. This should have been obvious from the experiences in Rwanda.
Yet this is precisely the fashionable “solution” to the Middle East conflict being promoted by the Bash-Israel Lobby. The bigots and boycotters demand that Israel agree to be demolished and enfolded into a larger “bi-national state,” one that would be dominated by Arabs and Muslims. Such an experiment in “bi-nationalism” would end in the best-case scenario as a civil war resembling the one in the Ivory Coast, and in the worst-case scenario in a Rwandan-style genocide. Ultimately, a new genocide against Jews is exactly what the Anti-Israel Lobby seeks. It is also the hidden agenda of the “BDS” (or Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement of economic aggression against Israel, and its close ally, the “Israel Apartheid Week” Hitlerjugend.
Massive Muslim immigration is also transforming Europe demographically, in ways strikingly similar to the influx of immigrants into the Ivory Coast. France, Belgium, and other parts of Western Europe may soon find themselves the European Ivorians, the “Other,” the stranger and disenfranchised inside their own home countries.
Morg
.
Saturday, 9 April 2011
MORE ABOUT THE EU AND OUR ARMED FORCES CUTS.
Gutting our defences
Over 6,000 military service personnel and defence ministry civil servants are facing compulsory redundancies, ahead of Friday’s cabinet decision on how to make savings of €1bn in the defence budget, NOS television reports.The reporting makes it sound as if 'some' tanks are scrapped, but in actuality all Leopard MBTs will we stricken from the inventory, as will all Cougar transport helicopters and, astonishingly, all minesweepers. The Navy alone will lose a quarter of its capability. That in a time when piracy is rampant and Dutch shipping companies are turning to the Navy for support.
In total, 12,300 defence ministry jobs will go as part of the savings package, NOS says. Some 2,300 vacancies will not be filled and a further 4,000 people will not be replaced when they leave.
The ministry currently has a workforce of almost 69,000.
The job losses will affect all ranks in the defence ministry, according to government sources quoted in the Volkskrant.
Defence minister Hans Hillen also plans to scrap tanks and Cougar helicopters, to cut the 87 F-16 fighter jets by around a third and to sell off a number of naval vessels.
The controversial purchase of a second JSF fighter jet for €100m will go ahead to protect the participation of Dutch firms in its development and production.
This gutting of our armed forces is necessary, according to our government, to realize a budget cut of 1 billion euros.
Let me put this into perspective. From the website of the Central Bureau of Statistics I gleaned the following overview of defence spending from 2003 to 2009:
2003 7.404 bln
2004 7.551 bln
2005 7.693 bln
2006 8.145 bln === Start of Uruzgan mission
2007 8.388 bln
2008 8.488 bln
2009 8.733 bln
Definitive numbers for 2010 and 2011 are not yet available from the CBS website, but the budgets published on the ministry of defences website seems to indicate these numbers are between the spending of 2008 and 2009.
What this shows is that heading the Taskforce Uruzgan if Afghanistan increased the Dutch defence budget by 1.1 billion euros. Since the Dutch withdrew from Uruzgan late last year, one would think the cuts needed would or could restore the status quo ante, when we also has a functioning and capable armed services.
I am not in a position to argue whether the status quo ante is desirable, nor am I arguing that we should. I am just making the observation that even with the budget reduced by a cool billion, we were entirely capable to field a believable army, navy and air force.
So, what changed? What is going on here? Why does a budget cut of 1 billion euro make a gutting of our armed forces imperative? I get the uncomfortable feeling that there is something more at play here.
The cuts made are so deep and wide that hardly a single arm of our forces will, after the cuts are effected, be able to operate independently. In a conflict high in the violence spectrum, the Dutch can operate as recon for those armed services that have tanks, while Dutch infantry in such a conflict will have to depend on tanks from foreign services for back up. The same goes for the navy and the air force.
These cuts, the way they are being made, give the distinct impression that this government is out to ensure that Dutch armed forces will of necessity have to co-operate with the services of other nations to operate safely and effectively.
And why is that a bad thing? Because any national defence capability that is dependent on the active cooperation and involvement of another nation before it can be deployed is, by definition, not sovereign. The Dutch government is actively abdicating one of the key areas, one of the most important core businesses, of any government anywhere: To protect the people and the country it serves from threats, from without or from within.
The most infuriating part of it is that these measures are taken by a government that is supposed to be right-wing. Moreover, PM Mark Ruttes own party, conservative liberal VDD, made it an election promise to halt the slow decay of our armed forces. Indeed, they did. They stopped the decay by quickly, allright, and are actively tearing our army, navy and air force down now. That's progress, I guess (!).
That ugly head you see rearing goes by the name of van Rompuy, the little troll pretending to be president to all Europeans. Earlier we saw a same gutting of the armed forces in the UK. This has been used as a pretext to boost the "Anglo-French military co-operation" amply documented by Dr. Richard North here, here and here. At the time Dr. North observed: 'Anyone who thinks that Anglo-French military "co-operation" isn't a Trojan Horse for the EU Army needs their brains examined'. It isn't overly paranoid to suspect the same type of mechanism being deployed by the Dutch government to hand over our armed forces to the EUnion. And typically, this angle is completely ignored by what passes for our independent main stream media.
Once again we are betrayed by those we entrusted with looking out for our interests. These new cuts in our military are as clear a sign as any that even this new right-wing government is hell-bent on destroying Dutch sovereignty and delivering us into the hands of that alien power, the EUnion. The feeling of being let down, of once again being betrayed by persons I thought, I was assured, I could trust, is all the more jarring, compared to the hope the installing of a right-wing, Danish-style cabinet engendered in those heady days last fall.
This much is now clear: Even a nominally right-wing government will not defend us. We are on our own. Our government is unwilling, as far as it is still able, to look out for our interest.
And beyond the current defence cuts, we have our MPs similarly abdicating their responsibilities. By and large they are representing not our, but their own interests. Our MSM is actively engaged in feeding us propaganda and preventing us from finding out what is really going on. Even THE symbol of our nation, the royal family, have left the Dutch to fend for themselves, while they actively promote the tranzi cause.
We are alone and have only ourselves to turn to for the defence of our freedom, our sovereignty and our prosperity. And it is time to start being seriously angry about this state of affairs.
http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2011/04/this-week-dutch-armed-forces-were-hit.html
Now look at what's happening to our armed forces. It's the EU playing its games.
Morg
.
Thursday, 7 April 2011
GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP
Last month there was a peaceful demonstration in Birkenhead by the group "Lawful Rebellion" in which a judge was arrested amid scenes of chaos in the court.
The demonstration was because the judiciary are going beyond their remit by sitting in a court which contradicts the Magna Carta and Bill of Rights and thus renders them liable to arrest for treason, and this is what happened.
Now whatever the rights and wrongs about this case the actions since uncover something sinister.
The proceedings were filmed and publicised on you tube and indeed a film was put on our blog.
HOWEVER,
The film has now been taken off you tube "on instructions from the government"
You would be entitled to ask why?
NOT MUCH OPENNESS HERE IS THERE
This footage was amateur footage with no copyright so why are the government so anxious to have it taken down? It was just a record of what happened.
Are they frightened that people may see it and realise the con trick which is being visited on us?
The film has evidently frightened the powers that be, the same powers that complained about censorship in China.
They have exposed themselves as complicit in censorship and confirmed the justice of those protesting.
WE ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT A COUNTRY OF FREE SPEECH.
I am sure the organisers of the event will have a DVD copy which can be circulated, but in any case many will have aready have seen the video.
If anybody has a copy please let me know and I will duplicate as many as necessary (a thousand if they want) to spread the message, a message that has been shown to have frightened the authorities by their actions.
We will overcome this censorship as we are not in China,AND I WILL DO MY UTMOST TO SPREAD THE TRUTH.
THIS IS JUST THE START OF THE PEOPLE'S FIGHTBACK
The demonstration was because the judiciary are going beyond their remit by sitting in a court which contradicts the Magna Carta and Bill of Rights and thus renders them liable to arrest for treason, and this is what happened.
Now whatever the rights and wrongs about this case the actions since uncover something sinister.
The proceedings were filmed and publicised on you tube and indeed a film was put on our blog.
HOWEVER,
The film has now been taken off you tube "on instructions from the government"
You would be entitled to ask why?
NOT MUCH OPENNESS HERE IS THERE
This footage was amateur footage with no copyright so why are the government so anxious to have it taken down? It was just a record of what happened.
Are they frightened that people may see it and realise the con trick which is being visited on us?
The film has evidently frightened the powers that be, the same powers that complained about censorship in China.
They have exposed themselves as complicit in censorship and confirmed the justice of those protesting.
WE ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT A COUNTRY OF FREE SPEECH.
I am sure the organisers of the event will have a DVD copy which can be circulated, but in any case many will have aready have seen the video.
If anybody has a copy please let me know and I will duplicate as many as necessary (a thousand if they want) to spread the message, a message that has been shown to have frightened the authorities by their actions.
We will overcome this censorship as we are not in China,AND I WILL DO MY UTMOST TO SPREAD THE TRUTH.
THIS IS JUST THE START OF THE PEOPLE'S FIGHTBACK
UAF DEMO BLACKBURN
To the far left of the screen at 2mins 50secs you can see Martin Smith SWP/UAF SCUM with a Steward, who Smith hands out quite a bit of cash to, and a FAT BLOKE with a Blue shirt on and Black Hoodie (The same shirt that he has worn everytime the SCUM tried to disrupt our Tabletops in Wigan and Ashton Town Centres), does anyone know who he is ?
CAMERON'S TREACHERY
Cameron gets even worse.
On his visit to Pakistan (as always with his token Paki, the unelected "baroness" ? arsi) he gives them £650 million for education and help with the technology to diffuse roadside bombs.
In addition he says that many of the troubles of the world are down "to the British" in an effort to curry (a good word in that context)favour with his continually begging hosts.
So let's look at this in detail from modern and historic aspects. This year it has been announced that there will be cuts to our education budgets owing the need to make savings and student fees have been increased.
It seems therefore that there is no money to educate our own but sufficient to educate Pakistani children, no doubt by islamic extremists. There is money to help them combat bombs as well even though our own forces are being reduced as unaffordable and servicemen given their P 45s.
In other words we are paying for protection of Pakistani people while neglecting our own security.
I don't really care how many people are blown up by roadside bombs in Pakistan. It is of no concern to us and there is no way that failed country will stop terrorism, after all it is a muslim state and terrorism and islam go together.
My second gripe about the action of this idiot we have for a Prime Minister is when he blames Britain for many of the world's ills. He was perhaps talking about Kashmir but again that was not the fault of "the British" but muslim/ Hindu rivalry which occured after we had left.
Who does he mean by Britain? Surely not the British people. Our people have not been responsible for most of the ills perpetrated in our name. It has always been the ruling elite, no doubt in order to line their greedy pockets who have been responsible. To go back nearly 100 years it was our rulers who agreed to set up the state of Israel to gain favours and money from the Zionists in our country, ignoring that Palestine had been inhabited for humdreds of years by muslims.
These tribes although primitive and of a medieval faith did not take kindly to being dispossessed of their land and the hatred still remains, bolstered by ours and America's continued support for that illegal state.
Yes the British government has connived against the Arabs and other muslims ever since causing them to retaliate in atrocities such as 9/11. This led to a kneejerk "war on terrorism" by invading Iraq and Afghanistan against the will of the people Now they are interfering in Libya again against our will, even as our armed forces are depleted and we are as a nation in debt.
The government tries to spin its actions as humanitarian but a look at where they take place shows that these "humanitarian" actions are very selective. No action in Syria, Bahrein or Ivory Coast, or in the past Darfur or Rwanda. Why the difference? NO IT IS NOT OIL. We could do as China does and keep out of these conflicts and buy the resources. IT IS ALL ABOUT MONEY, the money controlled by the elite of this country, the politicians and their friends in the City.
No Mr Cameron, we the people do not agree with your warlike actions and your interference in other's business for your own globalist financial agenda and
WE ARE NOT TAKING THE BLAME.
YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS IN THE CITY CAUSED MUCH OF THE TROUBLE.
WE, THE POOR BLOODY INFANTRY PAID AND DIED FOR YOUR MISTAKES AND GREED.
And you allow people who you have caused to hate us almost free entry into our country to cause dissent and mayhem here while prosecuting and vilifying those who object.
It is obvious you and your Common Purpose Globalist friends are intent on destroying our country FOR YOUR OWN ENDS.
THAT IS YOUR ULTIMATE AGENDA.
OUR JOB IS TO PREVENT IT BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE.
On his visit to Pakistan (as always with his token Paki, the unelected "baroness" ? arsi) he gives them £650 million for education and help with the technology to diffuse roadside bombs.
In addition he says that many of the troubles of the world are down "to the British" in an effort to curry (a good word in that context)favour with his continually begging hosts.
So let's look at this in detail from modern and historic aspects. This year it has been announced that there will be cuts to our education budgets owing the need to make savings and student fees have been increased.
It seems therefore that there is no money to educate our own but sufficient to educate Pakistani children, no doubt by islamic extremists. There is money to help them combat bombs as well even though our own forces are being reduced as unaffordable and servicemen given their P 45s.
In other words we are paying for protection of Pakistani people while neglecting our own security.
I don't really care how many people are blown up by roadside bombs in Pakistan. It is of no concern to us and there is no way that failed country will stop terrorism, after all it is a muslim state and terrorism and islam go together.
My second gripe about the action of this idiot we have for a Prime Minister is when he blames Britain for many of the world's ills. He was perhaps talking about Kashmir but again that was not the fault of "the British" but muslim/ Hindu rivalry which occured after we had left.
Who does he mean by Britain? Surely not the British people. Our people have not been responsible for most of the ills perpetrated in our name. It has always been the ruling elite, no doubt in order to line their greedy pockets who have been responsible. To go back nearly 100 years it was our rulers who agreed to set up the state of Israel to gain favours and money from the Zionists in our country, ignoring that Palestine had been inhabited for humdreds of years by muslims.
These tribes although primitive and of a medieval faith did not take kindly to being dispossessed of their land and the hatred still remains, bolstered by ours and America's continued support for that illegal state.
Yes the British government has connived against the Arabs and other muslims ever since causing them to retaliate in atrocities such as 9/11. This led to a kneejerk "war on terrorism" by invading Iraq and Afghanistan against the will of the people Now they are interfering in Libya again against our will, even as our armed forces are depleted and we are as a nation in debt.
The government tries to spin its actions as humanitarian but a look at where they take place shows that these "humanitarian" actions are very selective. No action in Syria, Bahrein or Ivory Coast, or in the past Darfur or Rwanda. Why the difference? NO IT IS NOT OIL. We could do as China does and keep out of these conflicts and buy the resources. IT IS ALL ABOUT MONEY, the money controlled by the elite of this country, the politicians and their friends in the City.
No Mr Cameron, we the people do not agree with your warlike actions and your interference in other's business for your own globalist financial agenda and
WE ARE NOT TAKING THE BLAME.
YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS IN THE CITY CAUSED MUCH OF THE TROUBLE.
WE, THE POOR BLOODY INFANTRY PAID AND DIED FOR YOUR MISTAKES AND GREED.
And you allow people who you have caused to hate us almost free entry into our country to cause dissent and mayhem here while prosecuting and vilifying those who object.
It is obvious you and your Common Purpose Globalist friends are intent on destroying our country FOR YOUR OWN ENDS.
THAT IS YOUR ULTIMATE AGENDA.
OUR JOB IS TO PREVENT IT BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE.
Ashley Mote deconstructs the UK Census – brilliant and chilling
Ashley Mote deconstructs the UK Census – brilliant and chilling
When the US Census asked me my ethnicity, I answered, American. On reflection, it would have been better not to answer the Census at all.
I’m sure my co-editor agrees with me that Ashley Mote’s deconstruction of the UK Census is brilliant and chilling -
12 March 2011
Problem with the 2011 UK Census?
In view of widespread and understandable concerns about the intrusive nature of the census we in the UK are asked to complete on 27 March, may I offer a few observations and a few relevant facts.
What Does the Law Demand?
Census Act 1920
SCHEDULE
Matters in respect of which particulars may be required
1 Names, sex, age.
2 Occupation, profession, trade or employment.
3 Nationality, birthplace, race, language.
4 Place of abode and character of dwelling.
5 Condition as to marriage, relation to head of family, issue born in marriage.
6 Any other matters with respect to which it is desirable to obtain statistical information with a view to ascertaining the social or civil condition of the population.
How Safe is Our Information?
Unlike in Northern Ireland and Scotland, the absolute confidentiality of personal information is no longer guaranteed by law in England and Wales. This was abolished by Nu-Labour in the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007, section 39.
Census data collected in England will be treated as ‘restricted’, not ‘confidential’. Our forms will be processed by some 1300 temporary employees at an 800,000 square foot warehouse in Manchester. The Coalition government has provided no convincing assurances about the vetting of these temporary staff, nor the security being imposed on them and the data they handle, neither during nor after the process.
Data gathering in 2011 has been contracted to a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin – the US arms conglomerate. Eighty percent of LM’s work is for the US defence department. It assists more than two dozen American government agencies and is involved in surveillance and data processing for the CIA and FBI. It has provided private-contract interrogators to the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and Guantánamo Bay in Cuba.
All US-based companies are subject to the Patriot Act, which allows the US government to have access to any data in the company’s possession. In other words, the US government will have legal access to detailed and highly personal data on the UK’s entire population.
The Census website boldly states, without qualification, that “completing the census online is straightforward, convenient and secure”. Each census form has a 20-digit “personal” internet access code. Describing it as “personal” when it is addressed to “The Occupier”, and accessible to anyone who happens to see the form lying around, is absurdly irresponsible.
How could bureaucrats with a long history of failing to keep data secure contemplate any such thing? If amateur hackers can break into the Pentagon’s computers, there can be no credible guarantee that the British government could guarantee better security – especially given their appalling track-record.
The losses of personal data by the British government and its civil servants have been enormous in recent years. Remember the 400 laptops and memory sticks ‘lost’ by the Ministry of Defence? And that was just one incident.
Worse, there have been no government guarantees that criminals will be prevented from gaining access to raw census data. How can it, when all our personal data will be available to the police, the intelligence agencies, immigration authorities, tax inspectors, DWP investigators, foreign governments, the EU, and to private sector and academic ‘approved researchers’?
The Office for National Statistics’ claim that this data will be safe is worthless. Far too often the UK government has failed to secure and protect personal records in digital format. We have no credible reason to believe them this time.
Intrusive Role of the European Union
In 2008 the European Parliament approved a Census Regulation requiring the harmonization of outputs from member states’ censuses of population and housing. It is now law in the UK. The regulation requires that information collected in the UK is passed to Eurostat, the EU’s statistics institution, which was totally discredited for fraud and corruption amongst its own senior staff in a major scandal over many years.
. . .Statewatch, the civil liberties body that monitors the EU, has discovered that Brussels wants law enforcement agencies in member countries to build lists of political activists as part of a ‘systematic data collection’.
Civil servants in the member countries charged with this duty have been told to collate information on what the EU chooses to call ‘agents of radicalisation’. They have been sent a list of 70 questions to answer about each ‘suspect’. They want to know about family members, psychological traits, religious affiliation, activities, economic status and, significantly, ‘oral comments’ – presumably via phone taps – on political issues. The extent of this EU trawl for potential political opponents was confirmed in The Guardian on 8th June 2010.
No doubt the 2011 census will provide a good starting point.
Invasive Questions and Wrong Assumptions
Who is expected to respond? The census is addressed to “the occupier” – singular. Yet there is space for answers relating to six people, and visitors. The preamble makes it plain that “the occupier” is legally liable for the accuracy of answers relating to all the others.
The government ‘justifies’ the need for the census by claiming that, amongst other things, it is required to plan the provision of education, health, transport, policing, housing and so on. Apparently we are expected to believe that these services are today being managed on the basis of the census taken ten years ago. It’s demonstrably ridiculous.
Such services are demand led, and rightly so. The use of census statistics to plan and deliver them is at best highly marginal and rapidly out of date.
Unlike previous censuses, people are expected to state their employer’s name, their main activity, their address, and the full postal address of the location where that individual works. This applies to everyone, whether they work for Tesco or the intelligence services. Even people who are supposedly in a witness protection scheme after giving evidence at a criminal trial must provide this information.
The first question on employment provides nowhere for a retired person to state that fact. The assumption is that he or she should have been looking for work in the previous week, if not actually working. The chance to declare that they are retired comes later. Volunteers who work for nothing have nowhere to say so.
There are far more intrusive questions on ethnic origins than 10 years ago, unsurprising after the torrent of foreign nationals allowed to live here over the last decade. Answers are mandatory. Questions on religion are not. However, despite there being over 390,000 self-declared Jedi recorded in the 2001 census (more than there were Sikhs or Jews) there is no tick box for Jedi.
Even the reasonable voice of Charles Moore, former editor of The Daily Telegraph, complains (12 March) that the intrusive questions on ethnicity will be used by government and others to exploit the race and culture wars which bedevil us. They reinforce divisions.
So, I might add, does the expensive provision of census forms in over 50 other languages. How better to reinforce the divisions in today’s fractured British society? Those of us meeting the cost of such indulgence might reasonably ask foreigners who have chosen to live in the UK to adopt our language, culture and way of life, at least outwardly.
Legal and Constitutional Protection
In 2001 over 1.5 million households failed to complete the census, but only 38 were prosecuted. But that was 10 years ago.
The Human Rights Act and the Data Protection Act provide us with protection against an overbearing state. Well, that’s the theory anyway.
Several other aspects British and international law are also relevant.
Both Magna Carta, 1215, and the Declaration of Rights, 1688, were contracts made directly between the Crown and the people. Both were and still are beyond the powers of parliament. Any repeal of statutes leaves the original contracts untouched. (References: Speaker Betty Boothroyd, Hansard 21 July 1993, and a letter from the House of Lords Archives Office to me in September 2000.)
Magna Carta recognises the rights of subjects of the Crown to hold government to account. This is sometimes described as the right to ‘lawful rebellion’, and was specifically confirmed in the oath sworn by Henry III at his coronation on 28 October 1216.
The Bill of Rights went further. It explicitly forbids the recognition of power over what is now the UK by any “foreign person, prelate, state or potentate”. In other words our joining what was then the Common Market was unlawful, and our membership of the EU remains unlawful. Most certainly passing information to Brussels to assist their governance of the UK is illegal.
Our constitution is fragmented but clear. It provides that the state answers to the people. We, the people, do not answer to the state. There is no such legal entity as a British state.
We are a sovereign people and we elect individuals for a maximum of five years to look after our best interests. And any future parliament has an absolute right to repeal any Acts passed by previous governments. Thus, they answer to us.
Several clauses in the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights defend our right to privacy.
3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
So Where Does That Leave Us?
A census is only possible with the general consent of the population. In some countries this no longer exists. Germany has not taken a full census since that planned for 1983 was postponed until 1987. The Netherlands has not had a census since 1971, following a high level of refusal previously. Both these countries, and Denmark, now use alternative data sources based mostly on housing registers and sample surveys.
The UK government has made no secret of its irritation at having to carry out the 2011 census, which was put in train by Nu-Labour before the election last year. It will cost almost half a billion pounds.
The Coalition has initiated work on data-collection alternatives, so that the 2011 census proves to be the last of its kind.
Meanwhile, what to do?
All the basic information about each of us is in the public domain already. That is – name, address, age, sex and marital status.
If you plan to complete it at all, you might consider. . .
(a) providing the legally specific information required only, and
(b) posting it.
The Royal Mail admits to several million letters a year not reaching their intended destination.
Think on. . .
Thank you, Mr Mote.
RACIST ASIAN PACKS ATTACK LONE BRITISH MALES
WEST MIDLANDS POLICE
WALSALL LOCAL POLICING UNIT
The incident took place between 8-8.20pm Saturday 2 April in Palfrey Park, Dale Street, Walsall.
One of the victims, a 44 year old man, was walking his dogs in the park, when he was assaulted by a group of Asian males. They punched him and then used his own walking stick to hit him on the head, causing a cut.
During the incident, two witnesses came to his rescue, one of them, a 32 year old man, was also struck over the head with the walking stick.He was taken to hospital with head injuries, where his condition is described as stable.
Officers have arrested two men in connection with this incident and they are currently helping with enquiries.
Police from the local neighbourhood team will be carrying out reassurance patrols in the park and surrounding areas.
DI Phil Asquith from Force CID said:"Officers are currently investigating the attacks on both the man walking his dogs and on the man who came to his aid. We are appealing for anyone who was in Palfrey Park on Saturday evening and who may have witnessed the incidents or may have information to contact Force CID at Bloxwich on 0345 113 5000 or call Crimestoppers confidentially on 0800 555 111.
WALSALL LOCAL POLICING UNIT
TWO MEN ATTACKED IN PALFREY OVER THE WEEKEND
4 April 2011
Walsall police are appealing for witnesses following an assault on two men in the early hours of Sunday 3 April in Palfrey.
The men, aged 27 and 29 were walking in Milton Street, when they were attacked by three Asian males.
The 29 year old man suffered cuts and grazes to his head, knees and elbows following the attack. The 27 year old suffered a broken nose and swelling to his head.
Descriptions of the attackers are three Asian males aged in their twenties.
Police have crimed the incident as a racially aggravated assault due to the fact the victims were wearing Indian cricket shirts following the cricket match.
Anyone with information or any witnesses to the incident early Sunday morning, should contact Walsall CID on 0345 113 5000 or call Crimestoppers confidentially on 0800 555 111.Police call for witnesses – Palfrey Park
Walsall police are appealing for witnesses following an attack in Palfrey Park at the weekend, which left one man with serious head injuries.The incident took place between 8-8.20pm Saturday 2 April in Palfrey Park, Dale Street, Walsall.
One of the victims, a 44 year old man, was walking his dogs in the park, when he was assaulted by a group of Asian males. They punched him and then used his own walking stick to hit him on the head, causing a cut.
During the incident, two witnesses came to his rescue, one of them, a 32 year old man, was also struck over the head with the walking stick.He was taken to hospital with head injuries, where his condition is described as stable.
Officers have arrested two men in connection with this incident and they are currently helping with enquiries.
Police from the local neighbourhood team will be carrying out reassurance patrols in the park and surrounding areas.
DI Phil Asquith from Force CID said:"Officers are currently investigating the attacks on both the man walking his dogs and on the man who came to his aid. We are appealing for anyone who was in Palfrey Park on Saturday evening and who may have witnessed the incidents or may have information to contact Force CID at Bloxwich on 0345 113 5000 or call Crimestoppers confidentially on 0800 555 111.
----------------------------
Is it time for the Indigenous Population to create vigilante groups to protect OUR PEOPLE ?
If they are unable to stop such RACIST ATTACKS ON THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH should they start to RETALIATE in kind.
Any ASIAN RACIST ATTACK, which is usually carried out by a gang of COWARDLY ASIANS on LONE INDIGENOUS MALES be they young or old, should be met with RETALIATION ?
We cannot have faith in the LAW or the POLICE to protect us in OUR TOWNS and CITIES.
This is not something I say lightly but we are seeing more and more RACIST ATTACKS by ASIANS on the WHITE INDIGENOUS BRITISH POPULATION.
AN EYE FOR AN EYE ? A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH ?
It is no longer safe for the WHITE INDIGENOUS POPULATION to walk the streets and parks of their home towns with a large ASIAN POPULATION.
THIS NEEDS TO STOP NOW.
If they are unable to stop such RACIST ATTACKS ON THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH should they start to RETALIATE in kind.
Any ASIAN RACIST ATTACK, which is usually carried out by a gang of COWARDLY ASIANS on LONE INDIGENOUS MALES be they young or old, should be met with RETALIATION ?
We cannot have faith in the LAW or the POLICE to protect us in OUR TOWNS and CITIES.
This is not something I say lightly but we are seeing more and more RACIST ATTACKS by ASIANS on the WHITE INDIGENOUS BRITISH POPULATION.
AN EYE FOR AN EYE ? A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH ?
It is no longer safe for the WHITE INDIGENOUS POPULATION to walk the streets and parks of their home towns with a large ASIAN POPULATION.
THIS NEEDS TO STOP NOW.
Tuesday, 5 April 2011
LUNACY
I need you all to lend me a hand here. I THINK I understand the situation, but it keeps sending my mind into 'emergency shutdown' mode because of the weirdness of the entire thing. Let me explain, then maybe you can tell me where I'm going wrong:
1. A bloke in some remote other part of the world (Florida) burns a piece of paper
2.Some other bloke (several, actually) from some other other remote part of the world (Afghanistan) decides to "avenge" this by murdering a woman from some other other part of the world (Norway) and:
3.murdering yet another bloke (beheading) from some other other other remote part of the world (Nepal).
All the murder victims here are strangers to each other, and to the murderers, and to the bloke who burned the piece of paper.
And yet, and yet (and this is the bit that keeps driving me into shutdown mode because I just don't seem to be able to grasp this without risk of losing my sanity) ... IT'S ALL THE FIRST BLOKE'S FAULT FOR BURNING THAT PIECE OF PAPER!!!! BEEP BEEP RING RING RING EMERGENCY SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN.
Can any of you help me make a bit of progress on this? It just seems so batshit insane to me ... where does chopping someone's head off come on the scale of retaliation for the offence of some other bloke - a stranger - harmlessly burning a piece of paper thousands of miles away?
We try and pretend we are dealing with rational human beings ... but we're not are we. They're Mohammedans, and there's nothing rational about people who think it's appropriate to murder strangers without warning over the offence of yet another stranger burning a piece of paper
Oh - and there were a load more murder victims than just the two.
Wonder what the animals would have done if there had been a baby on site? Ah no - ok - Palestinian Mohammedans gave us the answer to that a few weeks back when they murdered a three-month old Jewish baby by cutting her throat so severely that it nearly turned into a beheading.
Morg
.
1. A bloke in some remote other part of the world (Florida) burns a piece of paper
2.Some other bloke (several, actually) from some other other remote part of the world (Afghanistan) decides to "avenge" this by murdering a woman from some other other part of the world (Norway) and:
3.murdering yet another bloke (beheading) from some other other other remote part of the world (Nepal).
All the murder victims here are strangers to each other, and to the murderers, and to the bloke who burned the piece of paper.
And yet, and yet (and this is the bit that keeps driving me into shutdown mode because I just don't seem to be able to grasp this without risk of losing my sanity) ... IT'S ALL THE FIRST BLOKE'S FAULT FOR BURNING THAT PIECE OF PAPER!!!! BEEP BEEP RING RING RING EMERGENCY SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN.
Can any of you help me make a bit of progress on this? It just seems so batshit insane to me ... where does chopping someone's head off come on the scale of retaliation for the offence of some other bloke - a stranger - harmlessly burning a piece of paper thousands of miles away?
We try and pretend we are dealing with rational human beings ... but we're not are we. They're Mohammedans, and there's nothing rational about people who think it's appropriate to murder strangers without warning over the offence of yet another stranger burning a piece of paper
Oh - and there were a load more murder victims than just the two.
Wonder what the animals would have done if there had been a baby on site? Ah no - ok - Palestinian Mohammedans gave us the answer to that a few weeks back when they murdered a three-month old Jewish baby by cutting her throat so severely that it nearly turned into a beheading.
Morg
.
Monday, 4 April 2011
6O MILLION NON-MOSLEMS
I know that not all Muslims are involved in this lunacy. However, they are all going to take the backlash of it. All Muslims will be blamed for the actions of the UAF [old friends of ours] and of the Taliban. All Muslims will become the target, not of the EDL who have very precise aims, but of the ordinary people whipped into a frenzy by the likes of the Daily Mail.
Muslims, listen to a smoker. You are in the process of being denormalised. It's not quite the same approach because smokers, drinkers, fat people and even Christians will not rise up and fight back. We are all being denormalised by gradual steps which we can, mostly, just slide around.
You, Muslims, are different. You shout and scream and threaten death and destruction and you blow things up and you demand 'rights' and you retaliate.
The authorities have a hard time with smokers. Tell us we can't smoke in a pub and we simply stop going to pubs and make alternative arrangements. We don't fight, we slide past the rules. We can hide in plain sight and we can appear and disappear at will. Christians simply don't wear a cross or keep it in their pocket, they don't really need it anyway. The authorities can't fight us if we don't fight them. They especially can't fight us if they can't find us.
Muslims, you have made yourselves easy targets for the denormalisation process. Burning poppies, blowing people up, cutting heads off, marching with demands such as 'free speech go to hell' and 'Sharia law for the UK' and the UAF and the Muslim Parliament that nobody voted for - you are walking straight into another version of the holocaust you pretend didn't happen. You fight, and that means they know what to do with you. They will set the people against you and that boast of 'two million Muslims in the UK'?
There are sixty million non-Muslims right next to you.
So sit back a while and think. You've been useful but they don't need you any more. Your rage is going to get a response and it is, indeed, a response that has been planned and calculated.
But not by you.
Muslims, listen to a smoker. You are in the process of being denormalised. It's not quite the same approach because smokers, drinkers, fat people and even Christians will not rise up and fight back. We are all being denormalised by gradual steps which we can, mostly, just slide around.
You, Muslims, are different. You shout and scream and threaten death and destruction and you blow things up and you demand 'rights' and you retaliate.
The authorities have a hard time with smokers. Tell us we can't smoke in a pub and we simply stop going to pubs and make alternative arrangements. We don't fight, we slide past the rules. We can hide in plain sight and we can appear and disappear at will. Christians simply don't wear a cross or keep it in their pocket, they don't really need it anyway. The authorities can't fight us if we don't fight them. They especially can't fight us if they can't find us.
Muslims, you have made yourselves easy targets for the denormalisation process. Burning poppies, blowing people up, cutting heads off, marching with demands such as 'free speech go to hell' and 'Sharia law for the UK' and the UAF and the Muslim Parliament that nobody voted for - you are walking straight into another version of the holocaust you pretend didn't happen. You fight, and that means they know what to do with you. They will set the people against you and that boast of 'two million Muslims in the UK'?
There are sixty million non-Muslims right next to you.
So sit back a while and think. You've been useful but they don't need you any more. Your rage is going to get a response and it is, indeed, a response that has been planned and calculated.
But not by you.
Sunday, 3 April 2011
Multiculturalists could learn a lot from Ivory Coast
Multiculturalists could learn a lot from Ivory Coast
What lessons can the leftist multiculturalists take from this? Well, two actually. One, that opposition to multiculturalism has absolutely nothing to do with longings for empire or a sense of white superiority. Ivory Coast has never had an empire, nor are white supremacists that popular there. But they do see the problem with immigration; its economic and cultural impact - the loss of jobs and the sense of radical social change - has left them with little option but to turn to extremism. Does that sound familiar? Two, that immigrant communities do not ‘mingle’ with the native population and share ideas and values. They are attracted to areas already inhabited by the familiar, those of the same ethnic or cultural group. Now, I’m not seriously suggesting that multiculturalism in the UK will cause a war any time in the foreseeable future. What I am saying is that there are useful comparisons to be made, that the Ivory Coast represents the worst possible outcome of the failure of multiculturalism, and that those who continue to stress the importance of multicultural theory take a look at how their noble ideas turn out in practice. You cannot put unlimited numbers of people of different allegiances into an area with limited resources and expect them to share.
http://europeandisunion.blogspot.com/2011/04/multiculturalists-could-learn-lot-from.html?showComment=1301861225316#c2510495878030549599
http://europeandisunion.blogspot.com/2011/04/multiculturalists-could-learn-lot-from.html?showComment=1301861225316#c2510495878030549599
Saturday, 2 April 2011
WHO ARE WE?
Rick Bradford
Post subject: Re: We need a new approach
Most politicians over the last 40 years having been doing everything they can to destroy the 'British national identity' in their attempt to create New Post-Modern Person.
An 'identity', by definition, carries with it 'values' which the overwhelming cult of moral relativism does not allow for.
Quote:
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
http://umbrellog.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1009071&start=15
Work your way back to the beginning. Plenty of food for thought.
Morg
.
Post subject: Re: We need a new approach
Most politicians over the last 40 years having been doing everything they can to destroy the 'British national identity' in their attempt to create New Post-Modern Person.
An 'identity', by definition, carries with it 'values' which the overwhelming cult of moral relativism does not allow for.
Quote:
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
http://umbrellog.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1009071&start=15
Work your way back to the beginning. Plenty of food for thought.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)