WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SUMMER HOLIDAY - ALLAH AKBAR

Asian youths sent on £2,000 jaunt to Blackpool to avoid clashes at Right-wing march jailed for car park fight

• Five teenagers found guilty for their part in brawl that left a man unconscious

Wasim Telhat has been given a community supervision order for his part in the fight

A group of Asian youths taken on a day-trip to Blackpool to avoid becoming embroiled violence at an EDL march ended up knocking a man unconscious in a car park brawl.

Five teenagers have been found guilty of their part in the incident in which a father-of-two was punched to the ground.

The five were part of a group of youths who were taken to on the trip on July 17 last year, the day of an English Defence League march in Dudley in the West Midlands.

The day-trip cost the public purse £2,113 and saw the group from the Tipton and Oldbury areas of the West Midands accompanied by a police officer and officials from the council.

The clash happened after the youths got off their coach and began chanting racist comments at Derek Brownhill, who had just got off a coach parked nearby.

The chants were heard by Mr Brownhill's pregnant partner and two young daughters, as well as a group of elderly people, the court was told

In the ensuing confrontation Mr Brownhill was punched and hit with such force by Riad Hussain, 19, that both feet left the ground.

Wolverhampton Crown Court was told the blows left unconscious and with bruising and swelling to his face and head.

The group then punched Hussain, from Oldbury, in the face to give him a bruise so they could try to claim that his actions were in self defence.

Prosecutor David Swinnerton told the court that the teenagers - Hussain, Wasim Telhat, 18, Raja Rashid, 18, and two 17-year-olds - were part of a large group of Asian youths taken to Blackpool by coach on July 17 last year to avoid potential trouble.

At the time of the violence, two of the gang were on bail for a hammer attack in Tipton, West Midlands, that took place three months before the Blackpool incident.

Pleasure: The group of youths were taken to Blackpool to avoid potential clashes at an EDL rally in the West Midlands

Pain: The authorities were keen to avoid scenes such as this one between demonstrators and police

On Tuesday Rashid was jailed for a total of 21 months and one 17-year-old for a total of 16 months for their part in the assault. Hussain was jailed for ten months.

Telhat was given a community supervision order and 50 hours of unpaid work while another 17-year-old received a 12-month rehabilitation order.

Judge Amjad Nawaz told them: 'There is nothing more disturbing than to have to sentence a dock full of young people just past their childhood years having engaged in offences of such severity that custodial sentences are inevitable.'

Mr Swinnerton said the trip was organised by Sandwell Borough Council 'for the purpose of distracting them from anti-social behaviour on the day of the EDL march in Dudley'.

The council said the trip to Blackpool had been organised with the support of police to help reduce tensions and deter teenagers who may have been at risk of getting involved in demonstrations in Dudley on the day.

The cost of the trip was met by the Government's Youth Justice Board.

'I would not say the trip had failed. Its purpose was to keep them away from the march.
'If they got involved in something else in Blackpool, that's another matter.'

Derrick Campbell,
Race Equality Sandwell

It said although it had no plans to do anything similar in the future, it would have to consider removing young people from situations in an attempt to prevent them from getting into trouble.

Councillor Derek Rowley, Sandwell Council's cabinet member for safer neighbourhoods, said: 'Clearly, this was a very unfortunate incident which we totally condemn.

'We have a duty to foster good community relations and we will continue to work with local people and all our partner organisations towards that aim.'

Derrick Campbell, boss of Race Equality Sandwell, told the Sun: 'I would not say the trip had failed. Its purpose was to keep them away from the march.

'If they got involved in something else in Blackpool, that's another matter.'

In total, 19 youngsters went on the trip. Eight were aged 16 or over and 11 were under 16.

In addition, there were five youth workers and one police officer, who went on a voluntary basis.

Chief Superintendent Mark Robinson, commander for Sandwell Police, said: 'A decision was taken by Safer Sandwell Partnership to take a number of youths away from the area, who had been identified as having the potential to get involved in any disorder that could occur as a result of the demonstrations.

'Whilst we feel that the decision to try and prevent any potential violence among local youths was the right one, clearly the events that followed were hugely disappointing'"

Lyrics - ROY HARPER
Song - ROY HARPER
SINGER ROY HARPIE

It seems someone does not appreciate the earlier post of the Origional version of The Black Cloud Of Islam by Roy Harper, so I hope Roy Harpie's version will do.

AN ALIEN INVASION

I read that HIV cases are increasing in Wigan and the majority of infected people are from Sub Saharan Africa. Any increase in infectious diseases is a worry but one must ask the question why there are so many people from Africa in Wigan.

We like most mining towns have not been plagued by being diversified for the simple reason that mining is (or was while it existed) hard graft, and not many immigrants would take this employment.

They in the past took up what was formerly womens work in the mills, more suitable to Asians with their smaller stature and weaker physique. Now however it seems we have these Africans here. My question is why are they here? We have local unemployment so why do we need these uneducated people here. Yes we've all seen them selling balloons in Wigan but what good do they contribute to our community and town?

Many of them will also have TB as well. There will always be a few naive young white slags who will have sex with them and thus spread the infection into the local population and put the rest of the Wigan population at risk.

We did not invite these people here and I am sure they did not come for a job so why do the authorities allow or invite them here? Where do they live and who pays for their living costs? Us the taxpayers who are now being increasingly denied the benefits we have paid for in our taxes "because of the cuts" It is the height of irresponsibility and against the wishes of the vast majority of local people.



Wigan and Leigh were built by the sweat of our forebears in the mines, mills and enginering works. Admittedly parts of our environment have suffered as a result as the profits from those efforts were creamed off by the bosses and taken down South. BUT WHAT IS LEFT IS OURS and we don't want it to be further decayed. It was handed down to us and we like it.

We like our towns and communities peopled with folks like us with whom we feel comfortable. But now we have been stealthily infiltrated by these disease carrying aliens from another continent with whom we have nothing in common. And now we have to pay for the treatment of their promiscuity caused disease .


Not only that the health of our children is put at risk. Is this what our people slaved for and fought to preserve? The answer to the problem?(and the cuts) Send these unwelcome people back home, release their houses for Wiganers and us from paying for their medical care and benefits and we could have all the services WE have paid for.

Those who have visited this plague on us have a lot to answer for and hopefully in the goodness of time they will get their just deserts.

Contrary to what some councillors on Wigan Metro think, we do not welcome them, indeed their presence in our town is an affront to us. WIGAN BELONGS TO WIGANERS Link: No testing (in Wigan) despite hiv case rise:

PRO-HOMOSEXUAL LESSONS TO BE TAUGHT TO 4yr OLDS

Gay messages built into school maths lessons for children as young as FOUR

Young children are to be taught about homosexuality in their maths, geography, science and English lessons, it has emerged.

As part of a Government-backed drive to ‘celebrate the gay community’, maths problems could be introduced that involve gay characters.

In geography classes, students will be asked why homosexuals move from the countryside to cities – and words such as ‘outing’ and ‘pride’, will be used in language classes.

The lesson plans are designed to raise awareness about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual issues and, in theory, could be used for children as young as four.

They will also mean youngsters are exposed to images of same-sex couples and books such as And Tango Makes Three, which tells the story of two male penguins raising a chick, which was inspired by events at New York’s Central Park Zoo.

Meanwhile, statistics students may use census data on the number of homosexuals in England.

However critics warn that the drive is an unnecessary use of resources and distracts attention from learning, as British schools tumble down international league tables in maths, English and science. Although the lesson plans are not compulsory, they are backed by the Department for Education and will be available for schools to download from the Schools Out website.

Sue Sanders, from Schools Out, said: ‘All we are attempting to do is remind teachers that LGBT people are part of the population and you can include them in most of your lessons when you are thinking inclusively.’

David Watkins, a teacher who is involved in the scheme, said: ‘When you have a maths problem, why does it have to involve a straight family or a boyfriend and girlfriend? Why not two boys or two girls?

‘It’s not about teaching about gay sex, it is about exposing children to the idea that there are other types of people out there,’ he added.

However, Craig Whittaker, who is a Conservative MP and a member of the education select committee, said: ‘We are too far down the national comparative league tables in core subjects. Teachers should concentrate on those again.

Same sex: Geography lessons will explain why homosexuals move to cities and language classes will teach gay vocabulary (picture posed by models)

‘This is not about being homophobic, because there are other schemes around the education which support the LGBT agenda.’

John O’Connell, of campaign group the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘Parents will wonder if this is a right use of funds and time, particularly when we keep hearing how tight budgets are.’

The plans are funded by a £35,000 grant from education quango the Training And Development Agency For Schools. They will be launched in February at the start of LGBT History Month.

A Department for Education spokesman added: ‘These are optional teaching materials.

‘It is for head and teacher to choose the most appropriate teaching resources to help promote equality and tolerance.’

LGBT History Month started in 2005 and has previously focused more on raising awareness of prominent figures said to be homosexual.

A list on its website includes Hadrian the Roman emperor and Michaelangelo the Renaissance painter.

------------------------------------------------

Soon Paedophilia will be taught to our Children as a way of introducing them to Sexual Deviants, Child Molesters and Sexual Perverts.

As can be seen in Wigan Councils ByoU Project -

The ByoU Project provides specialist provision for young people aged 11-25 years old who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual. It also provides support for young people who are questioning their sexuality.

The Project aims to:

• Build confidence
• Tackle isolation and self esteem
• Build networks and support
• Offer a safe meeting place

Is this part of a Propaganda exercise to brain washing our Children into accepting Queers as part of their lives ?
Why are the powers that be allowing Perversion and Sexual practices, which are not the Norm for 99% of the population, to be taught to Children at the exclusion of a REAL EDUCATION ?

MILITANT QUEERS FORCE THEIR SEXUALTY ON EVERYONE ELSE.
WHY ?

Do you want your Children to be taught that Homosexuality is NORMAL ?
Homosexuality is NOT the NORM. Man and Woman are the Norm.

RADICAL MUSLIMS CALL FOR JIHAD IN THE UK.

Straight from the horses mouth, and I quote from the video -

"WE WANT TO REMOVE THIS IDEA THAT ISLAM IS A RELIGION PEACE."
"ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION OF PEACE"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T7eQyah4qU&feature=player_embedded#at=105

A HIJACKED PROTEST

Although I sympathise with the trades unionists protesting against the cuts to public services I still believe they are necessary and may not be even severe enough. The reason for this initially contradictory stance is that the cuts are being made in the wrong place. Low paid workers such as carers, binmen etc are being cut but the thousands of highly paid non jobs remain. Diversity officers smoking cessation officers etc could be dispensed with. These bureaucrats, box ticking and enforcing petty rules and PC rubbish are costing us dear and in fact cost us twice over, once in their own salaries and the other in the costs their useless activities impose on industry. The police nowadays do not respond to burglary and we know they are unable to act in emergencies because of health and safety legislation resulting in tragic deaths. In the snow last Winter one force advised its officers to stay inside as it was too dangerous to venture out. Health and safety are obviously important but many of the petty rules have no actual bearing on safety and could be dispensed with together with the little Hitlers who enforce them, freeing businesses from costs and lowering taxes. When I was young in our area with the local council we had a library, public toilets and we ran our own water supply and road maintenance, bins etc with most of the council workers being out "on the job" rather than sitting in offices. The officials were also not paid the obscene salaries current today. Similarly our primary school had no secretary nor a phone but still managed results better than are achieved nowadays. Our grammar school had 500 pupils with only one secretary and no teaching assistants and got good results. This overstaffing is rampant all through public services and I believe these cuts could be made WITHOUT HURTING FRONT LINE SERVICES. But then the people in charge of making these economies, the highly paid bureaucrats are not likely to cut their own or their office colleague's jobs so the useful lower paid public servants who we need and are appreciated are cut first. This enables the bosses to make a political point while keeping their cushy non productive jobs. So best of luck to the unions but I doubt whether you can do much good as they are "all in it together" the bosses that is. PS The anarchist mob who attempted to hijack the legitimate political protest and cause senseless vandalism should in my opinion have the book thrown at them. The vast majority of people hate the banks and off shore tax evaders but vandalism in our capital city is not the way to protest and defacing our monuments in Trafalgar Square is unforgivable. If they are right should I go down and break the windows in my local bank or branch of Boots just because I dont like them? Of course not. Yes rebellion can be good and effective but it must be LAWFUL, for anarchy brings chaos and usually the weakest suffer the most

LAST NIGHT'S MEETING

Last night we attended a meeting at our venue in Hindley Green organised not by me but by other patriots in order to discuss our future strategy for nationalism.
The meeting was by invitation only in order that we could have a civilised discusion of the problems we face as a party and country.


It was NOT as has been suggested an anti party meeting but an opportunity to discuss between fellow nationalists ways to further our cause.
However if the party hierarchy had heard about the meeting it would have been "proscribed" ie members would have been forbidden to attend on pain of discipliniary action.
I and my wife have received summonses to attend disciplinary hearings for attending "proscribed" meetings in the past. Of course we have no intention as free people of submitting ourselves to such kangaroo courts which are reminiscent of Stalinist Russia.

The cause of this party turmoil are twofold.

First it is no good denying that recently we have not made the electoral impression we should have done in spite of the shambles caused by the coalition government and their economocally illiterate opposition.
The Front National in France has done so much better than we and we must ask Why?

Secondly in our party too much power rests with the chairman and his sycophantic and undemocratic Advisory Council, and dissent among party members is barely tolerated and searching questions result in the questioner being suspended.

What to do about these problems were the topics for debate last night.
Most, but not all stated that we need a new leader as in spite of all the good work he has done in the past is becoming a drag on our electoral prospects.

The way forward is not at present clear but similar meetings are being held all over the country in an attempt to arrive at a consensus on future action and build contacts between like minded patriots.

Last night we had senior party members from London Kent and Yorkshire as well as from all over South Lancashire and I thank them for making the effort.
It was also good to renew old aquaintances with people we had not met for several years.
It shows their committment to our cause and country.

Our meetings are intended to be constructive and form a basis for a leaner and more effective and democratic nationalist movement.

Lest the above seems a council of despair I have to say that nothing could be further from the truth.
There is an increasing hunger for our point of view, a hunger for a believable party or vehicle in which the will of the ordinary British people can be expressed and persued.
Recently we have not been capitalising on that hunger but there is a rich seam of nationalism waiting to be tapped. It is our job to mine this seam and we are determined not to be found wanting. But now we must set the systems in motion to do it even if it requires a new management, but whatever it takes we will endeavour to do it.

Opponents of nationalism and the British people, do not be deceived by our temporary regrouping.
There will be changes and maybe different personnel at the top but we will emerge rejuvenated and ready to tap into that portion of our people who have been betrayed, have no voice and who are increasingly desparate for true representation.

In Tunisia, Egypt, Libya etc it seemed things would never change as democracy was as here suppressed but as the last weeks have shown matters can change quickly when the people are given their voice.

It is our job to provide that voice AND THAT WE WILL DO.

A STATEMENT FROM ANDREW BRONS

23rd March 2011: The Unacknowledged Complementarity That Is Destroying The British National Party

I was going to use the term ‘Unholy Alliance’ but it would have been inaccurate for two reasons:

1. both sides see their own virtue to be as untarnished as the villainy of their opponents is unalloyed.

2. to call the two sides ‘an alliance’ would be to forget that they have a hatred for the other side that they have (unfortunately) never held for our real enemies.

Nevertheless, each responds to the other’s ratcheting-up of the conflict in a manner that could easily have been choreographed and scripted. Indeed the movements and language of one side seem to come from a script that was written in 1986.

We have moved on from attack websites to what each side sees as a final confrontation. Eddy Butler or his allies are holding a series of regional meetings, to which discontented BNP members and ex-members are invited and at which their version of the ‘unvarnished truth’ about Nick Griffin and his cronies is told. People attending these meetings are filmed by the Party’s ‘security’ that sees its role as watching the Party’s members (at which it excels) rather than protecting the Party from its external enemies, at which it is less adept. The filmed members are then suspended from membership or at least some of them are – no nonsense here about the Rule of Law.

It is probable that those who take the decisions within the leadership see their suspensions as a ‘surgical strike’ at the ‘real troublemakers’. However, they do not realise that the suspension of (say) ten key popular people leads to the disaffection of perhaps two or three hundred others – most of them activists.

The suspensions in Yorkshire (the scene of the first Butler meeting) has deprived Yorkshire of its activists, apart from those connected with ‘the security’. The replication of these events in all of the Party’s other regions will see the disaffection of most of the Party’s activists throughout the country.

In 1986 a faction that held a knife edge majority on the National Front’s National Directorate used its majority to suspend and then expel the minority for the heinous offence of voting the wrong way at a Directorate meeting. They continued with their disciplinary ‘blitzkrieg’ until they had expelled or alienated nearly all the Party’s activists. The leadership of the ‘official party’ became an isolated and ignored rump. The opposition then became the leadership of a successor National Front. The ‘rump’ disappeared in a series of easily forgotten splinters.

The person who was the architect of using the disciplinary machinery as a weapon of mass destruction in 1986 re-emerged in the middle of 2010 to become a favoured adviser of our Chairman. He is rightly admired as a no-nonsense man who does not waste valuable time learning from his own mistakes.

However, before the Eddy Butler faction cheers too loudly and precipitately, there are important differences. The Political Parties, Elections & Referendums Act 2000 provides party leaderships, however small and isolated they might be (or are imagined to be), with a monopoly over the use of the Party name. Furthermore, the opposition in 1986 was a cohesive party in waiting with its own magazine and activity programme.

The Eddy Butler programme is entirely negative propaganda about the BNP leadership and has the effect of leaving people exposed to it dispirited and alienated from political activity. Some left the Party to form a micro party and some others plan to seek membership of establishment safety valve parties that will do their reputations immense and undeserved damage in the eyes of serious nationalists.

Most just hope that relentless pressure will somehow lead to Nick Griffin’s resignation. How this will be achieved is not explained. There seems to be no serious attempt to keep in contact with the disaffected who leave politics in disgust. They will probably be lost to Nationalism for ever.

There is a question about whether attending a meeting disapproved of by the leadership of a party should be a disciplinary offence. Would it be a disciplinary offence in other parties? Does it tell us anything about a party leadership that sees disapproved meeting attendance as a disciplinary offence? Would such people, when entrusted with real political power, see disapproved meeting attendance as a criminal offence?

Furthermore, if all dissent is seen as treason, any dissenters become treasonable from necessity.

It would appear that we have a leadership that believes in keeping Nick Griffin as Chairman at any price in terms of lost membership and activists. It is better to have a small party with all of the membership besotted with the present leader than a larger party with a significant number of members who view him with scepticism or hostility. Most parties have significant proportions of their membership who are definitely out of love with their leaders. To want a 100% besotted membership is to want a small and very exclusive party.

The Opposition, on the other hand, wants to get rid of Nick Griffin as Chairman at any price in terms of lost membership and activists. However, it does not have a strategy for achieving its aim.

What is my position?

The autocratic constitution was, to a large extent, inherited by Nick Griffin from his predecessor, John Tyndall. John Tyndall was not one of nature’s autocrats, despite his earlier political leanings. I worked with him easily for six years on the democratically-elected National Directorate of the National Front. However, he left the NF (unwisely in my view) because he had been outvoted on the National Directorate and (unwisely in my view) invented a constitution for his new party (the BNP) that would prevent his being ever outvoted again.

I believe that that constitution corrupts leaders in the manner of a malevolent ring of power. It endows leaders with powers that it would be impossible for leaders to wield personally. They, therefore, pass those powers onto ostensibly sycophantic but, in reality, power-hungry advisers and stand-ins. It turns a leadership cult fantasy into a leader-led-by-the-nose reality. I believe that the heart of the problem is the autocratic constitution. If the Chairman were to share power with an elected executive, the other problems would solve themselves.

Our Chairman called for the Annual Conference in December to consider various proposals for constitutional reform. It opted for a proposal from Arthur Kemp, which was supported by our Chairman. This proposal involved the Chairman sharing power with an indirectly elected Executive comprising, mainly, regional organisers elected by branch organisers. The Annual Conference called for an EGM to consider this proposal but there has been an unaccountable delay in calling the EGM or even referring to it. It is rumoured that our Chairman has been overruled by his closest advisers, who have the final say on such matters. At the Annual Conference, the current Elections Officer opposed the idea of an elected Executive. His objection was put to the vote and his objection was defeated. However, it would appear that he can also overrule the Annual Conference.

I would like to see:

1. constitutional reform as agreed by the Annual Conference

2. an amnesty for those suspended and expelled during ‘the troubles’.

3. complete financial transparency for the future with the Executive being able to examine all future transactions but a line drawn under past transactions and undoubted mismanagement.

4. an end to all damaging websites and blogs with no more dirty linen being washed in public.

Is there any prospect of a truce being agreed along these lines? It would require statesmanship, restraint, humility and, above all, a decision to put the interests of the Party above private and petty concerns.

If there is no truce, the Party will come to an ignominious end before the end of this year. If it were not then to be followed by a credible successor, the British Nation would also come to an end. There would be no second chance to save it.

Andrew Brons

THE TANKIE GAME

If I was a tankie, I'd be selling about now and buying into infantry options.

Morg
.

EHRC Must Pay British National Party’s Court Costs in Full

EHRC Must Pay British National Party’s Court Costs in Full

Nick Griffin has welcomed the ruling that the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) must pay the British National Party’s court costs in full as a “victory for freedom”.

“It is a massive victory for the British National Party and freedom and a crushing blow for the Equality and Human Rights Commission and Trevor Phillips' PC bullies,” he said.

Mr Griffin’s comments follow the High Court judgement ruling that the EHRC must pay all the costs incurred by him, Simon Darby and Tanya Lumby during their brave defence against the EHRC’s attempts to seize the Party's assets and throw the defendants into prison.

The ruling of Lord Justice Moore-Bick and Mr Justice Ramsey is a further crushing defeat for the Commission and a personal humiliation for Trevor Phillips and Simon Woolley, who at the start of proceedings boasted on TV that they were going to close the British National Party down.

"Thanks to the staunch generosity of so many of our members and supporters and the magnificent efforts of our legal team, their attack on democracy and freedom failed utterly," said Mr Griffin.

"The British National Party is still very much alive and kicking. We've built up a legal team which can go head to head with the most powerful opponents and beat them."

On being told that EHRC would be forced to pay its costs in full, Simon Darby said, "I told them they would never beat me or the British National Party, but they simply wouldn't listen. Now these people are going to pay the price for persecuting Nationalists. The question has to be asked as to whether this discredited quango will survive the next round of government cuts."

Exactly how much the EHRC will have to pay must now be assessed in a long and complicated procedure that will take some months. When we get our money back, it will make a healthy contribution to our war chest for next year's Assembly election in London, where the EHRC is/was based.

From the BNP main website

MONEY FOR WAR WHILST BRITISH FAMILIES STARVE

THE desperate plight of children in Britain being forced to rely on food parcels to survive is today revealed by the Sunday Express.

Government cutbacks, rising unemployment and soaring food prices are forcing a growing number of families to miss meals, eat badly or go hungry. In one heartbreaking case a 10-year-old boy was arrested for stealing food to feed his two younger ­sisters.

While some children are short of food, far more are severely deprived of essential nutrients because they are relying on cheap junk food.

Nutrition expert Professor Philip James said: “The rate of malnutrition is reaching astonishing levels. Children are being denied fresh foods because families cannot afford to buy them.

“On their poor diets, by early adolescence these malnourished youngsters will be affected by premature diabetes and early signs of underlying heart disease.

“The bone health of these youngsters is under threat and doctors are seeing increasing cases of rickets.”

On Friday the Sunday Express joined volunteers offering food packages to families in some of the most deprived parts of the country.

Food Bank outlets across Britain offer a lifeline for many, with some of the parcels being handed out originally intended for the poor of Romania and Bulgaria.

Food Bank manager Marla Naiker said: “We have people who will walk miles to pick up a parcel. They are desperate.”

Our special report follows the publication of a study last week which revealed England has higher child poverty rates than other developed European countries. Seven of the top 10 most deprived areas are in London.

UK NEWS

UK BEGINS TO STARVE

A 10-year-old boy was arrested for stealing food to feed his younger ­sisters (picture posed by mode

Sunday March 20,2011

THE desperate plight of children in Britain being forced to rely on food parcels to survive is today revealed by the Sunday Express.

Government cutbacks, rising unemployment and soaring food prices are forcing a growing number of families to miss meals, eat badly or go hungry. In one heartbreaking case a 10-year-old boy was arrested for stealing food to feed his two younger ­sisters.

While some children are short of food, far more are severely deprived of essential nutrients because they are relying on cheap junk food.

Nutrition expert Professor Philip James said: “The rate of malnutrition is reaching astonishing levels. Children are being denied fresh foods because families cannot afford to buy them.

“On their poor diets, by early adolescence these malnourished youngsters will be affected by premature diabetes and early signs of underlying heart disease.

“The bone health of these youngsters is under threat and doctors are seeing increasing cases of rickets.”

The rate of malnutrition is reaching astonishing levels

Nutrition expert Professor Philip James

On Friday the Sunday Express joined volunteers offering food packages to families in some of the most deprived parts of the country.

Food Bank outlets across Britain offer a lifeline for many, with some of the parcels being handed out originally intended for the poor of Romania and Bulgaria.

Food Bank manager Marla Naiker said: “We have people who will walk miles to pick up a parcel. They are desperate.”

Our special report follows the publication of a study last week which revealed England has higher child poverty rates than other developed European countries. Seven of the top 10 most deprived areas are in London.

One mother from Tower Hamlets in east London was recently given money by the charity School Home Support as she had no money to feed her six-year-old son. Judith Sabah, who helps run the charity, said: “We gave £150 – otherwise the child would have had nothing to eat.”

Last month a 10-year-old boy was arrested for stealing food in Newton Heath, Manchester. Police discovered he had been forced into crime to get food for his sisters aged three and five.

Our inquiries found many of the parents who qualified for food rations had been forced to skip meals. Jacqueline Robinson, 40, a mother of four from Cardiff, said: “I’m struggling now. I’m robbing Peter to pay Paul with these increases that are going to happen, and I’m really scared.”

Shirley Hodkinson, 32, from Manchester, often goes without meals to make sure her four children, aged 14, 10, eight and seven, have something to eat. She said: “I break down regularly thinking how I’m going to manage.”

In some parts of Tower Hamlets almost 60 per cent of children are living in households surviving on less than £11 a day per family member, according to the Campaign to End Child Poverty.

Manchester, Islington and Birmingham are close behind, with almost half of youngsters classified as deprived.

Professor James expressed concern at further cutbacks in the nation’s poorest areas.

The former Government adviser on nutrition said: “How will places like these cope where the Government is making some of the biggest cuts to local authority budgets and it is predicted food prices will rise further?

“The Prime Minister said he would protect society’s most vulnerable. This is exactly the opposite of protection.”

The lack of sustenance has led to a rise in health problems previously linked with Victorian Britain. More than 20 cases of rickets are diagnosed every year in Newcastle alone. Anaemia and skin disorders associated with a lack of nutrients are also rising.

The Institute of Fiscal Studies warns that absolute child poverty is set to rise from 2013.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/235599/UK-begins-to-starve

The start of THIRD WORLD conditions in Britain.
Start returning ALL IMMIGRANTS given a BRITISH PASSPORT since 1997-present, if they have children and wives here they can go with their husbands back to the places they love so well and can live a wholly Islamic lifestyle without forever complaining about Western values.
Though Western Values are an absolute disgrace, how else can BRITISH PEOPLE STARVING be allowed.
We DO NOT GIVE FOOD PARCELS TO IMMIGRANTS - WE GIVE THEM CASH ££££.
NOT ONE INDIGENOUS BRITON SHOULD STARVE WHILST THERE ARE IMMIGRANTS LIVING IN LUXERY PAID FOR BY US.

BRITONS LOOK AFTER YOUR OWN - THE IMMIGRANTS WON'T LOOK AFTER US NOR THE LIB/LAB/CON.

Send them back and lets get our UNEMPLOYED YOUTH into the jobs that will becaome available after we return the HEATHENOUS TIDE OF ISLAM and ALL OTHER THIRD WORLD SCROUNGERS who suckle at the teat of BRITTANIA and spit hatred at OUR SERVICEMEN and EX-SERVICEMEN, GROOM and RAPE OUR CHILDREN, supply OUR CHILDREN with CLASS A DRUGS, MUSLIM HATE GANGS LOOKING FOR AND BEATING LONE WHITE MALES, IMMIGRANTS ROBBING and KILLING OUR PENSIONERS in their HOMES and CARE HOMES, OUR CHILDREN PUT LAST IN EDUCATION, MASSIVE INDIGENOUS YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT whilst 3/4 of ALL JOBS have gone to IMMIGRANTS.

Our Elderly die in the Winter through "FUEL POVERTY", yet we can find cash for Wars.
Our Children are STARVING, yet we can find cash for Wars.
Our Soldiers are spat on by Islamic Terrorists whilst on parade on the streets of Britain with impunity, yet we can find cash for Wars.
Our Youth are UNEMPLOYED whilst 3.4 of ALL NEW JOBS go to IMMIGRANTS, so we throw them on the dole, yet we can find cash for Wars.
We employ many m,any immigrant Drs, many who can't speak or read English, Our Children are placed into DEBT, approx £30.000 at the end of their Degree courses, immigrants don't have to pay, when they go to University,yet we can find cash for Wars.

We can make this country GREAT again, We can make it safe for OUR PENSIONERS to be abale to walk the streets alone in the dark, knowing that they are SAFE. A Country SAFE for OUR CHILDREN to PLAY IN, a Country which employs it's INDIGENOUS POPULATION FIRST and evryone else whow ants to live here must understand that they will be given NO PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT WHATSOEVER.
We cannot do it overnight but it can be done.
The question is WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO to help bring back OUR GREATNESS ?

You CANNOT bring GREATNESS back to BRITAIN by voting for the Lib/Lab/Con party.
All that has done is RUINED US and OUR ONCE BEAUTIFUL HOMOGENOUS SAFE COMMUNITY CENTRED COUNTRY.

WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK AND WE WILL TAKE IT BACK.

WHY, EXACTLY, ARE WE ATTACKING LIBYA?

Libya – the pariah in the EU’s Mediterranean Union plans

Posted on March 20, 2011 by Not Applicable

So the UK, a nation totally broke and in debt to the rest of the world in excess of £2 trillion, a nation that is running down its military capabilities, closing airbases, scrapping large swathes of its historic Royal Navy, and handing troops their P45′s whilst they are fighting in Afghanistan, has decided to embark on yet another war. We have to look behind the rhetoric and sound byte headlines and ask Why?
Following hard on the heels of Cameron doing a quick tour of the Middle East with his band of followers, a high powered gaggle of arms dealers, in the wake of unrest across the region from ‘democracy’ seekers, this military action is a methodology in action..
And it is that which set my mind a thinking. On the one hand the historical view that war always helps to raise a country out of recession, and on the other hand a need to understand where this sudden upsurge of interest for democracy has suddenly appeared from in the Arab states, something that has been puzzling me since I started closely following the events in Egypt.
I have arrived at the conclusion that the start of military action over Libya has nothing to do with the Cameron drafted UN mandate (we all know how the double speak of politics works, and I am old enough and cynical enough never to take the headline at face value), it has nothing to do with protecting the people from a wicked despot (we have heard that excuse before as well), but it does have everything to do with the fact that Libya is not part of any of the organisations listed below, and if the EU is to export its kind of Communitarian ‘civil society’, its faux democracy, then those not in the club have to go, and it will also go a long way to reinforce the beginning of an EU military structure in action.
I believe that this action has long been in the planning, but required the right trigger mechanisms to play out before it could be put into action, i.e. Problem/Reaction/Solution. The removal of Mubarak was a consession, and allowing Saudi Arabia to ‘secure’ Bahrain was another, where a similar state killing spree is going on. The delay in beginning this military action was that until there was a ’20/20 Leader’ in the Libyan rebel camp the US would not endorse it. I believe seeking out that leader was part of the Hague ‘Diplomatic’ mission which went wrong, with the SBS contingent tasked with setting up the target markers.
It occurred to me that I have written about most of this before, but as isolated items. The massive EU funding running into many billions of euros in most of these states for ‘reforms’ in ‘civil society’ and ‘training’. A substantial amount of that training being provided, run, operated or funded by ‘Common Purpose’ or its South African affiliates, which to me accounts for this sudden urge from ‘the people’ of Arab states for democracy.
Then there is the EU’s planned hegemony into Africa. Its renewed activity in The Union for the Mediterranean, under the Barcelona agreement promoted by…. Sarkozy, and its interest in an otherwise unknown geo-region called Sahel.
Back in October 2010 I wrote about The 3041st session of the Council of the European Union – FOREIGN AFFAIRS – will take place on 25 October 2010 (14.45), in the Conference Centre FIL – 5, Rue Carlo Hemmer, Luxembourg, under the presidency of Ms Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
So lets take a look at what the unelected Ms Ashton will be discussing on behalf of the 500m EU ‘citizens’.
Here is the agenda:
The following items will be discussed at this session:
- Sahel
- Middle East
- Cuba
- Summit preparations
a) EU-US (Lisbon, 20 November 2010)
b) EU-Ukraine (Brussels, 22 November 2010)
c) Union for the Mediterranean (Barcelona, 20-21 November 2010)
- Georgia
- European Neighbourhood Policy

The Sahel is the ecoclimatic and biogeographic zone of transition between the Sahara desert in the North and the Sudanian savannas in the south (the Arabic word, however, means any such transitional zone, e.g. in Algeria). It stretches across the north of the African continent between the Atlantic Ocean and the Red Sea. The Sahel covers parts of the countries of Senegal, Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Algeria, Niger, Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea.

You may recall that this is the area in which the EU opened an immigration centre (Mali) last year to allow a mixed bag of migrants from this region to relocate to the 27 member states of the EU.

However, reading a little deeper, it is also seen by the EU as an area “where a vicious cycle of poverty, political conflict, weak states, drug trafficking, terrorist groups and progressive Islamic radicalisation is increasingly taking hold” according to The European Parliament’s Committees on Security and Defence, Foreign Affairs and Development.
So two questions immediately spring to mind. A) What the hell has this region got to do with the EU, as surely this is covered by their own political regional body, the African Union (the only African state not in the AU is Morocco)
and B) if this area is such a threat to security why is the EU promoting immigration from same.
The second question obviously makes no sense, until you get to the agenda item marked Union for the Mediterranean (Barcelona, 20-21 November 2010). Its about expanding the EU to take in not just those states who have indicated an interest, i.e. Iceland, Turkey, Israel etc, but also those states around the Mediterranean and down into the sub-sahara region whether they want EU interference or not.
So lets look at the Union for the Mediterranean. Firstly here is the official EU take on EuroMed from the EEAS (the EU Foreign Affairs department run my Ms Ashton). Look innocuous enough, not really enough to raise an eyebrow.
Initially opposed by the EU and some members states as they saw it as nothing more than a move by the French to reestablish its colonial days in North Africa, it has this year taken on a new life.

It resurrected The Euro-Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly, and the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly which consists of parliamentarians appointed by:
* the national parliaments of the EU Member States;
* the national parliaments of the ten Mediterranean partners (Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey)
* the European Parliament.
The EMPA consists of a maximum of 240 Members, of which 120 are Europeans (75 from the EU national parliaments and 45 from the EP) and 120 are from the NPs of the EU’s Mediterranean partner countries, so as to guarantee North-South parity.
The Assembly’s inaugural meeting took place in Barcelona on 21 January 2010.
The Assembly provides a forum within the Union for the Mediterranean, to bring together members of the EU’s Committee of the Regions and their counterparts from the Mediterranean partner countries, with the aim of strengthening cooperation between local and regional authorities around the Mediterranean.
And lets not forget at this stage people, that every meeting, conference, plenary, dinner, event, report, payment, grant or award is paid for by you the taxpayer, whether that money is channel via Westminster or Brussels.
It appears that the EU is playing a dangerous game of hegemony, encroaching on the political zone currently overseen by the AU, (which you can see by its political bodies is almost identical to the EU), and capitalising on the splits within that organisation, in search of what.
One thing that immediately springs to mind is Oil and Gas, and the EU seems prepared to embark on its own form of the War on Terror, whether real or perceived, using taxpayers money to bribe, cajole or threaten these states in order to acquire the rights to their mineral wealth.
Bring under the EU umbrella those states in the EuroMed zone where political influence is readily exchangeable for cash bribes and projects, and simultaneously extend the security borders of the EU to the Sahel region using the newly formed EU military structures in order to protect those Oil, Gas and mineral deposits.
The European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) has all the clues in its report, (which I understand will be discussed at the Ashton meeting) but lets be clear, EU funding for this is going to cost taxpayers dear, but the real cost, the human cost to sustain this kind of policy will make the use of military intervention inevitable.
It would appear to some that the EU wants to create its own form of Afghanistan in Africa in an attempt to bind Europe together. That may sound cynical, but expect to see in coming years North African immigrants becoming the patsies for this when the body bags start coming home.
Which brings me back to Morocco. Not being a member of the AU has meant that it has had to look elsewhere for its political and social development, and in many instances its security, and there are many who will say that it has already been bought lock stock and barrel by the EU.
But compliance with the overtures from the EU has its benefits for Morocco. Immigration from Morocco to the EU states is already the highest of any African state, and the EU ‘investment’ in Morocco is currently running at many billions of €’s. There is talk of huge infrastructure projects being funded by the EU, least of which is a road bridge between Morocco and Spain as part of the Euro-Med Transport policy.
I have to ask whether this kind of hedgemonistic policy by the EU is really in the long term interests of the UK, which again raises the question is our membership of the EU in our best interests.

 http://pjcjournal.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/libya-the-pariah-in-the-eus-mediterranean-union-plans/

If you follow this link, then please do read the comments ... and follow those links too.

Morg
.

A SONG OF THE WHITE MEN

A Song of the White Men

Now, this is the cup the White Men drink
When they go to right a wrong,
And that is the cup of the old world's hate --
Cruel and strained and strong.
We have drunk that cup -- and a bitter, bitter cup
And tossed the dregs away.
But well for the world when the White Men drink
To the dawn of the White Man's day!

Now, this is the road that the White Men tread
When they go to clean a land --
Iron underfoot and levin overhead
And the deep on either hand.

We have trod that road -- and a wet and windy road
Our chosen star for guide.
Oh, well for the world when the White Men tread
Their highway side by side!

Now, this is the faith that the White Men hold
When they build their homes afar --
"Freedom for ourselves and freedom for our sons
And, failing freedom, War. "
We have proved our faith -- bear witness to our faith,
Dear souls of freemen slain!
Oh, well for the world when the White Men join
To prove their faith again!

Rudyard Kipling

KIPLING - THE STRANGER

KIPLING - THE STRANGER

The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk—
I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock,
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to,
They are used to the lies I tell;
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy or sell.

The Stranger within my gates,
He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control—
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes
They think of the likes of me.

This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf—
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

BNP Passion - 'Hate, Intimidation, Threats, And Lies'

BLOODY HELL - AGREEING WITH GEORGE GALLOWAY?

Morg
.

THE ROYAL NAVY

This is one of the reasons why our country is a laughing stock.

I had the e mail below given to me by a friend, not a BNP member, but it shows the thinking of most people. You may have seen it before.
We should have been able to capitalise on these sentiments but have not done so.
WHY?

WE THE PEOPLE.

The BCG & Lawful Rebellion are the way forward they have exposed that the tools needed to undo what has been perpetrated against the people of this country are already in place i.e. Magna Carta , Bill of Rights, and the Act of Settlement 1700.
Common law in a nut shell cannot be repealed or changed it stands for all time, in their infinite wisdom those that wrote the words of both; these are the tools provided to stop the treason which has been taking place for the last 40 years.
I urge everyone to familiarise yourself with the BCG & Lawful Rebellion, quite a lot to take on but well worth every minute of your time, you will then understand that there is no need for violence or public disorder the ANCIENT RULE of COMMON LAW is with every one of us, to work for the return of self-government that has been sold out by the politicians illegally, and therefore is an act of TREASON against every English indigenous person.
Political elite has for some time manipulated the electoral system to deprive the people of true democratic representation by constructing a party political system that has allowed, indeed encouraged, acts of treason to have been committed.
We, the British People have THE right to govern ourselves. That right has been subjugated as a consequence of acts of treason having been committed by the collective political establishment, aided and abetted by corrupt segments of the judiciary, the police, the Church and the civil service.
Our present Constitutional Settlement, based on common law, cannot be amended or rescinded lawfully. None of the major parties will tell you this, and instead argue that Constitutional reform is necessary and that they have the power to do it.
All the so-called constitutional reform since the beginning of the 20th Century is unlawful. The LibLabCon intends to attempt to legitimise these past reforms, along with the proposed reforms, through that instrument of mob rule - the referendum. The proposed date for the referendum on voting reform is November 2011. We need to begin the process of educating people now, not only to prevent Cameron and Clegg's continuing treason, but so that people understand the principles upon which we will build our alternative governance.

Our national assets have been covertly sold off to private companies on the basis that government is not the best at running our infrastructure. While this is undoubtedly true, we have witnessed treason at work. Successive governments have allowed these private companies to turn our national infrastructure into nothing more than profit centres.
Energy companies, water companies, railway companies spend the minimum they can get away with to maintain the present infrastructure, invest nothing for the future and take everything they can out in profit for shareholders. Once the present infrastructure reaches end of life, as it is in the process of doing, it will be the taxpayer who is expected to finance the building of the next generation of power stations and reservoirs, ready for another 25 years of profit taking.
We would do well to remember that every corporate or commercial asset is ultimately controlled by the banks. And as Banker Baron Nathan Mayer Rothschild said... ”Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not who makes the laws.” Today, we do not know who controls the Bank of England, but we do know that they are private individuals and private banking interests - thus we have no control of our nation's money supply.
One of our first tasks in Lawful Rebellion must be to bring the control of the nation's money supply and national infrastructure back into the hands of the people via Parliament. We must ensure that all associated transactions are fully visible to the light of day, and that any private company tasked with running our national infrastructure suffers financial penalty if profit is put ahead of future investment.
Our present system of government (of Parliament) is the consequence of this ancient and exemplary act of lawful rebellion. Parliament cannot therefore undo or deny to us our Customs and Constitution without committing the ultimate act of treason and betrayal.

Not only must The Great Treason be opposed and stopped - it must also be undone. The United Kingdom Government has, over the last one hundred years, conspired to become a treasonous assembly and Parliamentary dictatorship. Parliament has acted with malice towards the English. It makes unlawful Statute for the purpose of giving life to its treason – and to suppress dissent. The members of this wretched assembly are oath breakers. Parliament has betrayed those English people who have given their lives to defend this sovereign nation. This is The Great Treason.
As members of ‘a people’ – of the descendants of the first people of this Island – we have a natural entitlement to self-determination. And, as descendants of those that gave us, a free people, our Constitution and Law, we have also an irrevocable right to declare lawful rebellion against a malevolent and authoritarian State. The State must be answerable to the people or suffer the consequences as a treasonous assembly.

The Magna Carta is unambiguously a Charter for the freedom of the people. Clearly it does not provide a warrant for anyone resident here to engage in rebellion (Magna Carta, Article 51). It does not extend to the treasoners (obviously), nor to the treasoners' collaborationists and auxiliaries.

The right of self-determination – of the native entitlement of the people of Britain – is reflected in Constitutional Law. And not just in Magna Carta. For example, the Act of Settlement 1700 (section 3) states:
That after the said limitation [of succession] shall take effect as aforesaid no person born out of the kingdoms of England Scotland or Ireland or the dominions thereunto belonging (although he be made a denizen) (except such as are born of English parents) shall be capable to be of the privy council or a member of either House of Parliament or to enjoy any office or place of trust either civil or military or to have any grant of land tenements or hereditaments from the Crown to himself or to any other or others in trust to him.

This is still Law.

The objective of the Lawful Rebellion is therefore to end the Great Treason; to bring the treasoners to account; and to undo the harm done to us by those people.
Lawful Rebellion has the authority of native entitlement; of precedent set in ancient Constitutional agreement; of Natural Law; and of a powerful moral argument. Lawful Rebellion is an act of lawful resistance against an unlawful and treasonous State.
Lawful Rebellion is not a single act… it is a process. It has many facets and comprises the bringing together of people of like-mind who seek to reassert our national sovereignty whether as individuals or in groups under the single and recognised umbrella of ‘lawful rebellion’ so that a variety of actions may be taken that will eventually lead to the unequivocal recognition of our constitution and the acknowledgement of the reassertion of our national sovereignty - in defiance of those who have worked to destroy it.
WANT TO KNOW MORE? http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk

Thanks to Mistral_1945 Comment from The British Resistance.
Mistral_1945

CAMERON'S BAD BET

In my blog of 29th January I said that we should keep our noses out of the Middle East turmoil as we often back the wrong side.

Unfortunately with Gadaffi's troops in the process of retaking Bengazi this prediction has been proved to be correct.
The statement by Hague that Gadaffi had fled to Venezuela was indicative of the incompetence of the government machine and ministers.
Yes we have every sympathy with suppressed people trying to obtain their freedom but we are not able to influence events especially since our forces and military capability have been so much reduced.
Even if we had the power our intervention inevitably causes resentment to some in that troubled area.
Now the Bharein rebellion is about to be put down in spite of our government supporting it from afar.
In Egypt the same military cabal still controls the country as before. Only a few people at the top have been replaced.
In Tunisia the people prevailed as it was less militarised and the leader fled with his loot.

What do these events teach us, and leaders throughout the world?

That military might rules, and you can bet that in future all protests in that region will be hastily put down. The leaders will see that any "softness" will result in their demise and that if they want to survive with all their loot they must rule with a rod of iron.
The vengence on the people who opposed these dictators will be severe, whatever Cameron and his poncy Tories say or their pleas for moderation.

But what other effects will these events have on our country?

Well the rulers will hate us and discriminate against us while those ruled will feel betrayed by the weasel words of Cameron's government. So we lose either way on trade deals and money making opportunities which will be reflected in our unemployment statistics.

Yes we all need oil, but then so does China but they kept their nose out. They are a powerful country but have not taken on the job of the world's policeman so they are on good terms with all countries irrespective of the internal politics of those countries, and they will get the trade and oil.
The Chinese government puts the interests of China first and their people are now benefitting from that policy.

Ill judgement is at the heart of this government Remember those on it agreed with invading Iraq and Afghanistan and look where that got us, but then they have not had enough experience of life to understand what motivates people and thus always seem to back the wrong course of action.

I wouldn't trust them to place a bet on a horse. It would come last as our country will under them

THE ONLY WAY TO DEAL WITH BULLIES.

Good on the fat kid. This should be seen by every kid in the country. With bullies violence works. It worked for me when I was at school. Nobody even tried to bully me after what I did to the bully - and HE was the big one.

Watch the vid, read the article and the comments::

http://www.popehat.com/2011/03/15/if-tomorrow-i-tell-the-press-that-like-a-fat-kid-will-get-humiliated-or-a-nerd-will-be-slapped-nobody-panics-because-its-all-part-of-the-plan-but-when-i-say-that-one-little-bully-will-get/

The squirt in this vid got a broken ankle. Hahahahahahahahaha

Morg
.

CONTRASTS IN PEOPLE

The disaster of the earthquake and the following tsunami in Japanwas horrific in any language.
What impressed me was the stoicism and the unity of the people.
They organised themselves for this seemingly impossible task and everybody is confident the damage will be repaired and that country will rise again soon.

Contrast the lack of looting, the organisation and the order prevailing there with the looting in New Orleans after Katrina.
Contrast it also with Haiti which also has an earthquake but no tsunami and a year later little has been done in the way of reconstruction and murder and theft are commonplace.

What conclusions can we draw from these examples.

First, Japan is a homogenous society which has avoided the enrichment and division of the Western countries, a bit like we were in WW2. Countries like this have people who relate to each other and pull together and their united efforts can overcome seemingly insuperable obsticles.

Second Japanese people are intelligent and hard working. Contrast that with Haiti which has endemic poverty but which is also fairly homogenous but the population is African in origin.
A year after the earthquake they are still sitting around waiting for others to dig them out of their problems.

It will be said correctly that Japan is a modern state and has the resources to cope. But then disaster strikes Japan with frightening frequencies, and still they rise above them.
Also they have a low birthrate and an ageing population giving the lie to those who say we need immigrants to look after their old people.

But Haiti was the first Carribean state to be freed from slavery when the Japanese were also a peasant society.
While the Japanese had the brains to embrace modern technology Haiti adopted a government of corruption and its people embraced voodoo and plundered its rich vegetation.
Haiti has a better climate than Japan and neither has much in the way of natural resources but yet Japan prospers while Haiti was more or less a wasteland even before the earthquake.

They both had the same chances at the same time but with very different outcomes.

Meanwhile we import people of African origin who have shown themselves in every country they rule to be incapable of doing so efficiently and who dilute our national unity and even here most only achieve anything as a result of racist anti British discrimination in their favour.

And I have not even mentioned our tsunami, that of muslim immigration and breeding.

If a natural disaster strikes our country do you think we could cope as have the Japs?

No way, we are too divided with uneducated aliens in our midst, many who do not like the hand that at present feeds them.

We would have no chance.

The" Blitz spirit"of a united Britain?
Forget it.

Fish. Barrel. Gun.

http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com/2011/03/fish-barrel-gun.html

OK, it's a cheap shot but Daily Mail hack Jan Moir really has brought this on herself:

Want to stub out smoking? Put Kate's mug on every pack

Plans for selling brands in plain packets unblemished by alluring brand logos have also been mooted — but I have a better suggestion.

If Kate Moss carries on smoking her good looks away, perhaps they should put a picture of her kippered Croydon pram face on the front of every packet?

Kate Moss

Jan Moir

Don't fancy yours much.

Morg
.

PART THREE OF A FOUR-PART ESSAY Re: ISLAM IN THE U.K.

Below is the third installment of a four-part dossier about Muslim immigration written by El Inglés. This series was originally published as a single dossier in pdf format under the pseudonym “Pike Bishop”.

Previously: Part One and Part Two.



A Consideration of Muslim Immigration into the UK: Part Three
By Pike Bishop

V. If We Fail to Act

We venture forth here into a brief but frank discussion of what the future is likely to hold if Muslims continue to flood into Britain, colonize its town and cities, spit on its people and way of life, and suck the blood out of its economy. Few would choose to stare so intently into the crystal ball of ethno-sectarian violence. But that is precisely why we feel we must.

If Muslim immigration, and through it the rate of growth of the Muslim population itself, cannot be brought under control, which is to say stopped in perpetuity, then British towns and cities will continue to undergo a rapid process of colonization by their various Muslim peoples. This process of colonization will have one very unusual characteristic. Normally, technologically and economically more advanced peoples colonize peoples who are less advanced in these regards. This is why, try as they might, the native American Indians could not effectively oppose, much less reverse, the colonization they underwent at the hands of the British and other European peoples. However, in our case, the opposite will be true, as our colonization will be taking place at the hands of technologically and economically inferior peoples who, barring the odd Afghan on the back of a truck, have to be let in by our immigration apparatus to be here at all.

What this means, in a nutshell, is that this colonization will take place only as long as we allow it to, and we will not allow it forever. Eventually we will completely cast aside the various psychological restraints that have been imposed upon us (and without which said colonization could never have occurred at all), resist it, and, at least to some extent, reverse it. There are only two ways this can happen: a) in a relatively orderly and civilized fashion, when a government with the political will to deal with the problem finally comes to power, or b) in an exceptionally violent and brutal fashion, with government playing by no means the only role, and perhaps not even a particularly large one.

It would be asinine to argue that something of this nature could not happen in modern Europe when we have so recently witnessed similar events in the Balkans. And it would be simply absurd to argue it in a country which has only fairly recently emerged from a brutal ethno-sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland, a conflict that featured massive riots, ethnic cleansing of entire neighbourhoods, an alphabet soup of ruthless paramilitaries, shootings of unarmed civilians by security forces, collusion between security forces and paramilitaries, thousands of bombings, hundreds of civilians killed in cold blood, no-go zones policed by masked men brandishing AK-47s, the assassination of government officials, and a bombing that nearly wiped out the entire cabinet of the day.

The war that awaits us is tribal war, and we assure our readers that it does not consist of generals exchanging pleasantries before battle, folk riding forth and shooting at each other a bit, and some backslapping over a glass of port at the end. Rather, it consists of people identifying entire communities as their enemies and more or less indiscriminately killing them off until the threats they are perceived to constitute have been reduced to acceptable levels, whatever those levels may be. It is surely one of the greatest failures in the history of (supposedly) democratic government as an institution that so many otherwise prosperous, peaceful European countries have been deliberately hurling themselves along this path despite the fact that the eventual outcome must have been reasonably obvious from the start, and is painfully so now.

When such tribal conflict breaks out in Britain (and it certainly cannot be avoided without radical changes to immigration and other policies), the only way for it to come to an end will be for the overwhelming majority of the Muslim population of Britain to leave permanently. There will be no Good Friday Agreement to bring it to an end, and, for deep structural reasons, no equivalent agreement can exist. We will be discussing the Troubles in Northern Ireland in considerably more detail in a subsequent document, but feel obliged to explain this preliminary observation here. The civil rights movement in the nationalist community of Northern Ireland in the late 1960s had specific wrongs that it asked the Northern Ireland Parliament at Stormont to address. Most obviously these were: a) the gerrymandering that assured unionist control of councils even in areas in which nationalists outnumbered unionists, b) the consequent inferior access to council housing enjoyed by the nationalist population, and c) anti-nationalist discrimination in the workplace.

These discriminatory measures were themselves a legacy of a bitter history of colonization and conflict which left unionists, after the partition of Ireland, seeing themselves as outnumbered and besieged on the island of Ireland, with a large nationalist population within their own province whose political loyalty was weak at best and whose influence, they felt, had to be curtailed at all costs. This extreme political polarization and lack of a shared identity or shared interests was what led to the Troubles.

The Good Friday Agreement of 1998, which brought an end to the Troubles as commonly understood, essentially resulted in nationalists being granted a fairer share of political power, and unionists being provided with a guarantee that a united Ireland could only be brought about with the consent of a majority of the people of Northern Ireland. This is how these two different peoples of Northern Ireland have found a way, at least for the last twelve years, of living together in relative peace. But this cannot happen in the event of a conflict between the British and their Muslim fifth column. Indeed, every single part of this compromise in the Good Friday Agreement would be meaningless at best, absurd at worst, in the context of a possible violent conflict of this nature.

As we have already established, the Muslim community of Britain is parasitic with respect to both financial and social capital, criminal and subversive, aggressive and rapidly growing. Its characteristics in these regards are not things it could alter even if it wanted to. Moreover, we cannot grant Muslims the vote, because we have already given them the vote. We cannot give them a fair slice of the economic pie, because they already suck out far more than they put in, consuming wealth created by others with nary a word of thanks. We cannot guarantee them that they will not be incorporated by force into our country, as they are already trying to get every mother’s son in here themselves, by hook or by crook, with the express purpose of being incorporated into it, at least in some sense. And we cannot grant them political influence commensurate with the contributions they make to British society, as their contributions to British society are all severely negative, and the political influence they already have is entirely undeserved and increasingly resented by the indigenous population.

The only way to even try and negotiate a way out of a violent conflict with Muslims would be to give in and grant them some laundry list of demands. But this would simply exacerbate every single one of the problems they already cause, and British anger at them. It is, in large part, this continual retreat in the face of Islamic wrath that has brought us to where we are today. To think that, for example, allowing Muslims in Birmingham to implement full sharia in their neighbourhoods and giving them £50,000 per year for life could somehow solve the problems we would face if they launched a rebellion of some sort would be to tip over in full-blown lunacy. Why not throw in Buckingham Palace as well, and have Anjem Choudary warbling the call for prayer from the roof? It might buy a bit of time with the believers, but is unlikely to go down very well with the natives.

It will be clear to the British people in the case of tribal conflict between them and their Muslim fifth column that defeat will result in the disappearance of their civilization, their way of life, and their existence as a people. Accordingly, they will have to win it, which means they will have to do what needs to be done to win it, which means they will have to do a great many violent and unpleasant things, things that, though quite inconceivable to many at present, will seem right and obvious to most when the nature of the conflict has become sufficiently clear.

We would like to avoid this, but feel that the window of opportunity is closing rather more quickly than some might imagine. Our greatest concern is that, despite the growing anger and alarm on the part of the British people with respect to mass immigration in general and Muslim immigration in particular, these feelings might not give rise to the necessary coalescence of political will on the part of our elected representatives in time to try and prevent the horrendous future that otherwise awaits us. We say again that the only course of action that gives us the slightest chance of avoiding the horrors outlined here is that of shutting down Muslim immigration and refusing to subsidize the higher Muslim fertility that is pushing us towards the brink. If Muslim immigration is shut down, if the cessation of all influxes of Muslims from the ‘old country’ helps Muslims integrate (whatever one understands by the term), and if the Muslim population of the UK stabilizes at a sufficiently low level (whatever that level might be), then there is at least a slight possibility that a British vs. Muslim violent conflict can still be avoided.

However, even this slight possibility will vanish if we do not act quickly, hence the need for immediate action in this regard. For it is crucial to understand here that, the longer we delay in shutting Muslim immigration down, the harder it will become to do so, and the less likely it will be that we can avoid the conflict already described. Though the Muslim population of the UK is about 4%, it is estimated^[25] that approximately 11% of all children born in the UK at present are born to Muslims, a figure which suggests the sheer demographic momentum underlying the problem. Furthermore, banning further Muslim immigration will be correctly perceived by the Muslim population of the UK as seriously undermining its interests in a variety of ways. As such, they will most certainly use the votes their British citizenship give them to oppose any such move at the polls, which makes them a barrier to be overcome in this regard if we wish to solve our Muslim problem in a democratic and non-violent fashion.

We see already, across the European continent, people waking up in country after country to the catastrophic futures that await them if they cannot shake off the death grips that their current political and media establishments hold over the political trajectories of their countries. Yet in Britain, the suicidal see-no-Islam, hear-no-Islam, speak-no-Islam paradigm stumbles onwards like a buffalo shot through the heart but still unaware that it is dead. This document is a part of our personal contribution, however small that may be, to bringing the buffalo of Islamization down before, not after, it tramples us to death. ...
...
...
Don’t you realize this is legally impossible? Think of the EU, the Human Rights Act, the UN, the International blah blah blah blah blah…

In response to this, we can only reply that laws, treaties, and the like are human constructs and therefore open to being changed by human efforts on the basis of human concerns. And changed they will be, sooner or later. If it disapproves, the EU will just have to invade us and show us the error of our ways.

How is this document going to contribute to community cohesion in Britain?

Anybody who thinks this document is supposed to contribute to community cohesion as usually conceived of needs to read it again, this time with their eyes open. This document is a call for the British people to move to shut down a phenomenon, Muslim immigration, which will thrust them into an existential conflict that they will be able to win only through the application of massive violence to Muslims as Muslims. We are not trying to give anyone warm feelings about themselves or their religion. Nor are we trying to envelop the Muslim population of Britain in a tidal wave of love. Can we be any clearer? ...

...
But you just don’t seem to be very nice!

That is correct. We are not very ‘nice,’ and we are prepared to become a good deal less nice if that is what is required to prevent runaway Muslim immigration from destroying our country, our way of life, and our ability to live unmolested in our ancestral lands. If there is any particular reason for the British to allow themselves to be colonized by Muslims, whatever their provenance, now is the time for it to be explained. We are listening…

Please go read it all. It is a long read:

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/03/muslim-immigration-into-uk-part-three.html 

Morg

.