What the Labour Party is doing to you.

[ ... ]

" That's bad enough. What's worse is that the same EU leaders, including the British Foreign Minister, the French President and the German Chancellor, have officially announced the enlargement of the EU to include Muslim North Africa and the Middle East. A proposed European Arrest Warrant lists a number of crimes, including terrorism, armed robbery, rape, and racism and xenophobia, which are punishable throughout the EU. The European Arrest Warrant requires that anyone who is charged by a member state under the listed group of offenses (which could cover just about anything) may be arrested by the authorities of the issuing state within any other member state. The accused must then be transited for trial to the issuing state within ten days, without any interference, judicial or otherwise, by the executing state.

Racism includes "Islamophobia," according to numerous EU documents. Which means that "Islamophobia" will soon be treated as a crime as serious as rape and armed robbery across most of the European continent. At the same time, European leaders are busy enlarging the EU to include North Africa and the Middle East, thus flooding Europe with tens of millions of additional Muslims. Not far into the future, EU authorities can arrest a person in, say, Denmark or Italy, who has published a cartoon that could be considered offensive to Islam. He or she will then be quietly handed over to the authorities in Algeria, Egypt or Jordan. Remember that blasphemy against Islam potentially carries the death penalty according to sharia.

Multiculturalism in Europe is thus reaching its openly totalitarian phase. Those who think this is a joke can look at the Dutch cartoonist who was arrested recently. Several documents that are publicly available (but little known by the general public because they are never referred to by the mainstream media) state that the EU should "harmonize" the education and legal systems with the Mediterranean "partner countries" within the coming decade. This is being negotiated as we speak, behind our backs.

This is part of a long-term plan to merge Europe with the Islamic world. ... "

Read it all:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3290

Write to your M.P. demanding a referendum on the Lisbon (Constitutional) Treaty.

What you haven't been told about the "Harry Potter" murder.

You will have read this story

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/may/25/ukcrime

But why isn't the press telling us this bit?

"Lee Howard, 19, a friend of Robert who saw the trouble, said: “We were in the bar, just having a drink on a Friday night as normal, when word went round that someone was coming down, tooled up with knives.

“We told the bouncers on the door but they told us not to worry. “Then two black men in an Audi A3 turned up outside. The bouncers didn’t seem to search them and let them into the bar. “It kicked off straight away. One of them went up to Jamie and said, ‘I’m going to get you. I’m going to slit your throat.’

“This man threw a chair at Jamie and a big fight erupted. We were all just trying to get the knife off him. “It all spilled outside the bar. We got the man in the bushes but he pulled out another knife. “He had one in each hand and was just lashing out. There must have been six people who he stabbed. It was terrible.” His accomplice fled. One of their group, 21-year-old Dean Saunders, is thought to have been stabbed three times on the left side of his neck. "

28 teenagers and other children murdered with knives and guns so far this year, ten of them (at least) in London. Almost all by non-native British.

However, despite that, my main criticism is reserved for the media who take it upon themselves to decide what is unsuitable for the rest of us to know. And how quickly the media told us - and told us and told us and told us and is still telling us after eighteen years - when they think native British killed a black teenager as in the Steven Lawrence murder.

Does anyone wonder why we no longer trust our politicians or media? Which "profession" is held in the lowest esteem of all? - politicians. Which other profession is down there in the gutter with them? - journalists.

Wonder no more.

Not rearing pigs

Thank you Steve.

This is a letter written on behalf of a friend after the government sent him a cheque for not rearing pigs on his farm.

Rt Hon David Miliband MP
Secretary of State,
Department for Environment,Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA),
Nobel House
17 Smith Square
London SW1P 3JR

16th May 2007

Dear Secretary of State,

My friend, who is in farming at the moment, recently received a cheque for £3,000 from the Rural Payments Agency for not rearing pigs. I would now like to join the “not rearing pigs” business.

In your opinion, what is the best kind of farm not to rear pigs on, and which is the best breed of pigs not to rear? I want to be sure I approach this endeavour in keeping with all government policies, as dictated by the EU under the Common Agricultural Policy. I would prefer not to rear bacon pigs, but if this is not the type you want not rearing, I will just as gladly not rear porkers. Are there any advantages in not rearing rare breeds such as Saddlebacks or Gloucester Old Spots, or are there too many people already not rearing these?

As I see it, the hardest part of this programme will be keeping an accurate record of how many pigs I haven’t reared. Are there any Government or Local Authority courses on this?

My friend is very satisfied with this business. He has been rearing pigs for forty years or so, and the best he ever made on them was £1,422 in 1968. That is-until this year, when he received a cheque for not rearing any.
If I get £3,000 for not rearing 50 pigs, will I get £6,000 for not rearing 100?

I plan to operate on a small scale at first, holding myself down to about 4,000 pigs not raised which will mean about £240,000,for the first year. As I become more expert in not rearing pigs, I plan to be more ambitious, perhaps increasing to, say, 40,000 pigs not reared in my second year, for which I should expect about £2.4million from your department. Incidentally, I wonder if I would be eligible to receive tradable carbon credits for all these pigs not producing harmful and polluting methane gasses?

Another point: These pigs that I plan not to rear will not eat 2,000 tonnes of cereals. I understand that you also pay farmers for not growing crops. Will I qualify for payments for not growing cereals to not feed the pigs I don’t rear?
I am also considering the “not milking cows” business, so please send me any information you have on that too. Please could you also include the current DEFRA advice on set aside fields? Can this be done on an E commerce basis with virtual fields (of which I seem to have several thousand Hectares)?

In view of the above you will realise that I will be totally unemployed, and will therefore qualify for Unemployment Benefits.

I shall of course be voting for your party at the next general election.

Yours Faithfully,

INDOCTRINATION, WASTE AND MORE WASTE

Today it is reported that young people are invited to produce a short film highlighting the benefits of "diversity" under the title "Celebr8 don't discrimin8".This taxpayer funded project is a blatant attempt to brainwash young people into seeing the gradual replacement of our people and way of life as a positive thing.
The judges include famous directors (how much will they be paid?) and "key diversity champions" whoever they are. No platform then for those of us who see the disadvantages or the loss of our way of life. Our function is to continue to pay the taxes which fund this anti British project.

COMPUTERS THROWN IN SKIP.
It is reported that dozens of servicable computers have been thrown in a skip at Abraham Guest school. These were being replaced as part of an upgrade of the school computers. They would have been adequate for use by poorer families as home computers . For a government which fines people for failing to recycle, this demonstrates gross hypocricy, and shows the contempt for the rules they make us obey.

BUREAUCRATIC MATHS.

The Wigan numeracy centre (yes there is such a body) has issued a pamphlet to show primary teachers how to teach maths. We are not talking advance maths here but what we called sums when I went to school. Unfortunately the children can not understand the new methods and thus can not do the sums or if they can take much longer than the old fashioned way. One child I know was distraught and unable to manage the new method but after her mother had shown her the old (proper) way could do her sums quickly. When this was pointed out to the teacher he said that she was doing her sums too quickly and would be bored while having to wait for the others to calculate using the new method. IT GETS WORSE, after two years using the modern method they will have to learn the old way of doing sums in any case.
No wonder standards are dropping! How will our children compete against countries such as China in future when they are being held back by trendy methods imposed by the badly named "Numeracy Centre"?
Another question, why do we need such a centre and how much does it cost. What resources are being diverted away from proper education to fund this office?

BIG BROTHER AND LITTLE HAZEL

Last week Hazel Blears said she wanted to set up a department to monitor up to 10 million people who may be part of extreme religious or political organisations so that steps can be taken to stengthen social cohesion. But how do you define extreme? We know that parties such as ours will be labelled extreme even though we are a legitimate party defending the rights of the British people and in no way threatening civil violence. In their eyes any party which does not subscribe to the political correctness of the other parties is extreme. One can see how this loose definition of extreme can be extended to prevent all discussion or opposition to government policies. It is yet another assault on our civil rights in a country which once prided itself on its free speech.
This suggestion is another wake up call for all free people to work to retain that freedom and the vehicle for that is the BNP as the other parties are all anxious to prevent real opposition to their cosy cartel.
Today it is reported that a massive data base recording all e mails and sites visited on the internet and phone calls is being planned. It seems there will be no privacy allowed all they say in the interests of national security. More like a tool to monitor and thwart all opposition I think and keep the political class in power. The people must always be watched in order to keep them down.
BIG BROTHER WILL BE HERE VERY SOON!

IS THIS RACIST?

Today's reports of riots and unfortunately deaths in South Africa in riots between immigrants from Zimbabwe and poor local workers who feel the immigrants are stealing their jobs is a portent for the future in this country.
While having every sympathy for the people so misruled by Mugabe that they must flee their country, one can also relate to the poor of South Africa's townships who see their already poor standard of living reduced by these refugees/immigrants who can out compete them in the jobs market. As usual it is the poor who have to suffer and it is these who are venting their anger.
Massive immigration always distorts the labour market and stokes up tensions.
In Britain we have been somewhat insulated by the "prosperity" created on the back of massive debt but as the governor of the Bank of England has stated the "nice times are over" and people will become poorer.
One would hope that the government could see the potential for tensions with the present massive rates of immigration if there is a recession, and take appropriate action to halt and reverse this tide, before those tensions erupt in violence, but I'm not holding my breath. Greed will out and short term gain and profit will prevail to the detriment of the vulnerable in the native and immigrant communities.
It is neither fair for the immigrants who have been conned into believing that this country is Shangri La nor to the natives who are squeezed out of a prosperous life.
However in the end our country belongs to us and we should have priority. Is this view racist?.
If it is so considered TOUGH.

DISORDER IN MANCHESTER AND WIGAN

The disgraceful scenes of violence in Manchester by Rangers fans the other day are a demonstration of what is wrong with this country. Similar scenes of disorder can be seen on most Saturday nights in King Street in Wigan "the most dangerous place in Europe" I'm told. The police are fully extended in dealing with this and thus you never see them in other areas.
Last night the traffic lights at a road works in Billinge were vandalised and the previous Saturday the generator was set on fire at the same road works. This is easy to do undetected as the police were busy in the town centre with the usual drunken yobs and the associated bureauocracy in dealing with it.
Poverty and lack of facilities is often blamed by the Liberal elite although how this causes vandalism escapes me.
Alcohol is blamed, presumably in order to increase taxes. This explanation will not do. Many, including myself have drunk to excess in the past but have never been involved in fighting or vandalism.
The real reason for this disorder is the lack of a deterrent. If people have so little respect for their community in the first place then punishment not education is the only option.
Until punishments such as chain gangs and, or the birch are brought in the situation will continue to blight our villages and towns and cost us money in taxes. Even making the jails less like holiday camps would act as a deterrent and reduce prisoner numbers.
Unfortunately the EU and the Human Rights act prevent all these measures so we must continue to suffer for now until the obvious measures are put in place and that means leaving the EU for a start. At present it seems the powers that be seem intent on destroying our society, or should that be"Common Purpose", they're all the same.
Only the BNP is committed to sorting these problems out. Eventually people will see sense. I hope it is not too late.

MAY BULLETIN

MAY MEETING.

The May meeting of the Wigan group will be on Thursday 22/5/08 at 8 pm at the usual venue where we will discuss the local elections and our future plans. All like minded people are welcome to have their say in a friendly atmosphere. If anybody wants to give a short talk on any subject please let me know on 01744 892430. New members can ring me for directions to the venue on this number.

ILL MANNERED AND ANTI DEMOCRATIC

The spectacle of the ill mannered walk off by the Tory, Labour and Lib Dem candidates in the London elections when Richard Barnbrook was about to speak speaks volumes for the contempt for democracy of those candidates. This was compounded a few days later by the segregating of Richard Barnbrook from the other councillors in the chamber with plants and furniture.
Is Richard not allowed to have an opinion? Are the 120,000 people who voted for him to be denied a voice? If these actions had been perpetrated on a person from an ethnic minority there would have been outrage from these same members of the anti British Leftist Mafia.
What was Richard's crime to justify this shunning? He represented the view that our country is being taken over by foreigners, our industry sold off, wages slashed in the interests of big business and native people being treated like second class citizens in an increasingly crime ridden society. These facts should be obvious to even the most stupid voter.
Even if others do not agree, Richard and we who think like him have just as much right to articulate our opinions as anybody else.
Boris Johnson (he of an "amnesty for illegal immigrants" and "don't try to out ethnic me"fame) brags that his family is "more diverse than a United Nations peace keeping force" should understand that others think differently and understand our point of view and our fears. We don't want to be part of a multicultural experiment and we have a right to say so and not have it imposed on us. Just because his family has benefitted by our society, tolerant of immigrants does not mean we all have.
Of course the major parties seek to benefit from the "ethnic vote"in their power hungry struggle, even when this is to the detriment of the country. Their support of measures such as "operation black vote" (surely this is racist?) shows this.
The above shows that the major parties only see their own point of view and react to other opinions which are held by millions of law abiding people in OUR country.
Keep going Richard! The hopes and futures of the majority of British people rest on you.

Islamophobia

A speech from Serge Trifkovic in Vienna on May 10th.

AN EMINENTLY POSTMODERN LITTLE PHOBIA

In the way of an introduction, let us therefore look at the formal, legally tested definition of that word, the latest addition to the arsenal of postmodern “phobias.” It is provided by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) based here in Vienna. (“Orwellian” is a worn-out adjective, but it simply has to be used in connection with this particular institution.) The EUMC diligently tracks the instances of “Islamophobia” all over the Old Continent, which it defines by eight red flags:

1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

2. Islam is seen as separate and “Other.”

3. Islam is seen as inferior to the West, barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

4. Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, linked to terrorism, engaged in a clash of civilizations.

5. Islam is seen as a political ideology.

6. Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand.

7. Discriminatory practices and Muslims’ exclusion from mainstream society are advocated.

8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.

This definition is obviously intended to preclude any possibility of meaningful discussion of Islam. As it happens,

1. That Islam is static and unresponsive to change is evident from the absence of an internal, orthodox critique of jihad, sharia, jizya, etc. As Clement Huart pointed out back in 1907, “Until the newer conceptions, as to what the Koran teaches as to the duty of the believer towards non-believers, have spread further and have more generally leavened the mass of Moslem belief and opinion, it is the older and orthodox standpoint on this question which must be regarded by non-Moslems as representing Mohammedan teaching and as guiding Mohammedan action.” A century later his diagnosis still stands: it is not the jihadists who are “distorting” Islam; the would-be reformers are.

2. That Islam is separate from our Western, Christian, European culture and civilization, and “other” than our culture and civilization, is a fact that will not change even if Europe eventually succumbs to the ongoing jihadist demographic onslaught.

3. Whether Islam is “inferior to the West” is a matter of opinion, of course. That Islam cannot create a prosperous, harmonious, stable, creative, and attractive human society is not. Whether Islam is “barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist” is at least debatable; but that many of its tangible fruits are so, is all too painfully visible.

4. Islam is seen by so many as “violent, aggressive, supportive of terrorism” not because of some irrational “phobia” in the feverish mind of the beholder, but because (a) of the clear mandate of its scripture; (b) of the record of its 14 centuries of historical practice; and above all (c) of the timeless example of its founder.

5. “Islam is seen as a political ideology,” and it should be seen as one, because its key trait is a political program to improve man and create a new society; to impose complete control over that society; and to train cadres ready and eager to spill blood. This makes Islam closer to Bolshevism and to National Socialism than to any other religion. It breeds a gnostic paradigm within which the standard response to the challenge presented by “the Other,” i.e. non-Muslim societies and cultures, is implacable hostility and violence, or violent intent.

6. Criticisms made of the West by Islam should not be rejected out of hand; they should be understood. Its chief “criticism” of the West-and of every other non-Islamic culture or tradition-is that it is infidel, and therefore undeserving of existence.

7. A priori hostility towards Islam should not be “used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims.” Quite the contrary, an education campaign about the teaching and practice of Islam should result in legislative action that would exclude Islam from the societies it is targeting - not because it is an intolerant “religion,” but because it is an inherently seditious totalitarian ideology incompatible with the values of the West.

8. And finally, while anti-Muslim hostility is not a priori “natural or normal,” the desire of non-Muslims to defend their lands, families, cultures and faith against Islamic aggression is “natural and normal”; but the elite class is actively trying to neutralize it.

As the demand for Sharia-based communal self-rule is made with increasing frequency in the banlieus of Paris and the grim West Midlands council estates, Europe’s elite class is ready to throw in the towel.

Go read it all. DO read it all. It's long, but we should ALL know about it. BNP members and non-members.

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/05/counterjihad-vienna-2008.html

Want to argue about it Elliot?

Multiculturalism's war on education.

"Back to school nowadays means back to classrooms, lessons and textbooks permeated by multiculturalism and its championing of "diversity." Many parents and teachers regard multiculturalism as an indispensable educational supplement, a salutary influence that "enriches" the curriculum. But is it?
[ ... ]
What these textbooks reveal is a concerted effort to portray the most backward, impoverished and murderous cultures as advanced, prosperous and life-enhancing. Multiculturalism's goal is not to teach about other cultures, but to promote--by means of distortions and half-truths--the notion that non-Western cultures are as good as, if not better than, Western culture. Far from "broadening" the curriculum, what multiculturalism seeks is to diminish the value of Western culture in the minds of students. But, given all the facts, the objective superiority of Western culture is apparent, so multiculturalists must artificially elevate other cultures and depreciate the West. ... "

Go read it all

http://southafricanhell.blogspot.com/2008/05/multiculturalisms-war-on-education.html

Arguments from Elliot Brown are welcome ... and will be debated in a civil manner.

Ethics

Common knowledge?

Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 600 employees and has the following employee statistics:

* 29 have been accused of spouse abuse

* 7 have been arrested for fraud

* 9 have been accused of writing bad cheques

* 17 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses

* 3 have done time for assault

* 71 cannot get a credit card

* 14 have been arrested on drug-related charges

* 8 have been arrested for shop-lifting

* 21 are currently defendants in lawsuits

* 84 have been arrested for drink driving in the last year

Which organisation is this?

It's the 635 members of the House of Commons, the same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us in line.

REFLECTIONS ON THE ELECTION

The results of the local elections were perhaps a little disappointing but generally we held our own with a slight increase. There were also local issues and complications which always have an effect and which are difficult to quantify.
It is often difficult for a party such as ours whose policies are based on wider national issues to break into the local political scene which is mainly based on problems such as refuse collection and schools where the difference between our policies and those of the other parties is often small. Many of our policies reflect the danger to the country of increased immigration, the EU and illegal wars which are far more important to the future but often do not translate to a local level.
This explains the success of parties such as Independants and CAP who although fairly strong at local level are irrelevant nationally.Unfortunately people are often swayed by the minor issues while missing the big picture, especially in an area as yet relatively "unenriched". The trouble is that when "enrichment" happens and voters can see the writing on the wall we have more voter opposition.
However in standing when realistically we knew we had no real prospect of success we have shown our presence and that we will be there for people to vote for in a general election and give people who want to show their patriotism in the ballot box to be enfranchised. Also we do have an effect on the results far in excess of our vote. Steve Mc Ellenborough, although he polled only178 votes helped defeat the odious, uncouth and boorish Peter Franzen which must be a good thing for democracy and standards in local government.
We must redouble our efforts and continue our steady progress and eventually we will take our country back.
Congratulations to Richard Barnbrook on his success in London. This refects the increasing influence of the Party and that we can triumph inspite of the lies and venom directed against us by the other parties and the often foreign controlled media. They will find it more difficult to deny us a fair hearing in future.
My thanks to all who helped us and who voted for us.
Remember the longest journey starts with one step. We will eventually reach our goal and take our country back.

The results were as follows--

PEMBERTON
Lab 1387
CAP 406
Con 350
CHRIS HILTON BNP 334

WIGAN WEST
Lab 1089
Con 471
Lib Dem 462
SUSAN MATHER BNP 360
Ind 104

ASHTON
CAP 1766
Lab 1111
Con 248
ADRIAN JONES BNP 178

BRYN
Ind 1606
Lab 765
CAP 394
KEN HASLAM BNP 284
Con 204

ORRELL
Con 1608
Lab 969
CHARLES MATHER BNP 548
Ind 321

LEIGH SOUTH
Lab1372
Con 1000
CAP 476
GARY CHADWICK BNP 470

GOLBORNE/LOWTON WEST
Lab 1186
CAP 1110
Con 282
STEVE MC ELLENBOROUGH BNP178
IND 129