Good news at last.
The government sponsored and subsidised Equalities Commission lost in their efforts to destroy our party.
It is ironic that we supporters and members of the British National Party have to pay our taxes to support an organisation dedicated to destroying us and our rights to have a voice.
It is even more offensive that many of the members of this overpaid quango are of foreign origin from their chairman Phillips down. Those not foreign are without exception people with impeccable leftist credentials who view the British people as an obstacle to their multiculti agenda.
We were told as children that we lived in a democracy which protected the right to free speech.
Now we are not allowed to complain about the colonisation of our country except in the most guarded terms. However as Nick Griffin said they can ot stop us thinking unallowed non PC thoughts.
Which other country would gag its inhabitants who wished to protect their standards and customs?
Which other country would subsidise a body led by foreigners to persecute the native people and force on them their agenda?
I can understand why the people on this anti British quango feel as they do. Many of them are not British and thus they look at things from a different viewpoint.
But the fact is that this is OUR country and our wishes should be paramount.
What I can't understand is why our government gave them so much power.
There can be no other reason other than our governing elite wish to destroy our way of life, one that has served us well for centuries and through many threats and turmoils.
Now this government subsidised quango wanted us as a party to open our membership to those who opposed our principles and ideals and tried to bankrupt us for not rolling over and accepting this.
They really are traitors to the British people.
Thank God that the judges have SOME sense of justice and impartiality.
Friday, 17 December 2010
Thursday, 16 December 2010
IS IT A GOOD IDEA?
I know many of you will not agree with me but I think Bob Ainsworth's idea of decriminalising drugs could be a good idea.
I think that if drugs were made available cheaply on prescription it would kill the drug trade stone dead.
It would remove the profit motive and pushers would have no incentive to ply their evil trade. I think it is this pushing which causes many people to start taking drugs and afterwards addicts steal to feed their habit.
These drugs are cheap to manufacture. The cost on the street is due to scarcity caused by the prohibition.
People under the influence of drugs would be prosecuted severely especially if they caused bother and if they did become addicted it would be made clear they would be taken to a spartan detox centre.
If people under this "liberal"regime wish to take harmful substances it should be at their own risk. It is not for the nanny state to look after foolish people.
In recent years when a drug has been banned it becomes more expensive and often popular and when unavailable other substances take over. Also in times past cocaine and opiates were available over the counter and there was no real problem.
This regime I think in removing the incentive in the selling of drugs would do much to reduce drug taking, robbery and best of all the massive amounts made by Asian heroin pushers who use their ill gotten gains to fund terrorism.
Look what happened in the USA with prohibition.
I think that if drugs were made available cheaply on prescription it would kill the drug trade stone dead.
It would remove the profit motive and pushers would have no incentive to ply their evil trade. I think it is this pushing which causes many people to start taking drugs and afterwards addicts steal to feed their habit.
These drugs are cheap to manufacture. The cost on the street is due to scarcity caused by the prohibition.
People under the influence of drugs would be prosecuted severely especially if they caused bother and if they did become addicted it would be made clear they would be taken to a spartan detox centre.
If people under this "liberal"regime wish to take harmful substances it should be at their own risk. It is not for the nanny state to look after foolish people.
In recent years when a drug has been banned it becomes more expensive and often popular and when unavailable other substances take over. Also in times past cocaine and opiates were available over the counter and there was no real problem.
This regime I think in removing the incentive in the selling of drugs would do much to reduce drug taking, robbery and best of all the massive amounts made by Asian heroin pushers who use their ill gotten gains to fund terrorism.
Look what happened in the USA with prohibition.
Wednesday, 15 December 2010
THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR COUNTRY
At one time in the words of Victor Meldrew I would have said "I can't believe it"
Unfortunately nowadays I can believe anything that our rulers do to destroy our country.
As the last Harriers flew off into oblivion or more likely another country in receipt of our foreign aid while we have carriers mothballed,we are informed that in the interests of economy lollipop ladies and men are to be scrapped in some areas. This "improvement" in efficiency will no doubt spread.
How far have we sunk since I was a child in the Forties.
Then there was less money around but everybody worked. There was no "underclass", just honest working people. We had Spitfires and a powerful Royal Navy.
We were self sufficient in energy and manufactures and the greedy bankers had not got their claws into our national wealth.
We had no lollipop people then. Every day at school turning out time (4 pm then) the local police sergeant came up from the police station to escort us across the road. Yes in those days we had local bobbies in whom we were in awe and whose orders had to be obeyed.
We had little traffic in those days and indeed in my village I remember playing football in a B road. But even with so little traffic it was considered important to protect children crossing the main street.
Now, in spite of all the progress and exponential increase in traffic it seems that escorting children across the much busier roads by people on a low wage is unaffordable.
What is affordable is benefits to foreigners who send money back to their countries and who are hailed as heroes by Harriet Harman. Also affordable is legal aid for prisoners in jail to make spurious allegations such as the postman convicted of murder to sue the Post Office for wrongful dismissal even though he will be incarcerated for fifteen years.
Also protected are the many "non jobs" such as diversity officers and health co ordinators whose numbers seem to increase annually.
I believe taxpayers pay their taxes willingly (unless they are Tory donors) but want them to fund those things they think matter.
It is time that our rulers spent our money in the way WE wish in the defence of our country and the safety of our children.
We pay the taxes and they should be used for OUR benefit and not the dross of the world.
Is that not fair? Of course it is but those in power have no concept of fairness.
If we, the ordinary British people are not heard and considered someday, perhaps not so far in the future the pot of our anger will boil over and THEY will feel the consequences.
The people are in a mood for revolt and it will not be the "mummy's boys" of the middle class students who will be revolting, so BEWARE.
Unfortunately nowadays I can believe anything that our rulers do to destroy our country.
As the last Harriers flew off into oblivion or more likely another country in receipt of our foreign aid while we have carriers mothballed,we are informed that in the interests of economy lollipop ladies and men are to be scrapped in some areas. This "improvement" in efficiency will no doubt spread.
How far have we sunk since I was a child in the Forties.
Then there was less money around but everybody worked. There was no "underclass", just honest working people. We had Spitfires and a powerful Royal Navy.
We were self sufficient in energy and manufactures and the greedy bankers had not got their claws into our national wealth.
We had no lollipop people then. Every day at school turning out time (4 pm then) the local police sergeant came up from the police station to escort us across the road. Yes in those days we had local bobbies in whom we were in awe and whose orders had to be obeyed.
We had little traffic in those days and indeed in my village I remember playing football in a B road. But even with so little traffic it was considered important to protect children crossing the main street.
Now, in spite of all the progress and exponential increase in traffic it seems that escorting children across the much busier roads by people on a low wage is unaffordable.
What is affordable is benefits to foreigners who send money back to their countries and who are hailed as heroes by Harriet Harman. Also affordable is legal aid for prisoners in jail to make spurious allegations such as the postman convicted of murder to sue the Post Office for wrongful dismissal even though he will be incarcerated for fifteen years.
Also protected are the many "non jobs" such as diversity officers and health co ordinators whose numbers seem to increase annually.
I believe taxpayers pay their taxes willingly (unless they are Tory donors) but want them to fund those things they think matter.
It is time that our rulers spent our money in the way WE wish in the defence of our country and the safety of our children.
We pay the taxes and they should be used for OUR benefit and not the dross of the world.
Is that not fair? Of course it is but those in power have no concept of fairness.
If we, the ordinary British people are not heard and considered someday, perhaps not so far in the future the pot of our anger will boil over and THEY will feel the consequences.
The people are in a mood for revolt and it will not be the "mummy's boys" of the middle class students who will be revolting, so BEWARE.
Monday, 13 December 2010
THE INEVITABLE
http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2010/12/this-is-inevitable.html
This is inevitable
In the Telegraph: German man castrates teenage daughter's 57-year-old boyfriend.
Helmut Seifert, 47, an ethnic German originally from Russia, was enraged when he heard his 17-year-old daughter was having a relationship with Phillip Genscher, 57.
He went to police in the town of Bielefeld where he lives but officers said they were powerless to intervene.
"The man then recruited two work colleagues at his factory and then went to the house of the victim," said police.
"The man was forced to remove his trousers and, fully conscious, he was castrated. The severed testicles were taken away by the perpetrator."
The man was close to bleeding to death but managed to call police. His life was saved but he remains a eunuch for life.
Seifert pleaded guilty and will be on trial for attempted murder next year. But he has remained silent on who his accomplices were.
He told police: "I received a phone call anonymously that my daughter was involved with a guy 40 years older than her. You said you couldn't stop him – so I did.
"I saw it as my duty as a father."
(emphasis mine)
There are so many things wrong with this. And yet... I don't know I wouldn't have wanted to do the same thing, if presented with the same situation.
One thing struck me, though. That is the highlighted sentence: 'You said you couldn't stop him – so I did'. As our governments continue to dishonour the social contract, we inevitably are going to see (and maybe even do) more of this.
aS THE AUTHORITIES DEVIATE MORE AND MORE FROM THEIR PRIMARY DUTY - WHICH IS TO DEFEND US - WE'LL SEE MORE AND MORE OF THIS SORT OF STUFF AS PEOPLE GET DESPERATE TO DEFEND THEIR OWN. And the media and politicians will pretend to be surprised. It wasn't us that broke the social contract.
Islam will learn a similar lesson: but that will be hard work because whatever we might say about Islam - and I say plenty - it does at least still have its balls.
Morg
This is inevitable
In the Telegraph: German man castrates teenage daughter's 57-year-old boyfriend.
Helmut Seifert, 47, an ethnic German originally from Russia, was enraged when he heard his 17-year-old daughter was having a relationship with Phillip Genscher, 57.
He went to police in the town of Bielefeld where he lives but officers said they were powerless to intervene.
"The man then recruited two work colleagues at his factory and then went to the house of the victim," said police.
"The man was forced to remove his trousers and, fully conscious, he was castrated. The severed testicles were taken away by the perpetrator."
The man was close to bleeding to death but managed to call police. His life was saved but he remains a eunuch for life.
Seifert pleaded guilty and will be on trial for attempted murder next year. But he has remained silent on who his accomplices were.
He told police: "I received a phone call anonymously that my daughter was involved with a guy 40 years older than her. You said you couldn't stop him – so I did.
"I saw it as my duty as a father."
(emphasis mine)
There are so many things wrong with this. And yet... I don't know I wouldn't have wanted to do the same thing, if presented with the same situation.
One thing struck me, though. That is the highlighted sentence: 'You said you couldn't stop him – so I did'. As our governments continue to dishonour the social contract, we inevitably are going to see (and maybe even do) more of this.
aS THE AUTHORITIES DEVIATE MORE AND MORE FROM THEIR PRIMARY DUTY - WHICH IS TO DEFEND US - WE'LL SEE MORE AND MORE OF THIS SORT OF STUFF AS PEOPLE GET DESPERATE TO DEFEND THEIR OWN. And the media and politicians will pretend to be surprised. It wasn't us that broke the social contract.
Islam will learn a similar lesson: but that will be hard work because whatever we might say about Islam - and I say plenty - it does at least still have its balls.
Morg
OUR ADRENALIN FIX
We returned last night from our British National Party conference tired but elated.
The venue was excellent with superb accomodation, catering and a very efficient and friendly staff protected by our stalwarts in security.
Yes it was expensive but what you paid was what you got and we got a lot, and the package was value for money.
There were I'm told sixteen of the great unwashed outside protesting at our right to hold a party conference and general get together.
They were of no consequence and we were not aware of them until we went outside during a break. These antidemocratic mummy's boys and leftie lecturers were protected by the police from coming into contact with our security staff who would have easily coped with them.
I went to the conference with many questions I wanted answered and indeed had written letters requesting these answers, and I thought possibly I would be in trouble for pushing my questions.
In the event my queries and doubts were answered without my asking them, and I realise that much of the trouble in the Party has been caused by people who now we are thankfully rid of.
There was gross inefficiency in the party management most of it perpetrated by those who have now left and we are now on a sound financial footing.
We have voted on a new party structure which will bring a more democratic system than we had previously and indeed than other parties have. Of course this will take a few months to set up but basically it means that all active groups and branches will have an input into Party management.
The policy debates were as usual hard argued with everybody having a chance to have their say. This to me is one of the highlights of these conferences and an indication of our democratic credentials.
Nick's final speech as usual was superb. I don't know how he does it but hearing him speak is like a shot of adrenalin which invigorates and is sometimes necessary for oldies like me.
The Christmas dinner on Saturday night was excellent with good natured leg pulling and craic. Unfortunately we left early 11 pm as we, enthusiastic as we are are getting too old for late night revelry had to call it a night after one short dance.
Some of the younger ones continued for longer causing one organiser to present himself minus his voice on Sunday morning.
So in a nutshell a very enjoyable if tiring weekend, meeting old friends, really getting to the root of any internal problems, and sorting them and without the would be demagogues we had in the past who have shown over the last year their true colours.
Now we realise how much better we are without them, and how our party has progressed over the last few years.
I just wish the general public could have seen us there as we truly are. We would form the next government but then we have the vested interests of the global capitalists against us and always seek to distort our message.
Next year I will try to arrange for more of our local activists to attend and sod the costs so they can get their adrenalin fix, but then we would have to have an even bigger venue.
The best conference ever.
Onwards and upwards.
The venue was excellent with superb accomodation, catering and a very efficient and friendly staff protected by our stalwarts in security.
Yes it was expensive but what you paid was what you got and we got a lot, and the package was value for money.
There were I'm told sixteen of the great unwashed outside protesting at our right to hold a party conference and general get together.
They were of no consequence and we were not aware of them until we went outside during a break. These antidemocratic mummy's boys and leftie lecturers were protected by the police from coming into contact with our security staff who would have easily coped with them.
I went to the conference with many questions I wanted answered and indeed had written letters requesting these answers, and I thought possibly I would be in trouble for pushing my questions.
In the event my queries and doubts were answered without my asking them, and I realise that much of the trouble in the Party has been caused by people who now we are thankfully rid of.
There was gross inefficiency in the party management most of it perpetrated by those who have now left and we are now on a sound financial footing.
We have voted on a new party structure which will bring a more democratic system than we had previously and indeed than other parties have. Of course this will take a few months to set up but basically it means that all active groups and branches will have an input into Party management.
The policy debates were as usual hard argued with everybody having a chance to have their say. This to me is one of the highlights of these conferences and an indication of our democratic credentials.
Nick's final speech as usual was superb. I don't know how he does it but hearing him speak is like a shot of adrenalin which invigorates and is sometimes necessary for oldies like me.
The Christmas dinner on Saturday night was excellent with good natured leg pulling and craic. Unfortunately we left early 11 pm as we, enthusiastic as we are are getting too old for late night revelry had to call it a night after one short dance.
Some of the younger ones continued for longer causing one organiser to present himself minus his voice on Sunday morning.
So in a nutshell a very enjoyable if tiring weekend, meeting old friends, really getting to the root of any internal problems, and sorting them and without the would be demagogues we had in the past who have shown over the last year their true colours.
Now we realise how much better we are without them, and how our party has progressed over the last few years.
I just wish the general public could have seen us there as we truly are. We would form the next government but then we have the vested interests of the global capitalists against us and always seek to distort our message.
Next year I will try to arrange for more of our local activists to attend and sod the costs so they can get their adrenalin fix, but then we would have to have an even bigger venue.
The best conference ever.
Onwards and upwards.
Saturday, 11 December 2010
YVONNE FOVARGUE MAKERFIELD MP - RUBS THE NOSES OF THE BOROUGH'S BELEAGUERED HARD WORKING - AS THE LABOUR PARTY CONTINUE IN THIER PIT OF CONTEMPT!
A few posts earlier we published the list of parliamentary expenses claimed to date by one of our local MP's Lisa "Is She or Isn't She" Nandy. (And thanks must go to the Guido Fawkes Blog and also one of our anonymous readers to putting us onto this.)
Well, as I stated I would - I have now imported the full list of expenses claims to-date by another Wigan Borough snout in the trough and Makerfield MP - Yvonne Fovargue for you to muse and ponder over. You will note that it only shows expenses claims up to the month of July which makes it all the more appalling. (I'm wondering if the claims are released on a quarterly basis?).
Have these damn people no damn shame at all? They've been half heartedly dragged over the coals for fraudulent claims and with a few being prosecuted, and yet they still have the audacity to continue to bleed us dry!! Anyway, why aren't the masked thugs, anarchists, and British hating scum not rioting on the streets over the blatant theft from the public purse? Surely, if we stopped the "fingers in the till" fervour of all our contributed billions of pounds each year by our elected low life and thieving politicians this would certainly ease the tuition fee's dilemma wouldn't it? Or, is that just too simple a solution to not a very complicated issue?
It makes hard reading when you see that the cow Fovargue has claimed not only for a TV Licence but also for her house contents insurance and other "you are now really taking the piss out of me" claims!
It looks like a couple of the claims below may have been duplicated? I wonder if the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority are aware of this? (E-mail on it's way.)
Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Accommodation Rent | 01/07/2010 | £141.04 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Accommodation Rent | 01/07/2010 | £1,430.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Accommodation Rent | 01/07/2010 | £1,430.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Home Contents Insurance | 01/07/2010 | £77.42 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Interim Hotel London Area | 20/05/2010 | £387.75 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Interim Hotel London Area | 28/05/2010 | £517.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Telephone Usage/Rental | 01/07/2010 | £7.69 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Accommodation | Television Licence | 01/07/2010 | £145.50 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | General Admin | Payment Telephone/Mobile | 09/05/2010 | £9.36 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | General Admin | Payment Telephone/Mobile | 07/06/2010 | £28.26 | |
| First 1 2 3 Next Last | ||||||
Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | General Admin | Payment Telephone/Mobile | 07/07/2010 | £30.88 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Food & Drink @ Parliament | 01/07/2010 | £5.25 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Food & Drink @ Parliament | 01/07/2010 | £9.20 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Food & Drink @ Parliament | 01/07/2010 | £7.65 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Own Car MP | 28/05/2010 | £76.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - RTN | 28/05/2010 | £245.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - SGL | 28/05/2010 | £124.50 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - SGL | 28/05/2010 | £45.50 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - SGL | 10/06/2010 | £33.10 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - SGL | 10/06/2010 | £99.00 |
Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - SGL | 10/06/2010 | £99.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - SGL | 10/06/2010 | £74.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Public Tr RAIL - SGL | 17/06/2010 | £99.00 | |
| Yvonne Fovargue | Makerfield CC | Travel | Taxi After Late Sitting | 21/07/2010 | £10.40 | |
| First Previous 1 2 3 Last | ||||||
Total for this search = £5,132.50
Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Accommodation Rent
Amount £1,430.00
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details Rent 28.5.10 - 27.6.2010
Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Accommodation Rent
Amount £1,430.00
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details Rent for July 2010
Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Accommodation Rent
Amount £141.04
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details Pro-rata Rent 28.6.10 - 30.6.10
Travel
Nights
Mileage
Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Home Contents Insurance
Amount £77.42
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details for period 1.6.2010 to 31.5.2011
Claim Ref. No. 4908
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Interim Hotel London Area
Amount £387.75
Transaction Date 20/05/2010
Short Description
Details [***] 17th, 18th and 19th May 2010
Claim Ref. No. 9098
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Accommodation
Expense Type Television Licence
Amount £145.50
Transaction Date 01/07/2010
Short Description May/June/July Rent
Details TV licence fee valid until 31.5.2011
Claim Ref. No. 21129
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Travel
Expense Type Taxi After Late Sitting
Amount £10.40
Transaction Date 21/07/2010
Short Description
Details House sat after 11.15p.m
Claim Ref. No. 11375
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Travel
Expense Type Public Tr RAIL - SGL
Amount £99.00
Transaction Date 10/06/2010
Journey Type Westminster to Const Office
Journey Euston to Wigan
Short Description Travel Card - Rail 28/5 -17/6
Details HILLGATE TRAVEL /LDN/P [***]
Travel First
Nights
Mileage
Claim Ref. No. 11375
MP Yvonne Fovargue
Financial Year 2010-11
Expense Category Travel
Expense Type Public Tr RAIL - SGL
Amount £74.00
Transaction Date 10/06/2010
Journey Type Const Office to Westminster
JourneyMileage Wigan to Euston
Short Description Travel Card - Rail 28/5 -17/6
Details HILLGATE TRAVEL /LDN/P [***]
Travel First
Nights
Friday, 10 December 2010
CAMERON'S RABBLE TURN ON THEIR LEADER
The disgraceful anarchic scenes at yesterday's "student" protest did nothing to further any just cause the students may have had.
This is an issue in which I am pulled two ways.
I feel it is ironic that those in power from wealthy families had their education paid for but expect students to incur large debts nowadays.
When I was a student the poorest were better off than the more affluent as they had large grants in addition to their free education.
In recent years the misguided policy of making a degree obligatory even though its quality and subject suspect has caused a huge increase in student numbers and university costs. We do not need 50% of kids to have a degree and as is well known many subjects are worthless to employers.
One woman stated on television yesterday that many would not earn £21,ooo per year after qualifying in "arts" subjects, a good indication of the value of their "degrees"
Education is too important to be used as a means of keeping the young off the unemployment lists. It should be an investment in our national future and students guided towards subjects the nation needs. If the subject a student wants to take is of no use to the country it should receive no subsidy and that student encouraged to take another subject if they are capable.
However the fact is that many are not really capable of doing worthwhile degrees and therein lies the solution.
Scrap all the non essential courses thus cutting the number of students by 50% and subsidising those courses which bring a return on our national investment. Media studies sport subjects and other non academic subjects may be interesting and people may like doing them. Fine but do them at your own expense as they have no value in the market place or to the nation.
I used to like sex but did not expect to be subsidised in my efforts.
The increased competition for those courses on offer would raise standards and make us more competitive internationally.
HOWEVER even the expensive mediocre educational shambles could be financed if the government cut its pledge on foreign aid, the EU, financing bankers and exiting the Afghan war, and they know it. If they don't they must be stupid.
I believe all this dumbing down of standards and the many Mickey Mouse courses conducted by left wing lecturers is part of a scheme to indoctrinate the less able students with left wing and anti British political opinions more compatible with "The New World Order" so beloved by our ruling classes. This was shown in the vandalism of our public buildings yesterday and the desecration of our memorials to our war dead and national heroes.
You can see in what contempt this scum holds our country.
Of course not all the vandalism nor even most was perpetrated by students.
Many of the worst outrages were committed by Cameron's attack dogs,his UAF and SWP rabble. It is ironic that these dogs turned on their sponsors, and notable how few arrests were made.
Imagine a BNP rally which descended into such chaos. The jails would have been full.
How to stop future outrages?
Simples. Charge the universities for the costs of this mayhem forcing them to restrict further the number of so called students they admit, and expel any student guilty of mindless vandalism.
Ensure that crime does not pay.
Whatever your complaint attacking our cenotaph is inexcusable.
This is an issue in which I am pulled two ways.
I feel it is ironic that those in power from wealthy families had their education paid for but expect students to incur large debts nowadays.
When I was a student the poorest were better off than the more affluent as they had large grants in addition to their free education.
In recent years the misguided policy of making a degree obligatory even though its quality and subject suspect has caused a huge increase in student numbers and university costs. We do not need 50% of kids to have a degree and as is well known many subjects are worthless to employers.
One woman stated on television yesterday that many would not earn £21,ooo per year after qualifying in "arts" subjects, a good indication of the value of their "degrees"
Education is too important to be used as a means of keeping the young off the unemployment lists. It should be an investment in our national future and students guided towards subjects the nation needs. If the subject a student wants to take is of no use to the country it should receive no subsidy and that student encouraged to take another subject if they are capable.
However the fact is that many are not really capable of doing worthwhile degrees and therein lies the solution.
Scrap all the non essential courses thus cutting the number of students by 50% and subsidising those courses which bring a return on our national investment. Media studies sport subjects and other non academic subjects may be interesting and people may like doing them. Fine but do them at your own expense as they have no value in the market place or to the nation.
I used to like sex but did not expect to be subsidised in my efforts.
The increased competition for those courses on offer would raise standards and make us more competitive internationally.
HOWEVER even the expensive mediocre educational shambles could be financed if the government cut its pledge on foreign aid, the EU, financing bankers and exiting the Afghan war, and they know it. If they don't they must be stupid.
I believe all this dumbing down of standards and the many Mickey Mouse courses conducted by left wing lecturers is part of a scheme to indoctrinate the less able students with left wing and anti British political opinions more compatible with "The New World Order" so beloved by our ruling classes. This was shown in the vandalism of our public buildings yesterday and the desecration of our memorials to our war dead and national heroes.
You can see in what contempt this scum holds our country.
Of course not all the vandalism nor even most was perpetrated by students.
Many of the worst outrages were committed by Cameron's attack dogs,his UAF and SWP rabble. It is ironic that these dogs turned on their sponsors, and notable how few arrests were made.
Imagine a BNP rally which descended into such chaos. The jails would have been full.
How to stop future outrages?
Simples. Charge the universities for the costs of this mayhem forcing them to restrict further the number of so called students they admit, and expel any student guilty of mindless vandalism.
Ensure that crime does not pay.
Whatever your complaint attacking our cenotaph is inexcusable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)