Labour's hypocrisy over migrants: How the party is trying to woo voters with tactics that would shame the BNP

I had to put this on here.

All the so-called polls have been showing a Small Conservative Majority and ZaNu Labour are second.
Then what are zaNu Labour worried about ?
Wasn't the MSM telling us that the BNP are losing members ?

Is the real truth in these polls showing a massive rise for the BNP ?
Whatever it is..THEY'RE TERRIFIED.

ROLL ON GENERAL ELECTION.

"The carefully worded letters all send the same sympathetic messages to local 'white families' about the difficulties caused by the record rise in immigration.

Soothing words of comfort are combined with powerful pledges of action to ease the pressure on jobs, school places and council housing.

'There is a great deal of worry about the pressure on schools, doctors' surgeries and housing allocations,' reads one of them. 'I want you to help me keep the pressure up on the Government in relation to reforming and updating our immigration and citizenship rules and laws.'

Stirring stuff indeed. So which party do you think is promising to fight the Government on these policy failings? The Conservatives? UKIP, perhaps?

No, with astonishing hypocrisy, these pledges come from the Labour Party itself. For the authors are senior Labour MPs who fear losing their seats as a result of the political fall-out from the mass immigration policy that they gladly helped to implement.

Dozens of these letters from sitting Labour MPs have been passed to the Daily Mail - and the authors all have one thing in common. They are fighting for their political lives because of the threat posed by the odious, far-Right British National Party.

They include Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary and key ally of Gordon Brown, and Margaret Hodge, the Culture Minister who is fighting a seat in the East End of London.

Some of the leaflets sent out to constituents include dubious immigration questionnaires and promises that local people will be put first in the jobs queue.

Labour's hypocrisy has come to light only days after the scale of Labour's deliberate plan to create a multicultural Britain through mass immigration was revealed.

A draft Cabinet Office report, uncovered by a Freedom of Information request, showed how, in 2000, Labour ministers deliberately plotted to open the floodgates to new migrants to achieve the party's 'social objectives'. Traditionally, new immigrants vote for Left-wing parties.

The document also revealed how those who dared to question this policy would be branded 'racists'.

Today, however, on the cusp of a General Election, many Labour MPs have realised that their secret plan has backfired spectacularly. As a result of mass immigration, many of their core white working-class voters complain that they feel like second-class citizens in their own communities, and believe that immigrants are given unfair precedence for jobs and public services.

As a result, Labour MPs in marginal seats or with a BNP threat are desperately scrambling to play the race card in a shameless attempt to be seen as acting tough on immigration after all.

One of the MPs at the heart of the new get-tough policy on immigration in constituency backyards is Mr Balls, who is the Prime Minister's closest political friend.

Mr Balls has been at the centre of Cabinet decision-making over the past decade and will have been only too well aware of Labour's encouragement of a multicultural Britain.

Mr Balls, a front-runner to succeed Mr Brown as Labour leader, has held two public meetings and produced direct mail and questionnaires on the immigration issue in his newly-created Morley and Outwood constituency.

Significantly, the Schools Secretary's Yorkshire constituency is a fertile breeding ground for the BNP, which already has one BNP councillor and hundreds of members registered locally.

In his recent constituency newsletter, Mr Balls wrote: 'I want to have a conversation with you about immigration. What we really need is proper discussion about the difficulties and benefits that immigration can bring to our country.'

He admitted that there were 'concerns about jobs in our area', and asked: 'Do you support updating our immigration laws so that: migrants who want to settle here must speak English? A probationary period should be passed before they are able to claim state benefits?'

It is a similar story in Barking - the East London constituency where BNP leader Nick Griffin is fighting the Culture Minister Margaret Hodge.

With one of the highest rates of immigration in Britain, Barking has seen a massive social upheaval as a result of Labour's policy, with many local families struggling to come to terms with the sheer number of new arrivals from abroad.

Yet in a two-page letter to constituents, Mrs Hodge paints herself as being tough on immigration, saying that it can be 'very unsettling' for 'predominantly white' and 'traditional East End families'.

She adds: 'I respect your concerns about the pace of change. It is wrong for others to dismiss these out of hand and rest assured that you do have my support on this.'

Earlier this month, Mrs Hodge even suggested that migrants should be forced to 'earn' the right to benefits and council housing over several years. She warned that British values of tolerance were under threat because of an increasing sense of 'unfairness' over immigration.

In his recent constituency newsletter, Mr Balls wrote: 'I want to have a conversation with you about immigration. What we really need is proper discussion about the difficulties and benefits that immigration can bring to our country.'

He admitted that there were 'concerns about jobs in our area', and asked: 'Do you support updating our immigration laws so that: migrants who want to settle here must speak English? A probationary period should be passed before they are able to claim state benefits?'

It is a similar story in Barking - the East London constituency where BNP leader Nick Griffin is fighting the Culture Minister Margaret Hodge.

With one of the highest rates of immigration in Britain, Barking has seen a massive social upheaval as a result of Labour's policy, with many local families struggling to come to terms with the sheer number of new arrivals from abroad.

Yet in a two-page letter to constituents, Mrs Hodge paints herself as being tough on immigration, saying that it can be 'very unsettling' for 'predominantly white' and 'traditional East End families'.

She adds: 'I respect your concerns about the pace of change. It is wrong for others to dismiss these out of hand and rest assured that you do have my support on this.'

Earlier this month, Mrs Hodge even suggested that migrants should be forced to 'earn' the right to benefits and council housing over several years. She warned that British values of tolerance were under threat because of an increasing sense of 'unfairness' over immigration."

GREEN WORLD ORDER

.

Leaked policy documents reveal that the United Nations plans to create a “green world order” by 2012 which will be enforced by a structure of global governance and funded by a gargantuan $45 trillion transfer of wealth from richer countries, as the globalists’ insidious plan to centralize power, crush sovereignty while devastating the economy is exposed once again.

As we warned at the time, the failure of Copenhagen in December did not spell the end of the global warming heist, but merely a roadblock in the UN’s agenda to create a world government funded by taxes paid by you on the very substance you exhale – carbon dioxide.

Using the justification of the vehemently debunked hoax that carbon dioxide is a deadly threat to the planet, the UN is already working to resurrect the failed Copenhagen agreement, with a series of new Copenhagen process negotiations set to take place in April, May and June.

Leaked planning documents (PDF) obtained by Fox News lift the lid on the UN’s plan to impose global governance by the time of their 2012 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio, which will mark the 20th anniversary since the notorious “Earth Summit” held in the same city.

“The new Rio summit will end, according to U.N. documents obtained by Fox News, with a “focused political document” presumably laying out the framework and international commitments to a new Green World Order,” reports Fox News’ George Russell.

Read more

 http://ukwebspider.blogspot.com/2010/02/leaked-un-documents-reveal-plan-for.html

Morg

PS I'm away for a few days  from tomorrow.

EUSSR

.
http://dickpuddlecote.blogspot.com/2010/02/mandelson-seems-very-certain.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DickPuddlecote+%28Dick+Puddlecote%29

Mandelson Seems Very Certain

Britain will "one day" adopt the euro, business minister Peter Mandelson said on Friday, but admitted that the changeover is not likely any time soon.

"We already have the eurozone providing a single central bank, currency and monetary policy, which one day I believe Britain will be part of," Mandelson said during a talk at a university in Paris.

"Don't ask me when. It's not going to be soon, but we will do it,"

Really, Mandy? You seem very sure. Were you planning to ask your electorate about the matter?

Considering that polls consistently say that Britain is a solidly eurosceptic country, even without the spectre of joining the Euro being involved, how do you come to such a bald conclusion?

Still, we should worry not, as any decision on ditching sterling will surely require a referendum. And any move towards the eurozone will certainly need to be a solid manifesto commitment prior to a general election.

Oh, hold on. 

Are the people of Wigan going to keepvoting for these people?  And what about the local expenses scandal?

A Wigan councillor who cannot drive has paid back hundreds of pounds claimed for mileage expenses.

The move came after a spending watchdog was called in by another councillor to probe Town Hall expense claims.

Independent opposition councillor Jim Ellis asked the district auditor to look at mileage claims submitted for journeys taken on town hall business. He claimed to have found evidence of:

Councillors who do not have a driving licence claiming mileage for journeys;

Inflated home-to-town hall mileage claims.

Households with two councillors travelling together but putting in separate claims.

Short journeys always being rounded up.

Now one councillor has paid back £355 claimed over a 10-year period in advance of the outcome of the investigation.

Today director of finance David Smith confirmed: "One individual who has claimed mileage for legitimate council meetings, but who does not drive, has decided to repay the car mileage expenses – £355 spread over 10 years – for those meetings, as it could be implied they claimed unfairly, even though they would have been entitled to claim public transport costs should they have travelled by that means."

Independent Conservatives Leader Coun Gareth Fairhurst, who claims his group has NEVER claimed mileage expenses, said: "I am hearing disturbing things that members are claiming mileage allowances when they do not even drive.

"I'm being sent the information and if I find this is the case and the figure is large enough, I will report it to the police. I want the council to crack down on this because it is a disgrace and anyone found guilty should be kicked off the council."

The 39.5p per mile mileage expense rate claimed by councillors is within the Inland Revenue approved rate of 40p per mile. The council last reviewed the issue in 2006 when the local Independent Panel on Members' Allowances looked at it.

Allowances were set nationally in 2000 and they have decided to stick to these rates since.

READ ABOUT IT HERE 

Morg
.

1984 - WARNING OR INSTRUCTION MANUAL?

 

Grahame Park in Barnet is one of the largest council estate ever built by the old GLC.  Some 1,777 homes sit cheek by jowl, or rather drug addled resident by asylum seeker resident, for although the estate was popular when it was originally built, it has been plagued by problems, and it now requires ‘regeneration due to the concentration of vulnerable and disadvantaged people’ – Nu-Labour code speak for it ‘has become a Hell hole’.

Over the next 15 years, it is intended that some 20 million pounds will be spent on bringing it up to modern living standards. That is a significant sum of money to be spent on under 2,000 homes.

So it was with some surprise that I noted included in the budget, the undeclared cost of the ‘first ever’ dedicated television station to be installed in social housing.

Wow!

Why would they spend money on an innovative dedicated television station  to  serve  just one estate when they cannot find the money to carry out basic maintenance?

The answer is buried deep -

Barnet Homes and partner organisations will use Grahame Park TV (GPTV) to broadcast short films and messages. The messages will be broadcast from a large screen on The Concourse.

This is the first time that a British social landlord has introduced its own dedicated television station for tenants and leaseholders. Grahame Park residents will be able to wish their friends  (sic) on their birthdays, tell a joke or show off their musical skills on GPTV.

Key election messages will also be automatically sent to residents’ mobile phones using Bluetooth.

I do hope that the electoral commission wil be ensuring that a fair balance of ‘key election messages’ is beamed to these vulnerable and disadvantaged people.

Read more: http://www.annaraccoon.com/politics/the-barnet-formula-revised/#ixzz0gfshFXW8

AND THE COMMENTS ARE WORTH A LOOK.

I went into the Doctors today. A few months ago a screen was installed in the waiting room. Today it was active. All it played was public service infomercials. All the time, endlessly and I would imagine for as long as the surgery is open. This "service" is run by an operation called the Life Channel: their website is at  http://www.thelifechannel.com/ if you fancy having a look.


Now elsewhere in the blogosphere there are an increasing number of mumblings about the number of government-sponsored advertisements on radio and TV at the moment.

Well, lifechannel is yet another outlet for government propaganda, whether its the new onslaught against drinkers, or blatant misrepresentation about how flexible the NHS is (yeah right!).

However, there's more: lifechannel seems to be installed in schools as well as doctor's surgeries. Is it really right that such a service is installed in schools? I'm pretty sure it shouldn't be.

I'm also pretty sure that taxpayer's money shouldn't be spent on this sort of unneccessary  expense in the middle of a financial crisis. This government is literally throwing money away. I would rather live my life without these expensive intrusions, thank you very much.

Of course, with little digging, it gets worse: there's a link on the lifechannel website, to another called "The Community Communication Network.

Yet another waste of money.

Not only that, but very big brother: the government sponsoring the installation of video screens spouting what amounts to propaganda almost 24 hrs a day, at your expense. This is as big a waste of money as the DfID.

Are you happy about that? I'm sure as hell I'm not.

http://delphiusdebate.blogspot.com/2010/02/lifechannel.html 

Morg

.

EDUCATION EDUCATION EDUCATION

.
Why do you think the education system has been all but ruined by the Control Mechanism (what most people call "The Establishment")?

Answer:

“Thought, like all potent weapons, is exceedingly dangerous if mishandled. Clear thinking is therefore desirable not only in order to develop the full potentialities of the mind, but also to avoid disaster.”
-Giles St. Aubyn

http://henrynorthlondon.blogspot.com/2010/02/famous-quote-no-12.html 

Can't have our kids learning how to think eh? They might start asking awkward questions about the disaster this country has become.


Morg
.

THE WRONG BLACK

If America absolutely HAD to elect a black man as President, why not this one instead of O'Bummer? Change just a few words and Mr Griffin could have made this speech:



Morg
.

I'M STILL NOT SURPRISED.

.
Catmeat. Uncovered women are for the taking. Uncovered women are whores. Infidel women are ‘war booty’ for the soldiers of Allah. They deserve to be raped:  Sadiq Hussein, 20, and Abdillahi Adan, 18, are totally innocent. They just followed their prophet Muhammad, who raped women of Jewish tribes after slaughtering their men and sold their children into slavery. How dare we apply man made law on these good muslims! What an injustice!

Liverpool rapists scream abuse at victim after being jailed at Liverpool Crown Court

 http://sheikyermami.com/ 

 

 

Sadiq Hussein, 20, and Abdillahi Adan, 18, hurled vicious abuse at their victim as they were each locked up for eight-and-a-half years. Hussein, of Chatsworth Drive, Edge Hill, and Adan, of Daniel Davies Drive, Toxteth, both denied rape, but were convicted by a jury.


The pair tried to jump from the dock and had to be restrained by security guards and police officers as they screamed threats and insults at their 18-year-old victim.


Liverpool Crown Court heard they had "preyed upon" their vulnerable victim and led her into Princes Park, Toxteth, after she asked for directions.


Judge David Aubrey QC said: "While you both raped her, one after the other, she was distressed, she was crying, she was crying for help and she was crying for you to stop.


"Her fear, anxiety, apprehension, trepidation is in my judgement immeasurable.


"But notwithstanding her cries for you to stop and her cries for help neither of you desisted."

"THE RELIGION OF PEACE.....IMPOSING ITSELF ON TOWNS AND CITIES NEAR YOU."

http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2010/02/22/liverpool-rapists-scream-abuse-at-victim-after-being-jailed-at-liverpool-crown-court-92534-25890640/

Morg
.

VOTE BNP

VOTE BNP 2010 GENERAL ELECTION.




THE RELIGION OF PEACE.....IMPOSING ITSELF ON TOWNS AND CITIES NEAR YOU.

A COUNTRY FIT FOR HEROS - BRITAIN 2010

Has the LAW/JUDICIARY in this country gone Extreme Left Wing? Where Islam is protected and it's adherents only need cry racist and they're getting untold £££££ in compensation. Where British Soldiers are spat at and abused by ISLAMISTS on their return home.

An Iraqi-born yob who spat on a World War II hero's medals on

Remembrance Day yesterday escaped jail.

Serwan Abdullah, 23, targeted Timothy House while he was wearing his late grandfather’s accolades after a commemorative parade.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1253660/Iraqi-yob-spat-WWII-heros-medals-escapes-jail.html?ITO=1490

Where "MUSLIMS" can leave this country to travel at will, to learn how to fight on the BATTLEFIELDS OF FAILED ISLAMIC STATES. New Labour despise Britain and it's people so much that they allow Islamists to run out-of-control and then make Laws which facillitate the spread and Growth of the Anti-British foreign ISLAMISTS .
http://www.infowars.com/neocons-say-u-s-embassy-with-medieval-moat-will-prevent-attacks-by-londonistan-terrorists/
(Read in the context that Anjem Choudry may be an MI5/MI6 agent. He has claimed that he is not in reciept of 'JOB SEEKERS ALLOWANCE" and that he is "PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT" and I dont mean receiving a Giro.)


Don't forget that most of ZaNu Labours "HATE CRIMES" are Laws which PUNISH THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION if they DARE to complain. I keep getting told that the BRITISH ARE A TOLLERANT LOT. Really ?
Is that why THEY(Lib/Lab/Con) have to bring in "EQUALITY LAWS" or the new "HATE LAWS".TO PUNISH THOSE INDIGENOUS WHITE BRITONS WHO DARE SPEAK OUT OR BE INTOLLERANT OF THE ATTACKS UPON THEMSELVES BY RACE QUANGOS THAT ARE RUN FOR THE REPRESENTATION OF NON-ETHNIC OR NON-INDIGENOUS BRITS?
TO BAN THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION ANY RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION OR ASSOCIATION unless it's first approved by New Labour RACE HATE QUANGO the EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission).

If the EHCR say the BRITISH ARE TOO BRITISH, a LAW will be drafted and enacted TO DENY RIGHTS TO AND OPPRESS THOSE WHO MAY BE TOO BRITISH, "TOO WHITE". If this is what FOREIGN ISLAMIST SCUM do to the memory of our HEROIC FORFATHERS then it can't be too long before Civil War enters the streets of our once great country. BLAME THE LIB/LAB/CON for this.

PUNISH THE LIB/LAB/CON WITH THIS 'X' ON THE BALLOT PAPER NEXT TO BNP.

POETIC JUSTICE

Well at least there is some good news today.
The over promoted crook "Commander" Disaei has been attacked in jail and "slops" thrown over him.
In a way I feel sorry for the slops which had to make contact with his corrupt head. No doubt he had met some people in jail who had been wrongly convicted on account of his evidence.
Whatever, he seems to have the same popularity rating in jail as Ian Huntley the child murderer.


I have always objected to this to this verminous policeman who, having benifited from a public school education in England and gaining promotion on the spurious grounds of his race, lording it over us poor Brits who, while persecuted by him and his "Black Police Association" were forced to pay taxes to fund him and his ilk.


In spite of his privelidged education and foreign birth he has used the unjust laws enacted by this misguided government to advance his anti British agenda.
I have nothing against advancement on merit, but this arrogant slimeball thought he was untouchable by virtue of his playing "the race card".
He made a mistake on the last time by trying to fit up an ethnic who courageously stood up to him. Well done that lad.
If it had been an ethnic Brit it would have been him who was in jail.
It just goes to show how thw law is stacked against the British people.

YES I'M GLAD HE HAS BEEN ATTACKED and I hope he lives in fear for the rest of his sentence,(and rots in Hell afterwards)
Perhaps he will then realise that justice in this country is impartial and colour blind and not to be perverted by scum like him however many ethnic associations he may have backing him AND if the law will not impose justice there others who will even in jail, for even among hardened criminals there is a code of conduct which you cross at your peril.

WHY NO SURPRISES?

Why am I not surprised at the crime?

Why am I not surprised at the previous bail about yet another murder?

Why am I not surprised by this picture?

Why wouldn't it surprise me if all his accomplices looked similar?

A member of the robbery gang that killed a shop manager was on police bail for a previous fatal stabbing, it can be reported today.

Anthony Maina, 20, took part in the deadly raid at a Matalan store five months after knifing a teenager during a mobile phone robbery.

Jamie Simpson, a popular shop manager, 33, was stabbed in the neck with a 10in kitchen knife during the botched Matalan raid in March 2008.

Today it emerged that Maina had been arrested shortly after the murder of a teenager, Rizwan Darbar, in October 2007, but was given police bail due to lack of evidence.

He was at large for 15 months, during which time he took part in the killing of Mr Simpson as well as being caught with a knife, cannabis, crack cocaine and heroin. It was only after months of painstaking mobile phone analysis that police were able to charge Maina, in January last year, over Mr Darbar's murder.

At his Old Bailey trial last year the jury was told how Maina, then just 17, had been hiding in bushes as an accomplice robbed Mr Darbar before urging Maina to “poke” his victim. With a “speedy” jab Maina plunged the knife into Mr Darbar’s stomach, severing an artery. He was jailed for life and must spend a minimum of 14 years behind bars. His name could not be reported as by then he was facing a second trial over the death of Mr Simpson.

Detectives were forced to undertake another painstaking investigation to trace Mr Simpson’s killers, who were not charged until March 2009.

The gang who carried out the Matalan raid wore hooded tops and could not be identified by witnesses or CCTV. When police found the getaway car, it had already been crushed.

But they tracked down another vehicle which had been used to steal it in a carjacking and found the fingerprints of Maina and another member of the robbery gang, Duane Owusu, in it.

Mobile phone analysis led police to the rest of the gang. When they arrested gang member Kobina Essel officers found a sports bag containing a white hooded top with Mr Simpson’s blood on it.

Yesterday the Matalan gang were convicted: Kobina Essel — known as "Aggro", 19, of East London, was found guilty of murder while Maina, of Canning Town, East London, and Randy Osei-Owusu, 17, of Poplar, East London, as well as Simeon Jumah, 25, were found guilty of manslaughter.

They had planned to steal between £20,000 and £30,000 in weekend takings from the store but fled empty-handed after the killing.

Jamie Simpson was stabbed three times, once in the back of the shoulder, once in the back and fatally to the left of the neck, the knife severing his carotid artery and jugular vein.

Colleagues tried to stem the flow with clothes and towels in the store but he was declared dead after ambulance staff arrived at the scene. Mr Simpson's mother described the killing of her son as a “sickening betrayal”.

Recalling the moment she was given the news, said: “It was like my world came to an end.”

She added: “He was my friend as well as my son. I couldn’t have asked for a better son. From when he was little he’s been my little buddy.”

Claire Simpson, 22, the victim’s sister, said in a statement that her brother's death was like losing a “vital organ”.

Jurors had been unable to agree on a murder charge against Maina, Jumah, and Osei-Owusu. It was only today, after prosecutors decided not to press for a retrial on that count, that the full extent of Maina’s violent past could be revealed.

The four killers and three others convicted of conspiracy to rob have been remanded in custody and are all due to be sentenced next month.

 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article7037396.ece

Does any of this surprise ANYone?

Morg
.

BNP - SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME.

Wigan and Leigh BNP, Wigan Patriot along with the rest of the BNP support our troops 110%

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27109477/Support-Our-Troops-Bring-Them-Home-Now

They needn't Die on Foreign Soil and be treated like scum when they come back Home, thanks to New Labours love-in with Militant Marxists and Islamists.

The Jackboots of the “Anti-Fascists”

British Police collude in UAF VIOLENCE.
This is the EDL/WDL/SDL being denied the "Right To Peaceful Protest" with the Cowardly MILITANT UAF/UNIONS allowed to attack anyone that the Lib/Lab/CON are scared of.
We know the BNP have PROSCRIBED the EDL, but we don't Subscribe to the New Labour POLITICISED STASI POLICE FORCE.

The denial of TRUTH by the BRITISH MEDIA.
The ENCOURAGED ATTACKS on anything differing from the Lib/Lab/CON.

"We’ve seen what happens when the people of Europe attempt to mount peaceful protests against the Islamization of their countries. They are vilified in the press and by government spokesmen, denounced as “fascists” and “racists”, and subjected to arbitrary arrests, interrogations, and whatever administrative punishments the authorities can cobble together under anti-incitement laws." [...]

"The authorities often find it helpful to use the AFA/Antifa organizations — anarchist groups that call themselves “anti-fascists” — to do the scuffling and breaking of heads, and thus permit official law enforcement to keep its hands fastidiously clean. In Britain the most prominent “anti-fascist” group is UAF, “United Against Fascism”. Their primary mission nowadays is to suppress the anti-jihad activists of the English Defence League, the Welsh Defence League, and the Scottish Defence League." [...]

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/02/jackboots-of-anti-fascists.html#readfurther

-----------------------------------------------------

Also Greater Manchester Police "LOCKED DOWN" Manchester City Centre over the weekend..
Further Evidence of POLICE STATE BRITAIN.

"A crackdown on drink-fuelled violence across Greater Manchester has seen 395 people arrested after a 24-hour blitz by police.

Operation Portcullis started early on Friday with a series of raids aimed at tracking down those suspected of drink-fuelled crime." ...

"A "lock down" in police terms is when officers control where people can go in a certain area in response to a specific risk, hazard or threat."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/8525873.stm

New Labours STASI STATE.

The PERSECUTION of EUROPES JEWS ?

THE TRUE FACE OF ISLAMIC INTERGRATION ?

We all know the True Face of RACISM and Anti-Semitic Attacks.
It's not the BNP that's for sure.

""This new hatred comes from Muslim immigrants. The Jewish people are afraid now." "...

"They also accuse Ilmar Reepalu, the Left-wing mayor who has been in power for 15 years, of failing to protect them. "...

""Some Swedish politicians are letting them do it, including the mayor. Of course the Muslims have more votes than the Jews." "



UAF....HELLO..ANYONE HOME ?
Looks the UAF are too busy supporting ISLAMIC ENRICHMENT ON OUR SOCIETY.

Rochdale
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUMlxDxIoTc

Yorkshire
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5LNdODpNDc&feature=related

Birmingham
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBr0H13jPx0&feature=related

Henry Webster
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPdbKXxs2BM&feature=related

Tony Ward
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/11/one-law-for-british-people-another-law-for-the-colonisers/

Islamists attacking Police in UK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbAdoD9LnQ8&feature=related

RELIGION OF PEACE MY AR*E.

But this is just my opinion.
TRUTH SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.
GEERT WILDERS anyone ?
"At a certain level, the trial of Geert Wilders for the crime of “group insult” of Islam is déjà vu all over again. For as the spokesperson for the Openbaar Ministerie put it, “It is irrelevant whether Wilders’s witnesses might prove Wilders’s observations to be correct. What’s relevant is that his observations are illegal.”"

Lockerbie bomber Megrahi living in luxury villa six months after being at 'death's door'

TREASON
Did we really expect anything else.
New labour...No policy's but plenty of Corruption, Treason, Genocide.

And the American Intelligence Service is going to do what to our Country ?
They won't be inclined to share any Intel about forthcoming Islamic Acts of Terrorism, Plots, Groups etc that are planning to Attack us.

What do you have to do to be consider a DANGER TO YOUR OWN COUNTRY AND PEOPLE ?

An Application For A Job At The Daily Mail

Despite desperate pleas from the coalition and a celebrity single called ‘Clocks (Time Stands Still As My Pint Falls To The Floor)’, which is a cover of the well known Coldplay song featuring Amy Winehouse, Shane Macgowan, William Shatner, David Hasselhoff and of course Bono. The Government feel they have no reason to inject cash into a fix up campaign started by the WPTC that aims to add, on average, 1cm of wood to each wonky table leg in every pub across the UK but say instead the much needed money will go into immigrant housing.

David Cameron and the Conservative party have said they oppose Labour’s stance but had to ask for clarification as to what a wonky table is. They were later heard saying “Oh the thing the butler would normally take care of” after somebody explained to them what the WPTC stood for.

The only real opposition is the BNP who have released this statement,

Once again this poor and out of touch government have chosen to ignore the severe difficulty everyday Britons go through, who just want a nice drink after working a shift having to put up with all the non white people and instead they choose to spend the money on IMMIGRANT housing. Before long the wonky tables wont even matter as all of our local beloved drinking establishments will be overrun with jobless money grabbers sponging off our taxes!

The BNP later confirmed the last part of that statement was about immigrants and not hard-working but unfortunate unemployed british citizens.

Mother of 8 and Big Brother star Chanise Jedward has also been raising awareness for the problem by releasing a sex tape where she can be seen being intimate with an unnamed stripper on top of a wonky table and later on in the film simulates oral sex with the tables short leg.

Her publicist Max Clifford said although ‘accidentally’ released 9 months ago the DVD will now be available legally and all profits will go to WPTC funding. It is believed she will be making a sequel and Prince Harry is rumoured to be in it.

A normal every day worker who is a member of the WPTC has told us exclusively, that they have big plans in the coming year including petitions, rally’s and superhero costumes to try and get the funding they are in dire need of. He also said “That moment of despair a drinker has when they realise their drink is spilling because of a wonky table is akin to the worse kind of terror threat or natural disaster and we will defeat the problem even if it means the government needs to cut NHS funds to help us!

ECONOMIC ILLITERACY

The economic disaster that faces our country is the fault of both the major parties. Unfortunately neither can see their culpability or what to do about it.
Our economy is a dire as that of Greece.
Brown suggests raising taxes and keeping public spending up while the Tories believe in drastic cuts in spending.
These two idiotic parties are tinkering with the results of their mismanagement rather than grasping the cause.
WE MAKE NOTHING.

I agree we should not have too drastic cuts as these will increase unemployment but the targets of government spending give no return on the spending.
They printed money to bail out the banks when it could be lent to industry at cheap rates to create jobs instead of subsidising the destruction of jobs by actions such as the loan to Kraft by the State owned RBS to enable them to close Cadbury factories.
At the same time they increased National Insurance which is a tax on jobs.
PC jobs such as diversity officers Government adverts, smoking sessation officers together with a host of quangos could be cut without any harm to the economy.
Foreign aid could be cut as well and don't get me started on the EU or illegal wars.

The Tories are no better as they agree with these latter causes but would cut services drastically to reduce the deficit.

We have millions on the dole. Can these idiots not devise a scheme to give them USEFUL work. There is so much that needs to be done to improve our country that it is criminal it is not tackled while people are on the dole or doing unecessary jobs.
That way we would have a return on our investments and a better country.

I believe that unnecessary bureaucracy and regulation should be cut. Business taxes and National insurance should also be cut to encourage firms to start MAKING THINGS thus creating jobs and finance arranged through a National Bank which would lend money at a realistic rate rather than financing bankers bonuses.

The countries which have not been affected so much by the recession and which are already out of it are countries with a strong manufacturing base. Our reliance on the parasites of the City of London has cost us dear.

It will be a hard slog to rebuild our country but until we take the necessary measures we will not achieve it.

Neither major party seems to know what to do or if they do they are so much in hock with the bankers and their millionaire bosses living in their offshore tax havens they will not dare to take the necessary action.
Our party is at present powerless to influence the inevitable decline and many will suffer as a result of the incompetence of these politicians.
We can only wait until the train hits the buffers which it will and people will realise we had the answers all the time.

EXPONENTIAL GROWTH

.
This is a topic that very few people understand. But it is vital that you DO understand it.

No, you don't need to understand all its mathematical details, but if you are to get a handle on the immigration problems facing you, then you need a general understanding of its consequences. This film will give you that.

Then you will understand why early action is vital.

About three or four years ago I gave a talk at a meeting about the demographics of Wigan over a spread of time, with projections into the future. Any reader who was at that meeting will now understand how I devised the diagrams I used and the conclusions I arrived at.

With the immigration problems we have, age groups are the key. The vital age group is 15yrs - 45yrs - the fighting age for men, the breeding age for women. The 0 - 15yrs age group is almost as important. Take some time to think about this.

If we wait until one third of the population comprises immigrants then we have only one generation (given childbirth differentials between natives and immigrants) before we are outnumbered two to one in the vital age group. We may still comprise an overall majority - but in this game we codgers don't matter. Don't look at snapshots - look at progress over time.



Morg
.

You can't trust anybody these days.

How have we gotten to the stage where Governments are colluding with scientists to manipulate the AGW/Climate Change data to fit an agenda, where scientists submit supposedly "PEER REVIEWED" fake reasearch on Pharmecuticals?

I was prescribed Celebrex for my arthritis in my knees, guess what...Celebrex did nothing.
££££ come before your Health, and if GlobeCorp Health (any large multinational/international privately owned monopoly such as Rupert Murdochs NewsCorp) need to tell a little fib, just to get the Medicine ball rolling, they won't hesitate.
It's not your Health they're interested but their bank balance.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"What's notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. It's not the fact that so-called "scientific" medical journals published his fabricated studies. It's not even the fact that the drug companies paid this quack close to half a million dollars while he kept on pumping out fabricated research.

The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry." ...

NaturalNews) It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals. Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study! Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway. It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal. As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted. After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine. He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. (http://www.theday.com/article/20100...)

Business as usual in Big Pharma

What's notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. It's not the fact that so-called "scientific" medical journals published his fabricated studies. It's not even the fact that the drug companies paid this quack close to half a million dollars while he kept on pumping out fabricated research. The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Reuben's actions really aren't that extraordinary. Drug companies bribe researchers and doctors as a routine matter. Medical journals routinely publish false, fraudulent studies. FDA panel members regularly rely on falsified research in making their drug approval decisions, and the mainstream media regularly quotes falsified research in reporting the news.
Fraudulent research, in other words, is widespread in modern medicine. The pharmaceutical industry couldn't operate without it, actually. It is falsified research that gives the industry its best marketing claims and strongest FDA approvals. Quacks like Dr Scott Reuben are an important part of the pharmaceutical profit machine because without falsified research, bribery and corruption, the industry would have very little research at all. Pay special attention to the fact that the Anesthesia & Analgesia medical journal gladly published Dr. Reuben's faked studies even though this journal claims to be a "scientific" medical journal based on peer review. Funny, isn't it, how such a scientific medical journal gladly publishes fraudulent research with data that was simply invented by the study author. Perhaps these medical journals should be moved out of the non-fiction section of university libraries and placed under science fiction. Remember, too, that all the proponents of pharmaceuticals, vaccines and mammograms ignorantly claim that their conventional medicine is all based on "good science." It's all scientific and trustworthy, they claim, while accusing alternative medicine of being "woo woo" wishful thinking and non-scientific hype. Perhaps they should have a quick look in the mirror and realize it is their own system of quack medicine that's based largely on fraudulent research, bribery and corruption. You just have to laugh, actually, when you hear pushers of vaccines and pharmaceuticals claim their medicine is "scientific" while natural medicine is "unproven." Sure it's scientific -- about as scientific as the storyline in a Scooby Doo cartoon, or as credible as the medical license of a six-year-old kid who just received a "let's play doctor" gift set for Christmas. Many pharmaceutical researchers would have better careers as writers of fiction novels rather than scientific papers. For all those people who ignorantly claim that modern pharmaceutical science is based on "scientific evidence," just give them these three words: Doctor Scott Reuben.

Drug companies support fraudulent research

Don't forget that the drug companies openly supported Dr. Scott Reuben's research. They paid him, in fact, to keep on fabricating studies. The drug companies claim to be innocent in all this, but behind the scenes they had to have known what was going on. Dr. Reuben's research was just too consistently favorable to drug company interests to be scientifically legitimate. If a drug company wanted to "prove" that their drug was good for some new application, all they had to do was ask Dr. Reuben to come up with the research (wink wink). "Here's another fifty thousand dollars to study whether our drug is good for post-surgical pain (wink)." And before long, Dr. Reuben would magically materialize a brand new study that just happened to "prove" exactly what the sponsoring drug company wanted to prove. Advocates of western medicine claim they don't believe in magic, but when it comes to clinical trials, they actually do: All the results they wish to see just magically appear as long as the right researcher gets paid to materialize the results out of thin air, much like waving a magician's wand and chanting, "Abra cadabra... let there be RESEARCH DATA!" Shazam! The research data materializes just like that. It all gets written up into a "scientific" paper that also magically gets published in medical journals that fail to ask a single question that might exposed the research fraud. I guess these people believe in magic after all, huh? Where science is lacking, a little "research magic" conveniently fills the void. The whole system makes a mockery of real science. It is a system operated by criminals who fabricate whatever "scientific evidence" they need in order to get published in medical journals and win FDA approval for drugs that they fully realize are killing people.

What is "Evidence-Based Medicine?"

The fact that a researcher like Dr. Reuben could so successfully fabricate fraudulent study data, then get it published in peer-reviewed science journals, and get away with it for 13 years sheds all kinds of new light on what's really behind "evidence-based medicine." The recipe for evidence-based medicine is quite simple: Fabricate the evidence! Get it published in any mainstream medical journal. Then you can quote the fabricated evidence as "fact!" When pushers of pharmaceuticals and vaccines resort to quoting "evidence-based medicine" as their defense, keep in mind that much of their so-called evidence has been entirely fabricated.
When they claim their branch of toxic chemical medicine is based on "real science," what they really mean is that it's based on fraudulent science but they've all secretly agreed to call it "real science." When they claim to have "scientific facts" supporting their position, what they really mean is that those "facts" were fabricated by criminal researchers being paid bribes by the drug companies. "Evidence-based medicine," it turns out, hardly exists anymore. And even if it does, how do you know which studies are real vs. which ones were fabricated? If a trusted, well-paid researcher can get his falsified papers published for 13 years in top-notch science journals -- without getting caught by his peers -- then what does that say about the credibility of the entire peer-review science paper publishing process? Here's what is says: "Scientific medicine" is a total fraud. And this fraud isn't limited to Dr Scott Reuben, either. Remember: he engaged in routine research fraud for 13 years before being caught. There are probably thousands of other scientists engaged in similar research fraud right now who haven't yet been caught in the act. Their fraudulent research papers have no doubt already been published in "scientific" medical journals. They've been quoted in the popular press. They've been relied on by FDA decision makers to approve drugs as "safe and effective" for widespread use. And yet underneath all this, there's nothing more than fraud and quackery. Sure, there may be some legitimate studies mixed in with all the fraud, but how can we tell the difference?
How are we to trust this system that claims to have a monopoly on scientific truth but in reality is a front for outright scientific fraud?

Keep up the great work, Dr Reuben

Thank you, Dr Scott Reuben, for showing us the truth about the pharmaceutical industry, the research quackery, the laughable "scientific" journals and the bribery and corruption that characterizes the pharmaceutical industry today. You have done more to shed light on the true nature of the drug industry than a thousand articles on NaturalNews.com ever could. Keep up the good work. After paying your fine and serving a little jail time, I'm sure your services will be in high demand at all the top drug companies that need yet more "scientific" studies to be fabricated and submitted to the medical journals. You may be a dishonest, disgusting human being to most of the world, but you're a huge asset to the pharmaceutical industry and they need you back! There are more studies that need to be fabricated soon; more false papers that need to be published and more dangerous drugs that need to receive FDA approval. Hurry! Because if there's one place that extreme dishonesty is richly rewarded, it's in the pharmaceutical industry, where poisons are approved as medicines and fiction is published as the truth. Sources for this story include: http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/... http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/01... http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicH... http://www.theday.com/article/20100...

IS THIS AN ELECTION YEAR?

You can always tell when its an election year in the Uk, as all the politicians smile as they stab you in the back while they remove your wallet. (Usually they frown) Anyway worried about how the general public will vote after the debacle with the MPs outlandish expenses claims and how so many people have said they will not vote.It appears that Labour has settled on getting the Muslim vote in which to ensure they spend another 5 years in power.

So we have seen the formerly ostracized Muslim council of Britain brought back into the fold. we have seen numerous court cases concerning Muslims where those in the dock have walked free such as:

Mohammed Atif Siddique
Three Muslims accused of murdering a Black man in Birmingham
Those idiots who wanted to behead a British soldier

We have an MP interceding on behalf of an man who stole £80,000 via benefit fraud, by writing a letter to the judge asking not to jail him because of the impact that might have on his health and family life.

And now we have the British PM instigating an inquiry into how the men who allegedly killed a Hamas leader used fake British Passports by demanding a word with the Israeli ambassador. But get this Brown quoted the following in his defense;

"We have to make sure everything is being done to protect [the British passport].

This from the man (and the party) who have given away hundreds of thousands of British passports to those who hate us. You know like those who aren't British but live here on benefits while hating everything about us.

Now it seems he is attacking Israel so as to garner a few brownie points with the Muslims who reside in the UK just to ensure that they vote for labour.

http://eye-on-the-world.blogspot.com/2010/02/british-labour-government-sucks-up-to.html

Morg

So yes, I suppose it must be an election year. Best come along to tonight's meeting then; we have things to talk about, council and general election candidates to settle, etc.

THAT Question Time transcript

.
So, Nick Griffin's dreams came true, and he got to appear on the real telly, with some real politicians.

And what a night it was. A glittering gallery of all the key figures, the big beasts, in British politics: MP Chris WhoHe of extremist minority party the "Lib Dems", Jack 'thought he'd retired?' Straw for Labour, Sayeeda WhoShe for Conservatives and Bonnie Greer, a random American writer, filling that vital role of black-person-sat-right-next-to-nasty-Nick-ha-ha.

Through his contacts with the BBC (you just press '1' on the remote), CF is able to bring you a full transcript of what was probably the most tedious controversial Question Time yet.

Dimbleby: "Good evening. I'd like to welcome our panel tonight. Well, all of them bar one, of course"
[audience laughs nervously]
Griffin: "I .."
[audience boos enthusiatically]
Dimblebore: "That's really quite enough from you, Mr Griffin"
[applause. Cries of 'quite right']
Dumbledore: "First, I must just apologise for the screaming and breaking glass you may be able to hear. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully stormed the building and are now peacefully smashing the place up".
Dumbledore: "..and so, to our first question. Gentleman with the cross face.."
Angry Asian: "Nick. Is it that you love Churchill and hate Muslims, innit?"
[wild applause, jeering]
Griffin: "I didn't ..."
Baroness Wassup [interrupting]: "Yes, you do, don't you, you do"
[prolonged applause]
Dumbledore: "Moving on now. I've got photos, Mr Griffin, of you standing near a man from the Klu Klux Klan. Does the very existence of these photo's not prove, beyond doubt, that you'd very much like to strap a black man to the front of your pickup and drive all round the bayou at high speed?"
Griffin: "Well, I ..."
Bonnie Greer [interrupting]: "Don't you try to tell me about no KKK. I'm a 'merican."
[rapturous applause, cries of 'Right on', 'mmm hmmm']
Dumbledore: "I must just apologise for the smoke the audience may be able to smell. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully ripped open the filing cabinets, piled up all the scripts and books in the building, and set light to them".
Dimblebore: "..and now, for another question"
Lone non-nutter in audience: "Is it not possibly the case that some of our problems with immigration stem from Labour's policies in this area?"
[audience falls silent, confused]
Chris WhoHe: "What? Is it me? Sorry. What was the question?"
Jack Straw: "I'd like to answer that by reading out a long list of Labour's achievements, allowing the audience to refill their glasses and go to the toilet."
Baroness WhoShe: "Well that's not true is it, and ..."
Dimbleby [interrupting]: "I'm sorry, we'll have to move on. Mr Griffin is just sitting there, smiling, and no-one has booed him for nearly five minutes"
[applause, booing]
Dumbledore: "Moving on. Mr Griffin, I've got a puppy in this bag. Very cute. But it's a black puppy. Am I right in thinking that you, and members of your odious party, would like to kick it to death and then eat it?"
Griffin: "Well, that would be illegal and.."
Straw [interrupting]:: "As a member of the Government, and a Justice Minister, can I just say that I would be more than happy to change the law, right now, if I felt that it would make you look bad, Mr Griffin, or indeed make me look better."
[applause, shouts of 'go on Jack']
Dimmock: "..and so to another question. You sir, what would you like to ask the panel?"
Teenager: "Hey, Mr Griffin: instead of calling you Nick, I call you Dick"
[thunderous applause, teenager high-fived by all in the next row]
Dumbledore: "I must just apologise for the triumphant howling you may be able to hear. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully killed a BBC security guard, and are parading his head on a pole around the car park".
Dimbley:"..but now, time for one more question, and perhaps on a slightly different topic. You, sir.."
Angry black man: "Griffin, Why don't you fuck off to the Antarctic? it's all white there"
[hysterical laughter, applause, cries of 'yeah!']
Dimbleby: "Well, I'm afraid that's all we've got time for tonight. Some pretty impressive, incisive debate this evening, I think you'll agree. And to the audience, I would ask you to leave by the western exit, as the UAF have peacefully brought down a police helicopter in the eastern carpark, and are currently hacking the occupants to death with machetes. Goodnight!"
[applause, music, lights fade]

http://constantlyfurious.blogspot.com/2010/02/that-nick-griffin-question-time.html 

Morg
.

PEOPLE AND PRINCIPLE.

.
"Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt Government risks harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker, but only to give the moral cowards an excuse to think nothing at all." Michael Rivero

Morg
.

Ali Dizeai CORRUPT ASIAN COP.

THE BLACK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION LEADER FOUND GUILTY OF CORRUPTION.
This is the thin edge of the wedge. New Labour have been placing Foreign Nationals in position of power. The Bill Of Rights should be bought in and all Non-Ethnic Brits denied a vote in any Local or General Election on the British Mainland. IMHO.

ADOPTATERR 'R' US

A lady Canadian libertarian wrote a lot of letters to the government, complaining about the treatment of  captive insurgents (terrorists) being held in  Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities. She received back the following reply:


National Defence Headquarters
MGen George R. Pearkes Bldg, 15 NT
101 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa , ON K1 A 0K2  Canada

Dear Concerned Citizen,

Thank you for your recent letter expressing your profound concern of treatment of the Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists captured by Canadian Forces who were subsequently transferred to the Afghanistan Government and are currently being held by Afghan officials in Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities.

Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinions were heard loud and clear here in  Ottawa . You will be pleased to learn, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself; we are creating a new department here at the Department of National Defense, to be called 'Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers' program, or L.A.R.K. For short.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to divert one terrorist and place him in your personal care. Your personal detainee has been selected and is scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence in  Toronto next Monday. Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. It will likely be necessary for you to hire some assistant caretakers.. We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommend in your letter.

Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his 'attitudinal problem' will help him overcome these character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counseling and home schooling.

Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills at your next yoga group. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this might offend him. 

Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters (except sexually) since he views females as a subhuman form of property. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known to show violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure you will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka over time. Just remember that it is all part of 'respecting his culture and religious beliefs' as described in your letter.

Thanks again for your concern. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job and care for our fellow man. You take good care of Ahmed and remember, we'll be watching. Good luck and God bless you.

Cordially,
Gordon O'Connor
Minister of National Defense.

THOUGHTS ON TODAY'S NEWS

Watching the news today on Afganistan a thought came to me. The Afgans do not seem to be very diverse and yet the soldiers are very careful not to offend their traditions and seek to bring local police in to help them. They seek to reassure the locals that their traditions would be respected "winning hearts and minds" they call it. A vibrant multicultural society is never mentioned.

Now we should not be there but I can understand the Afgan people's resentment to these foreigners (our soldiers) in their country.
It would be nice if our politicians would win our hearts and minds and ask us whether we wanted to be vibrant and diverse. The local British people (us) have never been consulted but usually villified as racist when (if we dare) we state we were quite happy with the former make up of our society.



Which brings me to my next point. The CH4 programme of MPs living in tower blocks.
These monstrosities seem to be mainly inhabited by people alien to our country and riven with violence,very diverse. Yes there were some decent people in them but to have to live with their antisocial neighbours must be a nightmare.I could just about manage on the meager benefits but to have to live side by side with most of the people featured on this programme would make me want to top myself.


I feel for our people who have to do so and it's no good MPs shedding crocodile tears when they are responsible for this destruction of our society.
The white kids in Hull had no chance as they had been let down by the poor education system and a centre showing them how to put condoms on or write CVs will not help them escape poverty.
The money would be better spent on apprenticeships and other training or these lads will have no future as all our industries requiring unskilled workers have been sent abroad BY THESE POLITICIANS.
All in all a sad representation of a society broken by political correctness, immigration and incompetence.


The last bit of news I saw was Cameron's idea to make job centres, teaching and social services into workers Co-ops.
What a stupid idea. Yes co-ops are a good incentivisers for firms with a saleable end product but a job centre co-op?. How would that work?


The only incentive would be for the workers to do as little as possible as these are services and there is no paid end product. Or are they wanting to privatise them?
Admittedly these services are not efficient, but that is because all orders come down from on high (Whitehall) and management is poor with no appreciation accorded for good work.

The answer is for them to be managed locally by integrated teams who have pride in their work and a good team spirit, something that Whitehall can not understand.
So there we have it. Another daft gimmick from the useless Cameron.
A few weeks work in a proper job would probably educate him as to what motivates people.

THE EQUALITIES COMMISSION RULING

Well it's done. The new constitution has been passed and hopefully will be accepted by the Equalities Commission.
I have a feeling they may still try to find fault with it as their prime cause is to destroy our party and is nothing to do with "race". However with luck it will go through and we will be able to get on with the job of promoting our policies.

There are some who have stated their intention to flood us with people to undermine and destroy us. We must and will be careful not to allow this to happen.

To be a member new applicants will have to agree with our core beliefs (if they do so fine)but if they do not subscribe to our principles they could not logically be members, just as Communists would not be allowed in the Tory Party as they have different ideologies or are supposed to.

Also to before weilding any voting power new members would have to prove themselves by working for the Party and attending schools as we do now. It will not be as easy therefore as these potential destroyers think. You do not have to be black or Asian to try to destroy us. There have been many attempts in the past by white people which have been thwarted and the destroyers thrown out of the Party.

I do not think the ruling will damage us and may indeed help our cause in the long term, if we are careful.

Our core policy remains and will remain THE PROTECTION OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE in our own land and any ruling of the Equalities Commission will not alter that.

THE MORALITY OF SURVIVAL

.
This is a long read - but is still only fragments of the original. I recommend you read the original, which can be found HERE

"[The West] has not yet understood that whites, in a world become too small for its inhabitants, are now a minority and that the proliferation of other races dooms our race, my race, irretrievably to extinction in the century to come, if we hold fast to our present moral principles." -- Jean Raspail, "The Camp Of The Saints"

The loss of racial identity in the Western world is symptomatic of a deeper crisis within the European peoples, whose culture and technology have provided the world with much of what we know today as modern civilization. At its core, the crisis is the inevitable consequence of a profound, and perhaps fatal, misunderstanding of the nature of morality. We have lost sight of ancient and eternal laws of Nature on which our civilization must be based if we are to survive. We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist altruistic principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have driven us to the brink of ruin.

Demographic projections based on American and European immigration policies, as well as the evidence of one's own senses as one walks the streets of any large Western city, point to a bleak future. Within a century or two, perhaps less, the peoples of the West, those whose ancestry derives from the Nordic and Alpine subraces of Europe, will have ceased to exist as a cohesive entity. How quickly the end will come depends on immigration rates, differential birthrates among ethnic groups, and mixed-race childbearing rates. But the final outcome is fixed so long as we adhere to our present course.

And yet, frank discussion of the outcome, the submergence of the race that produced the world's first, and perhaps only technological civilization, is usually silenced with words like "racist," "bigot," and "xenophobe." Neither the flawed moral system that enforces this silence nor the people who support it will outlive the demise of the West. But when the West is gone, it will be of little consolation that those responsible will have expired as well. If we are to reverse course, it is vital that we take steps now, before it is too late.

If, today, the West's moral system is flawed, how can it be corrected? The first question we must ask is whether it is moral for ethnic groups as well as individuals to seek survival. And if so, what are the moral actions we may undertake to secure survival? What must be the moral basis of our civilization if it is not to be lost? In his book, "Destiny of Angels", Richard McCulloch calls these questions a matter of "ultimate ethics."

As biologist Garrett Hardin demonstrated in his 1982 essay, "Discriminating Altruisms," universalism--a chimerical One World without borders or distinctions--is impossible. Groups that practice unlimited altruism, unfettered by thoughts of self-preservation, will be disadvantaged in life's competition and thus eliminated over time in favor of those that limit their altruistic behavior to a smaller subset of humanity, usually their own genetic kin, from whom they receive reciprocal benefits.

"[W]e must not forget that for three billion years, biological evolution has been powered by discrimination. Even mere survival in the absence of evolutionary change depends on discrimination. If universalists now have their way, discrimination will be abandoned. Even the most modest impulse toward conservatism should cause us to question the wisdom of abandoning a principle that has worked so well for billions of years. It is a tragic irony that discrimination has produced a species (homo sapiens) that now proposes to abandon the principle responsible for its rise to greatness." It is to the advantage of non-Europeans, virtually all of whom retain their cohesion as distinctive, discriminating groups, to exploit the economic wealth and social order of the West, benefits many demonstrably cannot create for themselves. When this cohesive drive is placed in competition with self-sacrificing Western altruism, there can be only one outcome. In the near term, Europeans will be displaced by groups acting in their own self-interest. In the long run, biological destruction awaits us. Since those who displace us do not, by definition, maintain our moral standards -- for if they did, they would not be replacing us -- our flawed moral system will vanish with us.

The fact that universal, self-sacrificing altruism destroys its practitioners is its most obvious flaw. Any survivable moral order must recognize this.

People of European ancestry constitute something over ten percent of the world's population, but since 1980, white births amount to only a little more than five percent of the world's new children.

The birth rate in the West has fallen to dangerously low levels, now about 1.8 children per woman. A level of 2.1 is required to balance deaths. Birth rates in the third world remain very high, thanks in large measure to the infusion of Western food, medicine, and "peacekeeping."

The passing of any race is an event of great significance. The destruction of an entire population is, in fact, genocide by the definitions of the UN Genocide Convention, which defines genocide as ". . . the destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial or national group. The acts so defined include. . . the destruction of the conditions of life necessary for the physical existence of the group . . . ."

The debate about race must be framed in these terms in order to convey its true importance. The battle cannot be won by allowing the other side to limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion. The consequences are too important.

Over time, kin selection has resulted in a dual code of morality, an altruistic code for one's genetic kin and a non-altruistic code for everyone else. Anthropologists have suggested that humans evolved through a process of migration and tribal warfare between groups composed of genetically related individuals. In "A New Theory of Human Evolution", Sir Arthur Keith wrote:

    "The process which secures the evolution of an isolated group of humanity is a combination of two principles . . . namely, cooperation with competition . . . . I hold that from the very beginning of human evolution the conduct of every local group was regulated by two codes of morality, distinguished by Herbert Spencer as the `code of amity' and the `code of enmity'."

Garrett Hardin writes:

    "The essential characteristic of a tribe is that it should follow a double standard of morality--one kind of behavior for in-group relations, another for out-group."

In-group relations are characterized by cooperation while out-group relations are characterized by conflict. Liberals have tried to discredit the role of tribal conflict, claiming that such distinctions have been lost as groups reached nation size. But in so doing, they miss the vital message of genetic similarity theory. National ethnic groups represent the growth and consolidation of genetically related tribes over time.

Professor Hardin argues that, because of the nature of altruism and competition, the dual code of morality is inescapable and cannot be eliminated from human society:

    "In the absence of competition between tribes the survival value of altruism in a crowded world approaches zero because what ego gives up necessarily . . . goes into the commons. What is in the commons cannot favor the survival of the sharing impulses that put it there--unless there are limits placed on sharing. To place limits on sharing is to create a tribe--which means a rejection of One World. . . . A state of One World, if achieved, would soon redissolve into an assemblage of tribes."

The in-group out-group distinction still operates today; it is only the battleground that has shifted. Tribal warfare has been replaced by territorial irredentism and competing birthrates.

The liberal campaign to eliminate feelings of national, cultural, or racial solidarity among Western peoples was undertaken largely in the hope that the abolition of "tribalism" would inaugurate an era of world peace. As Professor Hardin has shown, tribalism cannot be eliminated. Worse still, any idealistic group that unilaterally dismantles its own tribal sense will be swept away by groups that have retained theirs. Unless the current direction is changed, the West will be destroyed in this new form of biological warfare.

The dual code of morality is therefore the cornerstone on which any enduring moral order must be based. It is also an answer to the question of ultimate ethics posed earlier: "Is it moral for ethnic groups to seek to survive?" Since it is impossible to eliminate "tribes" from the human race, the answer to this question must be yes. That which is built inextricably into the laws of the universe cannot be immoral.

Universalists might try to caricature the dual code of morality as an invidious double standard, but it is something we practice every day without even thinking about it. Without it, no group, be it a family, club, corporation, political party, nation, or race would exist. It is how groups distinguish between members and non-members. Employees of the same company treat each other differently from the way they treat competitors. Members of the same political party cooperate with each other and run against opponents. Families draw sharp distinctions between members and strangers. It is easy to overlook the dual code of morality precisely because it is so fundamental a part of human nature.

The "code of amity, code of enmity" explains racial loyalties. It is an extension of the biologically necessary fact that parents love their children more than the children of strangers. Such feelings are normal and natural. Yet "racism" has become the curse-word that stops discussion. Those who use the word as a weapon say that racial loyalty is racism when exhibited by whites but is justifiable pride when exhibited by non-whites. The word is simply a means of gaining power over people who have exaggerated moral scruples.

Most forms of behavior (by whites) that are characterized as racism do not involve unprovoked assault on people of other races, but are simply the natural loyalty of humans for their own group. They are necessary for survival. Unprovoked violence is a moral evil, but by all statistical measures, whites are overwhelmingly the victims of crimes of racial violence, not the perpetrators.

Blacks are twelve percent of the population but commit almost two-thirds of the violent crime in America, are over twelve times more likely to murder whites than the reverse, are more than _a thousand times_ more likely to rape white women than the reverse, and choose whites as crime victims fifty percent of the time compared to whites choosing blacks as victims only two percent of the time.

Interracial crime is just one manifestation of a fundamental biological principle called Gause's Law of Exclusion. In his book, "The Mammals of North America", University of Kansas biology professor Raymond Hall states the law as follows: "Two subspecies of the same species do not occur in the same geographic area."  One will inevitably eliminate or displace the other. Prof. Hall specifically includes humans in this rule: "To imagine one subspecies of man living together on equal terms for long with another subspecies is but wishful thinking and leads only to disaster and oblivion for one or the other."
 
The Map of Freedom, published annually by Freedom House, graphically demonstrates that free forms of government generally track population concentrations of people of European descent, a strong suggestion that freedom has a genetic origin. Although there are exceptions, notably Japan, which lost a nuclear war to the West and had a Western constitution imposed on it, the world of the free is largely the world of the Western European. The partially free include newly emerged Eastern Europeans and a scattering of other nations around the world. Much of Africa and Asia remains in the not free category.

Thomas Jefferson foresaw this. Fearing "importation of foreigners," he wrote in "Notes on Virginia", "They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, or if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as usual, from one extreme to the other. . . . In proportion to their number, they will infuse into it [the nation] their spirit, warp or bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."

If today's ethnic minorities become a majority it will be beyond the power of Western peoples to control, peacefully by means of the ballot, the destiny of the nations that were once their own. There is no guarantee that protections prevalent in Western societies will be preserved in societies that become non-Western.

There is no historical reason to believe that governments based on principles of individual liberty will survive the disappearance of Western peoples.

Post-colonial Africa is enlightening. For the most part, the Dark Continent is reverting to its ancestral ways, suitably updated by the infusion of Western weapons, as evidenced by carnage in Somalia and Rwanda. That this disturbs our heightened Western sense of compassion is understandable. But sentimentality should not blind us to the long term implications for our own survival. Nature's books are being balanced in Africa, and they will be balanced in the West, either by us or by Nature itself. Just as giving food to people who cannot feed themselves simply hastens an inevitable population crash, bringing third world people into the West simply hastens the transformation of the West into an extension of the third world.

The European tradition of ordered, self-governing liberty is probably part of our genetic heritage. Throughout the third world, governments range from anarchy to dictatorship. That too, is surely genetic. Those few non-European countries that appear to be free have generally maintained democracy through intimate contact with the West. If Europeans are marginalized and ultimately absorbed by the third world, the idealism of Western liberalism that permitted the third world invasion will have proved to be a lethal genetic flaw.

Few concepts are more ingrained in Western thought than respect for the "rule of law." The West has a history of order that predates the eight-hundred-year-old Magna Carta. Roman Law was supreme in the Mediterranean world for nearly a thousand years. Unique among the peoples of the earth, the people of the West recognize, at least in theory, the subordination of government to individual rights. But laws have been instrumental in bringing on the current crisis. Although there is virtually no popular support for immigration in the Western world, it is everywhere proceeding under laws passed by governments elected by the people.

In the end, laws are no better at ensuring liberty than the people who make and enforce them. Sir Roger L'Estrange said, "The greatest of all injustice is that which goes under the name of law."
People cannot, by any agreement, deprive their posterity of rights. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum on which rests the case that immigration is genocide. The governments of the West have no right to impose present levels of immigration and race mixing on their people. Nor are we morally bound to accept them.

The only course that gives cohesive groups a chance to survive is ethnic separation. Without separation, the dual code of morality will ensure a long, chaotic period of strife and bloodshed. Eventually, what racial conflict does not finish, miscegenation, diminished birthrates, and physical and psychological displacement will. Personal liberty and individuality, without which Europeans simply cannot exist, will disappear long before the European genetic heritage is completely submerged. Lest this outcome seem remote and therefore of no concern, let the time scale of Rome's decline be always kept in mind. Though those reading this may or may not live to see the collapse of the West, the white children being born today may well suffer it.

Louis Veuillot, the 19th century French writer, captured the dilemma facing the West in confronting peoples who do not conform to Western moral principles. "When I am the weaker, I ask you for my freedom, because that is your principle; but when I am the stronger, I take away your freedom, because that is my principle." The West must recognize this appeal for compassion by "the wretched refuse of [the non-Western world's] teeming shore," for what it is: a form of beguiling parasitism that can, by definition, only seduce those with Western moral principles.

In "The Decline of the West", Oswald Spengler wrote, "One grows or dies. There is no third possibility." The peoples of the West must come to believe in and act in accordance with the only moral principle Nature recognizes: for those who live in harmony with Nature, _survival is moral_. For those who do not, the penalty is extinction. Without this understanding, Western Man, progenitor of law, compassion, technology and a spirit of quest that is unparalleled in the history of the human race, will perish at the hands of those who do not possess the same innate spark. For the sake of our children who are yet to be, let us choose life--by whatever means we must--while the choice is still ours.

http://www.crusader.net/texts/bt/bt09.html 


Morg
.