MUCH MORE TO UNEARTH

How convenient. The BNP website is off line following the Panorama programme.
I know it is a bit soon for a comment but the inability to get on the site is to say the least strange.
have they run away as Nick did in Leicester?
Having seen the programme I was a little disappointed at its shallowness. It did not unearth much that we did not already know, so why all the fuss about it on the official site?

It was said that donations reached record levels and so did expenditure, but no details of that expenditure were discovered.
I feel there is a lot more to it still hidden.

I am and always have been a nationalist but feel cheated in not being given the answers to valid questions of on what this vast amount of money was spent. Questioning the finances is not treachery, it is a reasonable request for answers which I had hoped the programme would have elucidated.
It did not. All it showed was a culture of misaccounting and possibe fraud but no clue as to where our money has gone.
Possibly criminal charges will be brought, I don't know but the members deserve to know where their money has gone.
None of it came to our group. We put far more in the kitty than we got out.

Unfortunately the image of the party and thus of nationalism was dragged down by the disgraceful tactics at the aborted interview in Leicester, especially when the reporters were ejected from the venue. Those involved looked like and acted like the thugs we are portrayed as and this is the image we must lose.
The venue incidentally was where our last conference was held.

I have to say that those who consented to be interviewed conducted themselves in exemplary fashion and would be an asset to any patriotic party( apart from the traitor Bennett). Of course they are not members of the BNP now although they formerly held senior positions before leaving in disgust.
Their politics I am sure remain the same but the party hierarchy has let them and our nation down and those remaining in the party showed their true calibre.

I feel it is a pity that Andrew Brons did not appear on the programme as he would have shown the real BNP and countered the uncouth attitude of those still loyal to Nick Griffin.

I can only hope for a more in depth scrutiny of the Party and its finances in the future.

Is this tame programme what they were frightened of?
If so there must be much more lieing under the carpet.

Let's put all this deceit and corruption behind us and work for a clean honest Nationalist grouping which unites all true Brits.

WE OWE IT TO OUR COUNTRY.

THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING.

As Winter approaches we look back to the barbecue summer due to global warming which confounded the "experts" by not turning up.

We can also celebrate "The Arab Spring" when the peoples of North Africa gained their freedom and could live in harmony, also predicted by the experts and supported by our government at a cost of billions in Libya.
It is wonderful to see the newly freed people of Tunisia enjoying their freedom by attempting to escape to Europe.
The harmony in Libya in those areas liberated fron Gadaffi gladdens ones heart and it must make Cameron proud that the captured soldiers are at last seeing the benefits of democracy.

Oh sorry there must have been a mistake. The sub Saharan Africans who fought for Gadaffi are not facing trial but murder by being shot if they are lucky and by torture and mutilation if they are not.
This is not racist of course, only whites can be racist.

Egypt, freed of Mubarak has settled down to peace and should have free elections where all races and religions are treated equally, provided they are muslims.
How lucky the Coptic Christians are to live in a predominently muslim society, the religion of peace whose adherents kill them and burn their churches with the connivance of the democratic military dictators.

I realise that Coptic Christianity was the original religion long before the armies of the religion of peace arrived, but turning the other cheek has really helped them and hastened their eradication. It shows their religion is "not fit for purpose" and must therefore be suppressed.

As he basks in the sucess of a well thought out policy Cameron would do well to observe the turmoil in other Middle East countries, favoured by islamic inhabitants and see how that knowledge could affect our country.

His party and the previous Labour Party have seeded our towns with rapidly growing areas, mini caliphates who represent the religion of peace and wish only to take over the rest of the country by peaceful means such as breeding.

If Cameron and his cronies just allow this to happen all will be peaceful and harmonious. He will of course have to silence those "bigots" who wish to retain their non peaceful democratic way of life by leafletting and doing table tops.
Perhaps these misguided people who foolishly resist will have to be peacefully deported or even executed.

But that is the penalty for resisting these peaceful follwers of the prophet what's his name? who can not be depicted in pictorial fashion.
He was brought up among camels in the desert and thus knew everything about camels and sand but little else, just the man to peacefully start a new religion by slaughtering others and just the man for God to talk to and make rules for us all.

The prophet and God have spoken and it is our duty to obey.

PEACE.

WHY IS NEW MONEY GOING TO THE BANKS?

Over the last few days I have been thinking about and reading in the papers about the latest 70 billion Quantitative Easing (printing of money) which has been decided by Mervyn King.

This amounts to over £1000 for every person in Britain. It is not extra money he has given us, it is a debt he has saddled us with. Most affected are those with private pension schemes which have seen their pensions fall by as much as thirty percent.
In effect their pensions have been stolen.

I accept something drastic has to be done to save our country and provide jobs and if some sacrifices MUST be made we will all have to accept them.

BUT it is the way the money will be introduced which I can not understand.
It will be all channelled through ,you guessed it the bankers who caused much of the problem in the past.

Why could this "new money" not be used to improve our infrastructure or lent directly by the government to small firms at low interest? We would then get some return on this "investment" and our sacrifices, increase employment and in the end get a return on that money.
Then perhaps it would be worth it but it seems this new money created out of thin air will just boost the bank's balance sheets and the bosses bonuses.

I accept I am not an economist but the results of our country being ruled at the whim of these "experts" have been little short of disasterous.
So I ask the question. Why can the money not be put directly into the economy, businesses and infrastructure etc?

Why do the banks need to be involved at all?

Perhaps there are government forces controlling us, our economy and prospects behind the scenes which act in their interests and not in the national interest. It seems so.

Can anybody who knows how the finance world works please enlighten me? because I can see no logic in the way they are conducting our economy and our country?

I do not understand it. Does anybody?

If you do please tell me.

A FINANCIAL LIFELINE?

Yet another attack on the BBC and Panorama features on the party website.
This is getting a bit repititious and boring.

BUT there may be a way of benefitting from the "lies" which we are told are to be broadcast.

We could do as others quoted in todays article on the website and SUE the BBC for defamation of persons in the Party.
As has been shown thousands of pounds have been paid out for false accusations and libels in the past and our Chairman could do the same.

Think what a case he could make when he refuted the lies that he believes will be told about him.

He of course will know this as a lawyer, and he has vast experience of lawcourts as Chairman of the Party.

I am sure he will relish the opportunity to take the BBC to the cleaners and will be waiting with eager anticipation for the programme.
When these lies are broadcast he will be on them like a ton of bricks and have them in court for thousands in damages.

Will this programme solve the party's financial problems? It could.

I HOPE SO.

A Conversation About Race.........Again.

The following documentary trailer has been shown before on this blog but is always worthy of viewing and recent post contributions on here has prompted me to show it again:

The film actually goes head to head with the taboo subject of racism and gets the white-liberal and Afro-American squirming when confronted with some interesting facts and figures:

Yes, it's an American film but all the characteristics of this film are identical to the issues we are confronted with here in the UK.



The full length version of the film can be viewed by clicking on the link: A Conversation About Race.

A SQUALID FUTURE?

Tonight I watched a programme on Channel Four about the conditions in South Africa "post democracy" presented by that good British man Krishnan Gurumurthy, or something like that.

I can well understand why he was sent to report on conditions as a white man would have been in fear of his life in the shanty towns he visited.

The appalling squalour of the shanty towns he visited with rubbish, open sewers everywhere was a demonstration of typical African life.

One may wonder with what these people would have made their rudimentary shelters of if corrugated iron had not been invented by a British man in the 1820s. Perhaps they would have lived in true native ethnic style in mud huts.
Given the channel it was on, and the presenter with sympathy to the people suffering, the level of corruption and danger to the inhabitants from violent burglary was horrendous.

One woman was even afraid to go to the toilet at night (although I would think a visit in the day would have been wished to be avoided).
Possibly too many Africans about, that was the danger. I'm sure the whites would not have dared to set foot in those slums.
There was blatant corruption in the allocation of houses and profiteering by political heavyweights formerly of the "democratic ANC"

There was also a noticeable absence of men and those who were still there seemed to have done little to improve their neighbourhood.

Squalid though it was townships such as this are ubiquitous all over Africa and are shown in adverts requesting donations for help.
Cameron pledges millions of our money (not his and he has plenty) to help these people.

A question.
Could all this squalour and poverty in a wealthy country blessed by gold diamonds and coal and good land not be in some little way be the fault of their inhabitants?

Could the poverty and squalour in ALL other African countries also richly endowed with natural resources, be in a small way the fault of the inhabitants? After all many of our financial woes are blamed on the native British people.

Yes these people are poor. So were our people 100 years ago and our housing poor (I notice the slum dwellers all had mobile phones) but our streets were not covered in rubbish and we had a semblence of order and progress.

We had local councils who organised the improvement of our communities.
Our bureaucracies, although not perfect were not riven by corruption and our forefathers built a better land for their descendants.

Now areas of our large cities are receeding into crime and antisocial behaviour where knife and gun crime are on the increase. Native British people have left these areas in the process known as "white flight"
These areas in the main are populated by people of African descent who have moved here for various legitimate or other reasons. They are "celebrated" by the proponents of "diversity" as bringing a"vibrancy" to our land.

Of course the origins and ethnic make up of these new colonisers of our cities have nothing to do with increased crime levels

OR HAVE THEY? Is it in the genes?
A cursory look at the worldwide statistics would suggest so.

IS THIS THE FUTURE WHICH BECKONS OUR DESCENDANTS?

A THREE ONE WIN FOR NICK

Nick, your obsession with the forthcoming Panorama is beginning to seem pathological.
Why not let it drop and see what they say?

Your letter to the BBC on today website was a very good letter and the best response so far to whatever accusations you think they may make.

You still concentrate on financial issues and other employment matters of which most people neither know nor care about.

BUT you did land some good knockout punches at the BBC regarding their bias and general promotion of alien inhabitants of our country while excluding the views of our party who represent the indiginous inhabitants.

Why did you not do this before?
Why did you react as if you were on the ropes?

We know the BBC are lefty multiculturalists. Everybody does.

They have the power and almost a monopoly. We will never compete with them by running away. If we do that they will portray us in an even worse light and we can do little about it.
We could have used them to our advantage, but can not do that if we don't talk to them.

It is time we stopped running away and proclaimed our beliefs with pride. That way we will gain the support we are now losing.

There is a hunger in the British people for a competent movement to represent them, and we are not now providing that vehicle.

"Operation Fightback"? At present it seems like operation running away.

Stand firm Nick. Answer the questions honestly and get a competent management and policy system in place and we and the country will back you.

But the organisation and methods will have to change.

I'll give you a three one on the letter to Mark Thompson of the BBC

Keep it up.