Britons accused of trying to join Somali militants

The truth of this is not that BRITONS are trying to join Somali militants but BANGLADESHIS who, like anyone from the third world who come to our country are instantly given a BRITISH PASSPORT.

Why BANGLADESHIS who have BANGLADESHI passports need or are given a BRITISH passport is beyond me.
Now that these men have been caught it won't be long before they are sent back home. No, not to Bangladesh but back to OUR HOME and OUR LAND which it seems we have no say in who can come here, who can stay and who can't.

We can't even deport foreigners who have taken part in mass murder and genocide, paedophilia, rape and a 1000 other crimes which would see a NATIVE BRITON in a foreign country imprisoned and then deported back home.

"In recent months, MI5 and MI6 have become aware of an increasing number of young British men arriving in the African country in order to cross into Somalia, sources told The Daily Telegraph.

In Somalia, they have been joining up with al-Shabaab, a terrorist group linked to al-Qaeda in East Africa and there are concerns that they could return to Britain to launch attacks.

The latest arrests involved three men who were detained for questioning in the port of Mombasa last week.

Ambrose Munyasia, head of Kenya’s Coast Province police force, said: “They were seen acting suspiciously. We trailed them for a day after suspecting their movement within the town. Although they told us that they are tourists, some of their actions have given us cause to believe that they are not.”

Three suspected British al-Shabaab members were arrested in north east Kenya in May.

The men were of Bangladeshi origin but holding British passports, according to reports.

They were arrested when the Land Rover they were travelling in was stopped at a police checkpoint on a road linking Kenya and Somalia.

Philip Ndolo, the North Eastern regional deputy police chief, said the suspects claimed to be heading for the tourist island of Lamu, thousands of miles from where they were picked up.

He said investigations showed that the three used complex routes to avoid police checkpoints to get to the village where they were eventually arrested.

In November 2002 terrorists tried to shoot down an Israeli-chartered Boeing 757, firing two missiles which narrowly missed the plane as it took off from Mombasa airport and killing 15 people in a bomb explosion at the nearby Paradise Hotel."

A team of specialist forensic officers were examining laptops belonging to the suspects, sources said.

Kenyan counter-terrorism police were said to have become suspicious about the men and tracked their movements before arresting them on Thursday.

NON NURSING NURSES

The head of the Royal College of Nursing has suggested that visiting times in Hospitals should be relaxed so that relatives can help with simple nursing tasks such as feeding patients and toiletting.
This demonstrates the degree to which the NHS has sunk and typifies what is wrong with the nursing "profession".

Over the last 20 years or so nursing has become a proffession demanding it seems, a degree no doubt placing great stress on important subjects such as gender, ethnic and cultural requirements.
In addition computer proficiency and the correct form filling will be taught.
This of course will leave little time for nursing, the TLC of making sure patients are fed and comfortable and not left in soiled beds.

That all is well on the wards can be seen every day on visits to relatives.
The university trained nurses of course will be there, sitting round a computer screen in between chatting among themselves. Being highly educated one can not expect them do do anything so demeaning as actual nursing. In any case there is not time for menial tasks such as this as forms have to be filled in and equality and diversity targets met.

The nursing functions are left to untrained staff, often from the third world who if patients are lucky can actually speak English. Some care, many don't and patients are often neglected.

Ward cleanliness, previously of paramount importance has often been contracted out and is performed in a desultary inefficient manner often by foreigners brought in on the cheap from third world country slums to whom sterility and cleanliness is an alien concept.

The matrons of old would have a fit, but never mind, all is well. All the forms are filled in correctly even if patients are starving, lying in their own filth and infected by the many pathogens which abound in hospitals nowadays.

The increased number of hospital contracted infections is blamed on the misuse of antibiotics causing resistance, and there may be a little truth in that. But before there were antibiotics infections were not so prevelant. There were no antibiotics for the bacteria to be resistant to.

But there was cleaning. There were dedicated nurses. There were ward sisters and matrons of whom all working on the wards were in fear.
Harridans they may have seemed to the junior staff, but the buck did stop with them and thus they ruled with a rod of iron, to the benefit of all, not least and most importantly the patients.

This new idea of encouraging relatives (if patients had them) to visit more regularly shows the contempt for the profession of nursing by those in charge.
They show a lack of knowledge of infection control by encouraging even more visiting as visitors often introduce infection into an environment where sick people have enough on their plate (not food it seems)recovering from their various illnesses.

Visitors are a great comfort to patients but I believe visiting should be restricted in any case in order to lessen the chance of infection on the wards.

It seems nursing has gone the way of the bin men I spoke about a couple of days ago.
The bosses talk about it and fill all the forms in and are judged to have done a good job.

BUT the actual work (in nursing and TLC) comes a very distant second.

And that is what is wrong with our country.

Too much talk and not enough action.

P.S I do not include the reception and out patient staff at Wigan Infirmary in this little rant. They could not be more helpful, but then they are all native Wiganers to whom civility and courtesy comes naturally.

PANORAMA, A SHAMBOLIC INTERVIEW.

Has the BNP completely lost its marbles?

In a trailer for a film to expose the BBC to be played tonight the Party it seems made a complete fool of itself.
I accept that the BBC is infested by trendy PC Lefties and is no friend of ours but having admitted the reporters to the venue it was pure stupidity to make such a fool of themselves in front of not only their cameras but THOSE OF THE BBC who were also filming.
I agree filming any interview is good practice to enable rebuttal of sneaky editorial tactics and blatant lying which that organisation is often guilty of.
But do they not realise that their aggressive tactics will only portray the party in an even worse light and was recorded BY THE BBC?

The job of reporters in any case is to create interest in their programme by getting up the noses of the interviewees and is used against all parties.
If a party consents to be interviewed, surely the best course is to answer in a civilised manner in the hope of a positive portrayal. Civility can not be portrayed as bad manners even in a biased programme.

Why does our party have to be so defensive? Other parties are pleased to have their point of view aired even at the risk of bias.
Are our leaders and spokesmen not able to hold their own with reporters? Have they so little faith in their principles and facts?
To question reporters on the many perverts paedophiles and cheats in the BBC (which there are) is irrelevant.
A reporter's job is to ask, not answer questions and is not responsible for the conduct of others in his organisation, nor does he necessarily agree with that organisation's stance.

Nick Griffin complains that he has not been asked again on to "Question Time" where he knows they would try to ambush him as they did last time (next time I hope he is better prepared).
"Question Time" can be and is edited before it is broadcast whereas an interview on our premises can be videoed.
If he wants to be on that programme when he knows they will try to fit him up, why can he not answer in an interview controlled by the Party.
It looks as if he has something to hide. Has he?

We make fools of ourselves by behaving as Simon Darby does on this film and come over as wanting to deflect questions by asking irrelevent questions of the interviewer. We seem on the run as do those exposed on "Watchdog" and thus make a poor impression.

Yes the BBC are against us, but I believe by acting in such an aggressive way we will be portrayed in an even worse light than we would have been.
We are the ambassadors for Nationalism and if the behaviour on this "taster"is typical I shudder to think what the BBC have and what is on the rest of the film.

If that's the best we can do GOD HELP US!

NO WONDER WE ARE GOING DOWN!

A TALE OF FOUR BINS

A few days ago I wrote about waste by local and national government and the need to axe useless, nonproductive jobs which the general public would not miss.
This would help mitigate the disasterous national financial situation, I argued while those displaced from their unproductive positions could be redeployed in work which provided a return.

A day later I had an instance of such inefficiency.

My wife had asked for a "green bin" for garden rubbish, (why I do not know as we live on a farm, but that's not the point), and efficiently the next day one was delivered.
That was in April this year but the trouble is that it has never been emptied.

My wife rang the council and an official said he would get "The Green Bin Officer" to ring back.
We had a phone call the next day, not from the officer who was on holiday (it makes a change from being at a meeting or off sick) who said that they had no record of the green bin.
Not only that but that the computer did not indicate that the council had ever emptied our bin as the farm road was too narrow for the vehicle to access.

Now this is strange because a full sized bin wagon has emptied my bins since 1967 so it was strange to learn that the officer had no record of the bin wagon having visited my premises, in spite of their computer technology (no doubt requiring a "computer officer")
I believe he is to visit us to check whether the vehicle which has come down the drive for 40 years can actually do so. A nice hour out of the office for him.

Also for the last 10 months we have had a blue paper bin and a brown bottle bin provided by the council and which are emptied regularly as is the usual black wheely bin for general rubbish. Presumably these bins have their own controllers,(a blue, brown and black bin officer)but they don't know that we exist, in spite of emptying them.

I am a strong believer in recycling and I have no complaints at all with the service I get from the bin men, the people who actually do the work.
But times are hard and finances tight and cuts could have to be made.
I would expect these to fall on those at the bin face with fewer collections made.

Meanwhile I am sure all will be in order in the office and the various "officers" and "controllers" will continue to tap their keyboards and tick the requisite boxes at pay rates no doubt greater than those who actually do the donkey work.

All's well then

NO IT ISN'T!
This unimportant little episode indicates what is wrong with local and national government.
Many involved in controlling, discussing and record keeping --BUT FEW DOING THE WORK.

It can be put right, but will it?

I doubt it as those box tickers are the ones allocating the jobs and redundancies and you can be sure it will not be their jobs which will be lost.
IT WILL BE THE JOBS AT THE WORK FACE and the services which we want and pay for will deteriorate still further.

A TOFF TALKS TOUGH

Is David Cameron completely round the twist.

Fresh from his not yet achieved victory against Gadaffi he is spouting about tackling other regimes he does not like.

Who does he think he is?
Does he not realise that we are broke with the FTSE dropping 5% just today and the world predicted to be close to economic catastrophe?
Has he forgotten that he has downsized our forces and left us without aircraft carriers and planes to fly from them?
Does he not even yet see the costs of his and Blair's interference in other countries business has cost us not only the lives of many soldiers and the maiming of many more?
Does he not see the costs of combatting the terrorism which these escapades have encouraged?

Does he not realise that the British electorate wish him to extricate us from the costly mistake which is the EU, and that we do not want war which does not concern us.

He talks about sanctions, military and economic against dictatorships in the interests of democratic rights.
He even mentions Syria, China and Russia. Jesus wept!
He must be out of his mind but while he is mad and elated at his victory over a thinly populated Libya and the wind in his sails, what about North Korea, Pakistan and Israel?
Will he tacke them? I doubt it.

The UN is a toothless tiger and would never unite in common cause in any conflict or measures against any of the above countries, so it would just be the USA and its poodle Britain.
We had difficulty in getting the go ahead even in little Libya and even the other countries of the EU were not persuaded.

He is basically a soft public schoolboy (tennis player says it all) trying to look tough. Unfortunately this attempt is at the expense of the lives and livelyhoods of other people.

So Mr Cameron, its time you realised that our country, thanks to you and your predecessor is as weak as the average toff and in no position to talk tough.

You should mind your own business and look after our country.

Let's have some justice and democracy here!

That is supposed to be your job.

IS IT BECAUSE I IS BLACK?

Two men were executed yesterday for murder in the USA.
One case well known and publicised in the media was Troy Davis was executed in Georgia.
There was a vociferous campaign against this execution but in spite of many appeals he was still found guilty.

Another man, not so well publicised was also executed on the same day.
No media tears for him.
His name Lawrence Brewer a white man and alleged member of the KKK who had killed a black man.

Now I, unlike many in the BNP am against the death penalty and thus oppose both of thease judicial killings, BUT why the difference in the publicity.
Many of those vociferously opposing Davis's execution do it on the grounds that they are against the death penalty and I can as I said sympathise with that.

But what about Lawrence Brewer?. Is his death less of a "crime" just because he is white and an alleged member of the KKK? Is the life of a black murderer of more import than that of a white murderer?

Was the campaign to save Davis "because he was black"?

Was the silence over Brewer because he was white?

It seems so.

DISGUSTED OF WIGAN

Three months too late and thanks to John Walker I heard the recording of the EGM held in St Helens (not Wigan) and I am indeed shocked at the antics of the Chairman and his sycophantic acolytes.
I was unfortunately on holiday at the time and thus unable to attend, although I was kept in touch by local activists.

Although I had heard some details I had not realised the depths to which the chairman had sunk to get his way and protect his job and the finances of his family.
The meeting was a travesty of the democratic process with the chairman exerting his absolute power and bringing his proxy votes in on a vote on a resolution which had been formulated the night before, which overrode the will of the attendees at the meeting.

The people giving those proxy votes did not know on what they were voting, having given those votes before the resolution was formulated.
Sensible points from the floor from Arthur Kemp, Andrew Brons and Richard Edmonds were swept aside by this undemocratic and unfair system of voting, and from the tape it seems that even those present were only given the options of voting for the least bad motion rather than the one they wanted.

The motions carried (with the aid of proxy votes) contradicted the will of the party as expressed by previous conferences and meetings. The will of the Party activists was cast aside by those who had no idea of the issues, but were voting members who foolishly gave their mandate to the chairman, having no knowledge of Party matters apart from the untrue and biased propaganda fed to them by the party machine.

The whole meeting was a charade, a pretence of democracy worthy only of a Stalinist state.
Our party is supposed to stand for democracy in Britain, but it seems that principle is not allowed in the running of the party itself.

The way the motions were manipulated was a disgrace and a banana republic would have been more honest.

No wonder membership and donations are haemorrhaging (in spite of what they would have us believe).
Formerly I believed Nick Griffin was God but now I see him as a cheat who has abused my faith in him and the faith of his followers.
He has also done the cause of Nationalism great harm and thus harmed our country and people.
For what?

I can only assume it is for his own financial gain, that is the least damaging interpretation I can put on it. One could imagine other motives of which I will not speak(yet).
The Party owes me £5000 which I loaned them before the Euro elections and which I have requested is returned without receiving a reply.

Will I continue to support nationalism? YES all the time.

Will I continue to support a party ( the BNP)run by a liar and a cheat who has used every devious method in the book to consolidate his position at the cost of bringing the party down?

YOU MUST BE JOKING!

But all is not lost, as with the demise of the present set up moves are afoot to resurrect a clean honest and ELECTABLE Nationalist party which with common sense will gain strength, following and influence and work to save our country, freed from the self aggrandisement and avarice which now invests what I once was proud to call my party.

Have no fear NATIONALISM WILL PREVAIL.