I am sure that all normal human beings in the world will delight at the killing of Osama Bin Laden a man who has been responsible for thousands of deaths.
Of course he has many followers who will be bent on revenge but they were attempting to kill us before and hence the need to cut the head off this snake.
I wonder if our government will make contact wwith "communities" of muslims in Britain to reassure them. I expect they will.
The burial at sea was in my opinion an opportunity thrown away to show our contempt for this animal and his faith just as he has shown his contempt for our civilised values by beheading captives and putting the films on line.
He should have been fed to pigs or at least smeared with pig fat before disposal and the process videoed.
Would there be reprisals? Yes probably but these could be dealt with sternly and with the maximum use of pigs
That they wouldn't like it is the point and it is time our leaders realised that WE ARE AT WAR WITH THIS EVIL CULT AND WE MUST FIGHT TO WIN,as any sign of compromise on our part will be taken as a sign of weakness by them.
Bin Laden bragged that he loved death as we love life although his actions at the end contradict this. In other words he was a hypocrite as well.
GOOD RIDDANCE
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
Saturday, 30 April 2011
COMPARE...
...to the British press non-treatment of the same question/issue:
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110429/local/eu-absent.362821
Morg
.
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110429/local/eu-absent.362821
Morg
.
Friday, 29 April 2011
FRED, AGAIN
Ive already introduced you all to Fred Reed, (some months back ' Monkey can't let go'). Here he is again. You all know he's also talking about this country.
You can see the video here, at the site of the American Renaissance. AmRen is regarded as racist, and is, but consists mostly of articles from legitimate newspapers. It doesn’t make up its facts. The comments at the bottom are interesting in that they represent the response to the beating by a large part of the American population. Most don’t post such thoughts where the thought police can find them. They think them, and express them to friends.
Things are bad out in the world, with blacks openly furious at whites and a whole lot of whites quietly so in return. It isn’t a recipe for domestic tranquility. A price will be paid.
Two things stand out about the video. First, cell phones with video cameras built into them are changing the landscape of journalism. All teenagers and most adults now carry video cameras, the difference being that the teenagers know how to use them.
This is not unimportant. Note that such siege howitzers of the media as the BBC frequently run shaky, wobbly, low-res footage of such things as Syrian police beating people, or of citizens dying of bloody head wounds. These can be embarrassing enough to affect policy, and make it harder for repressive governments to control the press. It is now a crime in parts of the US to photograph a policeman; here, as in Syria, governments move to hide the behavior of their “security forces.” This is why China censors the internet, and Washington very much wants to. When the Egyptian public erupted, the government immediately shut down the net. It is interesting that Obama wants an “internet kill switch.”
The other salient point of the beating in Baltimore is that the Drudge Report, a huge, huge, huge site, posted the video under a banner headline almost as huge. I don’t know Matt Drudge, and so can’t speak to his motives, but he had to know that posting video of godawful beating of a white girl by blacks is Something One Doesn’t Do.
Various voices ask, Was it racial? Of course it was. You don’t beat someone into convulsing brain-damaged semi-consciousness over precedence in a line for the bathroom. Ravening homicidal hatred is needed. Welcome to the ghetto.
This sort of thing is not uncommon. In a previous life as a police reporter I encountered or knew of many instances, always of a gang of blacks beating hell out of a white, and in a manner to do serious damage. The maidens in the video wanted to hurt the girl, wanted to hur her badly, and continued kicking her dangerously when they had her helpless. It is one thing to punch someone’s lights out, another to kick him repeatedly in the head.
Always the media respond by describing the attackers as “teenagers” and “youths,” and by burying the story as quickly as possible. When I was writing my Police Beat column for the Washington Times, any mention of racial hatred disappeared during editing.
Ignoring the hatred is not going to serve anyone well, black or white. In the Cook County Jail in Chicago, I once interviewed a Three Star Perfect Elite, if my memory of the title serves, a high-ranking man in the BGD, Black Gangster Disciples. These were and probably are a serious gang. Why, I asked him, do black gang-bangers spend so much time killing other blacks?
“we’d rather kill whites, but we know we’d lose,” he said, stone cold. This disappeared in editing.
This is not remotely the sentiment of blacks in general, but of the decaying, jobless, culturally isolated slums. If if it boils over, which is entirely possible, nobody is going to like it. More accurately perhaps, a few blacks and whites would very much like it, but it would be hideous to decent people. You don’t solve a problem by hiding its existence.
Why do the media hide the attacks? I suspect that underlying the circumspection is a half-aware realization that if whites really knew what was happening, some might respond in kind, in which case God help the nation. Having no better idea what to do—I don’t either—journalists figure to keep the lid on and hope the problem goes away, which it won’t. The whole business smells of trouble.
Further, journalism is a rigorously conformist profession. You know what you have to say you believe. You say it. Joe Sobran once defined public opinion as “what everybody thinks everybody else thinks.” Exactly.
And the press corps in Washington lives in a hothouse, insulated from the rest of the country, for most of which they have contempt. They pride themselves on racial correctness yet, in a city the majority of which is black, they have only a few black friends unresembling those of the urban badlands of Northeast, and you never see them in restaurants and clubs where most patrons are black. Many seem to want to protect blacks from criticism. They don’t report reality because they don’t see it. What does this accomplish?
Thus if you point out that black schools in the cities are terrible, an assertion with which every black columnist in the US would agree, many journalists will furiously argue that it isn’t true—not quite calling you a racist, but very nearly. And so nothing changes.
Stray thought: What would you think of an oncologist who insisted that your tumor didn’t exist?
I wonder how wise this wanton inattention probably isn’t. The United States has a grave racial problem that isn’t getting better. The problem is not the black middle class, which is about like any other, but the dangerously angry underclass of the graveyard cities—Newark, Detroit, DC, Chicago, Trenton, Dade, Richmond, Atlanta, on and on. I’ve spent many nights in such places. It’s ugly. And it’s explosive. Depending on your politics, you can blame blacks, whites, God, terrorists, or sunspots, none of which changes anything.
Psychology trumps politics. We can do the liberals-vs-conservatives dance, call each other racists, howl and yowl and pose and prance. What fun. But a spring is being wound. The economy declines, auguring cuts in social subsidies and perilous unrest. Los Angeles burned. It can burn again. The hatred is still there. If there is a solution to the racial disaster, we had better find it.
Go and read some of the other Fred on Everything columns; he's always worth reading, even when he says stuff you don't like... and he will do so for sure.
http://www.fredoneverything.net/Baltimore.shtml
Morg
.
Bad Time in Baltimore
A Time for Attention
Date
.I found on the Drudge Report yesterday a cell-phone video of yet another attack against whites by feral blacks in the cities, in this case Baltimore, where in a McDonald’s two black females kicked a white girl into convulsions, presumably due to brain damage. It seems there was a dispute over precedence for the rest room.You can see the video here, at the site of the American Renaissance. AmRen is regarded as racist, and is, but consists mostly of articles from legitimate newspapers. It doesn’t make up its facts. The comments at the bottom are interesting in that they represent the response to the beating by a large part of the American population. Most don’t post such thoughts where the thought police can find them. They think them, and express them to friends.
Things are bad out in the world, with blacks openly furious at whites and a whole lot of whites quietly so in return. It isn’t a recipe for domestic tranquility. A price will be paid.
Two things stand out about the video. First, cell phones with video cameras built into them are changing the landscape of journalism. All teenagers and most adults now carry video cameras, the difference being that the teenagers know how to use them.
This is not unimportant. Note that such siege howitzers of the media as the BBC frequently run shaky, wobbly, low-res footage of such things as Syrian police beating people, or of citizens dying of bloody head wounds. These can be embarrassing enough to affect policy, and make it harder for repressive governments to control the press. It is now a crime in parts of the US to photograph a policeman; here, as in Syria, governments move to hide the behavior of their “security forces.” This is why China censors the internet, and Washington very much wants to. When the Egyptian public erupted, the government immediately shut down the net. It is interesting that Obama wants an “internet kill switch.”
The other salient point of the beating in Baltimore is that the Drudge Report, a huge, huge, huge site, posted the video under a banner headline almost as huge. I don’t know Matt Drudge, and so can’t speak to his motives, but he had to know that posting video of godawful beating of a white girl by blacks is Something One Doesn’t Do.
Various voices ask, Was it racial? Of course it was. You don’t beat someone into convulsing brain-damaged semi-consciousness over precedence in a line for the bathroom. Ravening homicidal hatred is needed. Welcome to the ghetto.
This sort of thing is not uncommon. In a previous life as a police reporter I encountered or knew of many instances, always of a gang of blacks beating hell out of a white, and in a manner to do serious damage. The maidens in the video wanted to hurt the girl, wanted to hur her badly, and continued kicking her dangerously when they had her helpless. It is one thing to punch someone’s lights out, another to kick him repeatedly in the head.
Always the media respond by describing the attackers as “teenagers” and “youths,” and by burying the story as quickly as possible. When I was writing my Police Beat column for the Washington Times, any mention of racial hatred disappeared during editing.
Ignoring the hatred is not going to serve anyone well, black or white. In the Cook County Jail in Chicago, I once interviewed a Three Star Perfect Elite, if my memory of the title serves, a high-ranking man in the BGD, Black Gangster Disciples. These were and probably are a serious gang. Why, I asked him, do black gang-bangers spend so much time killing other blacks?
“we’d rather kill whites, but we know we’d lose,” he said, stone cold. This disappeared in editing.
This is not remotely the sentiment of blacks in general, but of the decaying, jobless, culturally isolated slums. If if it boils over, which is entirely possible, nobody is going to like it. More accurately perhaps, a few blacks and whites would very much like it, but it would be hideous to decent people. You don’t solve a problem by hiding its existence.
Why do the media hide the attacks? I suspect that underlying the circumspection is a half-aware realization that if whites really knew what was happening, some might respond in kind, in which case God help the nation. Having no better idea what to do—I don’t either—journalists figure to keep the lid on and hope the problem goes away, which it won’t. The whole business smells of trouble.
Further, journalism is a rigorously conformist profession. You know what you have to say you believe. You say it. Joe Sobran once defined public opinion as “what everybody thinks everybody else thinks.” Exactly.
And the press corps in Washington lives in a hothouse, insulated from the rest of the country, for most of which they have contempt. They pride themselves on racial correctness yet, in a city the majority of which is black, they have only a few black friends unresembling those of the urban badlands of Northeast, and you never see them in restaurants and clubs where most patrons are black. Many seem to want to protect blacks from criticism. They don’t report reality because they don’t see it. What does this accomplish?
Thus if you point out that black schools in the cities are terrible, an assertion with which every black columnist in the US would agree, many journalists will furiously argue that it isn’t true—not quite calling you a racist, but very nearly. And so nothing changes.
Stray thought: What would you think of an oncologist who insisted that your tumor didn’t exist?
I wonder how wise this wanton inattention probably isn’t. The United States has a grave racial problem that isn’t getting better. The problem is not the black middle class, which is about like any other, but the dangerously angry underclass of the graveyard cities—Newark, Detroit, DC, Chicago, Trenton, Dade, Richmond, Atlanta, on and on. I’ve spent many nights in such places. It’s ugly. And it’s explosive. Depending on your politics, you can blame blacks, whites, God, terrorists, or sunspots, none of which changes anything.
Psychology trumps politics. We can do the liberals-vs-conservatives dance, call each other racists, howl and yowl and pose and prance. What fun. But a spring is being wound. The economy declines, auguring cuts in social subsidies and perilous unrest. Los Angeles burned. It can burn again. The hatred is still there. If there is a solution to the racial disaster, we had better find it.
Go and read some of the other Fred on Everything columns; he's always worth reading, even when he says stuff you don't like... and he will do so for sure.
http://www.fredoneverything.net/Baltimore.shtml
Morg
.
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
BADLUCK FOR GOODLUCK
Elections were held in Nigeria last week which were judged by international observers as fair which is unusual in an African state.
This however did not stop rioting and bloodshed.
Why?
Because the North of the country is muslim and the South is Christian and the winner the strangely named Goodluck Jonathan was named the president.
In spite of his name he has the badluck of having a muslim population in the North of his country which does not believe in democracy and when they lose an election resort to violence.
It is Goodluck's badluck that although fairly elected his country has a large minority of muslims who do not believe in the rule of law or democracy.
What has this got to do with us? you may ask.
Well it illustrates the danger when muslims meet with non muslims in one country and the former's violence in the promotion of their aims.
Yes well that is Africa you may well say, and so it is but muslims are the same the world over, always aggressive and not amenable to the non muslim rule of law.
This is a scenario we will face before long if we allow this alien medieval cult to expand in our country.
We must halt ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION into our country now and curtail the activities of those already here.
The trouble in the Ivory Coast has a similar cause, muslim violence against non muslims.
Wherever in the world from Asia to Africa the devotees of this evil cult impinge on the other moderate and more civilised people there is trouble.
We must avoid the badluck that Goodluck has to put up with in his own country.
So I wish you luck Goodluck in your fight against barbarism and hope you can snuff this evil cancer from your land, and I hope our government can see the dangers of the same happening here.
This however did not stop rioting and bloodshed.
Why?
Because the North of the country is muslim and the South is Christian and the winner the strangely named Goodluck Jonathan was named the president.
In spite of his name he has the badluck of having a muslim population in the North of his country which does not believe in democracy and when they lose an election resort to violence.
It is Goodluck's badluck that although fairly elected his country has a large minority of muslims who do not believe in the rule of law or democracy.
What has this got to do with us? you may ask.
Well it illustrates the danger when muslims meet with non muslims in one country and the former's violence in the promotion of their aims.
Yes well that is Africa you may well say, and so it is but muslims are the same the world over, always aggressive and not amenable to the non muslim rule of law.
This is a scenario we will face before long if we allow this alien medieval cult to expand in our country.
We must halt ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION into our country now and curtail the activities of those already here.
The trouble in the Ivory Coast has a similar cause, muslim violence against non muslims.
Wherever in the world from Asia to Africa the devotees of this evil cult impinge on the other moderate and more civilised people there is trouble.
We must avoid the badluck that Goodluck has to put up with in his own country.
So I wish you luck Goodluck in your fight against barbarism and hope you can snuff this evil cancer from your land, and I hope our government can see the dangers of the same happening here.
Monday, 18 April 2011
WHY IS NATIONALISM NOT PROGRESSING IN BRITAIN?
The news last week that the nationalist True Finns party gained 29% of the vote in their country gives the nationalists of Europe cause for hope.
The Finns, a brave country who have suffered and repelled invaders, notably the Soviet Union have once again shown their independence and their wish for freedom and the good nationalist vote in that country is putting strains on the European superstate.
One can understand these brave people who have so bravely protected their country over the years and built up great shipbuilding and electronics industries without the "benefits" of diversity in a harsh climate.
They have fought and suffered for their freedom and built their industries and asked for nothing but the right to run their country as they wish.
This people is composed of patriots, and having fought for freedom will not give it up lightly.
Other European countries such as Denmark and Holland are also embracing the nationalist cause, seeing that the EU is Communism or Naziism lite as yet.
Our leaders still occasionally talk the talk but will not walk the walk and continue to appease the EU and allow hordes of aliens into our country against the wishes of the people.
Even the supposedly "patriotic" UKIP has newly arrived Sri Lankan to leaflet for them, a sure demonstration that they are just a safety valve for disaffected Tories.
What is wrong with our people?
Perhaps we haqve not suffered enough to value our nation and its culture as the Finns and Danes have.
BUT ask people in the street whether they agree with the policies of the BNP and over 50% say they do BUT THEY DON'T VOTE FOR US.
WHY?
One reason of course is apathy. I'm alright Jack, for now and they can not see the impending economic and demographic catastrophe.
Another reason is the continuous vilification of our party by the capitalist controlled media who see us as a threat to their globalist agenda which would see the people as units of production or consumption in "the post democratic society", not my words but those of Peter Mandelson.
However possibly an even bigger reason is us, our party which has not capitalised on the growing discontent of the people.
The British National Party has been run inefficiently both financially and structurally. It's no good having good policies if they are not put in a way that resonates with the public.
It's no good having a party with a structure so shambolic that no one knows who is doing what and good and senior members are sacked for asking questions and those financial questions are not answered.
In effect the party is inefficient in finance and structure.
HOWEVER the main fault with the Party is that it is not democratic and the leader has so much power that no one dare question it.
Nick Griffin has done a lot for the BNP and worked but no one is perfect and he has made some howling mistakes which have set back our cause.
He has become a liability and many people, although they agree with our policies will not support us while he is leader.
He has too much baggage and although many on the Left have similar and worse baggage in the political climate we must have a leader who is squeaky clean. That is the nature of politics in Britain now, and we and he has to accept that, unjust though it is.
If he really believes in Nationalism he should step down and we would thank him for that.
If he decides to remain as leader and contests the next challenge he will show he cares more about himself than the cause.
There are many good people who could take his place or could develop into leaders but such is the dictatorship of the present setup they dare not put their heads above the parapet or they risk expulsion.
WE need a new leader and one will emerge.
Even more we need unity, to put past differences behind us and work together for the sake of our country and future.
We need to keep our membership in the Party or we will not have the chance to elect a new and even better leader, untainted by past indiscretions. Small splinter parties will achieve nothing.
ABOVE ALL we need honesty. Nationalism is on the rise all over Europe and we need to ask "why is it not rising here"?
If we can not be honest with ourselves and realise our own weaknesses and shortcomings we will fail to progress as patriots in other countries have.
AND WE WILL NOT DESERVE TO for if we can not run a party efficiently when the people are crying out for a voice-- how will we ever be fit to run a country?
The Finns, a brave country who have suffered and repelled invaders, notably the Soviet Union have once again shown their independence and their wish for freedom and the good nationalist vote in that country is putting strains on the European superstate.
One can understand these brave people who have so bravely protected their country over the years and built up great shipbuilding and electronics industries without the "benefits" of diversity in a harsh climate.
They have fought and suffered for their freedom and built their industries and asked for nothing but the right to run their country as they wish.
This people is composed of patriots, and having fought for freedom will not give it up lightly.
Other European countries such as Denmark and Holland are also embracing the nationalist cause, seeing that the EU is Communism or Naziism lite as yet.
Our leaders still occasionally talk the talk but will not walk the walk and continue to appease the EU and allow hordes of aliens into our country against the wishes of the people.
Even the supposedly "patriotic" UKIP has newly arrived Sri Lankan to leaflet for them, a sure demonstration that they are just a safety valve for disaffected Tories.
What is wrong with our people?
Perhaps we haqve not suffered enough to value our nation and its culture as the Finns and Danes have.
BUT ask people in the street whether they agree with the policies of the BNP and over 50% say they do BUT THEY DON'T VOTE FOR US.
WHY?
One reason of course is apathy. I'm alright Jack, for now and they can not see the impending economic and demographic catastrophe.
Another reason is the continuous vilification of our party by the capitalist controlled media who see us as a threat to their globalist agenda which would see the people as units of production or consumption in "the post democratic society", not my words but those of Peter Mandelson.
However possibly an even bigger reason is us, our party which has not capitalised on the growing discontent of the people.
The British National Party has been run inefficiently both financially and structurally. It's no good having good policies if they are not put in a way that resonates with the public.
It's no good having a party with a structure so shambolic that no one knows who is doing what and good and senior members are sacked for asking questions and those financial questions are not answered.
In effect the party is inefficient in finance and structure.
HOWEVER the main fault with the Party is that it is not democratic and the leader has so much power that no one dare question it.
Nick Griffin has done a lot for the BNP and worked but no one is perfect and he has made some howling mistakes which have set back our cause.
He has become a liability and many people, although they agree with our policies will not support us while he is leader.
He has too much baggage and although many on the Left have similar and worse baggage in the political climate we must have a leader who is squeaky clean. That is the nature of politics in Britain now, and we and he has to accept that, unjust though it is.
If he really believes in Nationalism he should step down and we would thank him for that.
If he decides to remain as leader and contests the next challenge he will show he cares more about himself than the cause.
There are many good people who could take his place or could develop into leaders but such is the dictatorship of the present setup they dare not put their heads above the parapet or they risk expulsion.
WE need a new leader and one will emerge.
Even more we need unity, to put past differences behind us and work together for the sake of our country and future.
We need to keep our membership in the Party or we will not have the chance to elect a new and even better leader, untainted by past indiscretions. Small splinter parties will achieve nothing.
ABOVE ALL we need honesty. Nationalism is on the rise all over Europe and we need to ask "why is it not rising here"?
If we can not be honest with ourselves and realise our own weaknesses and shortcomings we will fail to progress as patriots in other countries have.
AND WE WILL NOT DESERVE TO for if we can not run a party efficiently when the people are crying out for a voice-- how will we ever be fit to run a country?
ONE LAW FOR SOME ...
The moron who burned the poppies at the Remembrance Day service gets a £50 fine and outraged a nation.
London Evening Standard
Cumberland News.
The word disproportionate seems to apply here. After all if some idiot artist can put on display a bible to be defaced and has nothing done to them. this guy should surely have expected the same, save I suppose that he didn't call it art.
I suspect Andrew Ryan will end up a hero in some quarters, despite the theft, I have to admit I don't like the idea of burning books, but I have never felt so close to burning a Koran as I've done this afternoon, sadly though I now know the cost of freedom of expression and that's 70 days in jail.
 |
| Emdadur Choudhury Islamic scumbag |
Now a guy who burns a Koran in protest gets a 70 day prison sentence.The Prime Minister told the Commons that a "stronger statement" should have been made to show public disgust at the man's action."I think to many of us, you look at something like that and feel that we should be making a stronger statement that the sort of behaviour is out of order and has no place in a tolerant country," he said.
Cumberland News.
Ok it wasn't his Koran, he stole it from the library, however that normally involves just a fine not a custodial sentence, but 70 days for outraging Muslims whilst the moron who burned a poppy and outraged the nation gets only a £50 fine?A man who burned a copy of the Koran in Carlisle city centre was today jailed for 70 days.Andrew Ryan, 32, of Summerhill, off London Road, was accompanied to Carlisle Magistrates' Court by supporters carrying a St George's Cross flag who were chanting "We love you England".
Ryan had pleaded guilty to racially aggravated harrassment and theft of the Koran holy book from Carlisle Library at an earlier hearing.
The word disproportionate seems to apply here. After all if some idiot artist can put on display a bible to be defaced and has nothing done to them. this guy should surely have expected the same, save I suppose that he didn't call it art.
I suspect Andrew Ryan will end up a hero in some quarters, despite the theft, I have to admit I don't like the idea of burning books, but I have never felt so close to burning a Koran as I've done this afternoon, sadly though I now know the cost of freedom of expression and that's 70 days in jail.
ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL
BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
George Orwell, Animal Farm Chapter 10.
Read the rest - comments are good.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)