I read muslim brides to be are having their hymens repaired before marriage on the NHS to "restore" their virginity so that they will bleed on their "first night"
Muslims are obsessed with sex. That is why their women must wear the veil (some may be just ugly of course). In many countries women are not allowed out without a male relative, presumably because they fear that men will be overcome with lust and unable to control themselves.
Women who succumb to sexual temptation are liable to be stoned to death. How civilised, a true indication of a modern educated society.
It seems that if a bride is not considered to be a virgin it brings disgrace on her family and she could possibly be killed to preserve the family honour. Some honour!
So because of this the NHS is paying for this restoration of virginity, or at least the semblance of purity enough to satisfy the parents of the groom who inspect the bed sheets the morning after.
If these people want to go through this charade I have no objections but I DO OBJECT TO PAYING FOR IT. They should have it done privately but not at our expense.
Nowadays the NHS is considering delaying "non essential" operations such as varicose vein surgery when delay can result in ulcers and a lifetime's disability. Cancer drugs are being denied,nursing numbers cut while these non medical proceedures still carried out.
The trouble is this religion and the threat to women unfortunate enough to be born into it.
But the answer is to clamp down on the cause, islam and not deprive our people of necessary tratment because of it.
The benefits of diversity!
Friday, 30 July 2010
Thursday, 29 July 2010
ALLAHU AKBAR
DO NOT WATCH THIS IF YOU ARE UNDER 16 OR OF A NERVOUS DISPOSITION
Click on image for larger picture
(Quran: Sura Al-Muhammad 47:4)
“So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh's Cause), those who disbelieve, smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm or at least come under your protection.”
Or maybe:
(Quran: Sura 47, Verse 4)
“As for the captives, the amir [ruler] has the choice of taking the most beneficial action of four possibilities: the first to put them to death by cutting their necks; the second, to enslave them and apply the laws of slavery regarding their sale and manumission; the third, to ransom them in exchange for goods or prisoners; and fourth, to show favor to them and pardon them. Allah, may he be exalted, says, 'When you encounter those [infidels] who deny [the Truth=Islam] then strike [their] necks'”.
ALL IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, THE RELIGION OF PEACE.
Click on image for larger picture(Quran: Sura Al-Muhammad 47:4)
“So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh's Cause), those who disbelieve, smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm or at least come under your protection.”
Or maybe:
(Quran: Sura 47, Verse 4)
“As for the captives, the amir [ruler] has the choice of taking the most beneficial action of four possibilities: the first to put them to death by cutting their necks; the second, to enslave them and apply the laws of slavery regarding their sale and manumission; the third, to ransom them in exchange for goods or prisoners; and fourth, to show favor to them and pardon them. Allah, may he be exalted, says, 'When you encounter those [infidels] who deny [the Truth=Islam] then strike [their] necks'”.
ALL IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, THE RELIGION OF PEACE.
CAMERON "OFF SCRIPT" SAYS DAVID MILLIBAND
David Cameron is on a visit to India, partly to give unfettered Immigration to the Indians but also to drum up trade for the UK. What trade can we do with India ? Export some Indian Immigrants back ?
Not a chance on Dave's watch.
Cameron had the audacity, according to the Foreigner Milliband, to point the finger at Pakistan for it's role in supporting Islamic terrorists fighting our troops in Afghanistan.
"Mr Cameron caused anger in Islamabad when he warned that Pakistan should not be allowed ''to promote the export of terror'' in the world. "
But the strange thing about his visit is David Millibands comment that Cameron is "GOING OFF SCRIPT".
What script would this be ?
This revealing remark by the TRAITOR Milliband should have every Indigenous person worrying.
What I make of it is a HIDDEN AGENDA by ALL THE PARLIAMENTARY POLITICAL PARTIES.
Has "LOUDMOUTH" Cameron let the cat out of the bag ? I don't think so, as we all knew that Pakistan and the Pakistanis in Britain are aiding, fighting with and supplying the Taliban and the insurgents in Afghanistan against British troops.
What is Milliband upto, what is he referring to ? Why is Cameron "OFF SCRIPT" ?
What script, whose script ?
Is Milliband worrried that the we will realise that we are storing up years of Civil and Social unrest from the ISLAMISTS which New Labour have allowed to enter our country ?
This is all to do with selling us, the INDIGENOUS BRITISH, out.
We cannot trust the Lib/Lab/Con to secure the future safety of British soldiers in Afghanistan nor can they, nor will they secure the future for the INDIGENOUS BRITISH in OUR HOMELAND.
With the mass Immigration from Pakistan and ISLAMIST COUNTRIES comes the prospect of MASS TERRORISM from ISLAMISTS in our lands.
Who will secure OUR LANDS for OUR PEOPLE ?
Only WE, THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY can do that, and to do that we need to sweep away the whole rotten traitorous scum, mainly of FOREIGN extraction, which now infest the halls of power, be that in Westminister or local government.
Why else do you think they all unite against us ?
Because we CAN and WILL restore BRITAIN FOR THE BRITISH.
WE NEED TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK AND SOON.
If you think things are bad now what will they be like after another 5 years of Lib/Lab/Con Anti-British Traitorous misrule and open discrimination of the Indigenous British ?
I dread to think.
Not a chance on Dave's watch.
Cameron had the audacity, according to the Foreigner Milliband, to point the finger at Pakistan for it's role in supporting Islamic terrorists fighting our troops in Afghanistan.
"Mr Cameron caused anger in Islamabad when he warned that Pakistan should not be allowed ''to promote the export of terror'' in the world. "
But the strange thing about his visit is David Millibands comment that Cameron is "GOING OFF SCRIPT".
What script would this be ?
This revealing remark by the TRAITOR Milliband should have every Indigenous person worrying.
What I make of it is a HIDDEN AGENDA by ALL THE PARLIAMENTARY POLITICAL PARTIES.
Has "LOUDMOUTH" Cameron let the cat out of the bag ? I don't think so, as we all knew that Pakistan and the Pakistanis in Britain are aiding, fighting with and supplying the Taliban and the insurgents in Afghanistan against British troops.
What is Milliband upto, what is he referring to ? Why is Cameron "OFF SCRIPT" ?
What script, whose script ?
Is Milliband worrried that the we will realise that we are storing up years of Civil and Social unrest from the ISLAMISTS which New Labour have allowed to enter our country ?
This is all to do with selling us, the INDIGENOUS BRITISH, out.
We cannot trust the Lib/Lab/Con to secure the future safety of British soldiers in Afghanistan nor can they, nor will they secure the future for the INDIGENOUS BRITISH in OUR HOMELAND.
With the mass Immigration from Pakistan and ISLAMIST COUNTRIES comes the prospect of MASS TERRORISM from ISLAMISTS in our lands.
Who will secure OUR LANDS for OUR PEOPLE ?
Only WE, THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY can do that, and to do that we need to sweep away the whole rotten traitorous scum, mainly of FOREIGN extraction, which now infest the halls of power, be that in Westminister or local government.
Why else do you think they all unite against us ?
Because we CAN and WILL restore BRITAIN FOR THE BRITISH.
WE NEED TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK AND SOON.
If you think things are bad now what will they be like after another 5 years of Lib/Lab/Con Anti-British Traitorous misrule and open discrimination of the Indigenous British ?
I dread to think.
CULTURAL MARXISM IN EUROPE AND AMERICA.
Valdas Anelauskas lives now in the USA having been driven out of his home country (Lithuania), under political exile, and is doing his best to expose the Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism and how it is being implemented here in the USA.
He states in one of his writings:
"Today, reflecting on the time when we first arrived here, I realize how naive I was. Or perhaps ignorant. I really believed that the United States of America was a democratic and free country. Moreover, I imagined it to be a highly advanced and progressive nation, maybe even the most civilized country on earth in history. How foolish of me!"
He points out that many of the Marxist plans and ideology he saw in the USSR are actually happening here in the USA within popular social movements …. having different names but Marxist never the less. Most have no idea it is happening. Cultural Marxism is very much alive here and the plan is being carried out here and now. The location of the presentation had to be changed twice at the last minute because of disrupters.
This is not just about CULTURAL MARXISM in America. Substitute America for Britain or Europe and you get the same CULTURAL MARXISM.
He states in one of his writings:
"Today, reflecting on the time when we first arrived here, I realize how naive I was. Or perhaps ignorant. I really believed that the United States of America was a democratic and free country. Moreover, I imagined it to be a highly advanced and progressive nation, maybe even the most civilized country on earth in history. How foolish of me!"
He points out that many of the Marxist plans and ideology he saw in the USSR are actually happening here in the USA within popular social movements …. having different names but Marxist never the less. Most have no idea it is happening. Cultural Marxism is very much alive here and the plan is being carried out here and now. The location of the presentation had to be changed twice at the last minute because of disrupters.
This is not just about CULTURAL MARXISM in America. Substitute America for Britain or Europe and you get the same CULTURAL MARXISM.
JIHAD IN EUROPE
Geert Wilders Fitna made many aware of the Islamization of Europe. If Fitna was an eye-opener, then watch this video. Muslim immigration & multiculturalism is a threatening mix for the indigenous peoples of Europe. Political, social and militant Islam flourishes as political correctness runs rampant among European countries. The death of the West is certain unless this runaway train is derailed. Moderator: Janet Levy (The David Horowitz Freedom Center). Panelists: Robert Spencer (Jihad Watch), Melanie Philips (journalist and author) and Douglas Murray (author and writer).
MOVE OUT FOR IMMIGRANTS
The proposal to force people living in council houses to move into smaller accomodation when their family leaves home is an insidious attack on our way of life.
It is said that there are many people who have too much space and they should make way for people with larger families.
We know that British families have been becoming smaller so there should at first sight be no need for this proposal.
The only people to benefit are the large immigrant families which are already placing such a burden on our maternity units and schools. So to accomodate these large families British people will find themselves forced into smaller accomodation whether they like it or not.
It is said that these large families are poor. They should have thought about that before knocking out so many babies and expecting us to support them.
Many council estates will become ghettoes of immigrants eroding even further our sense of community.
I was always against the "right to buy" policy as it deprived hard working people on low wages somewhere to live. Social housing is important but it should be only provided for native Brits.
One aspect of the right to buy that was good however was that ownership brought with it pride and thus on many estates where houses have been bought they have become neater and better maintained.
Security of tenure in rented accomodation is another way of encouraging pride in one's house. If you feel that you are there for life you keep your garden neat and ensure the interior is well looked after.
Under the new proposals if people are threatened with forced moving they will see no point in maintaining the appearance of the house. Why keep a neat tidy garden when it will be taken away and given to a refugee family?
If enacted this proposal will cause deterioration of our council housing stock and communities and injustice for those who have worked to pay the taxes to build them. It is just another not so subtle way of further destroying our society and community.
These houses were built for British people and they should have priority.
There is no shortage of houses, just too many people taking the British people's birthright.
Get rid of the illegal immigrants, stop all these bogus asylum claims and job solved.
Sufficient housing for all.
YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE but it's not what this government wants.
It is said that there are many people who have too much space and they should make way for people with larger families.
We know that British families have been becoming smaller so there should at first sight be no need for this proposal.
The only people to benefit are the large immigrant families which are already placing such a burden on our maternity units and schools. So to accomodate these large families British people will find themselves forced into smaller accomodation whether they like it or not.
It is said that these large families are poor. They should have thought about that before knocking out so many babies and expecting us to support them.
Many council estates will become ghettoes of immigrants eroding even further our sense of community.
I was always against the "right to buy" policy as it deprived hard working people on low wages somewhere to live. Social housing is important but it should be only provided for native Brits.
One aspect of the right to buy that was good however was that ownership brought with it pride and thus on many estates where houses have been bought they have become neater and better maintained.
Security of tenure in rented accomodation is another way of encouraging pride in one's house. If you feel that you are there for life you keep your garden neat and ensure the interior is well looked after.
Under the new proposals if people are threatened with forced moving they will see no point in maintaining the appearance of the house. Why keep a neat tidy garden when it will be taken away and given to a refugee family?
If enacted this proposal will cause deterioration of our council housing stock and communities and injustice for those who have worked to pay the taxes to build them. It is just another not so subtle way of further destroying our society and community.
These houses were built for British people and they should have priority.
There is no shortage of houses, just too many people taking the British people's birthright.
Get rid of the illegal immigrants, stop all these bogus asylum claims and job solved.
Sufficient housing for all.
YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE but it's not what this government wants.
Wednesday, 28 July 2010
CAMERON'S WORLD TOUR
So our great Prime Minister continues his worldwide tour and is now in India.
A week ago he was in the USA reminding them that we were a junior partner to them in WW2 in 1940 before the Americans had joined the conflict.
His Eton history education must have been somewhat deficient as the USA only joined the war after Pearl Harbour on 7/12/41.
Admittedly they did give us some assistance in some obsolete cruisers before then in exchange for parts of the British Empire and money which we only finished paying off 4 years ago.
Germany and Japan of course were not landed with these debts and the cost of repaying them hindered critically our ability to rebuild after the war.
It was a good deal for America. We saved the world and they took the profits, so not much has changed. Their banking system in America has screwed us in recent years while we taxpayers pay the bill.
I suggest our Prime Minister demands the fees back his affluent parents paid for history lessons at that school.
He now is venturing East and has been making conciliatory speeches to Turkey stating his hope that they could soon be a member of the EU.
This is the man (liar?)who promised us a referendum on EU membership but has now renaged on that promise. I suppose it is par for the course for the present cabal of traitors to our country who at present rule us. His historical kinowledge seems also deficient in Turkey's past. Massacre of Armenians in the Thirties for example. To mention this in the "democratic" Turkey is a crime.
Recently I went to Cyprus and went to the Turkish North. My first impression was of it's Stalinist nature. Massive statues of Kemal Attaturk adorned the mountains and road islands, he always in a militarist pose. The Turkish government if granted membership of the EU which they could be in spite of their human rights violations would achieve what the Ottoman Turks tried but failed to do in the Middle Ages, domination of Europe.
The Greek Cypriots with whom I spoke were against Turkish accession to the EU as are I suppose the Greek people.
What do they matter? The powerful have spoken even if the majority of Europeans do not want them in. It's big business and Global Capitalism again. Business rules all and the people are just pawns to have their culture traditions and identity subverted in the rush to Globlised capitalism.
In a word we do not matter. "Its good for business" trumps all and if the people do not like it they must lump it.
It is no coincidence that Cameron's father was a stockbroker and Clegg's a banker so you know where they are coming from.
WE are told we live in a democracy. NO WE DON'T.
We live in what a Tory minister, I think Ken Clarke called an "elective dictatorship". A party is elected in a large part by people voting against the previous government and its leader then puts his often ( and usually ) mad pet theories into practice and has up to five years to exercise his dictatorship. Nobody can stop him unless disaster strikes or he resigns.
So continuing his progress our Prime Minister changes the policies on which he was elected.
He promised to curtail immigration and now is consulting the Turkish government on OUR immigration policy to see if they like it.
In India today he arrived with humility. Why. If you do not agree with empire or not, its existance had nothing to do with us. (possibly his family made some of its wealth on the backs of Indian peasants so perhaps he should apologise but mine didn't so don't be humble on my part lad).
The Indians also did not like our immigration policies as it hindered their people from coming here.
Now I believe in friendship with all countries and non interference in their internal policies so I would be grateful if India would extend the same rights to us as they demand from us.
British people are not allowed to emigrate to India. They can go on a work permit (on sufference) but not gain nationality unless they are of Indian stock. But this is not what Cameron and his pushy poodle Cable he of Indian wife fame wishes.
I am not against Indians, indeed of all non Europeans I prefer them but we must have impartiality and we can not sustain ANY increased population.
They are wanting a one way traffic, Indians to Britain, not the reverse even though per square mile we are more densely populated than India.
So Mr Cameron, you are no democrat. You are a dictator with no mandate from the British people to persue these policies. If they were likely to be of advantage to the AVERAGE British citizen I could POSSIBLY accept them, but they evidently do not.
Your policies only benefit your wealthy paymasters in the City of London and the increasingly non British section of the electorate to which you pander.
Give our country away and the wrath of the British people will be upon you, and in the downturn in our economy which is surely coming will test our patience you will reap the whirlwind.
WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH.
A week ago he was in the USA reminding them that we were a junior partner to them in WW2 in 1940 before the Americans had joined the conflict.
His Eton history education must have been somewhat deficient as the USA only joined the war after Pearl Harbour on 7/12/41.
Admittedly they did give us some assistance in some obsolete cruisers before then in exchange for parts of the British Empire and money which we only finished paying off 4 years ago.
Germany and Japan of course were not landed with these debts and the cost of repaying them hindered critically our ability to rebuild after the war.
It was a good deal for America. We saved the world and they took the profits, so not much has changed. Their banking system in America has screwed us in recent years while we taxpayers pay the bill.
I suggest our Prime Minister demands the fees back his affluent parents paid for history lessons at that school.
He now is venturing East and has been making conciliatory speeches to Turkey stating his hope that they could soon be a member of the EU.
This is the man (liar?)who promised us a referendum on EU membership but has now renaged on that promise. I suppose it is par for the course for the present cabal of traitors to our country who at present rule us. His historical kinowledge seems also deficient in Turkey's past. Massacre of Armenians in the Thirties for example. To mention this in the "democratic" Turkey is a crime.
Recently I went to Cyprus and went to the Turkish North. My first impression was of it's Stalinist nature. Massive statues of Kemal Attaturk adorned the mountains and road islands, he always in a militarist pose. The Turkish government if granted membership of the EU which they could be in spite of their human rights violations would achieve what the Ottoman Turks tried but failed to do in the Middle Ages, domination of Europe.
The Greek Cypriots with whom I spoke were against Turkish accession to the EU as are I suppose the Greek people.
What do they matter? The powerful have spoken even if the majority of Europeans do not want them in. It's big business and Global Capitalism again. Business rules all and the people are just pawns to have their culture traditions and identity subverted in the rush to Globlised capitalism.
In a word we do not matter. "Its good for business" trumps all and if the people do not like it they must lump it.
It is no coincidence that Cameron's father was a stockbroker and Clegg's a banker so you know where they are coming from.
WE are told we live in a democracy. NO WE DON'T.
We live in what a Tory minister, I think Ken Clarke called an "elective dictatorship". A party is elected in a large part by people voting against the previous government and its leader then puts his often ( and usually ) mad pet theories into practice and has up to five years to exercise his dictatorship. Nobody can stop him unless disaster strikes or he resigns.
So continuing his progress our Prime Minister changes the policies on which he was elected.
He promised to curtail immigration and now is consulting the Turkish government on OUR immigration policy to see if they like it.
In India today he arrived with humility. Why. If you do not agree with empire or not, its existance had nothing to do with us. (possibly his family made some of its wealth on the backs of Indian peasants so perhaps he should apologise but mine didn't so don't be humble on my part lad).
The Indians also did not like our immigration policies as it hindered their people from coming here.
Now I believe in friendship with all countries and non interference in their internal policies so I would be grateful if India would extend the same rights to us as they demand from us.
British people are not allowed to emigrate to India. They can go on a work permit (on sufference) but not gain nationality unless they are of Indian stock. But this is not what Cameron and his pushy poodle Cable he of Indian wife fame wishes.
I am not against Indians, indeed of all non Europeans I prefer them but we must have impartiality and we can not sustain ANY increased population.
They are wanting a one way traffic, Indians to Britain, not the reverse even though per square mile we are more densely populated than India.
So Mr Cameron, you are no democrat. You are a dictator with no mandate from the British people to persue these policies. If they were likely to be of advantage to the AVERAGE British citizen I could POSSIBLY accept them, but they evidently do not.
Your policies only benefit your wealthy paymasters in the City of London and the increasingly non British section of the electorate to which you pander.
Give our country away and the wrath of the British people will be upon you, and in the downturn in our economy which is surely coming will test our patience you will reap the whirlwind.
WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)