HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE BURKA

Much has been made of the much maligned "Human Rights Act" and its relationship to the wearing of the burka.
The fact that this rights act should be maligned does not detract from the principle and justice of the concept of human rights. It is the way the concept is enacted and enforced which is the problem.

Let's break the concept down.

All people have the right to freedom of expression and movement in public places in their own country. We have the right to a decent environment fresh air and water.
All children have the right to protection, and sustenance as well as the opportunity for a decent education and equal chance to make their way as participants in society, and of course from arbitrary persecution and arrest by the State. In other words freedom.
Old people have the right, after their working days are over to a decent standard of living as have the disabled.
All these rights society has a duty to ensure and these rights should be cherished.

Now we come to other essential needs which are predicated on duty.
Food and shelter are essential for life, but the right to these involves the duty to work to provide them for people themselves and those who are not in a position to do so, either from disability, age or lack of opportunity.

The way in which the present Human Rights legislation is implemented does not guarantee those rights for the average citizen.
Criminals and terrorists often have greater rights than the law abiding. Our rights are infringed by terror laws which started as a reaction to islamic attacks and our right to walk freely in our towns curtaied by muslim groups who claim ownership to enclaves in our towns.
We are forbidden to complain about this take over of our country under draconian race laws which make making such complaints illegal as "discriminating" against these unasked for and unwanted invaders.


We are FORCED to pay taxes to support and house them while our people languish on waiting lists.
We are forced to see our towns become alien places their British character and feel swamped by this invasion from all over the world.
We are faced to pay taxes to subsidise these people who do not like us just to appease them in the hope that by doing so no more outrages are perpetrated.
We are forced to be disturbed by women walking down our streets dressed as black crows and the men in their ugly medieval garb and bearded faces.

WHAT ABOUT OUR RIGHTS?
Even Syria, a muslim country has banned the wearing of the burka as has Turkey.

Yes these people have also rights, but rights depend on not infringing on the rights of others.
And there are special rights belonging to us, the right to call this our country.
We have the right to complain at this turning of our country into a foreign land, as muslims have the right to object to our presence in their land.
They have the right to wear their funny clothes,
BUT NOT IN OUR COUNTRY.

If they want to dress in this garb, they have the right to go to to a country where it is the norm, BUT IT IS NOT THE NORM HERE.

AYO GORKHALI

All I can say is WELL DONE THAT MAN !

WIGAN PATRIOT SUPPORTS THE GURKHAS -

Gurkha ordered back to UK after beheading dead Taliban fighter :

"A Gurkha soldier has been flown back to the UK after hacking the head off a dead Taliban commander with his ceremonial knife to prove the dead man’s identity.

The private, from 1st Battalion, Royal Gurkha Rifles, was involved in a fierce firefight with insurgents in the Babaji area of central Helmand Province when the incident took place earlier this month.

His unit had been told that they were seeking a ‘high value target,’ a Taliban commander, and that they must prove they had killed the right man.

The Gurkhas had intended to remove the Taliban leader’s body from the battlefield for identification purposes.

But they came under heavy fire as their tried to do so. Military sources said that in the heat of battle, the Gurkha took out his curved kukri knife and beheaded the dead insurgent.

He is understood to have removed the man’s head from the area, leaving the rest of his body on the battlefield.

This is considered a gross insult to the Muslims of Afghanistan, who bury the entire body of their dead even if parts have to be retrieved.

British soldiers often return missing body parts once a battle has ended so the dead can be buried in one piece.

A source said: ‘Removing the head in this way was totally inappropriate.’

Army sources said that the soldier, who is in his early 20s, initially told investigators that he unsheathed his kukri – the symbolic weapon of the Gurkhas – after running out of ammunition.

But later the Taliban fighter was mutilated so his identity could be verified through DNA tests.

The source said: ‘The soldier has been removed from duty and flown home. There is no sense of glory involved here, more a sense of shame. He should not have done what he did.’

The incident, which is being investigated by senior commanders, is hugely embarrassing to the British Army, which is trying to build bridges with local Afghan communities who have spent decades under ­Taliban rule.

It comes just days after a rogue Afghan soldier murdered three British troops from the same Gurkha regiment.

If the Gurkha being investigated by the Army is found guilty of beheading the dead enemy soldier, he will have contravened the Geneva Conventions which dictate the rules of war. Soldiers are banned from demeaning their enemies.

The Gurkha now faces disciplinary action and a possible court martial. If found guilty, he could be jailed.

He is now confined to barracks at the Shorncliffe garrison, near Folkestone, Kent.

The incident happened as the Gurkha troop was advancing towards a hostile area before engaging the enemy in battle.

Colonel Richard Kemp, a former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, said: ‘In this case, it appears that the ­soldier was not acting maliciously, but his actions were clearly ill-judged.

‘The Gurkhas are a very fine regiment with a proud tradition of service in the British forces and have fought very bravely in Afghanistan.

'I have no doubt that this behaviour would be as strongly condemned by the other members of that regiment, as it would by all soldiers in the British forces.’

A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: ‘We are aware of an incident and have informed the Afghan authorities. An inves-t­igation is underway and it would not be appropriate to comment further until this is concluded.’

The Ministry also revealed yesterday that four British servicemen had been killed in Afghanistan in 24 hours.

An airman from the RAF Regiment died in a road accident near Camp Bastion in Helmand and a marine from 40 Commando Royal Marines was killed in an explosion in Sangin on Friday.

A Royal Dragoon Guard died in a blast in the Nahr-e Saraj district of Helmand Province yesterday. The fourth serviceman also died in an explosion.

The British death toll in the Afghan campaign since 2001 is now 322.

Afghan troops trained by the British Army recently led a major operation into a Taliban stronghold.

It was one of the first operations organised by the Afghan National Army.

Regiment’s proud symbol of valour

The iconic kukri knife used by the Gurkhas can be a weapon or a tool. It is the traditional utility knife of the Nepalese people, but is mainly known as a symbolic weapon for Gurkha regiments all over the world.

The kukri signifies courage and valour on the battlefield and is sometimes worn by bridegrooms during their wedding ceremony.

The kukri’s heavy blade enables the user to inflict deep wounds and to cut muscle and bone with one stroke.

It can also be used in stealth operations to slash an enemy’s throat, killing him instantly and silently.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1295617/Gurkha-ordered-UK-beheading-dead-Taliban-fighter.html

------------------

What chance do we have when we are told to fight a PC war against a Battle Hardened ISLAMIST TALIBAN?

GIVE THIS MAN MEDAL AND GET BEHIND HIM - SHOW HIM YOUR SUPPORT IN WHATEVER WAY YOU CAN.

MICKEY MOUSE TEACHING

The extravagence of teachers spending taxpayers money on so called educational trips even in these times of economic difficulties seems to know no bounds. The "educational" trips to Disneyland which cost about £500 for each teacher not counting flight and luxury hotel costs have even shocked SOME Labour councillors. The trips were of course taken in school time as teachers holidays are not long enough to fit these trips in and in any case they were work. The total costs for the four teachers from Abraham Guest school plus an unspecified number from the Deanery must run into several thousands of pounds. On top of that perhaps supply teachers had to be taken on to cover for the absent "working" teachers.

I know of schools in the area who lack books and other essential equipment but evidently this visit to Florida is more important than Maths, English and Physics.

As shown in the cutting below the course is full of meaningless jargon incorporating the word "skills" which is always a give away for PC nonsence. Knowledge is what schools should provide. You get "Skills" later in the workplace.

Those who authorised this jolly shold be sacked for wasting taxpayers money.

Do they really think one pupil (not student) will benefit in the slightest or gain a better pass mark?

Oh, perhaps they will as most courses nowadays at school and even university are aptly called "Mickey Mouse" qualifications and are thus useless in obtaining a job

AND YOU WONDER WHY SO MANY YOUNG PEOPLE ARE UNEMPLOYED.

I SUGGEST THESE TEACHERS JOIN THEM

CIVIL WAR - THE FUTURE OF EUROPE ?

Will you be ready for this ?





Islamists are already emboldened by the lack of Political Will to contain them.
We are already under attack yet nothing is said, serious Islamist and "RACIST" attacks upon us go largely unreported or under reported.
The Police turn on us when we complain, with jackboot and fist.
The powers that be drag us through the courts, enforce Islamists "RIGHTS" to call for murder and mayhem on our streets.
Allow our HEROIC SOLDIERS to be spat on and abused at their homecoming parades with Police Protection.
Those arrested are from the INDIGENOUS POPULATION when they try and fight back against their lands and people being abuse and dispossessd.
Isn't it time we stood up and be counted ?

The predicted future in the film need not happen.
It all depends on what Politics and Politicians do, and we know what they are doing and it's not in OUR INTERESTS.
We need Politicians who only have the best interests of the Country and People at it's heart.
Their is only one Political party who will be able to turn things around, but it needs everyone's support.
UNITED STAND, Divided we fall.

SUPERMARKET EXPLOITATION

Further to Nick Griffin's blog yesterday on the employment of foreign workers in South West Lancashire and their effect on local employment I will give my take on the matter.
Although having worked in medicine I have also been a farmer for 50 years.
I know the area well and know the area round Ormskirk and Southport to be as fertile and more productive per acre than the Fens although being smaller and further from London this fact is not recognised.

Most sorts of vegetable crops are grown there includinc carrots, sprouts, leeks and lettuces and many more.
Thirty years ago they were also grown there and harvested by locals with far less mechanisation than now is the case, so why are so many foreigners, legal and illegal employed now?
It is said the crops would not be harvested without these people, so what's the difference?
In a word supermarkets. As these businesses have become larger they have gained a stranglehold on local producers becoming the monopoly buyers and insisting on ever lower producer prices. These latter were obliged to take the cheapest labour possible in order to survive. Once one farmer had this cheap labour others had to follow or go out of business.
Wages lower than the minimum wage could be paid. Workers are housed in cheap houses, many living in one house or even caravan, thus avoiding the costs that British workers incur such as rent and council taxes, let alone bringing up a family.
I know of a case of a Polish girl who became pregnant and returned to Poland and had all maternity benefits paid in Poland even though she had only been in this country a matter of months.

In another instance, when I retired from medicine I took cattle in to the local abbatoir each week. The owner, a nice man was unable to retain his staff as he could not pay them enough while in competition with other firms who employed immigrants.

One day perhaps 12 years ago when I took my cattle in he asked me if I would give a medical to a new worker. This man and his fellow Polish worker were housed in a caravan by the midden next to the slaughterhouse and therefore avoided the usual housing costs. Their meagre wages did not prevent one of them being prosecuted for drunkenness after purchasing vodka at a local supermarket.
This I did although the worker's inability to speak English made it difficult and there was no one to translate. I asked the boss how his new worker pronounced his name and he replied tongue in cheek "I dont think, looking at the spelling he can pronounce it"
The Polish men were OK and at the time the immigration tsunami had not started in earnest.
I did not realise that this was the start of a massive invasion of cheap labour. I suppose I was complicit in this although at the time I did not realise the seriousness of what was about to hit us.

So the question. How did we manage before and what benefit has this influx been to our people?
Well supermarket profits and margins have gone up as has their share price. Prices to the consumer have not gone down.
The benefits have been gained by big business like Sainsbury's and Tesco's and the losses have been sustained by our young people who languish on the dole, being unable to survive on the meagre wages these immigrants can survive on.
They say the British people will not work. They did before when they had the chance.These jobs were done by us 30 years ago and could be now.
Thus we all pay higher taxes to support them on the dole, the supermarkets make their profits and give generous donations to the Tories and Labour which in turn give them preference in planning permissions, further driving small firms out of business.
It is globalisation in microcosm in a small rural area. A portent of the furure for all people if not halted.
We are becoming units like chess pieces to be moved about at the will of big business.

So where is our freedom when multinational companies rule governments and their profits take precedence over the well being of the people?

WHO CONTROLS THE NUJ and the NUT?

This is taken from the SWP website.
It may go some way to explaining WHY the BNP will never get Fair Treatment and WHY the NEWS in the Papers and on TV and Radio is little more than PROPAGANDA.
And why Britains children are being dumbed down and Indoctrinated.
It doesn't say a lot but you need to view it as to who is working with who.

"BBC mass meetings against attacks on pay and pensions: The NUJ, BECTU and Unite have called mass meetings at BBC workplaces across the country.
The meetings have been angry, well attended, and have voted, in many places almost unanimously for a ballot for strike action. So far there have been meetings at Birmingham, Cardiff, TVC London, Bush House London, Bristol, Belfast, White City London, and Broadcasting house London. Last week we managed to put in a Socialist Worker leaflet to most of these workplaces.
This week we must try and revisit all these workplaces with the paper and an updated leaflet (which will be sent out), as well as getting down to leaflet the workplace meetings in Manchester (Thursday) and Glasgow (Wednesday).
Union leaders will meet on the 19th July at the NUJ headquarters in London to discuss outcome of mass meetings."

Teaching..
In Barnsley the trade’s council, NUT & UCU locally have already put on a coach to Birmingham while in Oxford the local Unison NHS branch has put on a coach. London Region UCU, Birmingham NUT, Islington Association of the NUT, Islington 6th Form Centre NUT have all passed motions of support for the 3 October demonstration in the last week.
Coaches are already booked South London, Central London, Hackney, Leeds, Glasgow, Edinburgh & Dundee.
Affiliations continue to come in for RtW despite the summer holidays, East Cheshire Unison, Wigan Unison & Unite Staff Ericsson Coventry affiliated to RtW over the last week...
While the NUT's Christine Blower is calling for a representative from each school there is obviously room for a much greater mobilisation.
In EVERY SCHOOL.

Marxism has been deeply embeded within the Education system, Media, Local Governement, the Unions, etc.
No wonder they won't give us a level playing field. After all they decide what is shown and reported in Britains Newspapers and TV News.
SWP, the real "Enemy Within" ?

FRIDAY PRAYERS - ISLAMIST RACISTS AND CHILD BRIDES IN LANCASHIRE

Accrington forced marriage row pair locked up

TWO of three men involved in a confrontation with police and a social worker after a schoolgirl complained she might be being lined up for a forced marriage are behind bars.

Burnley Crown Court heard police were abused and ended up calling for back-up at a house in Accrington.

The social worker, who was threatened with death and racially insulted, said it was the worst incident she had ever had to suffer in her job.

Khalid Hussain, 24, of Ormerod Street, Accrington and Majid Hussain, 23, of Great Townley Street, Preston, admitted using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour.

Mohammed Liaqat, 19, also of Ormerod Street, Accrington, pleaded guilty to causing racially aggravated fear of violence.

Khalid Hussain, who was sent to jail for two years in April for another offence, was said by Judge Andrew Woolman to be ‘proving a trouble to the community’.

He and Liaqat were given four months in custody each.

Majid Hussain got four months in prison, suspended for two years with 120 hours’ unpaid work.

Sergey Prokofiev, prosecuting, said last August the girl was removed from her home and two police officers and the social worker went to speak to her relations.

Initial discussions seemed quite amicable but Liaqat claimed the girl was being held against her will and demanded she be returned to her family home.

Majid Hussain was vociferous in stating she had been in contact with her relations.

Mr Prokofiev said Hussain and Liaqat went towards the officers shouting abuse and they and the social worker got up to leave.

Khalid Hussain ran into the room with a mobile phone, insisting the officers see what was on the phone and was rude and aggressive.

The prosecutor said Liaqat approached the social worker’s vehicle, and said to her: ‘I am going to kill you.' He then made a cut throat motion.

Majid Hussain said the family was fed up because officers were not listening to them when they claimed the girl had been in touch.