WILDERS' SPEECH IN DENMARK

While he was in Denmark, Geert Wilders didn’t just give the interview shown below where he said we will have to deport millions of Muslims: he also gave the following speech. This is just so you know, red, that it’s not only here in the UK that people like us are winning and people like you are losing: it’s all across the Western world. Get used to it because it isn’t going to change any time soon. Holland can expect a Freedom Party (PVV) government in the near future, and you, and we, here in Britain can expect a nationalist government in that same near future. People all over Europe have had enough of the antics of you and people like you. You might as well just lie back and enjoy it.

Wilders speech in Denmark

Let's start with a little humor from Geert Wilders's speech to the Danish Free Press Society in Copenhagen, June 14:

“I will not terribly miss Jacqui Smith, the British cabinet member that worked so hard to have me refused in the UK because of my film Fitna. It is rather ironic that her career-ending was somehow film-related, as it turned out the British taxpayer had to pay for the porn-movies her husband rented. At least, we cannot say she is a movie-hater as such. Just her taste is a little bit selective.”

The speech is good and worth reading. While it covers ground similar to his speech in Florida last month, Wilders keeps hitting harder and harder, as in his attack on the European political elite in the wake of the European Parliament elections. He says very plainly that this is a war for survival, that Islam and its ally the European elite are seeking to destroy Europe, and that we must defeat them.

Here is the speech, from the website of the Dutch Freedom Party:

Ladies and gentlemen,
Thank you, Danish Free Press Society, again for inviting me to speak to you here in Copenhagen. It is good to be back in Denmark. Thank you, my friend, Lars Hedegaard.

And last but not least, I thank the Danish border police for having allowed me into the country.

Ladies and gentlemen, last week was a tremendous week. My party, the Dutch Freedom Party, came second in the Dutch elections for the European Parliament! In many cities, including Rotterdam and The Hague, we even managed to become the largest party!

Meanwhile here in Denmark, the Danish People's Party again performed very well, which is excellent news for Denmark. I congratulate Pia Kjaesgaard and Morten Messerschmidt on their party's victory. Marvellous news!

There is more good news these days. In Europe the socialists--or social democrats, as they prefer to call themselves--lost nearly everywhere: in the Netherlands, in Belgium, in Germany, in Austria, in France, in Spain, in Italy and, perhaps best of all, in the United Kingdom. The greatest coward in Europe, the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, suffered a tremendous blow at the hands of the British electorate. Serves him right!

I will not terribly miss Jacqui Smith, the British cabinet member that worked so hard to have me refused in the UK because of my film Fitna. It is rather ironic that her career-ending was somehow film-related, as it turned out the British taxpayer had to pay for the porn-movies her husband rented. At least, we cannot say she is a movie-hater as such. Just her taste is a little bit selective.

Why is it good news that the socialists lost by such a margin?

Let me answer this myself. It's good news because socialists are the most inveterate cultural relativists in Europe. They regard the Islamic culture of backwardness and violence as equal to our Western culture of freedom, democracy and human rights. In fact, it is the socialists who are responsible for mass immigration, Islamization and general decay of our cities and societies. It are the socialists who are responsible for the fact that cities such as Rotterdam, Marseille and Malmo seem to be situated in Eurabia rather than in Europe. And they are even proud of it.

Our Western elite, whether it are politicians, journalists or judges, have lost their way completely. All sense of reality has vanished. All common sense has been thrown to the wind. They take all efforts to deny the things that take place in front of our eyes, and deny everything that is so obviously seen by everyone else.

They won't stand firm on any issue. Their cultural relativism affects absolutely everything up to the point where they no longer see the difference between good and evil, or between nonsense and logical common sense. Everything is pushed into a grey area, a foggy marsh without beginning or end. The only moral standard they still seem to apply is the question whether or not it is approved by Muslims. Everything Muslims disapprove, they disapprove too.

And so, the voters have had enough. Because they of course realise that Europe is going in the wrong direction. They know that there are enormous problems with Islam in Europe. They are well aware of the identity of those who are taking them for a ride, namely, the Shariah socialists.

As for those present here today, I'm sure everyone knows how intractable the problems with Islam are in Europe, given that Muslims are over-represented in crime rate figures as well as in social benefit statistics. Of course, this is not to say that there aren't many Muslims of good will who are decent, law-abiding citizens. But facts are facts.

According to the Dutch Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, mass immigration has to date cost the Dutch taxpayer more than one hundred billion Euros. According to the Danish national bank, every Danish Muslim immigrant costs the Danish state more than 300,000 Euros. A Swedish economist has calculated that mass immigration costs the Swedish taxpayer twenty-seven billion dollars annually. In Norway a warning has been issued to the effect that the proceeds from North Sea oil will have to be spent entirely on mass immigration, while in France official figures have been published suggesting that mass immigration is reducing growth in the French economy by two-thirds. In other words, mass immigration, demographic developments and Islamization are certainly partly causes of Europe's steadily increasing impoverishment and decay.

Ladies and gentlemen, you may know of the Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels, who recently said that Muslim integration in the West is simply impossible. Now, that is not a novel idea. A certain Frenchman said pretty much the same thing in 1959. I quote, "Those who recommend integration must be considered pea-brained even if they are scholars and scientists. Just try mixing oil and vinegar. Then shake the bottle. After a moment the two substances will separate again. Do you really believe French society could absorb ten million Muslims, who would be twenty million tomorrow and forty million the day after? In fact, my own village would no longer be Colombey-les-deux-Eglises but would rather come to be known as Colombey-les-deux-mosques."

This quote, you guessed it, is from none other than the former French President Charles de Gaulle.

Now, I do not know whether Sennels and De Gaulle were right in their conclusion that Muslims are incapable of integrating into other cultures. I think in reality we do see Muslims on individual level assimilating into our societies. But what I do know is that very many Muslims do not want to integrate.

Again, the facts don't lie: four in ten British Muslim students want Sharia law to be implemented, while one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. Seven out of ten Spanish Muslims consider their self a Muslim first, instead of a Spanish citizen. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks, half of Dutch Muslims admit to 'understanding' the 9/11 attacks. Seven out of ten youth prisoners here in Copenhagen are Muslim. In 2005, 82 percent of the crimes in Copenhagen were committed by immigrants, many of them Muslim. More than half of the Danish Muslims think that it should be forbidden to criticise Islam and two out of three Danish Muslims think that free speech should be curtailed.

Some time ago an interview was held in France with the French Muslim student Mohamed Sabaoui, who said the following, and I quote:

"Your laws do not coincide with the Koran, Muslims can only be ruled by Shariah law. We will declare Roubaix an independent Muslim enclave and impose Shariah Law upon all its citizens. We will be your Trojan Horse, we will rule, Allah akbar." End of quote.

Ladies and gentlemen, make no mistake: Islam has always attempted to conquer Europe. Spain fell in the 8th century, Constantinople fell in the 15th century, even Vienna and Poland were threatened, and now, in the 21st century, Islam is trying again. This time not with armies, but through the application of Al-Hijra, the Islamic doctrine of migration and demography.

Unfortunately, the Al-Hijra doctrine is very successful. For the first time in world history there are dozens of millions of Muslims living far outside the Dar al-Islam, the Islamic world. Al-Hijra may be the end of European civilization as we know it: The second Dutch city, Rotterdam, will have a non-Western majority within 3 years. Europe has now more than 50 million Muslims, it is expected that this will be doubled in just 20 years. By 2025, one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families.

As I said, many of those Muslims in Europe would like to implement Shariah Law in our judicial systems. As you know, Shariah law covers all areas of life, from religion, hygiene and dietary laws, to dress code, family and social life and from finance and politics to the unity of Islam with the state. For some crimes, horrific, barbaric punishments are prescribed, such as beheading and the chopping off of opposite limbs. In Shariah Courts no woman may become judge. Shariah Law does not recognize free speech and freedom of religion. Polygamy and killing an apostate are 'virtues', but the consumption of alcohol is a crime. This is the sick Shariah Law in a nutshell, and it is unbelievable and unacceptable that the cultural relativists allow Shariah banks, Shariah mortgages, Shariah schools and unofficial--and in Britain even official--Shariah tribunals in Europe.

Ladies and gentlemen, these are of course shocking facts, figures and statements. However, they are not particularly surprising to anybody who has some knowledge of the Koran and knows who Muhammad was.

In this connection, ladies and gentlemen, allow me to very briefly discuss the essence of Islam, and let me come straight to the point: Islam is not so much a religion as, first and foremost, an ideology; to be precise, like communism and fascism, a political, totalitarian ideology, with worldwide aspirations.

Of course, there are many moderate Muslims. However, there is no such a thing as a moderate Islam. Islam's heart lies in the Koran. The Koran is an evil book that calls for violence, murder, terrorism, war and submission. The Koran describes Jews as monkeys and pigs. The Koran calls upon Muslims to kill the Kaffirs, the non-Muslims.

The problem is that the injunctions in the Koran are not restricted to time or place. Rather, they apply to all Muslims, in any period. Another problem is that Muslims also regard the Koran as the word of Allah. Which means that the Koran is immune from criticism.

Apart from the Koran, there is also the life of Muhammad, who fought in dozens of wars and was in the habit of decapitating Jews with his own sword. The problem here is that, to Muslims, Muhammad is 'the perfect man', whose life is the model to follow.

This is why Jihadists slaughtered innocent people in Washington, New York, Madrid, Amsterdam, London and Mumbai.

Now is clear why Winston Churchill, in his book 'The second world war', for which he received the Nobel Prize in Literature, compared the Koran to Adolf Hitler's 'Mein Kampf'. Now is clear why the famous Swiss theologian, Karl Barth, in 1936 said, and I quote, "It is impossible to understand national socialism unless we see it in fact as a new Islam, its myth as a new Allah, and Hitler as this new Allah's prophet." Now is clear why Heinrich Himmler was an admirer of Islam. And now is clear why President Obama, who last week, in Cairo, said that Islam has a tradition of tolerance, should be sent back to school.

Just like communism, fascism and nazism, Islam is a threat to everything we stand for. It is a threat to democracy, to the constitutional state, to equality for men and women, to freedom and civilisation. Wherever you look in the world, the more Islam you see, the less freedom you see. Islam is a threat to the Europe of Bach and Michelangelo, Shakespeare and Socrates, Voltaire and Galileo.

Ladies and gentlemen, there is one Western country that has been forced to fight for its values since the very first day of its existence: Israel the canary in the coal mine. Let me say a few words about that wonderful country.

Like Bosnia, Kosovo, Nigeria, Sudan, the Caucasus, Kashmir, southern Thailand, Western China and the south of the Philippines, Israel is situated exactly on the dividing line between Dar al-Islam, the Islamic world, and Dar al-Harb, the non-Islamic world. It is no coincidence that it is precisely this dividing line where blood is flowing. All those conflicts concern the Jihad, Jihad in the spirit of the barbarian Muhammad.

Islam forces Israel to fight. The so called 'Middle East conflict' is not at all a conflict about land. It is not about some inches of land in Gaza, Judea or Samaria. It is a conflict about ideologies, it is a battle between freedom and Islam, a battle between good and evil, to Islam the whole of Israel is occupied territory. To Islam Tel Aviv and Haifa are settlements too.

Israel is the only democracy in the entire Middle-East. Israel is an oasis of enlightment, whereas the rest of the Middle-East is covered by the black veil of the night. This is no coincidence, in 1939 Winston Churchill said about the Jews in what is now called Israel: "They have made the desert bloom."

Ladies and gentlemen, I am very much in favour of a two-state solution. One Jewish state called Israel including Judea and Samaria and one Palestinian state called Jordan.

Ladies and gentlemen, wherever Islam and cultural relativism, advocated by Shariah-socialists, come together, freedom of expression is threatened. In Europe in particular, freedom of expression is at risk. As you may know, I am being prosecuted in the Netherlands for expressing my opinion, while being banned from the United Kingdom for the same reason. But, of course, this whole matter is not only about me. There is an ongoing Jihad against free speech in the whole of Europe. In Austria, for example, a lady politician was prosecuted for having spoken the truth about Muhammad. The truth, mind you! We have also had the Danish cartoon crisis; not to mention the threats and/or killing of people as Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Pim Fortuyn, Theo van Gogh, Oriana Fallaci and my brave friend Wafa Sultan. In the Netherlands a cartoonist was arrested by no fewer than ten policemen for having made some drawings! I could go on, but I won't because it would make you sick.

Ladies and gentlemen, I strongly suggest that we should defend freedom of speech, with all our strength. Free speech is the most important of all our many civil rights. Free speech is the cornerstone of our modern free societies. Without free speech there is no democracy, no freedom. It is our obligation to defend free speech. It is our obligation to preserve the heritage of the British Magna Charta and the French Declaration of the rights of Man. It is our obligation to defend the American Bill of rights and the Universal Declaration of Human rights.

Human rights protect the freedom of individuals but they do not protect ideologies. I propose two things:

I propose a boycott of the UN Human rights Council. Annually this Council adopts resolutions that attempt to kill free speech and the concept of human rights. Let there be no mistake about it, the UN Human rights Council is a threat to free speech in the West.

I propose to repeal all hate speech laws in Europe. These laws enable radical Muslims to silence those critical of Islam. Free speech should be extended instead of restricted in Europe. We should consider laws comparable to the American First Amendment.

Unfortunately, however, if we really wish to combat the Islamization of Europe effectively, we will have to do more than guard or extend freedom of speech. In this regard it is my firm conviction that we will have to take the following measures:

First, we will have to end all forms of cultural relativism. For this purpose we will need an amendment to our constitutions stating that our European cultural foundation is Judeo-Christian and Humanistic in nature. To the cultural relativists, the Shariah-socialists, I would proudly say, "Our Western culture is superior to Islamic culture." Or to quote Wafa Sultan when she compared the Western culture with Islam: "It's not a clash of civilizations, it's a clash between barbarity and reason." I fully agree with her.

Second, we will have to stop mass immigration from Muslim countries and promote voluntary repatriation.

Third, we will have to expel criminal foreigners and, following denaturalisation, criminals with dual nationality. I have a clear message to all mulsims in our societies: if you subscribe to our laws, values and constitution you are very welcome to stay and we will even help you to assimilate. But if you cross the red line and commit crimes, start thinking and acting like jihad or sharia we will expel you the same out of our countries.

Fourth, we will have to close down all Islamic schools for they are fascist institutions, to prevent any further indoctrination of young children with an ideology of violence and hatred.

Fifth, we will have to close down all radical, and forbid the construction of any new, mosques; there is enough Islam in Europe. Besides that, as long as Christians in Turkey, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Indonesia are treated in the scandalous ways they currently are, and as long as no permission is given for churches to be built or bibles to be sold in, for example, Saudi Arabia, there should be a mosque building-stop in the West.

Sixth, last but not least, we will have to get rid of all those cowardly so-called leaders. We enjoy the privilege of living in a democracy. Let's use that privilege by replacing cowards with heroes. Let's have fewer Chamberlains and more Churchills. Lets elect real leaders.

In short, ladies and gentlemen, my main message of today is that we have to start fighting back.

No defence, but offence. We have to fight back and demonstrate that millions of people are sick and tired of it all and refuse to take any more. We must make it clear that millions of freedom-loving people are saying 'enough is enough'.

Ladies and gentlemen, Europe is at the crossroads once again. We either choose the road to darkness or the road to freedom.

My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. My generation does not own this freedom, we are merely its custodians. We cannot strike a deal with Mullahs and imams. We cannot surrender and give up our liberties, we simply do not have the right to do so.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are in the winning mood! Cultural relativists and Shariah-socialists are losing, freedom loving people are winning. Things are changing for the better.

Ladies and gentlemen, and I leave you with this: We will never give in, we will never give up, we will never surrender, we have to win, and we will win!

Thank you very much.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/

And here’s another item from the same page:

Griffin interview on BBC
Two days ago, a commenter from England pointed out that Nick Griffin told a BBC radio interviewer the morning after his election to the European Parliament that he didn’t want to talk about race and immigration but other issues. The impression was created that as soon as Griffin had won a political seat, he began “going mainstream.” I listened to the interview last evening and I disagree. Griffin didn’t run away from immigration and race at all. The interviewer was essentially mugging him for seven or eight minutes on the race issue and Griffin kept coming back with excellent responses. It’s clear that he has a thought-out, coherent position on these matters and that every attempt to smear and discredit him only gives him an opportunity to display it. The fact that Griffin gets tired of being called a racist, and that he does have other concerns besides immigration, hardly represents the sell-out of which the commenter was accusing him.

Morg
.

THE GOOD, AND THE BAD UGLY

Question? Who would you trust to run our country?

The man below who wins 130,000 votes in the North West in spite of a concerted campaign by the media of half truths and usually downright lies.

A man when, after being elected is attacked by thugs when he tries to hold a press conference in a so called free country

Or this man below subsidised to thwart free speech and who advocates violence against an elected MEP.

This man has been given a platform in "The Times" to spout his vile hate filled invective, lies and incitement to violence. A man of no merit at all who scratches a living, subsidised by the far Left enemies of Britain and by his own admission does not believe in democracy for those with whom he disagrees.

Cambridge law graduate Nick Griffin is given no right of reply in the press.
Mr Bennett will not debate with Mr Griffin. Do you wonder why? Nick would bury him as Simon Darby did on a radio talk in.

The fact that Nick Griffin has a glass eye is mocked in the press, as if a visual disability had any bearing on his undoubted ability.

Can you not see Weyman that you are being used by the "Establishment" to destroy this country? Perhaps you are too thick. Perhaps that's what you want.

Nick Griffin is an intellectual giant, unlike you. You are an intellectual minnow, and while we are on about Nick's glass eye he is, in spite of it good looking and you are ugly, very ugly.

YOU ARE OUTCLASSED IN EVERY WAY, WEYMAN, BRAINS, LOOKS AND ABILITY.

SO GO BACK TO YOUR CAVE!

GEERT WILDERS - DEPORT MILLIONS OF MUSLIMS

Oh dear - now watch Weyman Bennet and his ilk go ... er ... bananas.

Watch it all - it's only the first few seconds that's not in English.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-akx0O7sUfA&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsheikyermami%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded


Morg
.

POINTLESS JOB OF THE WEEK

"This week’s pointless job: Wigan council is looking for a senior European policy officer (up to £33,328) to represent the interests of Wigan in Brussels.

Isn’t that what the people of Wigan and the rest of the northwest just elected eight MEPs to do? "

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6493534.ece

What do we reckon the chances are that the position will be given to someone of graduate level? A Common Purpose "graduate", that is.

I guess the expenses file might be interesting to read in a year or two. It'll certainly be worth a FoI request.

And it will get one.

*Hat tip to Tony

Morg.

MCGEE BEHEADER CHARGED WITH MURDER

The man - apparently an immigrant - who beheaded 63 yr-old Patrick McGee here in Greater Manchester in December last year (to a virtual press blackout), was charged with murder - to a total press blackout - on April 29th this year.

There is a plea and management hearing at Manchester Crown Court on July 3rd next. Would anyone care to give me a lift there on that date so we can get a look at him ... reply in the comments, or email me via my contributor button.

Read here for what sparse information is available. The fact that there seems to be an attempt to keep this quiet tells me we ought to be highlighting it. It is obviously causing embarrassment to the "authorities".

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013403.html

Here is all the other information publicly available about this case

http://www.google.com/cse?cx=001570561176820765327%3Aalym_hnorag&ie=UTF-8&q=Patrick+Mcgee&sa=Search

Morg
.

BLACK PUDDINGS AND BULLSHIT

The disgraceful incitement to violence today in the Daily Star must surely be countered and persued by our legal team.

To offer a prize for throwing a curry at Nick Griffin is beyond the Pale.
I could think of many objects I could throw at people with whom I disagree such as--

A Black pudding filled with pigs blood at a muslim --or

A bag of bullshit plus a black pudding (make of that what you will) at Weyman Bennett,--or

A load of bulls bollocks at the man Smith(I think) of the uaf.

And I can get hold of these items easily.

But I don't and won't as it would be a waste of good food and material and besides it would not prove any point.

We believe in free speech and not violence. Violence is to be deprecated and proves nothing But if actual physical attacks are instigated and take place--
Two can play at that game.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

MORE PROGRESS

On and on it goes, our progress and free publicity. Having won two seats democratically the losers (in more ways than one) are still jumping up and down and trying to silence us.

People see through their antics and can now see who the thugs are.
All we want is the right to put our views to the public.
This poses a dilemma for the chattering champagne socialists and the Tories.

On the one hand they have said that exposing our views to scrutiny would result in us being exposed and destroyed in debate.
On the other they say they must not give us "the oxygen of publicity".

Why? You can't have it both ways. Either you have confidence in the superiority of your arguments in which case you debate or you have not in which case you stifle debate.
It seems the latter is the case. Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons have demolished the media cretins and shown them up for what they are. What has happened is that they have been beaten in the public domain, and they don't like it.
What to do? Call in the thugs to prevent free speech. Attack MEPs giving a press conference.

One thing the British people (you know who I mean) do not like is the attacking of free speech and thus the State and media sponsored thugs show themselves up again and lose what little credibility they had.
Their methods are not working and we are gaining sympathy if not support. What to do?

Step in the Tories who suggest impartial reporting should be curtailed lest people be persuaded of our cause. People could even be tempted to vote for this party in the future. Can't have that.
Our illustrious Prime Minister (he who in a former life bankrupted our country, destroyed its cohesion and industry)concurrs with this view.

The BNP must be stopped at all costs.
Perhaps we could change the electoral system to prevent the BNP ever gaining influence.

I'm sure they are looking at ways of effectively banning us.
If so I advise them to beware. We believe in a democratic choice and will not give it up. We will not accept dictatorship.

If we are prevented from having a democratic input into society it will not stop us wanting it and pressures will build up.
If the ordinary people are not allowed to have their democratic say we will have it in other ways.

We don't want civil strife but peaceful debate, but if as the uaf have threatened to "hound" us there will be a backlash and it will not be a few eggs that are thrown.
We will not give in. We are tough. They are mummy's boys and hippies. Fight physically and you will lose.
Fight in the debating chamber and you will also lose.

We are on our way and there is nothing you can do.

SO ACCEPT THE NEW REALITY.


PS "Lord Smith had to beat a hasty retreat in Leigh last week when distributing the lie filled "hype not hate" pamphlet.

On being questioned about the lies in his leaflet he refused to discuss them saying "I dont have to talk to you". Spoken like a true democrat and representitive of the people. Refuse to talk and threaten to call the police, before beating a hasty retreat.

The best place for you your Lordship is in the house of Lords where you can snooze on expenses without being bothered by irritating questions from the voters.

To coin a phrase "useless Lord off our streets". There is no place in Wigan or Leigh for deadlegs like you. The people don't want you.

SO B****R OFF.