One of the people who I detest the most is Peter Hain.
Some years ago, before he inveigled his way into a senior position in British politics and was just an agitator for things of no concerns to us I thought I would have had a chance to meet him.
It was at the time of a South Africa rugby tour and it was thought that a match would have been played at our local rugby club , Orrell and he threatened to disrupt it.
Although not a violent man I was relishing the chance to meet this anti democratic man and with my co club members educating him by combatting violence with violence. I looked forward to introducing his face to my fist.
In the event the match was cancelled and he was lucky, although no doubt he does not know how lucky he was.
So I am in the peculior position now of being on his side.
He is in court for the crime of criticising a judge.
It seems according to an ancient law that judges can not be criticised and he is to be prosecuted for this.
Now I did not realise that judges were above the law.
What right have they to have this position and who chooses them?
At school some go in for useful subjects such as engineering, science, medicine, trades etc and however well qualified they become they are held responsible for their actions and sometimes negligence.
Only last week a plumber, a skilled man with much experience was jailed for faulty workmanship which resulted in a death.
Doctors are often sued for negligence or mistakes.
But Judges are never, and it seems can never be sued for their mistakes.
How many times have you heard that a judge has released a criminal who goes on to kill someone or been judged to have wrongly directed a jury which resulted in an innocent man being incarcerated?
Why are these judges seemingly above the law?
They don't make it. That is Parliament's job and often they interpret laws made by Parliament in a way that Parliament and the people did not want.
Why have they so much power? Often they are out of touch with reality, living in ivory towers and not as clever as they would have us believe.
They are certainly not as clever as scientists and engineers but under our system they have the clout and influence to over ride the interests of the people and democracy itself.
Is it not time we curtailed the influence of these arrogant out of touch nonentities and made the system more democratic?
I used to respect the law of our land and the impartiality of our judiciary but after recent cases of judges over ruling Parliament I have lost that respect.
I do not hold our justice system in contempt,---
BUT THE JUDGES?
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
THE RAPE OF THE PEOPLE
Political events in Europe are moving at an increasing pace.
The refusal of Geert Wilders to ratify the austerity programme asked by the EU on the Dutch Parliament has precipitated the resignation of the Dutch Prime Minister and an election in a couple of months.
Hopefully Wilders will as seems likely consolidate his power.
This, with the French presidential elections likely to result in a president at least likely to challenge many of the austerity requirements imposed by Germany will be another nail in the coffin of the EU.
The Greek economy is still weakening and Spain has record unemployment and the situation in Italy is worsening.
And the facts are that austerity is not necessary, the debts are caused by corrupt banking practices. No austerity is envisioned for them.
We are witnessing a slow break up of the existing EU set up while the leaders are throwing borrowed money at this failed concept to keep it going, in spite of increasing antipathy of the people of Europe.
These governments are prepared to impoverish their peoples, not for the sake of future prosperity but for the sake of their internationalist dream and banker friends.
A good question would be. In whose interest are these so called leaders acting? They are supposed to be democratic but are certainly not acting according to the wishes or interests of the people.
Some of it may be pride, not wishing to admit they were wrong but there is another reason.
The leaders are in hock to the banking interests which feed parasite like on the populace, interests which are dependent on globalisation and internationalism. This last in turn depends on reducing national spirit and cohesion and thus immigration is encouraged and free speech opposing this treachery curtailed in the press and prosecuted in law.
This week the unholy alliance of the media barons in this country is being exposed in the courts, but this cosy relationship was just as rampant in the Labour administration.
That just a few wealthy news magnates can influence and dictate policy shows the degree to which we have lost our democracy.
In an effort to keep the whole Euro shambles on the road countries are being asked to "lend" money to the IMF which will later be lent to the EU. We are told by Osborne that his loan of £10 billion is safe and we will be paid interest on it. He does not say how much interest we will receive and if it is such a good thing, why not lend £100 billion.
The USA and canada have refused to take part in this good investment. Why?
It could be asked where this money is coming from given that we owe £billions to creditors and small businesses are starved of cash.
It is just throwing good money our money after bad for no good reason apart from attempting to achieve the impossible task of saving this rotten organisation.
But the good news is that the peoples of Europe are starting to realise this great con and to rebel.
If they are thwarted politically, violence could ensue but the parasitic bankers who control the EU and their lackeys in power at present will try to hold on to the end.
But make no mistake if matters continue as they are doing the people will have their revenge.
And it may not be pretty.
The refusal of Geert Wilders to ratify the austerity programme asked by the EU on the Dutch Parliament has precipitated the resignation of the Dutch Prime Minister and an election in a couple of months.
Hopefully Wilders will as seems likely consolidate his power.
This, with the French presidential elections likely to result in a president at least likely to challenge many of the austerity requirements imposed by Germany will be another nail in the coffin of the EU.
The Greek economy is still weakening and Spain has record unemployment and the situation in Italy is worsening.
And the facts are that austerity is not necessary, the debts are caused by corrupt banking practices. No austerity is envisioned for them.
We are witnessing a slow break up of the existing EU set up while the leaders are throwing borrowed money at this failed concept to keep it going, in spite of increasing antipathy of the people of Europe.
These governments are prepared to impoverish their peoples, not for the sake of future prosperity but for the sake of their internationalist dream and banker friends.
A good question would be. In whose interest are these so called leaders acting? They are supposed to be democratic but are certainly not acting according to the wishes or interests of the people.
Some of it may be pride, not wishing to admit they were wrong but there is another reason.
The leaders are in hock to the banking interests which feed parasite like on the populace, interests which are dependent on globalisation and internationalism. This last in turn depends on reducing national spirit and cohesion and thus immigration is encouraged and free speech opposing this treachery curtailed in the press and prosecuted in law.
This week the unholy alliance of the media barons in this country is being exposed in the courts, but this cosy relationship was just as rampant in the Labour administration.
That just a few wealthy news magnates can influence and dictate policy shows the degree to which we have lost our democracy.
In an effort to keep the whole Euro shambles on the road countries are being asked to "lend" money to the IMF which will later be lent to the EU. We are told by Osborne that his loan of £10 billion is safe and we will be paid interest on it. He does not say how much interest we will receive and if it is such a good thing, why not lend £100 billion.
The USA and canada have refused to take part in this good investment. Why?
It could be asked where this money is coming from given that we owe £billions to creditors and small businesses are starved of cash.
It is just throwing good money our money after bad for no good reason apart from attempting to achieve the impossible task of saving this rotten organisation.
But the good news is that the peoples of Europe are starting to realise this great con and to rebel.
If they are thwarted politically, violence could ensue but the parasitic bankers who control the EU and their lackeys in power at present will try to hold on to the end.
But make no mistake if matters continue as they are doing the people will have their revenge.
And it may not be pretty.
Monday, 23 April 2012
CONGRATULATIONS MARINE LE PEN.
The excellent showing of Marine Le Pen in the French presidential elections has made my day.
In spite of Sarkozy's attempts to reduce her vote by promising tougher immigration laws she has made good progress, unfortunately not enough to get her in to the second round but certainly enough to frighten the other candidates and on this side of the Channel the BBC and other lefty media organisations.
It is a sign that the people of Europe are becoming aware of the betrayal of the political class and they resent it. It will also give the FN more influence in French politics.
Whoever eventually gets in they will have to take into consideration the French patriots who are finally getting their act together.
In other European countries Nationalist parties will take heart and hopefully capitalise on the resurgance of patriotism enough to halt and reverse the colonisation visited on our continent by the venal traitors at present in power.
But what about the second round, the one which actually chooses the President?
Should Le Pen supporters back the Leftist Hollande in order to get rid of the despicable liar Sarkozy, or should they back Sarkozy in order to halt some of the dafter ideas of Hollande?
Much as I disagree with many of the policies of Hollande his election could hasten the break up of the EU and whatever else that must be a good thing.
With Sarkozy they will get more of the same and national identity subsumed into the morass of the EU.
So I hope Le Pen's voters stay at home in the second round and let Hollande get in, a small price to pay for the demise of the EU.
BUT, where is our Le Pen?
The BNP had a chance of changing British politics for the better, but that has been squandered by the present leadership and the party is just ignored in spite of the general disillusionment with the "main" parties.
If Griffin was a true patriot he would have long ago put his personal ambitions aside in the nation's interests.
But is he a true patriot?
Is he even on our side or working for the State?
I don't know but with him a block to any nationalist revival our beliefs will get nowhere.
Perhaps, after the local elections and the inevitable hammering the BNP candidates will get he will stand down, but I doubt it and we of patriotic beliefs will see our country sink further into the abyss without being able to do anything about it.
We need a new charismatic leader AND FAST.
The potential for a nationalist revival is there as in France but without leadership we will get nowhere.
In spite of Sarkozy's attempts to reduce her vote by promising tougher immigration laws she has made good progress, unfortunately not enough to get her in to the second round but certainly enough to frighten the other candidates and on this side of the Channel the BBC and other lefty media organisations.
It is a sign that the people of Europe are becoming aware of the betrayal of the political class and they resent it. It will also give the FN more influence in French politics.
Whoever eventually gets in they will have to take into consideration the French patriots who are finally getting their act together.
In other European countries Nationalist parties will take heart and hopefully capitalise on the resurgance of patriotism enough to halt and reverse the colonisation visited on our continent by the venal traitors at present in power.
But what about the second round, the one which actually chooses the President?
Should Le Pen supporters back the Leftist Hollande in order to get rid of the despicable liar Sarkozy, or should they back Sarkozy in order to halt some of the dafter ideas of Hollande?
Much as I disagree with many of the policies of Hollande his election could hasten the break up of the EU and whatever else that must be a good thing.
With Sarkozy they will get more of the same and national identity subsumed into the morass of the EU.
So I hope Le Pen's voters stay at home in the second round and let Hollande get in, a small price to pay for the demise of the EU.
BUT, where is our Le Pen?
The BNP had a chance of changing British politics for the better, but that has been squandered by the present leadership and the party is just ignored in spite of the general disillusionment with the "main" parties.
If Griffin was a true patriot he would have long ago put his personal ambitions aside in the nation's interests.
But is he a true patriot?
Is he even on our side or working for the State?
I don't know but with him a block to any nationalist revival our beliefs will get nowhere.
Perhaps, after the local elections and the inevitable hammering the BNP candidates will get he will stand down, but I doubt it and we of patriotic beliefs will see our country sink further into the abyss without being able to do anything about it.
We need a new charismatic leader AND FAST.
The potential for a nationalist revival is there as in France but without leadership we will get nowhere.
Sunday, 22 April 2012
Friday, 20 April 2012
Terrorists threaten to attack UK if Qatada is deported
Al-Shabaab, the Somali based group linked to the terror network, said there would be “disaster” for the British public if Qatada is sent back to Jordan.
Last week al Qaeda itself warned it would “open the gates of evil” if the Government continues with the deportation.
The warning came as it emerged Theresa May could learn next month whether the Home Office blundered over the appeal deadline for Qatada.
A panel of European judges is expected to sit in May to decide whether the cleric’s application was in time – and whether he has a case for an appeal, sources said.
Liberal Democrats said the deadline fiasco, which has allowed Qatada to further delay his deportation, had been an “Olympic-standard screw up”
Read the rest here - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9217206/Terrorists-threaten-to-attack-UK-if-Qatada-is-deported.html
Last week al Qaeda itself warned it would “open the gates of evil” if the Government continues with the deportation.
The warning came as it emerged Theresa May could learn next month whether the Home Office blundered over the appeal deadline for Qatada.
A panel of European judges is expected to sit in May to decide whether the cleric’s application was in time – and whether he has a case for an appeal, sources said.
Liberal Democrats said the deadline fiasco, which has allowed Qatada to further delay his deportation, had been an “Olympic-standard screw up”
Read the rest here - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9217206/Terrorists-threaten-to-attack-UK-if-Qatada-is-deported.html
-------------------------------
What other reason do we need to ban ISLAM in the UK and kick out every single immigrant who has arrived here from 1997 to present ?
We owe them NOTHING, all they are are parasitic scum of the worst kind.
We owe them NOTHING, all they are are parasitic scum of the worst kind.
Thursday, 19 April 2012
WHAT IS GOING ON?
Just watched the debate on Sky Television where the various nonentities of the major parties put forward their policies and programmes.
After the main debate the smaller candidates were interviewed and I got my first opportunity of hearing the BNP candidate for the London Mayor.
WHAT IS GOING ON?
This candidate for a nationalist party which has as its main credo the halting of immigration is a Latin American who states on television that he is for immigration, but only legal immigration.
Nationalists are or should be against ALL immigration.
Now Mr Cortiglia is probably a very decent man BUT HE IS NOT BRITISH, and can not therefore understand how native Brits feel.
I can not understand why he was chosen for the BNP's mayoral candidate.
Is there nobody else in London suitable to stand for that office? If so the party is in a very bad state.
Where have all the good eloquent people gone who would have made excellent candidates?, and why are they not still with the party?
Even with the small numbers of members remaining in London there must be at least one native Brit.
It is beginning to seem that there is a deliberate intent to reduce nationalism to irrelevence by destroying the BNP, and that the leadership is complicit in this.
Why else would they choose a man who is not an ethnic Brit? Why else alienate all nationalists and potential supporters by standing someone, not one of us, and who can not understand how we feel to represent us?
The BNP leadership are not trying to win. They are making us a laughing stock and are thus traitors to the cause.
Hopefully(and I never thought I would ever have said this) this candidate will suffer a humiliating defeat and it will be a rallying call for all patriots to come together in unison to save our country.
There is not much time left if we are not to be swallowed in a third world cess pit.
After the main debate the smaller candidates were interviewed and I got my first opportunity of hearing the BNP candidate for the London Mayor.
WHAT IS GOING ON?
This candidate for a nationalist party which has as its main credo the halting of immigration is a Latin American who states on television that he is for immigration, but only legal immigration.
Nationalists are or should be against ALL immigration.
Now Mr Cortiglia is probably a very decent man BUT HE IS NOT BRITISH, and can not therefore understand how native Brits feel.
I can not understand why he was chosen for the BNP's mayoral candidate.
Is there nobody else in London suitable to stand for that office? If so the party is in a very bad state.
Where have all the good eloquent people gone who would have made excellent candidates?, and why are they not still with the party?
Even with the small numbers of members remaining in London there must be at least one native Brit.
It is beginning to seem that there is a deliberate intent to reduce nationalism to irrelevence by destroying the BNP, and that the leadership is complicit in this.
Why else would they choose a man who is not an ethnic Brit? Why else alienate all nationalists and potential supporters by standing someone, not one of us, and who can not understand how we feel to represent us?
The BNP leadership are not trying to win. They are making us a laughing stock and are thus traitors to the cause.
Hopefully(and I never thought I would ever have said this) this candidate will suffer a humiliating defeat and it will be a rallying call for all patriots to come together in unison to save our country.
There is not much time left if we are not to be swallowed in a third world cess pit.
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
DON'T VOTE GREEN
It is interesting to look at the candidates for the forthcoming local elections in Wigan.
It seems a party new to our area "The Greens" has raised its ugly head.
Yes I know that "Green" sounds nice and cuddly, save the world and all that, but I believe most people in this country are instinctively green.
I certainly am, having been a recycler for 50 years and always been concerned with the environment, so much so that I limited my family to two as my contribution to protecting the planet.
Because I am green by nature I supported the BNP and still believe in their principles and I would certainly put my cross against the BNP candidates name.
This year in the Orrell ward my place as a BNP candidate has been taken by a candidate for the Greens.
In addition there is a Green candidate for Winstanley.
But the corruption of the green label has been taken to extreme by the communist Stephen Hall standing as "Green Socialists for Investment not Cuts".
Well you have to give it to him, he has an original name for his communist agenda and he demeans the Green label even more than those who officially call themselves by that name.
Greens as dubbed by James Delingpole of the Telegraph are watermelons, green on the outside and red on the inside, and I think this is a fair description.
I do not know what policies the greens are promoting locally but I bet they keep under wraps their belief that fuel prices should rise and immigration should continue unabated.
They do not advocate limiting family size but they do advocate useless windmills and carbon taxes which will destroy what is left of our manufacturing industries and the jobs associated with this destruction.
Their policies are an even bigger threat even than those of the incompetent banker friendly Tories or the profigigate Labour Party.
I can not understand anyone with an ounce of sense or scientific knowledge voting for them.
And then we have the ludicrously named group, party? represented by Mr Hall.
You would have to laugh if it was not so serious.
Who would invest in his mad cap system? He must realise how stupid his ideas are, but then I believe he has an agenda to destroy our nature and culture, he certainly does not believe in free speech as evidenced by his organising of the thuggish attacks on the BNP in Leigh.
His friend the uncouth Peter Franzen could well get in this time owing to people's disillusionment with the other parties, but then their contempt for his blatant self promotion may induce them to stay at home. I hope so.
I can well understand anyone not wanting to vote for any of the at present main parties. They have betrayed their voters and our country. I believe many will not vote at all but at least we have a few candidates keeping the cause of British Nationalism burning.
If possible these people should be supported as well as those nationalist Independents such as Gary Chadwick in Leigh.
These people, not for selfish gain have put their heads above the parapet and risked abuse from the thugs of the far Left in an attempt to take our country back.
For all the faults of the BNP organisation and its leadership, the policies are the only ones which have a chance of representing our people and saving us from oblivion.
But people should realise that the Greens if they could would reduce our standard of living to that of the Middle Ages and thus a vote for any candidate other than a Green would be better than helping this destructive party into power.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)