RACIST? OF COURSE I AM. THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT.

When I was at school in the "forties" I learnt that in our country we had free speech unlike many others.
In the Communist bloc people had to pretend to be communist and join the party if they wanted a job. Disent or a contrary opinion could mean a spell in the gulags.
Similarly in Nazi Germany you had to be a party member and obey orders to avoid a concentration camp.
Even in the West in "The Land of the Free" any hint of a Communist opinion would land you in trouble.

Eventually the yoke of dictatorship was thrown off in the Soviet bloc and the books thrown open to demonstrate the tyrrany of the system. Similarly with the defeat of the nazis its hidden horrors were shown.

At last we thought the majority of the western world was free and people could articulate their thoughts without penalty.

Alas no such luck. A new Orwellian totalitarian system has arisen where pepole are afraid to give vent to their thoughts and opinions.

What is it? The "Race Industry".

According to the rules instigated slowly and surreptitiously by this well funded industry to utter a "racist" word is one of the most hienous crimes of all.
If a child utters a word considered by this body as racist it can blight his prospects of employment for life. If an adult, the sack without compensation and possibly with loss of pension.

All this is said to be done in the interests of equality but again some are more equal than others.
Black and other ethnic organisations are tolerated and even subsidised and encouraged while societies to promote the interests of "whites" are deemed racist.
Black organisations can not be tarred with the racist brush (pun intended)

All this makes native Brits frightened of speaking freely. If a topic vaguely racist is aired they seem obliged to preface their remarks with "I'm not racist but"
You never hear a black man say this.

Muslim hate clerics can promote death and destruction to non believers with impunity.
When terrorist outrages are committed the police visit "community elders" to reassure them that all is well.

Similarly when blacks riot the police take a softly softly approach to avoid inflaming feelings. Blacks are promoted above their capabilities in a show of diversity as it seems black criminals do not like being arrested by white officers.
I would not know, never having been arrested, but being arrested in MY country by someone born abroad would stick in my craw.

Why am I going on like this?

Well last week a seven year old child was threatened with being tagged racist after asking a dark boy at school whether he came from Africa, an innocent question I would have thought and with no malice.
His mother refused to sign that her son was racist. She insisted he isn't and I am sure that is so. It is only later when he realises the damage multiculturalism and immigration has done to his prospects that it will dawn on him that there is a logic to this so called racism.

It is not that we feel we are better, it is just that this is our only country and we want it for us. We have never been asked if we wanted this brave new world(some democracy).

If I had been the mother I would have been tempted to say my child is not racist but I am. The danger with that strategy would be that Social Services would be called and the child put into care.
Nothing must interfere with the brainwashing of our children.
Much of the deterioration of educational standards is down to the policy of promoting teachers on the grounds of their PC credentials which usually means a poor teacher as well.

So how do we counter this insidious brainwashing of our children?

Well we can take heart. In the USSR and Nazi Germany when people could speak freely they expressed the thoughts they always had but which of necessity had to lie dormant.

Also the law of unintended consequences kicks in.

When white kids are discriminated against at school, overlooked for promotion on grounds of positive discrimination and see their neighbourhoods degenerating into squalid ghettoes they will hold their tongues but the feeling of injustice will remain and will erupt in the future.

What can we older folk do.
Well they can't touch me, I'm retired so I shall continue to speak my mind, not in an agressive way but a factual one. I shall keep pointing out to my descendants the disadvantages they suffer.

It is not so hard and I am heartened by the seething anger many young Brits feel about the situation but dare not express it.

I can and so I state without any shame that as a patriot--

I AM A RACIST.

That is something I DO have in common with blacks as they are the most racist of all.

DIVERSITY TAKES PRECEDENCE

In spite of our straightened financial circumstances and front line services being severely cut it seems some departments are immune from any cuts.
The "Diversity and Citizen Directorate" of the Metropolitan police and its 36 staff is safe.
This virtuous group, headed by the daughter of immigrants on it is said £80,000 per year will continue to promote the interests of ethnic minority employees and deals with gender, disability and sexual orientation and race.

Three years ago it urged staff to "celebrate" the contribution of Roma gipsies to London's culture and diversity.
The total cost of this worthy operation must have cost well in excess of three million. No actual police duties, criminals arrested of course.Nothing must be allowed to detract from the more important work of diversity.

If this were all and the only example of police waste it would be bad enough but the above PC charade only refers to the Met.

Lancashire police has a similar department with a staff of about five led this time not by a black person but by a representitive of another so called disadvantaged group,a homosexual to see that there is no homophobia in Lancashire in the police or anywhere else.
They are not on the beat of course but doing the important work of collating alleged homophobic or racist incidents from their cosy warm offices.

It is interesting that these groups are always headed by a person from a so called minority group who always have an agenda to promote their cause and seek advantages over the "normal" ethnic Brits. We are thus themselves disadvantaged twice, first by being forced to pay for what we have not requested and being discriminated against at our own expense.

This situation is no doubt replicated throughout all police "services"(not forces) and the sums devoted to this cause must be enormous.

So when you are attacked or burgled and the police are too busy to attend you can rest assured that the important work is continuing in the office and all homophobic and racist comments recorded.

But that is not all.

Local authorities, while cutting down front line staff in the street maintenance, social care and refuse collection on account of cost imperatives will still ring fence diversity departments in their costly little empires.

The total costs must run into hundreds of millions, costs which add to our rates and taxes, costs which cost jobs and do not deliver the services to which we are entitled.

I believe this army of tax sucking parasites should be sacked with no compensation or given jobs which benefit our communities.
It will not happen of course and our country will keep sinking under the heavy load of these unproductive leeches.

THE PC AGENDA IS TOO ENTRENCHED and will remain so until we do hit the buffers .

BUT HIT THE BUFFERS IT WILL, and we will get the services we pay for at a lesser cost.

THIS MADNESS CAN NOT CONTINUE and logic and fairness WILL eventually prevail.

WE SHOULD KEEP OUR NOSES OUT

Why is our government making such a song and dance about the turmoil in Syria?
Have they not done enough damage in Libya and Egypt where the new "free" governments are implicated in torture and persecution against minorities.
What will happen in the future nobody knows but it is likely that muslim fundamentalists will gain control.

In Libya it was easy. Gadaffi was persuaded to give up his arms and so was unable to defend his regime.

This fact will not have been un noticed by Assad in Syria, a well armed state and there is no way we could intervene in what is a civil war.

I have no love for these Arab dictators but recent events have shown that replacing these strong men causes more suffering than if they had been left in place. In any case people do not like outsiders interfering in the internal p0olitics of a nation.

That is why Russia and China vetoed the UN resolutions lest it was taken as a method of poking our arrogant Western noses in the affairs of these countries.
And why is there no clamour for regime change in North Korea where there is much more persecution?
Because they are a nuclear power and that is the reason why Iran wants to join the nuclear club, so that they can not be intimidated by the USA, Israel, and its poodle supporters.
And who can blame them?

Bad as these regimes are they will in all likelyhood be replaced by even worse regimes but in any case these are matters internal to the countries concerned and nothing to do with us.

I have a feeling however that turmoil in the Middle East and the consequent disunity among the Arabs could have been engineered to prevent a united front against Israel when it proceeds with its promised attack on Iran.

I don't like the Iranian regime , but they are no threat to us and we could buy oil from them as does China but we wage economic war against them and our oil prices are going up as a consequence.
Yes they are belligerent towards Israel, but from England's point of view who cares? it is not our problem. I don't care if they blow each other off the face of the earth so long as our country is not involved.

Iran and Syria are no threat to us if we keep our noses out but we are paying the penalty in terrorism and oil prices because of our perceived support for Israel.

In the meantime China has access to cheap oil and is undercutting us financially.

It is time we realised who our friends are. We have none and must stand on our own feet and make our own way in the world by trade alone.
If it suits our interests go for it, if not ignore it and don't take sides.

Our governernment must realise that they were elected to promote our interests in a highly competitive world and that should be the first and only priority.

So KEEP YOUR NOSES OUT OF FOREIGN DISPUTES.

YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE.

A TOLERANT MUSLIM? DON'T BELIEVE IT.

As a lapsed Cof E member and now an agnostic I take issue with the militancy with which Prof Dawkins attacks religion as well as the secular fundamentalists who have succeeded in getting prayers banned at council meetings.

I do not see why it should bother them what other people believe or do.
I believe religious tenets are more suitable to primitive societies as explanations of events which were not then understood and to give simple people's lives a sense of meaning.

I wish I could believe in the last part but to me wishing something was true and life had a higher purpose does not make it true.
I believe we are too small and insignificant to understand the vast universe and thus remain agnostic, but if others have faith and it helps them then OK.

Having been brought up to it I do find a sense of peace and connection with our past in a Christian church. Christianity is part of our heritage and whether logical or not should be respected as should those who believe in it.

Islam though has and never had a place in our national conciousness nor should it in future.

Baroness Warsi's defence of Christianity is I believe a Trojan Horse, the thin end of the wedge.
Her ultimate goal as a muslim is the supremacy of that religion and its inevitable replacement of Christianity. Her advocacy of Christianity is a ploy to lull us to sleep and facilitate her foreign creed.

Both Christianity and islam are in my opinion based on superstition, but there the similarity ends.

Our country and traditions have been built on Christian principles of tolerance and love while islam advocates Holy wars.

Think about it.

Under which religion would you rather live Christianity or islam?
Under which religion would other faiths and beliefs be tolerated? It sure as Hell is not islam

So I do not see the hand of tolerance from the overpromoted "Baroness" I see a not so subtle attempt to further advance the triumph of her militant barbaric creed.

BEWARE OF MUSLIMS PREACHING TOLERANCE.

A TOLERANT MUSLIM IS AN OXYMORON AND ISLAM IS AN ALIEN FAITH IN OUR LAND.

CHRISTIANITY, FOR ALL ITS FAULTS BELONGS HERE.

THIN BLACK SKINS

As I have said previously I have no interest in football but the furore over Suarez's refusal to shake Evra's hand has appalled me.

Suarez was alleged to have said some "racist" word to the thin skinned black Evra and was fined £40,000 and eight games for it.
No mention of what may have been said by Evra to Suarez. Race was the issue and must be punished. No matter that Suarez may himself have a bit of black in his genetics Evra cried like a soft child to the authorities and had Suarez punished.

I have never played the soft game of Soccer but have played a bit of Rugby Union in my time and on the field insults and even blows were exchanged.
We did not complain to the ref about verbal insults and shook hands after the game.
I have not heard of incidents like this in Rugby and there are many black players in that game.
They are obviously not so touchy.

It was suggested a few weeks ago that this should be the case in so called racial insults after the game, but this was considered unacceptable by the authorities.
Comments in the heat of the moment do not matter and a handshake after the match puts the matter to an end, and any racial comments put behind with a pint together.

In this case Evra, like a spoilt child had a severe penalty imposed on Suarez who in any case he was not being racist, but just using a Spanish word. He was not convicted of anything but nevertheless lost money and games because Evra would not let the case drop.

And Evra expected Suarez to shake his hand?
He must have been deluded.

It's like me being asked to shake hands with someone who has cost me thousands.
NO WAY.

Now the PC FA have prevailed on Dalgleish and Suarez to apologise.
Money and power talks but you know that their thoughts will remain the same.

If people like Evra with thin black skins (an anatomical oxymoron) can not stand the rough and tumble of insults in the so called English game then perhaps they should return to their African homeland where they could display their undoubted skills but receive less of the white man's money.

P S did you see Owen Farrell of Wigan win the match for England in the man's game, Rugby against Italy?
His kicking was superb. It made one proud to be a Wiganer.

As I said yesterday when he kicked the goals--
GOD BLESS FARRELL,WIGAN AND St GEORGE. and I was not referring to you Tony.

Moslem Comedienne Shazia Mirza says - White People are Scum

Moslem Comedienne Shazia Mirza says - White People are Scum

REPORT THIS RACIST BITCH FOR RACISM...

"I JUST THOUGHT WHITE PEOPLE WERE SCUM"

A BLACK DAY FOR JUSTICE

First of all let me state that I have not the slightest interest in football(Soccer that is) but feel forced to comment on the Terry, Capello saga.

When Israel is threatening Iran and a Syrian civil war in progress, and our country's parlous national finances the media are awash with this trivial episode.

Why?

Terry is alleged to have said something which mentioned a black player's colour, something he has obviously a complex about even though the colour of his skin as allegedly stated by Terry is true.
Terry could have used far more crude and insulting words with impunity and thus got away with it.
He could have used physical violence and only lost a few games as punishment.

Yes these blacks certainly a hang up about their colour/race, possibly a feeling of inferiority. After all they have a lot to feel inferior about for apart from an ability in sport and rhythm music those of African origin have acheived little.

However that is or should be their problem, but we have become so brainwashed that Terry has been sacked before the trial, which again should not be needed in a country where free speech was once cherished.

But it got worse. Capello was forced to resign because of statements criticising the witch hunt aganst Terry. A foreigner standing up for British justice, that must be a first.

I can understand that in a team it is important for players to work together to achieve success but there are many cases of players on ths same team who have fallen out when on opposing teams working well together even after physical confrontations (well there are in Rugby).

This morning it was said that we should have an English manager for our national side. Black people are evidently English if born here it seems.
So it is alright to discriminate against white Europeans but not touchy blacks.

Now I don't really object to black sportsmen being on our national teams but I DO object to this touchyness about skin pigmentation when they are "insulted"
If they wish to be considered "English" perhaps they should act English and they could more easily blend into our society (if you close your eyes)

"Sticks and stones etc".

But of course that will never happen. Our country has been so brainwashed and infected with this NWO crap that those in authority will prevent it.

This case is exemplified the mindset of those in the BBC who ban the use of the word "extremist" against muslim terrorists who wish to take over our society and have advocated killing of non believers while the words "extreme right" is routinely used against those patriots who wish to preserve our way of life by electoral means.

1984 is already here although not noticed by many people.
Can we rid ourselves of this pernicious doctrine by peaceful means?

I don't know. It will be hard but prevail in the long term we will, hopefully by fair means, but in the end--

WE MUST

WHATEVER IT TAKES