A LOCAL BLOG SUPPORTING THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE AND ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN AND LEIGH IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST FASCISM, THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT AND FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT. - "NO FOREIGN PRINCE, PERSON, PRELATE, STATE OR POTENTATE HATH, OR OUGHT TO HAVE, ANY JURISDICTION, POWER, SUPERIORITY, PRE-EMINENCE, OR AUTHORITY, ECCLESIASTICAL OR SPIRITUAL, WITHIN THIS REALM" (ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689)

Friday, 23 July 2010
A USEFUL MEETING
Basically it was a debate and most had points to put and ideas on how to improve and build on our progress.
The encouraging aspect of the debate was that in the end agreement was reached on most matters and we will be acting on these proposals in the near future.
I will not go into the details here as it was an invitation only private event apart form saying we all left feeling positive about the future of the Party in this area and we will soon be seeing the results.
I think it is a good thing to have these extra gatherings to compare notes from different groups and branches. Often at the usual meetings there is not time to discuss all matters in detail and the success of last night will encourage us to have more such gatherings.
Thursday, 22 July 2010
UNITE THE UNION BETRAYED THE BRITISH WORKERS
it has been reported that
"PAC aims to forge a “non-partisan” alliance of Wigan trade unionists and public service users across the Metro against the huge public spending cuts across the borough over the next two years and beyond."[...]
"PAC prides itself on being a ‘broad church’ with activists including leading figures in Metro town hall unions Unison and UNITE, plus civil service union Public and Commercial Services (PCS), along with community activists from across the borough,
A spokesman from Leigh Unite union, branch president Stephen Hall, said the rally was the first street event."
Now listen to Jack Dromy the leader of UNITE, the Labour party treasurer and married to the hateful woman HARRIET HARMan has to say on British Jobs For British Workers (A BNP slogan which New labour stole)
Do you really believe what UNITE and the rest of the unions say ?
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
THE UNITED NATIONS
And from where do we get this? Ah! From Inga-Britt Ahlenius, a Swedish auditor who until last week served as the UN undersecretary general of the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), which is meant to keep the fight against internal fraud and corruption alive.
Of Sec-Gen Ban Ki-moon, she says: "Your actions are not only deplorable, but seriously reprehensible ... Your action is without precedent and in my opinion seriously embarrassing for yourself," in an introduction to a 50-page memo, which was first obtained by The Washington Post.
"I regret to say that the secretariat now is in a process of decay," she goes on. "Rather than supporting the internal oversight, which is the sign of strong leadership and good governance, you have strived to control it which is to undermine its position." The UN Secretariat, she says, is "drifting into irrelevance".
Tragically, this comes as absolutely no surprise to anyone who has been following the UN and knows even a little of its ways. It is a corrupt, ineffective and thoroughly unaccountable organisation. Anyone who thinks we could or should do business with it is either barking mad, stupid or corrupt, ineffective and thoroughly unaccountable. Take your pick.
[ Could always be - and in my view is - 'ALL of the above' ]
Is there anyone out there who thinks the EU, and its leading lights, is any different?
Scource
Morg
.
Tuesday, 20 July 2010
HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE BURKA
The fact that this rights act should be maligned does not detract from the principle and justice of the concept of human rights. It is the way the concept is enacted and enforced which is the problem.
Let's break the concept down.
All people have the right to freedom of expression and movement in public places in their own country. We have the right to a decent environment fresh air and water.
All children have the right to protection, and sustenance as well as the opportunity for a decent education and equal chance to make their way as participants in society, and of course from arbitrary persecution and arrest by the State. In other words freedom.
Old people have the right, after their working days are over to a decent standard of living as have the disabled.
All these rights society has a duty to ensure and these rights should be cherished.
Now we come to other essential needs which are predicated on duty.
Food and shelter are essential for life, but the right to these involves the duty to work to provide them for people themselves and those who are not in a position to do so, either from disability, age or lack of opportunity.
The way in which the present Human Rights legislation is implemented does not guarantee those rights for the average citizen.
Criminals and terrorists often have greater rights than the law abiding. Our rights are infringed by terror laws which started as a reaction to islamic attacks and our right to walk freely in our towns curtaied by muslim groups who claim ownership to enclaves in our towns.
We are forbidden to complain about this take over of our country under draconian race laws which make making such complaints illegal as "discriminating" against these unasked for and unwanted invaders.
We are FORCED to pay taxes to support and house them while our people languish on waiting lists.
We are forced to see our towns become alien places their British character and feel swamped by this invasion from all over the world.
We are faced to pay taxes to subsidise these people who do not like us just to appease them in the hope that by doing so no more outrages are perpetrated.
We are forced to be disturbed by women walking down our streets dressed as black crows and the men in their ugly medieval garb and bearded faces.
WHAT ABOUT OUR RIGHTS?
Even Syria, a muslim country has banned the wearing of the burka as has Turkey.
Yes these people have also rights, but rights depend on not infringing on the rights of others.
And there are special rights belonging to us, the right to call this our country.
We have the right to complain at this turning of our country into a foreign land, as muslims have the right to object to our presence in their land.
They have the right to wear their funny clothes,
BUT NOT IN OUR COUNTRY.
If they want to dress in this garb, they have the right to go to to a country where it is the norm, BUT IT IS NOT THE NORM HERE.
Sunday, 18 July 2010
AYO GORKHALI
WIGAN PATRIOT SUPPORTS THE GURKHAS -
Gurkha ordered back to UK after beheading dead Taliban fighter :
"A Gurkha soldier has been flown back to the UK after hacking the head off a dead Taliban commander with his ceremonial knife to prove the dead man’s identity.
The private, from 1st Battalion, Royal Gurkha Rifles, was involved in a fierce firefight with insurgents in the Babaji area of central Helmand Province when the incident took place earlier this month.
His unit had been told that they were seeking a ‘high value target,’ a Taliban commander, and that they must prove they had killed the right man.The Gurkhas had intended to remove the Taliban leader’s body from the battlefield for identification purposes.
But they came under heavy fire as their tried to do so. Military sources said that in the heat of battle, the Gurkha took out his curved kukri knife and beheaded the dead insurgent.
He is understood to have removed the man’s head from the area, leaving the rest of his body on the battlefield.
This is considered a gross insult to the Muslims of Afghanistan, who bury the entire body of their dead even if parts have to be retrieved.
British soldiers often return missing body parts once a battle has ended so the dead can be buried in one piece.
A source said: ‘Removing the head in this way was totally inappropriate.’
Army sources said that the soldier, who is in his early 20s, initially told investigators that he unsheathed his kukri – the symbolic weapon of the Gurkhas – after running out of ammunition.
But later the Taliban fighter was mutilated so his identity could be verified through DNA tests.
The source said: ‘The soldier has been removed from duty and flown home. There is no sense of glory involved here, more a sense of shame. He should not have done what he did.’
The incident, which is being investigated by senior commanders, is hugely embarrassing to the British Army, which is trying to build bridges with local Afghan communities who have spent decades under Taliban rule.
It comes just days after a rogue Afghan soldier murdered three British troops from the same Gurkha regiment.
If the Gurkha being investigated by the Army is found guilty of beheading the dead enemy soldier, he will have contravened the Geneva Conventions which dictate the rules of war. Soldiers are banned from demeaning their enemies.
The Gurkha now faces disciplinary action and a possible court martial. If found guilty, he could be jailed.
He is now confined to barracks at the Shorncliffe garrison, near Folkestone, Kent.
The incident happened as the Gurkha troop was advancing towards a hostile area before engaging the enemy in battle.
Colonel Richard Kemp, a former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, said: ‘In this case, it appears that the soldier was not acting maliciously, but his actions were clearly ill-judged.
‘The Gurkhas are a very fine regiment with a proud tradition of service in the British forces and have fought very bravely in Afghanistan.
'I have no doubt that this behaviour would be as strongly condemned by the other members of that regiment, as it would by all soldiers in the British forces.’
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: ‘We are aware of an incident and have informed the Afghan authorities. An inves-tigation is underway and it would not be appropriate to comment further until this is concluded.’
The Ministry also revealed yesterday that four British servicemen had been killed in Afghanistan in 24 hours.
An airman from the RAF Regiment died in a road accident near Camp Bastion in Helmand and a marine from 40 Commando Royal Marines was killed in an explosion in Sangin on Friday.
A Royal Dragoon Guard died in a blast in the Nahr-e Saraj district of Helmand Province yesterday. The fourth serviceman also died in an explosion.
The British death toll in the Afghan campaign since 2001 is now 322.
Afghan troops trained by the British Army recently led a major operation into a Taliban stronghold.
It was one of the first operations organised by the Afghan National Army.
Regiment’s proud symbol of valour
The iconic kukri knife used by the Gurkhas can be a weapon or a tool. It is the traditional utility knife of the Nepalese people, but is mainly known as a symbolic weapon for Gurkha regiments all over the world.
The kukri signifies courage and valour on the battlefield and is sometimes worn by bridegrooms during their wedding ceremony.
The kukri’s heavy blade enables the user to inflict deep wounds and to cut muscle and bone with one stroke.
It can also be used in stealth operations to slash an enemy’s throat, killing him instantly and silently.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1295617/Gurkha-ordered-UK-beheading-dead-Taliban-fighter.html------------------
What chance do we have when we are told to fight a PC war against a Battle Hardened ISLAMIST TALIBAN?
GIVE THIS MAN MEDAL AND GET BEHIND HIM - SHOW HIM YOUR SUPPORT IN WHATEVER WAY YOU CAN.
MICKEY MOUSE TEACHING
