THE ROADSHOW COMES TO WIGAN/LEIGH

The well received National Roadshow is coming to our area.
Until now it has been a "black tie " do but from next week the event becomes a more informal occasion but equally spectacular.

The theme is our fight over the centuries to preserve our nation from foreign invaders and our determination not to allow the sacrifices of our forefathers in toil and death to be thrown away.
We are fortunate to have been chosen to hold this event and we aim to take full advantage of it.
The event will be a showcase for our party and seek to dispel the falsehoods spread in the media about our policies, people and motives.
It will be held at a well known local venue with secure parking, next Friday 13th March at 7.30 pm

Yes we hope to augment our funds but that is not the only or even the primary purpose.

Our purpose is to bond together, united against all the destroyers of our country, and to enjoy and savour the true British spirit. We want to make a bit of money but we want to have a good time, in the spirit of "The Last Night of The Proms".
For the £5 admission fee there will be a buffet and all the entertainment.
SO COME AND HAVE SOME FUN AND HELP US CLEAR OUT THE THIEVES OF GOVERNMENT AND THE OTHER PARTIES.

Tickets available from local organisers and members or by ringing 01744 892430, or e mail sandyforth@aol.com

UPCOMING EU ELECTIONS: BNP v UKIP

We in the BNP already know from our local election results nationwide that UKIP is collapsing. Their vote anywhere they stand a candidate is derisory. They have recently lost one of their leading figures, Robin Page.

The mainstream media doesn’t seem to be discussing properly the implications of the collapse of UKIP – they don’t like the thoughts it brings into their heads, and they definitely don’t want ordinary voters to pick up on it. Once voters start getting the idea that “hey, the BNP could get winners out of this” then they are more likely to turn out and vote for us. However, there are highly respected people who are looking at these implications.

”The Tories have been quick to pick up Pages' resignation statement and, no doubt, some are hoping that they will be the beneficiaries of the collapse of UKIP – and that it is. (There is a piece this morning on Tory Diary, which has some interesting, if predictable, comments.)

It is unlikely, however, that the Tories gain any benefit whatsoever. As we pointed out earlier, the inheritors of the UKIP vote – and many more – will almost certainly be the BNP. That seems to be what Labour's private polling is telling it.

We are thus looking a situation where the BNP will for the first time gain a number of MEPs. On the other hand, there is a very real prospect of a total wipe-out for UKIP. It could well lose all its MEPs, including its original three gained in 1999. That, if it happens – and it looks increasingly certain – will effectively mean the end of UKIP and the end of euroscepticism organised on a party basis. For that too, we will have to thank Farage.

But, as we also indicated earlier, that does not mean that euroscepticism will disappear. On the contrary, it will acquire a harder edge, carried along by parallel agendas which the establishment will not like. In the past, they have had great sport from UKIP, mocking and denigrating its members. Now the hard men are going to take over. They will not be mocked so easily – or at all.”

Go read it all:

http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2009/03/page-turns.html

Do read that article, and do take particular note of the second half of it regarding the “expected” riots this coming summer. Again, very interesting.

The army on the streets? Always possible I suppose given that it isn’t the usual Leftard suspects that are expected to be rioting – it is the ordinary working (or increasingly not working) lower and middle-classes that are expected to take to the streets. This is quite disturbing news given that they wont deploy the army against Muslim rioters – ♪♫ run rabbit run rabbit run run run ♪♪♪ police will do quite nicely for them (we’ve all seen “that film”).

Now, it’s hardly credible that even our current lot of dismal political leaders would expect a soldier in a London-based regiment would open fire on fellow Londoners (recent-years recruited police might be a different matter – “I’m only doing my job ma’am“ CRACK!), or that one from a Yorkshire based regiment (most regiments recruit the majority of their soldiers from particular geographical areas – not all, but a majority) would open up on the people of Leeds. However, it is conceivable that a Yorkshire soldier would do a Londoner and vice-versa.

So, a sign to watch out for between now and this coming Summer … watch out for Northern regiments being moved South, Southern regiments moved North to take over each others’ barracks. Watch for Welsh and Scottish soldiers moving to England while English soldiers move to Scotland and Wales.

They made these sorts of moves with the police during the miners’ strike. Brought in outsiders to do the dirty stuff.

If anyone picks up any news of military (or police) movements resembling these scenarios, please email what you know. I can be contacted via my ‘Contributor’ button at the bottom of this page.

UPDATE

"In a stunning conversation with a friend, who is a serving member of the Armed Forces, over the weekend, it was revealed that transfers to regiments and other units in the UK on home duties are being undertaken by the MOD based upon whether an individual was prepared to 'open fire' on UK citizens during civil disturbances.

I found this long and extracted conversation to be both bizarre and frightening. I will state at this point that he is someone that I have known for years, and trust implicitly. The fact that service personnel are actually being asked in special briefing sessions whether they would fire on their own nationals indicates that the rumours about the Army being put on standby are indeed very true."

http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2009/3/2/4109792.html

READ IT ALL.

I happen to know independently that the immediately-above blogger is a former serviceman. Like me, he enlisted at the age of 15.

Morg
.

BETRAYED ONCE AGAIN BY OUR MPs

So here we have it in glorious red, our local Labour MPs champions of the workers and Britain, all voting with the government to sell 30% of the Royal Mail to a foreign company.

So much for their concerns for the British workers, community or economy.

Our self styled "Socialist" MP for Makerfield has sold his soul for pieces of silver,not for the first time (remember his £111,000 per year for his part time job helping to decommission the Sellafield nuclear plant) well he did fry a few eggs before he landed his overpaid MPs job.

Not much could be expected of Neil Turner, Wigan's invisible MP. He just follows his masters like a lap dog.

Pretty boy Andy Burnham is young enough not to rock the boat while stabbing his constituents in the back. He is young enough to expect a job in the future shadow cabinet so he must not blot his copy book must he?

The arguments for part privatisation of Royal Mail are spurious. Yes more efficiencies have to be made and there is competition from e mail, but why can these improvements not be done within Royal Mail?. Presumably any firm buying a share would expect to make a profit so why can it not be done within the present company and we, the people have any future profit?

Post Office staff not productive enough, OK sack the bosses, they are supposed to be running the business, and get better ones.
Not enough money? There is an unlimited amount to bail out the banks, why not the Post Office.

We as a country have lived for too long by selling off "the family silver" and look where it has got us. The only ones to profit have been the thieves of the city of London and now Mandelson's mates want to do it again while the rest of us suffer.

An remember in Germany the Deutsch Post is very profitable but it costs 96 pence to post a letter.
Our MPs, Socialists? My a**e.

GEERT WILDERS' SPEECH IN THE U.S. CONGRESS

Geert Wilders, member of (the Dutch) parliament , and leader of, the PVV (Party for Freedom), was detained at Heathrow and refused entry to Britain after flying here to address a meeting in Parliament, with a showing of his film Fitna.

He has not been refused entry to any other country, and has been invited to such meetings in several. Recently, he attended an exact equivalent meeting and film show in the U.S. Congress. Here is the text of the speech he made – undoubtedly pretty much the same speech he would have made here, except here he would probably have made references to Churchill rather than Reagan. He was, after all, speaking to an American audience.

So: is this a free country? Do we have free speech (we have the experience of our Chairman to judge by too)? Surely freedom of speech IS the freedom to give offence.

The speech:

Thank you.

Thank you very much for inviting me. And - to the immigration authorities - thank you for letting me into this great country. It is always a pleasure to cross a border without being sent back on the first plane.

I feel very honoured to have the privilege to speak and to show my short documentary Fitna here in this heart of your democracy, here in the US Senate.

Today, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack all throughout Europe. Free speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural element of our existence, our birth right, is now something we once again have to battle for.

As you might know, I will be prosecuted in my own country, because of my film Fitna, my remarks regarding Islam, and my view concerning what some call a “religion of peace”.
A few years from now, I might be a criminal. And on top of that The Kingdom of Jordan also threatens to prosecute me for insulting Islam and ask for my extradition.

Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue; I gave up my freedom four and a half years ago. I am under full-time police protection ever since because of death threats from muslims and terrorist groups linked to Al Qaida. In the last few years I lived in different safehouses, army-baracks and yes: even prison cells in order to be safe.But it’s not about me. The real question is: will free speech be put behind bars?

And the larger question for the West is: will we leave Europe’s children the values of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem, or the values of Mecca, Teheran and Gaza?

This is what video blogger Pat Condell said in one of his latest you tube appearances. He says: “if I talked about Muslims the way their holy book talks about me, I’d be arrested for hate speech.”
Now Mr. Condell is a stand-up comedian, but in the video he is dead serious and the joke is on us. Hate speech will always be used against the people defending the West - in order to please and appease Muslims. They can say whatever they want: throw gays from apartment buildings, kill the Jews, slaughter the infidel, destroy Israel, jihad against the West. Whatever their book tells them.

Ladies and gentlemen, make no mistake, my prosecution is a full-fledged attack by the left on freedom of speech in order to please Muslims. In fact it was started by a member of the Dutch Labour party. If you read what the court of Amsterdam has written about me, you read the same texts that cultural relativists produce.

In fact, cultural relativism is the worst disease in Europe today. Most of our politicians believe that all cultures are equal. Well let me tell you they are not. Our Western culture based on Christianity, Judaism and humanism is in every aspect better than the Islamic culture. Like the brave apostate Wafa Sultan said: it’s a comparison between a culture of reason and a culture of barbarism.

Back to my country. How low can we go in the Netherlands? About my prosecution, The Wall Street Journal noted: “this is no small victory for Islamic regimes seeking to export their censorship laws to wherever Muslims reside”. The Journal concluded that by The Netherlands accepting the free speech standards of, say, Saudi-Arabia, I stand correct in my observation that - I quote- “Muslim immigration is eroding traditional Dutch liberties”.

Now, if the Wall Street Journal has the moral clarity to see that my prosecution is the logical outcome of our disastrous, self-hating, cultural relativists immigration policies, then why can’t the European liberal establishment see the same thing? Why aren’t they getting at least a little bit scared by the latest news out of, for example, the UK?The news tells [us] that the Muslim population in Britain is growing ten times as fast as the rest of society. Why don’t they care?
The answer is: they don’t care because they are blinded by their cultural relativism. Their disdain of the West is so much greater than the appreciation of our many liberties. And therefore, they are willing to sacrifice everything.

The left once stood for women’s rights, gay rights, equality, democracy. Now, they favour immigration policies that will end all this. Many have even lost their decency. Elite politicians in Europe have no problem to participate in or finance demonstrations where Muslims shout “Death to the Jews”.

Seventy years after Auschwitz they know of no shame.

Two weeks ago, I tried to get into Britain, a fellow EU country. I was invited to give a speech in Parliament. However, upon arrival at London airport, I was refused entry into the UK, detained for three hours and sent back on the first plane to The Netherlands. The reason: I would threaten community harmony and therefore public security. And all this because of my film “Fitna”.

An absolute disgrace. The British Home Secretary even publicly admitted on BBC TV that she never watched my film Fitna but decided to ban [it] from the UK anyway.

If I would have been admitted to the UK I would have loved to have reminded the audience of a great man who once spoke in the House of Commons. In 1982 President Reagan gave a speech there that very few people liked. Reagan called upon the West to reject communism and defend freedom. He introduced a phrase: “evil empire”. Reagan’s speech stands out as a clarion call to preserve our liberties. I quote: “If history teaches anything, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly”. What Reagan meant is that you cannot run away from history, you cannot escape the dangers of ideologies that are out to destroy you.

Denial is no option.

Ladies and gentlemen, I suggest to defend freedom in general and freedom of speech in particular. I propose the withdrawal of all hate speech legislation in Europe. I propose a European First Amendment. In Europe we should defend freedom of speech like you Americans do. In Europe freedom of speech should be extended, instead of restricted. Of course, calling for violence or unjustly yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre have to be punished, but the right to criticize ideologies or religions [is a] necessary condition for a vital democracy.

As George Orwell once said: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”.

Let us defend freedom of speech and let us gain strength and work hard to become even stronger. Millions think just like you and me. Millions think liberty is precious. That democracy is better than sharia. And after all, why should we be afraid? Our many freedoms and our prosperity are the result of centuries of endeavour. Centuries of hard work and sacrifice. We do not stand alone.

Ladies and gentlemen, our enemies should know: we will never apologize for being free men, we will never give in. We will never surrender. There is no stronger power than the force of free men fighting for the great cause of liberty. Because freedom is the birthright of all man.

Freedom must prevail, and freedom will prevail.

Thank you very much.

Geert Wilders
Chairman Party for Freedom (PVV)


Morg
.

A BROKEN SOCIETY

Surprise surprise,the teenage pregnancy rate has gone up in spite of efforts to reduce it. Social workers say more sex education is the asnwer.
BOLLOCKS.

When I was at school until the age of 18 there was no sex education and no contraceptive pill or abortion.
There was not one pupil who became pregnant. Why? Because it did not pay.

In those days our hormones were just as strong as they are now but the girls were told that they would be in BIG trouble if they became pregnant and we boys would have been responsible for any pregnancies.

This is how people behave. If something pays they will do it. That's why free enterprise pays. If fraud pays that's why it is perpetrated and why the banking system has bankrupted the country. It paid to be greedy.
Crime is on the increase because the penalties are too weak ie crime pays.

Immigrants come here instead of remaining in France because it pays.
Employers take on immigrants at the expense of local people because it pays.
Some things do not pay so we don't do them.
I don't drink and drive because to lose my licence does not pay. When there was no risk I did.
The other parties demonise us because their cosy cabal pays them and we are a threat.

The newspapers villify us and will not accept our adverts because of pressure from the authorities make it financially bad for them to do so. They say it is on ethical grounds but still accept adverts for prostitutes because these bring in revenue ie pay.

Tony Blair took us in his illegal wars to cosy up to America so that he could make money there in speeches.

People will always respond willingly to incentives.
Fascists such as this government believe coercion will work. It may do for a bit but human nature will always in the end prevail.
So the answer to all our woes is to incentivise people to do the right thing by the community.

Make single pregnancy a thing to be feared.
Give stiff and deterrant sentences to criminals (especially violent thugs and fraudulent people such as bankers).
Stop benefits for supposedly asylum seekers.
Heavy fines for employers who take them on.
etc etc I could go on and on.

The only way to rebuild this broken and increasingly alien society is to reward the hard workers who put so much in and keep themselves out of trouble and penalise heavily these antisocial people who are destroying us.
It's not hard and most would end up with a higher standard of living instead of being dragged down paying out for those who always take out of society.
THE ABOVE IS MY INTERPRETATION OF A SNIPPET OF BNP POLICY.
AM I RIGHT?

GOOD ADVICE

These are extracts from a speech given by Sean Gabb, Director of the Libertarian Alliance (not the same as the Libertarian Party) to ‘Conservative Future’. He is no nationalist, and indeed, does not like us very much at all. However, as a genuine Libertarian he defends us. And just because he’s not a nationalist doesn’t mean there isn’t anything we can learn from him. He says a great deal that is just plain good common sense - mixed in with the things he says that we don’t like. It’s not all or nothing – you can cherry-pick the bits you like and think are useful to us. You will see that even the Marxists know and say things we can learn from.

He posts new articles once or twice every month and I read them all. Even when I disagree with him I can see where he’s bringing his arguments from; and he does make you think, which is never a bad thing. We don’t know it all, and we shouldn’t refuse to read stuff just because it’s not a nationalist saying it.

This is his website, and I recommend that everyone reads what he says

http://www.seangabb.co.uk/flcomm/

This text is extracted from Commentary 181 (look down the sidebar on the left-hand side of the page). Look through the sidebar, click on any of the articles that catch your attention. There are 181 to choose from. Much of the advice he gives is good for nationalists too.

http://www.seangabb.co.uk/flcomm/flc181.htm

My first piece of advice is to understand the nature of your enemy. If you come into government, you will be in at least the same position as Ramsay MacDonald, when he formed the first Labour Government in the 1920s. He faced an Establishment that was broadly conservative. The administration, the media, the universities, big business - all were hostile to what it was believed he wanted to do. The first Labour Governments were in office, but not fully in power, as they were not accepted by the people with whom and through whom they had to rule the country. To a lesser degree, Clement Attlee and Harold Wilson faced the same constraints. …

Over the past few generations, a new Establishment or ruling class has emerged in this country. It is a loose coalition of politicians, bureaucrats, educators, media people and associated business interests. These are people who derive income and status from an enlarged and activist state. They have been turning this country into a soft-totalitarian police state. They are not always friendly to a Labour Government. But their natural political home is the Labour Party. …

The Thatcher Government set out to fight and defeat an earlier and less confident version of the Establishment - but only on those fronts where its policies were most resisted. It won numerous battles, but, we can now see, it lost the war. For example, I well remember the battle over abolition of the Greater London Council. This appeared at the time a success. But I am not aware of one bureaucrat who lost his job at the GLC who was not at once re-employed by one of the London Boroughs or by some other agency of the State. And we know that Ken Livingstone was eventually restored to power in London.

If you want to win the battle for this country, you need to take advice from the Marxists. These are people whose ends were evil where not impossible. But they were experts in the means to their ends. They knew more than we have ever thought about the seizure and retention of power. I therefore say this to you. If you ever do come to power, and if you want to bring about the irreversible transfer of power to ordinary people, you should take to heart what Marx said in 1871, after the failure of the Paris Commune: “the next attempt of the French Revolution will be no longer, as before, to transfer the bureaucratic-military machine from one hand to another, but to smash it, and this is the precondition for every real people’s revolution”.

The meaning of this is that you should not try to work with the Establishment. You should not try to jolly it along. You should not try fighting it on narrow fronts. You must regard it as the enemy, and you must smash it.

On the first day of your government, you should close down the BBC. You should take it off air. You should disclaim its copyrights. You should throw all its staff into the street. You should not try to privatise the BBC. This would simply be to transfer the voice of your enemy from the public to the private sector, where it might be more effective in its opposition. You must shut it down - and shut it down at once. You should do the same with much of the administration. The Foreign Office, much of the Home Office, the Commission for Racial Equality, anything to do with health and safety and planning and child protection - I mean much of the public sector - these should be shut down. If at the end of your first month in power, you have not shut down half of the State, you are failing. If you have shut down half the State, you have made a step in the right direction, and are ready for still further cuts.

Let me emphasise that the purpose of these cuts would not be to save money for the taxpayers or lift an immense weight of bureaucracy from their backs - though they would do this. The purpose is to destroy the Establishment before it can destroy you. You must tear up the web of power and personal connections that make these people effective as an opposition to radical change. If you do this, you will face no more clamour than if you moved slowly and half-heartedly. Again, I remember [the] campaign against the Thatcher "cuts". There were no cuts, except in the rate of growth of state spending. You would never have thought this from the the torrent of protests that rolled in from the Establishment and its clients. And so my advice is to go ahead and make real cuts - and be prepared to set the police on anyone who dares riot against you.

[ … ]

Following from this, however, I advise you to leave large areas of the welfare state alone. It is regrettable, but most people in this country do like the idea of healthcare free at the point of use, and of free education, and of pensions and unemployment benefit. …

Go read it all. Particularly note how it’s brought to an end – something we in the BNP are all too familiar with. Seems you don’t have to be BNP to be a “Fascist” – you just have to have views at variance with the Leftard Nufascists. They try to shut you up whenever they realize that you know how to beat them, and want you to stop telling everyone else. What do you think the “No platform” policy is all about?

That is something we DO know all about, isn’t it.

And here are a couple of bits that he left out – when you shut these departments down, you must immediately get on with shredding and incinerating all their databases, contacts and personnel files – everything, the lot. Otherwise they will just have a foundation to carry on where they left off if ever they again get themselves in a position to access all that information. Just a thought. Shred it – incinerate it.

And the ABSOLUTE FIRST two things the incoming BNP government must do before even all that: Secede from the EU and all previously signed treaties. No negotiations, no discussions – just push a one-paragraph bill through Parliament. Will only take a few hours. And order our armed forces returned home immediately from wherever in the world they are (with their equipment). We just may need them to defend our borders from a now-hostile EU, and we will certainly need our navy to defend the integrity of our territorial waters from foreign fish-looters backed by foreign navies.

Then get on with the above.


Sean Gabb – recommended reading. Even for nationalists.

Morg
.

MORE WIGAN "ENRICHMENT"

I see from the Evening Post that there are now 500 asylum seekers in Wigan speaking 50 languages, many from countries where there is no risk of perseqution.

The independant Wigan Refugee and Migrant Forum (WARM) (who pays for them?) states that there is a lack of cultural awareness in the local population and evidence of "far right" (that's us folks) in the area.
Why should we have cultural awareness? Why should we welcome these uninvited guests?

Who decided that they should come here? We certainly did not.
They say they want the poor housing conditions of these immigrants to be addressed. What about Wiganers who can not get a house?

They want "hate crimes" to be reported however trivial. More work for Elliot then.
They say we need them as our population is ageing. Do they not have children or will they not?
They say the immigrants will go back home after working here. Pull the other one, most of them do not work now

We don't need them nor want them. We have plenty of unemployed people to look after our old people and to pay them well if they got rid of the parasitic bureaucracy in Wigan Metro (that's people like you Elliot).

We have no wish to be enriched nor vibrant. We want our true Wigan spirit of honest hard working Lancastrians. We have not voted for this invasion.
I note there was no comments section after this article. I wonder why?

Far right in this area? "You aint seen nothing yet"