Sunday, 14 March 2010

Representation of WHOM ?

Immigrant minoritys/majorities depending on where you come from are supposed to be about 8% of the population of Our country.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_the_United_Kingdom

In the House Of Parliament we have 647 MPs and 704 unelected Senile Ignoramus's called the House Of Lords.

With a by no-means complete list of Non-Ethnic Representation. as Jack Straw, Margaret Hodge, Ed Miliband, David Miliband etc missing.


Adam Afriyie Conservative Windsor, Shadow Minister for Innovation, Universities and Skills.
Ashok Kumar, Dr.LabourMiddlesbrough South & East Cleveland.
David Lammy Labour Tottenham Minister of State for higher education and intellectual property, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.
Dawn ButlerLabourBrent South, Assistant government whip.
Diane AbbottLabourHackney North & Stoke Newington.
Keith Vaz LabourLeicester East.
Khalid Mahmood Labour Birmingham, Perry Barr.
Mark Hendrick Labour/Coop Preston.
Marsha Singh Labour Bradford West.
Mohammed Sarwar Labour Glasgow Central.
Parmjit DhandaLabourGloucester.
Sadiq Khan Labour Tooting PUSSi, Department for Communities and Local Government.
Shahid Malik Labour Dewsbury PUSS, Ministry of Justice.
Shailesh Vara Conservative North West Cambridgeshire Shadow Deputy Leader of the House.
Virendra SharmaLabourEaling.

Then add these Peers:

Adam Hafejee Patel, Lord Patel of Blackburn Labour.
Amirali Alibhai Bhatia, Lord Bhatia Crossbencher.
Ara Darzi, Baron Darzi of DenhamLabourPUSSi, Department of Health.
Bhikhu Chotalal Parekh, Lord Parekh Labour.
Bill Morris, Lord Morris of Handsworth Labour.
Herman George Ouseley, Lord Ousely Crossbencher.
John Taylor, Lord Taylor of Warwick Conservative.
Kamlesh Kumar Patel, Lord Patel of Bradford Labour Government whip.
Kumar Bhattacharyya, Lord Bhattacharyya Labour.
Lola Young, Baroness Young of Hornsey Crossbencher.
Lydia Dunn, Baroness Dunn Crossbencher.
Meghnad Jagdishchandra Desai, Lord Desai Labour.
Michael Nazir-Ali, Bishop of Rochester Non-affiliated.
Mohamed Sheikh, Lord Sheikh Conservative.
Narendra Babubhai Patel, Lord Patel Crossbencher.
Navnit Dholakia, Lord Dholakia Liberal Democrat.
Nazir Ahmed, Lord Ahmed Labour.
Patricia Janet Scotland, Baroness Scotland LabourAttorney General.
Pola Manzila Uddin, Baroness UddinLabour.
Pratap Chidamner Chitnis, Lord Chitnis Crossbencher.
Raj Kumar Bagri, Lord Bagri Conservative.
Rosalind Patricia-Anne Howells, Baroness Howells of St Davids Labour.
Sayeeda Warsi, Baroness Warsi Conservative.
Shreela Flather, Baroness Flather Conservative.
Shriti Vadera, Baroness Vadera Labour PUSS, Minister for economic competitiveness and small business (joint with the Cabinet Office), Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
Swraj Paul, Lord Paul Labour.
Tarsem King, Lord King of West Bromwich.
Usha Kumari Prashar, Baroness Prashar Labour.
Valerie Amos, Baroness Amos Labour.
Victor Adebowale, Lord Adebowale Crossbencher.
Waheed Alli, Lord Alli Labour.


This for 8% of the population, seems a bit Over-representative.

Have any of these represented in any way shape or form any Indigenous Populations within their "Constituencies" ?
If so by what % 90+ ?

Anyone know of any work done for the Indigenous Electorate within their spheres of influence ?

THE TRUE FACE OF ISLAM - THE ISLAMIFICATION OF PARLIAMENT.

New Labours betrayal of the Indigenous Christian population of these Isles.
The Gerrymandering and Positioning of Non-Ethnic, Non-Christian Britons into positions of Power over you.

Lib/Lab/Con all the same party but 3 different coloured hats to suit everyone, especially if their foreign.





Malik seems happy about the 9.1 BILLION of YOUR £££££ given to ISLAMIC COUNTRYS.
That's ok though, it's "RINGFENCED".

Destroy the TRAITOROUS New Labour Party - VOTE BNP.

Friday, 12 March 2010

IS THE BBC FOR THE BNP?



After watching BBC1 news tonight I was left wondering "are the BBC on our side or are they thick?"
Nick Griffin gave a superb interview stating that it was a dangerous precedent when the government could dictate an opposition party's policies. The BBC then crowed that we would be liable for £70,000 costs.

Next on the news was Baroness Uddin avoiding prosecution by the CPS for her blatent fiddling of expenses, followed by the news of her investigation by the standards board of the House of Lords for the same offence. So some people still think she fiddled in spite of the CPS's failure to prosecute.

Next came the case of the muslim child starved to death by her mother and the absent ugly father complaining about social services neglect.(Lessons will no doubt be learnt by the latter organisation). Who ever learns these lessons I don't know but there seems an awful lot of them.

After that we had the story of the control of some jails by muslims and the sometimes forceable conversion of people to the islamic cause and the violence entailed in this and the propagandising of Jihad in these jails.

After on North West news we were told that the father of "the British boy" kidnapped in Pakistan was aiding the search for his child here in Britain. They really care about their kids, these people don't they?

Then on "Newsnight" we had the Limp Dems discussing whether they would join the Tories or Labour in a hung parliament with the statement that the policy of that party needed a 75% majority of voting members to change their policies.

Is this not our "get out of jail free card"?
Any malicious group wanting to alter our policies would need such a majority to change our policies which is impossible.

I note on the main BNP website membership applications are flooding in already, as people see the injustice of this Government backed attack on our democratic rights and the dangers to our society of this colonisation.

Again we will show the effect of my favourite law (Murphy's Law), the law of unintended consequences. This will be ever more evident in the next weeks.

So is the BBC on our side? Of course not, but they are just as ignorant of human nature as Gordon Brown is about basic economics.

SO THANKYOU BBC, you have done us a good turn although you did not realise it.

BRITISH TAXPAYER RE-ARMING THE INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT.

Wait till the Cuts in services start and your Taxes go up (Council Tax Rise of 1.9%) to start.
Yet our wealth is being given away to Country's whose Military Arsenals and Military might, dwarf the British Militarys fighting capabilities.
Why the hell are we paying for it ?



"
Pakistan's navy has successfully test-fired missiles and torpedoes from ships, submarines and aircraft in the Arabian sea, officials say.

The tests were followed by a statement saying they sent a "clear message to forces having nefarious designs".

India and Pakistan regularly test their missile systems and they normally notify one another ahead of such tests.

Last month the two sides held their first formal talks since the November 2008 Mumbai attacks." [..]

The British Taxpayer is paying £9.1 BILLION in Foreign aid under the DFID.

"The Budget, presented today by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, means that the UK government is keeping its promises to the world's poorest people and remains committed to achieving the Millennium Development Goals. The government's forecast for overseas aid (known as official development assistance - ODA) for 2010-11 remains at £9.1 billion as we pledged in the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) in 2007."

We have Injured Servicemen receiving a pittance in Battle Injury compensation schemes, yet Abdul and his mates only have to ask and the TREASONUS BRITISH GOVERNMENT GIVES.
We have Pensioners who, after the last cold Winter, have died through cold related illnessess through being in Fuel Poverty.
Either that or Starve to death.
From the moment a BNP Government is declared then our Pensioners will be more Secure and our Heros honoured not spat at.

We can still make Britain a Place "Fit For Heros", Young and Old alike.



ROLL UP ROLL UP - JOIN THE SAVIOURS OF BRITAIN !



Membership applications to join the British National Party are now again open despite the state’s best efforts to subvert the party and democracy, Nick Griffin MEP has announced.

Speaking after the conclusion of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) court case today, Mr Griffin said the court had in effect ruled that political parties could not ask its members to endorse policies which oppose mass immigration.

“The court ruled that sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.3 of the BNP’s new constitution could not be set as conditions for membership of the party as they would discriminate against ethnics,” Mr Griffin said.

Section 3.2.1 of the BNP’s new constitution reads as follows:

Our party is a party of British Nationalism, both ethnic and civic, and we are committed to the principle of national sovereignty in all our British Homeland affairs and of self determination and sovereignty in all Indigenous British affairs.

We are pledged to the continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence of the unity and of the integrity of the Indigenous British and of the government of the countries of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and of Eire, which together, and as further expanded in Schedule 1 (“Interpretation Rules”), are referred to in this, our constitution, as our “British Homeland.”

Section 3.2.3 reads as follows:

We are pledged to stemming and reversing the immigration into our British Homeland that has, without the express consent of the Indigenous British, taken place since 1948, and to restoring and maintaining, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the Indigenous British as the overwhelming majority in the make-up of the population and expression of culture in each part of our British Homeland.

“The court has ruled that these clauses, which are part of the membership conditions as stated in section 4 of the constitution, makes it impossible for ethnics to join the BNP,” Mr Griffin said.

“We, of course, disagree with the court’s opinion.

“There is no correlation between being opposed to mass immigration and the opening of membership of the party,” Mr Griffin said, adding that he knew members of ethnic minorities who were just as opposed to mass immigration as any indigenous British member of the party.

“Section 3 of the BNP constitution is protected and cannot be changed except by an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) of the party,” Mr Griffin went on.

“The new constitution grants the party’s leader the power to change all non-protected parts of that document to comply with the law, without the need for EGMs.

“Section 4, which deals with the requirements for membership and includes the demand that members support all the principles of the party, is not protected.

“I have, therefore, with immediate effect changed the section 4 requirements, as I am entitled to do, to comply with the court order,” Mr Griffin continued.

“What this means is that people can apply to join the BNP without having to endorse and support the principles of the party.

“Everyone knows this is a mad situation, and it has set an astonishing and extremely dangerous precedent for all parties.

“It is a complete subversion of democracy and is in reality an attempt by the state to order the citizenry what policies they can or cannot believe in.

“The bottom line is that the BNP’s policies remain exactly as they were, particularly the demand for an end to mass immigration.

“I have changed the non-write protected constitution to comply with the court order and the amended version will be published online well within the 30 days set our constitution.

“Membership applications are therefore are now open and the 7000-strong backlog will be processed in the order in which they applied,” Mr Griffin said, adding that any ethnic who had applied to join the party would wait in turn like anyone else to have their applications processed.

Join the only party commited to protecting the Future of Our Land and Our People


BNP

By post to: The British National Party, PO Box 5057, Nuneaton, CV11 9FP.
Telephone: 02070 783269
Email: enquiries@bnp.org.uk




Thursday, 11 March 2010

POLICE DONATE TO PARTY FUNDS

THANKYOU POLICE FOR YOUR DONATION TO BNP PARTY FUNDS.


Several Party members have received payments totalling in the teens of thousands following their wrongful arrests in 2008 by Merseyside police.
This is good news for democracy and should be a lesson to the PC fascists controlling the police, that we will resist their Stazi style tactics and wherever possible exact revenge.
In a way this has been good for our party bringing in much needed cash to fight this oppression (and of course paying for well deserved holidays for those wrongfully arrested).

There are more cases pending of people being taken from their homes on spurious charges so that the chief police officers can curry favour with their political bosses. We of course shall be seeking redress in these cases as well.
Unfortunately the taxpayer has to foot the bill. If justice were to be done it should be the chief constables or their politcal paymasters Labour and the Tories who paid it.

There have been other infringements of our liberty closer to home and these will also be contested vigorously and again redress sought.

These underhanded tactics only harden our determination to combat our country's progression to a police state.
As the great Issac Newton stated "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction", and there will be from us if we are oppressed.

Don't get me wrong. We are in favour of policing and the maintenance of law and order but when this noble aim is subverted for political motives the concept loses its validity and people lose their respect for the police.
The police are EMPLOYED BY THE PEOPLE to protect us from crime. We are therefore their bosses and they should do what WE want rather than serve the political agenda dictated by the government.

Lay off decent people and uphold justice PLEASE.

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

BNP DOUBLES ITS SUPPORT

BNP support has doubled from two to four per cent and the SNP and Greens have each added one point to their support with three per cent each.

The Harris poll for Metro found the Conservatives dropped two per cent to 37 points in the same period, with Labour losing one point support at 29 per cent.
But the biggest losers have been the Liberal Democrats, dropping four points in the past fortnight to just 18 per cent.......

Full story click here:Minority parties have gained support over the past two weeks as Labour and the Tories sling mud over their tax avoiding ‘non-dom’ donors.

yaz