MORE WIGAN "ENRICHMENT"

I see from the Evening Post that there are now 500 asylum seekers in Wigan speaking 50 languages, many from countries where there is no risk of perseqution.

The independant Wigan Refugee and Migrant Forum (WARM) (who pays for them?) states that there is a lack of cultural awareness in the local population and evidence of "far right" (that's us folks) in the area.
Why should we have cultural awareness? Why should we welcome these uninvited guests?

Who decided that they should come here? We certainly did not.
They say they want the poor housing conditions of these immigrants to be addressed. What about Wiganers who can not get a house?

They want "hate crimes" to be reported however trivial. More work for Elliot then.
They say we need them as our population is ageing. Do they not have children or will they not?
They say the immigrants will go back home after working here. Pull the other one, most of them do not work now

We don't need them nor want them. We have plenty of unemployed people to look after our old people and to pay them well if they got rid of the parasitic bureaucracy in Wigan Metro (that's people like you Elliot).

We have no wish to be enriched nor vibrant. We want our true Wigan spirit of honest hard working Lancastrians. We have not voted for this invasion.
I note there was no comments section after this article. I wonder why?

Far right in this area? "You aint seen nothing yet"

THE REAL LDV STORY

Here’s the BBC version of the story about the shut-down of LDV

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7904918.stm

And here’s what really happened

http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2009/02/british-jobs-for-austrian-workers.html

Read them both.

A British government? For British people?

We know about the government attitude. Given the silence from all the other political parties we can make a fair guess at their attitude.

So who to vote for to get that British government for British people?

That question’s a no-brainer really isn’t it. The answer is in the name:

BRITISH National Party.

It does what it says on the tin.

Update:

From the BBC story:

" Russian parent firm Gaz said ... "

From the EU Referendum story:

" As it was, shorn of any prospects of participating in a valuable £1 billion-plus contract, in 2005 LDV was put into administration and rescued by a venture capital firm, a year later then Hoovered up by the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, owner of the Russian military truck-maker Gaz. He got it for the knock-down price of £50 million, a fraction of what it would have been worth had it secured the MoD order. "

All part of the scandal. Do read both versions in full.

The BBC should have all its activities subjected to a thorough judicial investigation.

Morg
.

LETTER TO MELANIE PHILIPS

There was an article in today's Mail by Melanie Phillips re the increasing popularity of the BNP. Much of it was fair but she could not resist talking of "The odious BNP" and calling us neo fascists. This prompted me to send her an e mail (whether she reads it or not is another matter but she may), which is reproduced below. In it I attempted to explain that we are not as portrayed and the really odious fascists are those of the major parties.
See what you think.


Dear Ms Phillips,

I am a retired GP from a large medical family. I was involved in local government as a Labour councillor until local government re organisation and work commitments made it impossible to continue. I topped the poll every time I stood.
I have been a member of the BNP for 6 years and was proud to be named "on the list" last November.

I take exception to you calling our Party fascist (odious is a matter of opinion) Surely the fascist epithet should be applied to the Labour Party,who, with the silent connivance of the Tories, when not killing and maiming in illegal wars have presided over the squandering of our national assets to subsidise the parasitic bankers of the City and the idle underclass whose reluctance to work is used as an excuse for flooding our country with immigrants.
We have not advocated imposing our "democracy" on reluctant Arabs nor expropriated land belonging to others as has Israel.

Your accusation of "populism" typifies the attitude of the out of touch metropolitan elite who seek to keep we "plebs" down. Populism is democracy, or do you not believe in democracy?.

Nick Griffin was prosecuted for a "speech crime" ie stating an opinion (surely an oxymoron in a so called "free society") He also supports Israel in the Arab Israeli conflict, unlike most "liberals" and "anti fascists".
I have visited Auschwitz and have no doubt about the horror and evil of the place although have to question the numbers. But one murder is too many.
The fact that it is a criminal offence in some countries to even doubt the veracity of the Jewish holocaust does make one smell a rat. All other atrocities can be debated, why not this?

As you say there is nothing wrong with patriotism, all peoples exhibit that sentiment, but this is rapidly eroded by mass immigration of people of different races and cultures and we arrive at a Balkanisation of the country and consequent strife.
Countries as disparate as Japan, China, India,Russia or Israel do not allow unfettered immigration so why should we?

Our party is neither fascist nor racist. All we ask is to have and to hold this small overcrowded island for us in our interests. We do not seek to impose our values on any other country and nor do we say "send all immigrants back".
As you say the people of this country feel betrayed by the major parties. I meet Tories and Labour people daily, and during canvassing and the change in attitude is palpable.
Continually ignoring the people gives them a feeling of impotence and is the cause of low election turn outs.

Further manifestations of contempt of the masses by the elite would lead to civil strife. This is what I as a member of the BNP work to avoid.
Please therefore desist from portraying us as the ogres.
Extremists we are NOT.

Yours sincerely,

Dr C E Mather (MB ChB), phone 01744 892430.
Sandyforth Farm,
Ashton Road,
Billinge, Wigan WN5 7XZ.

P S If you want a public debate I would not give you as easy a run as our Lee Barnes.did recently. Go on, I dare you.

Limp Wristed Labour "attack" Back?

On opening the front door on Friday evening I found amongst the next generation of take-away menu's, a Labour party publication namely called PACT! And this from our very own Leigh South Labour councillors. PACT being a newsletter for Partners & Communties Together, yawn!

Now, given that a number of our BNP activists had been out and about the previous weekend delivering in excess of two thousand leaflets in the Leigh South area and beyond, it was not exactly unexpected that they may come out to counter our publication? And, they have! Albeit with a Winter 2008 heading? Telling us how 87% of people interviewed for PACT said that Leigh South was a good place to live! I agree, it is a good place to live, if only we are given the same privileges afforded to other's that haven't been here as long as we have!

Anyway, I can now sleep easier at night knowing that the top five concerns of those 87% of Leigh South residents interviewed have now been addressed, and in particular, pooper scoopers are to be issued "free of charge" in certain area's of our ward to combat lazy dog owners! And additionally, the rubbish left at the bottom of Hurst Street is to be removed! I can fully understand that these are issues to be addressed, but, these are not the issues I get told about when I am out and about, certainly not!

For just one example: the couple who told me about their child who cannot gain a place at the local primary school even though they are well within the school's catchment area, because it's over subscribed, and yet the school allow's children of immigrants to bypass the system and take these places ahead of our own in the name of diversity! And this happened just after OFSTED attended?

That is just one "real" issue for the people of Leigh South and ignoring the fact that we are being displaced in our very own area of Leigh should send alarm bells ringing to Cllr Rigby who's next in-line in 2010 and then Cllr O'Brien for my colleague in 2011 and last but not least the anti-white racist Cllr Anderson in 2012.

I have submitted a Freedom of Information request to determine just how they attained their findings for this PACT publication. I will let you know the outcome in due course!

ABOLITION OF FREEDOM ACT 2009

One of the problems with the erosion of liberty in Britain over the last
decade was that the public failed to pay attention to what was happening in
Parliament. Laws that fundamentally challenged our traditions of rights and liberty and flew in the face of the Human Rights Act (“HRA”) were passed with relatively little debate. Few grasped the impact they would have on our society and Ministers were able to brush aside protests with assurances that their desire to protect us was equal to their respect for civil liberties.

The difficulty campaigners faced was to press home the argument about the
scale of the loss. An account was needed to show that the legislative programme,
which swept away centuries old rights and transferred so much power from the
individual to the state, actually existed. Now we have that evidence and the
Convention on Modern Liberty can demonstrate with confidence what Britain has
lost and discuss how this crisis of liberty took root in one of the world’s oldest
democracies and what to do about it.

This report by the UCL Student Human Rights Programme (“UCLSHRP”)
is a concise and approachable inventory of the loss. It is a profoundly disturbing
document, even for those who thought they knew about the subject, for it not only describes the wholesale removal of rights that were apparently protected by the HRA and set down nearly 800 years ago in Magna Carta, it also shows how the unarticulated liberties that we assumed were somehow guaranteed by British culture have been compromised.

The same is true of constitutional safeguards that
were once considered beyond the reach of a democratically elected legislature.
The attack is as broad as it is deep. Over 25 Acts of Parliament and some 50
individual measures are involved.

It concerns you all, so please read it all. It's not a particularly lengthy document. And while you're reading it, do bear in mind the repeated incidents of legislation being introduced ostensibly for one purpose, then being used for another. For example, can anyone even begin to explain why anti-terror legislation should be used against an Icelandic bank? Yes - that does read 'Icelandic'. Iceland? Terrorist? ... there's something wrong with this picture isn't there. Or Walter Wolfgang, a former internee in the Nazi concentration camp system, arrested under anti-terrorist legislation for shouting one word - "Nonsense" - at Jack Straw.

Read it - everyone needs to know this stuff because what is legislated against immigrants, terrorists or indeed anyone else today, WILL be used against you tomorrow.

Would you like to bet otherwise? Based on experience of the past 12 years?

http://www.modernliberty.net/downloads/abolition_of_freedom.pdf

Morg
.

A GOOD MEETING, PROGRESS MADE

Another successful meeting was held at our usual venue last night with a "full house" in attendance.

A report was given of our recent progress and plans for the future in this critical Euro election year. We are intending icreasing our leafletting operations especially in the areas South of Wigan as we have been getting good feedback in spite of not having concentrating in these areas. People are increasingly fed up of the lies, incompetence and greed of the other parties.
Members were informed of the offer of a large new venue which we will be taking advantage of in the coming weeks.
Credit was given to members who had worked hard leafletting in Leigh and Pemberton while realising much still needs to be done.

The first speaker was Eddie O'Sullivan, Salford organiser who was recently described in a newspaper article as "deceptively friendly". He certainly is friendly but I did not notice any deception in his demeanour.

Eddie explained the depths to which the fascists of the Labour Party were prepared to stoop in order to prevent our lawful leafletting exposing their lies and discrimination against the white unemployed of Manchester.
This included a jobs fair for black and ethnic minorities at Manchester town hall from which white people were excluded.
While leafletting explaining this blatant discrimination they were monitored by over 20 police and a helicopter.

At another public meeting they attended incognito they managed to ask questions of the organisers which the latter were not able to answer. Derek Adams the well known activist was not allowed to enter the meeting.
So much for a public meeting! So much fear of the truth!
Following the interval we were entertained by one of our favourite speakers, Dr Paul Rimmer who spoke movingly of the threat to our society and its' Christian heritage by the rapid influx of people of alien faiths. He said he had nothing against them as people but that the numbers were diluting our heritage and culture, but he saw that people were waking up to the danger and he had faith that our party would soon break through in spite of the obstacles put in our path.

Some new people attended and were favourably impressed, this being one of the objectives of our meetings, to gain new supporters and dispel the false impressions given by the media and other parties whose only defence against our arguments is to vilify us while refusing to debate.
A good collection was held together with a raffle and 5 full penny boxes were returned all of which will go to fighting the Euro elections.

Thanks to all who attended.

MEAN MUMS

I picked this up off the net somewhere. I can't remember where, but it impressed me enough that I filed it.

Mean Mums

Someday when my children are old enough to understand the logic that motivates a parent, I will tell them, as my Mean Mum told me:

I loved you enough . . . to ask where you were going, with whom,and what time you would be home.

I loved you enough to be silent and let you discover that your new best friend was a creep.

I loved you enough to stand over you for two hours while you cleaned your room, a job that should have taken 15 minutes.

I loved you enough to let you see anger, disappointment, and tears in my eyes. Children must learn that their parents aren’t perfect.

I loved you enough to let you assume the responsibility for your actions even when the penalties were so harsh they almost broke my heart.

But most of all, I loved you enough . . . to say NO when I knew you would hate me for it.

Those were the most difficult battles of all. I’m glad I won them, because in the end you won, too. And someday when your children are old enough to understand the logic that motivates parents, you will tell them.

Was your Mum mean? I know mine was. We had the meanest mother in the whole world! While other kids ate candy for breakfast, we had to have cereal, eggs, and toast.

When others had a Pepsi and a Twinkie for lunch, we had to eat sandwiches.

And you can guess our mother fixed us a dinner that was different from what other kids had, too.

Mother insisted on knowing where we were at all times. You’d think we were convicts in a prison. She had to know who our friends were, and what we were doing with them. She insisted that if we said we would be gone for an hour, we would be gone for an hour or less.

We were ashamed to admit it, but she had the nerve to break the Child Labour Laws by making us work. We had to wash the dishes, make the beds, learn to cook, vacuum the floor, do laundry, empty the trash and all sorts of cruel jobs. I think she would lie awake at night thinking of more things for us to do.

She always insisted on us telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. By the time we were teenagers, she could read our minds and had eyes in the back of her head. Then, life was really tough!

Mother wouldn’t let our friends just honk the horn when they drove up. They had to come up to the door so she could meet them. While everyone else could date when they were 12 or 13, we had to wait until we were 16..

Because of our mother we missed out on lots of things other kids experienced. None of us have ever been caught shoplifting, vandalizing others' property or ever arrested for any crime. It was all her fault.

Now that we have left home, we are all educated, honest adults. We are doing our best to be mean parents just like Mum was.

I think that is what’s wrong with the world today. It just doesn’t have enough mean mums!

Morg
.