Quote. Unquote.

Anyone else got any complaints about Islam?

“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”
Thomas Jefferson

Morg
.

good political thinking, about leaving the EU:

Thinking It Through

This is a critique for quiet consideration within the pro-independence movement . An “in/out” EU referendum may well be part of the mechanism by which Britain eventually leaves the EU but we know that the EU protagonists regard “in” votes as final and binding and “out” votes as merely provisional. For some idea of the likely forces of manipulation which would be available to the “in” side, I ask people to refer to the Eurofacts Document “How they swung it in the early Seventies” and to the Anthony Royle report, now released under the Thirty Year rule, of the press and public relations campaign waged by HMG to influence public opinion in favour of EEC membership at that time.

1. Firstly I acknowledge the contribution which the Democracy Movement has made to the pro independence cause. I have distributed many of their leaflets, arranged meetings at which they were represented and have been very grateful for their input over the years. The DM has been the prime mover of the People's Pledge campaign for a referendum.

2. My main concerns about an “in/out” referendum are set out in my September letter which appeared in “The Euro Realist” and they apply just as much to the People's Pledge campaign as to any other.

3. Before writing that letter, I consulted Dr. Anthony Coughlan of the Irish National Platform who has experience of both winning and losing  referendum campaigns concerning the EU. I did not put the question to him directly but he did not mention receiving any approach from British referendum campaigners (which he surely would, if he had). I am sure our country's foes will have learned the Irish lesson of what wins and what loses a referendum and was rather surprised that the independence campaigners had not thought to do so.

4. Dr. Coughlan gave his opinion that the weight of outside money and influence rather than the information for and against the referendum proposal, which used to be produced by the Referendum Commissioner before the poll, was what decided the result. In a time of economic uncertainty, it was the fear of the people, not the will of the people which determined the result. Whilst he was careful not to try to tell us what to do, he gave his opinion that an “out” referendum could only be carried with any certainty by the whole-hearted support of the party in government, using all its many influences. If a referendum campaign were to be fought, he believed it would be wiser to campaign for the referendum on the Lisbon treaty (promised by all parties) or (say) The European Arrest Warrant or the Common Fisheries Policy (from which the Conservatives once promised our release). A favourable vote in such a referendum would (I paraphrase) throw such a spanner in the works as to come close to an “out” vote. Yet, if lost, it would merely be a lost battle and not a lost war - which would certainly be the case if an “in/out” referendum resulted in an “in” vote.

5. To fix wholly and solely on an “in/out” referendum is to declare the chosen means of fighting to an enemy who will have the advantage of making the dispositions of his far superior forces of money, influence and persuasion well in advance and of fixing the time of the engagement to his best advantage. It will not be a fair fight. Most of it will take place long before the immediate campaign before the poll - without rules and with all the advantage to big money and entrenched influence. Reports of the way in which this was done in the Seventies are available but I have seen no evidence that they have been taken into consideration by any pro-referendum campaigner. The responses I have heard or had  reported to me are “Public opinion is moving our way” (equivalent to “we hope something will turn up”) and “That is a completely separate issue” (to actually getting a referendum).

6. Now, I think that a referendum - or pressure for one - may well be part of the mechanism by which we leave the EU - but it is not essential nor the only one. A parliamentary majority of one would be sufficient. As far as I know, nobody has given thought to an American-style write-in campaign to MPs, maintained and sustained over time. All eurosceptic organisations have urged their members to speak and write to their MPs but there has never been any serious organisation to build a disciplined core of (say) 2 dozen people in every constituency to keep the issue before MPs and media perpetually. Individuals have written, gone to see their MPs, asked a question at a meeting and usually got a dusty answer. Then they have retreated to the comfort zone of like-minded eurosceptics to complain about it and the MPs (for the most part) have heard nothing more. So they can say with all truthfulness (or as much as can be expected) that “Europe” is not an issue which troubles their constituents.

7. I am writing this personally and not as a

 view of CIB but I can assert this. CIB has for years 

issued invitations for the Democracy Movement to 

attend its committee meetings. They have always 

been declined. 

Perhaps this is unfair, but I get the 

impression that they feel that we volunteer 

provincials are beneath consideration though 

worthwhile summoning as spear carriers when our 

betters have decided what we should do. 

Nonetheless, if I had thought the campaign was the 

right thing to do, I would have supported it to the hilt immediately.

CIB also tried repeatedly to arrange discussions with the other main referendum campaign but appointments were either refused or cancelled after having been made. I was horrified to hear of the attempt of Daniel Hannan and Douglas Carswell, in front of press representatives, to bounce the Better Off Out Campaign into disbanding and joining with Keith Vaz, Caroline Lucas and other choice europhile specimens in a “Better with a Referendum” campaign. Whilst the Better Off Out campaign does not commit its members to any binding course of action, MPs who join it know that they do so at the cost of forfeiting any prospect of promotion. With the commitment downgraded to merely demanding a referendum, that might no longer apply. If pro-independence MPs were persuaded join the government, they would be lost to the movement. The Pledge campaign makes no distinction between MPs and candidates who are committed to EU withdrawal and those who believe deeply in EU membership and think that a referendum is a good way of locking us in. It will therefore promote rabid federalists as being equally as desirable candidates as solid sovereignists. Similarly, Keith Vaz is such a known careerist that he would not have offered his support to the People's Pledge without clearing it with the top leadership of the Labour party. One of the Democracy Movement's best leaflets was in the style of a detergent advert - “New miracle Vaz won't  wash”! He still doesn't. I think it possible that Labour may use the campaign to show “Tory splits” on Europe. Mr Cameron might then “do a Wilson” and call a referendum earlier rather than later to lance the boil of Tory euroscepticism - and he could easily win. He nailed his colours to the EU mast on Al Jazeera.

8. A referendum has beeen held on the”Alternative Vote” system. The Electoral Reform Society funded the “yes” campaign massively with money and with the loan of staff. This is a straw in the wind. The society has a commercial subsidiary which offers “electoral services” to public authorities. My own council uses it for part of the registration of electors. It is highly

profitable and would get massively more so, if a more complicated voting system were introduced. There are hundreds of such “Third Sector” organisations (as officialdom calls them), now with greater freedom to promote political objectives thanthey had under the old Charities legislation. Many are lavishly funded by the EU. As far as I know, there has been no attempt to list, quantify and evaluate the electoral pressure which such organisations could apply in an “in/out” EU referendum - on either side. It is worth noting that there are moves in the EU parliament to allow EU funds to be used in referendum campaigns within member states and that the proposals for pan EU political parties are quite well developed.

 It is worth noting that there are moves in the EU parliament to allow EU funds to be used in referendum campaigns within member states.

9. Neither, as far as I know, has anybody  considered institutional bias in the electoral process  itself. The postal voting system is known to be demonstrably corrupt, especially in culturally enriched areas. The few cases that have come to court are probably just the tip of an iceberg. There is a widespread feeling that the process of voter registration may have been compromised by outsourcing to private companies. Private Eye identified one such company with close links to the Labour Party. Then there is the Electoral Commission itself. There is a statutory requirement in the Elections Political Parties and Referendum Act for the Commission to “inform” people about the institutions of the EU. That can be interpreted in various ways and anybody who has received the reports of the Irish National Platform on the extreme partiality of the Irish electoral authorities would feel uneasy about the possible behaviour of this archetypal New Labour quango in a crucial referendum.

10. In my opinion, anybody starting out with the intention to win a referendum to get us out of the EU would have begun by dealing with such considerations as a first priority before even thinking of campaigning for a referendum. It is the elementary duty of any commander, who means to win, to “appreciate the ground from the enemy's position”, work out what forces the enemy may reasonably be expected to have and to assure himself of having at least local superiority to defeat them decisively. If he hasn't got that, he may fight a spoiling action or retreat - but that is not a possibility in a referendum campaign which is a win or lose, frontal assault. On present showing it could easily turn out like the Charge of the Light Brigade. As a French general remarked of that occasion “C'est manifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre”. We cannot afford such an heroic failure, however magnificent.

11. None of the proponents of an “in/out” referendum appears to have given any thought as to how the process of disengagement from the EU would be carried out, if an “out” vote by the electors were achieved but the government in power remained composed of “old style” politicians who were reasonably comfortable with life under the EU and not passionately and totally committed to leaving it. Even with a firm political commitment by a majority of MPs to independence, the degree of stubborn inertia in government departments and official bodies would be enormous with huge numbers of civil service apparatchiks and quangocrats able to ambush even an enthusiastic government into repeated pitfalls and disasters. With a less than enthusiastic government and parliament, the situation would be a happy hunting ground for functionaries of the “Yes, Minister” type to wrongfoot their nominal political masters repeatedly in the highly intricate business of disentangling constitution and administration from the EU web, which has been woven for over fifty years to prevent any such thing from happening. We now have politicians and officials who look like us and talk like us but whose

main loyalties have been elsewhere for decades. The present situation could not have occurred without them. 

The inertia of vested official interests in (say) the Foreign Office would be enormous. The extent to which long-established official attitudes within departments can frustrate even a determined government with a large majority has been demonstrated repeatedly over the years. To take a  domestic example, the Thatcher government set out to reverse declining standards in state education with the idea of insisting on a basic national curriculum to ensure that, at least,  the “Three Rs” were taught in schools. The “progressive” educational establishment was able to ambush this simple idea and turn the national curriculum into a complicated, prescriptive, jargon-laden  monster which is  now a major part of the problem. The doctrinaire educational establishment was able to divert and defeat the attempt to raise standards and to deceive not very bright politicians by “rising standards”, manufactured by making the exams easier. How much greater is the opportunity for that sort of obstructionism in untangling a project like the EU which affects so many departments of state and entrenched official interests? A referendum victory would be entirely hollow without MPs or government committed heart and soul to making independence a success and willing to confront and, if necessary to sack, obstructive officials - even if they are Permanent Secretaries. 

12. If a referendum is called, whether soon or late, you can be assured that CIB will strain all its energies and use every available penny provided by the generosity of our members, living and dead, to achieve a vote for independence but that alone will not deliver independence. It will only be the beginning of an almighty struggle, amounting to revolution against the new system of government, created in the last forty years. 

In the meantime, I believe it is best to continue our efforts to influence opinion in favour of independence - both within Parliament and elsewhere, taking every opportunity from the increasingly desperate and ultimately unsustainable crises to which the euro currency will be subject. We should also seek help from our members and the wider movement to develop a positive vision of an independent Britain and its place in the world. 

This is a plea for a pro thinking campaign not an anti referendum one.  The independence movement has not thought strategically or tactically.  It is perhaps personified by that rather splendid crusader knight of  the Daily Express, standing on the white cliffs of Dover. Our enemy is not across the Channel but here amongst us in our own political and official class. It is only by their actions and policies that the EU has any sway over us at all. It is against them that the knight must wield his sword.

Edward Spalton is vice-chair of the Campaign for an Independent Britain (CIB)

http://subrosa-blonde.blogspot.com/2011/05/inout-eu-referendum.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FbUee+%28SUBROSA%29

 Morg

.

The Liberator

"What Good Can A Handgun Do Against an Army?"

A friend of mine forwarded me a question a friend of his had posed:

"If/when our Federal Government comes to pilfer, pillage, plunder our property and destroy our lives, what good can a handgun do against an army with advanced weaponry, tanks, missiles, planes, or whatever else they might have at their disposal to achieve their nefarious goals? (I'm not being facetious: I accept the possibility that what happened in Germany, or similar, could happen here; I'm just not sure that the potential good from an armed citizenry in such a situation outweighs the day-to-day problems caused by masses of idiots who own guns.)"

If I may, I'd like to try to answer that question. I certainly do not think the writer facetious for asking it. The subject is a serious one to which I have given much research and considerable thought. I believe that upon the answer to this question depends the future of our Constitutional republic, our liberty and perhaps our lives.

My friend Aaron Zelman, one of the founders of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership told me once:

"If every Jewish and anti-nazi family in Germany had owned a Mauser rifle and twenty rounds of ammunition AND THE WILL TO USE IT (emphasis supplied - MBV), Adolf Hitler would be a little-known footnote to the history of the Weimar Republic."

Note well that phrase: "and the will to use it," for the simply-stated question, "What good can a handgun do against an army?", is in fact a complex one and must be answered at length and carefully.

It is a military question.

It is also a political question.

But above all it is a moral question which strikes to the heart of what makes men free, and what makes them slaves.

First, let's answer the military question.

Most military questions have both a strategic and a tactical component. Let's first consider the tactical.

A friend of mine owns an instructive piece of history. It is a small, crude pistol, made out of sheet-metal stampings by the U.S. during World War II. While it fits in the palm of your hand and is a slowly-operated, single-shot arm, it's powerful .45 caliber projectile will kill a man with brutal efficiency. With a short, smooth-bore barrel it can reliably kill only at point blank ranges, so its use requires the will (brave or foolhardy) to get in close before firing. It is less a soldier's weapon than an assassin's tool. The U.S. manufactured them by the millions during the war, not for our own forces but rather to be air-dropped behind German lines to resistance units in occupied Europe and Asia. They cost exactly two dollars and ten cents to make.

Crude and slow (the fired case had to be knocked out of the breech by means of a little wooden dowel, a fresh round procured from the storage area in the grip and then manually reloaded and cocked. It was so wildly inaccurate it couldn't hit the broad side of a French barn at 50 meters, but to the Resistance man or woman who had no firearm it still looked pretty darn good.

The theory and practice of it was this: First, you approach a German sentry with your little pistol hidden in your coat pocket and, with Academy-award sincerity, ask him for a light for your cigarette (or the time the train leaves for Paris, or if he wants to buy some non-army-issue food or a half- hour with your "sister"). When he smiles and casts a nervous glance down the street to see where his Sergeant is, you blow his brains out with your first and only shot, then take his rifle and ammunition. Your next few minutes are occupied with "getting out of Dodge," for such critters generally go around in packs. After that (assuming you evade your late benefactor's friends) you keep the rifle and hand your little pistol to a fellow Resistance fighter so he can go get his own rifle.

Or, maybe, you then use your rifle to get a submachine gun from the Sergeant when he comes running. Perhaps you get very lucky and pickup a light machine gun, two boxes of ammunition and a haversack of hand grenades. With two of the grenades and the expenditure of a half-a-box of ammunition at a hasty roadblock the next night, you and your friends get a truck full of arms and ammunition. (Some of the cargo is sticky with "Boche" blood, but you don't mind, not terribly.)

Pretty soon you've got the best armed little maquis unit in your part of France, all from that cheap little pistol and the guts to use it.

 http://westernrifleshooters.blogspot.com/2008/07/vanderboegh-handgun-against-army-ten.html

Englishman, does that answer your query about Ukranian soldiers being used to police us?
Morg
.

EXACTLY WHAT IS BEING DONE TO US

Failed State Colonization – The Greatest Threat of Our Time
Look at a map of the world, and what you see are successful states and failed states. This is a map that transcends ethnicity and race. It is not dependent on resources or the starting level of technology. It’s not even dependent on wealth, or its level of distribution, Gulf petro-states with small populations can have rich subsidized per capita incomes, but they are still failed states dependent on a single resource and a vast army of foreign workers.
It was thought once that success would spread from the successful states to the failed states. That it was only a matter of passing along certain techniques, educating their leaders in modern universities and starting them off with some World Bank loans. But instead the reverse has happened. Rather than failed states becoming successful under the influence of successful states, successful states are failing under the influence of failed states.
Migration from failed states to successful states is leading the way to utter ruin. The Pakistanization of Europe and the Mexicanization of America are two examples of the phenomenon. But there are others. Cote d’Ivorie, one of the more prosperous African countries, has been taken over by Muslim migrant workers, with the armed backing of the UN. What happened resembled events in South Africa, but this time both sides were black. The difference was not racial, but religious. It is another example of an ongoing phenomenon. Failed State Colonization.
Failed State Colonization is the greatest threat of our time.
Read more: The Greatest Threat of Our Time

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2011/05/failed-state-colonization-greatest.html

http://sheikyermami.com/2011/05/28/sultan-knish-the-greatest-threat-of-our-time/

Morg
.

The Military Covenant

The government recently passed the Military Covenant into law and the Tories always like to present themselves as the party that looks after the armed forces, despite the fact that a close examination of what they say and what they do not matching up by any means.
So this comes as no surprise.

BBC.

Thousands of members of the Parachute Regiment and others could lose special payments for their parachuting skills, under MoD cost-cutting plans.

The Army may cut the number of troops trained to parachute in 16 Air Assault Brigade, lowering the number who qualify for the £180-a-month bonus.

The move would involve a 10% pay cut for the lowest-paid privates.

The MoD said most of the brigade's soldiers would remain fully trained to parachute.

However, it insisted no decisions had yet been taken on the extent of the changes

Currently almost 5,000 parachute-trained members of the armed forces receive the special supplement of nearly £6 a day in recognition of the extra risks and skills involved in parachuting.

The Daily Telegraph reported that cutting the so-called Para Pay bonus would save millions of pounds a year.

Save millions whilst wrecking the morale of one of our top regiments, sounds about right for the idiots who run this country to consider now doesn't it? However I suspect this is just a sound bite to see how the public will react and as seems usual for the political establishment of making things appear to be a lot worse than they are and when they come out with a much milder cut everyone will heave a sigh of relief, save only that it will still be a cut.
Our military deserve the best we can give them whilst they fight in a war they really can't win with equipment that's often enough unfit for purpose, often enough individual squaddies buy their own boots and personal gear. Meanwhile back in the MOD they're happy enough to squander taxpayers money on £1000 chairs, helicopters that don't work in bad weather and two aircraft carriers that won't have the fleet support vessels or aircraft.
Scrapping the MOD and starting from scratch would seem to be a far more cost effective solution to the treatment of our forces.

http://quietmanmyblog.blogspot.com/2011/05/kick-in-teeth.html

Morg
.

Urgent Action in Blackpool Saturday 28th May

Hi all,

Urgent Action in Blackpool Saturday 28th May

A short orderly march is being planned in Blackpool for this Saturday with an early start and finish, to lay a wreath outside the kebab shop at the centre of the grooming and murder of young white girls.

We are meeting, in Blackpool, at 9am and will be away by 11am, before the EDL arrive.

After we have laid the wreath, we will also be handing out leaflets;

'Our Children Are NOT Halal Meat'

The RV point, for members to meet up, will be given out on Friday, as I won't have it before then. Please make a note of my number, for assistance. 07855 167009.

If you can be there to help us, please contact me, Adam Walker, or Chris Vanns, as soon as possible.

This will be a very respectful and solemn occasion, to pay our respects to a young girl that has been murdered. Please be smartly dressed, as if you were attending the Cenotaph.

We will be gone before any rowdyness begins.

We look forward to seeing you this Saturday.

Regards

Mike Whitby

IN OTHER NEWS

Baron:

I've just nicked this and posted it here

http://wiganpatriot.blogspot.com/


Hope you don't mind too much.

Thanks.

We are definitely not alone ... whether they like us or not (and they don't)
The Farce Continues
Geert Wilders as Galileo

Geert Wilders took a bit of a vacation earlier this month, visiting Canada and Tennessee. Now everything has returned to normal, and he’s back in the dock in the Netherlands.

The Amsterdam court that is trying Mr. Wilders is engaged in a surgical operation for political purposes under the mandate of the Dutch ruling class. Its task is to excise the PVV leader from the Dutch body politic and restore the multicultural state to its previous dominance.

If there were ever any doubt that this is a kangaroo court, and that the verdict was determined well in advance, the following brief article would lay it to rest. Many thanks to our Dutch correspondent H. Numan for this translation from De Telegraaf:

Court: Wilders trial continues

AMSTERDAM - the court of Amsterdam decided on Monday the trial against PVV leader Geert Wilders will continue. At the beginning of this month, Wilders’ lawyer Bram Moszkowicz stated his client isn’t getting a fair trial and the case must be declared inadmissible by the prosecution.

The unfair trial was caused by amongst others Tom Schalken, councillor of the court, and in that position responsible for issuing the order for the prosecution to continue the trial against Wilders. The politician is on trial for sowing hatred and discrimination and insulting a group.


The order to continue the trial is according to Moszkowicz a conviction. Also, Schalken had tried to influence the expert-witness Hans Jansen, Arabist. Other influential magistrates had influenced the trial, by publicly voicing their own personal opinions.

The court rejected the arguments of the lawyer.

Morg
.

PAKISTANI MUSLIMS RAPE DRUNKEN TEENAGER.

Hussnain Ahmed Omar Ali

Two men who raped a teenage girl from a care home have been jailed. The pair drove their victim, a resident at a Manchester home, to a secluded spot in Alderley Edge before launching their attack.

They had picked up the girl – whom they had never met before – after seeing her in a drunken state outside the home as they drove around the city.

Hussnain Ahmed and Omar Ali, both 24 and from Longsight, were each sentenced to 11 years' prison at Manchester Crown Court yesterday.

They were found guilty of raping the girl in June last year after a trial.

The court heard the pair persuaded their victim to get into their car by telling her they were just going for a drive. Fearing she would be dragged in if she did say 'yes', the girl agreed.

Hussnain, of Duncan Road, and Ali, of Sunnybank Road, ignored her pleas to return her to her home and - after taking her mobile phone off her – they drove her to the Cheshire countryside.

The girl fell unconscious inside the car due to her intoxicated state, but when she awoke she found herself in a state of undress.

After the attack, she was dropped off some distance from her care home and walked back. She immediately told staff she did not feel well and the police were called.

Several days later, the girl saw Ali - who gave her the mobile phone back. Stored in the memory were both Ali and Ahmed's numbers.

The victim gave the phone to police and the pair were arrested. Forensic tests later established both Ali and Ahmed's had raped the girl.

Det Sgt Adam Cronshaw, of Greater Manchester Police, said: "Not only did Ali and Ahmed rape a defenceless young girl, but it is clear they exploited the fact she was from a care home, intoxicated and vulnerable.

"It is not known why Ali gave her phone back at this chance meeting but clearly they did not expect the girl to find the courage to tell police she had be raped.

"During interviews at the police station, Ahmed initially denied any sexual contact with the young girl whilst Ali made no comment. Later, when confronted with the forensic evidence Ahmed changed his story, attempting to claim she consented.

"Just because a child does not live with their parents, it does not mean no one cares and it does not mean they should be subject to the sort of sexual exploitation by the likes of Ali and Ahmed just for their own gratification.

"The jury saw through the lies they spun and convicted them of rape."

-----------------------

How long are the COWARDLY BRITISH MEN going to allow this ACT OF WAR to carry on without some sort of reprisal ?

The Asian Muslim community don't seem to be worried about commiting these offences as we can see with our own eyes that these attacks are by the Asian Muslim community are escalating.

The Police are unwilling to POLICE the Asian Muslim community (follow link for an example - http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/crime/s/1421374_van-passenger-grabbed-female-passer-by-in-oldham-abduction-attempt) ,which is why these perverts are continually commiting atrocities on vulnerable WHITE BRITISH GIRLS to the extent that they are gang raping BRITAINS most vunerable INDIGENOUS FEMALES with virtual immunity.

We are at WAR with ISLAM so when do we fight back and POLICE OUR STREETS which the real police have abandoned ?

LISA NANDY - LIKES TO HAVE HER PHOTO TAKEN FOR HER CONSTITUENTS.

I wonder when Luscious Lisa holds her surgeries ?
I think my blood pressure's going up ;)

STEPHEN LAWRENCE - BLACK POWER

Unedited version of the BLACK POWER salute the Media tries so hard to hide.

But who's KRISS DONALD ?






http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald

The victim of a true RACIST murder.

LEGAL MACHINATIONS OF RACISM

So now the PC people are getting what they wanted, a retrial of the alleged killers of the black power activist Stephen Lawrence,"the black teenager who was murdered"
Why is his skin colour always mentioned? Is that not racist?

Would the law have been changed if the victim was white? I doubt it.


They had been acquitted before but a special new law was brought in to get them and sent the double jeapordy law which has served us well for centuries to the bin.

Now I do not condone violence let alone murder, but has there ever been a case when the law has been changed on the result of an acquittal or a new definition labelling an institution, the police as "institutionally racist"
The law has since been changed to disadvantage the true Brits, the inheritors of our islands in the interests of politicl correctness.

Yes these people may have been thugs, I don't know and neither does anybody else but is there evidence that they were racist?
If there was does that make any killing worse?

Will these two get a fair trial?
Why in the age of superinjunctions have they been mentioned? Double standards?
They have been assumed by the media already to be guilty before the trial, even though they were acquitted previously.

Why do the killings of black people by whites warrant more concern than vice versa?
Why was the torture and murder of Kris Donald not given more publicity?

Lawrence's parents have made a good living out of this case. I can understand their sorrow at the loss of their son but why does a white kid's death not matter as much?
Justice should be equal irrespective of colour and if these two accused are found guilty they should face the consequences, but I fear a stich up to satisfy the corrupt PC elite.

Beneath all this is a seething mass of disposessed British kids, increasingly sidelined who, because they are not free to express their opinions say nothing.

The sentiments are still there and someday they will erupt, possibly in a civil war.
The EDL are a portent for the future.

I do not agree with their tactics but sympathise with their views. I prefer taking our country back by means of the ballot box, but if we British are continually put at a disadvantage in OUR COUNTRY by the machinations of a corrupt liberal globalist "elite" someday the pot will boil over.

That is why I am as yet a member of the BNP.

Destroy our party and democratic voice and you will have civil war.
I don't want that but it will surely come if the denial of our rights and freedoms continue.

BE WARNED!

WHAT REALLY HAPPEND AT OSAMAS BURIAL

Ooops !

MOHAMMEDANS

It might have appeared to any man watching affairs in the earlier
years of the seventh century_say from 600 to 630_that only one great main
assault having been made against the Church, Arianism and its derivatives,
that assault having been repelled and the Faith having won its victory, it
was now secure for an indefinite time.

        Christendom would have to fight for its life, of course, against
outward unchristian things, that is, against Paganism. The nature
worshippers of the high Persian civilization to the east would attack us
in arms and try to overwhelm us. The savage paganism of barbaric tribes,
Scandinavian, German, Slav and Mongol, in the north and centre of Europe
would also attack Christendom and try to destroy it. The populations
subject to Byzantium would continue to parade heretical views as a label
for their grievances. But the main effort of heresy, at least, had
failed_so it seemed. Its object, the undoing of a united Catholic
civilization, had been missed. The rise of no major heresy need henceforth
be feared, still less the consequent disruption of Christendom.

        By A.D. 630 all Gaul had long been Catholic.  The last of the
Arian generals and their garrisons in Italy and Spain had become orthodox.
The Arian generals and garrisons of Northern Africa had been conquered by
the orthodox armies of the Emperor.

        It was just at this moment, a moment of apparently universal and
permanent Catholicism, that there fell an unexpected blow of overwhelming
magnitude and force. Islam arose_quite suddenly.  It came out of the
desert and overwhelmed half our civilization.

Go and read it all - it was written in 1937, so our elites cannot say "We didn't

know the nature of what we were letting in" 

http://www.ewtn.com/library/homelibr/heresy4.txt 

Morg

. 

HOOK

A seaman meets a pirate penguin in a bar, and talk turns to their adventures on the sea. The seaman notes that the penguin has a peg-leg, a hook, and an eye patch.

The seaman asks, "So, how did you end up with the peg-leg?" The penguin replies, "We were in a storm at sea, and I was swept overboard into a school of sharks. Just as my men were pulling me out, a shark bit my leg off."

"Wow!" said the seaman. "What about your hook"? "Well", replied the penguin, "We were boarding an enemy ship and were battling the other sailors with swords. One of the enemy cut my hand off."

"Incredible!" remarked the seaman. "How did you get the eye patch"? "A seagull dropping fell into my eye," replied pengy.

"You lost your eye to a seagull dropping?," the sailor asked incredulously. "Well," said pingu, "it was my first day with the new hook"

http://tiomarvo.blogspot.com/2011/05/hook.html

Morg
.

Lord Ahmed has commited an ACT' of TERRORISM

Lord Ahmed threatens Parliament into submission

"Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is, after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of their function in the legislature.

But no sooner had the unsuspecting baroness sent out her invitations, Lord Ahmed raised hell. It is reported that he ‘threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organising the event to court’.

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/01/lord-ahmed-threatens-parliament-into.html

------------------------------

After checking out something out about the CENSUS I came across a little snippet of Information regarding TERRORISM -

Definitions:

Under the Terrorism Act 2000:

“1 Terrorism: interpretation.

(1) In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where—

(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the government [For an international governmental organisation] or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and

(c) the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious [racial] or ideological cause.”

Under the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008:

“Meaning of “ancillary offence”

(1) In this Act “ancillary offence”, in relation to an offence, means any of the following—

(a) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of the offence (or, in Scotland, being art and part in the commission of the offence);

(b) an offence under Part 2 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (c. 27) (encouraging or assisting crime) in relation to the offence (or, in Scotland, inciting a person to commit the offence)”

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2011/02/22/2011-census-rebellion/

As you can see Lord Ahmed has committed offences under the TERRORISM ACT 2000.
And bragged about it in a Pakistani National Newspaper.
So, WHY is he not in Prison, as according to the Anti-Terrorism Act he has been caught redhanded.

Is it one law for us Indigenous British and another for the UNLAWFUL LORD (1689 BILL OF RIGHTS) Ahmed ?
A man who has no right to sit in the House of Lords or Parliament but is there all the same. Making Laws against the INDIGENOUS population.
Don't forget his Conviction and Jail term for killing a another person through using his mobile phone whilst driving

Throw this man in JAIL and those who have broken the ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS by allowing him or any other Foreigner to stand for Election to his Local Council and to stand for Election to Parliament.

When do we say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ?