This article was written in America, and is talking specifically about America. However, it generalises right across the world (the reference in it to "The Dead Isle" is a reference to Britain. The owner of this website, Lawrence Auster, looks at events in Britain and considers that apart from a few sparks of life - such as people like us - Britain as a culture is dead, and it saddens him. This site published the story of our difficulties getting our election advertising into the local papers, here in Wigan).
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010904.html
Read it. All of it, including comments. It is dull, dry and 'academic' - but you will learn from it.
Like me you will find the argument put forward to be compelling. Then, bearing that argument in mind, consider the lives and lifestyles of our elite groups: our politicians, our media people, our academics our business leaders ... and wonder no more about where these suicidal notions of multiculturalism and political correctness come from, and why those notions are so vehemently defended to the point of creating oppressive laws to defend them - and hiring oppressive people to enforce those laws (you there Elliot?). Wonder no more why they support mass immigration from all over the world - they all live at the clean end of the stick. The only way they will change their minds is if they have to live at the dirty end of the stick like the rest of us - and dirty in the way it is now, not the way it was thirty years ago when they did live at what was then the dirty end of the stick ... but it was a cleaner dirty.
Wonder no more why our way of life and our children's future are being flushed away.
Sunday, 29 June 2008
Friday, 27 June 2008
DON'T YOU WISH YOU HAD WRITTEN THIS?
Subject: Passport Application
Dear Minister,
I'm in the process of renewing my passport but I am a total loss to understand or believe the hoops I am being asked to jump through.
How is it that Bert Smith of T.V. Rentals Basingstoke has my address and telephone number and knows that I bought a satellite dish from them back in 1994, and yet, the Government is still asking me where I was born and on what date?
How come that nice West African immigrant chappy who comes round every Thursday night with his DVD rentals van can tell me every film or video I have had out since he started his business up eleven years ago, yet you still want me to remind you of my last three jobs, two of which were with contractors working for the government?
How come the T.V. detector van can tell if my T.V. is on, what channel I am watching and whether I have paid my licence or not, and yet if I win the government run lottery they have no idea I have won or where I am and will keep the bloody money to themselves if I fail to claim in good time.
Do you people do this by hand?
You have my birth date on numerous files you hold on me, including the one with all the income tax forms I've filed for the past 30-odd years. It's on my health insurance card, my driver's licence, on the last four passports I've had, on all those stupid customs declaration forms I've had to fill out before being allowed off the planes and boats over the last 30 years, and all those insufferable census forms that are done every ten years and the electoral registration forms I have to complete, by law, every time our lords and masters are up for re-election.
Would somebody please take note, once and for all, I was born in Maidenhead on the 4th of March 1957, my mother's name is Mary, her maiden name was Reynolds, my father's name is Robert, and I'd be absolutely astounded if that ever changed between now and the day I die!
I apologise Minister. I'm obviously not myself this morning. But between you and me, I have simply had enough! You mail the application to my house, then you ask me for my address. What is going on? Do you have a gang of Neanderthals working there? Look at my damn picture. Do I look like Bin Laden? I don't want to activate the Fifth Reich for God's sake! I just want to go and park my weary backside on a sunny, sandy beach for a couple of week's well-earned rest away from all this crap.
Well, I have to go now, because I have to go to back to Salisbury and get another copy of my birth certificate because you lost the last one. AND to the tune of 60 quid! What a racket THAT is!! Would it be so complicated to have all the services in the same spot to assist in the issuance of a new passport the same day? But nooooo, that'd be too damn easy and maybe make sense. You'd rather have us running all over the place like chickens with our heads cut off, then find some tosser to confirm that it's really me on the goddamn picture - you know... the one where we're not allowed to smile in in case we look as if we are enjoying the process!
Hey, you know why we can't smile? 'Cause we're totally jacked off!
I served in the armed forces for more than 25 years including over ten years at the Ministry of Defence in London. I have had security clearances which allowed me to sit in the Cabinet Office, five seats away from the Prime Minister while he was being briefed on the first Gulf War and I have been doing volunteer work for the British Red Cross ever since I left the Services. However, I have to get someone "important" to verify who I am -- you know, someone like my doctor...
who, before he got his medical degree 6 months ago WAS LIVING IN PAKISTAN...
Yours sincerely,
An Irate British Citizen.
Monday, 23 June 2008
CONGRATULATIONS!
DO TAKE TIME TO READ THIS..IT MAKES YOU STOP AND THINK.
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL THE KIDS WHO WERE BORN IN THE 1940's, 50's, 60's 70's
First, we survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they carried us. They took aspirin, ate blue cheese dressing, tuna from a tin, and didn't get tested for diabetes. Then after that trauma, our baby cots were covered with bright coloured lead-based paints.
We had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets - not to mention, the risks we took hitchhiking.
As children, we would ride in cars with no seat belts or air bags.
Riding in the back of a van - loose - was always exciting and great fun.
We drank water from the garden hose or tap and NOT from a bottle.
We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle or can and NO ONE actually died from this.
We ate cakes, white bread and real butter and drank cordial with sugar in it, but we weren't overweight because......
WE WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING!!
We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the streetlights came on.
No one was able to reach us all day. And we were O.K.
We would spend hours building our go-carts out of scraps and then ride down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. After running into the bushes a few times, we learned to solve the problem .
We did not have Playstations, Nintendos, X-boxes, No video games at all, No 99 channels,No Pay-TV, No cable, No DVD movies or surround sound.
It's crazy! We even had ... No mobile phones, No text messaging, No personal computers, No Internet or Internet chat rooms..........
WE HAD FRIENDS and we went outside and found them!
We fell out of trees, got cut, broke bones and teeth and there were no lawsuits from these accidents.
We played with worms and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us forever.
Made up games with sticks and tennis balls and although we were told it would happen, we didn't poke out anyone's eye.
We rode bikes or walked to a friend's house and knocked on the door or rang the bell, or just yelled for them!
Local teams had tryouts and not everyone made the team. Those who didn't had to learn to deal with disappointment. Imagine that!!
The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke the law was unheard of. They actually sided with the law!
This generation has produced some of the best risk-takers, problem solvers and inventors ever!
The past 50 years have been an explosion of innovation and new ideas.
We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned how to deal with it all!
And YOU are one of them!
CONGRATULATIONS!
You might want to share this with others who have had the good luck to grow up as kids before the lawyers and the government regulated our lives for our own good.
And while you are at it, forward this to your kids so they will know how brave their parents were.
Kind of makes you want to run through the house with your eyes shut holding a pair of scissors, doesn't it?!
WE COULD ALSO ADD TO IT 'AND I CAN SPELL PROPERLY TOO'
PS -The BIG type is because at your age, your eyes are buggered....
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL THE KIDS WHO WERE BORN IN THE 1940's, 50's, 60's 70's
First, we survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they carried us. They took aspirin, ate blue cheese dressing, tuna from a tin, and didn't get tested for diabetes. Then after that trauma, our baby cots were covered with bright coloured lead-based paints.
We had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets - not to mention, the risks we took hitchhiking.
As children, we would ride in cars with no seat belts or air bags.
Riding in the back of a van - loose - was always exciting and great fun.
We drank water from the garden hose or tap and NOT from a bottle.
We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle or can and NO ONE actually died from this.
We ate cakes, white bread and real butter and drank cordial with sugar in it, but we weren't overweight because......
WE WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING!!
We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the streetlights came on.
No one was able to reach us all day. And we were O.K.
We would spend hours building our go-carts out of scraps and then ride down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. After running into the bushes a few times, we learned to solve the problem .
We did not have Playstations, Nintendos, X-boxes, No video games at all, No 99 channels,No Pay-TV, No cable, No DVD movies or surround sound.
It's crazy! We even had ... No mobile phones, No text messaging, No personal computers, No Internet or Internet chat rooms..........
WE HAD FRIENDS and we went outside and found them!
We fell out of trees, got cut, broke bones and teeth and there were no lawsuits from these accidents.
We played with worms and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us forever.
Made up games with sticks and tennis balls and although we were told it would happen, we didn't poke out anyone's eye.
We rode bikes or walked to a friend's house and knocked on the door or rang the bell, or just yelled for them!
Local teams had tryouts and not everyone made the team. Those who didn't had to learn to deal with disappointment. Imagine that!!
The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke the law was unheard of. They actually sided with the law!
This generation has produced some of the best risk-takers, problem solvers and inventors ever!
The past 50 years have been an explosion of innovation and new ideas.
We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned how to deal with it all!
And YOU are one of them!
CONGRATULATIONS!
You might want to share this with others who have had the good luck to grow up as kids before the lawyers and the government regulated our lives for our own good.
And while you are at it, forward this to your kids so they will know how brave their parents were.
Kind of makes you want to run through the house with your eyes shut holding a pair of scissors, doesn't it?!
WE COULD ALSO ADD TO IT 'AND I CAN SPELL PROPERLY TOO'
PS -The BIG type is because at your age, your eyes are buggered....
Saturday, 21 June 2008
E.U. WANTS TO CONTROL BLOGGING
The European Parliament - such as it is - is currently discussing introducing controls on the web in general, and blogging in particular.
----------------------------------------------------------
" Weblogs and other new on-line media pose new challenges, say MEPs. The growth of commercial media outlets for user-generated content, such as photos and videos, used without paying a fee, raises problems of ethics and privacy, and puts journalists and other media professionals under pressure, they say. "
[ ... ]
" ...the blogosphere has so far been a haven of good intentions and relatively honest dealing. However, with blogs becoming commonplace, less principled people will want to use them".
[ ...]
" ...we do not see bloggers as a threat. They are in position, however, to considerably pollute cyberspace. We already have too much spam, misinformation and malicious intent in cyberspace". She added, "I think the public is still very trusting towards blogs, it is still seen as sincere. And it should remain sincere. For that we need a quality mark, a disclosure of who is really writing and why. "
[ ... ]
" German Liberal Jorgo Chatzimarkakis acted as advisor for the Economic and Monetary committee. He told us that "bloggers cannot automatically be considered a threat, but imagine pressure groups, professional interests or any other groups using blogs to pass on their message. Blogs are powerful tools, they can represent an advance form of lobbyism, which in turn can be seen as a threat". He said "any blogger representing or expressing more than their personal view should be affected by this report."
Tell us what you think?
... We plan to publish a cross-section of opinion. "
web-editor-en@europarl.europa.eu
http://tinyurl.com/44szux
--------------------------------------------------------
I have already emailed and told them what I think. I don't think they'll be publishing what I said in their " ...cross-section of opinion." Here it is, word for word:
Sir
You really don't quite understand this "free speech" business do you. I don't need a "quality mark" - I get my quality mark automatically from my readers. I definitely don't need one from you. You are not my betters you know - I don't have any betters. I have my peers, and that will do just fine, thank you.
As for "misinformation and malicious intent". Well if I misinform, you can be damned sure plenty of people will let me and the rest of the world know about it - that's how blogging works, didn't you know.
Malicious intent? Well I suppose you might have a point there - everyone who reads me knows I have nothing but malice for Islam and want its practitioners gone from my country and continent. I also have a bit of a downer on immigrants in general. I'm quite happy with having a bit of the world where I and people like me can say: 'This is our little patch of the Earth. Here we make the law and we make it to suit the way we like to live. If other people don't like and respect that, then they can just shove off back to whichever patch of the Earth they came from - back to where they can make their own laws.'
I also have a serious downer on the EU (NOT the same thing as 'other Europeans') and will do all I can to destroy it.
Any controls you try to introduce will fail. We will find technical workarounds to nullify such controls and just carry on as if you don't exist. And you aren't clever enough to stop us.
Morgan
PS My real name - I'm not afraid of you, you bastards.
---------------------------------------------------------------
I have already told them what I think. Please feel free to do the same, to the email address given above. Might be a good idea to not let your anger get the better of you though ... unlike me.
----------------------------------------------------------
" Weblogs and other new on-line media pose new challenges, say MEPs. The growth of commercial media outlets for user-generated content, such as photos and videos, used without paying a fee, raises problems of ethics and privacy, and puts journalists and other media professionals under pressure, they say. "
[ ... ]
" ...the blogosphere has so far been a haven of good intentions and relatively honest dealing. However, with blogs becoming commonplace, less principled people will want to use them".
[ ...]
" ...we do not see bloggers as a threat. They are in position, however, to considerably pollute cyberspace. We already have too much spam, misinformation and malicious intent in cyberspace". She added, "I think the public is still very trusting towards blogs, it is still seen as sincere. And it should remain sincere. For that we need a quality mark, a disclosure of who is really writing and why. "
[ ... ]
" German Liberal Jorgo Chatzimarkakis acted as advisor for the Economic and Monetary committee. He told us that "bloggers cannot automatically be considered a threat, but imagine pressure groups, professional interests or any other groups using blogs to pass on their message. Blogs are powerful tools, they can represent an advance form of lobbyism, which in turn can be seen as a threat". He said "any blogger representing or expressing more than their personal view should be affected by this report."
Tell us what you think?
... We plan to publish a cross-section of opinion. "
web-editor-en@europarl.europa.eu
http://tinyurl.com/44szux
--------------------------------------------------------
I have already emailed and told them what I think. I don't think they'll be publishing what I said in their " ...cross-section of opinion." Here it is, word for word:
Sir
You really don't quite understand this "free speech" business do you. I don't need a "quality mark" - I get my quality mark automatically from my readers. I definitely don't need one from you. You are not my betters you know - I don't have any betters. I have my peers, and that will do just fine, thank you.
As for "misinformation and malicious intent". Well if I misinform, you can be damned sure plenty of people will let me and the rest of the world know about it - that's how blogging works, didn't you know.
Malicious intent? Well I suppose you might have a point there - everyone who reads me knows I have nothing but malice for Islam and want its practitioners gone from my country and continent. I also have a bit of a downer on immigrants in general. I'm quite happy with having a bit of the world where I and people like me can say: 'This is our little patch of the Earth. Here we make the law and we make it to suit the way we like to live. If other people don't like and respect that, then they can just shove off back to whichever patch of the Earth they came from - back to where they can make their own laws.'
I also have a serious downer on the EU (NOT the same thing as 'other Europeans') and will do all I can to destroy it.
Any controls you try to introduce will fail. We will find technical workarounds to nullify such controls and just carry on as if you don't exist. And you aren't clever enough to stop us.
Morgan
PS My real name - I'm not afraid of you, you bastards.
---------------------------------------------------------------
I have already told them what I think. Please feel free to do the same, to the email address given above. Might be a good idea to not let your anger get the better of you though ... unlike me.
Monday, 16 June 2008
COMMENT SENT TO NEW EUROPE MAGAZINE
I've just been to "New Europe" web magazine
http://www.neurope.eu/articles/87836.php
I submitted the following comment in response to the article. Let's see if they publish it.
Or if perhaps they send some heavies around to lock me up for 42 days ...
Comment:
“The referendum inIreland has demonstrated that direct democracy (by way of referendum)cannot ensure the progress of the European process.The security, liberty and prosperity of hundreds of millions ofEuropean citizens ask for complex leadership actions, whichcannot be appreciated by heterogeneous populations, from thepoint of view of the information level and the education one.European integration is a process that must be conducted politicallyby the elected representatives of the European citizens.”
The arrogance on display here is breathtaking. We, the people of Europe are being told that we are too stupid to vote on these matters, and we should just leave it to our betters. Who do you people think you are? And what part of "No" are you yourselves too stupid to understand?
I've heard it said that 1% of the population of Europe should not be allowed to prevent the other 99% from having their way by saying "no". The question I would like to see answered - and not in political weasel-talk - is how many of the 99% voted "yes"?
I saw the fragrant Margot a couple of nights back saying something like "We have to understand what the Irish didn't like about the treaty". Well here and now, and for free, I can tell her exactly what the Irish didn't like about it: they didn't like ANY of it, and they didn't trust ANY of it. Exactly the same as they don't like ANY of you, and they don't trust ANY of you. Exactly the same as the majority in all 27 EU countries ... if you only had the courage to put it to the test.
You are riding for a hard fall.
http://www.neurope.eu/articles/87836.php
I submitted the following comment in response to the article. Let's see if they publish it.
Or if perhaps they send some heavies around to lock me up for 42 days ...
Comment:
“The referendum inIreland has demonstrated that direct democracy (by way of referendum)cannot ensure the progress of the European process.The security, liberty and prosperity of hundreds of millions ofEuropean citizens ask for complex leadership actions, whichcannot be appreciated by heterogeneous populations, from thepoint of view of the information level and the education one.European integration is a process that must be conducted politicallyby the elected representatives of the European citizens.”
The arrogance on display here is breathtaking. We, the people of Europe are being told that we are too stupid to vote on these matters, and we should just leave it to our betters. Who do you people think you are? And what part of "No" are you yourselves too stupid to understand?
I've heard it said that 1% of the population of Europe should not be allowed to prevent the other 99% from having their way by saying "no". The question I would like to see answered - and not in political weasel-talk - is how many of the 99% voted "yes"?
I saw the fragrant Margot a couple of nights back saying something like "We have to understand what the Irish didn't like about the treaty". Well here and now, and for free, I can tell her exactly what the Irish didn't like about it: they didn't like ANY of it, and they didn't trust ANY of it. Exactly the same as they don't like ANY of you, and they don't trust ANY of you. Exactly the same as the majority in all 27 EU countries ... if you only had the courage to put it to the test.
You are riding for a hard fall.
EUROPEAN POLITICIANS THINK EUROPEAN PEOPLE ARE TOO STUPID TO VOTE.
Really, they do, and now they're even saying it:
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2008/6/16/3747346.html
Ian Parker-Joseph is a libertarian, and as such a political opponent of the BNP. That doesn't mean he doesn't talk good sense most of the time.
Also follow the internal links within the Parker-Joseph post. Interesting and informative.
As he says, what bit of "NO!" don't they understand.
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2008/6/16/3747346.html
Ian Parker-Joseph is a libertarian, and as such a political opponent of the BNP. That doesn't mean he doesn't talk good sense most of the time.
Also follow the internal links within the Parker-Joseph post. Interesting and informative.
As he says, what bit of "NO!" don't they understand.
Friday, 13 June 2008
SUPERMARKETS DESTROYING OUR WAY OF LIFE
People all over the country are dismayed at the number of post offices closing. It seems the Post Office itself is encouraging them to close by the rules they impose.
Most people do not realise that stamps can be bought cheaper at supermarkets such as Costco than the postmasters can buy them. Indeed the postmasters are forbidden to buy their supplies from supermarkets and this puts them at a competitive disadvantage with the large stores.
If post offices keep closing , soon the only place to buy stamps and other postal services will be in supermarkets thus destroying village life and creating more traffic and inconvenience for people.
The post offices could be saved by the simple expedient of making postal services only available from them and banning these services from supermarkets.
Could it be that big donations from big business to the major parties is influencing this policy or is it the EU?
Either way it is becoming another nail in the coffin of village life and customer convenience and another instance of government ignoring the will of the people.
Supermarkets are also responsible for the sale of cheap alcohol, often as a loss leader which is the cause of much of the teenage drinking. Meanwhile pubs are closing, unable to compete with this cheap supermarket booze, especially with the high business rates they have to pay. The smoking ban was put in place to further disadvantage the position of the pub at the centre of village life.It would have been simple to have smoking and non smoking pubs so people could choose where they went.(the health argument does not wash as shown by the lax policies on drugs)
A way to counter this would be to increase massively the business rates of supermarkets selling alcohol while exempting pubs from these rates. This of course will never happen as the profits and influence of the big companies are too influential to the government.
So communities are dying and will continue to do so, with the attendant social problems, all in the interests of greed and I think the deliberate government policy of destroying the British way of life and replacing it with their version of what life in this country should be,--an amorphous,obedient, disjointed spied upon multicultural hell.
The sooner we get a government which puts the interests and desires of the BRITISH people the better.
Most people do not realise that stamps can be bought cheaper at supermarkets such as Costco than the postmasters can buy them. Indeed the postmasters are forbidden to buy their supplies from supermarkets and this puts them at a competitive disadvantage with the large stores.
If post offices keep closing , soon the only place to buy stamps and other postal services will be in supermarkets thus destroying village life and creating more traffic and inconvenience for people.
The post offices could be saved by the simple expedient of making postal services only available from them and banning these services from supermarkets.
Could it be that big donations from big business to the major parties is influencing this policy or is it the EU?
Either way it is becoming another nail in the coffin of village life and customer convenience and another instance of government ignoring the will of the people.
Supermarkets are also responsible for the sale of cheap alcohol, often as a loss leader which is the cause of much of the teenage drinking. Meanwhile pubs are closing, unable to compete with this cheap supermarket booze, especially with the high business rates they have to pay. The smoking ban was put in place to further disadvantage the position of the pub at the centre of village life.It would have been simple to have smoking and non smoking pubs so people could choose where they went.(the health argument does not wash as shown by the lax policies on drugs)
A way to counter this would be to increase massively the business rates of supermarkets selling alcohol while exempting pubs from these rates. This of course will never happen as the profits and influence of the big companies are too influential to the government.
So communities are dying and will continue to do so, with the attendant social problems, all in the interests of greed and I think the deliberate government policy of destroying the British way of life and replacing it with their version of what life in this country should be,--an amorphous,obedient, disjointed spied upon multicultural hell.
The sooner we get a government which puts the interests and desires of the BRITISH people the better.
Tuesday, 10 June 2008
WHEN YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENT--LIE.
In today's Times is a report of a woman who is fearful of this year's RWB festival. It is said that residents fear clashes as the police try to prevent "anti fascists" preventing the festival. These yobs belong to a group which believes it right to forcibly stop a peaceful festival on private ground because they disagree with our views. Now I might be wrong but I always thought that violence to those with whom you disagree is Fascism.
The local village has a large BNP following and has councillors so I can't see that the village is trying to avoid our presence, indeed the field is owned by a BNP councillor.
A nearby woman weeps (aww) that people had St George's flags and she heard laughing (how awful, happiness not allowed) and that most of the attendees had rottweilers and were playing Nazi songs. She obviously must know more about these songs than I do as I never heard any last year and would not recognise them if I did hear them. Also the field was not populated with fierce dogs. I do not particularly like dogs and I was not intimidated. As for noise we were prevented from camping near to the stupid cow's premises in case we disturbed her "beauty" sleep.
There are few houses near the field and thus few residents to be disturbed.
In the area I believe is held a motorcycle rally which does not seem to bother these sensitive residents in spite of the greater numbers and the fast bikes on the roads.
The occasion is so safe I hope to take my young grandchildren this year. I can allow them to play and wander round in the certain knowledge that they will be safe, unlike in most areas of our enriched country.
This year with a larger field we will be able to keep even further away from the miserable sods.
The event was monitored by the police last year who reported no trouble. They do say that entry must be restricted to BNP members and their friends. So, that is what the rules for entry are in any case to keep out the fascist trash who want to disrupt the festival. Yes people can join the Party on payment of the subscription as they can any other party.
Compare this with the Notting Hill Carnival in London so beloved by the loony Left which is plagued by theft, drugs,assaults and sometimes even death.
The real truth is towards the end of the article when it states that anti BNP supporters were persuaded to stay away last year but they might turn up this time and cause trouble. So that's it. It's not that we cause trouble, but that we must be prevented from having our peaceful get together in case some "anti fascists" disrupt it.
It just shows who the fascists are and that when there is trouble it is not caused by the BNP.
The article also shows blatant bias and distortion of the facts but that is to be expected from a paper owned by a foreigner who does not have this country's interest at heart and is using the great unwashed rabble to promote his anti British agenda.
The local village has a large BNP following and has councillors so I can't see that the village is trying to avoid our presence, indeed the field is owned by a BNP councillor.
A nearby woman weeps (aww) that people had St George's flags and she heard laughing (how awful, happiness not allowed) and that most of the attendees had rottweilers and were playing Nazi songs. She obviously must know more about these songs than I do as I never heard any last year and would not recognise them if I did hear them. Also the field was not populated with fierce dogs. I do not particularly like dogs and I was not intimidated. As for noise we were prevented from camping near to the stupid cow's premises in case we disturbed her "beauty" sleep.
There are few houses near the field and thus few residents to be disturbed.
In the area I believe is held a motorcycle rally which does not seem to bother these sensitive residents in spite of the greater numbers and the fast bikes on the roads.
The occasion is so safe I hope to take my young grandchildren this year. I can allow them to play and wander round in the certain knowledge that they will be safe, unlike in most areas of our enriched country.
This year with a larger field we will be able to keep even further away from the miserable sods.
The event was monitored by the police last year who reported no trouble. They do say that entry must be restricted to BNP members and their friends. So, that is what the rules for entry are in any case to keep out the fascist trash who want to disrupt the festival. Yes people can join the Party on payment of the subscription as they can any other party.
Compare this with the Notting Hill Carnival in London so beloved by the loony Left which is plagued by theft, drugs,assaults and sometimes even death.
The real truth is towards the end of the article when it states that anti BNP supporters were persuaded to stay away last year but they might turn up this time and cause trouble. So that's it. It's not that we cause trouble, but that we must be prevented from having our peaceful get together in case some "anti fascists" disrupt it.
It just shows who the fascists are and that when there is trouble it is not caused by the BNP.
The article also shows blatant bias and distortion of the facts but that is to be expected from a paper owned by a foreigner who does not have this country's interest at heart and is using the great unwashed rabble to promote his anti British agenda.
Thursday, 5 June 2008
" Blair will be remembered as one of the worst leaders in history. "
Why does it take a Norwegian - Robert Fjordman, again - to say this; and on a Belgian website? Why can't we say this sort of thing ourselves without the Elliot Brown's of this world stamping on us? Care to explain Elliot? Comments are open and we don't believe in censorship of fact or opinion. We are really keen on engaging in debate with you.
Fjordman:
" I will defend all Western and indeed infidel countries against Islamic Jihad, but I admit I feel especially close to Britain, not just because of the long cultural and historic ties between Scandinavia and the British Isles, but also because I appreciate the good that has come out of British culture. It makes me all the more sad to see how humiliated this great nation is today, ...
In May 2008, 18 year-old Ben Smith was stopped in a routine check. The police officer noticed an English flag on the parcel shelf and ordered him to remove it because it was "racist towards immigrants." One of the first things foreign powers usually do when they invade a country is to ban its national symbols.
[ ... ]
The British Foreign Minister Milliband stated late in 2007 that the European Union should expand to include Muslim nations in North Africa and the Middle East. The French President Sarkozy and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel confirmed this early in 2008. Since the EU involves the free movement of people across borders, European leaders are thus opening the floodgates to tens of millions of Muslims at a time when native Europeans already feel like aliens in their own cities. It's the greatest betrayal in the history of Western civilization and it has been planned for many years, ...
[ ... ]
Blair will be remembered as one of the worst leaders in history. Even Chamberlain didn't flood his country with enemies and present this as something positive. Mass immigration has been going on for decades but showed a spectacular increase under Blair's and Brown's Labour regime. The spike was so powerful that it is tempting to speculate whether the authorities had deliberately set out to dismantle their own nation.
Similar things are happening all over the Western world, not just in England or Britain, but Britain is definitely one of the worst countries, yes. I've been debating with people which country is most likely to get the first Eurabian civil war triggered by mass immigration. There are several possible candidates, but my money is on Britain, because the anger among ordinary citizens is only rivaled by the brutal political repression tactics.
[ ... ]
Even children face this kind of ideological intimidation. Codie Stott, a teenage British schoolgirl, was forced to spend hours in a police cell after she was reported by her teachers for "racism." She had objected, in the mildest possible terms, to being placed during class with a group of South Asian immigrants who talked among themselves in a language she didn't understand. For this, she was dragged to the local police station and had her fingerprints and photograph taken. ...
Meanwhile, the UK is being brought to its knees in an epidemic of violent crime and white native girls get raped by immigrants in spectacular numbers, just like all over Western Europe. [ also see Tottenhamlad link below ]
[ ... ]
... English, not Arabic, Chinese or Mayan, became the global lingua franca. What's so special about those rainy and foggy islands?
[ ... ]
... The reason why English became the dominant language is because Britain and its offspring enjoyed great political liberty even by Western standards, and a corresponding economic dynamism.
Probably no empire in world history has been more benevolent than the British Empire, yet a report from February 2008 recommended that patriotism should be avoided in school lessons because British history is "morally ambiguous." I suppose Islamic history isn't, with almost 1400 years of brutal Jihad warfare on several continents?
I'm sure the British are being told that the ongoing mass immigration is a result of their "colonial history." I live in a country with no colonial history, yet we are still subject to mass immigration. We are also being told that we should allow Pakistani or Nigerian flags to celebrate our Constitution Day because this will be "good for integration." This has nothing to do with colonialism. So what does it have to do with?
[ ... ]
Our enemies, internal and external, want to destroy the Western world because we represent liberty, and they want to destroy Britain in particular because it gave birth to the most powerful pro-liberty culture within the Western tradition. I hope the British can regain their strength and throw off their traitor class, but they need to do so soon. We cannot allow the greatest nation in human history to be destroyed by the planet's most barbaric cultures.
The British people, like their Dutch, German, Italian, Spanish and Danish counterparts, have every right to desire self-determination and self-preservation, and limit or even completely halt immigration as they see fit to ensure this. Those who say otherwise are evil, and need to be exposed as such. The Western world is under attack by a global Islamic Jihad. To support continued mass immigration of Muslims in this situation should be regarded as high treason, and punished as such. "
Oh, it is and it will be Mr. Fjordman, it is and it will be. Be assured. By the way, what's the traditional punishment for treason? Can anyone tell me?
Please do take the time to go read it all. And if you want to be really well-informed, take the couple of hours it'll need to follow and read all the links too.
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3322
And while you're in the mood for reading, go read this too, and get really angry. Even if you don't go and read the above link, then you really must read this second one - for the sake of your daughters, sisters, cousins, and all your female friends and neighbours. This kind of thing hasn't yet happened here in Wigan, but given the way the immigrant population is rapidly growing, it's only a matter of time. It happens everywhere else there are large numbers of these people, and especially in their countries of origin, so what would make anyone suppose it'll be different here in Wigan? No Elliot, it's not your ridiculous "Hate and imbecility" allegations of past incest in the Wigan population that's a problem, or what you call present-day "Hate crime" (no doubt excluding your own little contribution): it's the increasing numbers of black and muslim immigrants.
http://tottenhamlad.blogspot.com/2008/03/savage-path-from-knoxville-to-tottenham.html
All British people should read all of that Tottenhamlad post. That includes you Elliot. Are you British, by the way? Real British? Welsh? English? Irish? Scots? At least European of long standing residence?
Yes Elliot, I'm challenging you to raise a "Hate Crime" case against me. Go on, do it, you P.O.S. (pick and choose as appropriate from this list of acronyms):
http://silmaril.ie/cgi-bin/uncgi/acronyms?POS
For more evidence to help you Elliot, follow my 'Contributor' link (near the top of the page, on the left-hand side) to my Reconquista blog. You may find my "Have you a daughter?" post particularly helpful. I will be updating it in 2011 after the next census. I don't expect much to have changed, though, other than the numbers being higher. I'm also working on an update to my "Muslim Terror attacks worldwide" posts. No change there either, apart from the relentless rise in numbers - contrary to what the media say.
For new readers who don't understand the Elliot references, please refer to the first few posts in the early days of this blog. All will become clear.
Morg.
Fjordman:
" I will defend all Western and indeed infidel countries against Islamic Jihad, but I admit I feel especially close to Britain, not just because of the long cultural and historic ties between Scandinavia and the British Isles, but also because I appreciate the good that has come out of British culture. It makes me all the more sad to see how humiliated this great nation is today, ...
In May 2008, 18 year-old Ben Smith was stopped in a routine check. The police officer noticed an English flag on the parcel shelf and ordered him to remove it because it was "racist towards immigrants." One of the first things foreign powers usually do when they invade a country is to ban its national symbols.
[ ... ]
The British Foreign Minister Milliband stated late in 2007 that the European Union should expand to include Muslim nations in North Africa and the Middle East. The French President Sarkozy and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel confirmed this early in 2008. Since the EU involves the free movement of people across borders, European leaders are thus opening the floodgates to tens of millions of Muslims at a time when native Europeans already feel like aliens in their own cities. It's the greatest betrayal in the history of Western civilization and it has been planned for many years, ...
[ ... ]
Blair will be remembered as one of the worst leaders in history. Even Chamberlain didn't flood his country with enemies and present this as something positive. Mass immigration has been going on for decades but showed a spectacular increase under Blair's and Brown's Labour regime. The spike was so powerful that it is tempting to speculate whether the authorities had deliberately set out to dismantle their own nation.
Similar things are happening all over the Western world, not just in England or Britain, but Britain is definitely one of the worst countries, yes. I've been debating with people which country is most likely to get the first Eurabian civil war triggered by mass immigration. There are several possible candidates, but my money is on Britain, because the anger among ordinary citizens is only rivaled by the brutal political repression tactics.
[ ... ]
Even children face this kind of ideological intimidation. Codie Stott, a teenage British schoolgirl, was forced to spend hours in a police cell after she was reported by her teachers for "racism." She had objected, in the mildest possible terms, to being placed during class with a group of South Asian immigrants who talked among themselves in a language she didn't understand. For this, she was dragged to the local police station and had her fingerprints and photograph taken. ...
Meanwhile, the UK is being brought to its knees in an epidemic of violent crime and white native girls get raped by immigrants in spectacular numbers, just like all over Western Europe. [ also see Tottenhamlad link below ]
[ ... ]
... English, not Arabic, Chinese or Mayan, became the global lingua franca. What's so special about those rainy and foggy islands?
[ ... ]
... The reason why English became the dominant language is because Britain and its offspring enjoyed great political liberty even by Western standards, and a corresponding economic dynamism.
Probably no empire in world history has been more benevolent than the British Empire, yet a report from February 2008 recommended that patriotism should be avoided in school lessons because British history is "morally ambiguous." I suppose Islamic history isn't, with almost 1400 years of brutal Jihad warfare on several continents?
I'm sure the British are being told that the ongoing mass immigration is a result of their "colonial history." I live in a country with no colonial history, yet we are still subject to mass immigration. We are also being told that we should allow Pakistani or Nigerian flags to celebrate our Constitution Day because this will be "good for integration." This has nothing to do with colonialism. So what does it have to do with?
[ ... ]
Our enemies, internal and external, want to destroy the Western world because we represent liberty, and they want to destroy Britain in particular because it gave birth to the most powerful pro-liberty culture within the Western tradition. I hope the British can regain their strength and throw off their traitor class, but they need to do so soon. We cannot allow the greatest nation in human history to be destroyed by the planet's most barbaric cultures.
The British people, like their Dutch, German, Italian, Spanish and Danish counterparts, have every right to desire self-determination and self-preservation, and limit or even completely halt immigration as they see fit to ensure this. Those who say otherwise are evil, and need to be exposed as such. The Western world is under attack by a global Islamic Jihad. To support continued mass immigration of Muslims in this situation should be regarded as high treason, and punished as such. "
Oh, it is and it will be Mr. Fjordman, it is and it will be. Be assured. By the way, what's the traditional punishment for treason? Can anyone tell me?
Please do take the time to go read it all. And if you want to be really well-informed, take the couple of hours it'll need to follow and read all the links too.
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3322
And while you're in the mood for reading, go read this too, and get really angry. Even if you don't go and read the above link, then you really must read this second one - for the sake of your daughters, sisters, cousins, and all your female friends and neighbours. This kind of thing hasn't yet happened here in Wigan, but given the way the immigrant population is rapidly growing, it's only a matter of time. It happens everywhere else there are large numbers of these people, and especially in their countries of origin, so what would make anyone suppose it'll be different here in Wigan? No Elliot, it's not your ridiculous "Hate and imbecility" allegations of past incest in the Wigan population that's a problem, or what you call present-day "Hate crime" (no doubt excluding your own little contribution): it's the increasing numbers of black and muslim immigrants.
http://tottenhamlad.blogspot.com/2008/03/savage-path-from-knoxville-to-tottenham.html
All British people should read all of that Tottenhamlad post. That includes you Elliot. Are you British, by the way? Real British? Welsh? English? Irish? Scots? At least European of long standing residence?
Yes Elliot, I'm challenging you to raise a "Hate Crime" case against me. Go on, do it, you P.O.S. (pick and choose as appropriate from this list of acronyms):
http://silmaril.ie/cgi-bin/uncgi/acronyms?POS
For more evidence to help you Elliot, follow my 'Contributor' link (near the top of the page, on the left-hand side) to my Reconquista blog. You may find my "Have you a daughter?" post particularly helpful. I will be updating it in 2011 after the next census. I don't expect much to have changed, though, other than the numbers being higher. I'm also working on an update to my "Muslim Terror attacks worldwide" posts. No change there either, apart from the relentless rise in numbers - contrary to what the media say.
For new readers who don't understand the Elliot references, please refer to the first few posts in the early days of this blog. All will become clear.
Morg.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)