A SQUALID FUTURE?

Tonight I watched a programme on Channel Four about the conditions in South Africa "post democracy" presented by that good British man Krishnan Gurumurthy, or something like that.

I can well understand why he was sent to report on conditions as a white man would have been in fear of his life in the shanty towns he visited.

The appalling squalour of the shanty towns he visited with rubbish, open sewers everywhere was a demonstration of typical African life.

One may wonder with what these people would have made their rudimentary shelters of if corrugated iron had not been invented by a British man in the 1820s. Perhaps they would have lived in true native ethnic style in mud huts.
Given the channel it was on, and the presenter with sympathy to the people suffering, the level of corruption and danger to the inhabitants from violent burglary was horrendous.

One woman was even afraid to go to the toilet at night (although I would think a visit in the day would have been wished to be avoided).
Possibly too many Africans about, that was the danger. I'm sure the whites would not have dared to set foot in those slums.
There was blatant corruption in the allocation of houses and profiteering by political heavyweights formerly of the "democratic ANC"

There was also a noticeable absence of men and those who were still there seemed to have done little to improve their neighbourhood.

Squalid though it was townships such as this are ubiquitous all over Africa and are shown in adverts requesting donations for help.
Cameron pledges millions of our money (not his and he has plenty) to help these people.

A question.
Could all this squalour and poverty in a wealthy country blessed by gold diamonds and coal and good land not be in some little way be the fault of their inhabitants?

Could the poverty and squalour in ALL other African countries also richly endowed with natural resources, be in a small way the fault of the inhabitants? After all many of our financial woes are blamed on the native British people.

Yes these people are poor. So were our people 100 years ago and our housing poor (I notice the slum dwellers all had mobile phones) but our streets were not covered in rubbish and we had a semblence of order and progress.

We had local councils who organised the improvement of our communities.
Our bureaucracies, although not perfect were not riven by corruption and our forefathers built a better land for their descendants.

Now areas of our large cities are receeding into crime and antisocial behaviour where knife and gun crime are on the increase. Native British people have left these areas in the process known as "white flight"
These areas in the main are populated by people of African descent who have moved here for various legitimate or other reasons. They are "celebrated" by the proponents of "diversity" as bringing a"vibrancy" to our land.

Of course the origins and ethnic make up of these new colonisers of our cities have nothing to do with increased crime levels

OR HAVE THEY? Is it in the genes?
A cursory look at the worldwide statistics would suggest so.

IS THIS THE FUTURE WHICH BECKONS OUR DESCENDANTS?

A THREE ONE WIN FOR NICK

Nick, your obsession with the forthcoming Panorama is beginning to seem pathological.
Why not let it drop and see what they say?

Your letter to the BBC on today website was a very good letter and the best response so far to whatever accusations you think they may make.

You still concentrate on financial issues and other employment matters of which most people neither know nor care about.

BUT you did land some good knockout punches at the BBC regarding their bias and general promotion of alien inhabitants of our country while excluding the views of our party who represent the indiginous inhabitants.

Why did you not do this before?
Why did you react as if you were on the ropes?

We know the BBC are lefty multiculturalists. Everybody does.

They have the power and almost a monopoly. We will never compete with them by running away. If we do that they will portray us in an even worse light and we can do little about it.
We could have used them to our advantage, but can not do that if we don't talk to them.

It is time we stopped running away and proclaimed our beliefs with pride. That way we will gain the support we are now losing.

There is a hunger in the British people for a competent movement to represent them, and we are not now providing that vehicle.

"Operation Fightback"? At present it seems like operation running away.

Stand firm Nick. Answer the questions honestly and get a competent management and policy system in place and we and the country will back you.

But the organisation and methods will have to change.

I'll give you a three one on the letter to Mark Thompson of the BBC

Keep it up.

Now Foreign nationals are to be given some of the TOP POLICE JOBS in the name of DIVERSITY

"Bernard Hogan-Howe, the new Metropolitan Commissioner, said as many as one in 10 staff at inspector rank or above could be parachuted in.

He said women and those from ethnic minorities have achieved “far more and far more quickly” in other industries and indicated they should now be targeted and fast-tracked to make senior police ranks more representative.

High-flying police officers could also be allowed to leapfrog ranks to get to the top quicker, he said.

Mr Hogan-Howe also said that he is in talks with the Home Office and Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, in a bid to protect the Met from budget cuts before next year’s Olympics.

He repeated his pledge of a “total war” on crime and warned drug dealers to expect to have their “doors put in”

The police have long been criticised for a poor representation of women and ethnic minorities, and moves to boost diversity have often fallen short of targets.

In an interview with the Police Review magazine, published today, Mr Hogan-Howe suggested proposals to shake up traditional entry levels for the police could be used to improve diversity.

They would be brought in above the rank of constable and undergo fast-track training. He said: “I think there is some option for some of the people selected at middle and senior management to come from outside.

“I might take 10 per cent who, after two to three years’ training, are up to strength, and have an open mind about whether it is at inspector rank or superintendent.”

Asked if such a move would help diversity, he added: “I think so because, if you look at certain areas of society, women and black and ethnic minorities are over-represented. If you look at graduates, there are more women than men.

“In certain industries, women and ethnic minorities have achieved far more and far more quickly than in the police.

“If we are recruiting from that pool, we will have a lot more chance of being more representative of society.”

Mr Hogan-Howe disclosed that negotiations were under way to ensure that Met numbers were not hit before the 2012 Olympics.

Police forces are facing budget cuts of up to 20 per cent over the next four years with the heaviest falling in the first two years.

He said: “We are in discussions with Boris Johnson and Kit Malthouse, of the Metropolitan Police Authority, who are talking with the Home Office to see if we can maintain our police numbers for a longer period.”"

--------------------------------

You only need a different Skin Colour, be born abroad or a non NATIVE Brit and you can be responsible for attacking the INDIGENOUS POPULATION without fear or favour.

Who represents US the INDIGENOUS ENGLISH, IRISH, SCOTTISH and WELSH ?

NO ONE

GENEROUS WITH OTHER'S MONEY

So as was predicted earlier last week Mervyn King has engaged in a bit of money printing or as he calls it Qantitive Easing, but only £70 billion, that's £1000 for every person in the country.

This of course devalues all our money.
It has he admitted devastating effects on those nearing retirement who will lose heavily in their pensions (the private sector, not the public)

I beleve this is a gross betrayal of those who have worked hard all their lives and saved as they thought for a comfortable retirement to have to experience this theft of their money and standard of living.

The bankers of course will do well out of this and will I'm sure secure their bonuses and the City will prosper, but this action will do little to help our industry and national finances, sold of by these same people.

IF IT IS SO EASY, WHY NOT PRINT A TRILLION AND PAY ALL OUR DEBTS OFF?

Cameron was waffling on about Africa and his "victory" over the tin pot dictator of a sand hole.
He put hs determined face on (as if he is playing tennis) and claimed he would bring back powers from Europe.
I'll believe that when I see it, but in my opinion he would be better for all concerned, our people, workers and pensioners but possibly not the bankers if he brought back the billions we now give to Europe.

IT'S OUR MONEY AND YOU HAVE NO MANDATE TO GIVE IT AWAY.

WE WANT IT BACK.

ONCE MORE INTO THE BREACH NICK

The increasingly worried BNP leadership again publishes a long list of questions to the BBC regarding their forthcoming exposure on next week's Panorama programme.

Excuses and panic seem to be the main topic of the official website in recent days and I am sure the producers will have a field day pointing out this anxiety which if the allegations are unfounded should not exist.
In their "wisdom" they declined to answer questions and thus gave a free rein to whatever the BBC may say.

In addition they have sunk to new depths by bringing David Hannam into their arguments who was a decent man and unlike the leadership knew the meaning of loyalty.

The BBC have no love for our nation and indeed today had a programme celebrating the increase of people of mixed race and I detest them for it.
I did not watch it as it would have annoyed me too much, but the mismanagement of their reaction to the programme is worse if anything than that of their party management.

OUR PARTY SHOULD STAND ITS GROUND not hide behind allegations of corruption in others.

The paranoia of the Party reaches all levels, even our area.
The St Helens organiser was asked to pick up some books from my house and advised to bring security with her.
What did they think I was supposed to do, attack her?
Fortunately she knew I have never been prone to violence and she came alone. In any case I could easily have handled the security man delegated to protect her, but that a violent confrontration was thought possible shows their mindset.

I have also heard that our Wigan & Leigh group has a list of people to be invited to meetings.
The list was described to me as "non rebels and non thinkers" . Thus it seems that rebels and thinkers are not welcome, which does not say much for the present management.

This list obviously includes me and many local Party stalwarts who built the group up from its former small beginnings.
It seems there is only one way to think, that of the official line and any deviation can not be tolerated and renders people asking questions of Clive Jefferson and Mike Whitby as "rebels" and "non thinkers".

Once more democracy at work.

I am no Einstein but I am sure I can hold my own with those two as I have done before and I can assure these "top" officials that far more people think as I do than agree with them,and they would be surprised who.

Never mind the group is going from strength to strength and there are plans for amalgamation with Bolton, this in stark contrast to our previous plans of splitting our group into two separate parts,such was our success.

With progress as good as this it will be unlikely that there will be a party in the NW by Christmas and a once thriving region will be reduced to a shrivelled shell, run with the usual efficiency by Whitby and Jefferson.

THE GOOD NEWS.

Many people wish to join us. The enthusiasm is there and growing and we will soon have a vehicle for the pent up frustration of the people when our movement has been cleansed of this incompetent and undemocratic leadership.

I know this as I speak regularly to people who wish to be involved but refuse to do so under the present regime.

THE OFFICIALS DON'T.

WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK.

WE WANT OUR NATIONALIST MOVEMENT BACK! and we'll get it.

MORE TORY WAFFLE

This morning David Cameron was in a quandary.
His speech to the Tory conference was to contain the advice to people to pay their credit card bills and save more.
What a fool he was to consider this and he soon realise what a mistake he had made in many aspects.
He realised that he had made a mistake and hastily amended his speech (possibly some banker friends had been to see him).

First it is easy for him, a multimillionaire to advise squeezed families to cut their debts when the pain does not affect him and that statement would look bad on him from a political point of view.

BUT the main boob he made was that if people reduced their debts his banker friends would have less money to leech from. Also the "High Street" also owned by his rich friends would suffer.
Now I don't care if the high street shops do suffer as they create few jobs and build their business on importing Chinese tat which has the advantage of boosting the shops profits and the debts the banks hold on people.

I do believe that IF POSSIBLE people should endeavour to only buy what is absolutely necessary and pay their credit bills off. This would free them from the clutches of the bankers and other usurers, but the words are IF POSSIBLE.

I do think many people buy too much new stuff,(possibly because I am of an older generation), phones, cars, furniture etc when the items they have are adequate for their use. A look in skips and recycling facilities proves this.
The idea that all this consumption creates jobs is a myth.
Ninety percent of these purchases are foreign goods, and provide no employment in this country apart from the sales assistants.

If gradually over a period of years we could rid ourselves of this consumption obsession and the associated debt we would all be just as happy and a lot more prosperous.
The banks would be poorer as would people like Philip Green who has made his billions by buying cheap foreign tat and selling it at a good profit.

Most people have clothes they never wear much of it bought on credit and it is not necessary for a decent standard of living.

We have enough to pay out for council taxes and fuel, let alone food and these are the items which DO matter.

Now we come back to Mr Cameron.

It is no good him advising thrift when he is giving billions in foreign aid, spending in foreign wars and donating to the EU.


If we, the people did not have these weights around our necks we could have lower taxes and be able to pay our credit cards off.

BUT THEN THAT WOULD NOT SUIT YOUR BANKER FRIENDS.

Thrift like charity begins at home Mr Cameron. Don't tell us you are saving when in August your government spent twelve billion more than it took in taxes.

PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH MR CAMERON.

MORE PAINC AND CROCODILE TEARS

I was never one for literature but some sayings of our great poets are sometimes apt.

The constant preoccupation with the forthcoming BBC Panorama programme featuring the financial aspects of the BNP bring to mind the saying "methinks they doth protest too much"

On the BNP website there has over the last week been a constant theme of criticism of wrong practices of the BBC of which there are many, and now today asking why do they not concentrate on the fraud of the other parties.
There have been such programmes and no doubt there will in the future be more but the questions it seems in this programme are in relation to our party's affairs.

Yes we know corruption is rife in the BBC and the other parties but the questions are being now asked of our party. Whether these other bodies are corrupt is irrelevant, but two wrongs do not make a right.
This constant attack on a programme which has not yet been broadcast would give an impartial observer the impression that the Party does have something to hide and in itself does the Party no good.

Are they so afraid of scrutiny that their only defence is to attack other parties and organisations?

Why not be open if you have nothing to hide?

The belated "obituary" of David Hannam illustrates this mindset, implying that questions asked of him hastened his untimely demise.
If so it can only be because of his having been used by the hierarchy and been obliged to cover up failings.
At one point in this "obituary" he is praised for his work and advice in financial matters and a paragraph later said to be not up to the task.
He will be used as a convenient scapegoat. he deserves better than this.

He was a decent man who was USED and any deficiencies can not justifiably be laid at his door.
The buck in any organisation stops at the top, and David was not that man, just a pawn who, if his death has been caused by this programme ,paid the price of loyalty to a hierarchy who did not deserve such loyalty, nor it seems value him.

RIP David.

Your name will be remembered unsullied unlike some who used you.