A BLUEPRINT FOR THE FUTURE?

There is a proposal in yesterday's "British National Party ideas" fo a "Think Tank" to discuss ways of going forward from here.

BTW I believe this site is excellent and would commend everybody to visit it rather than the official site as the articles cover a wider range of topics and are better thought out and written, not surprising considering the calibre of those still "on side" with Nick Griffin.

I, like many others have been wondering what we could do to improve our chances, and having dwelt on this topic have become increasingly optimistic that the prospect of a nationalist revival is possible if we do the right things.

But first we have to consider why we are where we are.

Yes I know we have been in recent weeks preoccupied by our own in party matters and conflict, but we perhaps have forgotten the momentous national and international events taking place.
I have been following these in the last two days in the papers comments section especially following the horrific murders in Norway supposedly, in that madman's idea to protect European civilisation.

The media especially the left wing papers and the BBC have endeavoured to pin this outrage on us and our party. What struck me was the overwhelming majority of the thousands of comments which expressed the fear that Europe is becoming taken over by muslim people and are thus potential supporters of ours.

So why have we not harvested that support?

The answers are that we are perceived as too extreme by voters and internally we are concentrating on the wrong things.

WE spend too much time on semantics, Civic Nationalism versus Ethno Nationalism for example.
We are all Nationalists as are many of our compatriots so we should stress that unity.
I am neither. I am an Economic Nationalist and believe all will fall into place as a result of nationalistic economic policies, but again these details are irrelevant if we are to unite as a force for good in our nation.

Most people from all parties are against further immigration so we should promote that part of our policies without bothering about the details.

When you are in a hole, first stop digging rather than discussing which spade to use.

The campaigns the party has mounted, although on serious matters are of little significance in the larger picture. Yes muslim grooming is horrific and all are agreed on this, but putting a large part of our resources into campaigns such as this gain few votes.
Similarly the incompetently run "Bring our Boys Home" petition does not differntiate us enough from other parties, nor does the halal meat campaign gain us many votes.

We should as nationalists keep our noses out of the Israel/ Palestine conflict, again, it has nothing to do with us and gains us few votes.

Inteperate comments about Jews and executing our present politicians just puts people off and invites comparison to totalitarian regimes such as the Nazis and Stalinist Communists.

These attitudes have tainted people's image of nationalism, giving the impression of nasty vindictive attitudes.

Instead we should be pointing out that countries, often nominally Communist such as China are Nationalist, and that Nationalism has been an ingredient in their success. Nationalism has been successful in Japan and other Far East countries and even Germany where people and governments support their own economies.
Indeed every successful country in the world has gained that success as a result of a nationalist ideology.

We must promote the positive aspects of Nationalism and counter the negative connotations that word brings in our society,but we must do it in a form that is not and does not look extreme but rather a unifying philosophy which protects us rather than discriminates against others.

There are many ways we could effect this.
The phone hacking scandal has not yet run its course but even now both major parties have been shown to be mired in corruption and in hock to a ruthless foreigner who has in effect taken over our government.

The incompetence of our government is daily shown and many of its most stupid actions have only been taken after consulting Murdoch, such as the war in Iraq.
Now we are bogged down in Libya, again sticking our noses where they have no business to be.

More dangerous than all the above however but swept under the table by the capitalist banking cabal is the imminent collapse of the Euro and the American Dollar.
Chickens really are coming home to roost and economic disaster looms as countries attempt to pay interest to the international bankers on money they have created out of thin air to lend at high rates of interest.This money can only be repaid by continuing to grow the economy.

Any fool can see that in a finite world growth can not continue for ever but the powers that be continue on this path to disaster as they are financed by this fraud.

While we have been preoccupied with our internal matters international events have been to some extent under our radar.

SO WHAT DO WE DO?

Well I think a "think tank" meeting for disaffected members, past and present together with other concerned people should be set up. A new party could be set up, free from the toxicity of the Griffinite BNP which could bind all the various strands of nationalism under a common banner.

WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE?

Yes I think so, and quite easily.In every area there are people who have left the party disillusioned with the leadership and others who have been expelled.There are in all areas nuclei around which we could build on the hunger for a nationalist party which is evident in the comments to papers AND WHICH WE HAVE NOT TAPPED.

WOULD WE BE TAINTED BY OUR ASSOCIATION WITH THE GRIFFINITE BNP?

No. The fact that we have left in disgust or been expelled would be a point in our favour in public perception.We could use this to our advantage portraying us as a clean honest party whose members had the courage of their convictions to leave the old one . We could show ourselves to have been the victims of a con trick to our cost and distance ourselves from the chicanery and extremism of the present party.

The leadership contest has had a cathartic effect I believe in halting our downward spiral.It has concentrated minds. It has sifted those who wish to carry on in the Griffinite mould from those who have seen the light, sometimes belatedly.

If a new clean party is formed, purged of staunch Griffinites, the members could use their past membership of the BNP as a badge of honour showing that they had seen the light and rejected factionalism, financial irregularities, incompetence and extremism.
Remember the people who supported Brons are the intellectuals in the present party.
A new party would have a ready made management team.

IT WOULD NOT COST MUCH.

We are not responsible for Griffin's debts, so we could start with a clean sheet in more ways than one.

WE OWE IT TO OUR COUNTRY.

There is a rich seam of Nationalist support out there.

WE MUST MINE IT! IT CAN BE DONE.

FOR BRITAIN'S SAKE- TAKE A SHOWER

I note with interest the estimate of our GDP published yesterday, but I am still mystified by the assumptions made in calculating it.

It states that manufacturing output went down in December,owing to the bad weather which hindered transport and geting to work. I can understand that. Output down because of the cold weather.

It also states that because of a warm April figures are also lower than expected.
Manufacturing down again of course but this drop is often nullified by other factors.

Because of the warmth ,electricity and gas consumption was down thus lowering the figures.
Now this I can not understand as I always thought the use of electricity was consumption, not production.

Does it mean that I am to blame for not taking enough showers or flushing the toilet as much? It seems so.

Am I to blame because I have not spent as much or avoided a parking ticket or fine.?
All these aspects it seems are taken into consideration when collating the figures.
Issuing tickets and box ticking are all counted.

Spending mainly on imported goods, even if distributed and sold in this country is not production it is expenditure but the way they are compiled seem to be as important as manufacturing in the statistics.

We are told by "the experts" we must save more while spending more (mainly on imported goods).

Do they know something we do not know? I doubt it. They are just incompetent at their job of running a successful economy while feathering their own nests at our expense.

It demonstrates what is wrong with our economic model by classing consumption and pointless activities as production.

Until we have a more realistic system of valuing activities we will continue our downward economic path.

The s**t will hit the fan and our party must unite and provide the answers instead of concentrating on issues with which most people agree.

BUT in an effort to help the present situation and our economy I will finish this blog, go to the bog and use a bit more electricity by having the shower I have too long delayed.

Oh, and while I do so I will leave this computer on and switch the lights on.

Hopefully I will have an even bigger electricity bill next time reflecting my contribution to our national prosperity, even though I will make myself poorer by doing so.

THE CHAIRMAN IS NOT THE PARTY

With the disappointment of yesterday's result and having had time to reflect, all people who backed Brons must be wondering "what now?"

I see Griffin says he had before the election, promised to offer the hand of friendship to those who opposed him, expecting an easy win instead of just scraping in.

He says those who remain disaffected and trouble causers will be cast aside as there is much work to be done.
Does that mean anyone who questions his already failed tactics will be expelled? If so he is reminiscent of a modern day Stalin who does not tolerate different opinions.

He talks of building power. That is the trouble. We have under his leadership lost power and influence as has been written about in the national press.
IT HAPPENED ON HIS WATCH!

He is campaigning for a referendum on EU membership. Most people want that so how are we different?
"Bring our boys Home". Most people are against foreign wars so that campaign does not differentiate us. BTW when are the next 10,000 petitions to be handed in which were too bulky to carry at the last publicised meeting?

No I do not think he is offering the hand of friendship. He is resuming his role as a dictator especially when he threatens doubters with exclusion.

He is an intelligent man and must realise his most effective and intelligent comrades have deserted him, thus his sabre rattling.

For all his talk he is a wounded beast.

Today I have heard of many in our group who are throwing the towel in and leaving the party or at least activism and I am sure this will be replicated across the country.

To quote "a week in politics is a long time" and I would concur with John Bean (a true nationalist if ever there was one) who advises members in a letter to "BNP Ideas" to give it another three months before making any decision.
There are many problems facing the present leadership and we don't as yet know the outcome.

I shall continue my blog, criticising or praising as I see fit as is my democratic right.
I SHALL ALWAYS REMAIN A NATIONALIST who is in it for my country, to give to the cause, not to take.
If by my independence I cause sanctions to be instigated against me I shall continue with my blog to snap at the heels of those who in my opinion are letting our cause down by incompetence or financial chicanery as I am sure will others.

I had hoped for a more emollient piece from our leader and a sign that he really wanted unity.

Reading his first article it seems he has not learned the lesson of his near defeat, and he risks losing a large part of the now reduced membership over which he has presided.

FOR THE SAKE OF THE PARTY AND THE NATIONALIST CAUSE, he must be more accomodating and realise that the election has shown that--
HE IS NOT THE PARTY.

A CLOSE RUN THING

So the result of the leadership election and Nick Griffin has won by 9 votes.

So near and yet so far.

I must say I had not expected Andrew Brons to have managed to get so close to overturning the present dictatorship and neither I think did Nick Griffin.

However we must respect the democratic will of members however much it pains us.
The tragedy is that many, possibly hundreds of our best nationalists have given up on the party and their absence from our electorate has gifted Griffin this win.

THE QUALITY HAS LEFT THE PARTY, and it will not survive without them.

It means that the majority of nationalists in and out of the party would prefer a new leader and the fact that Griffin has won (this time fairly) means that our patriotic party remains split and impotent.

We still need find a way to unite and put away past differences if we are to get anywhere and the result means that outcome unlikely.

So what do we do? I don't really know.
I do know both sides are stubbornly intransigent and will not accept the other.

Will Nick Griffin accept that the majority of nationalists are against him? I doubt it.
Will those good people expelled rejoin if allowed under Griffin? No.

What is needed is for people's heads to be banged together to make them realise the cause is more important than any clique or person.

Possibly, just possibly sense will prevail, but I do not hold out much hope.

I can only wait for others ideas on what to do and pray for an answer.

THE DIE IS CAST.

So the day of destiny is tomorrow when the votes in the leadership election will be counted.

In recent weeks we have seen that the majority of the most respected members of the BNP have seen the need for change.
The only ones favouring Griffin are the armchair members who have little knowledge of the leader's machinations,a few activists who although hard working cannot see they are being taken for a ride and the cohort of recently joined members whose position depends on Griffin's survival.

Nick Griffin will probably win. He has seen to that, but that will be the end of the party as a credible force in British politics.

BUT WILL HE WIN THE HEARTS OF THE BRITISH ELECTORATE?
I doubt it.

He has been slow to condemn the Norwegian atrocities (has he has done so yet?) and thus has given an open goal to those who wish to taint nationalists as murderers.

Andrew was one of the first to condemn the killings, demonstrating his humanity and political nous.

If he wins there will be a mass exodus of the "quality" members, either by resignation or expulsion, and the party will be left with a small rump of second rate members still enthralled by his oratory but failing to see he is leading them down a blind alley.

Anybody who still believes in Nick after all his mistakes in throwing away the golden opportunity we had as a party is either politically naive or working for him.

If Andrew Brons wins we have just a chance that we can resurrect the party in an image more acceptible to the electorate and more democratic to its membership. It would give nationalists the opportunity to reunite as a cohesive and increasingly influential political presence.

If Andrew loses and Nick wins the cause of nationalism and possibly the fate of our nation will be set back years.

TRUE PATRIOTS CAN ONLY HOPE THAT THE ORDINARY MEMBERS CAN SEE THE LIGHT.

WE WAIT WITH BATED BREATH.

NOT THE ACTIONS OF A NATIONALIST

The horrific bonbing in Oslo and the following massacre of the young people at the youth camp has shocked and saddened all civilised people.

At first I like most people thought it carried the hallmarks of muslim extremists especially as there are 190,000 muslims in Norway and there have been threats from them in the past.

Now the perpetrator has turned out to be a native Norwegian the Lefty multiculturalists can hardly contain themselves calling him a "Right Wing" extremist, and thereby condemning by association all nationalist parties including the BNP.

This man was never a patriot nor a nationalist.

He is a nutter, pure and simple.

NATIONALIST DO NOT KILL THEIR OWN, especially young people (even if it was a political youth camp).
Nationalists believe in their own country and work to safeguard that by POLITICAL MEANS, NOT MURDER. This latter is the act of a psycopath not a political activist.

Although we do not know the details of this man, it seems he was a fundamentalist Christian and Mason.
Are these two groups also to be tainted by association?

The real shock of this outrage is that the killer was white European, showing how unusual and unexpected this kind of action in our civilised continent, and we can at least be thankful for that.

It is the exception rather than the rule, unlike the situation in islamic countries.

Unfortunately there will always be nutters in our otherwise civilised society such as the Dunblane gunman who murder as a result of mantal aberrations.

BUT DON'T BLAME NATIONALISM or "Right Wing" views.

WE ARE NOT LIKE THAT!

The buildings in Oslo can be replaced but those killed in Oslo and the innocent young people mercilessly butchered on the island can never be.

I SEND MY HEARTFELT SYMPATHIES TO THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS IN THEIR LOSS,inadequate I know but all I can do at this sad time.

THE FOLLY OF AID

A change for our party's navel gazing today.

Prominent in the papers and especially on BBC television is the dire situation in the Horn of Africa with millions going hungry.

The UN criticises Europe for being slow to contribute to food aid, but British people have voluntarily given millions in donations, although how close to the needy these will ever get is a different matter.

25 years ago we were urged by St Bob Geldoff and later by St Bono to give to famine relief in that region when the population was only half of its present size.

In other words the situation is made worse long term by their interference, for as the children are saved they adopt local habits and brred prolifically, without thinking of the consequences.

I would have liked more than two children but cut my family size to what I thought I and the country could sustain.

So why is famine a perennial problem in this area?
I believe it is because it is where the islamic world of thoughtless breeding meets Afican ignorance.
Muslims are encouraged to have large families while Africans lack the intellectual capacity to provide for them


Muslim countries in the Middle East have these overpopulation problems with young unemployed populations and this has been a reason for the recent unrest.
Fortunately for them they have had the oil money to fend off starvation by buying their food.This can not go on for ever as the increasing and ever more restless populations will inevitably overtake the capacity of those countries to feed them.
And then they (and we) will be in trouble.

Our foolish government already gives more of its national product than any other country even though we are a debter country to China and Arab oil countries who have so far failed to contribute anything.
Nor has any islamic country.

SO WHY SHOULD WE BORROW MONEY FROM RICHER SOLVENT COUNTRIES pay interest on it and give it away?



Why should the British people having had their tax money taken from them be cajoled into giving more?

It is not that I have no sympathy with these people's plight. I have, but we are in no position to continue to protect them from their own actions.We can not afford it especially as it is making matters worse.

IT IS THE ECONOMICS OF THE MADHOUSE and piracy of our taxpayers.

And WHICH OF THESE COUNTRIES WILL HELP US WHEN WE NEED IT? which we surely will if we continue to give away borrowed money.

THEY WON'T EVEN GIVE TO THEIR OWN! so God help us.

We, as a country are overpopulated, in debt and crowded out with alien peoples who care nothing for us or our land. We can not feed ourselves now let alone in the future when our population has increased owing to the influx of these uninvited immigrants.

We really are heading for disaster and sadly the proof that--

ENOCH POWELL WAS RIGHT.

I SHALL NOT BE CONTRIBUTING TO THIS APPEAL--AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU.

Cameron has already stolen too much in taxation from us and given it away.