MUSLIMS DO APPEAR TO LIKE HAMMERS ... AND HATE ANYONE NON-MUSLIM

.
It's not just Whitey they hate - doesn't matter what race you are, if you're not Muslim then you're fair game to be shoved off into eternity ... using a hammer (but we BNPers already knew that didn't we). Straight off the top of my head ... A BNP activist (Tony Ward), a Wiltshire schoolboy (Henry Webster), and a Sikh shopkeeper (Gurmail Singh). If you know of any more, please note them in the comment section.

Perhaps it's about time the police started doing stop/searches on Muslims?

And the leftards try to claim that WE are a bad bunch?

Want to put a stop to this sort of thing? Then vote BNP.

Four charged with shopkeeper's murder

UPDATE

I wasn't actually searching for this but just came across it on an American blog; however ...

 ... here's another one:

A CHURCHWARDEN tried to tackle a gang of masked robbers when they attacked him with a hammer as he prepared for a chapel service.

The robbers are described as Asian men, aged between 20 and 30, and wearing dark clothing and balaclavas. One is described as six feet tall and the others are of average height.

We all know the language don't we. What does "Asian" mean when the press uses it in this context?

http://www.burytimes.co.uk/news/4875902.Hammer_thugs_attack_pensioner_inside_chapel/

Morg
.

LIBERTY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION?

UKIP's Marta Andreasen wrote an open letter to David Cameron about the EU's latest assault on our freedoms - European Public Prosecutor (EPP), which is being planned by the EU. To date, she has received no reply.

What is EPP?

The EPP's office will have the power to prosecute, arrest and imprison people in our islands, on his orders - for months, with no public hearing. Police can come knocking on your door in the middle of the night to cart you away, and hold you for long months without charge or evidence.
We must not allow this to happen.

The intention of establishing an EPP's office was elicited from the neo-Commissioner, A Semeta, by UKIP's Marta Andreasen, during the EP hearings of the new Commissioners on January 12th.

This should be THE BIG issue facing us. Each member state has a veto over the establishment of an EPP.

We must raise the question - loudly, publicly, and BEFORE the election - of where each British political party stands on this.

The Lib Dems will welcome the EPP (the unspeakable Graham Watson boasts that he is the godfather of the dreadful European Arrest Warrant which, by the way, is just a foretaste of what the EPP holds in store for us).

Labour, when asked by Lord Stoddart where it stands on this, announced (Feb 9th) that it opposes the establishment of an EPP.

However, the decision to support or veto the EPP proposal will have to be made after the UK's general election. It will therefore be the decision of the next British government; the current government's announced opposition to the EPP will not bind a future government.

So what is Cameron's position on it?

Marta Andreasen sent Cameron an open letter (also given below), which was copied to all the members of both Houses of Parliament on February 4th, to ask him if he would pledge to veto any proposal for an EPP.

Philip Johnston had already written about it in the Telegraph on 1st February, posing the same question. The leader of UKIP, Lord Pearson, posed the  question in his blog, on 17th February.

So far there has been no response from Cameron.

This is a crucial question. UKIPers and all eurosceptics should hammer away at this issue, writing to their MPs, posing the question on their blogs, until we get an answer.

Should we fail to veto the proposal, the EU WILL set up its own Prosecutor's Office.

Once the principle of the Prosecutor's office has been accepted, it will be impossible to resist the call for the EPP to have his own rule book - Corpus Juris - and then his own enforcement agents - the European Gendarmerie Force.

That prospect alone should shock millions of Britons.

The European Arrest Warrant is but a smidgeon of a foretaste of what awaits.

Andrew Symeou has now been in jail for 7 months with no public hearing, and faces another year of the same. Under the EPP and Corpus Juris, this sort of treatment will be applied not just to those extradited outside Britain, but within Britain itself, under the new "European" laws and rules, which will be imposed on us, despite their being utterly alien to our own traditions.

Now Marta has an additional fear: that since the death of the head of OLAF in January, the German MEPs of all the political groupings, have been campaigning to have an interim head of OLAF nominated, who will be a "judge" - i.e. a member of a continental career judiciary.

OLAF is the EU's body for investigating fraud. If it has a career judge as its head, it will thereby acquire prosecutorial and judicial powers which, under continental rules, means vast discretionary powers of arresting and imprisoning suspects for long periods on little or no evidence, and via the EAW, these powers will be extended over all of Europe. This will give them an EPP by the back door.

OLAF is already under the de facto control of the Commission, which will thereby acquire fearsome enforcement powers of its own. OLAF has already strayed way beyond its remit, e.g. when it caused the Belgian police to ransack the office and confiscate the computers and files and arrest the person of Hans Tillack, the German journalist who had exposed instances of corruption in the Commission itself (they wanted him to reveal his sources). On that occasion it had to ask the Belgian police which, of course, was happy to oblige. But with a judicial figure as its head, armed with the powers of the EAW, it will be able to ORDER Belgian, or any other national police forces and courts, to arrest and hand over anybody it chooses, anywhere in Europe.

Remember, this will not be subject to British procedures with British safeguards, but to continental, Napoleonic-inquisitorial, procedures.  They will not need to produce evidence of wrong-doing in order to do this.

This is an immediate threat to national security, indeed to the personal safety of each and every one of us.

THIS is the huge threat that we the British public must be made aware of. The danger is imminent. Timing is of the essence.

AFTER THE GENERAL ELECTION it will be too late. If Cameron gets a working majority, he will be in the saddle for five years, and will let all these measures slide into place, unopposed. We must inform the British public BEFORE they vote.

 NICKED FROM HERE

AND WHILE YOU'RE IN A READING MOOD, TAKE A LOOK AT THIS. 

You really do NEED to vote BNP for YOUR OWN liberty! 

Morg

. 

LABOUR DEMOCRACY???

They were elected as New Labour, and they promised to govern as New Labour.

And yet they have done exactly what Old Labour have always done: bankrupted the country.

And the man responsible for a decade of economic inefficiency and fiscal incompetence as Chancellor of the Exchequer is now Her Majesty’s First Lord of the Treasury.

He was never elected as Prime Minister: he is distrusted by the majority of the nation, criticised by his own Chancellor, loathed by his own ministers and despised by many of his backbenchers.

This Labour Government took us to war on a false premise; has replaced Cabinet government with a politburo; diminished democracy; marginalised Parliament; taken in three million immigrants; saddled us with recession and soaring unemployment; given us the highest youth unemployment in history; eroded our liberties; abolished the right to trial by jury; raped the Constitution; politicised the civil service; sold off our gold reserves at the bottom of the market; raided our pensions; subjected us to the Lisbon Treaty; relegated us from 7th to 24th in international maths and literacy rankings; increased pensioner poverty; increased inequality; ... massively increased our tax burden; imposed an incredible 5000 new laws; created an authoritarian state and thoroughly debased our politics.

After 13 long years of extravagant spending, sinister social engineering, welfare expansion, uncontrolled immigration, endless fiddling with the electoral system, unparalleled electoral fraud, grotesque state encroachment into private lives and personal affairs and now a devalued currency, we have what must be the most stunningly incompetent government in the history of the United Kingdom (and God knows there are quite a few to choose from), and the most ideologically illiberal, oppressive and anti-Christian in centuries. 

Read it all 

Do the people of Wigan want another five years of this bunch below?

 

VOTE BNP

Morg

.

TROOPS HOME - PROTECT OUR OWN

TROOPS HOME - PROTECT OUR OWN !

BLAIR/BROWN/STRAW/HARMAN/HAIN ETC

GUILTY OF WAR-CRIMES!

THE CUTS IN LOCAL SERVICES

The proposals to remove 25,000 local authority from the workforce seems good at first. We need to cut waste and taxes.
But which workers would be made redundant?
You can bet it will be the care workers and not the overpaid and underworked Town Hall staff, diversity coordinators and outreach workers and the various inspectors which are such a hinderance to industry.
basically these positions are not services but a drag on taxpayers.

I accept that there is a lot of waste. I also accept that radical pruning of staff will make the recession worse.
So don't sack them. Just give them a proper job to do so we get some return for our money.
The overstaffed legions of inspectors should be given jobs in the fields they inspect.
Also the roads are full of potholes.

Surely a cheaper way of dealing with this is to buy some barrows, shovels and tarmac and send these people out to do a proper job repairing the roads.
Parking meter little Hitlers could be given the job of creating parking spaces and PCSOs could be given more useful jobs like litter picking or helping old people while probation officers could have a birch to use to correct the muggers, thus reducing prison costs.

Of course their salaries would have to be cut to the going rate but at least they would have the satisfaction of contributing to society rather than leeching from it--and we would get a return for our money.

Sorry Elliot I include you in this restructuring but I'm sure a bit of hard work would make you a lot fitter and there would be no need for you to go to the gym.

Islamic radicals 'infiltrate' the Labour Party

The Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE) — which believes in jihad and sharia law, and wants to turn Britain and Europe into an Islamic state — has placed sympathisers in elected office and claims, correctly, to be able to achieve “mass mobilisation” of voters.

Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, Jim Fitzpatrick, the Environment Minister, said the IFE had become, in effect, a secret party within Labour and other political parties.

“They are acting almost as an entryist organisation, placing people within the political parties, recruiting members to those political parties, trying to get individuals selected and elected so they can exercise political influence and power, whether it’s at local government level or national level,” he said.

“They are completely at odds with Labour’s programme, with our support for secularism.”

Mr Fitzpatrick, the MP for Poplar and Canning Town, said the IFE had infiltrated and “corrupted” his party in east London in the same way that the far-Left Militant Tendency did in the 1980s. Leaked Labour lists show a 110 per cent rise in party membership in one constituency in two years.

In a six-month investigation by this newspaper and Channel 4’s Dispatches, involving weeks of covert filming by the programme’s reporters:

• IFE activists boasted to the undercover reporters that they had already “consolidated … a lot of influence and power” over Tower Hamlets, a London borough council with a £1 billion budget.
• We have established that the group and its allies were awarded more than £10 million of taxpayers’ money, much of it from government funds designed to “prevent violent extremism”.
• IFE leaders were recorded expressing opposition to democracy, support for sharia law or mocking black people. The IFE organised meetings with extremists, including Taliban allies, a man named by the US government as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and a man under investigation by the FBI for his links to the September 11 attacks.
• Moderate Muslims in London told how the IFE and its allies were enforcing their hardline views on the rest of the local community, curbing behaviour they deemed “un-Islamic”. The owner of a dating agency received a threatening email from an IFE activist, warning her to close it.
• George Galloway, a London MP, admitted in recordings obtained by this newspaper that his surprise victory in the 2005 election owed more to the IFE “than it would be wise – for them – for me to say, adding that they played a “decisive role” in his triumph at the polls.

Mr Galloway now says they were one of many groups which supported his anti-war stance and had never sought to influence him.

The IFE has particularly close links to Tower Hamlets council. Seven serving and former councillors said Lutfur Rahman, the current council leader, gained his post with the group’s help.

Some said they were canvassed by a senior IFE official on his behalf. After Mr Rahman was elected, a man with close links to the group, Lutfur Ali, was appointed assistant chief executive of the council with responsibility for grant funding.

This was despite a chequered employment record, a misleading CV and a negative report from the headhunters appointed to consider the candidates. The council’s white chief executive was subsequently forced from his post.

Since Mr Rahman became leader, more council grants have been paid to a number of organisations which our investigation established are closely linked to the IFE.

Funding for other, secular groups was ended or cut. In the borough’s well-known Brick Lane area, council funds were switched from a largely secular heritage trail to a highly controversial “hijab sculpture”, angering many residents who accused the council of “religious triumphalism”.

Schools in Tower Hamlets are told by the council should close for the Muslim festival of Eid, even where most of their pupils are not Muslim.

Mr Rahman refused to deny that an IFE activist had canvassed councillors on his behalf. He said: “There are various people across Tower Hamlets who get excited, who get involved.”

He would not comment on concerns about infiltration, saying they were “party matters”. He said: “If you look at our flagship policies, like investing £20 million to tackle overcrowding, you can see that we are working for everyone.”

The IFE said it did not seek to influence the council and had not lobbied for Mr Rahman. “If anything, existing members of the Labour Party have joined the IFE, rather than the other way round,” it said.

The group insisted it was not a fundamentalist or extremist organisation and did not support violence.

New labour are responsible for every single death, beating and hatred of the Indigenous population by ISLAMISTS.
And now they want to join the BNP, due to New Labours EHRC Hate Quango.
The BNP have been telling you that things were not quite as they seem.
Where have our SECURITY FORCES BEEN ?

http://bnp.org.uk/2010/02/frankenstein's monster devours its creator labour party being-taken-over by islamists/

Labour's hypocrisy over migrants: How the party is trying to woo voters with tactics that would shame the BNP

I had to put this on here.

All the so-called polls have been showing a Small Conservative Majority and ZaNu Labour are second.
Then what are zaNu Labour worried about ?
Wasn't the MSM telling us that the BNP are losing members ?

Is the real truth in these polls showing a massive rise for the BNP ?
Whatever it is..THEY'RE TERRIFIED.

ROLL ON GENERAL ELECTION.

"The carefully worded letters all send the same sympathetic messages to local 'white families' about the difficulties caused by the record rise in immigration.

Soothing words of comfort are combined with powerful pledges of action to ease the pressure on jobs, school places and council housing.

'There is a great deal of worry about the pressure on schools, doctors' surgeries and housing allocations,' reads one of them. 'I want you to help me keep the pressure up on the Government in relation to reforming and updating our immigration and citizenship rules and laws.'

Stirring stuff indeed. So which party do you think is promising to fight the Government on these policy failings? The Conservatives? UKIP, perhaps?

No, with astonishing hypocrisy, these pledges come from the Labour Party itself. For the authors are senior Labour MPs who fear losing their seats as a result of the political fall-out from the mass immigration policy that they gladly helped to implement.

Dozens of these letters from sitting Labour MPs have been passed to the Daily Mail - and the authors all have one thing in common. They are fighting for their political lives because of the threat posed by the odious, far-Right British National Party.

They include Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary and key ally of Gordon Brown, and Margaret Hodge, the Culture Minister who is fighting a seat in the East End of London.

Some of the leaflets sent out to constituents include dubious immigration questionnaires and promises that local people will be put first in the jobs queue.

Labour's hypocrisy has come to light only days after the scale of Labour's deliberate plan to create a multicultural Britain through mass immigration was revealed.

A draft Cabinet Office report, uncovered by a Freedom of Information request, showed how, in 2000, Labour ministers deliberately plotted to open the floodgates to new migrants to achieve the party's 'social objectives'. Traditionally, new immigrants vote for Left-wing parties.

The document also revealed how those who dared to question this policy would be branded 'racists'.

Today, however, on the cusp of a General Election, many Labour MPs have realised that their secret plan has backfired spectacularly. As a result of mass immigration, many of their core white working-class voters complain that they feel like second-class citizens in their own communities, and believe that immigrants are given unfair precedence for jobs and public services.

As a result, Labour MPs in marginal seats or with a BNP threat are desperately scrambling to play the race card in a shameless attempt to be seen as acting tough on immigration after all.

One of the MPs at the heart of the new get-tough policy on immigration in constituency backyards is Mr Balls, who is the Prime Minister's closest political friend.

Mr Balls has been at the centre of Cabinet decision-making over the past decade and will have been only too well aware of Labour's encouragement of a multicultural Britain.

Mr Balls, a front-runner to succeed Mr Brown as Labour leader, has held two public meetings and produced direct mail and questionnaires on the immigration issue in his newly-created Morley and Outwood constituency.

Significantly, the Schools Secretary's Yorkshire constituency is a fertile breeding ground for the BNP, which already has one BNP councillor and hundreds of members registered locally.

In his recent constituency newsletter, Mr Balls wrote: 'I want to have a conversation with you about immigration. What we really need is proper discussion about the difficulties and benefits that immigration can bring to our country.'

He admitted that there were 'concerns about jobs in our area', and asked: 'Do you support updating our immigration laws so that: migrants who want to settle here must speak English? A probationary period should be passed before they are able to claim state benefits?'

It is a similar story in Barking - the East London constituency where BNP leader Nick Griffin is fighting the Culture Minister Margaret Hodge.

With one of the highest rates of immigration in Britain, Barking has seen a massive social upheaval as a result of Labour's policy, with many local families struggling to come to terms with the sheer number of new arrivals from abroad.

Yet in a two-page letter to constituents, Mrs Hodge paints herself as being tough on immigration, saying that it can be 'very unsettling' for 'predominantly white' and 'traditional East End families'.

She adds: 'I respect your concerns about the pace of change. It is wrong for others to dismiss these out of hand and rest assured that you do have my support on this.'

Earlier this month, Mrs Hodge even suggested that migrants should be forced to 'earn' the right to benefits and council housing over several years. She warned that British values of tolerance were under threat because of an increasing sense of 'unfairness' over immigration.

In his recent constituency newsletter, Mr Balls wrote: 'I want to have a conversation with you about immigration. What we really need is proper discussion about the difficulties and benefits that immigration can bring to our country.'

He admitted that there were 'concerns about jobs in our area', and asked: 'Do you support updating our immigration laws so that: migrants who want to settle here must speak English? A probationary period should be passed before they are able to claim state benefits?'

It is a similar story in Barking - the East London constituency where BNP leader Nick Griffin is fighting the Culture Minister Margaret Hodge.

With one of the highest rates of immigration in Britain, Barking has seen a massive social upheaval as a result of Labour's policy, with many local families struggling to come to terms with the sheer number of new arrivals from abroad.

Yet in a two-page letter to constituents, Mrs Hodge paints herself as being tough on immigration, saying that it can be 'very unsettling' for 'predominantly white' and 'traditional East End families'.

She adds: 'I respect your concerns about the pace of change. It is wrong for others to dismiss these out of hand and rest assured that you do have my support on this.'

Earlier this month, Mrs Hodge even suggested that migrants should be forced to 'earn' the right to benefits and council housing over several years. She warned that British values of tolerance were under threat because of an increasing sense of 'unfairness' over immigration."