THE ACTIONS OF BASTARDS

First of all happy New Year to all especially my fellow patriots.
Unfortunately there will be no celebrations for the family of Corporal Liam Elms from Wrightington who was killed on Boxing Day in Afganistan.
There will be no picture of him on this blog out of respect.

Poor lad, he signed up to defend his country and was sent to a barbarous place in an unjust war and has paid with his life.
I don't know how the traitors of this government and their Tory supporters sleep in their beds at this needless sacrifice of some of our best young people while at the same time allow people supportive of the ones who killed him into our country.
Much of the terrorism in the West is a reaction to our actions in the Middle East and our continued presence and meddling in other countries affairs.
But our politicians and their wealthy supporters are in no danger. Their kids are not sent out to face the music. Perhaps if they did we would not be involved.
They do not have to compete here for houses, jobs or fear terrorism like ordinary people.
And now our country is an economic basket case as predicted by us.
I despise them.
Someday we will exact justice. They will pay for their betrayal OF OUR PEOPLE.

ZANULABS' INJUNCTED INJUNCTIONS. FREE COUNTRY?

I know Wikileaks isn't exactly our flavour of the month just now, due to it being the original publisher of 'The List', but during the arguments I got involved in on the Web (on non-nationalist sites) someone told me not to criticise Wikileaks too much because, with my being a BNPer, it may one day save my neck by leaking something. I had to concede the point as it is obvious from regular reading of it that indeed, it has no favourite friends or enemies.

Despite my being on the list, and having had one of the infamous phone calls (he was easy - not exactly the brightest star in the sky) and an awful lot of spam, I am a supporter of Wikileaks. We need a site like it out there. Read on to find out why.

Back during the 'Spycatcher' days when injunctions were flying around like confetti (remember?), my brother and I used to talk of the chances of a newspaper being served with an injunction ... and then a further injunction preventing the paper from telling readers about the existence of the first injunction. Well, under our current zanulab government the situation is infinitely worse - seems now even the injuncted person may not be told of the injunction .... with 10 years jail as the penalty for violating said secret injunction. George Orwell hadn't a clue eh?

"" December the 15th saw a secret UK court hearing, with secret participants, produce a secret order to secretly gag the population, the terms of which are secret and the revelation of which is punishable by up to 10 years of imprisonment. How many of these orders exist is unknowable — we glimpse at the severity of the problem only when the orders are violated. So let's start violating them.

Wikileaks previously released the gag order for the Northern Rock bank collapse, now we release the secret gag order made by High Court Justice Tugendhat on Dec 15, 2008 aimed at covering up an email leak from the British establishment. The secret order first targeted UK newspapers, but our copy was destined for the UK Parliamentary blogger 'Guido Fawkes', editor of 'order-order.com'. The summary states:

1. The identities of the Applicants/Claimants must remain confidential.
2. The fact of the existence of the Orders must remain confidential.
3. The terms of the Orders must remain confidential. ""

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Secret_gag_orders_undermine_core_Western_values

Do follow the link and read the entire article. Might also be a good idea to read the extra links at the bottom of it.

Having just violated article 2. above, can I now expect a 2 a.m. visit that might last ten years? Bring it on.

Morg.

.

GOOD PROGRESS ALL ROUND

First of all, congratulations to Whitehaven and Ibstock on their fantastic results.
Whitehaven was superb with a Labour majority of over 1000 being almost overturned , just 16 votes short with a 40% share of the vote. This was achieved by hard work and shows what can be done and that support for the Party is growing fast in spite of all the media throw at us.
The Ibstock result was also very good we ending only 15 votes behind.

The reaction to our party has changed beyond recognition in the last 5 years.

When I first joined the Party people would not believe I had joined such an "extreme" party and I had to show my membership card to prove my membership.
Last Friday I was at the same pub as I was 5 years ago for our Christmas "do" and I was approached by 5 people wanting to know more about the Party.
I did not know them,but one of them recognised me so they came up to me, so it was not me canvassing but others wanting to know about us.

People are becoming ever more disillusioned with the other parties and their failed policies which have filled the country with people who often do not like us but aim to better themselves at our expense.

People are worried about their jobs, their kids future and the growing influence of the immigrants pouring in and taking housing, jobs and benefits. They see the betrayal of our industries by the Tories and Labour and the theft of our wealth by greedy bankers.
They see that in spite of the lies spouted by the media that our policies on the economy, EU and immigration are the only ones to give us a future.
They see --
THAT ONLY THE BNP CARES FOR BRITISH PEOPLE.
THAT'S WHY WE ARE GROWING--- AND FAST!

AUSTRALIAN POLITICS

T. B. Bechtel, a part-time City Councilman from Newcastle, NSW was asked on a local live radio talk show, just what he thought of the allegations of torture of the Iraqi prisoners. His reply prompted his ejection from the studio, but to thunderous applause from the audience.

HIS STATEMENT: "If hooking up an Iraqi prisoner's nuts to a car's battery cables will save just one Australian's life, then I have just three things to say:

Red is positive,
Black is negative,
and make sure his nuts are wet."

Oh for a bit of Australian robustness in our local politicians.

FRED THOMPSON ON VOODOO ECONOMICS

Please Fred, tell us you're only talking about America ... and not Britain.

But we Brits know you're talking about us too, aren't you. With our very own saviour of the world in Downing Street.

Watch it all, because near the end he tells us what the real problem is.

Give your children as happy a Christmas as you possibly can ...

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7IrR3o7x1ps

Morg

.

THE FEAR OF DEMOCRACY

A proposal to have directly elected members of local Police Authorities is causing concern among Labour councillors and MPs.

Cllr Paul Murphy of the Greater Manchester Police authority said that allowing local representation could result in "extremist " and "single issue parties such as the BNP " with different agendas gaining influence. "I have heard that the BNP would endeavour to gain representation" he said.

TOO RIGHT WE WOULD!

Of course we have a different agenda from that of the other parties.

As far as policing is concerned we do NOT agree with wanted terrorists being employed to "advise" Scotland Yard.

We do NOT agree with persecution of legitimate leafletters and members of a legal political party being arrested and their homes searched.

We DO object to the police chief in Manchester saying he would destroy the BNP.

We DO object to a policeman being sacked for wearing a BNP badge when off duty even though he was not a Party member.

We DO object that membership of the BNP is proscribed in the Police Force whereas membership of extremist groups who wish to take over this country such as Hizb ut Tahrir is not.

These are just a few police matters we would aim to correct.

I presume Cllr Murphy considers himself non political as well as the chairman of the commons committee Keith Vaz MP (who spends much of his time resisting immigration controls). No doubt they consider the above complaints of no importance or the abuse of power they demonstrate justified.

But did they stand as Independants or on the Labour ticket? They are hypocrits as well.

AND THEY CALL US EXTREME!

The good news is that their worries are a sign of our increasing influence, and a threat to their cosy consensus and objective of the destruction of our country.

Of course we , as a political party want influence, there's not much point in being a party if we don't.

As far as being single issue party I suppose we are--

TO AVOID THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE, and we will continue to work to this end in spite of them.

LOCAL POSTAL STRIKE

No doubt some of you will be really irritated with our postmen over the local postal strike.

But have a read, and learn what's really behind all the problems we've been having with the Post Office closures and the difficulties with our postmen (and women ... sorry girls). Our postal staff are deliberately forced into these actions - and also sub-post offices closed - in an effort to make us think that maybe privatisation would be for the best.

Because that is what the politicians and the senior postal management want - the politicians because there is a European Union directive to that effect - not that you'll read that in the press or hear it on Al Beeb - and the senior management because they can smell the riches and share options that the utilities senior management got.

Read these - especially read the second one:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7785177.stm

http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2008/12/euro-mail.html

UPDATE: Recommend reading the comments and following the links within the EUReferendum blog linked to above. Here's a sample comment:

This brilliant explanation has haunted me since I read it in May:

"… The postal services directives have exactly the same agenda as all the other so-called 'liberalising' instruments, whether they are dealing with energy, rail services, telecommunications, or whatever. The intent is to break up national monopolies, not for the sake of it, but in order to recreate then on a European level, under the direct control of the EU commission.

Thus, the attack on national monopolies is not an attack on the monopolies per se but an attack on nationalism – it is an attack on the nation state, an attempt to reduce the power and influence of the member states. As such, the EU has no rooted objection to monopolies – it is, after all, itself a monopoly. Its apparent enthusiasm for 'competition' is simply a smokescreen to gull free-market liberals into supporting its deeper agenda."

From:

http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2008/0 ... phase.html


Morg

.