The disgraceful situations in our hospitals with patients being literally starved to death or left unattended in thier own faeces has shocked the nation.
To our shame two of the hospitals are local to us, Whiston and Ormskirk.
The usual excuse is "lessons will be learnt" is just not good enough. What lesson needs to be learnt that patients need good nutrition and the ability to get to it if bed ridden?
What lessons need to be learnt that patients often need to be taken to the toilet and not left in their own excrement?
What lesson needs to be learnt that a bit of compassion and privacy is needed for patients?
Now I am a bit ashamed about this as I did my medical housejobs at Whiston. Then it was old fashioned and of course lacked modern diagnostic equipment and patients were in large wards of thirty patients.
Then they were well nursed, even in the geriatric block housing altogether 180 patients all those patients were well looked after and measures to prevent pressure sores strictly observed.
What has gone wrong?
Well we all know that with the demise of the Matron standards have gone downhill and hospitals are run from the office.
We, doctors and nurses were in fear of the wrath of the matron and that ensured standards were high wards were clean and patients attended to.
There was no central station where all the qualified staff sat behind computers as they do now. The trained nurses were all on the ward observing the patients.
Possibly a cause of hospital acquired infections has something to do with the present slack standards.
I know nowadays boxes have to be ticked and reports made but if that is all nursing is about, why not just have an office and let the relatives do the work.
OH THAT IS THE LATEST SUGGESTION. Families coming into hospital to feed their sick relatives, presumably so that the nurses can remain behind their computers and tick all the boxes.
That is going to do wonders for infection control with many family members carrying who knows what infection into the wards each mealtime.
So what is to be done to ensure proper care? In the past hospitals have been fined, but that is just fining the taxpayer and denuding the hospital of funds.
Chief executives have been removed but given generous severance payments and pensions and sometimes been employed in other NHS establishments, but it seems this is to no avail.
I believe it rests with the boss. In the NHS the buck stops with no one.
In business if the boss makes mistakes it hits him in the pocket and can bankrupt him.
This is what should happen in hospitals (and councils).
There should a financial penalty for deficiencies, severe enough to ensure those in charge do what they should. They have remunerations far in excess of what they had in the past.
We should insist that they earn it and if they fail, hit them in the pocket.
SO TO SOLVE THESE PROBLEMS, MAKE SURE THE BUCK STOPS WITH THE BOSS.
P.S I don't know about the wards but the staff in outpatients at Wigan Infirmary could not be more helpful, a contrast with other establishments I have visited recently, but then they are Wiganers and we have avoided so far the worst hospital infection of all, multiculturalism.
I just wish they could improve car parking facilities.
Thursday, 13 October 2011
CAMERON'S COMPASSION?
David Cameron in pledging a greater proportion of our GDP than any other country says he feels a warm satisfaction at the good this programme does in reducing poverty in the Third World.
He like Geldoff and Bono are good at encouraging people much poorer then they are to give money and in Cameron's case making it obligitory by spending our taxes on these worthy projects.
Our government of course is in debt and incurs more debt to assist these countries who often have a better bank balance than do we.
Now I do not agree with all this involuntary taxpayer largess but a quick look at the recipients shows clearly where Camerons preferences lie and his assessment of the relative importance of various human rights in his mind.
Thus until recently, China with a poor human rights record and many executions and political prisoners has been a recipient of our forced largesse as had India which posseses aircraft carriers which we can not afford. India has a wealthy upper class well able to financially to help the "Untouchables" who live in abject poverty. No discrimination there then.
Pakistan, a corrupt regime with a penchant for persecuting and even killing Christians receives masses of aid, well it's for the poor children you see.
Afghanistan with an even worse and corrupt regime consumes billions in aid. Well it's for the women's education you see. I know they behead infidels but you have to consider the poor children, and in any case it is their culture and we must not interfere.
Countries in Africa, notorious for torture and worse are helped. Yes we know they are corrupt and most of the money ends up in Swiss bank accounts but some does get through to the poor, helping to alleviate hunger.
So It's nice to know we are helping all contries to create a better life and save children from starvation even if little gets beyond the agencies organising it at least some does.
It must gladden his heart that we are helping mitigate child starvation in all these poor countries.
All the needy will be helped WON'T THEY.
WELL NO. Any country who locks up people with what they in their culture perceive as un natural sexual proclivities will get no aid from us. These people of minority sexual inclinations must be released immediately or no further aid will be given.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE STARVING CHILDREN? YOU ASK.
Sorry but their life and death does not matter as much as what is seen as a persecution of "gays"
So there you have it. Cameron's compassion.
Behead, torture, kill or steal form the poor and it will be ignored BUT, lock up a few homosexuals in your country and aid will be stopped AND YOUR CHILDREN DIE.
HOW COMPASSIONATE!
It just demonstrates the hold the "Gay" lobby has over the government.
Their rights are worth more than life and death, but then the coalition in is only helping its own containing as it does many Limp Dems, and we know what they are like don't we?
He like Geldoff and Bono are good at encouraging people much poorer then they are to give money and in Cameron's case making it obligitory by spending our taxes on these worthy projects.
Our government of course is in debt and incurs more debt to assist these countries who often have a better bank balance than do we.
Now I do not agree with all this involuntary taxpayer largess but a quick look at the recipients shows clearly where Camerons preferences lie and his assessment of the relative importance of various human rights in his mind.
Thus until recently, China with a poor human rights record and many executions and political prisoners has been a recipient of our forced largesse as had India which posseses aircraft carriers which we can not afford. India has a wealthy upper class well able to financially to help the "Untouchables" who live in abject poverty. No discrimination there then.
Pakistan, a corrupt regime with a penchant for persecuting and even killing Christians receives masses of aid, well it's for the poor children you see.
Afghanistan with an even worse and corrupt regime consumes billions in aid. Well it's for the women's education you see. I know they behead infidels but you have to consider the poor children, and in any case it is their culture and we must not interfere.
Countries in Africa, notorious for torture and worse are helped. Yes we know they are corrupt and most of the money ends up in Swiss bank accounts but some does get through to the poor, helping to alleviate hunger.
So It's nice to know we are helping all contries to create a better life and save children from starvation even if little gets beyond the agencies organising it at least some does.
It must gladden his heart that we are helping mitigate child starvation in all these poor countries.
All the needy will be helped WON'T THEY.
WELL NO. Any country who locks up people with what they in their culture perceive as un natural sexual proclivities will get no aid from us. These people of minority sexual inclinations must be released immediately or no further aid will be given.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE STARVING CHILDREN? YOU ASK.
Sorry but their life and death does not matter as much as what is seen as a persecution of "gays"
So there you have it. Cameron's compassion.
Behead, torture, kill or steal form the poor and it will be ignored BUT, lock up a few homosexuals in your country and aid will be stopped AND YOUR CHILDREN DIE.
HOW COMPASSIONATE!
It just demonstrates the hold the "Gay" lobby has over the government.
Their rights are worth more than life and death, but then the coalition in is only helping its own containing as it does many Limp Dems, and we know what they are like don't we?
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
PRESERVATION OF RARE BREEDS
There is a series on the increase in numbers of mixed race in Britain on the BBC of course headed by George Alligia a mixed race newsreader himself of course who can give his unbiassed views on the subject and help celebrate the rapidly increasing numbers of mixed race people as a proportion of the population.
What the programmes are about is in truth race replacement. This situation has been encouraged by various "liberal groups" in positions of influence and see in white Europeans as everything bad, in spite of our contribution to human knowledge. These people must be infused with new blood they say.
Hybrid vigour they say. The mixed race offspring are superior to the natives as a result of this genetic infusion they say.
In effect it is a process of eugenics perpetrated against the European people, which if it had been done the other way round would have been decried as Fascism, which of course it is.
But promoting white English people's loss of their genetic heritage will never be shown in these terms.
The insidious propaganda behind these programmes is that mixed race people are superior to pure white people.
Well I was a pedigree cattle breeder and know all about the dangers of inbreeding as a result.
Thus we were obliged to purchase a new bull (of the same breed of course) to avoid this often at great cost to ensure the right genetic material.
This bull would be put with cows also selected for their superior traits otherwise his value would have been wasted and the calves produced of poor quality.
Now I am not comparing people with cattle but the genetic imperatives are just the same.
The most usual infusion of new blood into our society is from a black man who has a child with one or many white slags, many of whom are members of the underclass and ugly or oversexed or they could have chosen a white man to father their child.
So what is the result. A combinationof their genetic characteristics. His athleticism rhythm and social irresponsibility but on average lack of brain power with hers, low inelligence and slothfulness. I am not saying all such mixtures will have exactly the same result but the general end result will be an increase in the population of violent unintelligent but physically strong people.
Lest this is thought a racist rant I do believe some new blood can be beneficial but in small amounts.
Thus peoples of the Middle East are generally intelligent even though they are often blighted in their own countries by their muslim creed. If they integrate here, leave islam and have a child with an English partner the result can be a genius such as the late Steve Jobs.
But how many mixed race people of African descent make a mark in the intellectual world? Not many.
Indians as well as Chinese are also clever and mixed race offspring often do well.
BUT we can not tolerate too many without losing our culture. If they lived here in small numbers we could just about tolerate the situation.
Pakistanis of course exhibit the opposite effect by cousin marriage causing a high proportion of genetic deformities.
Many, including Nick Griffin and television personalities support the preservation of rare breeds of domestic animals. Knowing little about livestock they do not realise the reason for that rarity. They breed and grow slowly and are out competed in one way or another.
Endangered species are also rightly protected. Remember the concern that the Ruddy Duck was interbreeding with native wild ducks and threatening their genetic purity. What happened? The interlopers were shot to preserve the native ducks, even though these species were closely related enough to interbreed
One endangered species whose extinction the media seem to welcome is the white Europeans and especially British people.
Does our genetic heritage not matter.? Are we less important than ducks? It seems so.
Why are we endangered? Because we are not producing as many children as the mixed races and muslims.
Humans like animals are subject to a Darwinian system and we are losing our race in more ways than one.
As a member of that increasingly threatened rare breed, a white Englishman I am determined to preserve our pure European pedigree, although too old to do it by breeding.
We are on the danger list. The media seem to welcome that.
WE MUST ACT TO PREVENT OUR EXTINCTION
What the programmes are about is in truth race replacement. This situation has been encouraged by various "liberal groups" in positions of influence and see in white Europeans as everything bad, in spite of our contribution to human knowledge. These people must be infused with new blood they say.
Hybrid vigour they say. The mixed race offspring are superior to the natives as a result of this genetic infusion they say.
In effect it is a process of eugenics perpetrated against the European people, which if it had been done the other way round would have been decried as Fascism, which of course it is.
But promoting white English people's loss of their genetic heritage will never be shown in these terms.
The insidious propaganda behind these programmes is that mixed race people are superior to pure white people.
Well I was a pedigree cattle breeder and know all about the dangers of inbreeding as a result.
Thus we were obliged to purchase a new bull (of the same breed of course) to avoid this often at great cost to ensure the right genetic material.
This bull would be put with cows also selected for their superior traits otherwise his value would have been wasted and the calves produced of poor quality.
Now I am not comparing people with cattle but the genetic imperatives are just the same.
The most usual infusion of new blood into our society is from a black man who has a child with one or many white slags, many of whom are members of the underclass and ugly or oversexed or they could have chosen a white man to father their child.
So what is the result. A combinationof their genetic characteristics. His athleticism rhythm and social irresponsibility but on average lack of brain power with hers, low inelligence and slothfulness. I am not saying all such mixtures will have exactly the same result but the general end result will be an increase in the population of violent unintelligent but physically strong people.
Lest this is thought a racist rant I do believe some new blood can be beneficial but in small amounts.
Thus peoples of the Middle East are generally intelligent even though they are often blighted in their own countries by their muslim creed. If they integrate here, leave islam and have a child with an English partner the result can be a genius such as the late Steve Jobs.
But how many mixed race people of African descent make a mark in the intellectual world? Not many.
Indians as well as Chinese are also clever and mixed race offspring often do well.
BUT we can not tolerate too many without losing our culture. If they lived here in small numbers we could just about tolerate the situation.
Pakistanis of course exhibit the opposite effect by cousin marriage causing a high proportion of genetic deformities.
Many, including Nick Griffin and television personalities support the preservation of rare breeds of domestic animals. Knowing little about livestock they do not realise the reason for that rarity. They breed and grow slowly and are out competed in one way or another.
Endangered species are also rightly protected. Remember the concern that the Ruddy Duck was interbreeding with native wild ducks and threatening their genetic purity. What happened? The interlopers were shot to preserve the native ducks, even though these species were closely related enough to interbreed
One endangered species whose extinction the media seem to welcome is the white Europeans and especially British people.
Does our genetic heritage not matter.? Are we less important than ducks? It seems so.
Why are we endangered? Because we are not producing as many children as the mixed races and muslims.
Humans like animals are subject to a Darwinian system and we are losing our race in more ways than one.
As a member of that increasingly threatened rare breed, a white Englishman I am determined to preserve our pure European pedigree, although too old to do it by breeding.
We are on the danger list. The media seem to welcome that.
WE MUST ACT TO PREVENT OUR EXTINCTION
SORRY ENGLISHMAN, A PICTURE.
Sorry Englishman for the absence of the picture of Haigh hall on a previous blog. Here is one of the hall itself.
It is set in a large area of parkland which extends to within a quarter mile of Wigan town centre and is a great asset to the town and it's people.
The hall itself looks well from the outside and in the front rooms which are used for receptions but the roof and rear behind the facade are in a shocking state of disrepair.
Wigan MBC has a history of cultural vandalism.
When, a few years ago when building a new shopping precinct they found a Roman bath house which they took to pieces and placed the remnants behind the new buildings.
These Roman buildings could have been preserved. Wigan could have used these as a tourist attraction "Visit Roman Wigan",(far better than Wigan Pier.
But then the people running the council, then and now are cultural illiterates and soon our ancient town will be merely a shopping clone of many other towns with a far less historic past.
We need councillors who take pride in and love our town rather than their pockets.
WILL WE GET THEM? MAYBE IN THE FUTURE BUT THEN IT WILL BE TOO LATE.
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
LIKE A CORNERED RAT
As I said yesterday I was disappointed at how little the Panorama programme exposed.
This programme was nothing to do with politics but was only concerned with allegations of financial misdemeanours. Thus any questions asked had a validity to the State and especially to members whose hard earned cash had been use to finance the party.
Mention of the massive amount of money that Jim Dowson has allegedly gathered for the Party was there, but no indication of how it was spent was elucidated, just a statement that the General Election cost it a lot of money.
How much? We have never been told.
Yes I know there were over 100 lost deposits which would have cost over £50,000 but what about the rest.
The local parties were billed and paid for their leaflets so where was the rest of this huge amount spent?
I agree with Simon Darby that the programme was a bit of a damp squib but why in that case were there six articles attacking the programme and the BBC for creating it?
If it had no effect and all the allegations wrong why keep going on about it.This obsession with a not very informative programme and their reaction to it tends to make me believe there is much more hidden under the carpet.
Perhaps some is sub judice, I expect there is and much more will be revealed later.
In that case the BBC in its mission to close down the Party(which I agree it has) has acted prematurely. Why I can only guess. Is it inefficiency or by design?
Only time will tell but one thing is certain Griffin is unsettled by it.
The truth will come out sooner or later but in the meantime Nationalists have to move the cause forward.
The politics of the BNP are broadly correct and more a reflection of member's opimions than those of any other party.
IT IS THE LEADERSHIP WHICH IS WRONG AND WHICH PUTS THE VOTERS OFF.
Nick Griffin must realise that HE IS NOT THE PARTY.The Party belongs to its members.
I wonder whether he will hang on in his bunker until the end as did Hitler in the hope of eventual victory.
If so he will find himself with a tiny rump of incompetents still believing as did Hitler in the bunker.
We nationalists must not allow him to take our movement down with him.
We must forge a new movement and unite with other patriots in honest and common cause to save our country, even if that means a new party amalgamated with other patriots.
It can be done.
IT MUST BE DONE.
I expect a start to be made next week at Andrew Brons's meeting. I hope so for all our sakes..
P S Do you know there is a clause in the BNP constitution that guarantees Nick Griffin a generous pension paid out of Party funds? It was pushed through by him at the EGM in Codnor three years ago.
If you have forgotten I bet he hasn't, but it's still there.
So the few of you who remain loyal to the man who has deceived you will find yourselves liable for another bill. Of course if there is no BNP where does the money come from?
I neither know nor care.
I just know I will not be paying it.
IT WILL BE YOU.
This programme was nothing to do with politics but was only concerned with allegations of financial misdemeanours. Thus any questions asked had a validity to the State and especially to members whose hard earned cash had been use to finance the party.
Mention of the massive amount of money that Jim Dowson has allegedly gathered for the Party was there, but no indication of how it was spent was elucidated, just a statement that the General Election cost it a lot of money.
How much? We have never been told.
Yes I know there were over 100 lost deposits which would have cost over £50,000 but what about the rest.
The local parties were billed and paid for their leaflets so where was the rest of this huge amount spent?
I agree with Simon Darby that the programme was a bit of a damp squib but why in that case were there six articles attacking the programme and the BBC for creating it?
If it had no effect and all the allegations wrong why keep going on about it.This obsession with a not very informative programme and their reaction to it tends to make me believe there is much more hidden under the carpet.
Perhaps some is sub judice, I expect there is and much more will be revealed later.
In that case the BBC in its mission to close down the Party(which I agree it has) has acted prematurely. Why I can only guess. Is it inefficiency or by design?
Only time will tell but one thing is certain Griffin is unsettled by it.
The truth will come out sooner or later but in the meantime Nationalists have to move the cause forward.
The politics of the BNP are broadly correct and more a reflection of member's opimions than those of any other party.
IT IS THE LEADERSHIP WHICH IS WRONG AND WHICH PUTS THE VOTERS OFF.
Nick Griffin must realise that HE IS NOT THE PARTY.The Party belongs to its members.
I wonder whether he will hang on in his bunker until the end as did Hitler in the hope of eventual victory.
If so he will find himself with a tiny rump of incompetents still believing as did Hitler in the bunker.
We nationalists must not allow him to take our movement down with him.
We must forge a new movement and unite with other patriots in honest and common cause to save our country, even if that means a new party amalgamated with other patriots.
It can be done.
IT MUST BE DONE.
I expect a start to be made next week at Andrew Brons's meeting. I hope so for all our sakes..
P S Do you know there is a clause in the BNP constitution that guarantees Nick Griffin a generous pension paid out of Party funds? It was pushed through by him at the EGM in Codnor three years ago.
If you have forgotten I bet he hasn't, but it's still there.
So the few of you who remain loyal to the man who has deceived you will find yourselves liable for another bill. Of course if there is no BNP where does the money come from?
I neither know nor care.
I just know I will not be paying it.
IT WILL BE YOU.
CRIMINAL NEGLECT
Now for some news of local incompetence.
Haigh Hall gifted to the then Wigan council by Lord Crawford and described as "The Jewel of The Town" with its attendant country park close to the town centre has been found to have a leaking roof.
Well that is a surprise. I went on a conducted tour of the building over ten years ago and was shocked by its condition.
The rooms open to the public seemed in good repair but the back of the building and the attics were in a state of disrepair.
The attic formerly housing the nursery room and servants quarters was a shambles. There were leaks in the roof, but they had at least put buckets under these leaks (big deal) and "acro" supports holding some of the joists up.
I asked why repairs could not be done and was told that a covenant prevented it as the building belonged to the people of Wigan.
One room at the back WAS used as a Social Services office as this was allowed as helping the people of Wigan though why a Portacabin in the town centre would not serve better I do not know.
The famous original staircase was decorated with posters warning of AIDS and other PC nonsense, given that few people would see them. For the "people of Wigan you see"
I wrote letters about this and I believe did an article on this blog about this degredation of our premier building but I heard nothing afterwards. I assumed the urgent and necessary repairs had been done.
Surprise, surprise, only a temporary fix had been done and the building is still at risk unless an estimated £2 million is spent.
Why is this still so? Why have the well remunerated councillors not insisted on the repairs before? or did they even know? Or care?
If they did not is that not a dereliction of duty.
If I knew about the state of the building all those years ago and I am not a councillor why did our councillors not know about our town's best building ?
This neglect of our heritage is nothing less than cultural vandalism and a disgrace to all involved.
Now I know that at a time of financial stringency cost is a problem, but it did not seem to be an insuperable problem for new offices for the overpaid and underworked staff of Wigan Metro which were erected recently.
I was further shocked to hear last night that the stables at the hall were in better shape having been equipped as offices replete with computers and other necessary equipment, for the Metro of course. A nice country setting for these "workers"
Another case of all talk and no action.
Some of the comments in the Evening Post have even suggested demolition.
I am appalled.
So go on Wigan Metro. Try for lottery money. Sack a few of your inspectors and diversity and equality officers (like Elliot? BTW have you not sacked him yet?).Pay your senior staff less. You can find the money if you want to.
How many hundreds of millions do you rake in in Council Tax? This is peanuts in comparison.
A project such as saving Haigh Hall would be doubly advantageous. It would save our heritage for future generations and give employment to the local building industry.
Wigan has suffered much in the past as its inhabitants toiled to play such a prominent part in our country's wealth.
Those parts unravaged by industry and their historic buildings MUST BE SAVED.
The wealth was syphoned out of our town in the past.
IT'S TIME TO GIVE A BIT BACK, YOU OWE IT US.
Haigh Hall gifted to the then Wigan council by Lord Crawford and described as "The Jewel of The Town" with its attendant country park close to the town centre has been found to have a leaking roof.
Well that is a surprise. I went on a conducted tour of the building over ten years ago and was shocked by its condition.
The rooms open to the public seemed in good repair but the back of the building and the attics were in a state of disrepair.
The attic formerly housing the nursery room and servants quarters was a shambles. There were leaks in the roof, but they had at least put buckets under these leaks (big deal) and "acro" supports holding some of the joists up.
I asked why repairs could not be done and was told that a covenant prevented it as the building belonged to the people of Wigan.
One room at the back WAS used as a Social Services office as this was allowed as helping the people of Wigan though why a Portacabin in the town centre would not serve better I do not know.
The famous original staircase was decorated with posters warning of AIDS and other PC nonsense, given that few people would see them. For the "people of Wigan you see"
I wrote letters about this and I believe did an article on this blog about this degredation of our premier building but I heard nothing afterwards. I assumed the urgent and necessary repairs had been done.
Surprise, surprise, only a temporary fix had been done and the building is still at risk unless an estimated £2 million is spent.
Why is this still so? Why have the well remunerated councillors not insisted on the repairs before? or did they even know? Or care?
If they did not is that not a dereliction of duty.
If I knew about the state of the building all those years ago and I am not a councillor why did our councillors not know about our town's best building ?
This neglect of our heritage is nothing less than cultural vandalism and a disgrace to all involved.
Now I know that at a time of financial stringency cost is a problem, but it did not seem to be an insuperable problem for new offices for the overpaid and underworked staff of Wigan Metro which were erected recently.
I was further shocked to hear last night that the stables at the hall were in better shape having been equipped as offices replete with computers and other necessary equipment, for the Metro of course. A nice country setting for these "workers"
Another case of all talk and no action.
Some of the comments in the Evening Post have even suggested demolition.
I am appalled.
So go on Wigan Metro. Try for lottery money. Sack a few of your inspectors and diversity and equality officers (like Elliot? BTW have you not sacked him yet?).Pay your senior staff less. You can find the money if you want to.
How many hundreds of millions do you rake in in Council Tax? This is peanuts in comparison.
A project such as saving Haigh Hall would be doubly advantageous. It would save our heritage for future generations and give employment to the local building industry.
Wigan has suffered much in the past as its inhabitants toiled to play such a prominent part in our country's wealth.
Those parts unravaged by industry and their historic buildings MUST BE SAVED.
The wealth was syphoned out of our town in the past.
IT'S TIME TO GIVE A BIT BACK, YOU OWE IT US.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)